Interesting Fact: Mentmore Towers, the location where Kubrick filmed the ritual, and the Chateau de Ferriéres, where Polanski filmed practically the same subject, were two estates belonging to the Rothschild family. Also, in the Chateau de Ferrières, in 1972, Guy de Rothschild, held famous masked surrealist ball that seems to have inspired Kubrick for the filming of the masked party in Eyes Wide Shut.
Buddy, with all do respect. Kubrick studied subliminal messages, cryptics, semiotics, and symbolism. He did speak through code. All of his films have consistent occult themes if you attribute any meaning to symbols in a film made by a guy who was obsessed with them. This video is such a huge L that it borders on parody. People who come to certain conclusions regarding Kubricks films don't believe we are special, we just believe we have caught on to something that has taken generations for most film fans to catch on to only because we are blessed with the internet. The way you dismiss the theory of the secret society being a devil worshipping cult is as if you are controlled opposition. You're definitely in the algorithm for a reason.
Well, "buddy," with all DUE respect, you offer no evidence. You claim Kubrick was obsessed with codes and symbols, but that doesn't mean he littered his films with them, and that doesn't mean that, even if he had, they supported these particular claims. I'd ask for actual supporting evidence, but I've encountered responses like this on my own channel enough to know that if evidence isn't provided in the initial post, it never will be.
Yeah, Kubrick wanted to ruin the elegance of his films with clunky conspiracy theories and dead-end nonsense.... Some people need to get a better hobby than trying to attach themselves to profound people's lives in such nonsensical ways. It's a bizarre parasocial relationship, which ironically Kubrick no doubt would've put in his work had he somehow lived into the present. - Don't confuse pareidolia for prophesy. Spend enough time staring into at the wall, you'll start to see faces...
@aristotlewasnotafanofplato3661 I think taking another person's work out of context, especially without concrete evidence, is a childish fool's errand. Kubrick's life is well documented, even by his own hand, as his background is in photojournalism. As I pointed out in another comment, had he wanted to put codes in his films, it'd be greater than "rocket sweater = fake moon landing". You people need to go outside and "touch grass", because you aren't nearly as creative as he was. End of story.
@aristotlewasnotafanofplato3661 This whole video is discussing theories concerning Kubrick's work, which is why OP commented in the first place. If you're going to talk about projection, you should use it correctly first. The topic of "conspiracy theories" were inferred, and as I pointed out in another comment: had Kubrick wanted to put secret codes in his films, they'd be more complex and hidden than "rocket sweater = fake moon landing". It's pretty obvious what his films are about, as the symbols and themes all work perfectly together. What's the Conspiracy Theory for AI? Kubrick was warning us that robots were going to become too lovable? LOL.
I agree in general but I don't see a problrm with speculation Alice might have been involved. Nick Nightingqle almost certainly was. I don't believe Kubrick would use such crazy and unlikely coincidences or allow such lazy writing. When Nick said "The mask slipped off" (yeah, right) that to me was when he let the mask slip. One thing that always fascinated me about the party was the couple on the balcony. They seemed to know Bill even through his mask. But who were they?
I don't think a Kubrick film has to be some kind of series of hidden messages to uncover a vast government conspiracy in order to be just a good film. It's no secret there are creepy elitists in secret societies where there are orgies and sex rituals, and a variety of symbols have been associated with these groups and devil worship and such. Even if you don't believe in the devil, the people doing this wacko stuff still exist. I never thought of EWS as trying to expose them; the story is about the protagonist getting involved with them. Just as we know corrupt cops exist, doesn't mean a movie about a run-in with a corrupt cop is trying to expose this fact.
Kubrick was an Artist not a politician that gives press conferences, he makes art. Through art he can comunicate, and why not? This was a theme that interest him. I dont understand why we all dumb for believing theres something more that the original plot .
You have clip on YT, "Clockwork Orange" - Alex at the Korova Milk-Bar", and you can see Kubrick literally wrote on the wall "Moloko drencrom" (moloko means milk in Ukrainian, or Russian) - but no one talked about it for decades, only marginally after Epstein's death. So for me it's hard to imagine that Kubrick would put such clues in his movies for general public, and for any good purpose, to save anything, or anyone.
That’s taken directly from the book, so it’s not some genius 4D chess move on Kubrick’s part. Most of these conspiracy theories involve things taken from the books Kubrick was adapting. He wasn’t a genius, just a meticulous artist creating films of his favorite novels.
@@IAteFire That's true. If you watch CPFs video on The Shining, a lot of the "secret clues" from Kubrick were in the book. Ditto for Eyes Wide Shut and Traumnovelle.
I analyzed Eyes Wide Shut as a guest on the film podcast Crooked Table ( now Close Watch) back in 2019 during the films 20th anniversary. Thus as someone who has formally dissected EWS, it's nice to see a rational, reasoned, practical, common sense look at the kooky, loopy and sometimes spooky theories surrounding this film. It's unfortunate that people use EWS as a template upon which to write their macabre maniacal fantasies but such are the risks I f the internet when it comes to films
"Eyes Wide Shut" is a male-centered horror-fantasy about infidelity, masculinity, isolation and the male identity within the "American Dream", which is why Tom & Nicole were chosen. It's why it's Christmas, etc. At the time, Cruise & Kidman were considered the "Ideal American Couple", which is why they were cast together (for the time, and still now, this is almost unheard of). Kubrick was using our real life attachments to images like those created using Tom & Nicole, or Christmas, and turning them on their head for the purpose of deconstruction. This film, which is shot like a dreamy, romantic wonderland, is actually a nightmarish hell-scape created within the mind of a man with an ego as large, as it is fragile. The secret society, much like the gang of angry young men, are there to symbolically castrate Bill and impose a more domineering, ambiguous force over his perceived self-importance. In essence, Kubrick was addressing Toxic Masculinity the way Fight Club did (which, incidentally came out the same year). I know that will probably bother male viewers, but it's so obvious. The entire self-flatulating narrative is kicked off by the Ideal Man's Ideal wife telling him of a intimate fantasy she has about being unfaithful to him... - Any allusions or symbols extrapolated are strictly tied to those core themes. Kubrick was eccentric, but he wasn't a conspiracy theorist. He was a highly rational, methodical man who wanted to try to understand humanity through his work, as he always took a photojournalistic approach to it. He was a genius, and if he had wanted to put secret codes in his work, it'd be more complex than "rocket sweater = fake moon landing". I mean c'mon people!
Ive read a million different takes on EWS and I think yours might be the best yet as far as capturing the theme. Well said, modern ideas of what it means to be a man, yeah thats as succinct as I could put it when describing the movie. I dont see it as toxic masculinity though Id describe as classic or conventional masculinity. I think toxic is reading into it a bit much, thats perhaps how you see it. Bill sees challenge after challenge to what is classically defined as masculine. Whether you think thats toxic is up to you, I do not.
@@sole__doubt Kubrick's last films "Eyes Wide Shut" and "A.I.: Artificial Intelligence" were created at the very end of his life. He wanted to talk about two important topics to him: His own personal identity (a human man) and his fear of death / being a parent. Essentially, they are an ode to the very complex relationship he had with his wife and children. I think in a lot of ways, it was him explaining himself to them. Throughout Bill & Alice's apartment you can see Christiane Kubrick's artwork showcased exclusively, as the house represents familial safety. Kubrick, like Bill, was a man who "made his way in the world", but in the process neglected his duties as a husband, and to a certain extent as a father. In my opinion, both films are his most personal works, which is why "Eyes Wide Shut" took 15 months to shoot, and why Stanley ended up asking his long time friend Spielberg to finish AI (as he just didn't think he could do the story justice, the way Steven could). That being said, as a perennial loner / outsider, Kubrick was always trying to understand humans, so that he could understand himself (or be understood), so in away, all his films are deeply personal.
...except those who worked on this movie with him acknowledged he was trying to distantiate himself from his jewish heritage (a bit like Marx did, in a sense), nothing wrong with this.
@aristotlewasnotafanofplato3661 "Kubrick frequently removed references to the Jewishness of characters in the novels he adapted. In Eyes Wide Shut, Frederic Raphael, who is Jewish, wanted to keep the Jewish background of the protagonists, but Kubrick disagreed and removed details that would identify characters as Jewish. Kubrick determined Bill should be a "Harrison Ford-ish goy" and created the surname of Harford as an allusion to the actor. In the film, Bill is taunted with homophobic slurs. In the novella, the taunters are members of an anti-Semitic college fraternity." Sources: Cocks, Geoffrey (2004). The Wolf at the Door: Stanley Kubrick, History, & the Holocaust. Peter Lang. Raphael, Frederic (2000). Eyes Wide Open. A Memoir of Stanley Kubrick and Eyes Wide Shut. - Get a new hobby, your fan fiction is terrible. And no, your Straw Man arguments are yet again wrong. I didn't say it was about Christmas. I said it was about deconstruction. You know, your profile name does a disservice to those great minds of philosophy.
You caught the waiter from the party who followed Helena at the final toystore clip with Helena, but but not the two old men who lead Helena out and also were at the party? Just a masively statistical probability at the same time Kubrisk shows extraordinarily unusual sloppiness and lack of attention to detail. No way that, and all the other symbolism, was on purpose. EWS just got stuck with lighting 8 times in a row, and theres nothing to see here folks. Keep it moving. A movie calling out sexual exploitation during the hay days of Epstein and Weinstein and who else knows, another coincidence!!!!
If you mean Jay Weidner, that guy is a straight-up liar. He claimed that the Overlook hotel had no room 217 in order to push some lame-brained theory about an alternate reason for the room number change. The hotel very much says otherwise. He claims the carpet in the Overlook looks like Launchpad 39A at Cape Canaveral. Anyone with Google image search can see otherwise. People like that count on the laziness of people who just want to believe.
Tom Cruise does a great job with such a ridiculous script! I found nothing mysterious in this film, only the willful mystification of a gullible audience, which is one of the hackneyed devices of Modernist anti-art. The film says less than nothing about men and women. You could learn more from an episode of 'Happy Days'. The audience is duped into thinking its getting high art, when its merely getting glorified trash. Is it not ironic that the last word uttered (by Kidman), in the last film of Kubrick is an expletive - that says it all. Kubrick may be a master of technique, but not of storytelling. Kubrick's films are designed to draw attention to themselves, rather than communicate anything of value to their audiences.
That hiding in plain sight Shining video is one of the stupidest videos ever made on the Shining,he obliterated jack shit,a lot of straw-maning,just because some people have far-fetched theories doesn't mean that the Shining can just be reduced to a film about Ghosts and that's it,very shallow.
very lazy. the red cloak taps twice on the red floor, sidney polak's character taps twice on the red pool table (it's him). where the rainbow ends? well.. infra-red. where the rainbow visibly ends there's infra-red, it's hidden from the eye but it's there.
Weinstein and his brother were two of the top producers working with Warner Brothers at the time, that’s really all that needs to be said about this lazy video.
I like Eyes Wide Shut, but after watching it a few times several things started getting on my nerves. Most off-putting is the backward liturgy in the castle, the first time or two watching the film that music bestowed a creepiness of the scene as intended. Anytime Cruise is interacting with any female (except Mandy & the coffee shop girl) is fast forward time. The high point of EWS for me is the costume shop scene (part one) when Boris the Blade steals the movie from every actor who has the misfortune of sharing the frame with him. Rade is usually cast as a villain you can't help but like because his superlative comic timing is second to none.
Kubrick had alternating moments of brilliance and insanity .. what he produces does NOT have to make sense or have a hidden theme.. and looking for one is as futile as him trying to produce one remember clockwork orange,, mental illness on display HIS like eastwood outlaw josie wales great movie but he did the great white hunter too which should have been burned before release or play misty for me JUNK
I think some are more convincing than others. I think EWS definitely discusses some so-called "conspiratorial" subject matter that do exist and occur in reality, but I also don't think doing so was the central thematic point of the film either. I don't know whether or not Kubrick was murdered. I could buy it either way (especially when literal heart attack guns are declassified weapons the CIA has been reported using for longer than I've been alive; yes, that's real), but I also think that evidence of missing footage from the film depicting human sacrifice and further victimization of children doesn't reach above the level of pure speculation. Besides, it's already somewhat implied that the prostitute could have been killed, so actually showing it would rob the story of nuance and questions better left for the audience to interpret for themselves. I don't think it's black and white, and while it's "fun" or at least interesting to speculate about, that's about all anyone can do. Anyone claiming to "know" is full of themselves.
typical self-referential childish boasting.the semi-autobiographical journey,from bill,to red cloak(and with what genius i masked it) look at me daddy/control group.your ego allows you to think they make this stuff for you...they make it for eachother...
Don't forget that this is the same Kubrick who faked the moon landing in exchange for used camera parts he could've just bought. If anyone ELSE had the financial and physical resources of NASA and multiple branches of the government at their disposal, they would've asked for a government position, a state-of-the-art movie studio, or at least enough money to do a film about Napoleon. Not Kubrick. No, sir! He demanded used camera parts. What a goof! 😸
@@hammeredout8146 I don't need to demonstrate anything to you, people denying 2+2's have a superficial approach to art fruition, that's it. Debunking _some_ conspiracy theories doesn't mean that every one is unfounded, denying the rainbow lens' presence in EWS and even Kubrick's deliberate choice of locations, props and names is disrespectful towards him and his confirmed OCD (in good and in bad)
Jeffrey Epstein and Eyes Wide Shut Movie!!! (1999) th-cam.com/video/twWt37Y-UhA/w-d-xo.html Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell featuring from the beggining of the scene till Alice goes to the toilet!!! Way toooooooo coincidential ain't it!!!
Interesting Fact:
Mentmore Towers, the location where Kubrick filmed the ritual, and the Chateau de Ferriéres, where Polanski filmed practically the same subject, were two estates belonging to the Rothschild family.
Also, in the Chateau de Ferrières, in 1972, Guy de Rothschild, held famous masked surrealist ball that seems to have inspired Kubrick for the filming of the masked party in Eyes Wide Shut.
Didn’t the Rothchilds not won Mentmore? Baron liked it and that was the inspiration for the Chateau de Ferriéres.
Buddy, with all do respect. Kubrick studied subliminal messages, cryptics, semiotics, and symbolism. He did speak through code. All of his films have consistent occult themes if you attribute any meaning to symbols in a film made by a guy who was obsessed with them. This video is such a huge L that it borders on parody.
People who come to certain conclusions regarding Kubricks films don't believe we are special, we just believe we have caught on to something that has taken generations for most film fans to catch on to only because we are blessed with the internet.
The way you dismiss the theory of the secret society being a devil worshipping cult is as if you are controlled opposition. You're definitely in the algorithm for a reason.
Well, "buddy," with all DUE respect, you offer no evidence. You claim Kubrick was obsessed with codes and symbols, but that doesn't mean he littered his films with them, and that doesn't mean that, even if he had, they supported these particular claims. I'd ask for actual supporting evidence, but I've encountered responses like this on my own channel enough to know that if evidence isn't provided in the initial post, it never will be.
Yeah, Kubrick wanted to ruin the elegance of his films with clunky conspiracy theories and dead-end nonsense.... Some people need to get a better hobby than trying to attach themselves to profound people's lives in such nonsensical ways. It's a bizarre parasocial relationship, which ironically Kubrick no doubt would've put in his work had he somehow lived into the present.
- Don't confuse pareidolia for prophesy. Spend enough time staring into at the wall, you'll start to see faces...
@aristotlewasnotafanofplato3661 I think taking another person's work out of context, especially without concrete evidence, is a childish fool's errand. Kubrick's life is well documented, even by his own hand, as his background is in photojournalism. As I pointed out in another comment, had he wanted to put codes in his films, it'd be greater than "rocket sweater = fake moon landing". You people need to go outside and "touch grass", because you aren't nearly as creative as he was. End of story.
@aristotlewasnotafanofplato3661 This whole video is discussing theories concerning Kubrick's work, which is why OP commented in the first place. If you're going to talk about projection, you should use it correctly first. The topic of "conspiracy theories" were inferred, and as I pointed out in another comment: had Kubrick wanted to put secret codes in his films, they'd be more complex and hidden than "rocket sweater = fake moon landing". It's pretty obvious what his films are about, as the symbols and themes all work perfectly together.
What's the Conspiracy Theory for AI? Kubrick was warning us that robots were going to become too lovable? LOL.
@aristotlewasnotafanofplato3661 Ooh, the big conspiracy to hide your "cogent arguments". Did Kubrick come up with that one?
Believing conspiracies are not real is as dumb as believing everything is a conspiracy.
I don't think it's a stretch to think that the people who pepper their "art" with satanic symbols may be into some bad things.
March 7th 1999 - January 1st 2001 = 666 days.
💀
How did you come to that conclusion?
@Kayla-kd8ov by having a brain, using my imagination, wondering if google has a date calculator, and then finding out
@@credoratat3272 are you always this rude and sarcastic?
@Kayla-kd8ov I'm usually much worse. You can always count the days between to come at the same conclusion or you can cheat and use a calculator
I’m not saying Ermey was right or wrong, I’m just saying everyone who has discredited him on record has a pretty good self-serving reason to do so.
"Was she the woman at the party? You called it a sharade."
Ziegler called The House a sharade, not The Party.
Nice video but I completely disagree with it. If you know about the deep inner workings of Hollywood, this film makes more sense.
But nobody knows about the deep inner workings of Hollywood that hasn’t been involved in them
When you see a three letter word above their daughter's bed, you won't be able to breathe
I agree in general but I don't see a problrm with speculation Alice might have been involved. Nick Nightingqle almost certainly was. I don't believe Kubrick would use such crazy and unlikely coincidences or allow such lazy writing.
When Nick said "The mask slipped off" (yeah, right) that to me was when he let the mask slip.
One thing that always fascinated me about the party was the couple on the balcony. They seemed to know Bill even through his mask. But who were they?
With regard to Michael Herr, he didn't write the source material for Full Metal Jacket. Gustav Hasford's book The Short-Timers was the source
Oh, shoot. I meant to say that Herr wrote the screenplay, but it sounds like I'm saying he wrote the novel. We'll put a correction up.
I don't think a Kubrick film has to be some kind of series of hidden messages to uncover a vast government conspiracy in order to be just a good film. It's no secret there are creepy elitists in secret societies where there are orgies and sex rituals, and a variety of symbols have been associated with these groups and devil worship and such. Even if you don't believe in the devil, the people doing this wacko stuff still exist. I never thought of EWS as trying to expose them; the story is about the protagonist getting involved with them. Just as we know corrupt cops exist, doesn't mean a movie about a run-in with a corrupt cop is trying to expose this fact.
Very well said.
Thanks for the vid
If anything, I think the lens flare is another rainbow
Word up. I think you're probably right, or and so is Kubrick. Guy was too SMART to not make this movie a reveal piece.
Kubrick was an Artist not a politician that gives press conferences, he makes art. Through art he can comunicate, and why not? This was a theme that interest him. I dont understand why we all dumb for believing theres something more that the original plot .
You have clip on YT, "Clockwork Orange" - Alex at the Korova Milk-Bar", and you can see Kubrick literally wrote on the wall "Moloko drencrom" (moloko means milk in Ukrainian, or Russian) - but no one talked about it for decades, only marginally after Epstein's death. So for me it's hard to imagine that Kubrick would put such clues in his movies for general public, and for any good purpose, to save anything, or anyone.
"drencrom" like adrenochrome? Wow, I'm amazed the lunatic brigade hasn't picked up on that.
That’s taken directly from the book, so it’s not some genius 4D chess move on Kubrick’s part. Most of these conspiracy theories involve things taken from the books Kubrick was adapting. He wasn’t a genius, just a meticulous artist creating films of his favorite novels.
@@IAteFire That's true. If you watch CPFs video on The Shining, a lot of the "secret clues" from Kubrick were in the book. Ditto for Eyes Wide Shut and Traumnovelle.
ADRENOCHROME!!!
@@hammeredout8146I’ve seen it mentioned
I analyzed Eyes Wide Shut as a guest on the film podcast Crooked Table ( now Close Watch) back in 2019 during the films 20th anniversary.
Thus as someone who has formally dissected EWS, it's nice to see a rational, reasoned, practical, common sense look at the kooky, loopy and sometimes spooky theories surrounding this film.
It's unfortunate that people use EWS as a template upon which to write their macabre maniacal fantasies but such are the risks I f the internet when it comes to films
"Eyes Wide Shut" is a male-centered horror-fantasy about infidelity, masculinity, isolation and the male identity within the "American Dream", which is why Tom & Nicole were chosen. It's why it's Christmas, etc. At the time, Cruise & Kidman were considered the "Ideal American Couple", which is why they were cast together (for the time, and still now, this is almost unheard of). Kubrick was using our real life attachments to images like those created using Tom & Nicole, or Christmas, and turning them on their head for the purpose of deconstruction. This film, which is shot like a dreamy, romantic wonderland, is actually a nightmarish hell-scape created within the mind of a man with an ego as large, as it is fragile. The secret society, much like the gang of angry young men, are there to symbolically castrate Bill and impose a more domineering, ambiguous force over his perceived self-importance. In essence, Kubrick was addressing Toxic Masculinity the way Fight Club did (which, incidentally came out the same year). I know that will probably bother male viewers, but it's so obvious. The entire self-flatulating narrative is kicked off by the Ideal Man's Ideal wife telling him of a intimate fantasy she has about being unfaithful to him...
- Any allusions or symbols extrapolated are strictly tied to those core themes. Kubrick was eccentric, but he wasn't a conspiracy theorist. He was a highly rational, methodical man who wanted to try to understand humanity through his work, as he always took a photojournalistic approach to it. He was a genius, and if he had wanted to put secret codes in his work, it'd be more complex than "rocket sweater = fake moon landing". I mean c'mon people!
Ive read a million different takes on EWS and I think yours might be the best yet as far as capturing the theme. Well said, modern ideas of what it means to be a man, yeah thats as succinct as I could put it when describing the movie. I dont see it as toxic masculinity though Id describe as classic or conventional masculinity. I think toxic is reading into it a bit much, thats perhaps how you see it. Bill sees challenge after challenge to what is classically defined as masculine. Whether you think thats toxic is up to you, I do not.
@@sole__doubt Kubrick's last films "Eyes Wide Shut" and "A.I.: Artificial Intelligence" were created at the very end of his life. He wanted to talk about two important topics to him: His own personal identity (a human man) and his fear of death / being a parent. Essentially, they are an ode to the very complex relationship he had with his wife and children. I think in a lot of ways, it was him explaining himself to them. Throughout Bill & Alice's apartment you can see Christiane Kubrick's artwork showcased exclusively, as the house represents familial safety. Kubrick, like Bill, was a man who "made his way in the world", but in the process neglected his duties as a husband, and to a certain extent as a father. In my opinion, both films are his most personal works, which is why "Eyes Wide Shut" took 15 months to shoot, and why Stanley ended up asking his long time friend Spielberg to finish AI (as he just didn't think he could do the story justice, the way Steven could). That being said, as a perennial loner / outsider, Kubrick was always trying to understand humans, so that he could understand himself (or be understood), so in away, all his films are deeply personal.
...except those who worked on this movie with him acknowledged he was trying to distantiate himself from his jewish heritage (a bit like Marx did, in a sense), nothing wrong with this.
@aristotlewasnotafanofplato3661 notice Ishtar's star, rather, on top of those christmas trees
@aristotlewasnotafanofplato3661 "Kubrick frequently removed references to the Jewishness of characters in the novels he adapted. In Eyes Wide Shut, Frederic Raphael, who is Jewish, wanted to keep the Jewish background of the protagonists, but Kubrick disagreed and removed details that would identify characters as Jewish. Kubrick determined Bill should be a "Harrison Ford-ish goy" and created the surname of Harford as an allusion to the actor. In the film, Bill is taunted with homophobic slurs. In the novella, the taunters are members of an anti-Semitic college fraternity."
Sources:
Cocks, Geoffrey (2004). The Wolf at the Door: Stanley Kubrick, History, & the Holocaust. Peter Lang.
Raphael, Frederic (2000). Eyes Wide Open. A Memoir of Stanley Kubrick and Eyes Wide Shut.
- Get a new hobby, your fan fiction is terrible. And no, your Straw Man arguments are yet again wrong. I didn't say it was about Christmas. I said it was about deconstruction. You know, your profile name does a disservice to those great minds of philosophy.
Aren't the evil people running the world from Slytherin House?
ITS CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING!
Where the rainbow ends=pot of gold=the super wealthy
PLEASE do Late night with the devil. there are so many hidden messages/symbols in that movie.
Hey I love you channel ❤❤
You caught the waiter from the party who followed Helena at the final toystore clip with Helena, but but not the two old men who lead Helena out and also were at the party?
Just a masively statistical probability at the same time Kubrisk shows extraordinarily unusual sloppiness and lack of attention to detail.
No way that, and all the other symbolism, was on purpose.
EWS just got stuck with lighting 8 times in a row, and theres nothing to see here folks. Keep it moving.
A movie calling out sexual exploitation during the hay days of Epstein and Weinstein and who else knows, another coincidence!!!!
Nahhhh more ppl have said that abt the film.
Dude i'm digging what you are saying. Please stop slowing down your video speed. We, the audience, can tell.
Was he in " The club".? And he talked out of school, And died just as was cut . #1 #2 #3 # 4 for sure
Wilcock is silly man...
O wow u did a classic
Ermey came down with Death
Jay Winder is a better source
@Stang2023 Are you the youtube police?
If you mean Jay Weidner, that guy is a straight-up liar. He claimed that the Overlook hotel had no room 217 in order to push some lame-brained theory about an alternate reason for the room number change. The hotel very much says otherwise. He claims the carpet in the Overlook looks like Launchpad 39A at Cape Canaveral. Anyone with Google image search can see otherwise. People like that count on the laziness of people who just want to believe.
@@Corn_Pone_Flicks "Crazy Guy A is a better source than Crazy Guy B."
Will you eventually do an analysis on the other theories you mentioned?
Tom Cruise does a great job with such a ridiculous script! I found nothing mysterious in this film, only the willful mystification of a gullible audience, which is one of the hackneyed devices of Modernist anti-art. The film says less than nothing about men and women. You could learn more from an episode of 'Happy Days'. The audience is duped into thinking its getting high art, when its merely getting glorified trash. Is it not ironic that the last word uttered (by Kidman), in the last film of Kubrick is an expletive - that says it all. Kubrick may be a master of technique, but not of storytelling. Kubrick's films are designed to draw attention to themselves, rather than communicate anything of value to their audiences.
That hiding in plain sight Shining video is one of the stupidest videos ever made on the Shining,he obliterated jack shit,a lot of straw-maning,just because some people have far-fetched theories doesn't mean that the Shining can just be reduced to a film about Ghosts and that's it,very shallow.
Exactly what straw-manning did I do? Examples?
I don't think anyone ever suggested it was "just about ghosts," just that ghosts were definitely involved.
very lazy. the red cloak taps twice on the red floor, sidney polak's character taps twice on the red pool table (it's him). where the rainbow ends? well.. infra-red. where the rainbow visibly ends there's infra-red, it's hidden from the eye but it's there.
What's the significance of infra-red?
Where The Rainbow Ends is also the name of a 1911 British Christmas play by Clifford Mills.
This is the worst eyes wide shut video i have ever seen. Dont waste your time.
It’s already too long as a movie. I really doubt there was an additional 20 minutes.
Movies were long back then not like your tiktok brain movies now
Free masonry
Weinstein and his brother were two of the top producers working with Warner Brothers at the time, that’s really all that needs to be said about this lazy video.
I like Eyes Wide Shut, but after watching it a few times several things started getting on my nerves. Most off-putting is the backward liturgy in the castle, the first time or two watching the film that music bestowed a creepiness of the scene as intended. Anytime Cruise is interacting with any female (except Mandy & the coffee shop girl) is fast forward time. The high point of EWS for me is the costume shop scene (part one) when Boris the Blade steals the movie from every actor who has the misfortune of sharing the frame with him. Rade is usually cast as a villain you can't help but like because his superlative comic timing is second to none.
The idea behind satanism is to take what good and holy, and reverse it... thus why the reversed pentagram is a ubiquitous symbol of their practice
Terrible video . Don't focus on wilcock
Who should we focus on?
You are a pretty insightful guy.
FİDELİO!!!
Lies...
Kubrick had alternating moments of brilliance and insanity .. what he produces does NOT have to make sense or have a hidden theme.. and looking for one is as futile as him trying to produce one remember clockwork orange,, mental illness on display HIS like eastwood outlaw josie wales great movie but he did the great white hunter too which should have been burned before release or play misty for me JUNK
I love a good conspiracy theory but the ones about the cabal and Kubrick never convinced me.
"Was she the woman at the party? You called it a sharade."
Ziegler called The House a sharade, not The Party.
I think some are more convincing than others. I think EWS definitely discusses some so-called "conspiratorial" subject matter that do exist and occur in reality, but I also don't think doing so was the central thematic point of the film either. I don't know whether or not Kubrick was murdered. I could buy it either way (especially when literal heart attack guns are declassified weapons the CIA has been reported using for longer than I've been alive; yes, that's real), but I also think that evidence of missing footage from the film depicting human sacrifice and further victimization of children doesn't reach above the level of pure speculation. Besides, it's already somewhat implied that the prostitute could have been killed, so actually showing it would rob the story of nuance and questions better left for the audience to interpret for themselves. I don't think it's black and white, and while it's "fun" or at least interesting to speculate about, that's about all anyone can do. Anyone claiming to "know" is full of themselves.
“Think is hard”
Lol just wow. It must be nice being so naive
typical self-referential childish boasting.the semi-autobiographical journey,from bill,to red cloak(and with what genius i masked it) look at me daddy/control group.your ego allows you to think they make this stuff for you...they make it for eachother...
You’re right
Don't forget that this is the same Kubrick who faked the moon landing in exchange for used camera parts he could've just bought.
If anyone ELSE had the financial and physical resources of NASA and multiple branches of the government at their disposal, they would've asked for a government position, a state-of-the-art movie studio, or at least enough money to do a film about Napoleon.
Not Kubrick. No, sir! He demanded used camera parts.
What a goof! 😸
If he faked it, if would've looked real:-p
@@runarvollan wayyyyyy too much logic for all these mouth breathing shills posing as, "dEbUnKuRz" to understand
You're just lazy, dude
Yes, you have demonstrated how tireless and driven you are with a four word comment.
@@hammeredout8146 I don't need to demonstrate anything to you, people denying 2+2's have a superficial approach to art fruition, that's it.
Debunking _some_ conspiracy theories doesn't mean that every one is unfounded, denying the rainbow lens' presence in EWS and even Kubrick's deliberate choice of locations, props and names is disrespectful towards him and his confirmed OCD (in good and in bad)
Jeffrey Epstein and Eyes Wide Shut Movie!!! (1999)
th-cam.com/video/twWt37Y-UhA/w-d-xo.html
Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell featuring from the beggining of the scene till Alice goes to the toilet!!!
Way toooooooo coincidential ain't it!!!
Worship if you will.