Using Split Diopters to Enhance Your Storytelling and Compositions!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 29

  • @jay_elias__
    @jay_elias__ ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I saw some great looking shots in "Evil Dead Rise" yesterday, and I wanted to know how they did it! I'm pretty sure they used something like this! It's amazing

  • @stigmatedbrain
    @stigmatedbrain 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "Blow out" from BDP! what a superb one!

    • @avanishdutta2658
      @avanishdutta2658 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He used it quite a lot. It became his signature shot, but it was used long before him.

  • @OscarHernandez-js3pk
    @OscarHernandez-js3pk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What the heck, I ordered on yesterday and this pops up on my feed today 😊

  • @ArtisFX
    @ArtisFX ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great technical and creative use of these optics.

  • @MarkLargo
    @MarkLargo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    0:13 Tito pulls focus with his mind.

  • @chris_sparrows
    @chris_sparrows 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I found a few inexpensive ones online some time ago, but I like the ability of these to move the split off the center point.

  • @lennartbreede
    @lennartbreede 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    There was a split diopter shot Toy Story 4 which was super effective and cool to see in CG

  • @Ed-davies
    @Ed-davies 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Oh man! Idea overload!!! Great episode

  • @Veptis
    @Veptis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There is also the option of tilt/swing lenses. It's usually a feature of photography lenses in large format view cameras or special Tilt/Shift lenses meant for architecture photography or macro setups with bellows etc. It allows you to have an apparently tilted focus plane.
    You can even get tilt adapters when you have extra image circle to use.
    There is even a set of Cine lenses by Schneider Kreuznach that allows for some tilt/swing and they seem affordable used - so might not be great.
    As for using these kind of tricks with anamorphic lenses or adapters? i have no idea as I have never seen it.

  • @TheArtOfCharlieConstantinou
    @TheArtOfCharlieConstantinou 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    There’s fantastic use of this in All The Presidents Men.

  • @Holtenstein
    @Holtenstein 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Another great video. This makes me think, I have access to a wet saw. I wonder if I could just cut a cheap +1 diopter in half? Although Cine Packs are reasonably priced although I don't see where they state the sizes. Would they cover the FVD16B and the FVD35A? Thanks again for the anamorphic content, Cheers

    • @andychen6175
      @andychen6175 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s 79mm. It covers the fvd16b. That’s what I use it for.

  • @manoharreddy8613
    @manoharreddy8613 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's just awesome

  • @roquefortfiles
    @roquefortfiles ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jaws has 3 or 4 split field shots.

  • @TheMonochromeMemoirs
    @TheMonochromeMemoirs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Got my sub. Great presentation

  • @ForestCinema
    @ForestCinema 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My notebook has a collection of concepts for split field and slit field diopter use in specific compositions. When you have a concept, jot it down!

  • @natalieclark5985
    @natalieclark5985 ปีที่แล้ว

    I recently purchased one before someone showed me a cool effect it gave for photography (not cinematography). Is it uncommon to use with still photo? Do you recommend any videos on techniques to watch? Thank you!

    • @AnamorphicOnABudget
      @AnamorphicOnABudget  ปีที่แล้ว

      It's not uncommon, although what you're probably looking for is not exactly what this video is describing! I'm not sure any videos go super in detail about what you can achieve, but some give good ideas! Cinepacks' website has some process and results in there! cinepacks.store/products/cinepacks-split-filter

  • @antonelladitillo4367
    @antonelladitillo4367 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello! doeas this works with classic lenses too? Does the split lens have a magnifier? how do you create that amazing double focus with a single focus lens? thanks

    • @andychen6175
      @andychen6175 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Works for any lens!!

  • @BenWells95
    @BenWells95 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just wondering, why not close the aperture and increase the lighting instead?

    • @AnamorphicOnABudget
      @AnamorphicOnABudget  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sometimes you can't do one, sometimes you can't do the other, and, sometimes you still want shallow DOF on both sides!

  • @EugeneMaynard
    @EugeneMaynard 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍🏾🙏🏾

  • @dericksilva281
    @dericksilva281 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wouldn't say "unnatural". Since in real life we have freedom to choose what to focus on. And like, unfortunately we still haven't achieved a vibrating lens set that oscillates it's focus from nearest to infinite a couple thousands times per second under milions of frames per second, the only thing to achieve this, used to be computer graphics. Well, at least before game makers start flirting with cinema, and destroying the image with motion blur generated by radial and gaussian filter instead of by high frame rate and faking object defocusing. What, in computational world, really IS unnatural!

  • @escapemetracks
    @escapemetracks 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This are some of the things you don’t need.

    • @Henchproductions
      @Henchproductions 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I actually am going to need this specifically for a scene in a short I'm shooting in september.