Running To Time - Class 91 High Speed Train

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 79

  • @michaelgrey7854
    @michaelgrey7854 ปีที่แล้ว +98

    Its amazing how Britain can lead the world in developing technologies and then fall flat implementing it.

    • @Keithbarber
      @Keithbarber 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      There have been a number of examples
      We developed the jet airliner the comet in the 1950s, but some aircrashes saw Britain lose the initiative and Boeing took up the cudgels and the rest is history

    • @citizenmilitia1
      @citizenmilitia1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      We do have the potential to implement well. It's often politics or "middle England" that gets in the way

    • @waynejarrell1
      @waynejarrell1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Agreed. We end up selling or giving away the ideas.

    • @simonfrost7094
      @simonfrost7094 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@Keithbarber We developed the first domestic nuclear fission reactor power plant as well (Calder Hall) in the 1950s. Britain's domestic nuclear industry was privatised in the 1980s and there was little interest amongst the newly privatised companies to build new reactors to take care of Britain's future energy needs (the discovery of North Sea fossil fuels and lack of political will following Chernobyl played their parts). Now, the French and Chinese lead fission reactor construction - they're the ones building our newest reactors, e.g. Sizewell C!

    • @JakobHill
      @JakobHill 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@citizenmilitia1 replace "middle England" with "middle America", and it's the exact same problem over here.

  • @simonfrost7094
    @simonfrost7094 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    Remember when British TV channels (including Channel 4, which broadcast this one) were full of fascinating documentaries like this, which respect the intelligence of the viewer and have no dumbing down? QED, Horizon, Equinox, Cutting Edge. All documentary strands gone or dumbed down today.
    Even BBC Four is now just a repeats channel.

    • @IronFist.
      @IronFist. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Truth.

    • @WhatALoadOfTosca
      @WhatALoadOfTosca 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And the Beeb expect us to pay for Strictly, biased news, poor quality reporting, homes under the hammer and all sorts of other rubbish.

    • @muk8804
      @muk8804 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Totally agree. They cannot compete with the never-ending stream of streaming services and web shows with massive multinational backers, in an age where the under 30s do not use traditional media for their default news, current affairs, debate or entertainment as most above age 35 years are used to doing there fore advertising revenues are not forthcoming . Whatever ITV and commercial mainstream channels do ....the BBC are forced to do next by the government.

  • @marc21091
    @marc21091 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Patrick Uden and Paul Fabricius, the producers, were excellent film-makers conveying technical subjects clearly with well-edited interviews - as shown in this great film shown first on Channel 4 in 1988.

  • @DiggoryDiggory
    @DiggoryDiggory 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I love this, thanks for posting it. The subject matter interests me but more than that, I love the style of documentary making. If this was made now there would a ridiculous soundtrack implying drama that wasn't there, there would be a 'star' presenter who would be the focus of the camera rather than what was going on and there would be endless tiresome scenes of them in awe of what was going on. A bogey being fitting to the carriage!!!! Wow!!! It's unbelievable!!!!!!

    • @davidvines8141
      @davidvines8141  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for your comment. Like you I much prefer this "older" style of documentary.

  • @SDU1969
    @SDU1969 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    British Rail were so much better than the shysters we have now!

  • @BenDover-ln6ns
    @BenDover-ln6ns 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    What a superb insight in the building of the Class 91. Such a shame that all their hard work & testing for 140mph running never came to fruition, due to the poor infrastructure and planning. So much money must have been wasted through the development of the ECML modernisation of signalling etc, and all these years later we haven’t mastered anything over 125mph for longer distances than 20 miles. Some would say that’s a failure.

  • @soundseeker63
    @soundseeker63 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    A fascinating time capsule of a documentary, and surprisingly heavy on technical detail for something intended for the general public. The 225s, like the 125s, were/are very nice trains, and happily, some still in service in 2023! Though how much longer that lasts, who knows... I will be sad when they are gone. BR, for all its faults, did gift future generations with some really hard working, comfortable and iconic trains, as the HST and IC225 examplify.

  • @rwmodelrailway4416
    @rwmodelrailway4416 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    to think that now 35 years or so later they are still working Kings Cross to York and Leeds thow now only 10 out of 31 it will be a grate loss to see them go .

    • @davidvines8141
      @davidvines8141  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Class 91 sets still give the most comfortable ride on the BR Network in my opinion. As you say, it will be sad to see them go.

    • @robertgrahamwalker9938
      @robertgrahamwalker9938 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thay are the most comfortable ride they beat the 800's and most stock for that mater . @@davidvines8141

  • @richjames2540
    @richjames2540 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Shame the Government cut the funding for 140 mph signaling so they never exceeded 125 mph in service. The 800 class are actually slower than these and the HST.

  • @citizenmilitia1
    @citizenmilitia1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Narrator 1988: "Class 43 Intercity 125s will be replaced"
    Cross Country, Scott Rail, GWR all in 2023: "Nah, we're good"

    • @andrewwrench1959
      @andrewwrench1959 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Well that's because for most of the intervening period we've had governments that see the country's place as being in the third world not the developed world. There should have been a program of continuous electrification but we are faced with the ridiculous situation where the Great Western Mainline didn't even reach the main station of the target city. Just embarrassing.

    • @Ben31337l
      @Ben31337l 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@andrewwrench1959 And we continue to see governments like this.

    • @simonfrost7094
      @simonfrost7094 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@andrewwrench1959 I'd say it's more governments that want us to be a first world country, with first world infrastructure, but they don't want to pay for it. If an investment in infrastructure doesn't pay off within their term of government they're not interested.
      HS2 maybe the exception, but it's been so compromised by endless modifications and cuts to the route that it has also suffered from the dead hand of governments which want the benefits of first-world (dare one say Continental?) infrastructure without wanting to pay for it.

    • @AquaFonic
      @AquaFonic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      CROSS C is going 15th OCTOBER 2023 it’s contract GONE HST are being RETIRED BY GWR ( castle sets ) end of 2023 and Scot rail replacing theirs 2024 !!!!

  • @ArcturanMegadonkey
    @ArcturanMegadonkey 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I rode on a few class 91's this week and checked the speed using a GPS app, we reached 127mph on many occasions whereas the Azuma would only reach 124mph max when I rode them on the same track.
    I was on an East midlands rover ticket

    • @davidvines8141
      @davidvines8141  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's interesting, I have timed the Azuma's with GPS but never the Class 91's. I think the Azuma is probably faster accelerating but I still prefer to travel on the 91's when possible for a more comfortable journey.

    • @BenDover-ln6ns
      @BenDover-ln6ns 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      In the early 90s i timed a journey with 91021 with an average speed of 138mph over 76.25 miles. I was never good at maths nor still have my timings, but it covered 76.25 miles in 38 minutes. I’ll let someone else do the maths, but it was fast and way before black boxes, and when drivers were going home.

    • @leeosborne3793
      @leeosborne3793 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Azuma has a speed limiter fitted set at 200kph, which is approx. 124mph.

    • @ArcturanMegadonkey
      @ArcturanMegadonkey 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@leeosborne3793 brilliant, that is what i was wondering as on part 2 (yet to be edited) I noticed that Azumas were only doing 124mph whereas the Electra's were maxing out at 127mph

  • @kenstevens5065
    @kenstevens5065 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Fast forward to the end of the lives of these locomotives and we replace trains with assembly kits from Japan and our population with people from overseas, many unskilled and of unknown origin. Anyone see a pattern here? Clue, only a few people are getting richer.

  • @mikewatt8706
    @mikewatt8706 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Todays high speed trains have bogies split between to cars thus making the train much more sturdy. Also tracks are completly welded into very long sections except for expansion joints thus making the ride more quiet and smooth.

  • @mikewatt8706
    @mikewatt8706 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I maintained trains all over londin for many years including tube stock

  • @mikewatt8706
    @mikewatt8706 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My first ever flight was on the beautiful boeing 757.

  • @justandy333
    @justandy333 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    All this development for a 140mph train that still cannot flex its muscles properly on an infrastructure that can only support 125mph running. Must of been very frustrating for all the engineers involved.

  • @brickleyyard4966
    @brickleyyard4966 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I love at 16.33 mins in he says that the bogie Design was innovative, but yet they have been using Engines and driveshaft mounted beneath the body of the coach to power wheel sets since the very first diese Passenger trains Such as the 101 DMU.

    • @limeyfox
      @limeyfox 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Not mounted on the bogie though! The point was to minimise unsprung mass whilst permitting every axle in the locomotive to be powered. Previously the only way to do this was to mount the motor directly on the axle, thereby being unsprung and punishing the track.

  • @philipstanbridge6535
    @philipstanbridge6535 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Interestingly, nobody in the entire film mentioned safety

  • @DarkFire515
    @DarkFire515 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    1988... roughly the last time any train the UK actually ran on time.

    • @CARLIN4737
      @CARLIN4737 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      1898

  • @manomaylr
    @manomaylr 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    9:42 "The tilting train was dead."
    Thank you, Virgin, for believing.

  • @chrisbailiss7309
    @chrisbailiss7309 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The most fascinating part of this film are the people - all men, almost all in suits and most with a rather posh voice. How different the culture was then.

  • @peterbattey8263
    @peterbattey8263 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I never understand why people are in such a hurry. It seems to me everyone wants to be somewhere yesterday, why, what are they frightened of missing? Do they want get into their grave quicker and sooner? Seems that way to me.

    • @mattylamb658
      @mattylamb658 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I wanted to read all of your comment, but it is too long and I just don't have the time.😂

    • @peterbattey8263
      @peterbattey8263 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@mattylamb658 So you're a hurry person 🤪

    • @mattylamb658
      @mattylamb658 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@peterbattey8263 Ha ha, indeed!

  • @kineticdeath
    @kineticdeath 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    british rail operators now import tilting trains, decades after they binned their own. Why is that nation SO good at binning all its technological advantages?

  • @adamquirke6024
    @adamquirke6024 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Lets make something cutting edge, new and engineeringly exciting......nah we cant do it. What type of managing is that?

  • @jekanyika
    @jekanyika 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    4:10 I'm not sure about that.

  • @MEATYOKERRable
    @MEATYOKERRable 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm just curious.... it sounds like British Rail was very much like Amtrak. Why was it that BR was able to run passenger services efficiently and even introduce High Speed Rail all over Great Britain ALONG with freight and mail but Amtrak CAN'T get its act together on the Northeast Corridor? I know that Amtrak runs passenger trains as a utility so the Privatized Railroads don't have to and can focus on what makes money... FREIGHT. That means they have to make way for the Freight Trains, but Amtrak OWNS the Northeast Corridor tracks. Why does the US still lag behind the UK?

    • @hans2406
      @hans2406 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Because of the car industry, the oil industry, the airways industry are banding together to keep the passenger railways down.

  • @daveb0789
    @daveb0789 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The government prefers to invest money in roads than railways.

    • @davidvines8141
      @davidvines8141  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The government does invest in the railway, it has wasted getting on for £100 billion pounds on HS2!

    • @mattevans4377
      @mattevans4377 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@davidvines8141That wasn't money spent on HS2. That was money given to their mates.

    • @davidvines8141
      @davidvines8141  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mattevans4377 As I said, wasted.

    • @mattevans4377
      @mattevans4377 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@davidvines8141 It still isn't really spending money on railways though. If they actually were interested in investing in rail, HS2 would be built by now, and in full.

    • @davidranger4468
      @davidranger4468 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@mattevans4377Exactly! The French had their high speed rail link to the channel tunnel built before the tunnel opened. It took us 14 years.
      We spent 10 years dithering over HS2 in never ending cycles of feasability studies and impact assessments where any other European country would have had the darned thing up and running by now.
      Then you can tell it was put together by committee. It doesn't go where it needs to go (The Actual North) and doesn't connect to HS1 or the continent. That and nobody seems to have considered it's freight potential either - High speed parcels? High speed containers straight from the Southern Ports to the North.
      Classically British

  • @jirizlamal69
    @jirizlamal69 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What coaches are those shown at 17:57? Thanks in advance!

    • @davidvines8141
      @davidvines8141  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The coaches were built by LMS at Wolverton works and were streamlined to be hauled by the newly built streamlined Coronation Scot class locomotives in 1937. In this video It looks like they may be prototypes as when they were in service they had the same livery as the striped loco.

    • @jirizlamal69
      @jirizlamal69 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidvines8141 Thanks! It seems that the streamlined version was only used for the exhibition purposes. I've found something here: publictransportexperience.blogspot.com/2019/08/blue-or-red-theres-more-to-be-said-2.html

  • @mikewatt8706
    @mikewatt8706 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've travelled frim paris to Berlin a few times on the German ICE and when the train is due in Berlin at 1pm it arrives at 1 pm. If i take a train from london to Glasgow it never arrives in time.

    • @mattylamb658
      @mattylamb658 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hah you must be joking. I live in Germany and the reliability of trains is really not good. They are seldom on time and a bit of a national laughing stock. Meeting connections is a risky business.

    • @johnkelly1083
      @johnkelly1083 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Don't worry about arriving on time, you're lucky if it turns up at all.

  • @mikewatt8706
    @mikewatt8706 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Iv lived in uk for 33 years and i have to say things have improved except for the delays and cancellations due to greedy staff. Trains are newer and much improved. Billions have been spent on rolling stock and tracks. Prices ain't too bad either. I travelled from hull to leeds last week for £10. 1 hour trip.

    • @Andre-rt5hg
      @Andre-rt5hg 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I don’t know what you’re smoking but privatisation has been a disaster for rail fares

    • @hans2406
      @hans2406 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The railway industry is blighted with too much top brass and a shrinking workforce.
      Greedy workforce?
      No, a workforce that wants to earn a good salary.

  • @CHINZIG_UK
    @CHINZIG_UK 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Screw passenger comfort. I prefer railway aesthetics than efficiency. So now these days, thanks to money hording governments, everything on the railways breaks down and looks like crap, sacrifices aesthetics just to get idiots from A to B quicker.

  • @SKisatourist2010
    @SKisatourist2010 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Should be investing the east and west coast lines rather than building the monstrosity that is HS2