I think that is a little bit of incorrect information about who captured the African slaves... OTHER African tribes captured other Africans and sold them into slavery to the Europeans on the ships most of the time. So the Africans were actually selling themselves into slavery. I think the "expert" needs some more research time.
Your reply is only partially true. The first set of Africans who were captured were in deed captured by other Africans. But once Europeans learned the lay of the land and no longer needed the "middle men", they raided villages and did the capturing themselves. Entire European military operations were carried out against tribes which decimated entire populations of villages and tribes for most of the Slave trade. Also let's not forget, that the first Africans who were human traffickers did not fully understand what they were doing and the intentions of white Europeans. However overtime, Europeans turned against their "middle men" who became captives themselves. Let's aim to understand not to just comment.
@@JulzMcc I did say a little bit incorrect. But mind you if you think that human beings didn't understand that they were selling people for goods to other people.. I think that you are just saying that African people are stupid. Slavery in all its forms has been practiced on every single continent (except antarctica.) of this Earth and I don't think any group of people's or their ancestors were not able to contextualize the actions that they were doing. So I don't doubt that Europeans went and got slaves directly but that also doesn't negate the fact that Africans were also selling Africans into slavery. But from the information that I have read about the subject it was far easier for Africans to be purchased from other Africans by Europeans because it negated the risk of you having to directly raid a community. If you are a business owner.. a very deplorable business owner but a business owner nonetheless.. would you not want to mitigate risk? Of course.
@@JulzMcc Prove it. Also, Africans were being enslaved in 2500 BC, as well as others. Europeans are hardly the only people to practice slavery; why, Arabs have an impressive history. Please buttress your claims about these slaving expeditions by the Europeans; I've never read about any major European slaving campaigns in Africa. Africa has been exporting people since time immemorial, as anyone with a cursory knowledge of African history would know.
Very well done and vital to our education. Humans have done, and continue to do, some awful things to each other and then try to rationalize it or attempt to erase it.
May GOD bless and protect you in the mighty name of JESUS! May GOD and JESUS break every chain the enemy has formed against you and liberate you! May GOD and JESUS fill you with GODliness and love to get through any challenge! GOD IS GOOD! JESUS IS GOOD! GOD is love in times of hate, GOD is strength in times of weakness, GOD is light in times of darkness, GOD is harmony in times of chaos, and GOD is all you need and more! If you need more love/strength/anything GOD is there! GOD LOVES YOU JESUS LOVES YOU! GOD BLESS!
You do realize that slavery was endemic around the world. The Muslims since 600ad dealt in slaves and still do to this day. By records, the slaves brought to this country were slaves sold to the ship owners in Africa.
WOW!!! This is an incredibly one sided view of the Isaac Royalls, their slaves, and their lives! It's unfortunate that people continue to attempt to rewrite history and denigrate those who were a part of it to suit their own particular views.
I was thrilled to see Holly and Tracy together on a video. After a moment of fangirl glee I sobered and was filled with gratefulness for what the two of you do. I was not aware that any place like this existed. Just as with you podcast ep about the Tenement museum you've opened my eyes to another way history is living and breathing all around us. It's so important to be mindful of the fact that America is not an old nation, and these things are not all that far in the past, not in the grand scheme of things. We are still feeling the effects of these events in our society. (Speaking for Americans) Thank you again for all that you do to help broaden the perspectives of people all over the world. The two of you are heroes and role models for me that I put along side Isaac Asimov, Ursula K Lu Guin, and Trevor Noah.
May GOD bless and protect you in the mighty name of JESUS! May GOD and JESUS break every chain the enemy has formed against you and liberate you! May GOD and JESUS fill you with GODliness and love to get through any challenge! GOD IS GOOD! JESUS IS GOOD! GOD is love in times of hate, GOD is strength in times of weakness, GOD is light in times of darkness, GOD is harmony in times of chaos, and GOD is all you need and more! If you need more love/strength/anything GOD is there! GOD LOVES YOU JESUS LOVES YOU! GOD BLESS!
Back begining in the early 1980s and for many years that followed, my Uncle was a the Pres. of the Royall House Asso. and he and my aunt lived upstairs in the slave's quarters. One thing that is not shown would be the shackles on the walls of the basement of the "Slaves Quarters". Ironic he had this job.
Slavery was abolished EARLY in Massachussetts. Much to the credit of the Puritian forefathers, they believed such an institution to be an abomination. However they didn't abolish the trade in slaves via the trans-atlantic trade, the Crown protected the slave trade.
they enslaved human beings for money. a lot of people got tortured and bad things happened..now the rich and the slaves died...each person is now facing the consequences of their action in the other life.
Let’s forget to mention one of the FIRST slave owners. He had an indentured servant, common at the time. The indentured servant finished his time of servitude and asked to be released. The man with whom he had indentured himself denied his release. The man then packed up and left. Some how the “indentured” person as brought back to the village or area and taken to court by the man he had indentured himself to. The man convinced the court that the indentured man had broken his contract. The court ordered the man to be “indentured for life” making the other man one of the first slave owners. This man’s name was Anthony Johnson. A black man. Even in what would become the USA, there were many blacks who owned land, property AND slaves. But this doesn’t fit the narrative of the race baiters and perpetual “victim” ideology.
Check colonial law. An Indentured Servant is not a slave. Slaves (by law) were slaves for life. Indentured Servants were under an Indenture for a fixed amount of time to pay off their fare. My ancestor Job Tyler, a White Englishman, made such an arrangement. A VAST MAJORITY of White Colonists came over as indentures. I honestly do not know of any Africans who came over as Indentures. We do know of escaped slaves who made their way up to Boston and worked on ships and at the warfs. The situation with the black community today is dismal. They got too used to welfare and stopped working, resulting in a narcotics dependency that led to violent crime and the Democrats let that fester rather than offering alternatives which has led to the violent anti-American, Communist BLM.
@@christianfreedom-seeker2025 Maybe a reading comprehension problem. No one said an indentured servant is by definition a “slave”. The man, according to writings in Massachusetts, finished his indentured servitude (note the word INDENTURED). The rest you can re-read. Especially the part about “servitude for life” by court ruling. If THAT’S not slavery then please show me different, not by your words, but references. And not having lived the life of an indentured servant, who can say with 100% certainty their life and living conditions, in some cases, were not neck and neck with conditions a slave lived under. Especially the irish.
What about the Scottish slaves? Scotts were sent to Boston as slaves/indentured servants long before the first Africans were brought to Massachusetts. In fact, the very *first* slaves in Massachusetts were Scotts.
Be that as it may, the Scottish slaves did not endure almost 250 years of it. American slavery against people of African descent is unique in that your condition of servitude was inherited, based only on the color of one's skin and offered no pathway to citizenship even when one could find a loophole to freedom.
@@wayneparke554 lol 😂 Generations of African descendants for 250 years endured slavery. Scotts or any other people of indentures servitude, did not endure it for generations to the tune of 250 years.
Again...show evidence that all Europeons purchased Afrikans and did not force them into servitude...and does purchasing another human being as property make it right...do you purchase slaves?
"A slave purchased on the African coast for the equivalent of 14 English pounds in bartered goods in 1760 could sell for 45 pounds in the American market. A slave's journey to a life of servitude often began in the interior of Africa with his or her capture as a prize of war, as tribute given by a weak tribal state to a more powerful one, or by outright kidnapping by local traders. European slave traders rarely ventured beyond Africa's coastal regions. The African interior was riddled with disease, the natives were often hostile and the land uncharted. The Europeans preferred to stay in the coastal region and have the natives bring the slaves to them." www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/slavetrade.htm I don't have to prove they were all purchased. I just have to prove that the slave market was open. and it would be reasonable to assume the europeans engaged in the slavery described in this video would buy them rather than go on raiding parties into an unknown land with entrenched powers that would resist. It would have cost more for the europeans to do the raiding. purchasing slaves made cents and pounds.
Charles Labedz Here is proof that your innocent ancestors conducted raiding parties... There have been instances of unprincipled captains, who, at the close of what they supposed their last voyage, and when they had no intention of revisiting the coast, have detained, and carried away, free people with them; and left the next ship, that should come from the same port, to risk the consequences. spartacus-educational.com/USASafrica.htm And answer my second question...does it still make it right?
From the same article as your quote; "The merchants obtained the slaves from African chiefs by giving them goods from Europe. At first, these slaves were often the captured soldiers from tribal wars. However, the demand for slaves become so great that raiding parties were organised to obtain young Africans." your quote was an exerpt from; "John Newton was a slave-captain between 1747 and 1754. He wrote in Thoughts upon the African Slave Trade (1787): "The slaves, in general, are bought, and paid for. Sometimes, when goods are lent, or trusted on shore, the trader voluntarily leaves a free person, perhaps his own son, as a hostage, or pawn, for the payment; and, in case or default, the hostage is carried off, and sold; which, however hard upon him, being in consequence of a free stipulation, cannot be deemed unfair. There have been instances of unprincipled captains, who, at the close of what they supposed their last voyage, and when they had no intention of revisiting the coast, have detained, and carried away, free people with them; and left the next ship, that should come from the same port, to risk the consequences. But these actions, I hope, and believe, are not common."" so. why worry about right and wrong? its what happened. what difference does it make? DO i own any guilt for that period of time. NO I DO NOT! did it make sense for the time. yes.
Charles Labedz Thanks for admitting that you're no different than your murderous, savage, devil ancestors and that justifies my anger for you and your people---> "DO i own any guilt for that period of time. NO I DO NOT."
Humm... interesting, from the British perspective the triangular slave trade is typically taught that the Americas as a whole (mostly in the US South and beyond, but not at all barring Northern colonies prior to their local abolitions) were the destinations for slaves who produced natural resources that were processed into industrial goods in the _UK_ instead. Perhaps the US narrative is geared to depict the colonial US as industrially capable, or even to highlight the implementation of slave plantations in the Carribean colonies (as opposed to the continentals). At the end of the day it's probably just some lack of consensus from two different historical perspectives though.
That's my understanding of the subject as well. America was not a very industrialized society and relied heavily on the continent for manufacturing. Looking at many of the tools, weapons, ships, etc of the colonial and early american period show this, as well. It wasn't until around the 1830's and 1840's where America started industrializing at all via "technology transfers" from the Brits ;)
we are all human no matter color or race this is just sad i hate this time of history its just a shame how you can feel your better than someone just because your color or the fact that you had money
We were taught this in school before political correctness , why wasn't it mentioned that people also bought slaves to offer them their freedom or work for them for wages . Also Canada owned slaves at the same time as well.also black have no monopoly on being enslaved.no matter , it was still wrong no matter who the slaves were.
Nexus is correct for the most part! However how is it nobody talks about the Irish that were slaves transported in terrible conditions sold to east India trading company then many here in the very early years.
One should not forget the Irish struggle; but their struggle is not the same for they did not endure almost 250 years of it. American slavery against people of African descent is unique in that your condition of servitude was inherited, based only on the color of one's skin and offered no pathway to citizenship even when one could find a loophole to freedom. The Irish were eventually absorbed into the broader white Euro-American culture and many became oppressors themselves as a way to participate in the larger culture and secure their status in the white social hierarchy.
@@zilog1 If you dont think modern slavery is an issue that is best recognised by knowing and understanding slave history..Yes, there is no point worrying at all. xD
Pretty sure this story is incorrect and is the North American version. Originally the slaves of Boston were Whites from Britain called The Quakers. At this timeline their Masters were Black Native Americans of New England. Royals of Europe decided to change things up by freeing the Quakers and gave them their Masters as slaves. Many Quakers were against slavery and decided to leave for Pennsylvania. That's when the Royals decided to have Black Native Americans shipped from Boston to Algeria (Morocco). They replaced these slaves with Indonesians from Madagascar and sold them advertised as slaves from Guinea in West Africa. Similar to Keneen Ivory Wayans family are Indonesians not Africans. They are Indonesian Blacks (Austronesians/Asiatic People/Semitic People). This did not sit well with Quakers and Harmonites because now the Master and the slaves were one in the same Eurasian People. No slaves from West Africa were ever shipped to North America.
I live just two towns away from here and I never knew! Thank you for this 👍 I hope to visit soon.
I think that is a little bit of incorrect information about who captured the African slaves... OTHER African tribes captured other Africans and sold them into slavery to the Europeans on the ships most of the time. So the Africans were actually selling themselves into slavery. I think the "expert" needs some more research time.
Don't be that guy
@@mariyamwaniki don't be what guy? Someone who actually knows history and how equally terrible humans are to each other?
Your reply is only partially true. The first set of Africans who were captured were in deed captured by other Africans. But once Europeans learned the lay of the land and no longer needed the "middle men", they raided villages and did the capturing themselves. Entire European military operations were carried out against tribes which decimated entire populations of villages and tribes for most of the Slave trade. Also let's not forget, that the first Africans who were human traffickers did not fully understand what they were doing and the intentions of white Europeans. However overtime, Europeans turned against their "middle men" who became captives themselves. Let's aim to understand not to just comment.
@@JulzMcc I did say a little bit incorrect. But mind you if you think that human beings didn't understand that they were selling people for goods to other people.. I think that you are just saying that African people are stupid. Slavery in all its forms has been practiced on every single continent (except antarctica.) of this Earth and I don't think any group of people's or their ancestors were not able to contextualize the actions that they were doing. So I don't doubt that Europeans went and got slaves directly but that also doesn't negate the fact that Africans were also selling Africans into slavery. But from the information that I have read about the subject it was far easier for Africans to be purchased from other Africans by Europeans because it negated the risk of you having to directly raid a community. If you are a business owner.. a very deplorable business owner but a business owner nonetheless.. would you not want to mitigate risk? Of course.
@@JulzMcc Prove it. Also, Africans were being enslaved in 2500 BC, as well as others. Europeans are hardly the only people to practice slavery; why, Arabs have an impressive history.
Please buttress your claims about these slaving expeditions by the Europeans; I've never read about any major European slaving campaigns in Africa. Africa has been exporting people since time immemorial, as anyone with a cursory knowledge of African history would know.
Very well done and vital to our education. Humans have done, and continue to do, some awful things to each other and then try to rationalize it or attempt to erase it.
May GOD bless and protect you in the mighty name of JESUS! May GOD and JESUS break every chain the enemy has formed against you and liberate you! May GOD and JESUS fill you with GODliness and love to get through any challenge! GOD IS GOOD! JESUS IS GOOD! GOD is love in times of hate, GOD is strength in times of weakness, GOD is light in times of darkness, GOD is harmony in times of chaos, and GOD is all you need and more! If you need more love/strength/anything GOD is there! GOD LOVES YOU JESUS LOVES YOU! GOD BLESS!
I had no idea. Thanks.
Love this - please do more historical videos!!
Thank you!
Very important
You do realize that slavery was endemic around the world. The Muslims since 600ad dealt in slaves and still do to this day. By records, the slaves brought to this country were slaves sold to the ship owners in Africa.
Thank you for saying ad and not ce
WOW!!! This is an incredibly one sided view of the Isaac Royalls, their slaves, and their lives! It's unfortunate that people continue to attempt to rewrite history and denigrate those who were a part of it to suit their own particular views.
Well look at them. Two of the biggest left wing nut jobs trying to rewrite history like a commie. Newsflash democrats your party is the racist party.
I was thrilled to see Holly and Tracy together on a video. After a moment of fangirl glee I sobered and was filled with gratefulness for what the two of you do. I was not aware that any place like this existed. Just as with you podcast ep about the Tenement museum you've opened my eyes to another way history is living and breathing all around us. It's so important to be mindful of the fact that America is not an old nation, and these things are not all that far in the past, not in the grand scheme of things. We are still feeling the effects of these events in our society. (Speaking for Americans) Thank you again for all that you do to help broaden the perspectives of people all over the world. The two of you are heroes and role models for me that I put along side Isaac Asimov, Ursula K Lu Guin, and Trevor Noah.
May GOD bless and protect you in the mighty name of JESUS! May GOD and JESUS break every chain the enemy has formed against you and liberate you! May GOD and JESUS fill you with GODliness and love to get through any challenge! GOD IS GOOD! JESUS IS GOOD! GOD is love in times of hate, GOD is strength in times of weakness, GOD is light in times of darkness, GOD is harmony in times of chaos, and GOD is all you need and more! If you need more love/strength/anything GOD is there! GOD LOVES YOU JESUS LOVES YOU! GOD BLESS!
Back begining in the early 1980s and for many years that followed, my Uncle was a the Pres. of the Royall House Asso. and he and my aunt lived upstairs in the slave's quarters. One thing that is not shown would be the shackles on the walls of the basement of the "Slaves Quarters". Ironic he had this job.
Orwell warned us that history would be rewritten.
oh yeah he did
The only ones keeping people enslaved are the demorats.
Great job ladies! More videos please:)
Slavery was abolished EARLY in Massachussetts. Much to the credit of the Puritian forefathers, they believed such an institution to be an abomination. However they didn't abolish the trade in slaves via the trans-atlantic trade, the Crown protected the slave trade.
Don't talk about my uncle like that! He had shit to do and shit was a lil cra cra back then. We're here and we will assemble if needed!
they enslaved human beings for money. a lot of people got tortured and bad things happened..now the rich and the slaves died...each person is now facing the consequences of their action in the other life.
Quick aside, the first state admitted to the union that explicitly forbade slavery is Ohio in 1803, the 17th state.
These two look like they just got off of a tumbler rant about gender
What is the difference between slaves and pets?
Slaves make you money pets cost you money lol
RealTalk Yeah? Is that because slaves live off air and grow clothes, tools, and homes from positive thinking?.. Ugh!
Slaves are human beings
@@DocRealTalk slaves cost money too lol a lot of money
@@sainttrinian4570
Their labour & productivity generates a lot more wealth than the cost of their food, clothes and shelter. Unlike pets :P
People much what we were taught in the 70’s in southeastern Massachusetts.
will take cermia and amilia and stafania marocca and claudio marocca
when take them here on the ride theyill know the history ok!
quille a di umbare qusta storia di paulrevere!
what fun will on this ride when cermia and amialia and their mother and their father will learn it!
Lets talk about the basic concept of supply and demand.. Both the seller and buyer play a part, no?
Stick to how stuff works and stop promoting racism.
Let’s forget to mention one of the FIRST slave owners. He had an indentured servant, common at the time. The indentured servant finished his time of servitude and asked to be released. The man with whom he had indentured himself denied his release.
The man then packed up and left. Some how the “indentured” person as brought back to the village or area and taken to court by the man he had indentured himself to.
The man convinced the court that the indentured man had broken his contract. The court ordered the man to be “indentured for life” making the other man one of the first slave owners.
This man’s name was Anthony Johnson. A black man. Even in what would become the USA, there were many blacks who owned land, property AND slaves.
But this doesn’t fit the narrative of the race baiters and perpetual “victim” ideology.
let's forget.
Check colonial law. An Indentured Servant is not a slave. Slaves (by law) were slaves for life. Indentured Servants were under an Indenture for a fixed amount of time to pay off their fare. My ancestor Job Tyler, a White Englishman, made such an arrangement. A VAST MAJORITY of White Colonists came over as indentures. I honestly do not know of any Africans who came over as Indentures. We do know of escaped slaves who made their way up to Boston and worked on ships and at the warfs. The situation with the black community today is dismal. They got too used to welfare and stopped working, resulting in a narcotics dependency that led to violent crime and the Democrats let that fester rather than offering alternatives which has led to the violent anti-American, Communist BLM.
@@christianfreedom-seeker2025 Maybe a reading comprehension problem. No one said an indentured servant is by definition a “slave”. The man, according to writings in Massachusetts, finished his indentured servitude (note the word INDENTURED). The rest you can re-read. Especially the part about “servitude for life” by court ruling. If THAT’S not slavery then please show me different, not by your words, but references.
And not having lived the life of an indentured servant, who can say with 100% certainty their life and living conditions, in some cases, were not neck and neck with conditions a slave lived under. Especially the irish.
What about the Scottish slaves?
Scotts were sent to Boston as slaves/indentured servants long before the first Africans were brought to Massachusetts.
In fact, the very *first* slaves in Massachusetts were Scotts.
Be that as it may, the Scottish slaves did not endure almost 250 years of it. American slavery against people of African descent is unique in that your condition of servitude was inherited, based only on the color of one's skin and offered no pathway to citizenship even when one could find a loophole to freedom.
@@JulzMcc wait, are you saying Africans lived 250 years?
@@JulzMcc you need to read Thomas Sowell.
@@wayneparke554 lol 😂 Generations of African descendants for 250 years endured slavery. Scotts or any other people of indentures servitude, did not endure it for generations to the tune of 250 years.
@@wayneparke554 and likewise you need to read “The Life of Oladuah Equinado”
the Europeans weren't enslaving the Africans... they were purchasing them at the slave market in Africa. otherwise this is a great video.
Again...show evidence that all Europeons purchased Afrikans and did not force them into servitude...and does purchasing another human being as property make it right...do you purchase slaves?
"A slave purchased on the African coast for the equivalent of 14 English pounds in bartered goods in 1760 could sell for 45 pounds in the American market.
A slave's journey to a life of servitude often began in the interior of Africa with his or her capture as a prize of war, as tribute given by a weak tribal state to a more powerful one, or by outright kidnapping by local traders. European slave traders rarely ventured beyond Africa's coastal regions. The African interior was riddled with disease, the natives were often hostile and the land uncharted. The Europeans preferred to stay in the coastal region and have the natives bring the slaves to them." www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/slavetrade.htm
I don't have to prove they were all purchased. I just have to prove that the slave market was open. and it would be reasonable to assume the europeans engaged in the slavery described in this video would buy them rather than go on raiding parties into an unknown land with entrenched powers that would resist. It would have cost more for the europeans to do the raiding. purchasing slaves made cents and pounds.
Charles Labedz Here is proof that your innocent ancestors conducted raiding parties...
There have been instances of unprincipled captains, who, at the close of what they supposed their last voyage, and when they had no intention of revisiting the coast, have detained, and carried away, free people with them; and left the next ship, that should come from the same port, to risk the consequences.
spartacus-educational.com/USASafrica.htm
And answer my second question...does it still make it right?
From the same article as your quote; "The merchants obtained the slaves from African chiefs by giving them goods from Europe. At first, these slaves were often the captured soldiers from tribal wars. However, the demand for slaves become so great that raiding parties were organised to obtain young Africans."
your quote was an exerpt from;
"John Newton was a slave-captain between 1747 and 1754. He wrote in Thoughts upon the African Slave Trade (1787): "The slaves, in general, are bought, and paid for. Sometimes, when goods are lent, or trusted on shore, the trader voluntarily leaves a free person, perhaps his own son, as a hostage, or pawn, for the payment; and, in case or default, the hostage is carried off, and sold; which, however hard upon him, being in consequence of a free stipulation, cannot be deemed unfair. There have been instances of unprincipled captains, who, at the close of what they supposed their last voyage, and when they had no intention of revisiting the coast, have detained, and carried away, free people with them; and left the next ship, that should come from the same port, to risk the consequences. But these actions, I hope, and believe, are not common.""
so. why worry about right and wrong? its what happened. what difference does it make? DO i own any guilt for that period of time. NO I DO NOT! did it make sense for the time. yes.
Charles Labedz Thanks for admitting that you're no different than your murderous, savage, devil ancestors and that justifies my anger for you and your people---> "DO i own any guilt for that period of time. NO I DO NOT."
100% Garunteed those girls both on tumblr
Humm... interesting, from the British perspective the triangular slave trade is typically taught that the Americas as a whole (mostly in the US South and beyond, but not at all barring Northern colonies prior to their local abolitions) were the destinations for slaves who produced natural resources that were processed into industrial goods in the _UK_ instead.
Perhaps the US narrative is geared to depict the colonial US as industrially capable, or even to highlight the implementation of slave plantations in the Carribean colonies (as opposed to the continentals). At the end of the day it's probably just some lack of consensus from two different historical perspectives though.
That's my understanding of the subject as well. America was not a very industrialized society and relied heavily on the continent for manufacturing. Looking at many of the tools, weapons, ships, etc of the colonial and early american period show this, as well. It wasn't until around the 1830's and 1840's where America started industrializing at all via "technology transfers" from the Brits ;)
So what? Let's see something about the Republican President and the Army of mostly white men that ended it.
YOU NEED TO DO MORE STUDIES ON THE TOPIC , TO OFTEN NEW AMSTERDAM IS FORGOTTON AND THEIR SLAVE TRADE.
we are all human no matter color or race this is just sad i hate this time of history its just a shame how you can feel your better than someone just because your color or the fact that you had money
I need to take back my uncles house. Ya'll don't deserve to go check it out! We taking Harvard too! Get out my yard!
We were taught this in school before political correctness , why wasn't it mentioned that people also bought slaves to offer them their freedom or work for them for wages . Also Canada owned slaves at the same time as well.also black have no monopoly on being enslaved.no matter , it was still wrong no matter who the slaves were.
Sorry, can't take anyone serious with purple hair
Nexus is correct for the most part! However how is it nobody talks about the Irish that were slaves transported in terrible conditions sold to east India trading company then many here in the very early years.
One should not forget the Irish struggle; but their struggle is not the same for they did not endure almost 250 years of it. American slavery against people of African descent is unique in that your condition of servitude was inherited, based only on the color of one's skin and offered no pathway to citizenship even when one could find a loophole to freedom. The Irish were eventually absorbed into the broader white Euro-American culture and many became oppressors themselves as a way to participate in the larger culture and secure their status in the white social hierarchy.
King William the 3rd of Williamsburg Massachusetts
The thing that I find sad. Questioning if We ever stopped the practice or just repackaged it in a more sterile and attractive package.. =/
redneckhippiefreak watch 13th on netflix, that’ll answer your question
The thing that I find sad is that people still want to believe this is an issue =/
@@zilog1 If you dont think modern slavery is an issue that is best recognised by knowing and understanding slave history..Yes, there is no point worrying at all. xD
Yeah today, it’s still practiced else where yet we ignore this
Convict leasing and debt peonage would be the more repackaged version.
Who taught bowling pins to speak?
What sorcery is this?
I want pancakes
Pretty sure this story is incorrect and is the North American version.
Originally the slaves of Boston were Whites from Britain called The Quakers. At this timeline their Masters were Black Native Americans of New England.
Royals of Europe decided to change things up by freeing the Quakers and gave them their Masters as slaves. Many Quakers were against slavery and decided to leave for Pennsylvania. That's when the Royals decided to have Black Native Americans shipped from Boston to Algeria (Morocco).
They replaced these slaves with Indonesians from Madagascar and sold them advertised as slaves from Guinea in West Africa.
Similar to Keneen Ivory Wayans family are Indonesians not Africans. They are Indonesian Blacks (Austronesians/Asiatic People/Semitic People).
This did not sit well with Quakers and Harmonites because now the Master and the slaves were one in the same Eurasian People.
No slaves from West Africa were ever shipped to North America.
You mean stuff they didn’t teach! Right!
Incorrect information . African people were selling African people.
Close,very close.
More lame divisive nonsense
Smh at slavery
lol I knew in the back of my mind their so-called professional would be a black woman which in no way shape or form has ever been or will be a Slave.
REEEEEEEEEEE
Recent Movie " SOUND OF FREEDOM".
SHAME!!!! What is there to be proud of? It's disgraceful
I'm proud to be from New England. My family immigrated in the 1920s though 🤷🏻♂️ we can be proud
African tribes were capturing other tribes' people and selling them. She conveniently left that out.
Massachusetts doesn’t exist.
Wowwwwwwwwwwww I’m not happy to be a Bostonian right now
Lmao okay
Massachusetts doesn’t exist.
Don't forget the Irish.
ok u learn this . but I don't & not interested
I'm pretty sure that I'm not alone here in believing a purple hair girl regarding our country's history................. Seriously ? 😳 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Nice woke haircut 😆