Deflection of Beams Problem | Macaulay's Method | simply supported beam | GATE

Dr. Michael Thomas Rex, National Engineering College, Kovilpatti, Tamil Nadu, INDIA
This video lecture explains
1. What is Macaulay's Method?
2. How to determine the deflection of Simply supported beam

[@massivelystressed2099]

Easy explanation for such a complicated concept.. you saved me.
Thank you so much sir 🙏

[@michaelthomasrex]

You are most welcome. Kindly subscribe the channel.

[@lukhonabawuti7147]

Perfectly explained Sir thanks for the content!

[@michaelthomasrex]

Thanks for the comment. Kindly subscribe the channel.

[@-ShahjebChoudhury]

Nice video 👍 it is understandable

[@michaelthomasrex]

Thanks for your comments. Kindly subscribe to the channel.

[@santhoshramv9036]

Nice explanation sir and understandable sir

[@michaelthomasrex]

Keep watching

[@indianmusicvibrations3758]

Thanks you very much Sir!.... 🥰

[@michaelthomasrex]

Most welcome. Kindly subscribe the channel.

[@user-qn8ts9jj1b]

Perfect sir😊❤

[@michaelthomasrex]

Keep watching. Kindly subscribe to the channel.

[@galibshaikh3632]

Subscribing because of your this wonderful explanation!!! Thanks sir🫂

[@michaelthomasrex]

Thanks and welcome

[@vedsoni3600]

I had one question: When integrating (x-3), why do we consider that as a single term? If we integrate them individually [(x^2/2)-(3*x)], this will change the value of C1 later on giving us different answers.

[@michaelthomasrex]

We should consider (x-3) as a single term. Because, it represents the distance of load 40KN from the reference as a single term. The whole term 40(x-3) is the moment of 40 KN load fro the reference.

[@okunlolafaozee4142]

@@michaelthomasrex I have been searching for answer to this question for a very long time. I'm so glad I came across your video and this reply. Thank you so much!

[@gajjivijay8207]

Sir there is 45kN but u tack 40 kN

[@michaelthomasrex]

In the problem, the point load is wrongly mentioned as 45 KN, but it is actually 40 KN. In the illustration, it is clearly given as 40 KN. Thanks for the comments. kindly subscribe the channel.

[@sadhvikbutti.sadhvik2987]

Sir Ra+Rb=48+45=93
But u consider 48+40=88

[@michaelthomasrex]

"There's a typo in the question; please consider replacing '45' with '40'."

[@syedjawaharhussain3208]

Ra+Rb=93 not 88 that means 48+45=93

[@michaelthomasrex]

In the problem, the point load is wrongly mentioned as 45 KN, but it is actually 40 KN. In the illustration, it is clearly given as 40 KN. Now, Ra+Rb=88 KN. Thanks for the comments. kindly subscribe the channel.

[@rohitsomware]

48+40 ahe re...