UFOs: What Mysteries Could NASA’s New UAP Report Help Solve? | WSJ
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ค. 2024
- An independent study team appointed by NASA say that they haven’t found evidence of “extraterrestrial” unidentified anomalous phenomena, or UAPs, but a number of these discoveries are still a mystery.
Here’s why the government hasn't been able to explain what they are, and why NASA’s involvement could be a big step.
0:00 UAPs, explained
0:50 Limited data
1:57 Siloed agencies
2:52 Stigma around UAPs
3:58 What’s next?
News Explainers
Some days the high-speed news cycle can bring more questions than answers. WSJ’s news explainers break down the day's biggest stories into bite-size pieces to help you make sense of the news.
#UAP #UFO #WSJ
That was about the most empty report I could imagine.
Classic WSJ
Thanks for saving my time
What can you expect from the WSJ?
What did you expect? It’s a report on something that doesn’t exist.
@@whogivesadamnforuserKeep on closing your eyes and ears.
NASA in 1977 sent Steven Spielberg a 20 page letter informing him that releasing "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" could be very dangerous. Mr Spielberg: "I really found my faith when I heard the government was opposed to the film. If NASA took time to write me a 20 page letter, then I knew there must be something happening".
Steven Spielberg.. Have not watched anyone of his movies since the movie Super 8 that he produced. What a great film maker. The movies looks so fine and got so many layers of meaning.
I think this was more because they were worried it would make a mockery of science than any coverup
That was not Spielberg's take. Ill go with him.@@bigpaul4450
Guys, this settles it. 100% proof that extraterrestrials have visited earth and the US government is covering it up.
There is clearly no other explanation. Everyday we find more and more evidence of Aliens. I opened my fridge this morning and noticed I was out of milk. That was clearly the work of Martians.
Just because Spielberg said he got a letter doesn’t mean he did. Remember, he was selling a movie.
You probably weren’t born yet, but Jaws put the world into a near panic and sharks were being decimated by fools.
If NASA did send a letter, it was due to the fear of the inherent stupidity of people who would freak out from the movie.
Meanwhile, Mexico is like “check out these aliens”
What gets me is that they say these objects are not of extraterrestrial origin but at the same time indicate they still do not know what these objects are... also, it's been stated by pilots these things don't use any visible propulsion mechanisms which could indicate they there's no heat signature present. Why it would be colder than the ocean is beyond me but then again that's one of many questions we have to seek answers from, right? Also, one must take into account the pilot's perspective who witnessed these things directly and draw conclusions as to what they have claim to have seen.
Tiny bubbles of gas in the windscreen of an aircraft can refract light in such a way as to give rise to erroneous assumptions of UFO activity. Get real!
It could very well be space bending crafts that create a vaccum like environment around the craft. Basically floating through the space-time fabric. Hence could be cold af.
@@cyberhawk7274 I wonder if that could be a cause for blurry images?… The only visual evidence of black holes we have at present are all fuzzy images. Sounds convenient I know but I wouldn’t rule it out as a possibility.
Hm...to bend space takes an enormous power...we're talking black hole physics here...@@cyberhawk7274
If thay are made by humans then they pose more of a threat the if they were extra torrential. Being that either is likely, then we can say it's most probable that both are correct.
Most bring up the "Fermi paradox" to explain the lack of extraterrestrial life, when by all accounts we should be seeing alien life all over the Universe. Here's an unsettling explanation: if you are scuba diving above a coral reef and you know there SHOULD be fish all around you, but you don't see any. It's most likely that they have learned that for some reason its important not be be seen. And since you are new to this environment, chances are its not you they are hiding from...
"The Dark Forest" Hypothesis
Read the Book series starting with "The Three Body Problem" by author Liu Cixin.
Priorities:
1. Improve data collection technology such as video and 3D imagery
2. Surveil skies and waters of common UAP activity
3. Accessibility for citizens to report and submit information when UAP activity occurs. Submissions can include direction of sighting, location of witness, UAP's degree of elevation, movement of UAP, description, time, etc.
4. Anonymity or data protection of citizen reports.
5. Verification process such as multiple independent reports of the same activity
6. Dedicated agency to investigate reports
7. Improve perception and stigmas of reporting UAP activities within professional and nonprofessional settings
8. Release information from historic records involving UAPs
they should do the same with healthcare. We should slowly step away from text-book illness because the reality is illness comes in too many diffferent shapes or forms that's why healthcare can't accept chronic illnesses.
She mentions videos are grainy and unclear. Isn't that just how they are relesed ? i.e downgraded
Yes...as far as I'm concerned....these pilots are flying multi-million dollar aircraft...there is no way that "they" are not provided with HD cameras...it wouldn't make any sense to put so much money into a Defense System that is incapable of "visually" identifying a potential threat...that would be embarrassing to think that despite "technological" awareness "we" can't even "see" it right...???...it doesn't fit...As far as I am concerned there is definitely a copy of the same footage taken by the pilots in HD....but, as of yet, not been released....I'd love to see it....can't wait....here's hoping 🤞
@@numbtee8478its a hoax kiddo
@@numbtee8478maybe they would have if they didn't fail, likely those cameras can't bring clear images at those speeds and other technical reasons we aren't versed in
I bet a 4K camera hooked up to these equipment in all US aircrafts wouldn’t cost them $100K
maybe they would have but there are likely technical reasons they can't, maybe at top speeds they fail/aren't fast enough to capture, etc
I’m pretty sure they find a way to spend $100k on a hammer.
You're right why did no one think of this before... You deserve a nobel prize!
Whether it's a UFO or not, the Chinese balloon debacle shows we need to be more observant and seriously investigate anything we are not sure about.
This is what UFO people have been asking for. For decades. Scientists taking the topic seriously, and trying to figure it out.
just all drones
@@MrProzacmilkshake i wish. the fastest drone isnt even 1000mph. not even 1/10th the speed of the ufos that government is reporting.
I agree. I want the answers without having a agenda, if there is something out there I want to know if it looks convincing and the truth is there is a boring explanation I also want to know that. I just want the truth wherever that leads, I'm all ears. Just FKN get on with it please fr fr lol😅
Seti has been investigating this for decades. Just out there. Let's face it, those mexican mummies look incredibly fake. As the video says, the most interesting stuff, the navy footage, is incredibly ambiguous.
UAPs are just secret military aircraft in development 🤣 we are the aliens
Imagine having a james webb satelite that can capture photos light years away but can't even capture strange things that enters our planet lol
I know hey! But even if they spot something which I’m sure they already have numerous times they won’t show us.
But you have to direct the James Webb to look the Earth, not the space... but for that we have already a lot of (spy) satellites, launched by private companies and the military.
It's probably easier to look at someone else's armpit than your own.
Because there aren't any going thru the firmament. Theyre from here imo, somewhere we don't know about publicly.
@@SofaKingShit No. I can pull out my phone right now, where I'm sitting and look at my armpit. It's called technology.
0:20 not using a propulsion system and thus cannot be a spaceship...
They forgot to include the possibility of anti-gravity technology and technology that enables energy sources to not cause heat. Kinda bad reporting in my opinion on that part.
Any "free energy" device would produce cold given the nature of Dirac sea hole current (and similar concepts). Floyd Sweet's VTA device, when the output was "shorted" out on itself (drawing maximum current), it froze the coils and they iced over as the water vapor in the atmosphere froze on them. This same cooling is present in all of these "over-unity" devices. It makes sense if you consider it as a form of "negative entropy".
There is misinformation all over this nonsense with their disclosure. Other than them not being extraterrestrial. They've been here in mortal flesh since they betrayed the Father. Corrupting and enslaving humans for thousands of years (written about in the Book of Enoch and the Old Testament). The floods didn't wipe them out completely. By now, they've got a whole network of bases underground, below the ice caps, on the moon, other moons in the solar system, and probably Mars (I don't know; seems right given the Andrew Basiago sideshow).
I have a lot more to write on this subject, but I wanted to point this out to you about Floyd Sweet's device if you were not aware of it. I don't check for responses, so I won't know if anyone responds with questions. Tom Bearden's website is no longer available, but Jean-Louis Naudin still seems to have his site up. I recall these off the top of my head since I did all my free energy and anti-gravity research decades ago. I regret not saving all the info on the assumption that it would always be there. I found one good video on Bearden's MEG on youtube with 157 views... So the information is dying off.
edit: I don't study this stuff anymore, and now study meta-physics and theology. With full submission to the Father and his son Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit. I also don't endorse the use of free energy or anti-gravity, as I consider it to be overstepping bounds and a betrayal of the Father (kind of a like a modern tower of babel, humans have not earned the right to leave this star system because we are very unrighteous in our intentions).
@@paulsaulpaul Lay off the crack
pop science buzzword bingo here we go
Given all the advanced technology regarding the space program, Hubble and the JW telescopes, along with the most advanced fighter planes in the world, and you expect us to believe, that these grainy 1950's photos/videos are the best pictures they're able to get??? C'MON MAN !!! 🤨
You think this is all the government has...the best pictures and clear videos the government keeps classified..and when everyday citizens post clear pictures, people say it's fake or ai generated
🤨 Don't ask questions. Just believe whatever they ask you to believe
that's why u shouldn't believe these are alien spaceships, they would have been captured on those devices already
@@melxbThey have also been captured on HD video. and photos. Just do a search.
@@Thunderbyrd. if they did we would have already announced that we found life outside of our own, so those are probably fake, explainable or again still not clear enough to say one way or another since they could pass for/be explained away as objects from earth
NASA can't comprehend the idea that there may be technology that is further advanced then earth's. Bill Nelson also admitted that he had not made himself familiar with the UAP hearing but isn't that his job?
Oh they comprehend it very well. But they have to appear as if they don’t.
Hmmm, if they can't find their own plane, i'm in doubt..
What is NASA's assessment of the 2004 tic tac incident? Has NASA requested and received classified data to assist in their assessments?
They said their analysis, etc. would all be unclassified for transparency
They said they are using only unclassified data that is already on the public domain .
I think narrator said it was anomalous because it had no propulsion evident.... standard answer to swerve alien technology explanation....
Didnt nasa recently go out in public and say they confirm that ufo's exist but they believe they have no extraterrestrial origin. And they also said that they dont know whats causing those ufos
All your questions are a yes but you wont get a direct answers.
Why is it difficult to get better footage? I have a 4K camera in my pocket, but every time the military releases UAP footage it looks like it's from 1970.
How about you take your 4k camera and record someone from like 5 miles away. Post it and let's see how well it turns out!
Government loves to release grainy footage. They probably have way better images. They won't release to the public.
Exactly! My small commercial drone has 4k and provides better footage then what the government has released from several multi-million aircraft! C’mon’ guys - 😂 you can’t make this stuff up!
When a pilot says, "I seen a UAP, you got my attention."🙏
One of our pilots said "I seen a UFO"? The first step should be to get him back in English class to learn how to use proper grammar... yikes.
Thanks for the coverage.
I’m no astrophysicist, but I’d say it’s most likely a tie-fighter.
it reminds me of a civilian report of seeing two big aliens in their backyard to a police 3 months ago
now we have iphones and samsungs with the best cameras yet we still have no photos. But everyday we have the best footage of people freaking out in public.
go shoot something outside a few football fields away and tell how me how it looks...
point your phone at a plane flying above your head. see how good the quality of your photo is. sky is really big. and knowing where to point cameras is extremely hard when these objects are flying much faster than military jets, let alone commercial planes.
Looks fine when you know what you're doing.@@DITTOE
These "objects" aren't being reported at 30 thousand feet. You and DITTOE go to the same logic and reasoning class??@@Fellolkek
The issue is we need to develope better cameras . An AI camera that can track things are present cameras can't. Considering we can take pictures Billions of light-years away. This shouldn't be a problem. Develop the tools we need to get the answers we want instead of wasting time and money on archaic tech. Chemical propulsion is not the future😔
"I don't know what this is."
Therefore I am an expert on visitation from allien civilizations...
Despite running software and complex calculations and research on it we don't know what it is.
@@paxundpeace9970 This.
It certainly doesn't help that the media overhypes all this 😒
"Overhypes"? All mainstream media are silent as graves about this topic. And thank God they are, I can do without the giggles, X-Files music and talking about "little green men".
@@stephanlandshuter5237 nonsense...they overhype it. Even the ones definitely solved are shown as "unidentified" like the one at the start of this video...if you don't know, that is what a bird looks like in infra-red. Flies with about 40mph, at 4 miles height...let me introduce you to "the goose".
I'm sorry you can't cope with the fact that they are all nothing burgers.
The media is more focused on Hunter Biden, Ukraine and Trump. I never hear about UFO reports.
I remember a bright red and green colour round in shape orb like flew past over my house.. My sister saw that as well.. we were so young we thought it was a ghost or something.. and now we still talk about it everytime we read news like this
Am loving every minute of Disclosure😎
Yeah, the disclosure is there’s nothing there other than ordinary aircraft and balloons.
what disclosure hahaha
@@danielgarcia8815are you living on mars ?
My son is a pilot. They see strange things all the time. More smartphones catching more images.
When people bash civilian UFO footage for being bad and then you get MILITARY GRADE EQUIPMENT showing UFOs and its still considered bad.
Everything on this planet can be explained thanks to our level of comprehension. These things exist. This is not new. We have been telling them these things for quite some time now. Regardless of what people believe it's only logical to study these phenomenons. So if they know these not UAPs then they must have the answer. Looking at videos and listening to testimonials it's quite easy to see the importance of learning about these objects. Someone has solved how to move more efficiently through our atmosphere then we can and that alone would propell our society forward. There not Ghosts, there not angels , they are not mammals ... come on folks what could these things be. Considering someone has the ability to control our nuclear arsenal. That should be a Major concern🤔
They are our gardner's and we are the plants
I lost all respect for NASA.
The latest NASA report said the same thing every government agency now say:
"We have no evidence these things came from outer space."
"We now have a task force studying it."
"We don't know what these things are."
"We need more data" (even though NASA already has data from over 60 years of space exploration).
In other words, we know nothing, we see nothing!
This is why i have a lot of respect for nasa they tell what they know and what they don't it's not like they are the CIA.
what do you want them to say?
@@paxundpeace9970 The see-ai-ay told NASA what to say!
@@nathandean5869 In other words, I want NASA to come clean!
@@andyhughes1776 Nah.....you wan't NASA to agree with you.
I hope there's a big reveal soon
Mick West explained "Go Fast" quite some time ago, and had it bang on.
0:15 4.2 miles above the water? That is ~22,000 feet. So the pilot is at 30,000 feet? And 40mph is slow.
I suppose the WSJ knows more than the FA-18 pilots, personnel, sensors, radar, flir, targeting pods, etc
Take note, they lack the proper equipment, therefore cannot say with certainty. In other words they haven't found evidence that the UAPs are piloted by E.T. or otherwise because they currently don't have the correct technology in place. Bill also states they really don't know what they are, which contradicts what he says.
I m a junior scientist with materials and aeronautical engineering background. I can tell you that we dont discuss about it at all, mostly out of fear of the perceptions our colleagues around us. Perhaps some renounced tenured tracked professors from IVE league universities may dare to comment on it once or twice but that's it.
The government need to not just acknowledge but support the research of things we cannot explain in the sky. Perhaps e.g. some National Science Foundation funding for UAP study so we can buy some equipment for systematic study. There also need to be some professional scientific journals about this so there can be peer review process in place to check the integrity of research. This is more reliable and effective than a bunch of scientists working secretly in the government with only narrow perspectives of a few people and limited data from some non scientific reports.
And if we keep missing and identifying large "weather" ballons - what else do we not see?
As a person who love gazing at the stars here in Africa I always see these moving ubove the clouds, sometimes 6 at once, and as an engineer I could easily conclude based on the movement pattern that they weren't airplanes, jets or man spaceships,... course all these would crash instantly they are just not build for such movements or manoeuvre
Man I bet you can see all the stars. In America it's too much light pollution. We can't see the stars anymore and it sucks. When I was a kid I remember looking up and seeing millions of stars it was amazing. Now at night you might see 10 or 15 stars if your lucky.
You probably saw Elon Musk's starlink satellites
Likely Starlink
NASA- "never a straight answer"
organizations around the world have so much money and talent to develop new technologies that are becoming out of control from governments that cannot guarantee their own airspace sovereignty, kinda concerning
Nasa can't identify these objects with their multi million dollar equipments, yet some youtubers have concluded that the navy videos are just birds
birds: exist
americans: OMFG ALIENS!!!?!??!?
You can’t tell me that what this video shows is representative of what the government knows.
Don't forget these Military pilotes aren't seeing lights in the sky .... they are seeing craft!!! with no wings and no signs of propulsion which out fly our best military hardware.
Time for high def cameras on PUBLIC!! air craft, that can be freely given to NASA
NASA has been lying about UAPs since if was founded, better to give that footage to the best scientists in the USA. The Galileo project for example.
0:20 Balloon. The impression of speed is an illusion due to apparent motion. Remember, the jet is traveling at a high speed and the sensor is zoomed in.
Obviously not extraordinary technology as the sensor easily locked on.
1:44 The out of focus aircraft didn’t move off at high speed. The sensor lost lock and the sensor was zoomed in at 2x setting. Again, apparent motion. Look at the magnification data on the display.
The Middle East ball…balloon.
Gimbal? The IR plume of another jet. The rotation was due to the sensor rotating its camera to keep the object within its operating range.
2:00 Already explained by DoD. A drone was trying to track another drone and a commercial airliner was disrupting the sensor. The back and forth movement was solely caused by the sensor attempting to find the drone. Again, apparent motion.
Chill guys that was just a seagull hunting on its prey 🤣
It’s crazy how most of these crafts look exactly like the Vimana (spelled wrong 😂) … these craft have been visiting for thousands of years. It’s in every culture every religion ect
It seems neural networks are going into the private sector, better cameras, low-cost FLIR and high-res, etc. The possibility of a civilian capturing something is so high now that NASA, Congress, DOD, etc. have no choice but to start to disclose "something" about this.
0:20 In other words, it’s flying at the speed of a bird, it’s the size of a bird and at the altitude of a bird. Literally a goose or something. The amount of over sensationalism is incredible.
Birds aren’t real.
You have skeletons in your closet, I have aliens in my basement. -Chris Brown
What a fascinating time to be alive! There will be so many revelations as secrets come to the daylight and as science is catching up with these! Cannot wait for what's to come!
Also cannot wait to see all the hypocrites fall on their faces for their ridicule over the decades.
Nothing is going to happen. Grow up.
Just a reminder that neither the term UFO or UAP has any relation to extra terrestrials. Not to say they couldn't. I would also argue that neither term would apply if we did determine them as extraterrestrial seeing as that would begin to identify them. I am on board with the person who stated that extraterrestrial should be the last resort assumption.
I'm actually thoroughly disappointed that they didn't mention the discussions in Congress about access to information the government has on UAPs.
I guess the fact we're talking about UFO/UAPs is a good thing in general. But there's nothing ground breaking here.
Government is adamant to prove it all a 'Cake' like those videos 'is it a cake?' 😂
Its difficult to get higher quality footage, when they dumb down the quality. ;) As stated per the fighter pilots and government officials.
@0:46 - It's a cricket, vibrating on the inside of the wing between the cowling and the sensor.
THat video at start is zoomed in with higher fov. Its not flying fast at all. 10 points though for solid tracking skills
Good report.
"It's colder than the water, so it has no propulsion system, so it's probably not a spaceship". Some major assumptions right there. Just that we only use combustion-based propulsion systems right now doesn't mean than that something else is not possible
They can photograph your doorbell with a satellite, but they can't find a UFO on all those satellite images?
NASA is completely aware of this. And far more information.
Thank you for not playing dramatic loud music in your videos... We can actually understand your dialogue !
0:24 "So it's probably not a spaceship" - if data is so limited, why the blanket statement? Surely the correct thing to say is 'We don't know enough to guess what it is'...
The first few seconds I thought we found a real tie fighter
Simple...Nasa needs to give access to raw pictures on the dark side of the moon and Mars.
The best publicaly collected footage you will see is from the 2012 earthquake tsunami in Japan. The pair of small craft match the Aguadilla UAP craft flight characteristics. Nobody can explain how they fly from air to liquid. A force field ? They make SpaceX obsolete by millenia. Was originally aired on CNN
dont be fooled by this old age debate about the "quality" of footage not being sufficient to prove this craft are more than capable of breaking our known laws of physics. military aircraft and ground installations have monitored and recorded these craft in high detail but this footage is either scrubbed so heavy the resolution fails to properly showcase the craft or operators decides not to turn in the footage out of fear of retaliation.
That's a TIE fighter ! The death star is real!
What the report revealed is that the unofficial acronym Never A Straight Answer still holds true...
Dr. Weisenheimer-Alert: 0:33 actually "phenomena" is plural, what you want here is "a......phenomenon"
Hmmmmm government is trying so hard to convince me there are aliens.
Lol
Read the footnote at 2:26
Under the Title: “Coming soon”
-->National security withheld.
Slower than the JFK data release!
Hey WSJ Editor- the correct words are "aircraft" not "aircrafts", and "radar" not "radars".
We went from no photos/videos to graining photos/videos.
Turns out CGI doesn't create a wake in water.
Can I have my award now ?
NASA says "bird, balloon, aircraft, balloon". End of story.
We are being watched by human beings who live in space on ships as explorers. One day, we will join them.
How do you know?
Beam me up, Scotty
@@amigoloco2484 I know, because of how it makes me feel. My explanation for the UFO phenomenon is simple, and beautiful. There is NO better answer to the question.
I developed this theory after many years of interest in the UFO phenomenon. Do you know the man Travis Walton? His story was how I figured it out (he was accidentally electrocuted by a Flying Saucer that he encountered in the forest, and he went missing for 5 days. He woke up on a ship, and saw .... human beings. Look it up.)
*If we are being watched by humans, then WHAT are these* -> 👽!!??
These -> 👽 are *Artificial Intelligence* “Robots.” And there are many different types of “robots,” that’s why people report seeing different “types” of “Aliens.” We will build the SAME machines.
We are NOT alone! Humans are the logical conclusion to evolution, the Creation that can understand the Creator.
Don’t believe the people who say we are destined for extinction. They are WRONG. We are DESTINED for the STARS. We will join our brothers and sisters in space. They believe in us, they have faith in us, and they are waiting for the day we join them.
@@amigoloco2484 He's right! I can tell you! I'm one of them. I'm typing this comment from one of these very spaceships! Actually, no, we don't type. We just think and comments get submitted, instantly. Jesus is sitting next to me, on my left, and Saint Peter's on the other side (upside down, as he usually does - but hey, there's no up and down where we are). We'll come and get you for a quick tour. Get ready: wear a clean pajamas.
It's just sounds weird you would even say something like that. Are you just joking?
the quality argument is flawed, when the military kept the high resolution video and gave a downgraded version to the public, why did they give the high resolution video not even to the congress?
nasa makes new project to find life (their main goal) after 70 years... forgets to even make up a person to run it until 3 hours after asked.
They say: What's the easiest way to end the shenanigan? Say it some malfunction of detectors or wrong perception of observers.
If it's brighter than the ocean, it is warmer, not colder. The downside of having someone with a nice voice rather than knowing what they are talking about.
NASA doesn't have force field tecnology. UAP craft do . This can be seen in the 2012 Japan earthquake tsunami footage
This is a big story. But, it’s weird that it’s not bigger. You would think that now that it’s proven that it would be the biggest story in human history.
Public opinion:
1990, The government is trying so hard to convince me there aren't aliens.
2023, The government is trying so hard to convince me there are aliens.
Mass psychosis.
I don’t think aliens pilot the craft. It’s most probably top secret human technology we don’t know about
I wonder how much money NASA spent on a report that says we need more information.
Nasa: Hi welcome to nothingburger where we serve nothing but nothingburgers.
NASA The largest Nothing Burger Bar anywhere.
@@Thunderbyrd. You got it.
@@MarkMcCray-gg3wx Yea they got aliens hiding in there. Let's go find out what they're hiding, just remember to wear your tinfoil buttplugs
Mr Graves is a hero, twice.
hudreds to thousands of pilots saying they saw a ufo means nothing apparently
it reveals words you will have to search in every page in dictionary or type in your search engine. there is nothing else to know from it
Prolly Goku's Kintoun cloud, or Soviet drones from Yuri.
I was saw the same thing about 18 years ago when I in child hood .same shiny surface round body fly in the air .
The word phenomena is plural; the singular form is phenomenon.
Title: 💯
Outcome of this video: 👁️👄👁️
MFs have Cameras to see black holes and the galaxies from the edge of the universe...
But when it comes to UFOs... Suddenly it has the quality of a flip phone from 2001.
That former fighter pilot is multiples more eloquent than a majority of today's politicians. Choose where you put your trust more wisely.
If UAPs were either alien craft or advanced earthly weaponry, there would be solid evidence. I don't care if someone once flew a jet fighter (thank you for you service), but that doesn't mean that person is not cashing in on the bogus fads.
I’d be blasted, that is a TIE Fighter
Ryan graves… Sees a party balloon in the sky and it’s aliens…
Never A Straight Answer
If the government says there’s aliens there’s definitely not aliens!
Wake me up when they find Space Orks.
These are not ufo's, the one object was actually going no more then 40mph, but the angle of the video makes it appear to be going faster. If ufo's do come to earth they would be more discrete, etc. Most likely they would observe earth from a great distance and would not just appear in the open view to be seen by everyone, Bob