Deliberately spiteful. And then to attempt through lawyers to bully the Press and BBC to remove the factual story . It sums them up ,in my eyes ,spiteful bullies
It’s more than naff that they used the late Queen’s nickname, it’s controlling and manipulative. It certainly wasn’t out of any fondness for her, it was designed to stick the knife in. That much is obvious.
I thiught she stold the name from one of Andrews daughters? One was going to use the name but Harry's borrowed child came first so Nutmeg snatched it first.
Sadly disgusting, seriously hurtful and utterly beyond the pale. And we hear almost daily of more and more and more despicable tricks they have pulled, and the Late Queen was totally polite in saying "Harry is too much In Love"..... the todger rules, and takes orders without even querying the logic or legitimacy!!
@@highcountrydelatite Oh for sure! There’s always more pressing issues than the one we’re currently focusing on, what ever it is. However, each issue deserves attention.
I thought I read that the late Queen had stated after Prince Philip died that the nickname went either him, never to be used again. That aside, Harry and Meghan were cruel in their deliberate appropriation of her name, after her repeated no’s to them.
ปีที่แล้ว +66
Yes. She didn’t want her nickname to be used again after Prince Philip died. Using the private name to name their child was disrespectful and I’m sure it was the vulgar MM’s idea.
The word "NO" to MM means "YES" - you can't tell me what to do. This is the same women that openly declared that the Queen didn't own the word "Royal". It's all about respect and we all know MM has none of that.
@@kelsogirl562yes, it's so funny how MM thought that after 5 minutes of being 'royal' and thought she was more 'royal' than the Queen and should be able to register the word as her 'brand name' when the Queen had clearly explained to her that Anything to do with Royalty could Not be Used to make money!!!!
Harry is a liar. the name Lilibet was already trademarked before her birth and Harry is on television saying that the conversation with the queen asking permission was AFTER Lili was born. disgusting to use the personal name that was to be retired after her husband's death.
@@steveturner6770 I think perhaps lemonysnikett is talking about the domain names. H&M or just M bought quite a few... I think several of them were to do with politics. Others were variations of Lilibet Diana Elizabeth. Funny, none of them contained beloved granny Doria's name
It's just a name, i name my dog lili,am i in trouble? If I'm great grandmother and one of my grandchild son use my name for his daughter, I'm very proud. The queen is racist because Megan is haft black.
They were never racists, Megan is throwing things across the pond like a child 'Billy nae mates' in a school playground. Purely for attention and this is one of those pointless empty moon bump balls she has paid the press for to keep them relevent. Just rehashing the rubbish bin she lives in with her lies....
I believe that Harry thought Meghan was going with Elizabeth but Meghan changed it after the “blessing” from the Queen. Meghan knew it would cause distress . She knew exactly what she was doing. H just went along with his wife’s wishes because what ever Meghan wants … Meghan gets !!
Suprise, suprise.. H&M did something they weren't approved to do, lied, caused insult and upset to the Queen personally.... how unusual!! (Sarcasm? Yes!!) MM wasn't allowed to monetise 'Royal' or 'Sussex Royal' etc... so it was just another stab in the back to the poor Queen 😢
Their two children should have been Christened Archibald and Elizabeth and then the option to shorten is theirs - the contempt of M & H for sensible traditions is breathtaking.
I thought it was awful at the time to take something that was so personal to the Queen as their own. I'm not surprised they didn't have her blessing, despite their claims. I don't imagine that the Queen had many things that were solely her own, without some sort of tradition or heritage or public claim on it, but this was one thing that was private, individual, sweet and just hers. And they spoiled it. These are not good people.
Perfect analysis 👏🏼 they really are the most vile disgusting pair. How the HELL they think for a moment they can repair the damage or their reputation is mind boggling! I would love to have a face to face with Megaliar & I’m not keen on confrontations but I would tell her just what I think ! 🤬🇬🇧
@@tlb2970 The late Queen was very wise. I am willing to bet that is one of the reasons why a Windsor christening was also refused. In the end the little girl was christened in the garden of the montecito house
Meghan just likes to rile everyone. Btw if she’s so proud of her children, why don’t we see them? I think I’ve a good idea why. They certainly don’t spend much time with them.
The whole Monarchy is evil IMHO. From letting corrupt politicians abuse citizens in the colonies through corruption scandals and COVID lockdowns, to participation in the WEF, and promotion of the climate change hoax. Even William is involved in that.
You seem to cope realky well with pedos,abusers and bullies.Prince Andrew,Jimmy Savile etc ...These are the people linked to the royal family that brits are proud of
@@Curious-z8h 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.Andrew dirty moves won't go away even if thet want to use this crap,this nonsense to distract people.Let's not forget that it was the queen who have him money to settle.She didn't want her son to steal the limelight during the platinum jubilee celebration
Government: We have no money for anything. So we are going to have to cut funding to your schools, hospitals, local council services, and those benefits you rely on to eat. We are making the tough decisions. Also Government: We have found money to give paintings of the King to all of those services. Because you need reminding of your place, peasants.
They told the Queen they were naming their daughter after her. She thought they meant Elizabeth so she thought it was sweet. They knew she wouldn't agree to Lilbeth so she was furious. Those 2 can never be trusted.
Anyone who has a pet name in their family knows exactly how insulting this is for someone to steal it or even use it. It was outrageous and disgusting.
This is Meghan....USING ANYTHING SHE CAN TO FOREVER ASSOCIATE HERSELF TO THE ROYAL FAMILY! I knew this at the instant i learned she had stolen both these names, the Queen's AND Diana's, SHE'S ONLY USED THE ROYAL FAMILY, IN EVERY INSTANCE, AS A STEPPING STONE TO HER DESPERATE NEED FOR FAME!
I don't agree, if they named it Elizabeth that would've been much different, but to name it after the one name that QE stated she didn't want used again, after her husband passed, then that takes on a whole other story...@@user-gr8ii8jr9o
No just that. Any photograph, no matter how private the setting, would be sold to the higgest bidder the next day, along with sound clips from a hidden microphone.
It's going to be very interesting to see if Megan and Harry raise a couple of "train wrecks" or a couple of actually good people because they rebel against who their parents are. I am in no way expecting anything from middle ground, lol!
If Queen Elizabeth was angry, I imagine it was fuelled by hurt, that was her childhood name full of memories of her dad and her sister. Harry claimed to ‘adore’ her but his actions proved the opposite by the end of her life 😕
It was a flat out exploitation of the relationship & hugely disrespectful to the privacy & dignity of Her Majesty. Harry's too dumb to see it & Skidmarkle doesn't give a rat's ass if it'll further her ulterior motives.
@@stopthelie7752 Because that name was very personal to the late Queen. And that must be why the late Queen point blank REFUSED to have a photo taken with Lilibet. It all makes sense now
@@stopthelie7752because it was her families nickname to her that only her parents, sister and her husband called her and she said when Prince Philip died it was not to be used again
It was nothing to do with paying tribute to the queen but self aggrandisement to them with the implied closest connection to the Queen the highest position in the Royal Hierarchy. This made worse by the fact Merckle openly mocked her. The only thing they deserve is the tower.
@@stopthelie7752 RUGBBISH. Harry was one of her 8 grandchildren. The late Queen was very close to Zara who was her first grandchild and also Sophies daughter. Harry likes to make out that he was the favourite which is not true it is just that he was the second son of Charles who was the heir and as Diana died the late Queen did look out for William and Harry. If he was so close to the late Queen he would have said so in his book yet he talks of being very lonely and being alone alot during the school holidays.
@user-ig7lv1rw6z zara is not the oldest grandchild, her brother Peter is. She is not the daughter of Edward's wife but Princess Anne, the Queens daughter.
I get it. This nickname is very dear to her , the name her parents used to call her , it is invasive . Meghan for her all her racism claim , she could have honored her mom doria , but no, all the name should go to the white family , doria wasnt enough to be included in the first biracial daughter of the royal family. I get the queen , i get her. oh wait ,the squad is going to claim racism on this one, that is Meghan's go to fight back.
And that must be why the late Queen point blank REFUSED to have a photo taken with Lilibet. It all makes sense now. I recall at the time being very surprised that they had not called their daughter Doria given that Doria is the only grandparent the children are exposed to and given that Doria is the first black grand parent. Interesting.....
It was presumptuous and rude of the Sussexes to name their daughter the family's private nickname for the Queen. I never believed the Queen blessed that decision for one second. As Mr. Cole says, if they want to HONOR the Queen, name their daughter Elizabeth. But it wasn't about honoring the Queen; it was about drawing attention to themselves.
@@englishrose11 the person who says they speak for everybody is wrong 100% of the time…. That’s you 😉 You keep worshipping that weird family who hate people like you, and I’ll just keep thinking it’s weird and a bit backwards to do so… What these people want for us is gross, and you’re fully supporting them like a muppet.
Privacy is just for them, they ride roughshod over their respective families ' privacy and get paid for it. Despicable in any family situation but especially so on the world stage. It's about time we all ignored this couple.
Narcissists will lovebomb, then attack and gaslight. The cycle will go round and round. I feel that they thought they could wipe the slate clean by taking the name Lillibet as an obnoxious way of lovebombing QEII, thinking she would be flattered, but it backfired spectacularly.
The queen is the narcissist. She is the emotionally damaged reason her family are all freaks and pederasts. She was so weird, cold, unfit to be a mother.
Only someone completely blindfolded would think it was an honour ,after the Queen had already requested that NO-ONE close ever use the name again. It was her reminder of the husband she had so recently lost .
Yup as usual they thought they were being innovative only for the late Queen to point blank REFUSE to have a photo taken with Lilibet. That refusal spoke VOLUMES....
It goes to show just how much those two Megaliers loved Queen Elizabeth!!! They didn't care in the least!!! And still!!! They continue lieing every breath they take!!! What a wonderful legacy they're making of theirselves to go down in history!!! 🇱🇷
Why not include Doria? If race was such an issue to Meghan and her roots why not honour her own mother? Because of money and attention. HRH PRINCESS CATHERINES WAS BORN CATHERINE ELIZABETH MIDDLETON il bet any money they didn’t want Elizabeth for that reason aswell.
I always thought it was not a compliment, but a 'stab' at the Queen and the RF, by Meghan herself, and dim Harry just went along with it, not realising why Meg chose it specifically (and yes, it is almost always the mother who has the final say on their child's name, in Western countries anyway).
I'm sure that was Harry's wife's idea, but when Harry called the Queen, he duped her (and duped is too nice for what they did). His own grandmother ... He's despicable. We know his wife is, too. When the name was released to the press, she must have been furious ... I was furious too and I'm in the US. I think most people felt the same. The despicable duo should feel shame, but they dont. We don't really know if "Little Betty" even exists. I refuse to call this invisible child "Lilibet".
I'm American too & I was appalled when they announced her name. I don't doubt for one millisecond that Harry lied when he called his grandmother for permission. He led her on, making her believe the kid's name would be Elizabeth. This was not an act of homage to the Queen but rather just another jab of the knife in her back. I refer to Hank & Skank's spawn as Merchie & Lilibucks (if they truly do exist). I really do hope they are fake because imagine having those two narcissistic lying weasels as your parents. Those kids are either going to be traumatized & end up hating their parents or grow up with the same attitude of spoiled narcissistic entitlement. 🤦♀
Im not surprised the queen was angry, I WAS TOO WHEN I FOUND OUT. This is just another sickening thing that harry and meghan has done to the Queen. They made out that they would call her Elizabeth..
I cringed when I heard Harry had named his daughter Lilibet. The explanation that the Queen had given her permission - -sounded like a lie, right out of the gate. How insulting to think the Queen would be so easily manipulated. That poor child!
Megan will push every boundary she can, she really has no respect for anyone. Unfortunately Harry got hoodwinked by her charm, but beyond that she is vindictive and despicable IMO. I feel for their children. Regards from Ireland 🇮🇪
They KNEW using the name would be sacrilege to the Queen, and hurtful. This is evident by the fact that they had to come up with a way to be verbally deceitful to her face.
As a loyalist to the beloved Queen Elizabeth, that enormous PR move was repugnant! Have some respect. From now on she should be called Lily. Distasteful in every possible way!🚩
Bare faced liars both of them on two counts saying the late Queen had given them her blessing and on the other count why would you do that when lilbet does not even exist.
True..though Meghan claimed her name was Lilibet Diana....but ironically, nobody could find it registered in California...though there was a Diana Mary Mount-Batten Windsor, born on the same day in L.A. But then, nothing but lies and photoshop surround both the surrogate/closet kids.
The Llilebet nickname was a very personal name for our wonderful Queen Elizabeth. Used only by close trusted family members. This is especially gross as our Queen was suffering during this time.
Yes I think they did it to show the late HMTQ they can do everything they want to do and that was one of them by using her love nickname Prince Philip gave her really
Let’s face it. They were planning on monetising our late Queen’s pet name. They have absolutely no respect for our late Queen or her feelings. She will never be known as Lillibet to the British people.
I hope every time they say ‘Lilibet’ out loud to their daughter, they feel awkward and ashamed, and it makes them shudder and reflect on the hurt they caused to the Queen in her final days! I wish Harry had never met Meghan - nuff said!
Rachel Ragland did it deliberately to upset her Majesty as she knew it was HMQ's special nickname... Ms Markle doesnt like being called Rachel Ragland. So in future we should universally reference her as Rachel Ragland .
The thing is, Lilibet is not actually a name. It was a pet name for the Queen, uaed by close family. I had a nickname as a child, which came about in the same way. I wouldn't expect a baby to be christened with it.
From articles I read at the time, I understood that H & R did call the Queen. However, they only asked her if they could name their daughter with her name. The Queen naturally assumed that they wanted to call her Elizabeth. It was for Elizabeth that she gave approval, NOT Lilibet. So, of course, her Majesty was angry when she discovered that H & R deceived her.
Considering they both seem to hate the late Queen, I don’t know why they’d want to name their child after her. They made her last few years miserable and this was just the final dig
I feel so sorry for the Queen. In her last years she constantly had to deal with her misbehaved disgusting Grandchild and his narcissistic wife. I’m absolutely furious 🤮 even more when I learned now that she even worked on her deathbed
The real reason why the Gruesome Twosome ultimately decided to go with Lilibet instead of Elizabeth is because it also the middle name of our much beloved and truly treasured Catherine, Princess of Wales (who was born Catherine Elizabeth Middleton, 9 January 1982). So in many ways, Lilibet was essentially like killing to two birds with one stone. But no matter how absolutely repugnant and Machiavellian the move was to name the little girl Lilibet, in the end it really does not matter anyway. Not only does the move prove that H never really loved his grandmother at all but chances are that as soon as this little girl discovers the truth about the real origin of her and her connection to the mysterious family of strangers in a country far, far away known as Britain, old Lilibet will have not only be asking her so-called parents given that they actually spend more time in the air than by her side why they named her that in the first place, she will probably demand that her name be changed again all the same. And can you just imagine what would happen if she were to actually be emancipated as a teenager and when she was finally free from Montecito, that she legally changed her name to Catherine? Now that would be a very good day for all us, no doubt.
It is so cruel and disrespectful for these two to have used Queen Elizabeth’s Nickname…that is common sense which neither of these two grifters have …rude 😡
If a family member has a pet name that only very close family members use you do not use it for a childs name under any circumstances. Most people would not consider it out of respect.
I flipped when I first found out! Can you imagine the late Queen's reaction?! That's why it is utterly foolish to allow this kid to be officially acknowledged "Princess" by the RF website simply because the vicious coerced them to it by announcing the kid's titles to the world through a US tabloid - PEOPLE"s magazine!
@@stopthelie7752she & Archie may not be after spring Archie’s 5th birthday when it comes out (after 5 years nda) they’re Harry’s children and were born via surrogacy.
Why do you automatically call it "hate" when I'm merely stating my point of view and the facts? You should be calling out the parents for their visciousness instead. Such idiocy!@@stopthelie7752
It's no surprise that the Queen was not amused😠 Apparently both children's names are registered for trademark. Moving on...Wonderful news from Denmark 🇩🇰
@@steveturner6770 The Sussex's are not in their right minds. That's what was reported. Buckingham Palace knew what they were up to when Archie was born.
What else? After naming 1st born Archie. Whaaat?? Not Archibald (master, bold, leader?)((though given Hawwy's thing about bald people.. Didn't want his son called "baldie" ;/ OR Archimedes (Master/leading THINKER??) ridiculous!
Of all the crass and despicable things these two have done over the years...of the many disrespectful things they have said about or done to the Royal family...this I despise 🤨 However, it is annoying when people insist on saying it was the Queen's 'nickname' rather than her 'petname'. It was a petname since childhood that only the family, and especially her husband, used for her and the difference is that this is a very PERSONAL thing; whereas a nickname is the often silly, sometimes disrespectful 🙄 thing you might be called at school...and perhaps by the family...but still, something very different...! 🤨 [That will have to be my rant of the day 🤭]
I feel she may have been angry and upset because her late Majesty knew exactly what was their game was too!! A step too far! But even now they want to try and rile, upset and keep negativity going ! Harrys wife needs her fuel supply, so this is never ending 😢
The Despicable Duo probably asked to name the baby after her. She assumed they meant Elizabeth not the nickname. This is a typical half truth used by narcissists. And they have now punished their own daughter with this situation. Shame on them.
When I read about the name of H’s alleged daughter, I gasped. Not so much as a huge fan of the royal family, but at the massive disrespect of H for his grandmother and late grandfather. H should be ashamed of himself.
Juste the thing mmarkle and her besotted hiusband would do. Stealing a beloved nickname from the queen without permission. So crass, so underhanded, so totally unfeeling. People have been too lenient to these twogrifters.
In 1967 a woman in the maternity unit at a Sussex Hospital wished to name her son Toby and the Registrar refused saying it was a nickname but she could register him as Tobias.
I don`t agree .nothing heard about them for a few years and ,guess what? All their history is altered and everything they have claimed as victimhood is reproduced to prove that they were right. Lets keep calling them out for the lies and crass bad behaviour ,don`t let them get away with it .
It was totally disrespectful of them 💯 That was a special name cherished by our beloved Queen that was solely hers!! NOT ONE of the other Royals thought that Lilibet should be a name for their baby girls so why did H&M think it was THEIR right to name THEIR baby girl with it?? H&M brought both our beloved Queen AND her rock Prince Philip to their early graves in my opinion 🥺😔 RIP Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip 🙏🏻
That poor innocent child lumped with a stolen name, forever tainted thanks to the knowledge she was not named in 'honour' of her great grandmother but as vindictive, nasty, clap-back from her vindictive, cruel, psychotic and wholly unfit mother. It just shows the level of cruelty and deep seated pleasure Meghan took in publicly emotionally abusing that dying woman. Any one with common sense could see that Megan knew that stealing that name would cause the Queen much hurt and anguish. Anyone with common sense could see that they lied about what they were going to call her, that they led her to believe they were going call her Elizabeth. Anyone with common sense knew the Queen would NEVER have agreed to them calling her Lilibet. I think this one act alone gives us clear insight to who Megan is as a person. It gives us insight into the levels of maliciousness, the levels of abject cruelty, bullying and emotional abuse Megan will stoop to to cause hurt and pain. She is far more than just a bully, she revels in elder abuse, not just the late Queen, but Charles, Camilla, her own poor dying father. this a pattern, and she's not even ashamed of it. You can bet those rumours that she bullied the staff and Charlotte are true. She clearly targets the most vulnerable, the elderly and children. I feel sorry for her 'kids', they're just pawns, nothing more nothing less.
Why is it that I always feel dirty when hearing or talking about him and what's her name? She's as bankable for anything she says, like a $3 dollar bill. COUNTERFEIT! Give me my William & Cate, ANYDAY. THERES the REAL DEAL.❤
The only thing that came from MM's belly was stuffing!! A hysterectomy means NO WOMB! She had that in her 20's (according allegedly to friends of family..her true first ex husband not Trevor Engelson, he was number 2)
I don’t know how true this but I read that Harry’s daughter was not registered as Lillibet. In fact there seems to be no record of her. This was from a comment made by a Registrar in Los Angeles.
Her late majesty had said after Prince Phillips death, that she didn't want the name used. This was a disrespectful move by the sparkles.
They don't sparkle.
Absolutely shameful
Deliberately spiteful.
And then to attempt through lawyers to bully the Press and BBC to remove the factual story .
It sums them up ,in my eyes ,spiteful bullies
in the States she's known as the CarParkle because of where the paps are always catching her. All the best to you!!
Vile to the bone
It’s more than naff that they used the late Queen’s nickname, it’s controlling and manipulative. It certainly wasn’t out of any fondness for her, it was designed to stick the knife in. That much is obvious.
I thiught she stold the name from one of Andrews daughters? One was going to use the name but Harry's borrowed child came first so Nutmeg snatched it first.
Sadly disgusting, seriously hurtful and utterly beyond the pale. And we hear almost daily of more and more and more despicable tricks they have pulled, and the Late Queen was totally polite in saying "Harry is too much In Love"..... the todger rules, and takes orders without even querying the logic or legitimacy!!
@@highcountrydelatite Oh for sure! There’s always more pressing issues than the one we’re currently focusing on, what ever it is. However, each issue deserves attention.
It was payback for telling them they couldn't use the word Royal.
@@highcountrydelatite Well if you and ‘your country’ don’t care why are you on this thread?
I thought I read that the late Queen had stated after Prince Philip died that the nickname went either him, never to be used again. That aside, Harry and Meghan were cruel in their deliberate appropriation of her name, after her repeated no’s to them.
Yes. She didn’t want her nickname to be used again after Prince Philip died. Using the private name to name their child was disrespectful and I’m sure it was the vulgar MM’s idea.
What can be done to revoke that name and I believe the Queen would have been furious. Harry didn’t decided - it was Meghan and Meghan only!🇦🇺🦘🐨
The word "NO" to MM means "YES" - you can't tell me what to do. This is the same women that openly declared that the Queen didn't own the word "Royal". It's all about respect and we all know MM has none of that.
Well, it is a well-known fact that Markle does not like being told no.
@@kelsogirl562yes, it's so funny how MM thought that after 5 minutes of being 'royal' and thought she was more 'royal' than the Queen and should be able to register the word as her 'brand name' when the Queen had clearly explained to her that Anything to do with Royalty could Not be Used to make money!!!!
Harry is a liar. the name Lilibet was already trademarked before her birth and Harry is on television saying that the conversation with the queen asking permission was AFTER Lili was born. disgusting to use the personal name that was to be retired after her husband's death.
I didn't know about trademarks. I had seen videos showing domain names and dates they bought them.
You cannot trademark a name. Why on earth would you say such a thing?
@@steveturner6770 I think perhaps lemonysnikett is talking about the domain names. H&M or just M bought quite a few... I think several of them were to do with politics. Others were variations of Lilibet Diana Elizabeth. Funny, none of them contained beloved granny Doria's name
@@steveturner6770the trademark domain apparently was done before the circus🎪wedding
It's just a name, i name my dog lili,am i in trouble? If I'm great grandmother and one of my grandchild son use my name for his daughter, I'm very proud. The queen is racist because Megan is haft black.
Claimed the monarchy was horrible and racist to her but names their daughter after the Queen. The math isn't mathing. 😂
Yep and not her dear black mother
😂😂😂😂👍
😂
Not mathing at all
They were never racists, Megan is throwing things across the pond like a child 'Billy nae mates' in a school playground. Purely for attention and this is one of those pointless empty moon bump balls she has paid the press for to keep them relevent. Just rehashing the rubbish bin she lives in with her lies....
He MUST have known choosing this name was way over the top.
¿Por qué?
Yep. Good
Harry knows he just doesn't care. Harry is showing the Royal Family we can do whatever we want. Harry and Meghan's attitude is disgusting.
He just likes having that PoA. He could have had anyone from his own social strata and lived quietly, but, of course, no.
The names are registered for trade.
That’s bc the queen was DECEIVED! Her name was Elizabeth. H asked about her name, NOT her private nickname and M & H KNEW that.
I believe that Harry thought Meghan was going with Elizabeth but Meghan changed it after the “blessing” from the Queen.
Meghan knew it would cause distress . She knew exactly what she was doing. H just went along with his wife’s wishes because what ever Meghan wants … Meghan gets !!
Sounds like my ex-wife, knowing just how to push my family's buttons
Yes! Piers had a cardiac arrest and had to go for a double - heart and sphincter reattachment surgeries.
Harry has no backbone. What a loser.
@@julianpetkov8320hahahahahahaha cannot. Stop. Laughing. 💘
@@angelasongcheung6796 Cheers, Angela. 😀
We all know what happened. Harry said to the Queen we’d like to call her after you. The Queen quite naturally thought it would be Elizabeth.
100%
Suprise, suprise.. H&M did something they weren't approved to do, lied, caused insult and upset to the Queen personally.... how unusual!! (Sarcasm? Yes!!) MM wasn't allowed to monetise 'Royal' or 'Sussex Royal' etc... so it was just another stab in the back to the poor Queen 😢
I’m pretty sure her LMQE2 has found out by now that there is no such baby issued from that woman who ensnared Harry. Thank goodness!
Ok Grandma
The Queen doesn't own the name Lilibet and Harry and Meghan need no permission or approval. Betty being a bitter old bat to the end.
Their two children should have been Christened Archibald and Elizabeth and then the option to shorten is theirs - the contempt of M & H for sensible traditions is breathtaking.
They should have used Philibeth, so the imperial concubine didn't feel left out.
I just call it Betty. Until I see OFFICIAL documentation on those kids they don’t exist
They can christen their children any name. They don’t have to be the full version. But using the Queens private nickname is insulting to her.
Low class
They can but should they? Those are really low class names. Sounds like they were born to a couple of chavs. @ally_bally6728
I thought it was awful at the time to take something that was so personal to the Queen as their own. I'm not surprised they didn't have her blessing, despite their claims. I don't imagine that the Queen had many things that were solely her own, without some sort of tradition or heritage or public claim on it, but this was one thing that was private, individual, sweet and just hers. And they spoiled it. These are not good people.
Yup and that must be why the late Queen point blank REFUSED to have a photo taken with Lilibet. It all makes sense now
Perfect analysis 👏🏼 they really are the most vile disgusting pair. How the HELL they think for a moment they can repair the damage or their reputation is mind boggling! I would love to have a face to face with Megaliar & I’m not keen on confrontations but I would tell her just what I think ! 🤬🇬🇧
@@jujajulaHMTQ was much more clever than the harkles
Wow… imagine having a problem with what they named their child…
@@tlb2970 The late Queen was very wise. I am willing to bet that is one of the reasons why a Windsor christening was also refused. In the end the little girl was christened in the garden of the montecito house
Meghan just likes to rile everyone. Btw if she’s so proud of her children, why don’t we see them? I think I’ve a good idea why. They certainly don’t spend much time with them.
She probably has to pay child support to borrow her daughter from her parents.
Lilibet Diana - names given to grift! 💰💰💰
The children don't even exist!! The toxic duo are just pathetic!! Liars thru and thru!!
@@helengormlie966 Strange how Tom Bower, in his book Revenge, only ever describes both children as Hasbeen's, never markle's.
I doubt that she's very angry due to being dead, are we back to the ghost of Diana?
They were trying to insult the Monarchy
The whole Monarchy is evil IMHO. From letting corrupt politicians abuse citizens in the colonies through corruption scandals and COVID lockdowns, to participation in the WEF, and promotion of the climate change hoax. Even William is involved in that.
By now, after all that's happened, just their existence has become offensive.
Merch still trying to take control
She is a major loser
And they succeeded.
And in the procetth, made foolth of themselveth.
So dispicable of them, not surprising though
Andrew ! Andrew ! ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️
I don’t blame the queen, how completely disrespectful.
You seem to cope realky well with pedos,abusers and bullies.Prince Andrew,Jimmy Savile etc ...These are the people linked to the royal family that brits are proud of
But how can the Queen be very angry with her grandson if she’s been dead since 2022
@@Curious-z8h 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.Andrew dirty moves won't go away even if thet want to use this crap,this nonsense to distract people.Let's not forget that it was the queen who have him money to settle.She didn't want her son to steal the limelight during the platinum jubilee celebration
Government: We have no money for anything. So we are going to have to cut funding to your schools, hospitals, local council services, and those benefits you rely on to eat. We are making the tough decisions.
Also Government: We have found money to give paintings of the King to all of those services. Because you need reminding of your place, peasants.
They told the Queen they were naming their daughter after her. She thought they meant Elizabeth so she thought it was sweet. They knew she wouldn't agree to Lilbeth so she was furious. Those 2 can never be trusted.
Never ever
Anyone who has a pet name in their family knows exactly how insulting this is for someone to steal it or even use it. It was outrageous and disgusting.
Ruthless duo
Well said !!
The skidmarkles are petty and ruthless.
They even had Beatrice let them film the queen's little childhood cottage to mock a tea party.
This is Meghan....USING ANYTHING SHE CAN TO FOREVER ASSOCIATE HERSELF TO THE ROYAL FAMILY! I knew this at the instant i learned she had stolen both these names, the Queen's AND Diana's, SHE'S ONLY USED THE ROYAL FAMILY, IN EVERY INSTANCE, AS A STEPPING STONE TO HER DESPERATE NEED FOR FAME!
I don't agree, if they named it Elizabeth that would've been much different, but to name it after the one name that QE stated she didn't want used again, after her husband passed, then that takes on a whole other story...@@user-gr8ii8jr9o
And that must be why the late Queen point blank REFUSED to have a photo taken with Lilibet. It all makes sense now
No just that. Any photograph, no matter how private the setting, would be sold to the higgest bidder the next day, along with sound clips from a hidden microphone.
I don't believe the late Queen ever saw the invisible child never mind have a photo taken with her.
Plus the fact that No Children actually exist.
I don't think the late Queen blamed the child in the least. She had no say-so in the name and no fault in her parent's manipulations.
It's going to be very interesting to see if Megan and Harry raise a couple of "train wrecks" or a couple of actually good people because they rebel against who their parents are. I am in no way expecting anything from middle ground, lol!
MEGAN A CAREER ACTRESS INSTINCTIVE DRAMA QUEEN
Keith Middlefoot is a bit mediocre at playing a "woman" himself.
Absolutely terrible actress.
Backfired on them. Every time that child is mentioned we will be reminded of her parent’s disgusting duplicitous behaviour 🤷♀️🤬🤬🤬🇬🇧
I feel ill ever time I hear that name.
That poor child. Mother is a monster and she just put all this stuff on a kid.
Who cares if the queen didn’t like it?
I don’t believe for a second that she didn’t… but who cares anyway?
No not going to happen, it will come as a win for megga sponge that she went against the Royal Family..
@@WotsisFace pfftttt😂
I think it's a pretty name. @@janebaker4912
Meghan and Harry do not know when to honor someone’s boundaries. They were more than rude to the gracious majesty Queen Elizabeth. Sad
Hazi and maggots are dumb stupid
Trauma of having to be a spare in kate and wills shadow broke the camels back it seems?
This is abuse of the elderly.
Meghan has no concept of age ,she`s happy to abuse anyone
😂😂😂 Get a grip
@@ClaireM2345no you get a grip 🤬
@@BarbaraMacDonald-bq1lb you and Lorraine need to, not me😂
@@ClaireM2345 your an idiot
If Queen Elizabeth was angry, I imagine it was fuelled by hurt, that was her childhood name full of memories of her dad and her sister. Harry claimed to ‘adore’ her but his actions proved the opposite by the end of her life 😕
Andrew ! Andrew ! ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️
It was a flat out exploitation of the relationship & hugely disrespectful to the privacy & dignity of Her Majesty. Harry's too dumb to see it & Skidmarkle doesn't give a rat's ass if it'll further her ulterior motives.
Harry knew that calling his daughter Lilibet would cause our Queen enormous unhappiness.
Why would it cause unhappiness?
And yet he did it and claimed to have love the Queen. We should never ever believe anything about harry and his awful wife. #boycottharkles
@@stopthelie7752 Because that name was very personal to the late Queen. And that must be why the late Queen point blank REFUSED to have a photo taken with Lilibet. It all makes sense now
H is so spiteful and vicious.
@@stopthelie7752because it was her families nickname to her that only her parents, sister and her husband called her and she said when Prince Philip died it was not to be used again
It was grossly disrespectful to the late Queen. But then they are always disrespectful 😏
Don't you know? THEY are the ones who must be respected 🫠 or you're a racist.
It was nothing to do with paying tribute to the queen but self aggrandisement to them with the implied closest connection to the Queen the highest position in the Royal Hierarchy. This made worse by the fact Merckle openly mocked her. The only thing they deserve is the tower.
Harry is close to the Queen and will always be he is his grandson, infact he was the one closest to the Queen, I heard from the royal experts.
@@stopthelie7752 RUGBBISH. Harry was one of her 8 grandchildren. The late Queen was very close to Zara who was her first grandchild and also Sophies daughter. Harry likes to make out that he was the favourite which is not true it is just that he was the second son of Charles who was the heir and as Diana died the late Queen did look out for William and Harry. If he was so close to the late Queen he would have said so in his book yet he talks of being very lonely and being alone alot during the school holidays.
@@jujajula Because the Queen was very busy.
@user-ig7lv1rw6z zara is not the oldest grandchild, her brother Peter is. She is not the daughter of Edward's wife but Princess Anne, the Queens daughter.
Harry was close to the Queen..in his own mind! What an arrogant jerk!
I get it. This nickname is very dear to her , the name her parents used to call her , it is invasive . Meghan for her all her racism claim , she could have honored her mom doria , but no, all the name should go to the white family , doria wasnt enough to be included in the first biracial daughter of the royal family. I get the queen , i get her. oh wait ,the squad is going to claim racism on this one, that is Meghan's go to fight back.
Henceforth that girl will be called Sorry --Dorry.
And that must be why the late Queen point blank REFUSED to have a photo taken with Lilibet. It all makes sense now. I recall at the time being very surprised that they had not called their daughter Doria given that Doria is the only grandparent the children are exposed to and given that Doria is the first black grand parent. Interesting.....
@@hazelmccloy1136Unconscious, of course!
😂😂😂@@Romdormer
It was presumptuous and rude of the Sussexes to name their daughter the family's private nickname for the Queen. I never believed the Queen blessed that decision for one second. As Mr. Cole says, if they want to HONOR the Queen, name their daughter Elizabeth. But it wasn't about honoring the Queen; it was about drawing attention to themselves.
Who cares…
They've been rude from day one and haven't let up for a second 🇺🇸
@@WotsisFace thousands of people , clearly ! Anyone who loved the Queen cares , duh !
@@englishrose11 the person who says they speak for everybody is wrong 100% of the time…. That’s you 😉
You keep worshipping that weird family who hate people like you, and I’ll just keep thinking it’s weird and a bit backwards to do so…
What these people want for us is gross, and you’re fully supporting them like a muppet.
And “sticking it to” the beloved Queen.
Michael is a great guest; lots of insider info & well told.
This was a calculated move by the Harkle's thinking they could monetise the connection - nothing is sacred to this pair.
Privacy is just for them, they ride roughshod over their respective families ' privacy and get paid for it. Despicable in any family situation but especially so on the world stage. It's about time we all ignored this couple.
But we can't ignore them.They are good for a laugh any day of the week.
Narcissists will lovebomb, then attack and gaslight. The cycle will go round and round. I feel that they thought they could wipe the slate clean by taking the name Lillibet as an obnoxious way of lovebombing QEII, thinking she would be flattered, but it backfired spectacularly.
The queen is the narcissist. She is the emotionally damaged reason her family are all freaks and pederasts. She was so weird, cold, unfit to be a mother.
They also want to use the Children's names to profit by.
Only someone completely blindfolded would think it was an honour ,after the Queen had already requested that NO-ONE close ever use the name again.
It was her reminder of the husband she had so recently lost .
Yup as usual they thought they were being innovative only for the late Queen to point blank REFUSE to have a photo taken with Lilibet. That refusal spoke VOLUMES....
It goes to show just how much those two Megaliers loved Queen Elizabeth!!! They didn't care in the least!!! And still!!! They continue lieing every breath they take!!! What a wonderful legacy they're making of theirselves to go down in history!!! 🇱🇷
I was surprised by the name. I thought a poor choice. What is wrong with the name "Elizabeth,"? It's my daughter's name. It is a marvelous name!🇺🇸
Exactly. They even came out later and said they would call her Lilly for sort, so what’s the point? We all know the point!
I agree. By now, I am suspicious of everything they do!@@beammeup9504
Why not include Doria? If race was such an issue to Meghan and her roots why not honour her own mother?
Because of money and attention.
HRH PRINCESS CATHERINES WAS BORN CATHERINE ELIZABETH MIDDLETON il bet any money they didn’t want Elizabeth for that reason aswell.
The Montechito pair amaze me,how can you Christen a doll.
I always thought it was not a compliment, but a 'stab' at the Queen and the RF, by Meghan herself, and dim Harry just went along with it, not realising why Meg chose it specifically (and yes, it is almost always the mother who has the final say on their child's name, in Western countries anyway).
I'm sure that was Harry's wife's idea, but when Harry called the Queen, he duped her (and duped is too nice for what they did). His own grandmother ... He's despicable. We know his wife is, too. When the name was released to the press, she must have been furious ... I was furious too and I'm in the US. I think most people felt the same.
The despicable duo should feel shame, but they dont. We don't really know if "Little Betty" even exists. I refuse to call this invisible child "Lilibet".
I'm American too & I was appalled when they announced her name. I don't doubt for one millisecond that Harry lied when he called his grandmother for permission. He led her on, making her believe the kid's name would be Elizabeth. This was not an act of homage to the Queen but rather just another jab of the knife in her back. I refer to Hank & Skank's spawn as Merchie & Lilibucks (if they truly do exist). I really do hope they are fake because imagine having those two narcissistic lying weasels as your parents. Those kids are either going to be traumatized & end up hating their parents or grow up with the same attitude of spoiled narcissistic entitlement. 🤦♀
I was absolutely furious too.
Im not surprised the queen was angry, I WAS TOO WHEN I FOUND OUT. This is just another sickening thing that harry and meghan has done to the Queen. They made out that they would call her Elizabeth..
I cringed when I heard Harry had named his daughter Lilibet. The explanation that the Queen had given her permission - -sounded like a lie, right out of the gate. How insulting to think the Queen would be so easily manipulated. That poor child!
It’s creepy of them. Especially after tearing the royals down in interviews
What baby ???
Megan will push every boundary she can, she really has no respect for anyone. Unfortunately Harry got hoodwinked by her charm, but beyond that she is vindictive and despicable IMO. I feel for their children. Regards from Ireland 🇮🇪
Megan's " charm " well that's a new name for what she uses as bait
Totally agree from nz
They KNEW using the name would be sacrilege to the Queen, and hurtful. This is evident by the fact that they had to come up with a way to be verbally deceitful to her face.
DISRESPECTFUL to the core to HMTQ.
May HMTQ rest in peace!
For goodness sake all this over a name
As a loyalist to the beloved Queen Elizabeth, that enormous PR move was repugnant! Have some respect. From now on she should be called Lily. Distasteful in every possible way!🚩
Bare faced liars both of them on two counts saying the late Queen had given them her blessing and on the other count why would you do that when lilbet does not even exist.
Honestly we are betting she would be called ,Diana, we were all shocked when he used the queens nickname
Diana is Lilibet's middle name.
True..though Meghan claimed her name was Lilibet Diana....but ironically, nobody could find it registered in California...though there was a Diana Mary Mount-Batten Windsor, born on the same day in L.A. But then, nothing but lies and photoshop surround both the surrogate/closet kids.
@@Rose-jz6ix I know but we all though it be her first name , but it would probably be a middle name if not ,
They did it on purpose to hurt the Queen. Harry should have known better.
@@deborahrobben7721 you mean the puppet , and Meghan, it was her fault
The Llilebet nickname was a very personal name for our wonderful Queen Elizabeth. Used only by close trusted family members. This is especially gross as our Queen was suffering during this time.
Yes I think they did it to show the late HMTQ they can do everything they want to do and that was one of them by using her love nickname Prince Philip gave her really
Let’s face it. They were planning on monetising our late Queen’s pet name. They have absolutely no respect for our late Queen or her feelings. She will never be known as Lillibet to the British people.
Lady C quoted that there was 'cold fury' at the Palace over that naming.
Does she live at the palace, what is her connection to the royal family? NIL.
I hope every time they say ‘Lilibet’ out loud to their daughter, they feel awkward and ashamed, and it makes them shudder and reflect on the hurt they caused to the Queen in her final days! I wish Harry had never met Meghan - nuff said!
Why is it anyone's business?
Rachel Ragland did it deliberately to upset her Majesty as she knew it was HMQ's special nickname...
Ms Markle doesnt like being called Rachel Ragland. So in future we should universally reference her as Rachel Ragland .
👏👏👏
Perfect! And the supposed child ONLY called "Lily" !!!
Ohhh that's a very good name to call M RACHEL RAGLAND and calling her daughter LITTLE DORIA😅😅😅😅😅
Rachel Ragland it is !👍
Agree Rachel ragland
I thought it was emotional blackmail having herd that the Queen was a very private person
The naming of children in France is still subject to ‘proper’ recognised names. As it should be
Is Meghan french though?
Meghan is a Welsh name
I thought it was of Jamaican origin? ---- She is black after all.🤪
Both the Skidmarkles kids have nicknames instead of proper names , weird.
No, the French are generally sophisticated , so no, definitely, no. @@steveturner6770
It confirms how hateful and toxic this couple is.
Lovely story about the Danish queen!
They thought the name was cute and snatched it, disrespectfully. Very opportunistic.
I believe it was payback because Queen Elizabeth said they couldn't use royal in their brand
The Queen does not own the word royal. It is a universal word in the englkish language.
Megan was used to break up family.
'Lilibet' was on the card on Prince Philip's coffin, maybe someone took note.
They named her Lillibet ON PURPOSE
The thing is, Lilibet is not actually a name. It was a pet name for the Queen, uaed by close family. I had a nickname as a child, which came about in the same way. I wouldn't expect a baby to be christened with it.
With all the death in the world, why is this even news.
From articles I read at the time, I understood that H & R did call the Queen. However, they only asked her if they could name their daughter with her name. The Queen naturally assumed that they wanted to call her Elizabeth. It was for Elizabeth that she gave approval, NOT Lilibet. So, of course, her Majesty was angry when she discovered that H & R deceived her.
Stop believing everything you read 🤣
At least she reads :P @@ClaireM2345
I did a sharp intake of breath when the name was announced! I instinctively knew this was wrong ! 😮
Considering they both seem to hate the late Queen, I don’t know why they’d want to name their child after her. They made her last few years miserable and this was just the final dig
SOS blahblahblah
Week after week, there’s news of the shocking and disrespectful behaviour of the couple who wants privacy 🙄
I feel so sorry for the Queen. In her last years she constantly had to deal with her misbehaved disgusting Grandchild and his narcissistic wife.
I’m absolutely furious 🤮 even more when I learned now that she even worked on her deathbed
get a life
The real reason why the Gruesome Twosome ultimately decided to go with Lilibet instead of Elizabeth is because it also the middle name of our much beloved and truly treasured Catherine, Princess of Wales (who was born Catherine Elizabeth Middleton, 9 January 1982). So in many ways, Lilibet was essentially like killing to two birds with one stone. But no matter how absolutely repugnant and Machiavellian the move was to name the little girl Lilibet, in the end it really does not matter anyway. Not only does the move prove that H never really loved his grandmother at all but chances are that as soon as this little girl discovers the truth about the real origin of her and her connection to the mysterious family of strangers in a country far, far away known as Britain, old Lilibet will have not only be asking her so-called parents given that they actually spend more time in the air than by her side why they named her that in the first place, she will probably demand that her name be changed again all the same. And can you just imagine what would happen if she were to actually be emancipated as a teenager and when she was finally free from Montecito, that she legally changed her name to Catherine? Now that would be a very good day for all us, no doubt.
whats the big fuss about a name? Who cares.
7:57 Harry and Meghan ,don't care who they offend they are serial offenders.
Clearly, she wouldn't have been happy.
I cant even begin to imagine how much QE2 HATED Megyn
She was a good judge of character.
Yet the guy accused of rape was her favourite son? Her values must have been distorted in my opinion.
@El.Cid17 like you said he WAS her favorite son. No, her values were not distorted, your facts are
@@randomvintagefilm273 You don't know that, you've made it up, irrelevant.
@@steveturner6770 Grow up.
It is so cruel and disrespectful for these two to have used Queen Elizabeth’s Nickname…that is common sense which neither of these two grifters have …rude 😡
Why are so upset?
Yes totally rude and disrespectful.
If a family member has a pet name that only very close family members use you do not use it for a childs name under any circumstances. Most people would not consider it out of respect.
I flipped when I first found out! Can you imagine the late Queen's reaction?! That's why it is utterly foolish to allow this kid to be officially acknowledged "Princess" by the RF website simply because the vicious coerced them to it by announcing the kid's titles to the world through a US tabloid - PEOPLE"s magazine!
Stop hating on the innocent kid she is a princess by birth.
@@stopthelie7752she & Archie may not be after spring Archie’s 5th birthday when it comes out (after 5 years nda) they’re Harry’s children and were born via surrogacy.
Why do you automatically call it "hate" when I'm merely stating my point of view and the facts? You should be calling out the parents for their visciousness instead. Such idiocy!@@stopthelie7752
It's no surprise that the Queen was not amused😠
Apparently both children's names are registered for trademark.
Moving on...Wonderful news from Denmark 🇩🇰
How can you trademark name? No one in their right mind would even think you could.
@@steveturner6770 The Sussex's are not in their right minds.
That's what was reported.
Buckingham Palace knew what they were up to when Archie was born.
@@steveturner6770 🙄🤦🏻♀️
What else?
After naming 1st born Archie. Whaaat??
Not Archibald (master, bold, leader?)((though given Hawwy's thing about bald people.. Didn't want his son called "baldie" ;/
OR
Archimedes (Master/leading THINKER??)
ridiculous!
Of all the crass and despicable things these two have done over the years...of the many disrespectful things they have said about or done to the Royal family...this I despise 🤨 However, it is annoying when people insist on saying it was the Queen's 'nickname' rather than her 'petname'. It was a petname since childhood that only the family, and especially her husband, used for her and the difference is that this is a very PERSONAL thing; whereas a nickname is the often silly, sometimes disrespectful 🙄 thing you might be called at school...and perhaps by the family...but still, something very different...! 🤨 [That will have to be my rant of the day 🤭]
I absolutely agree with you.
I hurt for her Majesty as soon as I heard it.
That poor child, vile parents.
Her real parents need a reprimand for allowing this pair of idiots to claim her as theirs!
Is it not time to let the queen rest in peace and just Forget Harry and move on ?
Why does kate have a position in the military she has never served a day in her life 😮😮😮😮😮
I feel she may have been angry and upset because her late Majesty knew exactly what was their game was too!! A step too far! But even now they want to try and rile, upset and keep negativity going ! Harrys wife needs her fuel supply, so this is never ending 😢
We all knew that she named that child lilibet not out of love but hatred.
Who's we?
Everybody with a brain.
The Despicable Duo probably asked to name the baby after her. She assumed they meant Elizabeth not the nickname. This is a typical half truth used by narcissists.
And they have now punished their own daughter with this situation. Shame on them.
When I read about the name of H’s alleged daughter, I gasped. Not so much as a huge fan of the royal family, but at the massive disrespect of H for his grandmother and late grandfather.
H should be ashamed of himself.
Juste the thing mmarkle and her besotted hiusband would do. Stealing a beloved nickname from the queen without permission. So crass, so underhanded, so totally unfeeling. People have been too lenient to these twogrifters.
In 1967 a woman in the maternity unit at a Sussex Hospital wished to name her son Toby and the Registrar refused saying it was a nickname but she could register him as Tobias.
Goodness. The British people are a unique bunch, aren’t you?
Signed, a curious American 🇺🇸
Patronizing aren’t you
- from 🇺🇸
one reason for the name MONEY
Well, the best thing is just not to talk about Harry and Meghan. But, the media won't do that, so do it yourself, members of the public.
I don`t agree .nothing heard about them for a few years and ,guess what?
All their history is altered and everything they have claimed as victimhood is reproduced to prove that they were right.
Lets keep calling them out for the lies and crass bad behaviour ,don`t let them get away with it .
@@gillcawthorn7572 same for Andrew. No one should get away with rape no matter how much they paid the victim.
It was totally disrespectful of them 💯
That was a special name cherished by our beloved Queen that was solely hers!!
NOT ONE of the other Royals thought that Lilibet should be a name for their baby girls so why did H&M think it was THEIR right to name THEIR baby girl with it??
H&M brought both our beloved Queen AND her rock Prince Philip to their early graves in my opinion 🥺😔
RIP Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip 🙏🏻
An Australian Married a prince and becomes a queen An American (actually 2 ) married a prince and becomes a laughing stock and an exile.
If so, it appears to be a kind of taunting and, yes, bullying!
I heard her speech to her husband. She is so in love with him. She says everytime a restaurant asks him he's finished
.he says..No. I'm Danish.
😅😅😅😅😅
I think I read somewhere that Archie is a nickname for Prince George and if this is true, both of them can't even be original in naming their kids
No it wasn't a nickname, every senior royal has a code name for security reasons just as Prince Phillips was The Forth bridge.
Why have so many names anyway? Do they get more money from the taxpayer the more names thay have?
Bloody Harry Hewitt! WAAAAAHHH
Either Henry Hewitt or Henry Herbert. (Henry Herbert, Earl of Pembroke)
That poor innocent child lumped with a stolen name, forever tainted thanks to the knowledge she was not named in 'honour' of her great grandmother but as vindictive, nasty, clap-back from her vindictive, cruel, psychotic and wholly unfit mother. It just shows the level of cruelty and deep seated pleasure Meghan took in publicly emotionally abusing that dying woman. Any one with common sense could see that Megan knew that stealing that name would cause the Queen much hurt and anguish. Anyone with common sense could see that they lied about what they were going to call her, that they led her to believe they were going call her Elizabeth. Anyone with common sense knew the Queen would NEVER have agreed to them calling her Lilibet. I think this one act alone gives us clear insight to who Megan is as a person. It gives us insight into the levels of maliciousness, the levels of abject cruelty, bullying and emotional abuse Megan will stoop to to cause hurt and pain. She is far more than just a bully, she revels in elder abuse, not just the late Queen, but Charles, Camilla, her own poor dying father. this a pattern, and she's not even ashamed of it. You can bet those rumours that she bullied the staff and Charlotte are true. She clearly targets the most vulnerable, the elderly and children. I feel sorry for her 'kids', they're just pawns, nothing more nothing less.
Why is it that I always feel dirty when hearing or talking about him and what's her name? She's as bankable for anything she says, like a $3 dollar bill. COUNTERFEIT! Give me my William & Cate, ANYDAY. THERES the REAL DEAL.❤
The only thing that came from MM's belly was stuffing!! A hysterectomy means NO WOMB! She had that in her 20's (according allegedly to friends of family..her true first ex husband not Trevor Engelson, he was number 2)
I don’t know how true this but I read that Harry’s daughter was not registered as Lillibet. In fact there seems to be no record of her. This was from a comment made by a Registrar in Los Angeles.
Maybe Mary....