Why Pi-hole when you can RouterOS adlist?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 126

  • @jan.kowalski
    @jan.kowalski 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    Amazing! Mikrotik is is the go to technology because they LISTEN to the people.

    • @ON3RVH
      @ON3RVH 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      but they don't.. they add features nobody in the real world wants/needs instead of fixing their bugs and testing new releases before they come out instead of letting the community do their bug testing...

    • @jan.kowalski
      @jan.kowalski 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@ON3RVH Aren't you a little negative person? For instance I'm happy with mikrotik products since early 2000s.

    • @ON3RVH
      @ON3RVH 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jan.kowalski negative? not really..
      I've used tik since a very long time and although I like using tik, ROSv7 has been an absolute nightmare..
      With every release they break new things, things that were working before are all of the sudden completely broken and new things that no one needs or wants are being added..
      DLNA, adlists, .. all useless for a router.
      DLNA for example has been obsolete for almost a decade but still the mikrotik team insists on putting money and effort into developing the standard all over a gain instead of fixing what is broken and new releases don't even get tested if you look at the forum.. all the bugs that folks find that are pretty easy to spot if they had done any decent testing of the release before putting it out there..

    • @user-lg4le8xr4s
      @user-lg4le8xr4s 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@ON3RVH how many times have you copy+pasted that on this video now

    • @ON3RVH
      @ON3RVH 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-lg4le8xr4s 0 as I don’t copy/paste..

  • @SoleSur5er
    @SoleSur5er 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Just add a whitelist option and it will be perfect for regular home use!

  • @Sarcasthik
    @Sarcasthik 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Nice feature ! As others have said, it's not really on par with Pi-hole's features but it's a start !
    I personally don't need all the features Pi-hole offers, so just being able to whitelist URLs and check requested URLs per device would be enough for me.

  • @DemisvanEyden
    @DemisvanEyden 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is a great addition to the already massive amount of options on RouterOS! I've set it up right away and it works. Awesome!

  • @EvangelosBrempos
    @EvangelosBrempos 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for adding more useful features to routeros. You people are awesome.

  • @byronnarainna677
    @byronnarainna677 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just tried it out , works perfectly , Mikrotik for the win

  • @marcoschirrmeister
    @marcoschirrmeister 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We indeed do not need pi-hole, but we still need the underdog blocky. Why, because of its incredibly powerful and flexible confiootions.

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In RouterOS You can already redirect DNS queries to an external Adblock dns server, like AdGuard or Cloudflare. Same as blocky

    • @shadowkora
      @shadowkora 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@mikrotik I personally use Pihole for local domain resolution along with Nginx, does Mikrotik allow that as well?

  • @OmegaNet-mj4sm
    @OmegaNet-mj4sm วันที่ผ่านมา

    love it!

  • @andresdds
    @andresdds 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    on hAP ac^2 with RO 7.15.2
    Locally hosted adlist - worked correctly, name-count=163299
    URL based adlist - same list, name-count=0

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Something prevented the download from URL. It could be incorrect SSL configuration, a firewall rule, DNS resolution problem or maybe just a typo in the URL.

    • @andresdds
      @andresdds 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@mikrotik I downloaded the file on the device itself without any problems with fetch, I will do more testing, thank you!

    • @mniewiera
      @mniewiera 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@mikrotik I'm having exactly the same problem. SSL verification is disabled, no firewall rule preventing it, dns resolution and typo can be ruled out since the same url worked when fetching the file on the router.

    • @mniewiera
      @mniewiera 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Same problem here. Also nothing in the logs. Please let me know if you find a solution ;-)

    • @koalasoftteam
      @koalasoftteam 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      same issue for me ( 7.15.2, hAP ac lite, local file OK, url NOK)

  • @VadimM-t4n
    @VadimM-t4n 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Should I change any DHCP or DNS settings except Adlist itself? I used Quick setup from the beginning

  • @japanstation1
    @japanstation1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    That's fantastic! Thank you for adding this feature.

  • @marine1718
    @marine1718 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice feature!

  • @krosa9173
    @krosa9173 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great feature!
    Please consider adding a whitelist option that can override entries from adlists. The StevenBlack list works nicely but I need to unblock a couple of domains. I know I can download the list, edit it and upload the file to router. But having to do that regularly becomes tedious and I miss out on the auto-updating adlists feature.

  • @DickyChengHK
    @DickyChengHK หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is it possible to save the adlist to usb / sd card instead of internal storage, my Chateau lte just have 16MB of internal storage.

  • @davelloyd8454
    @davelloyd8454 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Superb @mikrotik! Great job. Will this be going into the next release of winbox?

  • @NevaranUniverse
    @NevaranUniverse 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thats pretty awesome, though barebones. It would definitely benefit from the ability to comment each entry, and disable/enable them on-the-fly, just like usual adblock DNS'

  • @Graham_Rule
    @Graham_Rule 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    My Pihole currently uses a number of lists and merges them (allowing me to keep a list on a server of my own as well as using external list). Is this something that Mikrotik can add?

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You can use multiple lists as well

    • @liosali
      @liosali 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mikrotikdo we use the same method to add multiple lists ?

    • @BoraHorzaGobuchul
      @BoraHorzaGobuchul 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@mikrotik Yes, but does it merge them, avoiding duplication?

  • @AshAckroyd
    @AshAckroyd 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent, just excellent 😁

  • @educ6632
    @educ6632 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It would be good for it to download directly to RAM and bypass the flash, so CRS326 with 16MB of flash but enough RAM could use the feature.

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The list itself is already stored in RAM.

  • @Mexmex1975
    @Mexmex1975 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is this available on the MikroTik hAP ax3 US Version or MikroTik L009UiGS-2HaxD?

  • @anakinskywalker8624
    @anakinskywalker8624 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi :)
    Really nice video!
    Could you give several examples of other reliable lists?
    Thank you in advance!
    Best regards,
    Plamen

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Here is one source you can try firebog.net/

  • @cosmusmutua1083
    @cosmusmutua1083 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is support for nftables or ip2tables support on containers in the works? there a many usecases and apllications that require this to function properly eg ION devices

  • @thecowwarrior3
    @thecowwarrior3 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ad blocking works well in general. The main thing I'd like to do is block TH-cam ads though, and all the lists I've found so far don't seem capable of doing so. After some reading, a lot of folks seem to think this is impossible - though there are multiple browser extensions that can and do accomplish exactly that. Can someone provide some context/clarity to this?

  • @hoanggiangnguyen9308
    @hoanggiangnguyen9308 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    How long until mikrotik starts recursively resolving DNS?

    • @TeeEllohwhydee
      @TeeEllohwhydee 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can run a lightweight container with unbound/bind9 if you want a recursive DNS server.

    • @hoanggiangnguyen9308
      @hoanggiangnguyen9308 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TeeEllohwhydee I did it! I asked if mikrotik could integrate recursive DNS resolution, that would be great!

    • @hoanggiangnguyen9308
      @hoanggiangnguyen9308 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@TeeEllohwhydeeIf it is integrated into the router OS, what's better than that! Fortinet has got that. Maybe you want to run main on os not through container?

  • @kchiem
    @kchiem 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    also, some times it's useful to pause ad blocking. can this feature be paused without disabling every single list?
    EDIT: nevermind, I see there's a pause feature in Winbox. could have mentioned that in the video.

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is coming in one of the next updates

  • @lukaspopelka7587
    @lukaspopelka7587 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Does it support regex?

  • @kchiem
    @kchiem 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If a domain is listed in more than one host list, when it's matched, does the match count increment for both lists or just the first one?

  • @AdrianPatten
    @AdrianPatten 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Doesn't appear to work in 7.15.2 when using DoH Server (Cloudflare) Have also tried a simple text file. Ensured dns/cache had been cleared on test pc.

    • @DiscoDaveDance
      @DiscoDaveDance หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You need to upgrade to 7.16 for it to work in conjunction with doh

  • @DanielPetre
    @DanielPetre 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    But @MikroTik what is the update interval ?

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Currently 1h

  • @coldfiredesignstudio
    @coldfiredesignstudio 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gonna try 😊 thanks

  • @profkwl775
    @profkwl775 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what's the requirements for this to work? i tried it, using a file instead of the URL, name count was recorded or fetched correctly but match count doesn't. even when i open a website with ads, its as if nothing is blocked.

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did you increase cache amount? And did you set ssl verify to No?

    • @profkwl775
      @profkwl775 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mikrotik yes. i even set my own file with 2 domains only. name count 2, but when i open the 2 domains, they're both accessible and not blocked

    • @erkkiruohtula632
      @erkkiruohtula632 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@profkwl775 Same experience here, does not seem to do anything. Tried both with a local file and url. I'm running a newly-bought hAP ax2. OS reported as Version 7.15.3

  • @maxpain177
    @maxpain177 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow, perfect!

  • @zorganek
    @zorganek 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Super work ... thank.

  • @sonytest5601
    @sonytest5601 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice!

  • @Maverick87Shaka
    @Maverick87Shaka 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can be used to have a kind of "whitelist? so block everything except the urls of a specified list?

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Download the list to your computer and edit out the urls you don’t want blocked.
      Whitelist as a feature is coming soon

    • @Maverick87Shaka
      @Maverick87Shaka 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mikrotik Thanks for reply! I'll have to wait the whitelist feature, since I have to block everything (especially unknown sites) allowing just the one needed for a specif software to run. There is an ETA or target build for this feature to come?

  • @GreDi_PL
    @GreDi_PL 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This functionality does not work if the router has the Use DoH Server configured :sed-pepe:

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can’t “want to use other dns server” and “don’t want to use other dns server” at the same time.

  • @DrewskiusMaxiumusTheThird
    @DrewskiusMaxiumusTheThird 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    After adding, it will not download the file. Tried a few different things and ended up manually making the file myself after copying the links to a txt file. That does work but wont auto update. Hopefully that download issue could be fixed or has a fix to get it to work later on.

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Probably you forgot to set ssl verify to off

    • @DrewskiusMaxiumusTheThird
      @DrewskiusMaxiumusTheThird 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mikrotik Made that was off actually, also tried via winbox widget instead of cli. Looked over my firewall rules and cant see it getting blocked either.

  • @gushhnet
    @gushhnet 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Whitelisting please!

  • @4L3xN3t
    @4L3xN3t 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does it have the same clients grouping and white\blackilst functionalities pi-hole has?

    • @ON3RVH
      @ON3RVH 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      of course not.. It can't beat Pi-Hole as Pi-hole does so much more and is easier to maintain and troubleshoot
      The adlist on tik does not even have any features, just add the list and be done with it, while in the real world we need to do so much more and be able to whitelist too

    • @4L3xN3t
      @4L3xN3t 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ON3RVH ok, thanks for the confirmation. I suspected it was a truncated function that this way is practically useless

    • @orlagh277
      @orlagh277 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@4L3xN3ti think it might be better for low ram devices, my ac2 seems to run out of ram from time to time when a container is running, i might just switch to an adlist since i just want to block ad websites

  • @krillAmorim
    @krillAmorim 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can i use RouterOS on my Raspbery or Orange PI?

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No, bare metal install is only possible for x86 and AMPERE CPUs.

    • @krillAmorim
      @krillAmorim 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mikrotik that's why we continue to use pi hole. If it works on my rasp i would buy a level 4 license for routerOS.
      But don't get me wrong, i'll buy a Mikrotik hap ax model, they're amazing! But i can't decide. Hap AX lite AX2 or AX3.
      Please Mikrotik make it possible to run RouterOS on my PI devices!

  • @me.ko.i1279
    @me.ko.i1279 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Nice feature.

  • @RadHard
    @RadHard 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    is it possible to do DNS server randomization like in blocky? (golang) That also is quite nice for privacy

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can add as many dns servers as you want

    • @RadHard
      @RadHard 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mikrotik I've successfully implemented DoH using your guide, and it's working great for my home network. However, I'm encountering an issue with the new DNS adlist feature. Despite setting up 6 ad-blocking lists, none of them seem to be matching when I use various DNS testers. Is it possible that the adlist feature is incompatible with DoH? Or am I missing a step in the configuration process?

    • @hey_leao
      @hey_leao 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RadHard They said that you cant have this 2 features enable. Unfortunely, or you use DoH or use Adlist.

  • @NGC1433
    @NGC1433 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fantastic! Will check it out!

  • @locusm
    @locusm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This needs some form of whitelisting feature to be useful, otherwise you have to deploy the management of lists somewhere else.

  • @biki1973
    @biki1973 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    how hard is that feature on internal flash memory? just in case i use this feature by downloading lists to connected usb memory and then refreshing adlist, but maybe it would be nice in the future to add option to select temp location for downloaded lists?

    • @edddy22
      @edddy22 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      As it uses dns server ram cache, lists being downloaded are only being stored in ram I assume

  • @realivanjx
    @realivanjx 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    pihole is more reliable as of now

  • @livankiv
    @livankiv 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Do not forget to add NAT rule, to avoid addlist bypassing :)
    /ip firewall nat add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat dst-port=53 protocol=udp src-address=! to-addresses=

    • @RmFrZQ
      @RmFrZQ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      DNS-over-HTTPS will still bypass it. Any advice to mitigate that?

    • @livankiv
      @livankiv 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@RmFrZQ this task is for NGFW with DPI

    • @RmFrZQ
      @RmFrZQ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@livankiv I've thought the same...

    • @WongTag
      @WongTag 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is Mikrotik going to offer deep packet inspection in the future?

  • @omarkhayyam3787
    @omarkhayyam3787 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That’s so cool! Can’t wait to replace pihole with this 😂

  • @JokeryEU
    @JokeryEU 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    sadly it wont block youtube ads, pihole same wont

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It will. Just use a better list

    • @plenus7392
      @plenus7392 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      DNS-level cannot and has never been able to block TH-cam ads since the ad injection is done at the scripting level on the browser, and possibly in the future directly into the video stream

    • @thecowwarrior3
      @thecowwarrior3 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@mikrotikrecommend a "better list?"

  • @ON3RVH
    @ON3RVH 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Let me answer that question: Because Pi-Hole and AdGuard can do so much more than ROS
    yet another feature we don't need on a router instead of fixing bugs and testing releases before they come out

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Not everyone has a server to run pihole 24/7

    • @ON3RVH
      @ON3RVH 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@mikrotik sure they do. A rPi is cheap.

    • @Rewarpsudomakeinstall
      @Rewarpsudomakeinstall 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@ON3RVH I may have it, but this is more convenient.

    • @ON3RVH
      @ON3RVH 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Rewarpsudomakeinstall how so? No way to add whitelists, whitelist a single domain, add device groups, identify devices on your network, ..

    • @BoraHorzaGobuchul
      @BoraHorzaGobuchul 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Rewarpsudomakeinstall convenient my backside

  • @EftiarHossain-oo2gq
    @EftiarHossain-oo2gq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Mikrotik

  • @ДжониКейжд-э2б
    @ДжониКейжд-э2б 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    no need for this feature

    • @davidz1264
      @davidz1264 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why? Please elaborate