to mr chris larsen a Ripple Labs (Executive Chairman), is it true to have an account on instagram "larsenchrisofficial", because I have been deceived by him, maybe many in this world have been fooled by him
I got bored when he said " impact on the world" jeez, fatuous, pretentious. I never hear that from speakers at Stanford. They talk about the business. Quit saying" change the world" . All that means is socialism and we're getting tired of hearing that drivel. Can you talk about Sales? Oh no. Low class. You'd rather talk about strategy and impact and Change.. Berkeley turns out mid level managers. Ridiculous to mention 'impact'
He is basically saying payments ( transfer of value as he puts it...) is inefficient and therefore should be made efficient. It obviously means value providers and receivers should have a medium of exchange. Today, we have enough liquidity (FX) and transfer protocol (SWIFT). They sure need a tech upgrade ( make it real-time etc), which actually the easier part, compared to the hard part ( onboarding banks, making exchanges etc). Ripple is yet to do the hard part at any scale. Besides, You definitely don't need blockchain for it. haha. People just buy it if you say it with a straight face.
#XRP
xrp,xlm,hbar,xdc,quant,jasmy
Informative.
in a lawsuit now
to mr chris larsen a Ripple Labs (Executive Chairman), is it true to have an account on instagram "larsenchrisofficial", because I have been deceived by him, maybe many in this world have been fooled by him
I got bored when he said " impact on the world" jeez, fatuous, pretentious. I never hear that from speakers at Stanford. They talk about the business. Quit saying" change the world" . All that means is socialism and we're getting tired of hearing that drivel. Can you talk about Sales? Oh no. Low class. You'd rather talk about strategy and impact and Change.. Berkeley turns out mid level managers. Ridiculous to mention 'impact'
He is basically saying payments ( transfer of value as he puts it...) is inefficient and therefore should be made efficient. It obviously means value providers and receivers should have a medium of exchange. Today, we have enough liquidity (FX) and transfer protocol (SWIFT). They sure need a tech upgrade ( make it real-time etc), which actually the easier part, compared to the hard part ( onboarding banks, making exchanges etc). Ripple is yet to do the hard part at any scale. Besides, You definitely don't need blockchain for it. haha. People just buy it if you say it with a straight face.
This is aging bad