SpaceX: A Grift Of Planetary Proportions

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ส.ค. 2024
  • Check out our video about Destiny Tech 100 on our second channel Broken Business Models: • DXYZ, The New Way To I...
    In this video we critically analyze Elon Musk's private space company SpaceX and its ambitions to colonize Mars.
    Free and premium investor resources, check out our website: www.differentiatedanalytics.com/
    For inquires related to Differentiated Analytics email us at: founder@woodandwoodenterprises.com
    Check out our second channel Broken Business Models where we discuss unusual or otherwise suspect businesses that may be unviable: / @brokenbusinessmodels
    For business inquires: Mary@creatormanager.co
    For other inquiries: Wallstreetmillennial@gmail.com
    Check out our new podcast on Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/4UZL13d...
    All materials in these videos are used for educational purposes and fall within the guidelines of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. If you are or represent the copyright owner of materials used in this video and have a problem with the use of said material, please send me an email, wallstreetmillennial.com, and we can sort it out.
    #Wallstreetmillennial #spacex #elonmusk
    ------------------------------
    Buddha by Kontekst / kontekstmusic
    Creative Commons - Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported - CC BY-SA 3.0
    Free Download / Stream: bit.ly/2Pe7mBN
    Music promoted by Audio Library • Buddha - Kontekst (No ...
    ------------------------------
    0:00 - 1:41 Intro
    1:42 - 5:05 SpaceX history
    5:06 - 11:00 Colonization of Mars
    11:01 The greater fool
  • ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน

ความคิดเห็น • 1.4K

  • @wallstreetmillennial
    @wallstreetmillennial  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Check out our video about Destiny Tech 100 on our second channel Broken Business Models: th-cam.com/video/9fgWGr-yS2Q/w-d-xo.htmlsi=q_XI23QiSGQ7OWMz

    • @Av-vd3wk
      @Av-vd3wk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      “GRIFT” - Whaaaat sorry man but you’re wrong on this one. Love your stuff but you obviously have some sort of bias here.
      So you don’t believe Elon is sincere in his ultimate goal? If you do, then how the F can you call what he is doing a grift?
      This guy has achieved more than you and I times 1,000 ever could.
      Changed the Space industry, the car industry, heck with Neuralink and Tesla bot too.
      That not good enough? What more do you expect from him??

    • @GahMehGrrrr
      @GahMehGrrrr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The logistics for any Mars flight doesn't add up. Starship can't get to low E orbit unloaded. Nasa now admit it would take at least 16 starship to refuel one to go to Mars. Unworkable

    • @gbpg2016
      @gbpg2016 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Would love to get your analysis of Aptera.

    • @onsokumaru4663
      @onsokumaru4663 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Spacex haven't met the Nasa artemis project deadline. They were contracted to build a luna landing shuttle and Musk decided to build an unnecessary biggest spaceship just so that he can brag that he has the biggest rocket. So he bit more than he can chew and now they've been failing with every test launches blowing up rockets, wasting money. Nasa has paused funding to Spacex as a result of their incompetence. The Common Sense Skeptic channel has a well researched series of videos on this topic.

  • @recordbutton1845
    @recordbutton1845 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +226

    He's in Texas now. He's already half way to Mars.

  • @caracallaavg
    @caracallaavg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +636

    You know Wall Street Millennial isn't fucking around when the background music is off

    • @chiquita683
      @chiquita683 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      Space exploration has been the worlds biggest grift since the 1960s. To believe we can explore space when we cant explore our oceans is outrageous

    • @CarbinKid
      @CarbinKid 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@chiquita683 I 100% agree with you

    • @1voluntaryist
      @1voluntaryist 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chiquita683 "We"? You mean the rulers, the govt. which produces NOTHING except false promises? Yes, that grift has been going since cities began. And continues to be "The Most Dangerous Superstition" (Larken Rose). No progress happens in the public sector. See the US space program that went to the moon and gave us "Tang". All progress is achieved by free people, freely acting to realize their dreams, e.g., Elon Musk raising money without taxation (theft), and creating value we all enjoy, while working toward species expansion into space that stopped 55 years ago. He and his engineers have done more than all the governments put together.

    • @Heyu7her3
      @Heyu7her3 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      ​@@chiquita683 water pressure is heavier

    • @DoctorBiobrain
      @DoctorBiobrain 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      ⁠@@chiquita683But we can explore the oceans, we just choose not to do it more.
      And space travel is actually easier than dealing with the depths of the oceans. The hardest part about space is just getting up there. Once an object is in proper orbit it can stay there indefinitely. Or we can shoot things into deep space just by making them go faster. In fact, one reason Musk’s Mars mission is bad is the likelihood they miss Mars and the ship ends up as a permanent tomb orbiting the Sun.
      But the pressure involved in space is just normal air pressure. Pressure in the deep ocean is far higher and more dangerous, like we saw in the Titan sub. A tiny hole in a spaceship is easily repairable, since it’s just normal air pressure pushing out. A tiny hole in the deep ocean is instant death.

  • @rossamullen5918
    @rossamullen5918 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1026

    We'll see who is laughing when we're driving our robo-taxis on Mars generating annual return of 100%.

    • @hydoffdhagaweyne1037
      @hydoffdhagaweyne1037 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +109

      😂😂😂😂

    • @phdonme1
      @phdonme1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +123

      We're hyperloops will take us everywhere

    • @MuhammadImHardBruceLee
      @MuhammadImHardBruceLee 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

      @rossamullen5918 Sarcasm, right?

    • @newyorkvisionary
      @newyorkvisionary 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      @@MuhammadImHardBruceLeeObviously

    • @jamesevans8520
      @jamesevans8520 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Indeed 🤣

  • @Colombiaguapo
    @Colombiaguapo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +172

    Just so people understand how stupid the idea of colonizing Mars is, Antarctica during the worst winter storm or the Sahara desert during the hottest day in the summer is still more habitable than mars on its best day. We can’t even build a self sustaining environment in these locations right here on earth.

    • @Paul_Wetor
      @Paul_Wetor 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Not to mention the difficulty of getting there.

    • @jorgsobota2228
      @jorgsobota2228 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly 👍.
      If the test habitat fails on Earth you can get out and at least breathe with help not far away. On Mars everyone involved is fucked - and that's why Elmo will never get there. Suffocating is for peasants...

    • @cherrypoutines6269
      @cherrypoutines6269 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      And if anything fails, it's possibly life or death. It's not like they can say, "oh well, let go home then"

    • @steve7814
      @steve7814 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Also if we can not even keep our own planet healthy, is pretty said that some peoples hubris assumes we can "terraform" a desolate planet.

    • @coldspring22
      @coldspring22 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Once Mankind has sizable presence on Moon and mastered living in deep space, growing food in deep space and manufacturing everything away from Earth, then we can think about going to Mars. But to go to Mars now and make self sustaining colony there is like a new born baby trying to climb top of Mt. Everest. It's just ridiculous.

  • @trj1442
    @trj1442 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +303

    If the worst case scenario happens in my lifetime, I'd still rather live on a post apocalyptic Earth than freezing my ass off on the Mars wasteland.

    • @jonasdauerbrenner6432
      @jonasdauerbrenner6432 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      100%

    • @andrewsittermann2081
      @andrewsittermann2081 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Read Stark by Ben Elton, about a bunch of rich people who try to escape a dying earth for the moon. Rather prescient

    • @jonasdauerbrenner6432
      @jonasdauerbrenner6432 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@andrewsittermann2081 will do, thx

    • @pauldacus4590
      @pauldacus4590 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Me too. Earth will ALWAYS be the best place in our solar system for humans. I think Musky is about perpetuating our species if there's a giant asteroid strike.... but he can't raise money on a catastrophic obliteration of Earth.

    • @veganbutcherhackepeter
      @veganbutcherhackepeter 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Mars is like the worst case scenario of a post apocalyptic Earth. Without a magnetic field, too.
      I can't wait for Elon Musk sitting in a Martian cave in a space suit trying to grow potatoes from his 💩.

  • @hack45993
    @hack45993 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +149

    spacex has a fiduciary responsibility to make earth uninhabitable 😂

    • @linmal2242
      @linmal2242 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think you have missed the point of SpaceX. Supervolcanoes or an asteroid impact are the serious natural hazards that are most likely to make Earth uninhabitable. They have happened in the past and will happen again. One is currently rumbling directly under Naples called Campi Flegrei and the Italian government is in panic mode!

    • @jennessacard4796
      @jennessacard4796 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😭😭😭😭😭

    • @-MeatsOfEvil-
      @-MeatsOfEvil- หลายเดือนก่อน

      I hope so!😉

  • @franklinbromberg6687
    @franklinbromberg6687 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +196

    I couldn't stop breaking out laughing at the deep analysis of how crappy it would be to live on Mars

    • @justicedemocrat9357
      @justicedemocrat9357 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      OMG so hilarious.

    • @mmmikeyyy
      @mmmikeyyy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      Yep... Just like Antarctica, except... no water, no food, no air. The dream is to have humanity present elsewhere in the solar system in case it's wiped out by some catastrophic event on Earth. So the Mars colony should be self-sufficient. This necessarily implies mining, metallurgy, glass making, plastics, electronics, etc. Come to think of it, it might be simpler than we think: robots are just around the corner!! All that's needed is a few tweaks on the FSD software! I swear it's not complicated! We can do it today!

    • @eternaldarkness3139
      @eternaldarkness3139 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Thunderf00t & Common Sense Skeptic are great YT channels.

    • @موسى_7
      @موسى_7 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      ​@@mmmikeyyy
      Antarctica has penguins. A good enough reason to live on Antarctica. Not like Mars.

    • @user-nm9qd6bo6h
      @user-nm9qd6bo6h 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mmmikeyyy Someone's gotta get the ball rolling, dumbass.

  • @BorisEysbroek
    @BorisEysbroek 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

    We haven't even managed to keep people on the moon permanently. Why would he think a planet 283.07 million km away would even be remotely realistic with our current technology?

    • @Rio.Motel.84
      @Rio.Motel.84 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      He's scamming the gullible. He can't believe himself how much BS people can consume.

    • @Colombiaguapo
      @Colombiaguapo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      We can’t even build a self sustaining colony in the most uninhabitable locations right here on earth ie Antartica or the middle of the Sahara. That’s how silly this idea of colonizing another planet is

    • @CTembo
      @CTembo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      “We” you mean the government? This is a private entity

    • @milescoleman910
      @milescoleman910 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No one is trying to build self sustaining colonies on Antarctica. In fact it is against all international law. People live there for years at a time. It does create its own energy and oxygen I believe.
      The moon does not have the resources that mars has. Like, an atmosphere. Accessible water and regolith. While a colony will be placed there and will be as self sustaining as it needs to be within the next 50 years. There is little purpose to a self sustaining colony in domes on a rock that cannot be terraformed. The purpose of the moons colony will be providing a way station and fueling stop for the missions to Mars and Europa and Titan within a century after. The moon is a gas station full of Helium 3 for exploring the solar system.
      A self sustaining terrarium could be plopped onto Antarctica tomorrow. ( In fact there is probably several there already. ) or to the moon, or mars for very little cost. But a colony with a future only lies in terraforming and the construction of plans and support for terraforming.

    • @jameskelly3502
      @jameskelly3502 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @CTembo Private companies need to make a profit.
      There's no way to make money with a colony on Moon or Mars.

  • @wbwarren57
    @wbwarren57 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

    You missed a couple crucial points that make this even more certain to be a grift:
    1. What are the key aspects of Elon‘s plans for bars is to generate fuel from the Martian atmosphere and water under the Martian surface to power of the starship for return flights. However, there is no pilot plant for this activity on earth yet. It would be much easier to do this on earth because the atmospheric pressure is so much higher and there’s abundant water and yet there’s no prototype plant yet.
    2. There is no prototype of what an initial Martian comedy would actually consist of. If you don’t have a prototype of what an initial Martian colony would consist of, how do you know how much stuff you have to bring from the earth to Mars to establish one? The fact that such a prototype does not exist means that the starship as far as being a mars vehicle really has no solid requirements to, use as the basis of sound engineering.

    • @HaviccB
      @HaviccB 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      2. While I agree that The Martian Arts will be important someday, let's worry about colonies first 😛

    • @Zackzickel
      @Zackzickel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are no prototypes or anything for the spaceships to Mars either.

    • @MemeMan_MEMESQUAD
      @MemeMan_MEMESQUAD 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Terraform Industries is a couple prototypes deep, and they'll probably be fully commercial by the time there's a demand on Mars

    • @ublade82
      @ublade82 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are ignoring like 40 years of work by the Mars Society and others exploring these questions
      The sabatier reaction works, it was discovered a long time ago, it's been demonstrated. There's CO2 and hydrogen on Mars in water. There's also dirt on Mars but nobody is trying to make fuel from it which would require demonstration in a way the sabatier reaction doesn't because it's already been demonstrated robustly.

    • @wbwarren57
      @wbwarren57 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@HaviccB
      "If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there." Building a spaceship to go to Mars when you don't have any sort of feasible plan for actually going to Mars and colonizing it seems to be the height of bad business judgement. Or, as the kids say "Elon Genius!".

  • @wbwarren57
    @wbwarren57 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    Is it possible that Elon has based his entire business model off of the underwear Gnomes made popular by South Park? First step, you steal all the underwear. Third step, profit. Of course, neither Elon nor anyone else knows what the second step is.

    • @dong9514
      @dong9514 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No, he improved it. Instead of collecting underwear he collected money. Collect money equals profit.

    • @wbwarren57
      @wbwarren57 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@dong9514
      You are almost correct. For Elon step two is collect money and step three is make profit. You forgot the first most crucial step that Elon always engages in, which is to make absolutely wild promises that are completely impossible to fulfill, but that excite people. Once you’ve done that people will give you money. Note that there is no step four where promises are kept. That is vital! That would spoil the whole plan!

    • @roscoedash6673
      @roscoedash6673 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes dude that’s the joke. Elon very much has a “hello fellow children, I too watch South Park and Rick n Morty!” style of humor.

  • @philippe4106
    @philippe4106 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +352

    If Musk is so obsessed with going to Mars, why did he spend $20 billion of his own money on Twitter?

    • @Boomereng-cb34
      @Boomereng-cb34 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +116

      So he can have a platform to pump his meme stocks and BS hype of Tesla and his business grifts.

    • @anjelica948
      @anjelica948 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +126

      Trust me, he didn’t want to. He kind of got twisted into it by his own hubris.

    • @ChevBling
      @ChevBling 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cause he wouldn't be able to do it if the democrats controlled every outlet

    • @eternaldarkness3139
      @eternaldarkness3139 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +77

      F*ck around, Find out. Well, he found out.

    • @kaminakaminakaminakamina
      @kaminakaminakaminakamina 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

      @@anjelica948 By his own big mouth being stuck in the law books.

  • @AvocadoAfficionado
    @AvocadoAfficionado 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +122

    Space X is Musk's private inner circle Xenu tier. You only get to invest if you're a true institutional Elon stan.

    • @pikkuporsas
      @pikkuporsas 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      How come I own shares then? Honestly, it’s not hard that hard. Some publically traded mutual funds have spacex shares too.

    • @AvocadoAfficionado
      @AvocadoAfficionado 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      ​@@pikkuporsasimagine thinking you're on the same level as Sequoia and Thiel.
      Amazing.

  • @tobuslieven
    @tobuslieven 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +71

    They are trying to own a planet. I don't think the phrase "future cashflows" really captures the enormity of it.

    • @chiquita683
      @chiquita683 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Where is the army to control it? A lot of countries "owned" America before it was America and now they dont

    • @rishisunak2024
      @rishisunak2024 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @tobuslieven Please read what you just wrote.
      No cash, no company... No company, no assets... No assets, no return for investors...
      Meanwhile Musk will be off marketing the CyperLoop and HyperTruck, with deliveries to Mars in 2125...

    • @nicholasgutierrez9940
      @nicholasgutierrez9940 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Owning a planet is useless for our needs. It's better to mine asteroids for resources. As a colony though, it's priceless. But people won't pay for priceless. I seriously doubt a private company can actually do anything useful by themselves. NASA had to get all the major companies to come together to make something to go to space. Space X could be a first step, but it's not the end. I hope.

    • @harm991
      @harm991 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Why can't people believe that humanity will finish itself off here on Earth. Where's the backup?

  • @s4098429
    @s4098429 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    It’s not grift if he’s upfront about it.
    People who invest in such things have only themselves to blame.

    • @vonmitchell264
      @vonmitchell264 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sorry but Elon’s only upfront after getting investors money. While he’s begging he’s making completely different statements than he’s making now after he can’t keep playing the “fake it till I make it “ strategy. There’s a reason he’s currently being investigated for multiple forms of fraud at the moment.

    • @vonmitchell264
      @vonmitchell264 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You should watch all of Elon’s investor presentations for all his different companies, they’re all filled with failed promises and just flat out lies. But yes I blame people for trusting someone like Elon with his track record

    • @ProuvaireJean
      @ProuvaireJean 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not all investments are made with the expectation of a financial return. Sometimes people invest in a venture because they believe in its superordinate purpose.

    • @ii8283
      @ii8283 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@ProuvaireJean This is the biggest cope I've ever heard. That wouldn't be an investment, that would be a charitable donation. Investments are explicitly for financial gain. Buy whatever stock you want but you're trying to convince yourself you're some high-minded paragon and that it's fine you lost all your money because you're working towards some kind of fantastical project that'll somehow save the huamn race

    • @GnomeChomskyOG
      @GnomeChomskyOG 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He just keeps inventing milestones out of thin air without any actual evidence that they're attainable in order to woo investors. That's a grift.

  • @k.chriscaldwell4141
    @k.chriscaldwell4141 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    E. V. Barnum at it again.

  • @bubba99009
    @bubba99009 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    10s of billions is nothing - 10s of trillions is a more believable amount. Zuck spend 10s of billions just creating a video game with terrible graphics and no gameplay.

    • @stuartburns8657
      @stuartburns8657 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What game was that?

    • @kokorosyume
      @kokorosyume 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@stuartburns8657I believe they are referring to the meta verse 🙇🏾‍♀️ which is nightmare fuel lmao

    • @stuartburns8657
      @stuartburns8657 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@kokorosyume Oh. I see. Actually quite a fan of the Quest VR headsets personally, but yes not seen nor bothered by a Metaverse

  • @schrodingersjet1043
    @schrodingersjet1043 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I would love to go to Mars........ if I already had a terminal illness.

  • @individual1-floridaman491
    @individual1-floridaman491 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    Place your bets - which Musk enterprise will result in the biggest destruction of wealth: Tesla or SpaceX?

    • @Boredblacksheep
      @Boredblacksheep 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      TwitterX

    • @island97
      @island97 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Neither . They both have the capability of being trillion dollar companies if they execute .....they usually do.

    • @موسى_7
      @موسى_7 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Tesla actually sells cars, and if they go bankrupt, other companies can use their technology.

    • @simeon8360
      @simeon8360 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      ​@island97 Really?
      Semi is a failure. The roadster promised has not materialised. The model 2 is not going to happen. We were promised 1 million robo taxis by 2020. We were promised 30k revenue per year from our model 3s. We were told that the cybertruck was the best car Tesla had produced.
      The only delivery I'm seeing is of lies.

    • @island97
      @island97 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@simeon8360 how is the semi a failure ? Let's start there

  • @BlackJesus8463
    @BlackJesus8463 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

    Humanity probably cant survive without earth.

    • @sandran17
      @sandran17 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's a scary thought

    • @Clickbait540
      @Clickbait540 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s why humanity will evolve

    • @chrisdonish
      @chrisdonish 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@@sandran17why is it so scary? As much as people love to believe they are god, we can't destroy the earth nor make it unhabitable. No reason to think we need to leave to survive.

    • @electrified0
      @electrified0 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In the grand scheme of things, we're a spec of dust in the history of Earth, which is itsef a spec in the universe. It's fun to pretend we're the protagonist of the universe, especially when we bend glass and sand in clever ways to see far beyond our reach, but the physical limitations of our fragile bodies and lifespans puts a very short distance on how far we can go even if we solve every logistical challenge of space travel.

    • @skierpage
      @skierpage 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@chrisdonish we don't have to be gods to drive species to extinction, including possibly our own. We're already causing the sixth mass extinction in Earth's history by reducing and degrading wilderness areas and by causing the exceptionally rapid warming that we've undeniably observed in recent decades. The latter may result in crossing tipping points that lead to accelerating and unstoppable warming, and over centuries Earth becomes a deadly hothouse planet like Venus. It's probably an unlikely outcome because we would surely come to our senses in time; but we've yet to reduce our greenhouse emissions despite decades of warnings about very bad outcomes.
      I don't know if a complete exchange of all nuclear weapons would leave Earth uninhabitable.
      The more likely outcome is only hundreds of millions of people die from environmental catastrophes or a nuclear missile exchange.

  • @user-hx1sp2zu6p
    @user-hx1sp2zu6p 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +118

    A moment of silence for Tesla bagholders

    • @pikkuporsas
      @pikkuporsas 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      lol- why? I’m up close to 2 million today.

    • @markmercieca5569
      @markmercieca5569 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Hahahahaha.....Yes, I love holding my bag with 1000% returns.

    • @roberthernandez5802
      @roberthernandez5802 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Hey that's kind of cool it translates bag holders to backers.

    • @Daedcicar
      @Daedcicar 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@pikkuporsassure you are 😂

    • @pikkuporsas
      @pikkuporsas 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Daedcicar I know you don't believe me, but do you think I care? my average cost basis is $28 per share, that's why I found the comment funny. I think I'm typical for those with more than a mil in TSLA

  • @robertclark3258
    @robertclark3258 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Setting up a colony on Mars (any time soon, at least) is a deadly pipedream.

    • @TheJustinJ
      @TheJustinJ 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Robots can assemble structures remotely. Mars contains a lot of carbon dioxide. And iron. And sunlight. It has abundance that can be tapped by humanity if they so choose.

  • @user-hd4jc1ct8q
    @user-hd4jc1ct8q 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Why go to Mars? You can get to Idaho by road or scheduled air travel.

    • @TheJustinJ
      @TheJustinJ 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      If you ask the questions "what are the biggest problems facing humanity" this leads you to develop green technology and mars expeditions. It is a logical and rational decision if asking those questions.

  • @muradtalukdar4401
    @muradtalukdar4401 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    "Imagine Enron in space"

  • @SolidLiquidFox
    @SolidLiquidFox 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    It's amazing how we humans are so not self-aware of our mortality. Chances are none of us are going to see any of these plans come to fruition. Even if the logic was sound in executing those plans with progress moving steady with tangible results towards colonization.

  • @urbanyeti5233
    @urbanyeti5233 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    The 44 year old side of my brain!!
    “Yeah who the hell would want to go to Mars?”
    The 9 year olds side of my brain!
    “Me me me me me”

  • @reprovedcandy
    @reprovedcandy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

    Wait, you're telling me SpaceX isn't valued based on fundamentals? Boy, I never would've guessed. He has no other companies that deny the laws of financial physics that I can think of.

    • @TheJustinJ
      @TheJustinJ 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Starlink is a spaceX company. Starlink and spaceX have more satellites in orbit currently, than all other satellites launched in human history. They provide extremely high compute and reliable internet speeds in impossible to reach areas. And they are impossible for a bank to repossess.

  • @softwarephil1709
    @softwarephil1709 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    With the radiation on Mars, people would have to live underground. Growing food and recycling water underground would be difficult.

    • @davidbrayshaw3529
      @davidbrayshaw3529 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You've got to get to Mars without suffering from the effects of radiation exposure before you worry about living under ground. Six months without an Ionosphere and magnetosphere
      surrounding you is a long time.

    • @DominikPlaylists
      @DominikPlaylists 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is just hugely exaggerated. If you spend 2 hours outside in the sun you will need 120 years to be exposed to 1 Sievert of radiation which is considered an unhealthy dose. This is as much exposure as an average air crew. If you spend 2 hours in the sun per day in the sun in Singapore or Brazil the UV light will actually cause more damage to your body than radiation on Mars.

    • @johnhutchinson7343
      @johnhutchinson7343 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't know why, but I always obsess about the gravity the most. Mars gravity is 38% of Earth. Prolonged low gravity can't be good for the human body, right? And it's not like that can be engineered away. Gravity is a constant.

    • @softwarephil1709
      @softwarephil1709 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johnhutchinson7343 There are many problems with colonizing Mars. Gravity is a problem, oxygen is a problem, radiation is a problem (cancer and genetic defects), Mars dust is fine and prone to stick to everything due to static electricity, power is a problem (unless you have big solar arrays, which are subject to being covered with dust), and, social isolation is a big problem, supply is a problem since the good launch window occurs only once every 27 months, and you'll need good medical facilities including surgery, multiple doctors to care for each other, dental care, drugs, etc.

    • @DominikPlaylists
      @DominikPlaylists 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@softwarephil1709 I bet you anything that even with all these issues a surgery on Mars will be cheaper than in the US. And power will be cheaper than in Germany.

  • @jayliu645
    @jayliu645 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Seems you guys doing research, you did carvana back a while ago, what happened now? May be it is good to do some postmortem analysis and see if your analysis stand test of time. Always good to learn if you are serious about investing.

    • @MuhammadImHardBruceLee
      @MuhammadImHardBruceLee 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @jayliu645 Give it 18 months for the revenue round-tripping to end... Over in Europe, a similar company to Carvana called 'Cazoo' just went under, less than three years after their SPAC event.

    • @ccrider8483
      @ccrider8483 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Jayliu, if you think Carvana is a good investment, go for it. I don't think selling overpriced used cars via the internet will be successful long-term, or post pandemic(?).

  • @ArktosBears
    @ArktosBears 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    I don't know why investors ever tolerated dual class share structures. It seems like it has nothing but downsides for them.

    • @nowayoutalive8732
      @nowayoutalive8732 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You have to tolerate that with many great investments. Meta, for example.

    • @qwerty112311
      @qwerty112311 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Because they like money. And those that invested in SpaceX have made a whole lot of it.

    • @YoosufMuneer
      @YoosufMuneer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Meta, Google and a ton of other companies have it.

    • @LarsLarsen77
      @LarsLarsen77 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@YoosufMuneer I'd rather chew glass than own either of them. Bitcoin DEMOLISHES their gains.

    • @princemc35
      @princemc35 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@LarsLarsen77Woah buddy slow down
      You don't know what Glass can do to you

  • @phdonme1
    @phdonme1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Bruno Mars mission will be the equivalent of going to prison
    Like a supermax prison

    • @blubb7711
      @blubb7711 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Including human experiments.

    • @donragnar8430
      @donragnar8430 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Like Bruno Mars himself, the completion of the mission will fall short

    • @user-wp2wi1hb7y
      @user-wp2wi1hb7y หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@blubb7711exactly! At least on Earth, there still is a chance to escape and there are ways for others to find out about the abuse and take action. Imagine the horrors that will be sure to come in these self contained , inescapable habitats. And the ways to torture someone, in such extreme environments.

  • @goldeneastgun
    @goldeneastgun 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    None of us are gonna be around to see this happen, including Elon. He's a rich kid with a 1950’s sci-fi magazine... Hyperloop, solar roof, robot cars 🤣🤣🤣 Okaaaay, Elon... put down the magazine. It's time for bed so say g'nite.

    • @eternaldarkness3139
      @eternaldarkness3139 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hyperloop: first published for 1904 Worlds Fair. Musk hijacked the idea in an attempt to derail the purposed light rail in San Francisco (iirc) He wanted people buying Tesla's, not train tickets. (Pretty sure he actually admitted to this.)
      Solar Roof: 2.6 Billion dollar bail out for his Cousins after Musk tricked Shareholders into buying bonds of that company (I forget if it was Tesla, or SpaceX but it would have bankrupted them) Roof tiles during press conference reveal... were all fake, just plastic.
      Self Driving cars: fElon is currently under investigation by: DOJ, SEC, & NHSTA over his decade old claims of it being ready "very soon" BTW: Robo-Taxis are coming next year!
      Everything else... not any better.

    • @thezyg6311
      @thezyg6311 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It's all in Total Recall, literally every idea he has had is in that film.

    • @DominikPlaylists
      @DominikPlaylists 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In the meantime China already has 430GW of solar panels, and 70000km of high speed rail and at least some robotic taxis and buses in the 10 biggest cities.

  • @derek04151
    @derek04151 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    How about a Martian Penal Colony ?
    I could get behind that.

  • @uniaguilar
    @uniaguilar 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    In getting the sense that this channel does not like Elon

    • @eternaldarkness3139
      @eternaldarkness3139 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      "I'm sick of people appearing to be good, while doing evil. F*ck those people!"
      --Elon Musk talking about Elon Musk

    • @davidbrayshaw3529
      @davidbrayshaw3529 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      He does seem to have somewhat of an intolerance for fraudsters and conmen, doesn't he.

    • @YoosufMuneer
      @YoosufMuneer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidbrayshaw3529 Except he's retarded in this case. His premise is flawed since SpaceX has been doing share buy backs twice a year for years at this point.

    • @proletar1660
      @proletar1660 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, WSM debunks fraudsters and failed businesses. No wonder Elon is in here.

    • @tonii5690
      @tonii5690 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Whatever anyone thinks of Elon I am just enjoying the technological advancements. Who else has reusable rockets? I remember the critics regarding reusable rockets when SpaceX was still working on it. Once it works the critics go on to criticize something else.

  • @orkin2525
    @orkin2525 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Did Thunderfoot help with this episode?

  • @bobz1736
    @bobz1736 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Mars Mission - what a waste of time, money, and resources 😢

    • @TheJustinJ
      @TheJustinJ 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Humanity will go extinct on Earth.
      If not by an asteroid then by nuclear warfare. China has amassed a large quantity of nukes and is not interested in signing the non-proliferation deal with the US and Russia. And they are very unstable and corrupt with warring factions ready to pounce when Xi is gone.

  • @bababoy91
    @bababoy91 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    SpaceX is a very good company but Elon overhypes things and it is becoming a pattern.

  • @Tauasa
    @Tauasa 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    No chance anybody gets to Mars before we destroy ourselves

  • @phdonme1
    @phdonme1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I was waiting for you to do this one

  • @rishisunak2024
    @rishisunak2024 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +95

    If 'Elon Musk' were a fragrance, it would cost $1,000 per bottle and smell like nothing...

    • @justwatchinguboob
      @justwatchinguboob 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This

    • @Boomereng-cb34
      @Boomereng-cb34 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      It would smell like a fart

    • @cycleistic1365
      @cycleistic1365 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      It would smell like rotten muskrat.

    • @proletar1660
      @proletar1660 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Ironically, we Arabs have a fragrance named "Musk" and it somewhat smells like the fragrance you use on a dead corpse before burying it.

    • @platoscavealum902
      @platoscavealum902 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      📉 The perfume would be called:
      *eXLon smeLL*

  • @nameblocked
    @nameblocked 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Fraudzad, "Tom Nash" and Creating Your Money Problems of the Boy Band Elon's Musk would disagree 😏

    • @donragnar8430
      @donragnar8430 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So would InverseAnswers

  • @jamesbootman1149
    @jamesbootman1149 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Investors are banking on the residual values of SpaceX and Starlink assets after Musk is done using those assets will be significantly more than the amount they are investing today. What is the value of 1,000 mission proven reusable Starships? What is the value of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 Block 5 fleet? 1,000 Starships gotta be worth 1,000 times that.

  • @adamalton2436
    @adamalton2436 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

    Common Sense Skeptic did a great video about how unsustainable the SpaceX business model is.

    • @eternaldarkness3139
      @eternaldarkness3139 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Great channel. Thunderf00t is more... stylized, but also worth watching.

    • @AlanTheBeast100
      @AlanTheBeast100 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      With unfounded assumptions you can do anything.

    • @YoutubeBorkedMyOldHandle_why
      @YoutubeBorkedMyOldHandle_why 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@AlanTheBeast100 "With unfounded assumptions" and loads of cool pr graphics "you can do anything." ;-)

    • @philliptemple9841
      @philliptemple9841 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      It's already profitable therefore sustainable. Appears he was wrong.
      Phillip.

    • @qwerty112311
      @qwerty112311 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lmao SpaceX is raking in dough and the side project starlink is cashflow positive. I know Elon haters blindly hate anything, but SpaceX has saved the US billions and will continue to save billions, while making a profit.

  • @Kodakcompactdisc
    @Kodakcompactdisc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    You’re asking for it here. Respect 👊🏻
    This guy sounds like thunderfoot and common sense sceptic in that he’s on the ⚽️

    • @teslainvestah5003
      @teslainvestah5003 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the Wall Street Millenial is educated. He also cites sources while he talks. This makes him absolutely unlike either of them.

    • @Kodakcompactdisc
      @Kodakcompactdisc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@teslainvestah5003 also unlike Elon them.

  • @toddshreve
    @toddshreve 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    The use of the word grift is here is weird. The guy openly states, per the content in the video, that he will not return value to the investors. Grift: Money made dishonestly, as in a swindle. It sure feels like your just like everyone else, literally profiting from the Elon hate. That is, grift. Sad.

    • @rayhere7925
      @rayhere7925 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The circular grift economy is in full swing.

    • @socalsp3
      @socalsp3 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don't hurt my elon...

    • @toddshreve
      @toddshreve 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@socalsp3 wut?

    • @robertkral9967
      @robertkral9967 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Trump wrote this, in its Dementia it forgot to put cap lock on

    • @TheJustinJ
      @TheJustinJ 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Truth. ❤

  • @nimrodsmusic
    @nimrodsmusic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    How much did space x spend to buy what was left of the integrity of this channel?

    • @RandomPerson-V
      @RandomPerson-V 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What do you mean?

  • @JohnDoe-uk2iu
    @JohnDoe-uk2iu 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Lol I took a slap. I came reading the biggest "gift to the world" it turned sour fast xD

  • @plokijplokij97
    @plokijplokij97 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    All relevant points, but under what other circumstances would humanity get to Mars. It seems we either do it the crazy way, or don't do it at all, ever.

    • @AvocadoAfficionado
      @AvocadoAfficionado 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Why set Mars as a specific destination or goal? There's nothing there.

    • @obsidianjane4413
      @obsidianjane4413 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@AvocadoAfficionado Lemme cutnpaste this for you:
      Developing the technology and infrastructure that enables human travel to Mars, opens the entire solar system and its resources to whomever controls it.

    • @bananerz3167
      @bananerz3167 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      A crazy way is the only way? Would you be interested in some magic beans that create a plantloop to Mars?

    • @plokijplokij97
      @plokijplokij97 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bananerz3167 why did we go to moon? For profit? The US and Soviet government redirected the funds of society just for the sake of technological advancement and national superiority. At least now it is a private company doing it.

    • @kolbyking2315
      @kolbyking2315 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yeah. Relying on economic forces doesn't work well for things with negative value (CO2, nuclear waste) or where investments don't produce returns in a human lifetime (interplanetary space exploration).

  • @eternaldarkness3139
    @eternaldarkness3139 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    People cannot live on Mars, we can only die there. Only question is; How quickly
    Musk: How do I make a spaceship company profitable? I trick people into thinking a massive Mars base is a great idea. A great idea that requires 10,000 Starships.

    • @skierpage
      @skierpage 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is not at all what is happening, did you even watch this video? Elon Musk says SpaceX will take its profits and put them into establishing a human presence on Mars, at vast expense. The Mars base is what will make SpaceX unprofitable for decades; conversely If SpaceX had no plans for Mars it could be profitable already, since Falcon 9 and Starlink are excellent products that make money.

    • @eternaldarkness3139
      @eternaldarkness3139 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@skierpage Starlink: it takes Musk 40,000 satellites to do the job that 2 already established companies do with only 6. The cost of these satellites, launches, short lifespans, and limited market will make profitability a challange. No one in a city will want this service, no one in poorer countries can afford it, and it's more expensive than what already exists. Take a moment to think why Musk wants to have, an infinite number of launches for the minor benefit of a slightly lower, High Ping.
      Mars: There will never be a permanent presence on Mars (at least not of any significance) it gets down to -120C at night, the water and soil are poisonous, extreme radiation, virtually no atmosphere, low gravity, it's uncertain if people or animals can even reproduce. A "million people, need 2 million pounds of food every day". The list goes on. More infinite launch cycles.
      Saturn V launches took 1 rocket each trip to the Moon. Musk: 16. There's a pattern emerging.
      You want some useful videos, maybe check out: Common Sense Skeptic & Thunderf00t.
      A man who lays of 14,000 people, then 2 days later requests a payoff equal to 30 years of their salaries is not concerned with people, and it gets a whole lot worse...
      Trump said he wanted to protect Democracy, Sam Bankman-Fried said he wanted to save the world, Elizabeth Holmes wanted to cure the World, NFT's were going to change the world. Grifters, all of them. Now Musk is being investigated by: DOJ, SEC, & NHSTA

  • @ZingsVideos
    @ZingsVideos 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Couldn't you say the same thing about any low dividend stock? Apple for example. How many more decades until they pay investors more than one percent?

    • @toddknode752
      @toddknode752 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Those companies earnings were reinvested into the company. The difference is Musk has stated he is going to invest all of Space X's income into a non-revenue producing venture, colonizing Mars.

  • @billthecat7536
    @billthecat7536 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Are you by chance related to Gordon Johnson? 🤣

    • @simeon8360
      @simeon8360 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Read the comments.
      You are not in the Twitter Elon cult echo chamber. People here are informed and well aware that Elon is a grifter.

    • @qwerty112311
      @qwerty112311 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@simeon8360LMFAO the Elon haters deny reality.
      Tesla: not a grift, a profitable company that for a decade led the EV market worldwide and continues to do so everywhere but China
      SpaceX: not a grift, a wildly successful launch business that is cash flow positive and similarly successful internet business that is also cash flow positive

  • @MichaelWilliamz
    @MichaelWilliamz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    We need to start an inverse Wall Street Millennial ETF or something…

  • @gabrielfrancis7616
    @gabrielfrancis7616 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I vote that musk be on the very first starship to Mars. Show us the way TechnoKing!

  • @digiblak997
    @digiblak997 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    By the end of the year space x will start taking penalties for the artemis money it received. They are almost 2 years behind schedule

  • @Todaviho
    @Todaviho 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Pretty weak arguments and analysis I have to say. Who wants to live on an oilplatform in the middle of the atlantic? Nobody, but people do that for long periods... why? Oil. Its quite possible that the mineral resources on Mars will be the reason that people with go there at the start. So "living" there will be more based on corporations than normal cities. At least initially.

    • @Rio.Motel.84
      @Rio.Motel.84 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The fact that mars has 1/3 of earths gravity, no local life sustaining resources, and no atmosphere and magnetic field to protect the most of basic living organisms, makes this colonising fantasy...a fantasy. While everyone "waits" deliverance, Musk is enjoying his billionaire lifestyle on Earth at the expense of future promises. He is a smart man.

    • @12pentaborane
      @12pentaborane 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What mineral resources could be found on Mars that aren't already in abundance on Earth or asteroids? As much as I'd like to see a Mars colony set up it would be the greatest resource sink in history.

    • @Todaviho
      @Todaviho 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@12pentaborane If your mining asteroids it might be easier to mine Mars instead. Or use it as a refining station instead of poluting earth. I'm not saying it's easy or even viable. But to flat out claim that there aren't potential areas where a "fixed" settlement on Mars might be possible (like in this video), I find disingenuous.

  • @mikegoodness9767
    @mikegoodness9767 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    I've noticed Musk frequently talks about sending humans to Mars. Noticeably absent are quotes of Musk volunteering himself for a Mars mission. How magnanimous!

    • @harm991
      @harm991 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      He said he wants to go, and even would be first, but rationally better to keep running the company 24/7.

    • @danfeeney956
      @danfeeney956 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Isn’t Elon quoted in this video as saying he wishes to die on Mars?

    • @alquinn8576
      @alquinn8576 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      if you've read his biography, you would know Musk hasn't gone into space in part because of the bad optics of his launches being used as a billionaire's plaything

  • @robertplatt1693
    @robertplatt1693 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If Apple can lose founder control, any company can.

  • @rhobot75
    @rhobot75 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I almost gave a Like just based on title but I will be patient and wait for the end.

  • @bearmarkettradeideas
    @bearmarkettradeideas 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    What is priced appropriately after the Federal Reserves’ massive quantitative easing programs coupled with ZIRP liquidity injections?

    • @nyquil762
      @nyquil762 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nailed it

  • @Iconoclasher
    @Iconoclasher 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Musk: "occupy Mars" PLEASE!! 😂

  • @douglasfeldman7800
    @douglasfeldman7800 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hyperloop None would be a great topic for a separate video

  • @TheLookingOne
    @TheLookingOne 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Elon is the Diaper Donnie of tech

  • @craig3.0
    @craig3.0 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Look, I'm just an engineering student and ksp player, but... I have serious doubts about SpaceX's ability to even launch a rocket with a payload to mars, let alone do any of the things Musk has been talking about. Getting something into orbit is far, far easier than getting something to another planet. The amount of delta-v needed is much, much higher, and then you still need to figure out a way to slow down and land the thing without breaking anything. Seeing them struggling to get Starship to complete even a suborbital flight without blowing up makes me think they just don't have that ability.

    • @RandomPerson-V
      @RandomPerson-V 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      At this point they don't. Which is why they're testing and improving the design with iterative development. Also they don't always need fuel to slow down their spacecraft when going to mars. If they can create a spacecraft that is ridiculously robust, they can just enter it into the mars atmosphere and slow it down enough to do propulsive landing.

    • @Kaodusanya
      @Kaodusanya 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You’re an engineering student and are shocked they didnt get starship to orbit on the first try?

    • @jimpaddy79
      @jimpaddy79 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Kaodusanya well pretty much every other major rocket project worked on the first try, how may Saturn rockets exploded ?. I would say it is shocking to constantly fail at something that was achieved over 60 years ago with slid rules.

    • @jimpaddy79
      @jimpaddy79 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thealienrobotanthropologist lol, describing the greatest engineering challenge in the history of humanity as not a big deal 😂

  • @stizanley3987
    @stizanley3987 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    No one from that company will ever go to Mars, but those reusable rockets are great technology.

    • @greggorywilson2765
      @greggorywilson2765 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      This. Musk is a real mixed bag. Without SpaceX and Musk there would be no viable reusable rockets for LEO for who knows how long into the future, actually saving a lot of $ for satellite launches. That said, his Mars obsession is ludicrous, and I'm more into Toyota's vision with hybrids than pure EV's since my vision has me driving into the middle of nowhere to go camping.

    • @LarsLarsen77
      @LarsLarsen77 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@greggorywilson2765 It's NOT SAVING ANY MONEY though. Previous (disposable) rockets cost less when adjusted for inflation.

    • @carlgarrett5142
      @carlgarrett5142 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Falcon 1 rockets that are the current bread and butter of the company are awesome. But putting so much money and time into Starship and the Mars colony idea is basically as if Musk came into Tesla one day and decided they were going to make nothing but the Cybertruck.

    • @DominikPlaylists
      @DominikPlaylists 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@LarsLarsen77 then how is it possible the satellite launch costs are dropping so much even without accounting for inflation?

    • @jimpaddy79
      @jimpaddy79 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      are they? they dont off much or any of a cost saving

  • @BlackSkullArmor
    @BlackSkullArmor 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Clearly all musk needs to do is set himself up as the Omnissiah and make sure the ship over to Mars is packed full of tech fanatics

  • @lartorgames
    @lartorgames 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wall Street Millennial is pretty accurate on Tesla however when comes to SpaceX he is pretty off, SpaceX does not need to maximize profit on launches as the market is only five billion, the launch market is very immature and lack lusting and the only way is reduce cost, by allow human exploration like mars mission musk expands the market. The current market with upcoming competition if SpaceX continues falcon 9 without starship then SpaceX will most likely be obsolete, this what happened with ULA and that why compliance is deadly killer in rocket industry as every body going for the pie. The whole NASA Artemis program long term is align with MARS colonization so don’t think musk is the only one (the us govt also think mars colonization is the future).

  • @andreib2489
    @andreib2489 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Still better than paying the shareholders. Hopefully SpaceX will never go public. Then it will just be making money instead of progress.

  • @endersgameover
    @endersgameover 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Is it really a grift if he is giving open interviews talking about using the profits to do this?
    I’m not a fan of his, but this doesn’t strike me as a grift in line with those usually discuss

    • @FiftyShekels
      @FiftyShekels 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He's made borderline fraudulent claims to land government contracts and attract investors, he's nearly 4 years behind on his $2bn contract for a moon landing from the US government, it's quite the grift if you ask me

    • @harm991
      @harm991 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Maybe they're sad because it's giving humanity false hope.

    • @MatthewMS.
      @MatthewMS. 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Everything about musk is grifty

    • @harm991
      @harm991 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MatthewMS.grift, verb, INFORMAL
      engage in petty or small-scale swindling.
      It's not a grift, just a guy trying new things and everyone criticizing.

  • @mikldude9376
    @mikldude9376 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One has to be a bit sceptical , is it true that so far they have not managed to get a Star liner past low earth orbit without blowing up ?
    The whole thing is starting to look like Vapourware.

  • @nmecht
    @nmecht 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Your main flawed assumption is that the new space market (cargo to stations, satellite launches) will remain stagnant. It will not. There are about 8 new space stations in construction right now, and will be completed in the next 10 years. More satellite constellations are built every year. When you talk about the commercial viability of a company, it is helpful to understand the market it is servicing.

  • @1voluntaryist
    @1voluntaryist 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Any day our species could end. Extinction events have happened 4 times. Scare tactic you claim? Not realistic? When it becomes "real" it's too late to say: "Oh, we didn't know it would happen this soon!" We save ourselves or become extinct, there is no "savior" to hear excuses and grant a reprieve.
    Whatever the financial cost, the existential benefit is....? What price do you put on yourself? On humanity? Think about it. It's not a matter of "if", it's a matter of "when".

    • @eternaldarkness3139
      @eternaldarkness3139 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Mars ain't the answer.

    • @electrified0
      @electrified0 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A tiny section of humanity continuing to survive in bubbles in space where they'll never be able to exit their confined interior sounds like avoiding extinction by little more than technicality.

    • @LarsLarsen77
      @LarsLarsen77 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No it fucking can't end any day. Hell, we couldn't even end it intentionally.

    • @needlebacklessons4950
      @needlebacklessons4950 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is no extinction-level threat that would be easier to deal with by developing a self-sustaining colony on Mars than by tackling the threat on Earth. The worst thing you could possibly imagine happening to the Earth would still sustain far more than the 1 million people Musk wants to put on Mars.

  • @jedidiahmck
    @jedidiahmck 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Man. I really enjoy this channel. I wish they weren’t such nut pullers when it comes to Elon. I’m not wearing any Tesla shirts but the dude has accomplished a lot. I also think it’s wild that he seriously has two of the best performing companies in their sectors. Meanwhile it takes like 3 of yall to put out a 14 minute video.

    • @notnoaintno5134
      @notnoaintno5134 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      A lot of what he does is basically scammy. Cybertruck is garbage, tesla robot sucks, too many things to name

    • @YoosufMuneer
      @YoosufMuneer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@notnoaintno5134 So Cybertruck is a scam just because you dislike it? Haha

    • @cycleistic1365
      @cycleistic1365 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@notnoaintno5134 To go on with the list: semi is a disaster, a truck that drivers hate because of its video game style approach while lacking much of the controls that the drivers actually need, Starships are tin cans exploding investors and tax payers money in the sky and will never deliver anything anywhere, people, cargo or fuel while their reuse is a hoax too, it brings no savings, more like contrary to that. Roadster 2 will never materialize even close range wise to the specs Musk has once marketed. Where are the million robo-taxis generating revenue for the Model 3 owners while they sleep? Tesla FSD is not reality, it's just an advanced cruise control at best. Hyperloop, hello? Busted. Neuralink functionality is not peer reviewed so whatever goes on there is mere marketing for the time being. Solar panel roads? Impossible to apply so that they would actually yield any significant amounts of energy compared to the production costs aka not happening.
      List of Musk's lies, false promises and vaporware just goes on and on, it's all just marketing to pump the stock price for himself and his venture capitalist buddies who can always dump their load on gullible retail buyers for profit since _there's a sucker born every minute._

    • @cycleistic1365
      @cycleistic1365 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@YoosufMuneer It's a cult item, all the reviews of it's fundamental flaws tell that it's shear garbage, possibly one among the worst cars ever produced. Yet despite all the cyber trk's flaws that owners have found in their precious vehicle, ones that have even made the car need to go for weeks repairs from the day one, some owner's are still stoked about how the car _makes them feel,_ which tells all about the cult mentality surrounding the mighty con-artist Musk and his crappy produce. Do your research and wake up from the cultist dream - although, _it's always easier to con a man than to convince them they've been conned._

    • @RememberingGames
      @RememberingGames 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Elon did nothing. He hired people then makes stupid decision because of his infinite money glitch. That's it. Elon himself never designed anything, much less did any engineering. His job is to sell you that he did. That, got to give him the credit, he is the most talented bulls@itter we've ever seen. Truly amazing.

  • @tigo01
    @tigo01 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What is the point of capital if not to use it to advance human civilization?

    • @tigo01
      @tigo01 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That’s the problem with these financial guys like WSM, all they can see is the hamster wheel they are running on. The only point of money is to make more money.

    • @eternaldarkness3139
      @eternaldarkness3139 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You think the guy who simultaneously lays off 14,000 worker whilst requesting a payout equal to 30 years of their cumulative salaries gives a f*ck about people?
      Look back at the first time fElon told people self driving would be fully functional by the "end of the year". That's the start of the rabbit hole, watch your step, it's deep.

    • @RandomPerson-V
      @RandomPerson-V 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@eternaldarkness3139You're talking about Elon and Tesla while we're talking about SpaceX here. It doesn't matter if he really cares about space exploration or not. From what it looks to be he at least funds it for the benefit of himself and due to his ego.

    • @alquinn8576
      @alquinn8576 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@eternaldarkness3139 he cares about humanity, not people

  • @sallehandrews6976
    @sallehandrews6976 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The money spent on mission to mars and moon shud hv bn spent to increase food productivity and medical

  • @sj1547
    @sj1547 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    So glad people are finally catching on to Elon the Grifter! In the words of John McClane "Welcome to the party pal!!"

  • @chriswright9096
    @chriswright9096 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    The true value of a stock is the present value of all future dividends. A simple truth that many fairly intelligent people seem completely unable to comprehend. A stock with no prospect of future dividends becomes a token that can be traded but has no inherent value (a bit like a crypto currency). One day in the future, that stock will eventually go to zero and every dollar that a person has made trading it will have been lost by a different individual.

    • @omdx4643
      @omdx4643 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are you stupid? Even a stock for a company, that is going out of business, can have a value, because the stock gives you a right to get a part of the money from liquidation.
      A stock gived you the ownership of a company mesning you have ownership of their current assets.

    • @LarsLarsen77
      @LarsLarsen77 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      LOL, you don't need dividends to have a stock's price go up. The price can just go up.

    • @DominikPlaylists
      @DominikPlaylists 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not true as companies are often times bought, merged or perform stock buybacks.

    • @toddknode752
      @toddknode752 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@LarsLarsen77 his post wasn't about the stock price going up. It is about holders of the stock will not receive any cash returns from the company from holding the stock. If you own 10% of a business and over 20 years you do not recieve any income from the business, what value is your 10%? It is only worth something if you can sell it to someone else.

  • @Alan.livingston
    @Alan.livingston 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Every business he runs needs some unobtainable dream to sell as a part of the narrative.

  • @TheDavidlloydjones
    @TheDavidlloydjones หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Until he solves the radiation problem, everything Musk says about travel to Mars is nuts.
    Transporting the people isn't enough: you also need to transport the dozens of tons of lead or, perhaps preferably, water to keep them from being fried by the radiation outside Earth's protective magnetosphere.

    • @TheJustinJ
      @TheJustinJ 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Faraday cage.

  • @pavelkoudelka8934
    @pavelkoudelka8934 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    What Space X is doing is one of the coolest things in the last decade... We haven't put a man on the moon for over 50 years, it's time to gradually move on and change that... I don't see the value of colonizing space on a commercial level, but primarily on scientific and technological...

    • @downix
      @downix 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      SpaceX is not well situated for that, however, due to their LEO centric technology.

    • @palisadenhonko4962
      @palisadenhonko4962 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And who pays for space colonizing?

    • @singular9
      @singular9 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very little evidence we went to the moon. NASA's latest mission to the moon had zero footage because they "had trouble with communication because it's hard to move data through space". That's a direct quote. So we had the tech in the 60's and 70's? Sure. Do it again please. Indias whole moon landing and all photos were such obvious photoshops and low budget renders that it was a laughing stock.

    • @tripplefives1402
      @tripplefives1402 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@downix Isn't NASA missions mostly to the space station? Is NASA LEO centric then? Logic?

    • @downix
      @downix 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @tripplefives1402 NASA is not a launch provider.

  • @alexbrown604
    @alexbrown604 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    If only these comments could be saved forever. Oh wait it’s the internet, The internet never forgets. Awfully kind and quite polite to only call it a grift.

    • @blubb7711
      @blubb7711 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      All Elon Musk companies are giant scams.

  • @TheDaftySage
    @TheDaftySage 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    WSM has become critical of Elon? I remember how this channel used to think Elon was a genius.

    • @harm991
      @harm991 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Tesla stock price went from 400 to 150 so they're pissed?

  • @Handl3sAreStupid
    @Handl3sAreStupid 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Is this an AI channel? This guy's voice sounds generated.

    • @ItsJoKeZ
      @ItsJoKeZ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      you know it isn't and it never has been. good try.

    • @eternaldarkness3139
      @eternaldarkness3139 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nope, there's just some channels that sound that way. Dartigan (Game Sins) is the same way.
      AI voice is getting really good though.

  • @jonogrimmer6013
    @jonogrimmer6013 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    We strive to do these things not because they're easy but because they are hard. It's what made us evolve from cavemen to who we have today. Without curiosity, that want/need to do what seems impossible we'd likely still be cavemen or extinct. Musk may well fail in this lofty goal but someone else will succeed... if we can survive long enough without destroying ourselves.

    • @henlo1910
      @henlo1910 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Loooool

    • @electrified0
      @electrified0 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I can think of a few billion other reasons to do those things that may be the true motivation

    • @LarsLarsen77
      @LarsLarsen77 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What we have today is a complete inability to put a man on the moon.

  • @obsidianjane4413
    @obsidianjane4413 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Wallstreet values SpaceX at $180B because you can't calculate ROE on ∞. Developing the technology and infrastructure that enables human travel to Mars, opens the entire solar system and its resources to whomever controls it.
    The analogy here is the European Colonial Era (without any native people). The first investors in the exploration(exploitation), be they royal or corporate charters, created incredible returns and shaped the world we know today.
    I'm not a fan of Musk, nor a space cadet, but the skeptical sentiment here reminds of when SpaceX started. But they have already revolutionized orbital launch.

    • @chrisdonish
      @chrisdonish 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Colonialism in itself was not profitable, it was the industrial revolution that stemmed from it that made the European colonial powers really wealthy .

    • @obsidianjane4413
      @obsidianjane4413 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@chrisdonish lol.

    • @notnoaintno5134
      @notnoaintno5134 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@chrisdonish colonialism was hella profitable. The industrial revolution didnt happen in colonies, it happened in europe / america. Further, most of the former colonies are and were way worse without the europeans ruling them

    • @chrisdonish
      @chrisdonish 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @notnoaintno5134 I never said the industrial revolution happened outside of Europe.

    • @chrisdonish
      @chrisdonish 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @notnoaintno5134 if colonialism was so profitable, why did was the british empire bankrupted by ww2 and how did none colonial nations outproduce them in industrial output?

  • @shivaslilgsunlimited7507
    @shivaslilgsunlimited7507 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Elon’s Fyre Festival on Mars! Who wants tickets? One way

  • @sertorius3319
    @sertorius3319 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There’s certainly money to be made on Mars in the long term, but we’d have to talk about a timeframe longer than any businessman can or should be expected to deal with. Also, it would be more cost effective to use unmanned drones to do everything that needs to be done on the surface, with any humans in the area in an orbiting space habitat. This would also require a large reduction in the cost of shipping to and from Earth’s orbit as well to be feasible (once you’re out of there, things are much easier because lower gravity on the Moon and Mars allow for a better fuel-to-weight ratio). Ultimately, the issue is less about the technology as the investment needed to set up the infrastructure to make it economically viable.

  • @harm991
    @harm991 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Oof. The title of this video. Know that SpaceX brought us rockets that land.
    I'm really curious if this video holds up. Landing rockets is the thing they will remember 100 years from now. Not what you are doing.

    • @ZontarDow
      @ZontarDow 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Any video knocking SpaceX holds up

    • @eternaldarkness3139
      @eternaldarkness3139 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Really, 100 years we'll remember self landing rockets...
      NASA developed this almost 50 years ago, and we had Space Shuttles for 3 decades. Guess you forgot.
      Bet you think Musk invented the "Hyperloop" too. (Patented 1904)
      Perhaps he invented Tesla... nope, he invested several years later.
      The list goes on. He's just very good at branding, and developing a cult-like fanbase.
      He's also currently being investigated by DOJ, SEC & NHTSA

    • @harm991
      @harm991 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ZontarDow Jealousy seems strong with you. You do not have the ability to further the boundaries of humanity.
      And clearly you're upset another group of people can.

    • @ZontarDow
      @ZontarDow 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@harm991 you are a bag holder

    • @harm991
      @harm991 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ZontarDow Nah, I sold most of it last year and bought oil companies. I do not believe society will make it nor do I believe Musk will reach Mars. But I respect the hopium.

  • @ktktktktktktkt
    @ktktktktktktkt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    7:53 Is this supposed to justify his pay package? That's completely illogical and does not provide any support for why Tesla should pay him more. This is kinda crazy, but it's true.

    • @Kai-kl6fe
      @Kai-kl6fe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      He recieved no pay for the past 6 years, meanwhile Tesla stock price is up 1100% since then plus he has accomplished all of the milestones set for that pay package. You being sore about it does not invalidate that. And what he does with that stock is none of anyones business in the first place but he vows to put it towards space exploration and people are still butthurt. smh

    • @ItsJoKeZ
      @ItsJoKeZ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Kai-kl6fe spotted an elon-shill

    • @Kai-kl6fe
      @Kai-kl6fe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ItsJoKeZ yepp, pay no attention to the validity of what was said or bring any counterarguments, just throw out a label. That will show me!

    • @island97
      @island97 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@ItsJoKeZwhat did he say that was wrong ??? The targets he had to hit was seen as impossible to achieve at the time. So he achieve those goals and he shouldn't be paid ??

    • @eternaldarkness3139
      @eternaldarkness3139 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tesla lifetime profit: $25 billion
      14,000 Layoffs in April assuming an average $100,000 salary: $1.4 billion
      Musk's bonus: $50 billion. Let's be clear on this: 50,000 million dollars (double the lifetime profits)
      Musk: cannot sell these for 5 years, but it would allow him to sell his current stock of similar value at any time.
      Musk: I'm the first investor, I'll be the last to sell my stock... sold $40 billion in stocks so far.
      Why does he need the stock: it is believed; he wants the voting power to splinter off many of the products developed such as AI, & Robotics. Effectively stealing them from the shareholders

  • @adamspencer5142
    @adamspencer5142 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can barely land a large robot or Mars, takes like four ways of slowing down as the atmosphere is too thin. (but thick enough that heat is still a problem.) Landing people and all their life support on this thing, IDK if it is practically possible.

  • @DisneyWorldAdventures
    @DisneyWorldAdventures 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Apparently the most brilliant person yet Elon sure does say um a lot!! He clearly as a hard time coming up with what he wants to say, you can pick the reason why.

  • @hellofranky99
    @hellofranky99 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Hold on, 3% of $1T is $30B. I think you misspoke when you said Starlink has a cap of $3B in annual revenue.

    • @YoosufMuneer
      @YoosufMuneer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Starlink is already doing $6B+ in revenue LOL. This video is so wrong haha

    • @brammeijboom-mj9ld
      @brammeijboom-mj9ld 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@YoosufMuneer nah, 2023 was 4.1 bill, that 6.6 is a projection for this year. The real question is if the market for such a product is big enough outside the USA, that $1800 price tag is pretty steep for people with a GDP of $2000, like India and Indonesia

    • @flazerflint
      @flazerflint 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@brammeijboom-mj9ld its 120$ even in the us lol and the company said it has lowered the price on poorer countries

  • @RobertImhoff
    @RobertImhoff 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Is this just a hit piece because Musk is associated with SpaceX? Or is WSM running out of actual grifts to report on? Or both? Today's headline from Bloomberg News: "Elon Musk’s SpaceX has initiated discussions about selling existing shares at a price that could value the closely held company at roughly $200 billion". This video has aged like fine milk.

    • @MuhammadImHardBruceLee
      @MuhammadImHardBruceLee 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @RobertImhoff You don't realise it, but this is even more evidence of excellent grifting.

    • @RobertImhoff
      @RobertImhoff 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@MuhammadImHardBruceLee This is NOT Red Lobster

  • @WallyTony
    @WallyTony 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    John works now for the Grove Oklahoma PD as the high school resource officer.

  • @RichardSavage76
    @RichardSavage76 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Do your parents know youre online again?

  • @chrisvinci5417
    @chrisvinci5417 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    How the hell is it a grift? Its a private company and musk has been transparent from the beginning what the goals are.

  • @jamesspent7101
    @jamesspent7101 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Mars is a marketing gimmick that most people believe to be real. It reminds me of 'mexico will build the wall'...

  • @justinbarion2269
    @justinbarion2269 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "...but sending that many people to Mars won't be cheap."
    Or even possible...

  • @bb1111116
    @bb1111116 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A well done video about the problems with Elon Musk’s Mars colony ambitions.

  • @Breakfast598
    @Breakfast598 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Idk, SpaceX has some seriously valuable tech and huge government contracts. Mars plans aside, they have a decent shot of being one of a few profitable private space companies servicing Earth space.

    • @LarsLarsen77
      @LarsLarsen77 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A decent shot at being what they already are? Cool story bro. I'll get into a time machine and invest right away.

  • @samuelbucher5189
    @samuelbucher5189 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    SpaceX has already done so much for American space flight industry. If they continue doing what they are already doing and push for their short term goals, like Starship and continuing to expand Starlink, then I don't really care if they have some crazy far-off plans for Mars. Although it would be nice. Mars colonization needs to happen, objectively, but I don't think I'll be nearly as soon or as fast as Musk hopes (which is how it usually goes, frankly).

    • @LarsLarsen77
      @LarsLarsen77 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They've done literally nothing. We were putting satellites in space for LESS MONEY in inflation adjusted dollar terms in the fucking 1980s.

    • @GETAMPEDRr
      @GETAMPEDRr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@LarsLarsen77 The development of commercial launch systems has substantially reduced the cost of space launch. NASA’s space shuttle had a cost of about $1.5 billion to launch 27,500 kg to Low Earth Orbit (LEO), $54,500/kg. SpaceX’s Falcon 9 now advertises a cost of $62 million to launch 22,800 kg to LEO, $2,720/kg. Commercial launch has reduced the cost to LEO by a factor of 20. This will have a substantial impact on the space industry, military space, and NASA.

    • @GETAMPEDRr
      @GETAMPEDRr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      from NASA