On debating the cowardice of a move: "Honestly, I really love the enterprising nature [of this move]. Just for appearances, what I really want to do is bring the bishop back..." 22:00 -Two Bluds cookin in the lab
I'm definitely going to start slipping in "the enterprising nature of..." into personal and professional vernacular to assert intellectual dominance. It wasn't fun playing against you. You had me shook with that rook pin in the first game. You had me so locked up it felt like is was in coping mode most of the time.
@@HoFoShAo Please accept our humble and mildmannered apologies for that rook swaddle. It's part of our rules after all. Thanks for playing us and being a good sport blud
Great video! Incredibly meek play. I think at 36:57 you missed an even more cowardly move. You could've blocked the check with the light squared sister, pinning the queen, because pieces that can move are scary
Game 1: "Secloistered" is a wonderful addition to the English language, tailored especially for the cowardly chess system. When you were looking at Rf5, I was looking at Bh3... which is at least as stylin wit the sac memes (what does not win material, however, if opponent defends hisselves proper)
Your opponent played extremely well for a 1000 rated player! He's either a smurf or just extremely underrated. He had board awareness well beyond his rating and also showed that he's familiar with some key concepts throughout the game. I'd say he was hanging there pretty well considering the rating difference, but we also need to take into account the enterprising nature of your playing style...
Oh, my ears.... so much samuel harrisment. But seriously, that was very entertaining. Mad props to sir mcsnipish, but sir, you do realize that in game 2, you gave up the chance to oppose the cowards' wall-of-5 on the queenside with a wall-of-6. A rare opportunity, squandered.
On debating the cowardice of a move: "Honestly, I really love the enterprising nature [of this move]. Just for appearances, what I really want to do is bring the bishop back..." 22:00 -Two Bluds cookin in the lab
I'm definitely going to start slipping in "the enterprising nature of..." into personal and professional vernacular to assert intellectual dominance. It wasn't fun playing against you. You had me shook with that rook pin in the first game. You had me so locked up it felt like is was in coping mode most of the time.
@@HoFoShAo Please accept our humble and mildmannered apologies for that rook swaddle. It's part of our rules after all. Thanks for playing us and being a good sport blud
The great horsey migration, now that I see it, was extremely disrespectful
Great video! Incredibly meek play. I think at 36:57 you missed an even more cowardly move. You could've blocked the check with the light squared sister, pinning the queen, because pieces that can move are scary
Saw that move when rewatching. Such a fearfully aesthetic move great find!
You guys should do a crossword together
can do mr chublet
I would enjoy a match against you fellas sometime
Send us a message! We would be happy to play you
Game 1: "Secloistered" is a wonderful addition to the English language, tailored especially for the cowardly chess system. When you were looking at Rf5, I was looking at Bh3... which is at least as stylin wit the sac memes (what does not win material, however, if opponent defends hisselves proper)
Bh3 is a zesty lil tactish
Your opponent played extremely well for a 1000 rated player! He's either a smurf or just extremely underrated. He had board awareness well beyond his rating and also showed that he's familiar with some key concepts throughout the game. I'd say he was hanging there pretty well considering the rating difference, but we also need to take into account the enterprising nature of your playing style...
Yeah we were both super impressed! Subscribing to the channel clearly gives you a several hundred point rating boost - it is known.
Oh, my ears.... so much samuel harrisment. But seriously, that was very entertaining. Mad props to sir mcsnipish, but sir, you do realize that in game 2, you gave up the chance to oppose the cowards' wall-of-5 on the queenside with a wall-of-6. A rare opportunity, squandered.
Wall-of-6 beats wall-of-5 nearly sometimes always. A curious decision by Big Snipe to be sure