The truth table is not demonstrating a causal relation. It is only a truth-functional relation. It helps to remember that in a natural language too, not all implications are causal. For example, the statement, "if you are good, then I'll give you some chocolate", has nothing to do with causation. (You might be good and I decide not to give you any chocolate anyway. Your being good doesn't cause me to give you chocolate; instead it's my decision to give you chocolate or not.) So material implication need not demonstrate anything at all about causal relations.
1 question : if i have good grades it is sufficient condition to be accepted in university?i think no bcs maybe i have kill someone or steal or i die etc..am i wrong? thx in advandance
Perhaps examples that were absolutely necessary, etc., would have been more convincing. Some students from real life keep bringing up real life examples of people sneaking into movie theaters without tickets. The examples you give are clear, but weak.
As Jarule sang in the 90s: 'What would I do without you?'. Thank you this was so helpful.
2:40, why is the little guy slipping if the sidewalks are dry?
Thank you very very much!!! I have been struggling with this and you cleared everything up!
Same
finally i can understand implication, implication means sufficient
Jen could have climbed the wall to get in or have been given access by a friend so she might not necessarily have a ticket.
Totally what I was thinking!
Thank you so much. Great explanation.
Jen could also work at the fair outside of our imperfect knowledge, right?
Good video. Now I understand it thoroughly.
the third row in te truth table at 1:51 is going over my head. if p and q are different, how can one imply the other?
The truth table is not demonstrating a causal relation. It is only a truth-functional relation.
It helps to remember that in a natural language too, not all implications are causal. For example, the statement, "if you are good, then I'll give you some chocolate", has nothing to do with causation. (You might be good and I decide not to give you any chocolate anyway. Your being good doesn't cause me to give you chocolate; instead it's my decision to give you chocolate or not.)
So material implication need not demonstrate anything at all about causal relations.
Amazing video!
Excellent, thank you.
1 question : if i have good grades it is sufficient condition to be accepted in university?i think no bcs maybe i have kill someone or steal or i die etc..am i wrong? thx in advandance
Did you find the answer to your question?
I don't know what I just watched.
i can’t focus because you pronounce your Rs like Ws
The little wascal has spiwit.
Perhaps examples that were absolutely necessary, etc., would have been more convincing. Some students from real life keep bringing up real life examples of people sneaking into movie theaters without tickets. The examples you give are clear, but weak.
haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa