Don't Use Excel Filters! Use This Incredible Excel Formula Instead ...

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Are you using filters in Excel?
    👉FREE: YOUR EXCEL CHEATSHEET DOWNLOAD👈
    www.tigerspreadsheetsolutions...
    There is no doubt filters can be useful for data analysis in Excel, and they are often one of the first techniques beginners learn. But, they can be ‘onerous’, to say the least!
    💻DOWNLOAD FILES LINK💻
    tinyurl.com/yrk3h9nv
    What about the excessive number of clicks required to get them working? Clicks to select the dataset, to apply the filter, then to configure whatever criteria might be required. Oh, and to change the criteria too!
    All this left me thinking, ‘There must be a better way …’
    My Excel ‘Secret Weapons’ are tools that few seem to talk about, but that deliver ‘next level’ analytical power. To this day, I still don’t understand why more people don’t use them. Perhaps they are simply not fashionable. I have used them dozens of times on real world projects to help people get the analyses they need ‘at the click of the button’. Time and again I have seen my customers’ jaw drop when they see what is possible …
    What if I told you that one of my ‘Secret Weapons’ allows you to filter data … using an Excel formula? Rather than clicking through the filter menus, we might be able to enter a value in a cell to get the answer we need … and quickly change that cell for a different analysis. Sound good?
    Don’t get me wrong, this formula is not easy to set up. A degree of preparation is required. We have to set up a ‘criteria’ area where we designate the columns by which we want to filter, and the values we want to filter by. And there are other considerations, too.
    👉FREE: YOUR EXCEL CHEATSHEET DOWNLOAD👈
    www.tigerspreadsheetsolutions...
    Perhaps this is why many people give up with DSUM. It takes some precision to set up it up. I point out a few of the pitfalls in the video - column header names must be entered with 100% precision, for example, with a single spelling mistake messing everything up. Oh, Excel!
    So, are you up for the challenge? I take you through it step-by-step in this video, so go ahead, download the file and work along with me.
    Not only will DSUM (and its friends DCOUNT and DAVERAGE) allow you to stop using filters for good, but it might just open up a world of possibilities for your Excel data analyses.
    Let me know how you get on.
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 733

  • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
    @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    🔥WATCH NEXT: Another Powerful Excel Formula:
    th-cam.com/video/O56lIznjYdg/w-d-xo.html

    • @braco0000
      @braco0000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello Tiger... What does "DSUM" stand for?

  • @KingsoTV
    @KingsoTV 3 ปีที่แล้ว +139

    CTRL + SHIFT + L to enable filters, you don’t need to select the whole range either

    • @sportssalam
      @sportssalam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes, usually i am go on that method

    • @aynino
      @aynino 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Yes but if for some reason there are empty rows in your table, the data after won’t be taken into the filters if you don’t select your entire table first.

    • @KingsoTV
      @KingsoTV 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@aynino agreed, if you are using the filtering to cleanse the data

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I like it!

    • @g.j
      @g.j 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What about the shortcut key to remove the table?

  • @SabeerAbdulla
    @SabeerAbdulla 3 ปีที่แล้ว +114

    Ctrl Shift L enables filters in all columns without having to select the column.
    Alt ⬇️ drops the filter menu, pressing E after that takes you directly to the search box.
    Not exactly a replacement though, like with all analytical issues, it depends on the scenario you're testing.

  • @roberth.9558
    @roberth.9558 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for this instructive presentation. I plan to experiment with DSUM instead of filters.

  • @TheOrganizedProfessional
    @TheOrganizedProfessional 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow! That was a great help. Thank you so much, man! You saved a lot of my time

  • @nettejean5912
    @nettejean5912 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I can’t wait to checkout your Excel Cheat sheet. I just found your channel and subscribed. I need to become proficient at work with Excel. Thank you this will be so helpful!

  • @texknitsocks5195
    @texknitsocks5195 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really appreciate your video training which is simple and comprehensible.

  • @maziz6237
    @maziz6237 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Appreciate your patience in explaination. Made it easy.

  • @bryanhendricks3020
    @bryanhendricks3020 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love stumbling across excel cheat sheets, thank you :)

  • @travisestes
    @travisestes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just learned some amazing shortcuts and tricks that I know I will use often. Well earned subscribe my man. Thanks!

  • @coogs9335
    @coogs9335 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Another great prospective, thanks a lot for sharing..enjoy your presentations.

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're welcome, Pete! Thanks and do check out the other videos on the channel.

  • @mikenkk1
    @mikenkk1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    HA! I was expecting something 'new' but this is a blast from the past....I'm happy to see your audience so excited. I've been using DSUM, etc. since before Excel had filters. Before Pivot Tables were in Excel, I used to build pivot tables from 100,000 lines of data using five or six criteria DSUM, DGET, DCOUNT, DMIN, etc.

  • @ayosakmet6570
    @ayosakmet6570 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love this formula! It's like a simplified form of the SUMIFS formula 😊

  • @DaylightRob210
    @DaylightRob210 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Many thanks - another piece of learning for me !

  • @ernahubbard2062
    @ernahubbard2062 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Never knew this formula before, great tool, thanks.

  • @peternganga9371
    @peternganga9371 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow! That's great. Thanks as always.

  • @musamushi1733
    @musamushi1733 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for the video Mr. Chris

  • @geekatari4391
    @geekatari4391 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excel-lent short tutorial! I love Excel!

  • @MarcelousTV
    @MarcelousTV ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just found your channel. Excellent tutorial! Thanks for sharing this Gem! Subbed.

  • @S7udio1381
    @S7udio1381 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm giving up on filters. Cool instructions.

  • @8enable
    @8enable 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Chris, first time viewer, excellent video. Thank you

  • @michaelthomashill
    @michaelthomashill 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love creating userforms and using VBA. I am going to start saving my favorite formulas and this one is pretty cool!!! Thanks a bunch!!

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're very welcome MIke - we cover lots of cool formulae on the channel, enjoy!

    • @nigeltufnel4031
      @nigeltufnel4031 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      VBA is almost never needed. The worksheet is more powerful than most people understand

    • @michaelthomashill
      @michaelthomashill 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nigeltufnel4031 - It has not failed me yet. I am learning typescript too and I love Python...wait, I shouldn't enjoy it ? I am confused by your lack of contribution to my post.

    • @nigeltufnel4031
      @nigeltufnel4031 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@michaelthomashill never said you shouldn't enjoy it. Have fun

  • @TheAuditToolbar
    @TheAuditToolbar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Chris I have been using VBA for years, written some complex automations and everytime I click one of your videos I learn something new. This is great stuff, thank you

  • @johngreen8693
    @johngreen8693 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really useful and some great tips, thanks! I usually use sumif(s) and reference criteria cells so may try a comparison.

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks John - I will put a comparison video together someday, given that many viewers are comparing to SUMIFS. Thanks for the comment!

  • @hassanraza-vb5ss
    @hassanraza-vb5ss 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Incredible technique!!! Thanks alot Sir for sharing this :)

  • @beginho2454
    @beginho2454 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    REALLY AMAZING channel, why I find it so late...
    Thank you.

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Welcome - do you check out the other videos!

    • @beginho2454
      @beginho2454 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TigerSpreadsheetSolutions , sure, i need more time, checking one by one... really useful!!!!
      you are so great!!!!! helps me a lot.
      you are the excel guru!

  • @willyh.r.1216
    @willyh.r.1216 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very helpful, thank u so much.

  • @faizsheikh9442
    @faizsheikh9442 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    DSUM can be really useful... didnt knew about this formula before, thanks for the explanation.

  • @craiggregory3243
    @craiggregory3243 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This looks perfect for my database, got a few ideas how to expand on it. Thank you.
    Will look to re-sub again when time allows!

  • @iaingrant4944
    @iaingrant4944 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just discovered this video / channel. Awesome stuff, thanks!! I might reflect on this and change my view, but my first thought is that VSUM is very similar to Sumifs or an array formula, where you build the search criteria into cells that the formula references to, rather than into the formula itself. Cool stuff though, and I’ll definitely give it a try.

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Iain - yes, it's certainly similar. But, there are many ways to perform this function in Excel. DSUM is my preferred way because of the conciseness of the formula. Others may agree or disagree, try to form your own view over time - good luck!

  • @panksimus
    @panksimus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    After 'Alt+Down Arrow' key, if you press 'E', you reach directly to the search box instead of going down using down arrow key.

  • @FRANKWHITE1996
    @FRANKWHITE1996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a great video! Thanks for sharing!

  • @RuleZ69
    @RuleZ69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks!!! It is very useful!

  • @MrCJsssJr
    @MrCJsssJr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    I’m a kid in a candy store. Keep sharing these please!

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Welcome, Leonardo!

    • @tylerjordan1089
      @tylerjordan1089 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I second this.. if only I could find a video simplified as this to have my order guide spreadsheet automatically update the prices of products at the same time as my venders site online does. For example, I order all food for my restaurant from Reinhart food service. Which is online and I have to log into my account to place orders and or get current prices on every ingredient I have in my inventory. Making me have to update every item manually which with over 500 items is VERY time consuming. However it is worth it seeing soon as I update all my costs per ingredient/item I have it set to automatically update what my cost is per menu item/recipe as well as what my food cost is based on my menu pricing based off of whatever I decide to have my markup set as.

  • @SanithKK
    @SanithKK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video. I liked and subscribed to get more of these in my recommendation

  • @rikmayall1308
    @rikmayall1308 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice one. Great tool that is. Thank you

  • @kashmoney1
    @kashmoney1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome video bro!!!

  • @markboulton954
    @markboulton954 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Interesting. I've used DSUM a few times but never really been too keen with how the criteria are defined and prefer the more interactive method of getting the filter output to match the results cells. I've tended to use =SUBTOTAL(... ,9) to add up what's visible at the time, or alternatively use array formulae in the style of {=SUM(basevalues*(filtervalues=filtercondition))}, where anything that matches produces a multiplicand of 1 and anything that doesn't, a multiplicand of 0, so only basevalues in line with a matching condition on the same row get multipled by 1 and added.

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Mark - thanks for the ideas. My objection to subtotal is that you have to go through the filter menu to make it work. That's time-consuming ...

  • @prakashsrinivasan7840
    @prakashsrinivasan7840 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nice Sir. Thanks a lot

  • @paulEmotionalaudio
    @paulEmotionalaudio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing! Will come again.

  • @sathyanarayanansatagopan9069
    @sathyanarayanansatagopan9069 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir. Please explain how to use standard formula for totalling date-wise debit and credit columns and balance in next line, like cash book in tally.

  • @mikratky
    @mikratky 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Nice explanation, but i am still prefering sumifs, even if with harder syntax. Because i normal want to results for more variants, problem of sdum is the header of criteria, you have to have criteria value directly below the header, you cant tou use one criteria table with more rows... For more variants on one shot you have to use every time new criteria table for each dsum (you cant to have only table of criteria variants)

    • @MatthewMarsett
      @MatthewMarsett 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You should check out using the SUMPRODUCT function for trying to sum when there are numerous criteria. I used to use sumif quite a bit but eventually my "criteria" ran into 5+ "ifs" and SUMPRODUCT just became easier to write.

  • @NewYears1978
    @NewYears1978 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    When you first started, I was like this is stupid..I love filters. But at the end I ate my words. Great video.

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Many thanks, James! Do check out the other videos ...

    • @NewYears1978
      @NewYears1978 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TigerSpreadsheetSolutions I plan to watch them all, they are a bit long winded for me but they are awesome! Glad I found you!

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      James Pyle x2 speed? Good luck!

    • @NewYears1978
      @NewYears1978 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TigerSpreadsheetSolutions Haha maybe so!

  • @rejhanfn439
    @rejhanfn439 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video. Thank you :)

  • @ankishamishra1757
    @ankishamishra1757 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank You!

  • @leedsunitedfan8494
    @leedsunitedfan8494 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks, that made sense

  • @dandan141414
    @dandan141414 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Whoa....I have to let that soak in a for a minute. I have done similar in the past, but it has been a complicated group of "SumIf"s. This looks much better!

  • @marketbeans
    @marketbeans 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Loved it.....👏👏👏🙏👍

  • @temitayoadeyemo5526
    @temitayoadeyemo5526 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow...!
    Enjoyed watching this. I'll use this method going forward.
    Thank you.

  • @SouravBanik90
    @SouravBanik90 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is amazing.

  • @pro_excel
    @pro_excel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    good job!

  • @node547
    @node547 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you!

  • @bigboldbicycle
    @bigboldbicycle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I find Alt, A, T is bit of a handful to press sequentially. Someone showed me Ctrl+Shift+L to do the same thing, no need to get the sequence right, just mash the keys at the same time and it's toggled the filter.
    Also press E once you're in the filter box to get the cursor in the filter text box straight away.

  • @bobabout256
    @bobabout256 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice solution will use it. One observation you were labouring away at filter set up. In windows PC, assuming you have a proper data set, shortcuts ctrl + shift + l (L not case sensitive) for filter handles on the top row or ctrl + t for conversion to a table with automatic filter handles. I know the point is to not filter but some time you need them. 👍

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      'laboured' = best adjective for describing my videos :-) thanks for the tip but I generally avoid Excel tables

  • @AdeKaryadi
    @AdeKaryadi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nice tutorial. good job. thanks

  • @sherwinevangelista230
    @sherwinevangelista230 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is really amazing😳

  • @iduncanw
    @iduncanw 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    More than one way to skin a cat. This seems pretty nifty and would become more useful, the greater the number of different fields in your criteria.
    If you wanted to see all teams side by side, you could create a "helper" column to test if the 1.54 was true and then insert a pivot table to sum up the desired value by team where the helper column is True. Super quick to setup as well.

  • @nossonaber6088
    @nossonaber6088 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Never heard of this. I use a fancy index match array formula to live filter. You can do what your doing with sumifs though.

  • @whitelotus108
    @whitelotus108 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For show / remove filter, go to first heading and type ALT, D, F,F all one after another, not together. Many ways to do one thing.
    When you changed the name and the total changed looked like magic. Need to understand how is it doing calculation and is the order of the content of small 4 cell table important.
    Very powerful formula. Thank you

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Sujal - correctly set up, it does feel like magic. I hope you enjoy this one!

  • @brighnquisitive6217
    @brighnquisitive6217 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Never heard of this! Well done . Subscribed

  • @ForeverMods
    @ForeverMods 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now that's working smarter and not harder :) Thanks for sharing !!👌

  • @9833525861
    @9833525861 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice work

  • @farizhinichi
    @farizhinichi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks, i have been using sumifs for years in which suits perfectly fine until now.

  • @jhgpsimons
    @jhgpsimons 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    "It's so tiring, it takes so long, so many mouse clicks" :) then takes no mouse clicks to set all filtering data. in 1 minute and 3 seconds.
    Then you need, to add fields in cells, setup the formula, be aware that everything is exactly correct. in 5 minutes (without the exra explaination it woudl still be longer and more effort).
    Yes DSUM is powerfull, but dont say its a replacement for faster way of using filters. The one has nothing to do with the other.

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's a replacement for using filters to sum filtered rows, as I explain in the video. Thanks for the comment!

  • @mikes978
    @mikes978 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Crtl+A is a great alternative shortcut to the ctrl+shift+right then ctrl+shift+down that you were using to select the data you want filtered. Also, you don’t have to have the top left most cell selected, it could be any cell within the dataset.
    Another great alternative is ctrl+shift+L to enable filters vs the alt+A then T. This one is minor but it’s a more direct command. You can actually see the difference in speed if you compare the two.

  • @zullyholly
    @zullyholly 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I'd normally use pivot table or subtotal. definitely will try dsum next

  • @Kemarrin
    @Kemarrin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks 👍👍

  • @kashmoney1
    @kashmoney1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You're doing the long way....just right click on the data and filter by selected cell, it auto adds the filters and all....cheers mate

  • @excelemployeeleavetracker1274
    @excelemployeeleavetracker1274 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great Video.. Thank-you. However you should note that the column that you wish to see the Sum (i.e."J" in your example) must be formatted as "Number" else your results will be in error. :)

  • @momzwrite
    @momzwrite 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm this situation I typically use a sumifs formula with reference ("*"&cell&"*") to text contained from my desired cells. This gives me a lot of flexibility in how i use the drag features to build a reference table.
    For example I can pivot out a complicated patient interview, then sum or count mentions of topics that I'm looking for depending on the variables.
    This seems like a similar solution? Can you go over how this formula differs from sumifs?

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's similar but I prefer the shorter formula for one thing. I will do a video on the differences one day ...

  • @DanKnight
    @DanKnight 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    As an Access & Excel Developer, it's interesting to see the DSum() function in Excel. However, I'm curious as to why use it when a SumIF() or SumIFS() can accomplish the same thing?

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It depends on your mindset.
      If your mindset is:
      'I have a tool to do that, I don't need another one'
      You might not get value.
      If you mindset is:
      'I need a range of tools so I can pick the best for the job'
      You'll get value, even if you know SUMIFS
      My experience has driven me towards mindset 2.
      In terms of direct comparison, I prefer the conciseness of DSUM vs. SUMIFS.

    • @sandornyemcsok4168
      @sandornyemcsok4168 ปีที่แล้ว

      The only advantage of DSUM what I can see is that it specifies the criteria header by the content of it thus searches for it automatically. If the column order of the database would change then the formula does not have to be updated, while in case of SUMIF if a column would be placed elsewhere next time then you have to update the formula. It is quite minor advantage for me though as database column order changes are quite rare in my practice, thus I also stick to SUMIF :)

  • @MickeyMatos
    @MickeyMatos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I thought I knew Excel until I started looking for help on TH-cam. Good stuff.

  • @Ib_h7
    @Ib_h7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    CTRL+SHIFT+L to filter and you can be anywhere in the data set
    ALT+DOWN then E to search, and with dates you can go into the year, hit RIGHT to expand..

  • @jasurmusaev7234
    @jasurmusaev7234 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very convinient )))

  • @cindaliang3376
    @cindaliang3376 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    kinda like power pivot, sumx nested with filter, like it, thanks.

  • @normanlumhee
    @normanlumhee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nicely done... new subscriber!

  • @MichaelJamesActually
    @MichaelJamesActually 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @Tiger Spreadsheet Solutions - Thanks for your video! How would you approach using DSUM to sum all but beagles and dachshunds as home breeds? How would you approach using it to sum over only those two breeds? I'm assuming you would have multiple instances of the "Home" column in the criteria range, but thought there may be some way to combine them.

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Michael - the Microsoft resources say that 'OR' logic is possible with DSUM by adding more rows to the criteria table, and adjusting the criteria range to include them. So, you wouldn't need a repeated column header to do that, in theory. I have never got this working consistently, however.
      You can use repeated headers for 'AND' logic.
      You can something like "Text" to exclude certain values.
      Good luck with it!

    • @nigeltufnel4031
      @nigeltufnel4031 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Array formulas or pivot table

  • @mikemellor8972
    @mikemellor8972 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Pretty nifty for What If scenarios. It's a pity that the criteria box trick doesn't work for formulae like filter and sort.

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm not sure Mike - perhaps you could develop this mechanism to something more sophisticated, and incorporate the above functions ...?

  • @taltalfassa
    @taltalfassa 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    First of all I wish to thank you. This example shows a standard "AND" condition filter. But there's also the advanced filter which allow us combining "AND" and "OR" conditions. Is there any function like DSUM in this situation? Or maby the SUMIFS function is the only way?
    Thanks

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have read that DSUM allows OR operations - but I have never got this working personally ...

  • @billt2403
    @billt2403 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That’s great. How would you use wildcards in the criteria?

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you - various options are possible, check out Microsoft's learning resources on this formula

  • @martphilippepangandian6568
    @martphilippepangandian6568 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I use Numbers’ Categories in Mac/iPad, instead of Excel, for files the heavily use Filter. Much much better.

  • @sandraying5990
    @sandraying5990 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you, great video! What if there are multiple criteria under HOME?

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Sandra - I would say check out Microsoft's resources on this formula, I understand this is possible but I have never got it working consistently myself. Good luck!

    • @robertharris9769
      @robertharris9769 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can use a nested SUMIFS formula:
      =SUM(SUMIFS($T$11:$T$711,$C$11:$C$771,{"Beagle","Poodle"},$J$11:$J$771,">1.54")).
      If you select a cell within your data range CTRL+A will select the current region, CTRL+T turns it into a table (in my example I named it MyTbl)
      =SUM(SUMIFS(MyTbl[Return Home Wins],MyTbl[Home],{"beagle","poodle"},MyTbl[1],">1.54")).
      2 issues with DSUM:
      1) DSUM doesn't recognize tables correctly
      2) According to Microsoft from Excel 2007 you should avoid using DFUNCTIONS and use their counterparts SUM/COUNT/AVERAGE(IFS)
      Link docs.microsoft.com/en-us/office/vba/excel/concepts/excel-performance/excel-tips-for-optimizing-performance-obstructions

  • @TheKothariamit
    @TheKothariamit 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Woww never heard anyone talking about this , forget about using..
    ❤️❤️

  • @L3gionnaire
    @L3gionnaire 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I can see the power of this but the problem showed could have been solved by a sumifs statement. The question I have which is better in terms of processing speed. I know that the columns being interrogated can be changed easily but you can do this with dynamic ranges and use of indirect. I can see this being really beneficial in VBA though

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great question - I do plan a follow-up video, I would like to know about efficiency vs. SUMIFS too. Watch this space!

  • @mikee.5158
    @mikee.5158 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Because the only time you use filters is when you want to sum certain rows 🤔 (and in those cases you could use SUMIF).

  • @johnerwinkilongkilong8399
    @johnerwinkilongkilong8399 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, Chris! I was wondering if there's a way to automate an excel file that will allow me to ploy training classes for a bpo company?

  • @mesa8615
    @mesa8615 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Omg... i just know it. This was a year ago... so much helpfull this formula.

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  ปีที่แล้ว

      Great to hear - I find it to be the most useful Excel formula for data analysis ...

  • @jasongardner8302
    @jasongardner8302 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This could be handy. Is there a way to apply multiple values for a given criteria? Also, if you format your dataset and criteria as a table, you can reference something like this:
    =DSUM(tblResultsData[#All],tblResultsData[[#Headers],[Returns Home Win]],tblFilterCriteria[#All])
    This reference style makes the formula a bit more dynamic and less error prone, as you can leverage the auto-complete functionality that comes with tables.

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jason - the Microsoft resources say that 'OR' logic is possible with DSUM by adding more rows to the criteria table, and adjusting the criteria range to include them. So, you wouldn't need a repeated column header to do that, in theory. I have never got this working consistently, however. Great that it also works with the table notation though I personally try to avoid tables. I use INDIRECT or similar to dynamically define the data range.

    • @jasongardner8302
      @jasongardner8302 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TigerSpreadsheetSolutions Yes, that does work. It is a little nuanced though in that, if one of the rows in the criteria table is null, it will sum the entire table's results. I suspect there's a logical reason in the documentation, I'll need to take a look. But, the formula does work and the criteria auto expands with the table, which is nice. You just have to be mindful not to have a blank row. Out of curiosity, why do you avoid tables?

  • @karimredouane2150
    @karimredouane2150 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great!

  • @tylerjordan1089
    @tylerjordan1089 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In my workbook I've been working on I use it to double as an inventory guide as well as an order guide. To get total $ on hand broken down between liquor, beer, and soda I use very similar formula which is a sumif. It is =SUMIF(Sheet1!$k$4:$k363,"beer",Sheet1!$J$4:$j$363) then a cell for liquor and Pepsi as well. Can you tell me the difference between sumif and dsum?

  • @jwf3148
    @jwf3148 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    For small jobs, Filter. For large jobs, VBA. For a time-killer while waiting patiently for a phone call, or an email, or a pizza delivery, DSUM. Makes sense to me. But that's just me. And I'm the guy that has to work with me, every day.

    • @benoitkinziki3916
      @benoitkinziki3916 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why do use VBA for large jobs? I thought it was less efficient than excel formulas

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would say VBA and formulae do different things - formulae for data analysis and modelling, and VBA for automating processes

  • @kevint7649
    @kevint7649 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice. I work on large files and I see a lot of possibilities opening up.

  • @RobertDenes_
    @RobertDenes_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Use Ctr + Shift + L for filter on / off on selected areas, where the top row is your header.

  • @OurNewestMember
    @OurNewestMember 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I usually do SUMIFS or INDEX-MATCH... that way I can view multiple filter sets at the same time (derive each filter set as its own column next to the existing data), and then alt+e+v if I do want to view (filter data) just one filter value at a time.
    I don't like adding rows or repurposing columns (at the top of the worksheet) just for filtering (especially when you'd need to add multiple columns up top to add multiple filters on a single source column...sloppy and inflexible)
    ..but for a straightforward "worksheet UI" this method is perfect!

    • @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions
      @TigerSpreadsheetSolutions  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good stuff - you could put the DSUM formula on a different sheet and build a 'Dashboard' there

  • @jgbalboa
    @jgbalboa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Well, I used to use DSUM a lot in the 90's, but then when SUMIFs came up, I realized it was much more simplified with the SUMIF's. You can still use the variables as criteria like this: ">"&1.54

    • @mesa8615
      @mesa8615 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This is the simplest formula. I've it. This is the best than dsum.

    • @josemarquez133
      @josemarquez133 ปีที่แล้ว

      make sure it's ">1.54"

  • @mohamedadjal8502
    @mohamedadjal8502 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, Professor, you have provide in a lot of effort for these videos, thank you, I have a question if we have for example in cell "a1" the number 10.00 m, how to have this number with the same format in cell "b1 "using the text function or some other function, thank you very much.😃👍

  • @PaulStargasm
    @PaulStargasm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When navigating down the autofilter options you can just press E to go straight to the text box to type in your filter.

  • @Nirmala987
    @Nirmala987 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi I need one on one connect on one of my requirements in Excel form creation and backend database to run reports

  • @renas412
    @renas412 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Harika ❤️

  • @randotuber
    @randotuber 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Have you tried advanced filter? That usually works faster and neater than DSUM or filters.