Beautiful Takeoff out of Chicago O’Hare | ORD | Delta Boeing 717 | Seat 25A

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 มี.ค. 2024
  • Beautiful and powerful take off out the Chicago O’Hare airport. Sat in Seat 25A in a Delta Boeing 717 which in my opinion is the best seat in the house!
    FLIGHT INFO
    Flight number: DAL 2122
    Origin: Chicago (ORD)
    Destination: Detroit (DTW)
    Aircraft: Boeing 717
    Seat: 25A
    Duration: 1hr 20min
    ------Tip Jar------
    Venmo: @aviationfascination
    #delta717 #deltaairlines #boeing717

ความคิดเห็น • 162

  • @crphoto303
    @crphoto303 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +91

    Welcome to O'Hare, where we drive you halfway to your destination...

    • @FASTTRACK2ENGLISH
      @FASTTRACK2ENGLISH 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Welcome to Ohare! Where a bus tour of Chicago is included before your flight! 🌆

    • @boom-bm1kl
      @boom-bm1kl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @user-fg2ht6rx6x
      @user-fg2ht6rx6x 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That is so true you can take a nap just getting to the terminal

    • @nikkidodd2305
      @nikkidodd2305 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No kidding! Alo g with Atlanta, JFK and some others I been to. Tel Aviv and Cairo wasn't bad at all!

    • @mattd.4133
      @mattd.4133 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I flew from st Louis to Dallas then to Lubbock. I'm 2 hours from St. Louis so there is that. Then you have to be at the airport 2 hours in advance. Then comes a 2 hour delay, we finally get to Dallas about a 1 1/2 hour flight. Then 3 hour layover, then 2 hour delay, finally take off heading to Lubbock a 45 minute flight. Then a 2 hour drive to my destination from there. Took me approximately 15 hours of travel flying, I could have drove to Muleshoe in 16. F- flying!

  • @enumrob
    @enumrob 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I hope these 717's keep flying for many years to come. I've flown in many Dc9's and Md80's, Love to see these still flying. What a workhorse.

    • @Chad-sp4hq
      @Chad-sp4hq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It had all day to warmup

    • @tylermcintyre1454
      @tylermcintyre1454 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tyler Mac me too

    • @user-dw4kn9oi1m
      @user-dw4kn9oi1m 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True, keep em flying !

  • @verleguntrumjr.2787
    @verleguntrumjr.2787 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    That is an enourmas airport. Excellent vid of the airport.

  • @glenbearh9109
    @glenbearh9109 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Buzz saw! love the sound

  • @dlane5292
    @dlane5292 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    My first DC9 flight was on PSA from LAS-SAN-SMF in December of 1987. My first 717 was on Hawaiian HNL-OGG, & bsck later that day in the Fall of 2011.
    Always love watching videos like this from time to time when I can't fly for whatever reason.

  • @donmn763
    @donmn763 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    What a beautiful video. Great arial view of O'Hare and the sunset. But am I weird? The dramatic hum of those fans at take off are oddly reassuring for me. Thanks for sharing the video.

    • @tylermcintyre1454
      @tylermcintyre1454 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tyler Mac and you said we are going too Chicago too live

    • @Fucktheworld14020
      @Fucktheworld14020 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think any jet engine sound while on a plane is “reassuring” it’s when you don’t hear that sound is when it’s time to worry lol

  • @user-dw4kn9oi1m
    @user-dw4kn9oi1m 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow, classic Delta 717 take off out of O'Hare, great views in video clip

  • @ryanleclaire3948
    @ryanleclaire3948 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    What the f*ck. That thing ripped off without a care in the world. What an amazing departure. I swear those 717s were always over powered. Great video!

  • @elizabethsyberg-schmitt3332
    @elizabethsyberg-schmitt3332 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Perfect takeoff, text-book perfection.
    I tip my hat to this Captain, ❤

  • @rosewetzel8284
    @rosewetzel8284 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I don’t think I knew about this kind of lovely jet until now💞☮️✈️

    • @tylermcintyre1454
      @tylermcintyre1454 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tyler Mac how About this one

  • @321fly
    @321fly 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    those engines are blaring bro. Nice video! Subscribed!

  • @thebacdoc6464
    @thebacdoc6464 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Omg, the taxiway to the run way, reminds me of Den or Dallas, seems like ur going 3/4 miles b4 ur number ONE for takeoff!!!

  • @Zickcermacity
    @Zickcermacity 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Pause and reflect at 7:40.... As filmer zooms in, notice the remaining portion of runway 32R
    Again at 8:17 or thereabouts. Shortly after this point, north of 32R, East Touhy Ave becomes visible from under the wing. You might be able to just make out a trailer park on the right hand side of the Avenue, across from the O'Hare property.
    Say a prayer for those who perished in that location, aboard departing American Airlines flight 191 in 1979, and for their relatives and friends.

    • @AndyStraus-nq8db
      @AndyStraus-nq8db 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I lived in Arlington Heights at the time of the crash and we saw the smoke plume beginning to rise. Extremely unsettling.

    • @msr1116
      @msr1116 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      My dad and I drove out to Rockford the very next morning. There was no more smoke but I could see the cluster of trees that shielded the crash site. It was an eerie feeling I still remember---and it's going on 45 years now. If you delve into what caused the engine to detach in the first place, you'll really get angry. Entirely preventable crash.

    • @Zickcermacity
      @Zickcermacity 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@msr1116 I now consider the 737(Max and other variants) to be more dangerous to the flying public than any DC-10!

    • @msr1116
      @msr1116 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What the hell is going on at Boeing and with aircraft maintenance that so many mishaps are occurring since the two Maxes were lost ? Ralph Nader's niece died aboard one of them. It's damaging the brand with an image of inattention to quality control and will eventually affect passenger confidence.

    • @OSTARAEB4
      @OSTARAEB4 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @Zickcermacity-I remember that Friday Avenue about 3:00pm and saw the smoke from our living room. I thought it was the tank farm that fueled the airport at first. I then remember all surrounding communities and resources heading there. For the longest time, I couldn’t drive Touhy past that field.

  • @kamikazeair4778
    @kamikazeair4778 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The old, tangled O'Hare runway setup still boggles my mind to this day.

  • @abramsmm1
    @abramsmm1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    RR engines always have a wonderful growl. BR715 iirc.

  • @savagemaggot007
    @savagemaggot007 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice capture

  • @chermusall1179
    @chermusall1179 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Delta pilots are amazing !

    • @tylermcintyre1454
      @tylermcintyre1454 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tyler Mac yes I like them too

  • @redsky8763
    @redsky8763 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    You can usually expect to do a lot of taxiing at O'Hare. Just like in this video.

    • @aviationfascination
      @aviationfascination  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes you can!

    • @msr1116
      @msr1116 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The airport is 11.25 sq miles or 4.8 million sq ft. That is one huge piece of real estate.

  • @clqudy4750
    @clqudy4750 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    What year is this?! Delta's still flyin' a 717 in 2024?! Awesome, and ancient! Great post!! 😁✈️🛩️

    • @aviationfascination
      @aviationfascination  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Yes they are! This was just last week!

    • @michaelchan8915
      @michaelchan8915 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A Boeing 717??? Never heard of it. Must be an old aircraft. I know of Boeing 727s with three engines mounted at the rear of the aircraft, but those are old. The only more modern ones I'm aware of from Boeing are the 737, 757, 767, 777 and 787s. I think the 737, 777 and 787 are the most common ones currently in service. I'm not sure if the four engine 747s are still manufactured or even in service.

    • @localbod
      @localbod 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@michaelchan8915 McDonnel Douglas produced the DC-9 / MD80 aircraft. Eventually they built the MD95 and after their merger with Boeing that model became the 717. It's a twin engined aircraft that can carry upto 134 passengers depending on the seating configuration. It's designed for medium haul routes and has a range of roughly 2000 miles.

    • @michaelchan8915
      @michaelchan8915 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@localbod thank you for the informative education!!! That answers my question about what happened to McDonnell Douglas. I had noticed their absence but never knew they merged with Boeing. At a seating capacity of 134 and a range of 2000 miles, I guess that makes it a relatively small air in comparison to the other models of aircraft from Boeing previously mentioned above.

    • @Jeff-sp7bg
      @Jeff-sp7bg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's the md 95

  • @timoswindowseat7045
    @timoswindowseat7045 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I really hope to have the chance to fly the 717 one more time. Last flight is already 10 years ago.

  • @sabrinafavero4262
    @sabrinafavero4262 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Very nice... I wish I could still travel like in the 90 s....Now everything is so expensive!! 😮

    • @theghostoftravel
      @theghostoftravel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it was expensive back then too, lmfao only the richer traveled.

  • @user-lm6nw3zd7d
    @user-lm6nw3zd7d 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    He forgot to lower the flaps for takeoff..

    • @MichaelHoare-vr7mo
      @MichaelHoare-vr7mo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yes,I noticed that flaps weren't set for take off normally for take off flaps 15 are set.

    • @michellee5935
      @michellee5935 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He did not because the aircraft is not going the same velocity. Plus my Delta 717 had no flaps deployed.

    • @EBaker0129
      @EBaker0129 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Worked didn't it.

    • @MrWolverine46
      @MrWolverine46 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      They probably didn’t deploy flaps because they had more than enough runway, and wanted to climb out faster.

    • @tylermcintyre1454
      @tylermcintyre1454 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tyler Mac what about higher

  • @Chad-sp4hq
    @Chad-sp4hq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice sound

  • @Pandacapricorn
    @Pandacapricorn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Beautiful overview of O’Hare. Better than my video

  • @CellForce1
    @CellForce1 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I didn’t realize until I listened on headphones, but engine 2 isn’t started until 0:58 when you can hear the low bass at startup.

  • @carlosfasce5812
    @carlosfasce5812 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    La potencia de esos motores impresionantes como suenan

  • @FootFetish27
    @FootFetish27 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I've had Uber trips with less milage, than it takes to get to a runway at O'Hare! 🤣🤣

    • @tylermcintyre1454
      @tylermcintyre1454 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tyler Mac yes the cars are really not good

  • @coolleo149
    @coolleo149 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The whistle fan blades and the vibration pointer while on full throttle engines almost sounded like the 737!

  • @Planetarygamers
    @Planetarygamers 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    0:21 Bless you

  • @johnnylawrence
    @johnnylawrence 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Id have freaked out thinking those flaps arent down enough

  • @mikehawk4714
    @mikehawk4714 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How exciting. A plane taking off. WOW !

    • @aviationfascination
      @aviationfascination  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Well, apparently 52k other viewers think so too!

    • @dlane5292
      @dlane5292 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The best most acelerating part of flight 🙂

  • @anthonyemmm
    @anthonyemmm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ohare airport should be its own City

  • @the13thone73
    @the13thone73 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Back in the day when you could board a Boeing and not worry about a tire coming off, a door opening in flight, pieces fallaing off the plane, and a flight crew that were onboard based on their skills and not DEI. Today, "We don't gaurantee your flight will meet it's destination but we do have a minoity pilet, a trans flight crew member, and the most diverser maintenance team in the industry. Preparing for take off. Let us all pray."

    • @aviationfascination
      @aviationfascination  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s United for ya.

    • @airlineplt
      @airlineplt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You must be one of those fragile white male losers who have never accomplished anything in life and are looking for someone to blame for your own abysmal existence. Let’s see 99.9% of all fatal crashes that have happened in these United States were piloted by white men. I guess you somehow think just because someone has white skin that makes them competent. It doesn’t. Get used to seeing more highly skilled black, brown and Asian folks in the cockpits. We ain’t going nowhere. But you’re welcome to get off. Nobody will miss you.

  • @d.t.5400
    @d.t.5400 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Awesome video! What did you use to film the take off? It's very smooth and clear 👏

  • @THE._.ANONYMOUS._.YT._.134
    @THE._.ANONYMOUS._.YT._.134 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Sounds like a321 iae

  • @CruceEntertainment
    @CruceEntertainment 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey I saw my old workplace on Touhy

  • @ccacioppo1956
    @ccacioppo1956 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You only lower flaps to 3% on take off.

  • @CellForce1
    @CellForce1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Set climb power at 7:21

  • @olmstedfirsttwo-toneavanti4183
    @olmstedfirsttwo-toneavanti4183 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    For a quiet flight sit in the front.

    • @aviationfascination
      @aviationfascination  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Ya but for an av geek, that takes the fun out of it!

    • @cojoausaviation9862
      @cojoausaviation9862 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I gotta hear the engines and the landing gear come up in that one lol

    • @aviationfascination
      @aviationfascination  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cojoausaviation9862right!!

    • @hockeyjon596
      @hockeyjon596 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      When the landing gear retracts it sounds like their gonna come right up through the floorboards haha

  • @B-rian937
    @B-rian937 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Yikes, did you choose that seat or piss off the gate agent?😂

    • @aviationfascination
      @aviationfascination  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hahaha yes, I chose this seat for this very reason!!

  • @ChristopherBix2
    @ChristopherBix2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Weird. Looks like a no flaps take off. And then the left aileron deflected downward for a left hand turn.

  • @rdowning60
    @rdowning60 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is a much older plane..I noticed the wing tips are flat..not like the newer ones bent upward
    Ya gotta wonder what year this was taken

  • @funnyharleyman
    @funnyharleyman 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m no pilot but couldn’t help but notice no flaps down on takeoff?

  • @rbuswell
    @rbuswell 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A 717 is a re-badged DC-9 ... a real hot rod. I loved flying those until they started dropping like flies because of the bad connecting rod design of the tail controls. Denzel Washington's movie Flight is all about why you don't want to fly a DC-9/717.

    • @aviationfascination
      @aviationfascination  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Haha not hardly! That movie is based on the Alaska MD-80 that went down because the jack screw broke because of faulty maintenance. The 717 is very safe to fly.

  • @CellForce1
    @CellForce1 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Set climb power 7:22

  • @nathanmcgowan6837
    @nathanmcgowan6837 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Taxiing on one engine?

  • @intelboydj1
    @intelboydj1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    5000 rpm

  • @Gabrielalexander1064
    @Gabrielalexander1064 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Which runway use by american airline before its crash.

    • @OSTARAEB4
      @OSTARAEB4 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      32R. Decommed and refigured field. The 14/32’s are no more. They were angled to fly over the NW suburbs.

    • @msr1116
      @msr1116 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The runways were reconfigured for reasons involving better ground efficiency, optimal wind direction and/or more options to redistribute air traffic so one or two residential areas aren't constantly besieged by overhead jet noise. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong but these seem logical and what I vaguely recall from local news reports. It's been a while since the runway redo.

  • @Chad-sp4hq
    @Chad-sp4hq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That thing was hauling on the concrete, couldve taken off 5 second before it did

  • @micotsaynes
    @micotsaynes 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Twice different than the Fokker 70

  • @bensnipes7288
    @bensnipes7288 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No flaps?

    • @sonnytaylor7521
      @sonnytaylor7521 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What you can't see is the slats in front of the wing

  • @calicojack3628
    @calicojack3628 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Never understood why O'Hare is "ORD". There is no d!

    • @scottsenatra1193
      @scottsenatra1193 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who knows…I’ve wondered too. Like LAX… so many really.

    • @aviationfascination
      @aviationfascination  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      O’Hare was originally named Orchard Field in the 1940’s.

    • @tonyde52
      @tonyde52 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It was originally ORCHARD PLACE FIELD in the 1940s. Somehow it was abbreviated to ORD.

    • @aviationfascination
      @aviationfascination  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@tonyde52 perhaps maybe because there is an ORD in OrchaRD!! 🤔

    • @redsky8763
      @redsky8763 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Back in the day, much of the current O'Hare Airport land was full of orchards (no airport) and wasn't in the city limits. When the airport was first built, the city of Chicago eventually snatched up the land and the airport. In time Orchard Field (ORD) became O'Hare Airport.

  • @MARK23048
    @MARK23048 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How did this plane get in the air with no flaps?

    • @MichaelHoare-vr7mo
      @MichaelHoare-vr7mo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It certainly would have needed much more runway than usual to get the required amount of lift,that's why flaps 15 are normally set because in that configuration it allows most lift and minimum drag and the plane needs less runway to reach take off speed.

    • @jaimecruz5608
      @jaimecruz5608 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      With roar of an engine can’t you hear the perfect sound I always seat by the window close to the engine live it when it roars or by the wings

  • @darylconyers6972
    @darylconyers6972 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I avoid flying on 717.

    • @aviationfascination
      @aviationfascination  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But yet ya watch videos of it….lol!! 😂😂

    • @laurafitzsimmons3803
      @laurafitzsimmons3803 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Me too

    • @vvvxt
      @vvvxt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I trust the 717 WAY more than than the new MAX line of planes

  • @tonyde52
    @tonyde52 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    How can ANYONE enjoy their flight with that horrible BUZZ SAW noise?

    • @aviationfascination
      @aviationfascination  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Only a true aviation geek!!

    • @motorcopjoe
      @motorcopjoe 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Music to my ears

    • @Lufthansa747productions
      @Lufthansa747productions 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      A flight is flight

    • @SmokeyGoodness
      @SmokeyGoodness 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I was just about to type the same thing! @@motorcopjoe

    • @verleguntrumjr.2787
      @verleguntrumjr.2787 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It used to bother me then I lived in a fraternity and then OCS so I can sleep through anything, anywhere.

  • @jerseyterry6951
    @jerseyterry6951 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What's that bucket outside the window?

    • @localbod
      @localbod 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's one of the engines. The engines provide the thrust that make the aircraft fly. It's a Boeing 717.
      (edit:typo)

    • @jerseyterry6951
      @jerseyterry6951 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@localbod Rivets and all, looks all pretty primitive

  • @jerseyterry6951
    @jerseyterry6951 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yikes! Do you really trust your life in those things?

    • @vvvxt
      @vvvxt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes you are statistically more likely to crash in a car on the way to the airport

    • @jerseyterry6951
      @jerseyterry6951 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @vvvxt car crashes are usually survivable because of all the safety features that deploy during a crash. There are no such features in a plane. So even if you miraculously survive a plane crash you won't survive all the non supporting blunt force trauma to your entire body, and then there's the fire! Cars are much more survivable

    • @vvvxt
      @vvvxt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      its statistically safer than driving thanks to more stringent recurrent training procedures