I did, battle them out and Earboom amazed me specifically in that price range. At the end of the day Blast sounds more powerful to my ears, not by much though.
Maybe only at 60% volume blast got its sweetspot, I am saying if you only listen close range. The Uboom X can be used from 15 meters away from me, meanwhile I really have to listen to blast at 5 meters.
Are both speaker burned in the same ? Ive noticed my uboom x has improved sound after burning in properly. But i can tell from this video that the tribit has a slight better sound quality overall.
@@heyyeheytvI own 2 uboom x's n owned a blast for about 7 months. Go and watch alan Ross's review comparing the 2. The blast sounds better, sorry. Uboom x comes close but if you have 2 in tws or party mode it stutters when using oluvs EQ's, and you cant make EQ's sound better than oluvs tunings because he has used back door access that the app doesnt allow, hence you cant use in tws or eq over the top of them.
Funny, it should be obvious to anyone watching the video and Mateusz Cholewa's comments describe it perfectly: The EarFun UBOOM X clearly won this comparison. Not that it matters to me, I've had the UBOOM X for a few days now and I'm really excited about it. But I can now also say with a clear conscience that it is not only an excellent speaker, but also that it is the better speaker compared to the Tribit Blast. For the Tribit Blast fanboys, this is certainly a hard pill to swallow. But that's life, progress goes on and the better is the enemy of the good. Don't let this spoil your mood.
In terms of power and higher bass, yes, Earfun surpasses. But in terms of harmony, unfortunately, it needs adjustments. Mainly at 100% due to distortions.
@@jhonnh.7012 I agree with you on this point and am still experimenting with different EQ settings. Personally, however, I've only used the speaker indoors at low to medium volumes so far. For this type of use, I definitely prefer my own EQs to those from Oluv. I generally don't use my speakers at full volume either, but I'm convinced that it's worth optimizing the EQ for this volume range as well.
@@Jota710-4 Es extraño que ni siquiera haya consenso sobre el volumen. Así que me pregunto qué has oído tú. Yo lo oí exactamente como lo describe el autor del vídeo en sus comentarios.
Battery life is rated as the same on both speakers, 30hrs. Uboomx has more bass at higher levels and rolls off a little deeper, but the blast is more accurate sounding at normal listening volumes thanks to its 15w tweeters and bigger passive radiators, as opposed to 10w tweeters and smaller ones on the uboom x The bass on the blast is a little more puncher and tighter while the uboom x is a little looser and deeper Uboom x is a little warmer sounding while blast is a bit more critical although at higher volumes it can get a bit harsh when the bass rolls off, check out alan ross's review comparing the 2 as he has shown frequency response measurements on each speaker at different volumes.
@@Starvinmarvin1111-u4k Now, that's just bullshit, just because tweeters are rated that have more power doesn't mean they are more accurate, also the bass on the blast is less accurate, and less punchy, its kind of bleeded into the track, while the earfun is tighter and has more punch
@@DominikReviews You must have a special model if you think the bass is tighter on the uboom x than the blast, both mine are looser and less punchier than the blast. Even if your own recording you can here it. Just read the comments, theres a reason why people say the blast is a little better and that's because it is in sound quality. Also you cant make an EQ better than oluvs because he has used special access for the speakers not available in the app and you cant use his EQ's in tws or party mode because it stutters.
@@Starvinmarvin1111-u4k Bro, I had listen to both side by side and the difference was obvious, blast was lacking sparkle and whole bass was just somehow bleeded to the track so it was muddy and not tight, also whole the spectrum was somehow dull
W Tribicie spróbuj użyć EQ od Alana Rossa. "V", X-bass i płaski wypadają przy tych ustawieniach blado. Poza tym Earfun brzmi jakby stał za kotarą, taki przytłumiony dźwięk prawie w całym zakresie głośności.
Conforme pude perceber, o Tribit tem um som harmonioso e com mais graves, além de ter mais médios e agudos, o que resulta em uma ótima qualidade de som.
Great comparison video! Particularly good work. Everything is very transparent and easy to comprehend. Many thanks for that!
Was es heute echt für Geile Boxen gibt 😮
Wie immer top Video 😊❤👍
I did, battle them out and Earboom amazed me specifically in that price range. At the end of the day Blast sounds more powerful to my ears, not by much though.
Maybe only at 60% volume blast got its sweetspot, I am saying if you only listen close range.
The Uboom X can be used from 15 meters away from me, meanwhile I really have to listen to blast at 5 meters.
@@pokketa3224Sounds fair, I think both are a good deal at that price. I truly enjoy my Blast and I hate Oluv though.
That's exactly right. thank you for your comment.
Are both speaker burned in the same ?
Ive noticed my uboom x has improved sound after burning in properly. But i can tell from this video that the tribit has a slight better sound quality overall.
Tribit has a muffled sound. How it can be better. If you're an audiophile person, you'll know what is better.
@@heyyeheytvI own 2 uboom x's n owned a blast for about 7 months. Go and watch alan Ross's review comparing the 2. The blast sounds better, sorry. Uboom x comes close but if you have 2 in tws or party mode it stutters when using oluvs EQ's, and you cant make EQ's sound better than oluvs tunings because he has used back door access that the app doesnt allow, hence you cant use in tws or eq over the top of them.
Final verdict
좋네요😂😂
🔊🫡
Funny, it should be obvious to anyone watching the video and Mateusz Cholewa's comments describe it perfectly: The EarFun UBOOM X clearly won this comparison.
Not that it matters to me, I've had the UBOOM X for a few days now and I'm really excited about it. But I can now also say with a clear conscience that it is not only an excellent speaker, but also that it is the better speaker compared to the Tribit Blast.
For the Tribit Blast fanboys, this is certainly a hard pill to swallow. But that's life, progress goes on and the better is the enemy of the good. Don't let this spoil your mood.
In terms of power and higher bass, yes, Earfun surpasses. But in terms of harmony, unfortunately, it needs adjustments. Mainly at 100% due to distortions.
@@jhonnh.7012 I agree with you on this point and am still experimenting with different EQ settings. Personally, however, I've only used the speaker indoors at low to medium volumes so far. For this type of use, I definitely prefer my own EQs to those from Oluv. I generally don't use my speakers at full volume either, but I'm convinced that it's worth optimizing the EQ for this volume range as well.
El tribit tiene mas volumen y bajos mas impactantes 🤷♂️
@@Jota710-4 He oído exactamente lo contrario. 😉
@@Jota710-4 Es extraño que ni siquiera haya consenso sobre el volumen. Así que me pregunto qué has oído tú. Yo lo oí exactamente como lo describe el autor del vídeo en sus comentarios.
Wich is louder and has more bass especially at higher volumes, and what about battery life?
Battery life is rated as the same on both speakers, 30hrs.
Uboomx has more bass at higher levels and rolls off a little deeper, but the blast is more accurate sounding at normal listening volumes thanks to its 15w tweeters and bigger passive radiators, as opposed to 10w tweeters and smaller ones on the uboom x
The bass on the blast is a little more puncher and tighter while the uboom x is a little looser and deeper
Uboom x is a little warmer sounding while blast is a bit more critical although at higher volumes it can get a bit harsh when the bass rolls off,
check out alan ross's review comparing the 2 as he has shown frequency response measurements on each speaker at different volumes.
I haven't tested the battery yet. Earfun has more bass because it shakes the furniture in the house more than Tribit
It is also much louder.
@@Starvinmarvin1111-u4k Now, that's just bullshit, just because tweeters are rated that have more power doesn't mean they are more accurate, also the bass on the blast is less accurate, and less punchy, its kind of bleeded into the track, while the earfun is tighter and has more punch
@@DominikReviews You must have a special model if you think the bass is tighter on the uboom x than the blast, both mine are looser and less punchier than the blast. Even if your own recording you can here it. Just read the comments, theres a reason why people say the blast is a little better and that's because it is in sound quality.
Also you cant make an EQ better than oluvs because he has used special access for the speakers not available in the app and you cant use his EQ's in tws or party mode because it stutters.
@@Starvinmarvin1111-u4k Bro, I had listen to both side by side and the difference was obvious, blast was lacking sparkle and whole bass was just somehow bleeded to the track so it was muddy and not tight, also whole the spectrum was somehow dull
O clássico cópia só não faz igual 👍
W Tribicie spróbuj użyć EQ od Alana Rossa. "V", X-bass i płaski wypadają przy tych ustawieniach blado. Poza tym Earfun brzmi jakby stał za kotarą, taki przytłumiony dźwięk prawie w całym zakresie głośności.
@@PiTi1111 Dziękuję za info👊
Polecam przęsiąść się z słuchania z mikrofalówki na jakieś porządne słuchawki
Conforme pude perceber, o Tribit tem um som harmonioso e com mais graves, além de ter mais médios e agudos, o que resulta em uma ótima qualidade de som.
Tribit sounds reacher, more full. Better balanced and with a deeper bass.
Tribit😊🎉
TRIBIT ❤
For same price range, Tribit wins.