Monetising the name Lillibet is disgusting, particularly when it was given to the Queen by her parents and sister. When Harry told the Queen, before he married, "what Megan wants, Megan gets" sums this up perfectly.
@@ElledieWildAndFree They registered a domain names 'Lilibet Diana' and Lili Diana before the child was born. What purpose does that serve if you don't intend monetising it? Why don't you try registering the same domain names and see what happens!
Well they potentially can because they have taken out many trademark names and Domain names using the kids names in a variety of orders.@@ElledieWildAndFree
My heart breaks more for the Queen, how much more pain did she carry that we will never know. I’m American but I feel as badly for her as if it was my own grandmother
I couldn't agree more Sandra. THAT marriage, when it ends ..... will be VERY tragic and life threatening for Harry and I am NOT trying to cover up for him and his behaviour, just concerned and their children.
the late Queen was furious about not giving permission to the Sussex’s for using her nickname,she especially asked everyone not to use it after Prince Phillip died,the Sussex’s lied about getting permission so that shows you how disrespectful they were towards her,the Queen was a great judge of character and spot on calling Meghan Markle an evil person!
Oh Meghan is evil because she gave her daughter a name. How dastardly. I mean how does she sleep at night knowing the OAP viewers of GBnews are mad at her
@@ElledieWildAndFreeit's be cos the press & the DM@!l in particular dine on the tr@!tor h@ter h@rry narrative of lies. They registered trademark of names with some included P+P titles & the domains were found registered before the circus🎪wedding took place. Coincidentally their daughter was born on the date+month of QEll's succession to the throne. Mmm🤔. QEll did not say 'YES' to L*l*bet - QEll was never asked about using L*l*bet - QEll was saying 'YES' referring to Elizabeth _inline with her other grandaughters & greatgrandaughters_ honouring 'Elizabeth' in part of their names.
This is why I hope both Archie and Lili don't exist and that they are rent-a-children and don't live with Harry and Meghan. There were NO newborn photos of Lili at the time she was born, NO Christening photos and NO photos of her with Queen Elizabeth at the Jubilee. Ummm...
What makes it worse is YOU ALL calling ‘the invisible child’ the same name as the Queen. Call her Just Lily….that will do for a child NOT of MM’s body, & not much to do with the R.F.
I'm an American in the USA and there's no LEGAL birth certificate for a Lilibet Diana. Here in America there's a strict law that all births no matter who the parents are must be registered and available for public records.
If she truly copyrighted the name Lillibet. Not only does it prove she’s even more despicable than we thought possible, but proves she did not ask permission from the Queen.
June 22, 2021 The couple confirmed they had purchased the internet domain names before Her Majesty consent. A spokesman for the Sussexes told the Telegraph: “Of course, as is often customary with public figures, a significant number of domains of any potential names that were considered were purchased by their team to protect against the exploitation of the name once it was later chosen and publicly shared.”
1. you can't 'copyright' a name. 2. There is no record of a trademark 3. Registering a domain name with Lillibet in it (if they did that, again there is no website) isn't copyrighting the name. But it does protect them in case someone buys the domain name and turns it into a porn site or something really horrible.) I don't blame them if they did do that, but again the newspapers said they had 'copyrighted' the name, which you can't do. That's bad journalism whichever way you look at it.
@@AL_THOMAS not copyrighted as such, but they have created several Domain names under ‘Lillibet Diana’ and in other forms which are protected from others using them. They did the same with ArchWell.
It proves nothing cause there is no proof it's made up to get people angry at meghan. We can't just leave them alone no we have to make up crap we know nothing bout.
The Queen was spot on when she forced him to marry Diana instead of Camila? Nah, the Queen wasn’t spot on then. The Queen was spot on when she made choices that kept her family in one piece. But she could do very little about her heir taking the crown, despite knowing it would have been better suited for the head of her daughter. The Queen made do with the family she had. Unlike this rancid excuse of a king. For shame
I do not even care so much how personal the name was, the point is, these two parents LIED about the Queen's so-called blessing and they also LIED to the Queen about it, like the conman and con-woman they are. In my view there can be NO honour in receiving a name in such a dishonourable contrived way. If I were the young princess, I would change my name one day to something else as soon as I can decide about it autonomously. They have set her up for life as a spectacle by giving her a name under these circumstances. Downright dishonesty; there is nothing royal about that, in my view. What a sad and ill legacy to saddle your child up with. Your child will inevitably know from the press that her name was stolen, that her parents tricked her grandmother into this. What an utter disgrace.
If this child exists, with two narcissistic parents and a maternal grandmother who's allegedly the same as her daughter, presumably she'll carry on cashing in.
Not only did they lie about the blessing the Queen had not given but via their lawyers( the same one that was on their Netflix documentary ) aggressively went after the BBC who had reported the Queen had not consented . So they tried to shut down the free press so as to improve their brand . Disgraceful to try and limit accurate reporting by threatening more legal action .
@@sandradavies7804 She may not become a grifter just like her mother, it's hard to tell. And by the time she grows up, William will be King and he will not allow her to cash in on Queen Elizabeth's personal and private nickname.
I felt nothing but sadness when I read the Queen's response to Harry's and Meghan's duplicitous betrayal: she didn't own the palaces or the paintings or the jewels. All that really belonged to her was the intimate childhood nickname used only by her parents, grandparents, sister, niece, nephew, Royal cousins and beloved husband, and the Montecito duo stripped her of that, too. May she rest in peace, and may the Sussexes receive their just desserts for their horrible treatment of their respective families.
The fact she copyrighted the name Lillibet is despicable and shows M's true colours. She plotted and planned to get H and she thought there would be megabucks..... they both deserve to end up with nothing
the Queen certainly knew how to describe a situation beautifully. This has broken my heart. I hope she's happy with her family up there. She's earnt her peace now !!
Who does MM think she is turning Lilibet into a trademark? It was a private nickname for the late Queen, no matter what Megan and Harry do they can never own the name Lilibet...
how come a name can be 'private'?? even my daughter bears the late queen's name. have I also 'stolen' the name from the queen???? a couple of millions in the UK and worldwide bear the queen's name, not just Meghan and Harry who were relatives of the late queen and so as other great-grandchildren that are also named after the queen. if we were all banned from naming our children after the late queen, perhaps she should have chosen to trademark it, which she didn't. The late queen wouldn't mind about such hateful gossips from 'royal experts' and she felt pride when people named their children after her.
I agree. Harry is just swept along and utterly whipped, his balls in her handbag. She’s despicable and Harry has proven to be utterly spineless. She tells him what he thinks.
Harry wouldn't have dreamed up such an idea, more likely to have thought up Diana Elizabeth or the other way around. He would also under different circumstances, have made the suggestion to the Queen first to get her opinion before going ahead.
Harry did love his grandmother but didn't have enough dignity nor integrity to not marry a grifter and a call girl. He should have researched Meghan's background and realized she is shallow and self-centered and has no class.
Yes, I find it hard to believe that he loved his grandmother at all - or perhaps only when she was giving him things... If he'd loved her, he would have visited her when he had the chance.
He’s a disgusting person..and without his titles he is a nobody..he should remember that! The worst is he has no respect, he is an entitled spoilt brat. And no he did not love the Queen his actions have proven otherwise.
He's a spoiled brat who didn't get his way, so he was trying to take down the people who told him "no." "If I can't get what I want, NOBODY will get what they want, I'll tear the whole place down!" (He said as much in interviews, when he said that he didn't want "the institution" and that he was doing this on behalf of his father and brother who were "trapped"- justification in his mind for what he was doing.)
People are 100% entitled to choose whatever name they like for their kids. BUT... copyrighting the name is just plain bonkers and lying about having the late Queen's blessing is pretty evil.
How does someone go against the Queen’s direct wishes not to use her personal nickname, then gets the Queen’s nickname copyrighted? A person that only thinks of herself. Despicable.
Despicable is PRINCE ANDREW, the Queens favourite. The Queen completely turned a blind eye to Andrews offending, even when he was exposed, the no integrity grifter Queen still had ANDREW as her favourite. What a filthy, disgusting family of leaches
@@genevievetaulier2892NO the Queen was NOT honored. She was furious with these two grifters for using a pet name only the Queen's parents, a few close friends and Prince Phillip used to call her. The Queen specifically requested that after Prince Phillip died, that her pet name never be used again by ANYONE. Despicable, disgusting MM did it anyway as a form of revenge against the Queen because she wasn't allowed her own way, once in the family....they have standards, where MM has none!! MM never likes being told no by anyone and she's shown, that she is very vindictive.
Harry pretended to love the Queen, but he has publicly shown that he has no love, care or respect for her, and he’s a liar. Actions speak louder than words.
Finally someone said what nobody reports on and IT is a big part of the whole story and why the Queen was so upset: they registered the domains with the name two days before they announced the name which means they plan to merch it. They didn't just name the kid after the beloved grandmother, they decided to use the fact why this name is most known for and earn the money on that association to the Queen. They really are grifters....
The other part to this story is that this was yet another unauthorised registered Trademark - of Queens moniker on her Official birthday. AFTER Queen very publicly blocked M&H attempt to use "Sussex Royal" just before Duo hasty Xmas departure. The UK 'Royal' Trademark was covertly registered by Duo's staff. On 19th December SAME day Prince Phillip was admitted to hospital for Heart Treatment - H&M coverty switch UK account into their names AND register another Royal Trademark Internationally. Soon after The Guardian expose this story, William throws a fist and H&M expose their step down. Harry Grandmother as Monarch is Head of State and Law. The word Royal and Her Majesty's name is protected by UK Trademark law in 'Her Royal Image'. It is Royal Protocol for Queen to consent before any birth name announcement. And to register a Trademark without Royal assent is a contravention of Her Majesty Law. What a double whammy Birthday Present. And what a cold calculated deed months prior when Queens "strength & stay" husband hospitalised with a terminal illness. The absolute contempt Meghan And Harry have for Queen seems obscene. What an consummate Actor Harry has become with his want to protect his grandmother and make sure she has the “right people around her”.
HMTQ was possibly upset because it didn't seem like a genuine attempt to pay tribute, but more of a grab for headlines to create a narrative, and a money making move. By copyrighting it, she intended to make money out of it
We're supposed to believe the name is a tribute, yet the gruesome twosome wouldn't allow the Queen to have a relationship with her namesake. Literally as each day passes they get more disgusting.
I think it was 'Look how much we love her despite her being a big meanie to us'/'We want to remain in her will!' move. One thing we know for certain...it wasn't done out of love or respect for the Queen.
how come a name can be 'private'?? even my daughter bears the late queen's name. have I also 'stolen' the name from the queen???? a couple of millions in the UK and worldwide bear the queen's name, not just Meghan and Harry who were relatives of the late queen and so as other great-grandchildren that are also named after the queen. if we were all banned from naming our children after the late queen, perhaps she should have chosen to trademark it, which she didn't. The late queen wouldn't mind about such hateful gossips from 'royal experts' and she felt pride when people named their children after her.
They may have taken everything from her in her opinion but they can NEVER take away the love and respect the Queen had and STILL has from her Country's people. 🇬🇧
Exactly . And they have not the intelligence to even see how everyone of their actions has rebounded ,bringing total disgust at the pair of them . Someone please name ONE thing that Harry and Meghan have done that reflects well on themselves and others, there must be something?
Trademarking your Child's name wtf! another "product" to monetise at the whim of a narcissist the longer it goes on the more we understand WHY she was as disliked as she was! all self inflicted! imagine an ego SO BIG you look down on the Queen! having accomplished NONE of her achievements!
Well, M probably thought that by wearing a wedding veil that has embroidery of the flowers of the Commonwealth countries, she's as big as TLQE2 who wore a gown with the flowers during her coronation. That's how narcissists will view it.
That’s why she won’t share pictures of kids , wants to be begged then have a $$$$$ war for highest bidder. She’s a professional grifter … her mommy’s clone . Sick , evil, spiteful and arrogant to the extreme…. One day she’ll burn from the inside out. Those kids are going to be pure evil when they are done twisting their minds . King Charles and parliament need to get those titles gone , they are not of her body and should not be in line of succession….. m is twisted enough to try and do something to Wales family to get the throne .
there really is not a word that can describe the character and moral compass of these two people. Harry was protected by the Queen as her beloved grandson and he should carry a mantle of shame the rest of his life. He has gone willingly to the events that Me-again has contrived ad nauseum.
So true. Archie is Prince George's name. It is like having a deranged person stealing identities. Just boycott me me in everything. Do not buy any brand that is associated with her. Nor watch any show that she is on.
I'm American (51) and have adored Queen Elizabeth since I was a child. The audacity of that woman is appalling and it keeps getting worse. My heart aches for the late great queen. She was as close to perfect as humanly possible, and that spiteful snake 🐍made her final years miserable. To copyright her precious nickname is so revolting and sick. I thought I despised MeGain before, but it's on a whole new level now.
Immediately threatened to sue anyone that said the qween didnt give permission, sending lawyers letter to national newspapers. When the palace refused to back his lies he withdrew them. They deserve everything they get
They do indeed and it will be interesting to see if Duke and Duchess Dumbo sue Robert Hardman. I'm thinking they won't because they were too cowardly to sue Tom Bower and Robert Hardman is a journalist/ writer of a similar calibre. The Montecito Mudslingers are just out and out bullies and like all bullies cowrds to boot
There was nothing poor about the Queen when she died. She herself was overly wealthy and used the Monarchy to garner wealth. In fact with the expectation that their lifestyle would be funded by the tax payers in the UK and other commonwealth nations
@@donna-leeking2211 some people are crazy fanatics 😂they feel pitiness over a super wealthy lady who didn’t want her nickname to be ever used 😂 c”mon people theres kids dying on wars, misery and hunger.
When I heard the name the sussexes gave to their daughter I straight away thought Her Majesty would have been angry,didn’t give permission. I knew that was a special nickname only used by her sister,mother,father & later her husband. The soonest these two lose their titles,the better.
how come a name can be 'private'?? even my daughter bears the late queen's name. have I also 'stolen' the name from the queen???? a couple of millions in the UK and worldwide bear the queen's name, not just Meghan and Harry who were relatives of the late queen and so as other great-grandchildren that are also named after the queen. if we were all banned from naming our children after the late queen, perhaps she should have chosen to trademark it, which she didn't. The late queen wouldn't mind about such hateful gossips from 'royal experts' and she felt pride when people named their children after her. how do you all know that they didn't have 'permission', as if they need one after they quit being working royals? everyone think they know what was in the queen's mind and what was truly going on behind closed doors.
What a sick, scavenger Meghan Markle has proven herself to be. No personal boundaries, entitled, inconsiderate and spiteful. I couldn't imagine a worse choice for a life partner and parent to the resulting children. Quite heartbreaking.
So is Horrid Harry who is her accomplice He is 100% in with this treatment. He is the one who has defamed, lied and bullied his family the worst. No EXCUSE. He bullied his grandmother.
Megalomaniac is pure evil. How on earth was she ever allowed to copyright the Queen's personal nickname. Knew instantly they announced the name that Mega had deliberately did this to cause Her Majesty deep and terrible hurt. Everyone could see from photos that Harry's wife hated the Queen, she hated curtsying to her, she hated that she wasn't allowed to change the way the monarchy functioned, she hated being told "no". She believed and still does that she's the best ever thing that has happened to the world, and everyone needs to worship her and obey her.
At the time she registered it I never would have know it was Queen's nickname. Only after baby was born it was told it was Queen's nic name. megsy pulled a fast one over our heads.
@@missybelmore4631 Exactly, deceitful as ever. Why didnt she say the name on Oprah when she said she was having a girl. I would haved love to hear PP's response. But look thats her game, she deceived the US writing she was caucasian on her documents and she deceived others by going to Malta claiming to search her (imaginery) grandmother and got paid for it. Whatever she does is for monetary gains.
Amazing, just when I thought she could not get any lower she astounds me with this. How utterly disgusting this woman really is. A new personal low, she should be ashamed.
Yes! Why is he still protecting a grown man and his horrible, lying, egomaniac of a wife? I hate them both. It is a strong word, but not strong enough. 😡🤬
@@nicoladavies9812 although connected, NDAs and the report are 2 separate issues. For an internal investigation and report the staff are always guaranteed anonymity and are protected by law. Even if hypothetically some staff would want and/or agree for the report to be released it would be impossible IMO - as it would expose ALL names. You want to expose H nd M but you would have staff exposed to public media and scrutinty. Can you imagine the circus? And least remember the harkles' propoensity for bullying and litigation
I think the palace should intervene now. They do have legal rights and should be exercised. It is Kings duty to his country and he has been far too soft about it. No one can ever replace Queen Elizabeth and this is too awful to hear. It is so unbelievably offensive and an invasion of her personal privacy. They should consider it as appropriation of identity for gain and stop it all right now. You cannot copyright a private name!
disrespect closes doors than can never be re=opened by any apology, and I believe that Harry and Mm have closed many doors, they will never be forgiven.
It's about time legal action was taken. TW has gone too far with her insults, I think it's time that the RF proved that TW's kids belong within the family. This woman is seriously disturbed and the RF should cast this pair out once and for all. The name lilibet is tarnished and people won't buy anything to do with Megain. Utterly disrespectful.
Every single thing they touch is tainted, ruined, disowned, disrespected, misused, and forever soiled. It’s hard not to hate them. Harry, Harry, shame on you, you disappointment of a man.
These stories are 2 + years too late. We all knew about her trademarking her alleged kids names. There are some good investigative ytubers who dug out all this and much more. Glad it's finally hitting the headlines but it won't have the same impact as the desperate duos initial pr bombs. Still think Hawwy was the Queens favourite? Not me, he was always a complete tosser and that thing he married? They are well matched. Two rotten peas in the same pod.
Most of us know this .. when it happened.. but now we know the Queens reaction.. and the heartbreaking words she used.. and now the whole media is reporting this! That’s the difference. People speculated 2 years ago.. not anymore.
@@donnamacleod4488 Mm. Our beloved late Queen, or indeed any elderly lady suffering from the loss of a husband and a horrible painful terminal disease, deserve peace and tranquility. These 2 horrible wretches caused her untold misery and piled on the pressure. In my mind it was elder abuse. They should be in prison for cruelty not lauded by daft rich tv execs for millions to spill make belief lies, sorry, their 'truth'.
I'm absolutely gobsmacked! As if it wasn't disrespectful enough, to take our beloved Queen's nickname from her, to actually copyright it first is absolutely unbelievable and unforgiveable. Madam M is a disgraceful, hateful person. Harry is ... ? ... let's just call him blind.
I was born in England in 1952 and emigrated to the U.S in 1967 but, Elizabeth was still my Queen. When the sad news came that she had passed, I cried like I hadn't since my mother died. I honestly think I cared more about Queen Elizabeth than the Grifters of Sussex ever have.
I wouldn't suggest the Royal family would speed up Meghan's passing, but coming from a mining family, she wouldn't be the first to pass away in a tunnel...
Oh, I would! She killed them both as if she'd held the knife herself! And, I'd suggest she probably literally has to Harry! That boy is scared to death of her, and now we know why he always looks the way he does. He's trapped, and can't escape. Let's just hope we don't hear of his accidental demise or "suicide" before he can get out and get help!
Actually I was mortified and very angry when I saw the carefully cut piece on Megan doing the courtesy however when I watched the series - which obviously a lot of you haven't - it was said by Megan in the context of Britain maintaining its wonderful traditions for so many hundreds of years. Yes, Harry did momentarily look a bit taken aback but of course quickly realized the context in which it was said.
Those two in Montecito how dare they copyright our Late Queens personal special name thats despicable. I love the Kings portrait as Isabel said its fabulous.
Much as we abhor the Markles, and call out their despicable exploits, clinging to a conspiracy theory does not make it the truth. The children exist and you need to accept the fact.
Imagine you're Lilibet and once you're old enough to understand things, you find out that you're great grandma, one of history's most popular monarch, who you were named after, was actually furious that you were named after her. I feel really sorry to Harry and Megs kids, where ever they are.
Hopefully she will understand the evil machinations of her parents so they could monetise their titles and hers. The damage and hurt they caused to a wonderful Monarch in her final years is unforgivable, even stooping so low as to try and trade mark her name. I doubt that child will care as she will be poisoned by her parents.
@@NordieJ As Archie and Lili live in the USA, they will quickly be free to think for themselves and they could rebel against their parents, just like many teenagers do. But they live in a culture where celebrities get away with doing drugs, so their lives ahead of them will not be easy.
What King Charles should do now is to immediately remove the prince & princess titles from Harry & Meghan's children. Queen Margrethe did it and so did King Gustav, and the same rule holds for the Spanish royal house. Those titles only go to the future King/Queen's children. If I remember correctly, the Queen had to give special permission for Andrew's children to carry to be called 'princesses'.
Not sure how a copyright of that name would be approved. I'm sure there are other people in the world who have that name as well. That would be like someone naming their child Mary and then copyrighting the name so no else can name their child Mary.
It is appalling. When they said the late Queen gave her blessing, I was incredulous and àm not surprised that HM was upset. We all knew it was a deeply personal thing. Why not Elizabeth Diana? No, not for them, they even highjacked her name, the loved ones, her immediate family used. Shame on them.
I could've sworn that the Sussexi (plural) had made it to the bottom of the barrel way over a year ago. Wow. Wow. The most cold and conniving people ever.
The idea of copyrighting the late Queen's pet name is truly malevolent. Harry Markle is the ultimate wimp, sacrificing his relationship with the late Queen in order to keep Me-Gain happy...
After the passing of the Queen Mother and Princess Margaret, Prince Phillip was the only one who used the Queen's nickname in their private moments. That is something very special for two people who were married for over seventy years. For anybody to intrude into that delicate, unique, and precious memories is just wicked, wicked, wicked. And the Queen clearly instructed that after Phillip passed, the name Lillibet must never be used in the family circle.
Well, according to one of the fired nannies early on, it seemed she never liked her daughter either. She stated that that witch would never even hold that girl, and recoiled when she was brought near. Speaks volumes about her! And, I for one, believe this story.
@@vallee3140 according to this fired nanny, yes. But, no one has said that she was actually her flesh-and-blood daughter. Don't forget, someone else suggested they hired her for publicity, and others have suggested she was a surrogate. But, there was a baby girl in the house for the very short time this woman was employed. If memory serves me correctly, only for a few shortvweeks.
This just only gives people more reason to hate them but especially her because we all know that Harry has no control in that relationship and is most likely abused by her so more so he isn’t going to do anything for fear of what she will do to him. If she truly cared about winning over the public this isn’t going to help in that cause but instead just show the world who she really is a vindictive narcissist hung up on power, control and revenge which much make for a very miserable life.
Harry has a mean streak--In his book he gleefully recalled how he mocked and made life miserable for a female school teacher with a disability, so I don't think he is that innocent. What someone has done in the past is a good indicator of what they will do in the future. Clyde (H)found his Bonnie(M) and they went on a cruel spree.
That girl is sooo vindictive towards people. I can't see how she could have ANY friends. I'd steer clear of nasty people like that. They're not worth all that drama in life.
Has anyone taken out a copyright on George , Fred or lucy yet ! Sounds like a great earner !! Seriously though ,surely you cannot possibly copyright a given name !!
Trademarks are for business purposes. It's a way to distinguish one's business, product, service, etc. from other entities. The same way no one else can name their business Disney, because Disney owns a current trademark on that particular name. If they were to no longer pay the fees required to keep the trademark, then it would be available for someone else to use. Given names and such cannot be trademarked, so anyone could name their child Lilibet. By trademarking the name, she is setting herself and her daughter up for future business opportunities.
I don’t know - but I did hear that she had registered a domain name of Lilibet-Diana before the birth - this can then be used for merchandising under the brand name Lilibet-Diana, eg lines of clothing, toys or whatever, as a commercial venture. “Tribute to Her Majesty”?! Hardly.
These two grifters will use and abuse the elderly, children, veterans, those who are disabled, and anyone else that they can for their revenge and greed. May karma come swiftly to them 🙏
Even her brother, Thomas Markle Jnr, wrote to Harry saying he would regret the marriage, and wasn't that an insight into the future. Of course, we don't know if H regrets anything except the fact that the money is drying up.......
I think they asked to name the baby after the Queen and she didn’t know it was the Lilibet name until it was announced. Not much she could do then. Very calculating and disrespectful to not only use a family member’s meaningful nickname but also monetize the name.
Trademarking ‘Lilibet’ proves how calculating Meghan is
That proves that it was about money and control. A true narcissist at work.
not only calculating but vindictive to her dark soul
absoutely disgusting. DISGUSTING
Oh i am not allowed to respond but u tube lets death threats go ahead i. E. Trevor and avid gardner????
@@jeanverso3339
Exactly, she is vindictive and so so cruel. Harry is the same.
What Harry has done to his grandmother along with his wife,,, it’s truly disgusting!
😂
Will never forgive Harry for disrespecting the Queen .
They are evil......leave them.....
They’re disgusting and despicable.
Absolutely agree
Monetising the name Lillibet is disgusting, particularly when it was given to the Queen by her parents and sister. When Harry told the Queen, before he married, "what Megan wants, Megan gets" sums this up perfectly.
When have they monetised it? Oh, that's right, they haven't
@@ElledieWildAndFree They registered a domain names 'Lilibet Diana' and Lili Diana before the child was born. What purpose does that serve if you don't intend monetising it? Why don't you try registering the same domain names and see what happens!
Well they potentially can because they have taken out many trademark names and Domain names using the kids names in a variety of orders.@@ElledieWildAndFree
Her father gave her the nickname. Her father, mother, sister and Philip were the only ones allowed to call her that.
@@ElledieWildAndFreesugar
Mayhem Malarkey appropriating the late Queen's nickname 'Lilibet' for Elizabeth is bad manners, to copyright it is despicable.
HG sẽ làm gì đây với “ lilibet “.
M's actions only prove she was in for the money. I guess that makes H feel whimpish!
Mayhem Malarkey - the most fitting name for her.
@@Cernunnos-2024 các ông chủ phương Tây luôn thích thuê lao động trẻ em ở nước ngoài .
Mayhem Malarkey is the mot juste.
Just proves Queen Elizabeth was a good judge of character
like knighting jimmy savile and other prolific nonces, good judge of character my arse
@lilyloving
No choice. Harry is not smart enough to listen to her or their advice.
Megan is so evil. Harry is an idiot.
@lilyloving The NUT was ready to scream racist from the start
Oh sure is that why is let Andrew stay in the fold or why she married a racist
My heart breaks more for the Queen, how much more pain did she carry that we will never know. I’m American but I feel as badly for her as if it was my own grandmother
Absolutely, same here
what a horrible vengeful person it is. She is so spiteful and full of hatred. she is a danger to people. needs locking up.
😂😂😂
I couldn't agree more Sandra. THAT marriage, when it ends ..... will be VERY tragic and life threatening for Harry and I am NOT trying to cover up for him and his behaviour, just concerned and their children.
@@ginnypurdey1There are No children belonging to the Gruesome Twosome. The two children are rented, and live with their own Birth legal Parents.
@@ginnypurdey1 yeah she'll point at him and go, he's of his face on drugs...he's so thick
Exactly
Harry Markle should be ashamed... may his conscience never give him rest
She's a sociopath, soulless entity!
Not sure Harry Markle is capable of feeling shame or having a conscience . Some people lack the capacity to do so.
He is “too honourable” like his uncle Andy. 😂
@@TreatbarHis Uncle Andy is the son of the late Queen. He is the son of Hewitt and it is about time they stop pacifying him.
What conscience? I don’t think he has one!
How is anyone allowed to copyright a name. Does someone have to pay to use the name. Absolutely ridiculous
the late Queen was furious about not giving permission to the Sussex’s for using her nickname,she especially asked everyone not to use it after Prince Phillip died,the Sussex’s lied about getting permission so that shows you how disrespectful they were towards her,the Queen was a great judge of character and spot on calling Meghan Markle an evil person!
It’s even more deplorable that Harry has gone along with all of this. They are not good people.
Oh Meghan is evil because she gave her daughter a name. How dastardly. I mean how does she sleep at night knowing the OAP viewers of GBnews are mad at her
I KNEW IT. Meghan was just GREEDY to steal any and EVERYTHING she could get her hands on.
There was an article in the Daily Mail in 2022 saying Harry wanted to name his daughter Lilibet before he met Meghan, and he had discussed it with her
@@ElledieWildAndFreeit's be cos the press & the DM@!l in particular dine on the tr@!tor h@ter h@rry narrative of lies. They registered trademark of names with some included P+P titles & the domains were found registered before the circus🎪wedding took place. Coincidentally their daughter was born on the date+month of QEll's succession to the throne. Mmm🤔.
QEll did not say 'YES' to L*l*bet - QEll was never asked about using L*l*bet - QEll was saying 'YES' referring to Elizabeth _inline with her other grandaughters & greatgrandaughters_ honouring 'Elizabeth' in part of their names.
Imagine growing up with parents who only sell hate and have given you your name out of spite.
Therapy doesn't even cover it, poor child 😔
Yes, having a narcissistic mother is a lifelong sentence
This is why I hope both Archie and Lili don't exist and that they are rent-a-children and don't live with Harry and Meghan. There were NO newborn photos of Lili at the time she was born, NO Christening photos and NO photos of her with Queen Elizabeth at the Jubilee. Ummm...
The kids are fake don’t worry
What makes it worse is YOU ALL calling ‘the invisible child’ the same name as the Queen. Call her Just Lily….that will do for a child NOT of MM’s body, & not much to do with the R.F.
I'm an American in the USA and there's no LEGAL birth certificate for a Lilibet Diana. Here in America there's a strict law that all births no matter who the parents are must be registered and available for public records.
If she truly copyrighted the name Lillibet. Not only does it prove she’s even more despicable than we thought possible, but proves she did not ask permission from the Queen.
June 22, 2021 The couple confirmed they had purchased the internet domain names before Her Majesty consent. A spokesman for the Sussexes told the Telegraph: “Of course, as is often customary with public figures, a significant number of domains of any potential names that were considered were purchased by their team to protect against the exploitation of the name once it was later chosen and publicly shared.”
1. you can't 'copyright' a name.
2. There is no record of a trademark
3. Registering a domain name with Lillibet in it (if they did that, again there is no website) isn't copyrighting the name. But it does protect them in case someone buys the domain name and turns it into a porn site or something really horrible.) I don't blame them if they did do that, but again the newspapers said they had 'copyrighted' the name, which you can't do. That's bad journalism whichever way you look at it.
@@AL_THOMAS not copyrighted as such, but they have created several Domain names under ‘Lillibet Diana’ and in other forms which are protected from others using them. They did the same with ArchWell.
She indeed didn't ask, as the Queen wanted it never to be used again after her hubby Philip died. She was furious when she found out.
It proves nothing cause there is no proof it's made up to get people angry at meghan. We can't just leave them alone no we have to make up crap we know nothing bout.
Markle is just evil! The queen was spot on!
Don't think Megan Markle is at fault we are at this stage of our Generation who don't care about a lot of this anymore. It's not Entirely her fault.
The Queen was spot on when she forced him to marry Diana instead of Camila? Nah, the Queen wasn’t spot on then.
The Queen was spot on when she made choices that kept her family in one piece. But she could do very little about her heir taking the crown, despite knowing it would have been better suited for the head of her daughter. The Queen made do with the family she had. Unlike this rancid excuse of a king. For shame
MM wanted to give the Queen the middle finger
MM awful person
Disgusting, deceitful, despicable traitors.
What they have done to the late queen and the royal family is disgusting
They have done nothing to the family,&other members have done worse.
I do not even care so much how personal the name was, the point is, these two parents LIED about the Queen's so-called blessing and they also LIED to the Queen about it, like the conman and con-woman they are. In my view there can be NO honour in receiving a name in such a dishonourable contrived way. If I were the young princess, I would change my name one day to something else as soon as I can decide about it autonomously. They have set her up for life as a spectacle by giving her a name under these circumstances. Downright dishonesty; there is nothing royal about that, in my view. What a sad and ill legacy to saddle your child up with. Your child will inevitably know from the press that her name was stolen, that her parents tricked her grandmother into this. What an utter disgrace.
Perfectly said!
Absolutely correct. Spot on .Just feel sorry for the child when she finds out how her parents are using her
If this child exists, with two narcissistic parents and a maternal grandmother who's allegedly the same as her daughter, presumably she'll carry on cashing in.
Not only did they lie about the blessing the Queen had not given but via their lawyers( the same one that was on their Netflix documentary )
aggressively went after the BBC who had reported the Queen had not consented . So they tried to shut down the free press so as to improve their brand . Disgraceful to try and limit accurate reporting by threatening more legal action .
@@sandradavies7804 She may not become a grifter just like her mother, it's hard to tell. And by the time she grows up, William will be King and he will not allow her to cash in on Queen Elizabeth's personal and private nickname.
I felt nothing but sadness when I read the Queen's response to Harry's and Meghan's duplicitous betrayal: she didn't own the palaces or the paintings or the jewels. All that really belonged to her was the intimate childhood nickname used only by her parents, grandparents, sister, niece, nephew, Royal cousins and beloved husband, and the Montecito duo stripped her of that, too. May she rest in peace, and may the Sussexes receive their just desserts for their horrible treatment of their respective families.
Well said !
This made me so infuriated!
The fact she copyrighted the name Lillibet is despicable and shows M's true colours. She plotted and planned to get H and she thought there would be megabucks..... they both deserve to end up with nothing
Yes, boycott everything they support as they do not deserve any from all os us.
the Queen certainly knew how to describe a situation beautifully. This has broken my heart. I hope she's happy with her family up there. She's earnt her peace now !!
Who does MM think she is turning Lilibet into a trademark? It was a private nickname for the late Queen, no matter what Megan and Harry do they can never own the name Lilibet...
how come a name can be 'private'?? even my daughter bears the late queen's name. have I also 'stolen' the name from the queen???? a couple of millions in the UK and worldwide bear the queen's name, not just Meghan and Harry who were relatives of the late queen and so as other great-grandchildren that are also named after the queen. if we were all banned from naming our children after the late queen, perhaps she should have chosen to trademark it, which she didn't. The late queen wouldn't mind about such hateful gossips from 'royal experts' and she felt pride when people named their children after her.
How many people think it was 100% Meghan's idea to use the name Lilibet and Harry just went along with it?
I agree. Harry is just swept along and utterly whipped, his balls in her handbag. She’s despicable and Harry has proven to be utterly spineless. She tells him what he thinks.
That’s what I was saying too! It’s all Meghan
I think most of everything they have done including Spare is all the Markle woman
@@Sun-nq9ipcorrect! He also had all the power to stop meg if he wanted to. However consciously chose not to.
Harry wouldn't have dreamed up such an idea, more likely to have thought up Diana Elizabeth or the other way around. He would also under different circumstances, have made the suggestion to the Queen first to get her opinion before going ahead.
Sorry Angela, he did not love or care about the queen .All he did was to trash her .Horrible and despicable of him
Harry did love his grandmother but didn't have enough dignity nor integrity to not marry a grifter and a call girl. He should have researched Meghan's background and realized she is shallow and self-centered and has no class.
Agree
Yes, I find it hard to believe that he loved his grandmother at all - or perhaps only when she was giving him things... If he'd loved her, he would have visited her when he had the chance.
He’s a disgusting person..and without his titles he is a nobody..he should remember that! The worst is he has no respect, he is an entitled spoilt brat. And no he did not love the Queen his actions have proven otherwise.
He's a spoiled brat who didn't get his way, so he was trying to take down the people who told him "no."
"If I can't get what I want, NOBODY will get what they want, I'll tear the whole place down!"
(He said as much in interviews, when he said that he didn't want "the institution" and that he was doing this on behalf of his father and brother who were "trapped"- justification in his mind for what he was doing.)
People are 100% entitled to choose whatever name they like for their kids. BUT... copyrighting the name is just plain bonkers and lying about having the late Queen's blessing is pretty evil.
How does someone go against the Queen’s direct wishes not to use her personal nickname, then gets the Queen’s nickname copyrighted? A person that only thinks of herself. Despicable.
LA REINE E2 A ETE HONORE QUE HARRY LUI RENDE HOMMAGE EN DONNANT SON SURNOM A SA FILLE ELLE ETAIT HEUREUSE ET D'ACCORD ......
Despicable is PRINCE ANDREW, the Queens favourite.
The Queen completely turned a blind eye to Andrews offending, even when he was exposed, the no integrity grifter Queen still had ANDREW as her favourite.
What a filthy, disgusting family of leaches
@@genevievetaulier2892You have a tick brain.
@@genevievetaulier2892NO the Queen was NOT honored. She was furious with these two grifters for using a pet name only the Queen's parents, a few close friends and Prince Phillip used to call her. The Queen specifically requested that after Prince Phillip died, that her pet name never be used again by ANYONE. Despicable, disgusting MM did it anyway as a form of revenge against the Queen because she wasn't allowed her own way, once in the family....they have standards, where MM has none!! MM never likes being told no by anyone and she's shown, that she is very vindictive.
There was not a photo with Lilibet and the Queen. Photographers were not allowed. @@jeanjacobs809
I feel so sad for the Late Queen her last years was so painful 💔 😢
I feel the same, it's so sad 😢
We hear that Harry is in hospital after trying to top himself.
It's having a paedophile in the family that did it. Also, Lord Mountbatton was a paedophile too
Source? @@haydenbretton2990
She murdered Princess Diana, so who cares. People believe whatever the tv tells them.
Harry pretended to love the Queen, but he has publicly shown that he has no love, care or respect for her, and he’s a liar. Actions speak louder than words.
Finally someone said what nobody reports on and IT is a big part of the whole story and why the Queen was so upset: they registered the domains with the name two days before they announced the name which means they plan to merch it. They didn't just name the kid after the beloved grandmother, they decided to use the fact why this name is most known for and earn the money on that association to the Queen. They really are grifters....
The other part to this story is that this was yet another unauthorised registered Trademark - of Queens moniker on her Official birthday. AFTER Queen very publicly blocked M&H attempt to use "Sussex Royal" just before Duo hasty Xmas departure. The UK 'Royal' Trademark was covertly registered by Duo's staff. On 19th December SAME day Prince Phillip was admitted to hospital for Heart Treatment - H&M coverty switch UK account into their names AND register another Royal Trademark Internationally. Soon after The Guardian expose this story, William throws a fist and H&M expose their step down. Harry Grandmother as Monarch is Head of State and Law. The word Royal and Her Majesty's name is protected by UK Trademark law in 'Her Royal Image'. It is Royal Protocol for Queen to consent before any birth name announcement. And to register a Trademark without Royal assent is a contravention of Her Majesty Law. What a double whammy Birthday Present. And what a cold calculated deed months prior when Queens "strength & stay" husband hospitalised with a terminal illness. The absolute contempt Meghan And Harry have for Queen seems obscene. What an consummate Actor Harry has become with his want to protect his grandmother and make sure she has the “right people around her”.
HMTQ was possibly upset because it didn't seem like a genuine attempt to pay tribute, but more of a grab for headlines to create a narrative, and a money making move. By copyrighting it, she intended to make money out of it
Very well said
Megan is so disgusting and disrespectful she needs locking up 😡
She only married Harry for money so it’s not surprising is it?
Exactly!! Horrid cynical move by Markle because she is undoubtedly behind the one
We're supposed to believe the name is a tribute, yet the gruesome twosome wouldn't allow the Queen to have a relationship with her namesake. Literally as each day passes they get more disgusting.
I’m so sad for what Meg put the Queen through at such a difficult time in her life
Not just MM, Harry is as bad.
I think it was a spiteful response to the Queen not letting them use royal titles for making money.
Exactly. MM couldn't stand the fact the Queen advised them not to use the word royal.
I think it was 'Look how much we love her despite her being a big meanie to us'/'We want to remain in her will!' move. One thing we know for certain...it wasn't done out of love or respect for the Queen.
Spiteful sums them up well.
But, yet they are still using titles ??
@@j.pappas9083 Seriously, how much more hate AND loathing do they have?? 🙄😵😡😠😡😠
Vile is too nice a word to describe the duo
Can she get any more despised by us all. Words can not even come close to describe what she is thought of.
she's working hard at it....stay tuned. All the best to you!! ps love your youtube pic!
who puts a copyright on their child's name? who treats their unborn child as a commodity? is there no depths of much this pair won't stoop to?
Lower than a snakes belly that pair.
So, the woman copyrighted the QUEEN's nickname as her business name? INCREDIBLE!
to benefit of the QUEEN's fame?
how come a name can be 'private'?? even my daughter bears the late queen's name. have I also 'stolen' the name from the queen???? a couple of millions in the UK and worldwide bear the queen's name, not just Meghan and Harry who were relatives of the late queen and so as other great-grandchildren that are also named after the queen. if we were all banned from naming our children after the late queen, perhaps she should have chosen to trademark it, which she didn't. The late queen wouldn't mind about such hateful gossips from 'royal experts' and she felt pride when people named their children after her.
They may have taken everything from her in her opinion but they can NEVER take away the love and respect the Queen had and STILL has from her Country's people. 🇬🇧
Exactly .
And they have not the intelligence to even see how everyone of their actions has rebounded ,bringing total disgust at the pair of them .
Someone please name ONE thing that Harry and Meghan have done that reflects well on themselves and others, there must be something?
Not only the Country’s people, but around the world.❤
😂
This has made me cry, so many people truly loved QEII. We will always love her. ❤❤❤❤
Worldwide. She was respected and loved by many outside of the UK. A true Queen, and there will never be another as great as our Queen Elizabeth.
Trademarking your Child's name wtf!
another "product" to monetise at the whim of a narcissist
the longer it goes on the more we understand WHY she was as disliked as she was!
all self inflicted!
imagine an ego SO BIG you look down on the Queen!
having accomplished NONE of her achievements!
Spot on, well said.👍
Well, M probably thought that by wearing a wedding veil that has embroidery of the flowers of the Commonwealth countries, she's as big as TLQE2 who wore a gown with the flowers during her coronation. That's how narcissists will view it.
That’s why she won’t share pictures of kids , wants to be begged then have a $$$$$ war for highest bidder.
She’s a professional grifter … her mommy’s clone . Sick , evil, spiteful and arrogant to the extreme…. One day she’ll burn from the inside out.
Those kids are going to be pure evil when they are done twisting their minds .
King Charles and parliament need to get those titles gone , they are not of her body and should not be in line of succession….. m is twisted enough to try and do something to Wales family to get the throne .
A name cannot be copyrighted and sued for its misuse.
And stealing Prince George’s name Archie. This is NOT normal behaviour, something so off about Rachel
Psychopathy perhaps?
She is rather typical of kids who grew up in hollyweird among the other narcissistic wannabe "stars".
there really is not a word that can describe the character and moral compass of these two people. Harry was protected by the Queen as her beloved grandson and he should carry a mantle of shame the rest of his life. He has gone willingly to the events that Me-again has contrived ad nauseum.
Dark quadrad @@patscott6365
So true. Archie is Prince George's name. It is like having a deranged person stealing identities. Just boycott me me in everything. Do not buy any brand that is associated with her. Nor watch any show that she is on.
I'm American (51) and have adored Queen Elizabeth since I was a child. The audacity of that woman is appalling and it keeps getting worse. My heart aches for the late great queen. She was as close to perfect as humanly possible, and that spiteful snake 🐍made her final years miserable. To copyright her precious nickname is so revolting and sick. I thought I despised MeGain before, but it's on a whole new level now.
When Lily was born Philip had just died and the late Queen was very ill herself.
And this is how they treated her. It's horrible.
What a despicable, evil piece of garbage!
Haters are so pathetic
@@ElledieWildAndFree Yes, the carparkles are pathetic.
@@ElledieWildAndFree You must be a Sugar. Defending Harry and Meghan who show the world that they do not have any family values or morals.
She proclaimed that the Queen didn't own the word ROYAL.... so, WOW. She was spiteful with Lillibet
Immediately threatened to sue anyone that said the qween didnt give permission, sending lawyers letter to national newspapers.
When the palace refused to back his lies he withdrew them.
They deserve everything they get
Let’s see if the sue the author of this new book. I think they know he can prove they lied so they won’t chance it. They really are contemptible.
They do indeed and it will be interesting to see if Duke and Duchess Dumbo sue Robert Hardman. I'm thinking they won't because they were too cowardly to sue Tom Bower and Robert Hardman is a journalist/ writer of a similar calibre. The Montecito Mudslingers are just out and out bullies and like all bullies cowrds to boot
No, they deserve ten fold what they get
Agree with all of you. And I'm glad this is finally being verified. Some of us have known about this since they did it.
It’s astounding what that woman has done. The poor Queen at the end of her life didn’t deserve that. They will never be forgiven.
No they will not.
As well as giving Prince Philip a hard time for the last months of his life
There was nothing poor about the Queen when she died. She herself was overly wealthy and used the Monarchy to garner wealth. In fact with the expectation that their lifestyle would be funded by the tax payers in the UK and other commonwealth nations
@@donna-leeking2211 some people are crazy fanatics 😂they feel pitiness over a super wealthy lady who didn’t want her nickname to be ever used 😂 c”mon people theres kids dying on wars, misery and hunger.
Doubtful if she gave birth to these children so it's even worse !
When I heard the name the sussexes gave to their daughter I straight away thought Her Majesty would have been angry,didn’t give permission. I knew that was a special nickname only used by her sister,mother,father & later her husband. The soonest these two lose their titles,the better.
how come a name can be 'private'?? even my daughter bears the late queen's name. have I also 'stolen' the name from the queen???? a couple of millions in the UK and worldwide bear the queen's name, not just Meghan and Harry who were relatives of the late queen and so as other great-grandchildren that are also named after the queen. if we were all banned from naming our children after the late queen, perhaps she should have chosen to trademark it, which she didn't. The late queen wouldn't mind about such hateful gossips from 'royal experts' and she felt pride when people named their children after her. how do you all know that they didn't have 'permission', as if they need one after they quit being working royals? everyone think they know what was in the queen's mind and what was truly going on behind closed doors.
What a sick, scavenger Meghan Markle has proven herself to be. No personal boundaries, entitled, inconsiderate and spiteful. I couldn't imagine a worse choice for a life partner and parent to the resulting children. Quite heartbreaking.
Of evil.
So is Horrid Harry who is her accomplice
He is 100% in with this treatment. He is the one who has defamed, lied and bullied his family the worst. No EXCUSE. He bullied his grandmother.
More like a parasite, living off her host (Harry and by extension the RF) to exploit anyway she can. The woman is the embodiment of evil.
She is a typical narcassist
Megalomaniac is pure evil. How on earth was she ever allowed to copyright the Queen's personal nickname.
Knew instantly they announced the name that Mega had deliberately did this to cause Her Majesty deep and terrible hurt. Everyone could see from photos that Harry's wife hated the Queen, she hated curtsying to her, she hated that she wasn't allowed to change the way the monarchy functioned, she hated being told "no".
She believed and still does that she's the best ever thing that has happened to the world, and everyone needs to worship her and obey her.
At the time she registered it I never would have know it was Queen's nickname. Only after baby was born it was told it was Queen's nic name. megsy pulled a fast one over our heads.
@@missybelmore4631 Exactly, deceitful as ever. Why didnt she say the name on Oprah when she said she was having a girl. I would haved love to hear PP's response. But look thats her game, she deceived the US writing she was caucasian on her documents and she deceived others by going to Malta claiming to search her (imaginery) grandmother and got paid for it. Whatever she does is for monetary gains.
she hated even more that the Queen did not abdicate and announce her as the successor
Meghan is very sick emotionally and mentally, disturbed woman! She should be sued for stealing the Queen’s family nickname and had it copyrighted!
Ya right!!
Amazing, just when I thought she could not get any lower she astounds me with this. How utterly disgusting this woman really is. A new personal low, she should be ashamed.
This is just sick! I know that Charles can’t strip Harry of his titles, but they can release the bullying report. He needs to do it!
Yes! Why is he still protecting a grown man and his horrible, lying, egomaniac of a wife? I hate them both. It is a strong word, but not strong enough. 😡🤬
To protect the Staff the report cannot be released.
@@praktyknlpThe staff want to be released from they're NDA's so it can be exposed... Charles needs to release it!!
@@nicoladavies9812 although connected, NDAs and the report are 2 separate issues.
For an internal investigation and report the staff are always guaranteed anonymity and are protected by law. Even if hypothetically some staff would want and/or agree for the report to be released it would be impossible IMO - as it would expose ALL names. You want to expose H nd M but you would have staff exposed to public media and scrutinty. Can you imagine the circus? And least remember the harkles' propoensity for bullying and litigation
What hasn’t she copied? 🙄
Hard work.
Integrity, character, honesty
@@El.Cid17 😁😁😁😁👍
Kindness, empathy!! Didn't know she copyrighted that name. She's trying to be like Beyonce?? Didn't they do that Blue Ivy ??
Princess Catherine.
I think the palace should intervene now. They do have legal rights and should be exercised. It is Kings duty to his country and he has been far too soft about it. No one can ever replace Queen Elizabeth and this is too awful to hear. It is so unbelievably offensive and an invasion of her personal privacy. They should consider it as appropriation of identity for gain and stop it all right now. You cannot copyright a private name!
Don't know how Harry can stand beside MM. Words fail me.
disrespect closes doors than can never be re=opened by any apology, and I believe that Harry and Mm have closed many doors, they will never be forgiven.
Pity the end of that conversation was cut off because Angela revealing something else there
It's about time legal action was taken. TW has gone too far with her insults, I think it's time that the RF proved that TW's kids belong within the family. This woman is seriously disturbed and the RF should cast this pair out once and for all. The name lilibet is tarnished and people won't buy anything to do with Megain. Utterly disrespectful.
Be patient. There is always hope.
The kids are FAKE
Legal action lmao 😂
@@Openyoureyez83 The kids are real but they aren't Meghans.
@@Debbie_YorkieMom no kids the one you see are rented and borrowed and the others are all photoshopped
Every single thing they touch is tainted, ruined, disowned, disrespected, misused, and forever soiled. It’s hard not to hate them. Harry, Harry, shame on you, you disappointment of a man.
I'll second that 👏👏👏👏
Unfortunately the child's name is now soured, and it will be the child who has to endure this legacy.
These stories are 2 + years too late. We all knew about her trademarking her alleged kids names. There are some good investigative ytubers who dug out all this and much more. Glad it's finally hitting the headlines but it won't have the same impact as the desperate duos initial pr bombs. Still think Hawwy was the Queens favourite? Not me, he was always a complete tosser and that thing he married? They are well matched. Two rotten peas in the same pod.
💯👍👍👏👏👏
Здорово сказали про гнилые горошины,браво❤
My comment has been removed
Most of us know this .. when it happened.. but now we know the Queens reaction.. and the heartbreaking words she used.. and now the whole media is reporting this! That’s the difference. People speculated 2 years ago.. not anymore.
@@donnamacleod4488 Mm. Our beloved late Queen, or indeed any elderly lady suffering from the loss of a husband and a horrible painful terminal disease, deserve peace and tranquility. These 2 horrible wretches caused her untold misery and piled on the pressure. In my mind it was elder abuse. They should be in prison for cruelty not lauded by daft rich tv execs for millions to spill make belief lies, sorry, their 'truth'.
I'm absolutely gobsmacked! As if it wasn't disrespectful enough, to take our beloved Queen's nickname from her, to actually copyright it first is absolutely unbelievable and unforgiveable. Madam M is a disgraceful, hateful person. Harry is ... ? ... let's just call him blind.
I would have said "IDIOT" !
I would use another word beginning with B but would get banned 🙊🙊
DID EVERYONE FORGET SHE NEVER HAD A ROYAL PREGNANCY, THE CHILDREN ARE NOT HERS. THE QUEEN KNEW.😮😮
@@susansmiles2242 Could you do b🌀🌀🌀h? Keeping it kind of clean 😁😜?
Trauma bonded would be more accurate
I love Angela Levin's jumper!
This is so sad they put the queen through so much during her final days and broke her heart 😢
No words to qualify the wrongness of the creature’s & husbands actions .No excuses for him please Ms Levine.
I was born in England in 1952 and emigrated to the U.S in 1967 but, Elizabeth was still my Queen. When the sad news came that she had passed, I cried like I hadn't since my mother died. I honestly think I cared more about Queen Elizabeth than the Grifters of Sussex ever have.
I wouldn’t suggest they sped up her passing, our Queen was elderly…. But, they definitely broke her heart enough for it to have been a factor.
I wouldn't suggest the Royal family would speed up Meghan's passing, but coming from a mining family, she wouldn't be the first to pass away in a tunnel...
Oh, I would! She killed them both as if she'd held the knife herself! And, I'd suggest she probably literally has to Harry! That boy is scared to death of her, and now we know why he always looks the way he does. He's trapped, and can't escape. Let's just hope we don't hear of his accidental demise or "suicide" before he can get out and get help!
MM has nooo friends or family ..no wonder 😅😅😅
Absolutely disgusting these two now need to be held accountable for their despicable behaviour
Their greedy behaviours means their daughter will always be linked to this awful mess.
I have no doubt that when Meghan first laid eyes on Prince Harry all she saw was the dollar sign and the sound of the cashier going off
Sussex's make me ill. Someone must stop their little red wagon. Copyrighted the beloved late Queens name...heartbreaking.
I agree…..that curtesy was a mockery of our Queen…….so shameful of M to do this
Why were the Palace so slow to keep up with their conniving? Did nobody expect them to do this? Really?
The revolting call girl😢
It isn’t finished yet I believe there is more to come about the hypocrites wait and see. Judas Harry
The world respected the late queen so much, that nobody with any class would name their child after her, let alone copyright it. Hateful and vile.
"Harry's face was stricken" at the mock curtsy. No, it wasn't, he was smirking!
Correct.
He was laughing not stricken.
Actually I was mortified and very angry when I saw the carefully cut piece on Megan doing the courtesy however when I watched the series - which obviously a lot of you haven't - it was said by Megan in the context of Britain maintaining its wonderful traditions for so many hundreds of years. Yes, Harry did momentarily look a bit taken aback but of course quickly realized the context in which it was said.
He was smirking !!! -Buzzard to the extreme I think...
Sorry I mean Bizarre to the extreme!
Can it be revoked as it was done without the Queen' s permission?
Those two in Montecito how dare they copyright our Late Queens personal special name thats despicable. I love the Kings portrait as Isabel said its fabulous.
What gets me is Markle never had a baby named Lilibet, but she did this on purpose to get back to the Queen because she was so jealous!
The child is called Mary Diana Mountbaten Windsor
@@suedensem8966 they don't have any kids. M had a hysterectomy many years ago.
All I know is, that was no baby she was carrying. The late QE must have known it too allegedly
It was not love that Meghan saw when she met Prince Harry but what can she gain monetarily from her connection with the British Monarchy
What a horrible pair. I am totally disgusted with them.
I'm looking forward to the day when it's revealed there are no children! There's an Archie, somewhere, but there is no "Lilibet."
Yep! There is an Archie..but, through a surrogate only. And, 100% NO Lilibet.
True, why aren't these programes and news outlets bringing this all out, are they scared of the truth.
Much as we abhor the Markles, and call out their despicable exploits, clinging to a conspiracy theory does not make it the truth. The children exist and you need to accept the fact.
@@kaythacker3612 allegedly, there's a media super injunction about the issue. It will expire at some point in time and the truth will come out.
It will all be revealed soon I think. Don’t forget the late QE removed both TOW and the girl from her will before she passed.
Imagine you're Lilibet and once you're old enough to understand things, you find out that you're great grandma, one of history's most popular monarch, who you were named after, was actually furious that you were named after her. I feel really sorry to Harry and Megs kids, where ever they are.
Hopefully she will understand the evil machinations of her parents so they could monetise their titles and hers. The damage and hurt they caused to a wonderful Monarch in her final years is unforgivable, even stooping so low as to try and trade mark her name. I doubt that child will care as she will be poisoned by her parents.
Imagine being old enough to read how vile and awful your parents are😵💫
@@NordieJ As Archie and Lili live in the USA, they will quickly be free to think for themselves and they could rebel against their parents, just like many teenagers do. But they live in a culture where celebrities get away with doing drugs, so their lives ahead of them will not be easy.
You mean the FAKE children?
This would have all died down by the time the child is old enough to understand. Plus the evil mother can lie herself out of it I expect!
Can the Royal Family sue her for not asking first? .. this has to be reversed?.. it just not right.....
Just denounce them.
SHE HASNT HAD ANY CHILDREN FROM HAZBEEN
So the Elizabeth Arden didn't work 🤔🤣🤣
😂😂😂@@El.Cid17
What King Charles should do now is to immediately remove the prince & princess titles from Harry & Meghan's children. Queen Margrethe did it and so did King Gustav, and the same rule holds for the Spanish royal house. Those titles only go to the future King/Queen's children. If I remember correctly, the Queen had to give special permission for Andrew's children to carry to be called 'princesses'.
Not sure how a copyright of that name would be approved. I'm sure there are other people in the world who have that name as well. That would be like someone naming their child Mary and then copyrighting the name so no else can name their child Mary.
It is appalling. When they said the late Queen gave her blessing, I was incredulous and àm not surprised that HM was upset. We all knew it was a deeply personal thing. Why not Elizabeth Diana? No, not for them, they even highjacked her name, the loved ones, her immediate family used. Shame on them.
I could've sworn that the Sussexi (plural) had made it to the bottom of the barrel way over a year ago. Wow. Wow. The most cold and conniving people ever.
Sussexi! 😂😅😂
The idea of copyrighting the late Queen's pet name is truly malevolent.
Harry Markle is the ultimate wimp, sacrificing his relationship with the late Queen in order to keep Me-Gain happy...
They never respect The late Queen.
Well don't think it's that think they tie System is failing to keep update what is going on now. In this Morden world
WELL THAT'S JUST HER WAY SHE DID T LIKE THE FACT THAT THE LATE QWEEN SAID NO TO MADMEG MORE THAN ONCE
Strange 😮..
How can you copyright a name of child that doesn't Exist 🤔🙄.
After the passing of the Queen Mother and Princess Margaret, Prince Phillip was the only one who used the Queen's nickname in their private moments. That is something very special for two people who were married for over seventy years. For anybody to intrude into that delicate, unique, and precious memories is just wicked, wicked, wicked. And the Queen clearly instructed that after Phillip passed, the name Lillibet must never be used in the family circle.
Kind of ironic that despite Smeggy hating our lovely Queen so much, she named her daughter after her...
Well, according to one of the fired nannies early on, it seemed she never liked her daughter either. She stated that that witch would never even hold that girl, and recoiled when she was brought near. Speaks volumes about her! And, I for one, believe this story.
Just to make money.
are you saying somebody has actually seen the child?@@Sirius-ly
@@vallee3140 according to this fired nanny, yes. But, no one has said that she was actually her flesh-and-blood daughter. Don't forget, someone else suggested they hired her for publicity, and others have suggested she was a surrogate. But, there was a baby girl in the house for the very short time this woman was employed. If memory serves me correctly, only for a few shortvweeks.
They did not name their daughter after the Queen Elizabeth ,
Do people really believe that those children even exist?
This just only gives people more reason to hate them but especially her because we all know that Harry has no control in that relationship and is most likely abused by her so more so he isn’t going to do anything for fear of what she will do to him. If she truly cared about winning over the public this isn’t going to help in that cause but instead just show the world who she really is a vindictive narcissist hung up on power, control and revenge which much make for a very miserable life.
She's violent too! Especially, when she doesn't get her way! She also has the foulest mouth.
Harry has a mean streak--In his book he gleefully recalled how he mocked and made life miserable for a female school teacher with a disability, so I don't think he is that innocent. What someone has done in the past is a good indicator of what they will do in the future. Clyde (H)found his Bonnie(M) and they went on a cruel spree.
" what do you mean I cant make money of my royal title!??? Why do think I married the darned fool?!! "
That girl is sooo vindictive towards people. I can't see how she could have ANY friends. I'd steer clear of nasty people like that. They're not worth all that drama in life.
Does "TRADEMARKing" "Lilibet" mean no one else can name their child 'Lilibet' without Meaghan's permission?
IF copyright is owned, the property is intellectual property and cannot be used without payment.
Has anyone taken out a copyright on George , Fred or lucy yet ! Sounds like a great earner !! Seriously though ,surely you cannot possibly copyright a given name !!
Trademarks are for business purposes. It's a way to distinguish one's business, product, service, etc. from other entities. The same way no one else can name their business Disney, because Disney owns a current trademark on that particular name. If they were to no longer pay the fees required to keep the trademark, then it would be available for someone else to use.
Given names and such cannot be trademarked, so anyone could name their child Lilibet. By trademarking the name, she is setting herself and her daughter up for future business opportunities.
I don’t know - but I did hear that she had registered a domain name of Lilibet-Diana before the birth - this can then be used for merchandising under the brand name Lilibet-Diana, eg lines of clothing, toys or whatever, as a commercial venture. “Tribute to Her Majesty”?! Hardly.
MM is calculating & evil ! That name was not hers to take !
Markle trademarked the Queen’s personal nickname. For commercial purposes. Just think on that …..
Why on earth should they have to ask for permission to use that name? The Queen should have been happy that they used it.
These two grifters will use and abuse the elderly, children, veterans, those who are disabled, and anyone else that they can for their revenge and greed. May karma come swiftly to them 🙏
Everyone was warned about Markle when she first attached herself to Harry. Everywhere she was identified as "trash".
Now everyone is sure of it.
Even her brother, Thomas Markle Jnr, wrote to Harry saying he would regret the marriage, and wasn't that an insight into the future. Of course, we don't know if H regrets anything except the fact that the money is drying up.......
Things don’t get much more diabolical than this.
I think they asked to name the baby after the Queen and she didn’t know it was the Lilibet name until it was announced. Not much she could do then. Very calculating and disrespectful to not only use a family member’s meaningful nickname but also monetize the name.