@@henriklmao If the earth is flat, how does it have enough depth for it to have gravity? SEE? If the earth was flat, and like you flat earthers say, quote on quote "Gravity isn't real," how does the earth spin on its axis to do an entire day? And as I can already predict, you flat earthers would debate that the sun is a small star behind the clouds, if that's the case, how does it light up half of the world?!?! YOU ARE SO DUMB!! And as I can already predict again, you flat earthers will have another stupid comeback saying "WeLL, WhY iS ThE HoRiZoN FlaT?" BECAUSE DUMBASS, we are simply too small to even SEE the CURVE.
Hi, I am a Jet engineer.* The service ceiling is the maximum usable altitude of an aircraft. Specifically, it is the density altitude at which flying in a clean configuration, at the best rate of climb airspeed for that altitude and with all engines operating and producing maximum continuous power, will produce a given rate of climb (a typical value might be 100 ft/min climb (0.51 m/s),[1] or on the order of 500 ft/min (2.54 m/s) climb for jet aircraft). The one engine inoperative (OEI) service ceiling of a twin-engine, fixed-wing aircraft is the density altitude at which flying in a clean configuration, at the best rate of climb airspeed for that altitude with one engine producing maximum continuous power and the other engine shut down and feathered, will produce a given rate of climb (usually 50 ft/min; 0.25 m/s).[2] However, some performance charts will define the service ceiling as the pressure altitude at which the aircraft will have the capability of climbing at 50 ft/min (0.25 m/s) with one propeller feathered. Most commercial jetliners have a service (or certificated) ceiling of about 42,000 ft (13 km; 8.0 mi)[citation needed] and some business jets about 51,000 ft (16 km; 9.7 mi).[3] Before its retirement, the Concorde Supersonic transport (SST) routinely flew at 60,000 ft (18 km; 11 mi). Absolute ceiling The absolute ceiling is the highest altitude at which an aircraft can sustain level flight. Due to the thin air at higher altitudes, much higher true airspeed is required to generate sufficient lift on the wings. The absolute ceiling is, therefore, the altitude at which the engines are operating at maximum thrust, yet only generate enough lift to match the weight of the aircraft. Hence, the aircraft will not have any excess capacity to climb further. At the absolute ceiling, the aircraft can no longer accelerate, since any acceleration will lead to higher airspeed and therefore excess lift. Stated technically, it is the altitude where the maximum sustained (with no decreasing airspeed) rate of climb is zero. Compared to service ceiling, the absolute ceiling of commercial aircraft is much higher than for standard operational purposes-in Concorde's case, it was tested to 68,000 ft (21,000 m)-it is impossible to reach for most (because of the vertical speed asymptotically approaching zero) without afterburners or other devices temporarily increasing thrust. Another factor that makes it impossible for some aircraft to reach their absolute ceiling, even with temporary increases in thrust, is the aircraft reaching the "coffin corner." Flight at the absolute ceiling is also not economically advantageous due to the low indicated airspeed which can be sustained: although the true airspeed (TAS) at an altitude is typically greater than indicated airspeed (IAS), the difference is not enough to compensate for the fact that IAS at which minimum drag is achieved is usually low, so a flight at an absolute ceiling altitude results in a low TAS as well, and therefore in a high fuel burn rate per distance travelled. The absolute ceiling varies with the air temperature and, overall, the aircraft weight (usually calculated at MTOW).[1] A zoom climb is a climb where the rate of climb is greater than the maximum climb rate using only the thrust of the aircraft's engines. The additional climb rate is attained by a reduction of horizontal speed. Before a zoom climb, the aircraft accelerates to a high airspeed at an altitude at which it can operate in sustained level flight. The pilot then pulls steeply upward, trading the kinetic energy of forwarding motion for altitude. The aircraft gains potential energy (altitude) at the expense of kinetic energy (forward motion). This is different from a steady climb, where the increase in potential energy comes from mechanical work done by the engines, rather than from the aircraft's kinetic energy. Lockheed NF-104A, 56-0756, zoom climbing with rocket power Zoom climbs are somewhat commonly performed by modern fighter aircraft. Typically referred to as an "unrestricted climb", pilots will take off and accelerate to a high speed near the ground and then pull the aircraft vertically or nearly vertical in order to quickly climb up to the aircraft's cruising altitude. In a demonstration of their performance, English Electric Lightning fighter aircraft have sometimes used zoom climbs to climb above a Lockheed U-2 (which cruises at an altitude above the Lightning's service ceiling), before pouncing on it from above.[1] Zoom climbs have been used to test new aircraft designs and conduct research in different flight regimes.[2] During the proving phase of the McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II, on December 6, 1959, an early version of the aircraft (the XF4H-1) performed a zoom climb to 98,557 feet (30,040 m) as part of Operation "Top Flight". The previous record of 94,658 feet (28,852 m) was set by a Soviet Sukhoi T-43-1 prototype. Commander Lawrence E. Flint Jr. accelerated his aircraft to Mach 2.5 at 47,000 feet (14,330 m) and climbed to 90,000 feet (27,430 m) at a 45-degree angle. He then shut down the engines and glided to the peak altitude. As the aircraft fell through 70,000 feet (21,300 m), Flint restarted the engines and resumed normal flight. An NF-104A Starfighter fitted with an additional rocket engine was also regularly used in zoom-climb research for future spaceflight. On May 7, 1958, the aircraft reached an altitude of 91,249 feet (27.81 km) in a zoom climb at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., setting a new altitude record. The Mach 2 mission took the aeroplane so high that the standard F-104's jet engine routinely exceeded its temperature limit and had to be shut down. Sometimes the engine simply flamed out for lack of air. Then the pilot steered the aircraft like a returning spaceship to a lower altitude, where he would restart the engine. It was on one such "zoom climb" flight that test pilot Chuck Yeager was nearly killed flying a heavily modified F-104 on December 10, 1963.[3] On 25 July 1973, A. Fedotov reached 35,230 m (115,600 feet) in a Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25 with 1,000 kg payload and 36,240 m (118,900 feet) with no load (an absolute world record).[4][5] In the thin air, the engines flamed out and the aircraft coasted in a ballistic trajectory by inertia alone. At the apex, the Indicated airspeed (IAS) had dropped to 75 km/h. Without engine power, the cockpit would depressurize on these missions. Consequently, for protection against the rarified atmosphere, the pilot wore a full-body pressure suit. Properly outfitted with an airtight helmet and suit, the pilot received breathing oxygen without ill effects. FUN FACT..................................Wikipedia............................. *Note-I don't know anything about Jet engineering!!
Swiss001 your probably not reading this but I really like your channel I’ve been subscribed to your channel for 2 years now and there’s more to come Keep buttering those vids Love Matt
I once managed to go to to around 600,000 in FSX and my plane was not responding at all. Also, the entire earth was visible in one picture and it was beautiful.
Title: Flying 747 to the space
Swiss: Let’s just use Cessna Citation jet because it flies higher
747: Am I a joke to you?
@Eduardo Gamer haha thank you!
H@h@
Damn, that 747 looks like a Citation longitude
*hmm yes, interesting, that is a beautiful Boeing citation 747*
Griffin Riley Wilkins *how to fuck do you have subs?*
@@apollo_emad5209 he has over 150k more subs than views
@Boeing 747 your username is Boeing 747
its a 747 on my screen
Him: its so cold in space
His PC: *I DONT THINK SO*
Lol
luap Tadur haha lol
i dont get it, just like starving kids.
AHAHHAA Nice one!
Good one!
Fun fact:He forget to fly 747 into space
Lol yes
You're right.
Yep
Clickbait!!!
⚠️ IT IS MY OPINION PEOPLE, HOW CAN'T YOU UNDERSTAND THAT? ⚠️
That's not even funny. Also fun facts are shit and overused.
I love the Cessna 747! Can’t wait until he flies the Embraer A380 into the sky!
😆
@@alexovercast3359 I don't speak emojis
@@Ikhelturbojhett I don't speak "I don't speak Emojis"
@@rblxmac i don't speak "I don't speak "I don't speak Emojis""
@@niulko9878 I don't speak "I don't speak "I don't speak " I don't emojis""
Nobody:
NASA : let's go to the space with space shuttle
Swiss 001 : let's use 747
Jk , let's use cessna citation
The Boeing 747 is going space shuttle status lmao
Let’s use the space shuttle!
No, the 747!
No the Cessna!
NO THE BLIMP! 💥
Swiss 001 : Hold my yoke !
“Not even the Concorde used to fly at this kind of altitude.”
*sad Concorde noises*
@@RituSharma-wy4wm Yet, SR-71 can fly higher at 90,000 feet
If you wanna fly to space just use a rocket ship
Tim sirimanotham Haha, Yes Falcon 9 and Crew Dragon.
@@haloking8895 I know but Im talking about planes
Concorde gay
Swiss001: Flying the 747 TO SPACE
Also Swiss001: flies Cessna to space
SUPER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
COOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@@norhayatiariffinyatie1688 yes
NOPE!
@@MCninja42 I HAVE LIKE YOU
MCninja42 cool and thanks
UwU
5:32
"Stars in the atmosphere"
And also the earth is flat.
@@henriklmao are you trolling?
@@henriklmao If the earth is flat, how does it have enough depth for it to have gravity? SEE? If the earth was flat, and like you flat earthers say, quote on quote "Gravity isn't real," how does the earth spin on its axis to do an entire day? And as I can already predict, you flat earthers would debate that the sun is a small star behind the clouds, if that's the case, how does it light up half of the world?!?! YOU ARE SO DUMB!! And as I can already predict again, you flat earthers will have another stupid comeback saying "WeLL, WhY iS ThE HoRiZoN FlaT?" BECAUSE DUMBASS, we are simply too small to even SEE the CURVE.
@@kellanfeng why the hell is the horizon flat then?
@@kellanfeng yea bro, I was just trolling there. Its just stupidity if ppl really say that the earth would be flat
2019: Xplane 11
2020: Msfs2020
*2021: Xplane 11 vs Msfs2020 similar videos*
But I like both
Lol
Agree
Hello pls chat to living aviation he missed you
@@nightmar3941 don't worry it's solved
Lol
MFS 2020 literally has the entire world as a map and still takes up less space than COD: MD. Lmao
Tf is cod md?
@@TheAviationGuyID call of duty modern warfare
Yep. Microsoft made a cloud and you can connect to it. And in the cloud there is the map. It's more than a petabyte!
Concorde had a max altitude of 60,000 feet.
I’ve only been on Concorde once… a Bristol Aerospace Museum. 😀
It’s well worth a visit.
Swiss001 : Switched to MSFS 2020
Outro : XPlane
Microsoft : *triggered*
That's just his outro. What? he's not sponsored to do so.
Just let it go. He may make a new outor
r/whoooooosh
747: I'm the biggest so it means I'm the only one can go highest
Cessna: *HOLD MY ENGINES*
Cessna: hold my engines
Also cessna: on nevermind i need those to fly
Did you forget to include the part where you flew the 747 into space? lol
Lol
yes he forgot but still good content lol
Sadly, he did.
@@QF99 pretty much
@@QF99 yes
Swiss at 58,000ft: not even Concorde got this high
Concorde Cruising at 60,000ft: am I a joke to you?
Lol
@Agustinus Reynaldi very true
@Agustinus Reynaldi not passenger planes tho!
Chickbait. Even put a 747 in "space" in the thumbnail but actually used a Cessna Longitude
@Boeing 747 goodbye
Me : TH-cam showing ‘uploaded 2 mins ago’
Went to comment section and saw
‘Commented 8 min ago’
Its because youtube allow to comment before the video even uploaded now in 2021
Title 'Flying The 747 TO SPACE'
Meanwhile swiss001: *flies citation*
I feel betrayed :(
Hi, I am a Jet engineer.*
The service ceiling is the maximum usable altitude of an aircraft. Specifically, it is the density altitude at which flying in a clean configuration, at the best rate of climb airspeed for that altitude and with all engines operating and producing maximum continuous power, will produce a given rate of climb (a typical value might be 100 ft/min climb (0.51 m/s),[1] or on the order of 500 ft/min (2.54 m/s) climb for jet aircraft).
The one engine inoperative (OEI) service ceiling of a twin-engine, fixed-wing aircraft is the density altitude at which flying in a clean configuration, at the best rate of climb airspeed for that altitude with one engine producing maximum continuous power and the other engine shut down and feathered, will produce a given rate of climb (usually 50 ft/min; 0.25 m/s).[2]
However, some performance charts will define the service ceiling as the pressure altitude at which the aircraft will have the capability of climbing at 50 ft/min (0.25 m/s) with one propeller feathered.
Most commercial jetliners have a service (or certificated) ceiling of about 42,000 ft (13 km; 8.0 mi)[citation needed] and some business jets about 51,000 ft (16 km; 9.7 mi).[3] Before its retirement, the Concorde Supersonic transport (SST) routinely flew at 60,000 ft (18 km; 11 mi).
Absolute ceiling
The absolute ceiling is the highest altitude at which an aircraft can sustain level flight. Due to the thin air at higher altitudes, much higher true airspeed is required to generate sufficient lift on the wings. The absolute ceiling is, therefore, the altitude at which the engines are operating at maximum thrust, yet only generate enough lift to match the weight of the aircraft. Hence, the aircraft will not have any excess capacity to climb further. At the absolute ceiling, the aircraft can no longer accelerate, since any acceleration will lead to higher airspeed and therefore excess lift. Stated technically, it is the altitude where the maximum sustained (with no decreasing airspeed) rate of climb is zero.
Compared to service ceiling, the absolute ceiling of commercial aircraft is much higher than for standard operational purposes-in Concorde's case, it was tested to 68,000 ft (21,000 m)-it is impossible to reach for most (because of the vertical speed asymptotically approaching zero) without afterburners or other devices temporarily increasing thrust. Another factor that makes it impossible for some aircraft to reach their absolute ceiling, even with temporary increases in thrust, is the aircraft reaching the "coffin corner." Flight at the absolute ceiling is also not economically advantageous due to the low indicated airspeed which can be sustained: although the true airspeed (TAS) at an altitude is typically greater than indicated airspeed (IAS), the difference is not enough to compensate for the fact that IAS at which minimum drag is achieved is usually low, so a flight at an absolute ceiling altitude results in a low TAS as well, and therefore in a high fuel burn rate per distance travelled. The absolute ceiling varies with the air temperature and, overall, the aircraft weight (usually calculated at MTOW).[1]
A zoom climb is a climb where the rate of climb is greater than the maximum climb rate using only the thrust of the aircraft's engines. The additional climb rate is attained by a reduction of horizontal speed. Before a zoom climb, the aircraft accelerates to a high airspeed at an altitude at which it can operate in sustained level flight. The pilot then pulls steeply upward, trading the kinetic energy of forwarding motion for altitude. The aircraft gains potential energy (altitude) at the expense of kinetic energy (forward motion). This is different from a steady climb, where the increase in potential energy comes from mechanical work done by the engines, rather than from the aircraft's kinetic energy.
Lockheed NF-104A, 56-0756, zoom climbing with rocket power
Zoom climbs are somewhat commonly performed by modern fighter aircraft. Typically referred to as an "unrestricted climb", pilots will take off and accelerate to a high speed near the ground and then pull the aircraft vertically or nearly vertical in order to quickly climb up to the aircraft's cruising altitude.
In a demonstration of their performance, English Electric Lightning fighter aircraft have sometimes used zoom climbs to climb above a Lockheed U-2 (which cruises at an altitude above the Lightning's service ceiling), before pouncing on it from above.[1]
Zoom climbs have been used to test new aircraft designs and conduct research in different flight regimes.[2] During the proving phase of the McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II, on December 6, 1959, an early version of the aircraft (the XF4H-1) performed a zoom climb to 98,557 feet (30,040 m) as part of Operation "Top Flight". The previous record of 94,658 feet (28,852 m) was set by a Soviet Sukhoi T-43-1 prototype. Commander Lawrence E. Flint Jr. accelerated his aircraft to Mach 2.5 at 47,000 feet (14,330 m) and climbed to 90,000 feet (27,430 m) at a 45-degree angle. He then shut down the engines and glided to the peak altitude. As the aircraft fell through 70,000 feet (21,300 m), Flint restarted the engines and resumed normal flight.
An NF-104A Starfighter fitted with an additional rocket engine was also regularly used in zoom-climb research for future spaceflight. On May 7, 1958, the aircraft reached an altitude of 91,249 feet (27.81 km) in a zoom climb at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., setting a new altitude record. The Mach 2 mission took the aeroplane so high that the standard F-104's jet engine routinely exceeded its temperature limit and had to be shut down. Sometimes the engine simply flamed out for lack of air. Then the pilot steered the aircraft like a returning spaceship to a lower altitude, where he would restart the engine.
It was on one such "zoom climb" flight that test pilot Chuck Yeager was nearly killed flying a heavily modified F-104 on December 10, 1963.[3]
On 25 July 1973, A. Fedotov reached 35,230 m (115,600 feet) in a Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25 with 1,000 kg payload and 36,240 m (118,900 feet) with no load (an absolute world record).[4][5] In the thin air, the engines flamed out and the aircraft coasted in a ballistic trajectory by inertia alone. At the apex, the Indicated airspeed (IAS) had dropped to 75 km/h.
Without engine power, the cockpit would depressurize on these missions. Consequently, for protection against the rarified atmosphere, the pilot wore a full-body pressure suit. Properly outfitted with an airtight helmet and suit, the pilot received breathing oxygen without ill effects.
FUN FACT..................................Wikipedia.............................
*Note-I don't know anything about Jet engineering!!
lol
No one:
Swiss001: I have more subs than our current altitude.
"I still have more subscribers than altitude at this moment"
-Swiss001
747 is my favorite one. So light and compact!
Imagine sitting in a plane enjoying the ride and boom, you start to slew at mach 1 to space...
Oh. He just woke up yeah?
Its 4p.m. dude
@@Alex-vs9tw i mean, in korea!!!
@@Alex-vs9tw bruh... what time do you go to sleep?
Not everyone has the same timezone
@@Creeperbreh true obviously
Xplane 11: We are the best flight sim
MFS2020: Allow us to introduce ourselves
Rip Xplane
2016-2020
Rip
AviaX yup and i got explane 1 day before fs2020 got announced
i dont agree actually i think xplane11 is still better and more professional
@@dasf3251 same xplanes physics seem better than mfs2020
@@zxid_15 i dont think its the same and even if so xplane is still better flight sim
All: *playing in Microsoft Flight Sinulator.
Swiss001: *playing in Microsoft Space Sinulator.
2:12 Swiss: Ima do what’s called a pro gamer move.
Swiss001: Flies Cessna citation into space
US government: "Yeah that's why we don't give NASA any money"
Fun fact the people reading this right now haven't watched the whole video
Swiss:Flying a 747 to space
747:Cold, RIP....
Welcome back to another swiss001 video
Title:"Flying The 747 TO SPACE In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020"
Reality : *let's use the Cessna citation longtitude*
Swiss001: flies Cessna citation to 100,000 feet.
Pilots: Did you get your radiation check?
I love how he showed the Boeing 747
Let’s go boys early morning video
When a new simulator comes out
Swiss: Tries every random thing that relates to planes.
I was in a WW1 plane and went faster the mach 50 over a million miles per hour
5:35 actually, concorde was sometimes flying at FL600
So true
He’s tryna break the law of physics
Swiss001 content. Is crazy nowadays
swiss 001 you should fly and land in the bermuda triangle using the icon A5
Bruh that is what TmarTn2 did lol
Area 51
Nobody:
Swiss001: proceeds to fly a 747 to space
747: kill me pls
Well thats the point of the video i can tell your trying to be funny
what i had an opinion
To say you were dropping like a stone is a vast understatement!
😂 lol
Love when you make Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 Videos
3:05 "This is the cool thing about Microsoft Flight Simulator"
Proceeds to present epilepsy warning!
Fun fact: No one cares if you’re first!
Tru
Tru
Tru
Tru
Tru
"In real life the plane would just fall apart at this point"
Emotional wreck of a Cessna: **sobs**
Swiss: 15,000 feet that's crazy.
Me: Nah. That not that crazy you know what im saying? I mean like everything is crazy to you Swiss.
Make a video of visitising the seven wonders of the world in Microsoft flight simulator 2020
**Swiss001 checks realism in game**
Also swiss001 : *Flies 747 in space*
AMN PLAYS u mean realism right
@@ankur27 My bad...thanks
6:44
OOF
R.I.P
I just woke up and I see this
When you are so early that you see the 'TH-cam is drunk' comments
Hi
@Vik Frost hello
Hello
You are first
Hi there
You are first
Swiss001 your probably not reading this but I really like your channel
I’ve been subscribed to your channel for 2 years now and there’s more to come
Keep buttering those vids
Love Matt
It's true swiss is the best
Swiss001
- The guy who breaks even the most realistic Flight Simulators and maybe Reality itself.
R u alright? You uploaded at the morning
I went Switzerland Zürich then murren then Interlaken
Stars in the atmosphere.
Wake up at 4AM to watch new video, lose 6 hours of sleep and video comes out NOW
Fly to your house in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020.
Swiss:Goes to 100000ft
MiG 25: Is that a challenge?
Swiss:Climbs to 200000ft
Swiss:Yes
Swiss:Microsoft flight simulator as always
X-Plane 11: I THOUGHT WHAT WE HAD WAS SPECIAL!!!!!
Get owned flat earthers.
I didn't expect to get clickbaited from you.
It was a good video and didn't needed to be a "747".
Hey Swiss , you've mentioned 747 in the title . Did you forget to record that part ??
lol
I Just watched one of your last Videos and Now Im here
You Are Such A Nice TH-camr
When you have one view and 5 likes
WHAT THE... MICROSOFT THIS GAME IS JEJDNSKED
This was my first swiss001 video I watched!
60k knots just killed me. Granted I am stoned af
O views 96 likes 1 dislike 52 comments
Is youtube drunk??
Huh???
Kevin Easo Mathew indeed
Points Gun At You
*Always Have Been*
Me: Bored
Swiss 2020: Using planes as rockets
Me: NOICE!
EUREKA! EUREKA! EUREKA!!
Swiss001 proves that a Cessna citation= A Boeing 747........
Please give a Polaris Award to Swiss001
We want to fly as "high" as possible
*Flys to space*
Good choice of words
The world's biggest scammer is thumbnail and title of video.
Late you are
Also
Day 3 of telling Swiss to play X-Plane again
We will make X-Plane Great Again
on xplane 12
Yes very nice we have a Cessna Citation-747 flying to 275,000ft.
Who needs a billion dollar space program when you have a cessna citation?
Nobody:
Everybody: *zooms to the comments*
No views, 14 comments that I can’t read and 37 likes TH-cam’s drunk 😵 Xd
Um.......Concorde's cruising altitude is 60,000ft and fun fact, 100,000ft is equivalent to about 30km high
I loved the part where he flied the boeing 747!
I liked before the video started,now i can only do this to my fav youtuber!
Me: Change your outro to Mfs2020
Swiss001: ok
Petition for Swiss001 to land on burj khalifa
Sees plane in space: (KSP INTENSIFIES)
its the perfect time for vids
thanks swiss
Germany: who has buttered a landing everybody does it we need to stop it!?
Swiss: yes
*0% sea*
*0% weed*
*100% pro operation*
*110% boeing 74citation*
Hey guys welcome back to another ssssswish001 video!
Moc hezké video , spousta znalostí ,a i zábavné :)
I love Butter.... Congrats you will get 500k subscribers soon!
Swiss Do a long flight in the 787 JFK to Heatrow
Swiss: “I still have more subscribers than altitude”
Me “You do not gain 6000 subscribers per minute”
CEO of ''Now hey guys''
Do this again in the darkstar.
Swiss001 saying: today we are flying to space in a 747
did i just get clickbaited by SWISS?
I once managed to go to to around 600,000 in FSX and my plane was not responding at all.
Also, the entire earth was visible in one picture and it was beautiful.
Also i forgot to mention, i obviously was using slew mode.