How it Works Fat Man Oppenheimer Trinity Atomic Bomb

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ค. 2023
  • Oppenheimer Trinity Test, marked the inception of the implosion-design plutonium, eventually leading to the detonation of the Fat Man atomic weapon, over Nagasaki.
    The outer charge explodes inward, followed by the inner ring of explosives, creating a concave shockwave.
    It moves to the Aluminum pusher, breaking the barren plastic sphere.
    The shockwaves continue toward the uranium-two three eight, It travels further compressing the plutonium sphere and compressing it more.
    Interestingly this was James Tuck idea.
    A British physicist who suggested employing shaped charges as three-dimensional explosive lenses.
    But it was further developed and perfected by Von Neumann, a Hungarian-American mathematician, physicist and computer scientist.
    Instagram
    / aitelly3d
    Twitter
    / aitelly3d
    We make it on Blender
    Download it is free and Safe
    www.blender.org/download/
    Peace Out
    As a Small Channel We encourage you sharing our Videos ,
    But Kindly be advised that any unofficial translations or editing of our work in any medium will be considered a breach of our intellectual property rights.
    Apologies for the Legal Language, This happens because we had faced a lot of Duplicates Contents through Experiences ;)
    This has been a result of Big Channels Duplicating our Contents Ripping our original hard work which we have created from Scratch from Modeling to Rigging to Animation to Rendering.So we had to involved Lawyers.
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 455

  • @zorintoto1167
    @zorintoto1167 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +722

    Can you show us a step by step tutorial how to build one please .

    • @turbopower7308
      @turbopower7308 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +70

      😂😂😂 lol

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +125

      😅

    • @monojitdey2238
      @monojitdey2238 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      Please make video on this

    • @SV2098
      @SV2098 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +76

      Iran wants to know your location

    • @rajareddy391
      @rajareddy391 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      😂😂

  • @azzael321
    @azzael321 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +101

    Clean visuals + very simplified commentary makes a big difference in understanding for us non-academic folks.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      🙏 Your Awesome we tried our best.

  • @Aitelly
    @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Please Subs
    We love you Guys!
    even our Haters too!

  • @twill.AF9002
    @twill.AF9002 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    This was done very well from a scientific perspective! As a retired member of the USAF with hundreds of hours of aircrew time I love it.

  • @TheMau5meister
    @TheMau5meister 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +237

    To think that this was 80 years ago, and we still have people that think the world is flat to this day. Great explanation, thank you!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Your Awesome too 👍 thanks 🙏

    • @vishveshtadsare3160
      @vishveshtadsare3160 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Its not hard

    • @terrancebulong4573
      @terrancebulong4573 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@vishveshtadsare3160 ah yeah I'm sure you and your grandmother can build one out of the scrap in your backyard yah

    • @jpotter2086
      @jpotter2086 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ... and this now a very crude design. We marvel over miniaturization in our electronics, but nukes did it first!

    • @chrismusix5669
      @chrismusix5669 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@vishveshtadsare3160 The engineering is hard. Getting the focused explosives into the right shape, the thicknesses of the layers around the core, and the fuse timing takes a bit of calculation.

  • @thomazbarros9146
    @thomazbarros9146 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    So, the bomb is a football ball 🤣🤣

  • @buckhorncortez
    @buckhorncortez 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The explosive lenses had two different explosives. The outer explosive was Composition B (fast explosive) and then the inner explosive Baratol (slow explosive). Composition B is a mixture of RDX (cyclotiimethylenetrirutiamine) and TNT (trinitrotoluene). Composition B consists of RDX (59.5 %, by mass), TNT (39.5 %) and desensitizing wax (1%). This explosive has a density of 1.70 g/cm3, and a detonation velocity of 8480 m/s. Baratol is a mixture of barium nitrate and TNT. It is 76% barium nitrate and 24% TNT. It has a density of 2.64 grams/cm3 and a detonation velocity of 4900 m/s. The final inner layer of explosives next to the pusher was made of Composition B.

  • @HistoryfortheAges
    @HistoryfortheAges 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    I am a history professor. Saw Oppenheimer and loved it! I am no expert on the science behind all this, so this was a cool video. Thank you! The History of the movie was pretty spot on, but if you wondered how much of the little stories within the movie were true I made a new video on my channel answering many of those questions. Happy to share. Every historical movie embellishes some things, but overall it was a very accurate movie and amazing to watch!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Happy to watch your videos 👍 thanks for your information

    • @ghost307
      @ghost307 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      One science item that I noticed was Oppenheimer giving General Groves his estimate of 3 kilotons for the Trinity test.
      Oppenheimer actually thought that it wouldn't work being their very first attempt.

    • @Rose-jr4tx
      @Rose-jr4tx 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Speaking of history, The fact that the "Christian" West would commit and practice a great many cardinal sins, many of them knowingly, such as centuries-long global;
      - 'Colonization',
      - 'Genocide',
      - 'Slavery',
      - 'Colonialism',
      - 'Global Warming', etc which benefits them enormously for centuries worldwide; then they would initiate and take a measure to ban those practices worldwide, and take credit for it.
      [Note: Today's global warming is caused in large part by nearly two centuries of excessive coal burning, mainly in the West.]
      Christian European Colonization of,
      - North America & South America,
      - Siberia & Far-East Asia,
      - Australia & New Zealand in Asia-Pacific. 😔
      Europe for Native Europeans,
      Africa for Native Africans,
      America for Native Americans,
      Asia-Pacific for Native Asians-Pacific islanders. 🤷

  • @cholaempire
    @cholaempire 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Incredible video. The amount of effort you put into this is amazing

  • @beyondinfinity3876
    @beyondinfinity3876 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    One of the most detailed video about nuxlear weapon!🙏🙏

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thanks 👍

  • @dontmesswiththeriddim2699
    @dontmesswiththeriddim2699 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    These animations (Blender's not that easy to master), and the work you guys put in, AND of course the concise explanations as to what and how it happened is otherworldly! Love your channel and these videos; keep them coming! Subbed for your amazing work that you guys put in ♥
    And yes, I will consult my friendly neighbourhood nuclear physicist too for more; he may or may not be building a bomb to show me how it happens in situ

    • @casedistorted
      @casedistorted 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Still curious if they use AI for the voice narration with some of the weird pronunciations.

  • @user-gd5io7zi9u
    @user-gd5io7zi9u 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Outstanding work as always keep it up . Incredible video. The amount of effort you put into this is amazing.

  • @ahmedaldawood4
    @ahmedaldawood4 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Outstanding work as always keep it up 👍🏻

  • @porfirioErodriguez
    @porfirioErodriguez 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I always like your vids mate... the 2 people behind the animations are top-notch. Always recommend this channel to a fellow TH-cam watcher out there. Great stuff.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Your awesome mate 👍
      Thanks 👍

  • @luisevidal
    @luisevidal 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is an outstanding explanation of this subject. You guys are incredibly good.

  • @kamesh276
    @kamesh276 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome animation explaining the complex concepts. Great work!

  • @YenPitchayen
    @YenPitchayen 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great as always. Nicely done.

  • @claudiocorleone7856
    @claudiocorleone7856 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Unbelievable what these men accomplished . No computers to calculate what then took months to do today those calculations would be done in hours. Total respect.

    • @perniciouspete4986
      @perniciouspete4986 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      "hours"? Do you have a steam-powered computer?

    • @GeoffreyFeldmanMA
      @GeoffreyFeldmanMA 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Seconds, not hours. I wish people would not comment with their unique feelings and personal speculations. Nobody cares if such as you have "total respect". What does "total respect" mean anyway? So - why post?

    • @dontgetmadgetwise4271
      @dontgetmadgetwise4271 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      They did have computers. But your point is not without merit.

    • @luceatlux7087
      @luceatlux7087 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@GeoffreyFeldmanMA While I understand and identify with your feelings, your approach is probably one that would tend to spread a bit of a negative, overcritical regard for our fellow human beings.
      23 people identified with and purportedly enjoyed the sentiment to which you refer. Thus the more appropriate question might be: Why let such a benign expression elicit such disrespect ('No one cares if such as you...)?
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      further reading if you're a reader. if it's some kind of buirden, forget it. "ain't know won gunna reed all that!"
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Just fwiw, I've ultimately come to the conclusion that, with the goal of prioritizing disdain properly and homing in on/understanding those who are TRULY making life worse (and curbing their influence vs helping the better influences), it's best to forgive the smaller things that have basically kindly intentions behind them (eg, this op would likely mostly be an expression to simply connect with others about a harmless emotion of being in awe; a positive regard of another).
      There is SO much ego-driven, incredibly-ill-considered, narrow judgment out there that's PURPOSEFULLY DESIGNED to belittle and spread negativity. So I always try and just silently forgive and forget irritations when people are just being people (sometimes absent-minded, irritating etc).
      If I work through it and understand that the intentions are essentially benevolent, I kinda' see it as a case of not being one of the 'patient zeros' for transmitting the true irritants in life.
      Not to mention, when you have the idiots who love the emotional tone of the intelligent harsher-spirited criticisms, they try to emulate this kind of thing (in an effort to exalt their immature egos) and it comes out as invalid criticisms of everyone they disagree with because they aren't smart enough to deliver valid perspectives or content with their emotional expression... smearing vehement ignorance all over the place.
      I guess I try to identify the intention behind stuff and try to understand what kind of regard it spreads (how des it affect idiots... smart people? average people? youths/immature people? etc)... or not; whatever.
      I try to save my emotionally-based criticisms (as yours is) for the REAL F'Kers who make things suck in life.
      sht... loooong....
      oh well. take it, leave it. just thought i'd share some ideas about the issue.

  • @NicolasPare
    @NicolasPare 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I appreciate your videos immensely. Amazing quality, content is always interesting, just beautifully delivered information It's always a nice surprise to be notified of a new video.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks Nicola Pare we love you guys 🙏

  • @zillsburyy1
    @zillsburyy1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    its crazy how Oppenheimer gets all the credit

    • @krymsun3134
      @krymsun3134 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Nah the movie describes what he did very well.

    • @garrymullins
      @garrymullins 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Someone has to take credit when they're able to move from theory to practice, if the original theorist isn't able to do it.

    • @perniciouspete4986
      @perniciouspete4986 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@krymsun3134Nope. Oppenheimer's most important contribution was reorganizing the project, and the movie didn't say one damned thing about it.

    • @krymsun3134
      @krymsun3134 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@perniciouspete4986 what are you talking about he spent an hour organizing it lmao

  • @aliframdani_
    @aliframdani_ 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Incredibel animation and easy to understand explanation. Love it!

  • @illuzionizhere-bobbyfpv5977
    @illuzionizhere-bobbyfpv5977 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    So freaking awesome (the animation that is)!
    Very good presentation; easy to follow and understand. Keep em coming!! o7

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wit Do

  • @paulhofman
    @paulhofman 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What a beautiful animation. Well done.

  • @BillRau2152
    @BillRau2152 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    It’s amazing they had the technology to make the three different radioactive parts of the device in perfect nested spheres

    • @jakistam1000
      @jakistam1000 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The fact that they are radioactive didn't matter much; they were just metals. As long as you don't exceed the critical mass, you can melt it, hit it with hammers, cut it etc., and it isn't any more dangerous than just standing next to it.

    • @piotrd.4850
      @piotrd.4850 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jakistam1000 well actually, both uranium and plutionium are heavy metals, thus are toxic - and plutoium is particularly vicious. It sheds, is easily to oxidize, is cancerogenic as faq, produces bubbles of hydrogen inside.

  • @johnsmith-hf1hm
    @johnsmith-hf1hm 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Beautiful vidi of the process, nicely stylized. You guys have a future in this biz. Subscribing now.

  • @baotrangia3417
    @baotrangia3417 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much for this animation!

  • @andykay479
    @andykay479 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Amazing video thanks. The thing I would have liked to have seen explained is why the design of the plutonium bomb changed so radically from that of the uranium bomb, but I understand the constraints you face in making this kind of video. More please!

    • @dontgetmadgetwise4271
      @dontgetmadgetwise4271 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Plutonium 239 is much more responsive to stray neutrons. The gun approach would have failed to bring the two components together before the energy released busted the assembly apart. A fizzle.

  • @paulhofman
    @paulhofman 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    At 2:14 'the main fusion material' should be 'the main fission material'. Like Uranium, plutonium was used for nuclear fission, not fusion. Fusion was only used in the later and more potent thermonuclear bombs.

  • @Awesome21
    @Awesome21 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    keep doing great work guys 👍

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks You👍
      Your Awesome

  • @satujie1653
    @satujie1653 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It is fookin awesome..
    Great one mate 👍

  • @Shadobanned4life
    @Shadobanned4life 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent video. Thank You ! 🌞

  • @markgilmore2077
    @markgilmore2077 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great work, please make more

  • @venkatreddy9693
    @venkatreddy9693 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I always love your videos. Great indepth analysis. Can you make the video differentiating the nuclear and non nuclear bombs?

  • @cachito1984
    @cachito1984 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice break down and explanation

  • @channghiem5012
    @channghiem5012 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thanks for this video and explanation!

  • @markchapman2585
    @markchapman2585 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great video really detailed.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks 👍

  • @manikantasriram98
    @manikantasriram98 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Editor deserves a salute

  • @Bluedot1
    @Bluedot1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dear Mr. AiTelly
    You gave a very nice explanation with 3D visuals…
    It is mind-boggling to see the depiction of this type of weapons operating on the earth's surface in a habitable place.... It is the desire of the people of the world to use this science only for creation...
    My thanks to you for making it clear to those who don't know

  • @typerightseesight
    @typerightseesight 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    this is so massive i had to watch it like 5x to understand it for some reason.

  • @Darkosa1234
    @Darkosa1234 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great presentation!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks 👍 Your Great Too

  • @micahtataje
    @micahtataje 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love the video! Gotta do the H-bomb next

  • @RickardoPandiangan
    @RickardoPandiangan 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    the plug was switched, not removed

  • @UntitledJAY_1Q
    @UntitledJAY_1Q 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great channel for my little brother who always ask questions on how things work. He love your channel AiTelly ❤️❤️ keep it up.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Glad your Brother liked it 😁
      Your Awesome

  • @Rarest.Ranger320
    @Rarest.Ranger320 หลายเดือนก่อน

    10/10 step by step tutorial

  • @StrayzKid
    @StrayzKid 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great work

  • @xandervideo1
    @xandervideo1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very interesting, thank you.

  • @fsoiberg
    @fsoiberg 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well done!

  • @ARTIFICIALFAITHOFFICAL
    @ARTIFICIALFAITHOFFICAL 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very well done video 👍

  • @leeread6757
    @leeread6757 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I met Commander Frederick Ashworth at a presentation in Los Alamos in 2005.
    Had an interesting conversation with him after the presentation. He was 93 years old and passed away a few months later.
    He armed the Nagasaki bomb( Fat Man).

  • @darthcheeseburger
    @darthcheeseburger 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing video. I wish they had taken some time to explain the inner workings of the bomb in the film. It would've been helpful to better understand it.

    • @perniciouspete4986
      @perniciouspete4986 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They would have lost 90% of the audience, which has the attention span of butterflies.

  • @laxmidattadeshpande3722
    @laxmidattadeshpande3722 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent video

  • @vivekrohar9485
    @vivekrohar9485 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    amazing sir

  • @Robolaralobarar
    @Robolaralobarar 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very good as usual

  • @samuelmarquez1635
    @samuelmarquez1635 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    WOW!!!! I LOVE YOUR VIDEOS GUYS!

  • @satishstha6317
    @satishstha6317 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome video with amazing detail.Could you please make a video on how a fusion bomb works.....😊😊😊

  • @danielweaver7435
    @danielweaver7435 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good job i know how hard thisust be to animate this stuff i live your stuff

  • @aboutface102
    @aboutface102 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Just watched Oppenheimer, great film. I do wish they had explained the science of the bomb a little more and the politics a little less :)

    • @buckhorncortez
      @buckhorncortez 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The movie was based on the book, "American Prometheus." That book deals with Oppenheimer and his life and not the science of the Project. That's why the science was tangential to the story of Oppenheimer in the movie.

  • @jigdalbhutia8112
    @jigdalbhutia8112 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    You n yr team creativity and dedication to producing high-quality content are truly commendable. It's evident that you put your heart and soul into each video, and that passion shines through in every frame.
    Your videos have not only entertained me but have also broadened my perspective on different subjects. Your thoughtful approach to complex issues has encouraged me to think critically and explore new ideas. God bless

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      God bless you too my friend 🙏
      We love you Guys.

  • @gerthie
    @gerthie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brilliant

  • @GaborGubicza
    @GaborGubicza 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    1:24 why are 5 arming plugs there? I heard that initially all green plugs were inserted which isolated the batteries, then an operator switched all greens to reds connecting the batteries to the circuit. Good stuff guys. Sorry for being a pain in the ass, but after all I'm a research and development engineering manager. Keep up the good work!

    • @perniciouspete4986
      @perniciouspete4986 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, a research and development engineering manager, so you can't help being a pain in the ass. You're forgiven.

  • @lorentzinvariant7348
    @lorentzinvariant7348 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for properly demonstrating the way the neutron causes fission. So many descriptions out there imply the neutron blows apart the nucleus kinetically as it randomly spits and releases neutrons. This is not the case. The neutron gets close enough to be absorbed by the nuclear force that acts at very small distances only. Upon absorption the nucleus becomes unstable and blows apart into specific fragments predefined by the internal dynamics involved also releasing additional neutrons in the process. There is a finite time between neutron absorption and fission.

  • @eramires
    @eramires 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Implosion is the most elegant solution IMO, I loved the Manhattan Project show that explores the development of the method. 🙂

  • @adbell3364
    @adbell3364 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very cool!

  • @pjwarez
    @pjwarez 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ahhhh.. the magic of Blender 3D. Cool!

  • @Phil-D83
    @Phil-D83 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Do one on the castle bravo fusion weapon, and the subsequent salted bomb variants

  • @VIC_TOR_
    @VIC_TOR_ 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you

  • @International_Corn
    @International_Corn 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Imagine dropping the bomb but you forgot to pull off the 3 arming plugs 💀

    • @buckhorncortez
      @buckhorncortez 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The plugs were automatically pulled out when the bomb dropped. They were connected to the plane inside the bomb bay by wires. As the bomb dropped out of the plane when the plugs reached the end of the wires connecting them to the plane, they were pulled out fully arming the bomb. The green plugs separated the arming circuits from the explosives. When the red plugs were put in that gave continuity to the explosives and tests could be run to verify circuit operation. When the red plugs were pulled out, the arming circuits were fully armed in the bomb.

  • @noyfub
    @noyfub 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good Job.

  • @IHORSHCHERBAN
    @IHORSHCHERBAN 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good job.

  • @chadtopia
    @chadtopia 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great video

  • @Martinroot
    @Martinroot 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Really nice video guys...
    An idea for next one: The tsar bomb?

  • @mynameisyasser
    @mynameisyasser 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good stuff

  • @kingqbert6819
    @kingqbert6819 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mind boggling how this was developed!! Harnessing the power of stars in the universe - wow!

    • @perniciouspete4986
      @perniciouspete4986 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fusion is the power of stars, not fission. Think H-bomb versus A-bomb.

  • @tandemcompound2
    @tandemcompound2 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    excellent animation. one tip. slow down. take your time between steps, constructs. let the view had time to adjust and understand. ie make the video 10 minutes long

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ok understood 🙏👍

  • @lsudx479
    @lsudx479 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Oppenheimer was awarded the men's butts discount when he traveled to England.

  • @Suggsonbass
    @Suggsonbass 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ok thanks I'll try this out in my shed. You'll hear about it if it works

  • @mathijeba5375
    @mathijeba5375 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Please make an video about explaining radars
    • how it works
    •why old radars are curved and why new radars are flat
    •how do they find a target how it will know it's range ,the direction it's moving
    •what are the difference between x-band radars, L-band radars and vhf-band radars and how vhf-band radars can deduct stealth fighters and why x-band radars can't
    Literally how it's works please🙏🙏🙏 make it happen please🙏🙏

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      The problem is TH-cam algorithm
      We do not get Views when we make Videos that are not Trending 😔

    • @mathijeba5375
      @mathijeba5375 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Aitelly oh! Thanks or reading my comment I hope you will one day

    • @qiyuxuan9437
      @qiyuxuan9437 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not an expert on radar, but I think the old curved radar has a centralized antenna, so it need a curved dish to reflect the signal to the target direction. The flat panel are phased arry radar, they have many small T/R units that can control its signal direction to a certain degree without physically rotating. Those units can either spread out the signal to cover a large area for search, or combine its power and focusing on a single target to get precise tracking for weapon guidance. The mechanical radar can also perform the same tasks by constantly rotating for search mode, or gimbal lock at the direction of the target for tracking. The biggest advantage for the phased arry radar is, they can switch between the those two modes at very rapid speed, because they dont need to physically rotates. This allows them to have much higher performance in a mode called Track while scan(TWS), which means the radar tracks mutiple known targets, while maintain the ability to detect new targets, which is great for situational awareness on the battlefield.

    • @thecloneguyz
      @thecloneguyz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Unfortunately you have to find somebody else that likes making videos out of love and passion not just quantity of videos for profit

    • @mathijeba5375
      @mathijeba5375 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thecloneguyz no ai telly is a great you tube channel i love this channel because it's the only channel that reads my comment and replies to it
      Unfortunately we need money to make these type of content

  • @seanmarkovich7563
    @seanmarkovich7563 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I thought they removed green plugs and placed in red ones? Or did they just pull three two red on green as shown?

  • @ARKHAMxMaverick
    @ARKHAMxMaverick 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you, I walked away feeling I almost understood this.

  • @SevenDeMagnus
    @SevenDeMagnus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool, thanks sir Oppenheimer.
    God bless.

  • @ramchandramaurya6622
    @ramchandramaurya6622 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Again brilliant video , Best in how it's works . Thanks .... Kindly request to make the same level video on F 35 , especially DAS , data fusion , type tech working .... Thanks a lot ...

  • @omare7475
    @omare7475 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I didn't know soccer balls were that complicated

  • @tomferrin1148
    @tomferrin1148 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another great animation from AiTelly! However, your introductory credits on the development of implosion technology neglect the man most credited with bringing this new science to fruition: George Kistiakowski. He was the man in charge of "X Division" at Los Alamos which was responsible for development of the explosive lens. He apparently was a very hands-on physicist/chemist who was known to work on blocks of RDX explosives in he held in his lap. Not sure how you missed him, but look up his name in Wikipedia and you'll see how important he was to the success of Trinity and Fat Man.

    • @buckhorncortez
      @buckhorncortez 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So was James Tuck who suggested the two-part shaped charges (explosive lenses) with fast and slow explosives that Kistiakowski then worked on. The entire project was a collaboration among a lot of very smart people and not singular events by one person alone. Robert Serber proposed implosion in the "Los Alamos Primer" which everyone coming to work at Los Alamos had to review. Serber's first lecture was in March 1943, long before Kistiakowski worked on the Project.

    • @tomferrin1148
      @tomferrin1148 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The early days at Los Alamos would have been an amazing time to be part of for any scientist or engineer. So many bright minds working collaboratively on one goal and having an almost unlimited budget at their disposal. It all happened a few years before I was born, but I love reading about all the different people and the many ideas they each brought to the table. Thankfully this era of Los Alamos is well documented and makes for much good reading today. I got to visit Los Alamos in 1982 and give a talk about interactive computer graphics. I still vividly remember flying into an airstrip on the top of a nearby plateau in a de Havilland Twin Otter and then getting escorted around like I was royalty. Sadly no pictures of the trip though (cameras not allowed).

  • @MrTastyM7
    @MrTastyM7 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great to watch after watching the movie

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your Awesome 👍😎

  • @jamesboekbinder3967
    @jamesboekbinder3967 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very nicely done! I wonder if there is an overview somewhere of all the work - metallurgy, chemists, physicists, others, who contributed to the creation of the device?

  • @EpicThe112
    @EpicThe112 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Same process as the Little Boy which both weapons require the bombardier/gunner to actually remove the pin. Today's version the Bunker Buster B61-12 strategic B83 uses an arming panel to arm and detonate. Maybe do a Tsar Bomba or the British operation Hurricane nuke bomb. The operation Hurricane bomb works like the Mk90 present day Russian 90R Nuke depth bomb

  • @ttrestle
    @ttrestle 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There’s a few things wrong with this video. For example, Seth came up with the idea. The British dude was the one who came up with the shape charge idea to improve upon the initial concept as up to that point they couldn’t get it to work.

  • @kencreten7308
    @kencreten7308 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fantastic video. Pronounciation: John Von Neumann (Noy-Mahn). Not "pallet." It should be "pellet."

  • @patrikhenriksson7731
    @patrikhenriksson7731 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    hi thanks for the video are u still working on the patria video?

  • @housevil2
    @housevil2 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Common knowledge to us now, but imagine sending this video back in time to 1941.

  • @blackoutalmaty3905
    @blackoutalmaty3905 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Last two videos is very Nice

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks 👍

  • @cookingstreet9362
    @cookingstreet9362 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I bet that AI TELLY will make a full animation movie on Oppenheimer after making 2 atomic bomb videos 😂

  • @rrotstein
    @rrotstein 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The details presented in this video will remain incomprehensible to anyone who does not already understand the physics involved.

    • @YunaAngela
      @YunaAngela 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      One without knowledge in physics clearly doesn’t need to know how to build an atomic bomb, if they cared enough they’d acquire at least a bachelor in physics

  • @communard-mx6rb
    @communard-mx6rb 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    great how to! mine's almost complete

  • @chrislau9835
    @chrislau9835 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice video

  • @Zehnstern
    @Zehnstern 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I need to build a couple of these bombs myself. Make a turorial please.🙏

  • @danipineschi6924
    @danipineschi6924 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    awesome

  • @sriharsha8386
    @sriharsha8386 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool Animation

  • @paprikar
    @paprikar 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Internal neutron initiator is also called "urchin"

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes Agreed 👍

  • @Thebiggestdingus
    @Thebiggestdingus 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My friend: ‘it’s just a prank’! The prank: