1. Let's bring someone whom you care about. (Can't be reduced) 2. Could you check the bottle under your seat? (changed to prepositional phrase) 3. The man bringing food to your home is very generous. ( doesn't look necessary to reduce it because people having limited know of English grammar won't be able to under it or as you said we should use a time marker with it. Like daily, sometimes etc ) 4. If you know a man brilliant at this, call him. (Changed to adjective phrase) 5. Tell me the place where you live. Can't be changed)
1.Let's bring someone whom you care about ( This sentence can not be reduced) 2. Could you check the bottle under your seat? 3. The man bringing food to your home is very generous. 4.If you know a man brilliant at this, call him. 5. Tell me the place where you live. (This sentence can' t be reduced) Thank you very much sir. This lesson is really important. And you did the best as usual .😊
In short can I write this - 1.When sentence is in active (in all tense present ,past,future )-use present participle(adj) 2.when sentence in passive (in all tense present ,past ,future )- use past participle 3.when there is modal like will,can etc -use infinitive as adjective (but not everytime ) CAN I SAY THIS SIR??????
thank you so much sir, Finally you have full fill my wish and accepted my request. again thanks you have responded to my request. sir, you have written you can find many people better than me. but seriously we can find any people better than you.
Sir , i want you to come with compound- complex sentence invested with many phrases of different catogories like we find in many non- fictional books....and to describe that phrases whom/which they modify in the long sentence with many short of phrases....
Hi, thank you so much. I really enjoyed wandering around the school by myself, and I still prefer to do things alone, including traveling and shopping. "including traveling and shopping", what is it? Present participle phrase?
Bro isme present perfect tense ka nahi banta kya reduce adjective clouse...jese the boy who has purched new car is over there...iska kese banega. Plzz ans bro
In short can I say this - 1.When sentence is in active (in all tense present ,past,future )-use present participle(adj) 2.when sentence in passive (in all tense present ,past ,future )- use past participle 3.when there is modal like will,can etc -use infinitive as adjective (but not everytime ) CAN I SAY THIS SIR??????
(The woman whom I love is here ). Can I reduce this sentence which is whom I love describe the woman . so will be (the woman I love is here) without whom when it comes to reduce
You say to us that we can't reduce a adjective clause when it have separate subject but you did that in your latest video for example, The actor whom we have approached for this role is busy with his own project right now. so my question is that how you do that
28:55 Doesn't it sound like he has to go China first to bring his friend 😂 Here I got to understand why sometimes we shouldn't reduce adjective clauses to phrases Btw great explanation bro❤
Hi sir, Hope you are fine.. As you mentioned in example The property which is being sold is expensive. What if there was "The property which was being sold is expensive". If we reduce it we get the same sentence that is "The property being sold is expensive". How should we consider the information about the property. Should we consider is being or was being.???
Hello, Ihsan! I'm doing well! Thank you for asking! The context makes you understand the tense that the phrase refers to. But if you are doubtful, use an adjective clause. Don't reduce it.
Regards. Would you mind explaining why in the sentence "everyone who is in the management are talking about the workers who are under your leadership" the to be verb "is" was used after the word "who" in the first part and "are" after the word "management?" Why "are" was used in the sentence "everyone in the management are talking about the workers under your leadership?" because as far as I know the to be verb "is" is used after the word "everyone" but in this case "are" was used. Thank you.
Sir , i really appreciate u for ur job that u have done for those ones who can't pay fee to be thought as u have thought English grammar... really I got much benefitted ,sir. I want you to clear the concept of putting participles at the end of sentence and make me know that if participles are put at the end of sentence with comma, does that participial phrase modify that immediate noun phrase that comes before the participles or the beginning of the noun phrase working as subject in whole sentence ? waiting for ur reply....
1.lets bring someone whom you care about ( not change) 2. Could you check the bottle under your seat?. 3. This man bringing food to your home is very generous. 4. If you know a brilliant man at this, call him. 5. Tell me the place where you live ( no change)
Wow just awesome. Not having learned English for about a year now, I'm reviewing some grammer. For the 4th question, can we say ut like this? If you know a man being brilliant at this, call him. Thanks man.
Sir new learner ke liye English me answer likhne ka tarika batayiye sir please 🙏,,, abhi abhi Maine medium change kiya hai sir Sir plzz video bana dijiye
The students who will attend the meeting will be given a certificate . Can I write the above sentence in this way --the students attending the meeting will be given a certificate .. Can I transform will+ attend into attending as the sentence is in active voice ..Therefore attending here has become a present participle (adjective)... I am correct or not sir ?Please reply .. I want to know whether a sentence based on future tense can also be reduced using present participle .
@@EnglishWithAshish the house which will be built will be dedicated to the school ..Can I reduce this sentence in this way --the house built will be dedicated to the school .. As the sentence is passive one I have used past participle built functioning as adjective .... But in maximum cases it is written as to+ be +v3rd (in this case it will be to be built ) because will is modal verb and infinitive can replace modal in a sentence in fact we can reduce adj clause using infinitive when there is modal verb in a sentence like can, should , will ,must ,etc... Ex.the students who will attend the meeting will be given a certificate Can I write this sentence in this way ..--the students to attend the meeting will be given a certificate . Am I correct sir ? Are all my explanations stated above correct sir? Please reply sir🙏.... 1.THE HOUSE BUILT WILL BE DEDICATED TO THE STUDENTS .(the house which will be built will be dedicated to the school ){using past participle} 2.THE STUDENTS TO ATTEND THE MEETING WILL BE GIVEN A CERTIFICATE .(the students who will attend the meeting will be given a certificate ){using infinitive replacing modal verb } 【but I think if I use 'to be built' instead of built in 1 no sentence it will give more clarity about the meaning of the sentence but grammatically if I use direct past participle' built ' as an adjective ,it will also correct as non finite verb has no tense ..Am I correct sir ?】 CAN I WRITE THESE TWO SENTENCES FOLLOWING THE EXPLANATION I HAVE MENTIONED ABOVE ??????
the house which will be built will be dedicated to the school ..Can I reduce this sentence in this way --the house built will be dedicated to the school .. As the sentence is passive one I have used past participle built functioning as adjective .... But in maximum cases it is written as to+ be +v3rd (in this case it will be to be built ) because will is modal verb and infinitive can replace modal in a sentence in fact we can reduce adj clause using infinitive when there is modal verb in a sentence like can, should , will ,must ,etc... Ex.the students who will attend the meeting will be given a certificate Can I write this sentence in this way ..--the students to attend the meeting will be given a certificate . Am I correct sir ? Are all my explanations stated above correct sir? Please reply sir🙏.... 1.THE HOUSE BUILT WILL BE DEDICATED TO THE STUDENTS .(the house which will be built will be dedicated to the school ){using past participle} 2.THE STUDENTS TO ATTEND THE MEETING WILL BE GIVEN A CERTIFICATE .(the students who will attend the meeting will be given a certificate ){using infinitive replacing modal verb } 【but I think if I use 'to be built' instead of built in 1 no sentence it will give more clarity about the meaning of the sentence but grammatically if I use direct past participle' built ' as an adjective ,it will also correct as non finite verb has no tense ..Am I correct sir ?】 CAN I WRITE THESE TWO SENTENCES FOLLOWING THE EXPLANATION I HAVE MENTIONED ABOVE ??????
It has been a utterly marvellous lesson. May I trouble you for a question? Are you going to teach how to reduce an Adverb clause? Perfect cheers. Love you. A
Hello brother i hope you will be fine I have a doubt, as you mentioned that if a adjective clause starts with 'when' we can't change it but there is a sentence like' i saw him when he was dancing' We can convert it like 'i saw him dancing'
Wow , this is the best and most informative explanation I've ever seen for this topic dear AShish❤ By the way , Can I argue that we call an adjective clause a dependent clause because it depends on a noun in the indepndent clause? so without that noun it depends on it would't make any sense on its own.
sir if we have a reduced clause how can we judge its original clause? for example a reduced clause like the girl standing next to the max is my school crush. its original can be the girl who stands next to the max is my school crush the girl who is standing next to the max is my school crush in the above both sentence which we will consider the original although both are correct I guess. sir, please clear my this doubt. thanks, dear sir
That's a good question, my friend. If a reduced clause comes next to a noun or pronoun, it will be a reduced adjective clause. Or simply look at its function. That is the best way to identify it. Hope it helps! 😊
Hi Teacher Ashish Sharma! It`s an awesome video lesson. The explanations are concise, clear, and understandable. The lesson is detailed in chronological order. This makes it very interesting and helpful. Great! Good job! Here is my homework: 1. can't be reduced 2. Could you check the bottle under your seat? 3. The man bringing food to your home is very generous. 4. If you know a man brilliant at this, call him. 5. can't be reduced I would be pleased if you could make a lesson about Reduced Noun Clauses. I`m very confused on this topic. Please and thank you. Best Wishes, Fazil
Thank you for the kind words, Fazil! Hearing from you after a long time. Your answers are correct! Great job! 👏 I don't think noun clauses can be reduced. I'll still check its possibility.
Let's look at the following sentence. Working hard, Ram will definitely succeed. I think the sentence could have two meanings. 1.There is a condition that if Ram works hard , he will definitely succeed. 2.Ram is someone who works hard and he will succeed.This is a reduced form. How it's reduced is here, Ram, who works hard, will definitely succeed. =Ram, working hard, will definitely succeed. =Working hard, Ram will definitely succeed. (We often place the participle phrase at the beginning) Is my concept correct? I'm so confused. Please help me out. If my explanation is correct, which meaning is to choose? 1 or 2 ?
@@EnglishWithAshish So I can say this is ambiguous. Actually this is because of the commas that are put in non restrictive clauses. If the sentences I've given were restrictive ones, it wouldn't be ambiguous. We place the participle phrase from middle to the beginning only for non restrictive clauses and that makes those ambiguous. I think so. Don't you ?
sir must reply: I have this doubt from several days Problem: The boy taken to the hospital has recovered. The boy who is taken to the hospital has recovered Or The boy who was taken to the hospital has recovered Solution: Sir is this true because the main clause and relative clause both are in present tense whatever the tense (present simple/perfect) Sir which one is correct?
Both are possible. The boy taken to... (Here, "taken to..." is a reduced adjective clause) And in the other two sentences, we are just referring to different tenses in the adjective clauses. That's your choice as a writer. Both are correct.
Hi ..could you plzz clear my doubt.. How to reduce this ?? Who has/have/had + V3 (perfect) If the sentence doesn't have (after) in (perfect tense) can we reduce this? As i have seen all the sentences of perfect tense with the word after.
@@EnglishWithAshish How to reduce this?? Que. Which has resulted in Reduced form 1. Having resulted in 2. Resulting in Which one is correct 1 or 2?? Plz just reply 1 or 2.
@@EnglishWithAshish ok ☺ Thank you. But i didn't find as simple, easy and detailed video on reduced clause as you have made. Your teaching style is amazing. I enjoy watching your videos as i love grammar. It's both infomative & fun. 😀
1. Let's bring someone whom you care about. 2. Could you check the bottle (that is) under your seat? Assertive statement: Check the bottle (that is) under your seat. (Imperative statement) (YU) - subject. Check - verb. The bottle - object. ( both the speaker and the listener know which bottle) Under the seat - adjective phrase? 🤔 3. The man bringing (who brings) food to your home is very generous. 4. If you know a brilliant man at this, call him. 5. Tell me the place where you live. ( tell me the place, you live? 🤔)
1. can't be reduced 2. Could you check the bottle under your seat? 3. The man bringing food to your home is very generous. 4. If you know a man brilliant at this, call him. 5. can't be reduced
Felt offended , censor board has taken down the movie. Felt offended is reduced adjective Clause which can be write as? Censor board felt offended ( here we use bare passive infinitive as object ? (To be offended)
@@EnglishWithAshish sorry , you dont get what I am asking . (Felt offended ) past participle how you form it I mean how you reduced it past participle phrase from adjiective clause? censor board that felt offended ( past indefinite ) should it not be reduced to Feeling offended ? Why you reduced it to felt offended Sir also I don't undrstand why you used past participle (offended) as object beacuse we use regular noun , pronun or gerund for object .
Extending thanks for bringing such important grammar topics which I frequently stumble reading novels used in paragraphs which makes me a bit frustrating to decode reduced clauses. But, after watching your videos consistently, I'm getting to analyze them properly so far, therefore, can't thank you enough for what I have learned and I'm happy finding your channel learning through it. Ps: You could find I've used clauses, Thanks to you!
This is the most comprehensive video I have ever watched on TH-cam about this topic.
Glad you liked it! Keep learning and supporting! 🌸
Thanks sir for your great video.
You're welcome!
You are an awesome teacher.
Thank you for the kind words! 🌸
Nice lesson,thanks
Really , i got benfitted by ur way of teaching..
Happy to hear that! Keep learning and stay connected! 😊
EXPLAINED NICELY
Exlent lesson, thanks
You're welcome! 🌸
Really impressed...
Thank you! 🌸
Omg, i found an excellent teacher here! thank you sir, for your amazing explanation^^
That's so sweet of you to say! Happy to help! 🌸
This is awesome. I have so many douts before watching this vedio.
Glad to hear that!
1. Let's bring someone whom you care about. (Can't be reduced)
2. Could you check the bottle under your seat? (changed to prepositional phrase)
3. The man bringing food to your home is very generous. ( doesn't look necessary to reduce it because people having limited know of English grammar won't be able to under it or as you said we should use a time marker with it. Like daily, sometimes etc )
4. If you know a man brilliant at this, call him. (Changed to adjective phrase)
5. Tell me the place where you live. Can't be changed)
Great job! 👏
Astonishing such a work of art !! ❤
Glad you liked it! Keep learning and stay connected! 😊❤️
Great video
Thank you! 😊
Thank you so much sir
You are welcome, Amir!
Trust me, I have fallen in love with your classes.... 💕💕
Glad you like them!
Amazing
Thank you!
Very nice session
😊
Thanks sir
🙏
Glad you liked it, Vijay! 😊
Good job 👍
Thank you, prince.
1.Let's bring someone whom you care about ( This sentence can not be reduced)
2. Could you check the bottle under your seat?
3. The man bringing food to your home is very generous.
4.If you know a man brilliant at this, call him.
5. Tell me the place where you live. (This sentence can' t be reduced)
Thank you very much sir. This lesson is really important. And you did the best as usual .😊
Brilliant work as expected from you! Keep learning!
And thank you for the kind words! 😊
In short can I write this -
1.When sentence is in active (in all tense present ,past,future )-use present participle(adj)
2.when sentence in passive (in all tense present ,past ,future )- use past participle
3.when there is modal like will,can etc -use infinitive as adjective (but not everytime )
CAN I SAY THIS SIR??????
God... Usually news editors use these frugal way of grammar to reduce many words...
Thanks a lot for Explaining! it.
You're welcome, Vaishi! 🌸
Thank you tchr. Ashish i learned a lot from your videos but some of your video like this don't have a louder audio.
Thank you so much for your explanation. Your summaries are very clear. I already followed you.👍
Glad you find my videos helpful! Keep learning and supporting, Natalie! 🌸
thank you so much sir, Finally you have full fill my wish and accepted my request. again thanks you have responded to my request. sir, you have written you can find many people better than me. but seriously we can find any people better than you.
Glad you liked it! Keep learning and stay connected!
Sir , i want you to come with compound- complex sentence invested with many phrases of different catogories like we find in many non- fictional books....and to describe that phrases whom/which they modify in the long sentence with many short of phrases....
Noted! I'll do somthing about it. 😊
Sir,which one is correct?
Who are happy?
Who is happy?
Thanks 🙏 🙏🙏🙏
You're welcome! 😊
Hi, thank you so much.
I really enjoyed wandering around the school by myself, and I still prefer to do things alone, including traveling and shopping.
"including traveling and shopping", what is it? Present participle phrase?
Yes
Bro isme present perfect tense ka nahi banta kya reduce adjective clouse...jese the boy who has purched new car is over there...iska kese banega. Plzz ans bro
Can we use proper noun before the modifying phrase in ing form
thank u so much !
I was able to understand this topic well
Glad you could. Happy to help!
In short can I say this -
1.When sentence is in active (in all tense present ,past,future )-use present participle(adj)
2.when sentence in passive (in all tense present ,past ,future )- use past participle
3.when there is modal like will,can etc -use infinitive as adjective (but not everytime )
CAN I SAY THIS SIR??????
Not precisely, Prince. Not every verb in the passive voice functions as an adjective. It has to be understood in the context it is used.
First view and superb
Awesome! ❤️
You are amazıng
Thank you!
(The woman whom I love is here ). Can I reduce this sentence which is whom I love describe the woman . so will be (the woman I love is here) without whom when it comes to reduce
If a relative clause starts with What, could it be changed into reduced pharses????
You say to us that we can't reduce a adjective clause when it have separate subject but you did that in your latest video for example, The actor whom we have approached for this role is busy with his own project right now. so my question is that how you do that
❤️🙏🏼
🌸
Please upload a video on - " Reduced Adverb clause " also. 🙏🙏
Will be doing it soon, Amit!
28:55
Doesn't it sound like he has to go China first to bring his friend 😂
Here I got to understand why sometimes we shouldn't reduce adjective clauses to phrases
Btw great explanation bro❤
Haha! Good observation! 🤣
Hi sir,
Hope you are fine..
As you mentioned in example
The property which is being sold is expensive. What if there was "The property which was being sold is expensive". If we reduce it we get the same sentence that is "The property being sold is expensive". How should we consider the information about the property. Should we consider is being or was being.???
Hello, Ihsan! I'm doing well! Thank you for asking!
The context makes you understand the tense that the phrase refers to. But if you are doubtful, use an adjective clause. Don't reduce it.
Thank u sir
And plz make a video on cleft sentence.
You're welcome, Himanshu!
Sure! Noted!
Regards. Would you mind explaining why in the sentence "everyone who is in the management are talking about the workers who are under your leadership" the to be verb "is" was used after the word "who" in the first part and "are" after the word "management?"
Why "are" was used in the sentence "everyone in the management are talking about the workers under your leadership?" because as far as I know the to be verb "is" is used after the word "everyone" but in this case "are" was used.
Thank you.
Hello Tarek,
That's a mistake. The main verb should be IS as 'everyone' (the subject) is singular. You're absolutely right here.
Do you have any lecture on 'the use of that, which and who as a relative pronoun ' and use of different modals, ' plz
Yes, on the channel!
thank you so much
You're majed! 😊
Sir , i really appreciate u for ur job that u have done for those ones who can't pay fee to be thought as u have thought English grammar... really I got much benefitted ,sir. I want you to clear the concept of putting participles at the end of sentence and make me know that if participles are put at the end of sentence with comma, does that participial phrase modify that immediate noun phrase that comes before the participles or the beginning of the noun phrase working as subject in whole sentence ? waiting for ur reply....
Appreciate the kind words, Pankaj!
Watch the lessons on participle phrases to find out the answers to your question.
1.lets bring someone whom you care about ( not change)
2. Could you check the bottle under your seat?.
3. This man bringing food to your home is very generous.
4. If you know a brilliant man at this, call him.
5. Tell me the place where you live ( no change)
Glad you tried, Neelu! 👏
The you very much the lesson is really clear and useful please could you also make a lesson about reduced adver clause as well
Glad you liked the lesson, Hemn! Yes, the lesson on reduced adverb clauses is next.
Wow just awesome. Not having learned English for about a year now, I'm reviewing some grammer.
For the 4th question, can we say ut like this?
If you know a man being brilliant at this, call him.
Thanks man.
Yes. Or simply: If you know a man brilliant at this, call him.
Sir new learner ke liye English me answer likhne ka tarika batayiye sir please 🙏,,, abhi abhi Maine medium change kiya hai sir
Sir plzz video bana dijiye
Dost aapko technicalities to seekhni padegi! There is no shortcut to it. Topics suggest kar sakte hai aap!
Sir " Case 4" mien "Is the guy who helps you in coding are coming to the party" ho gaa jab k ap ny sirf " coming to the party" likha hai? Aisaa q
Is coming
The students who will attend the meeting will be given a certificate .
Can I write the above sentence in this way --the students attending the meeting will be given a certificate ..
Can I transform will+ attend into attending as the sentence is in active voice ..Therefore attending here has become a present participle (adjective)...
I am correct or not sir ?Please reply ..
I want to know whether a sentence based on future tense can also be reduced using present participle .
Yes, that's correct.
@@EnglishWithAshish the house which will be built will be dedicated to the school ..Can I reduce this sentence in this way --the house built will be dedicated to the school ..
As the sentence is passive one I have used past participle built functioning as adjective ....
But in maximum cases it is written as to+ be +v3rd (in this case it will be to be built ) because will is modal verb and infinitive can replace modal in a sentence in fact we can reduce adj clause using infinitive when there is modal verb in a sentence like can, should , will ,must ,etc...
Ex.the students who will attend the meeting will be given a certificate
Can I write this sentence in this way ..--the students to attend the meeting will be given a certificate .
Am I correct sir ? Are all my explanations stated above correct sir? Please reply sir🙏....
1.THE HOUSE BUILT WILL BE DEDICATED TO THE STUDENTS .(the house which will be built will be dedicated to the school ){using past participle}
2.THE STUDENTS TO ATTEND THE MEETING WILL BE GIVEN A CERTIFICATE .(the students who will attend the meeting will be given a certificate ){using infinitive replacing modal verb }
【but I think if I use 'to be built' instead of built in 1 no sentence it will give more clarity about the meaning of the sentence but grammatically if I use direct past participle' built ' as an adjective ,it will also correct as non finite verb has no tense ..Am I correct sir ?】
CAN I WRITE THESE TWO SENTENCES FOLLOWING THE EXPLANATION I HAVE MENTIONED ABOVE ??????
@@EnglishWithAshish please reply sir.....🙏
May I ask how to reduce sth like this?
That+subject+can+verb
Thank you!
Don't reduce this structure for the sake for it. The reduction won't have the same meaning.
Thank you so much. Could you explain how to use being in a reduced clause?
There's a detailed lesson on the uses of BEING on our channel. Give it a visit, Ram! 😊
the house which will be built will be dedicated to the school ..Can I reduce this sentence in this way --the house built will be dedicated to the school ..
As the sentence is passive one I have used past participle built functioning as adjective ....
But in maximum cases it is written as to+ be +v3rd (in this case it will be to be built ) because will is modal verb and infinitive can replace modal in a sentence in fact we can reduce adj clause using infinitive when there is modal verb in a sentence like can, should , will ,must ,etc...
Ex.the students who will attend the meeting will be given a certificate
Can I write this sentence in this way ..--the students to attend the meeting will be given a certificate .
Am I correct sir ? Are all my explanations stated above correct sir? Please reply sir🙏....
1.THE HOUSE BUILT WILL BE DEDICATED TO THE STUDENTS .(the house which will be built will be dedicated to the school ){using past participle}
2.THE STUDENTS TO ATTEND THE MEETING WILL BE GIVEN A CERTIFICATE .(the students who will attend the meeting will be given a certificate ){using infinitive replacing modal verb }
【but I think if I use 'to be built' instead of built in 1 no sentence it will give more clarity about the meaning of the sentence but grammatically if I use direct past participle' built ' as an adjective ,it will also correct as non finite verb has no tense ..Am I correct sir ?】
CAN I WRITE THESE TWO SENTENCES FOLLOWING THE EXPLANATION I HAVE MENTIONED ABOVE ??????
That's correct. And please keep the question short or ask them in separate comments.
@@EnglishWithAshish thank u sir 🙏
Please upload reduced adverb class in detail
Sure. That's next.
" The boy who was pleased by his grades went out with his friends " ye kis case ka sentence ho ga sir. Please reply
Simple sentence
It has been a utterly marvellous lesson. May I trouble you for a question?
Are you going to teach how to reduce an Adverb clause? Perfect cheers. Love you. A
Thank you, Andrea! Glad you liked it!
Yes, it's next.
Sir please start hidu news paper Grammar analysis
I'll start it soon!
@@EnglishWithAshish please start sir my friends have been waiting for this series. This week
I'll try!
Yes we need it sir
I'll start it soon!
Hello brother i hope you will be fine
I have a doubt, as you mentioned that if a adjective clause starts with 'when' we can't change it but there is a sentence like' i saw him when he was dancing'
We can convert it like 'i saw him dancing'
It's not an adjective clause; it's an adverb clause here. The adjective clause referring to time is followed by the noun TIME.
Wow , this is the best and most informative explanation I've ever seen for this topic dear AShish❤
By the way , Can I argue that we call an adjective clause a dependent clause because it depends on a noun in the indepndent clause? so without that noun it depends on it would't make any sense on its own.
Thank you, brother! You don't have to argue that; I had mentioned it in the lesson! 🤭
sir if we have a reduced clause how can we judge its original clause?
for example a reduced clause like
the girl standing next to the max is my school crush.
its original can be
the girl who stands next to the max is my school crush
the girl who is standing next to the max is my school crush
in the above both sentence which we will consider the original although both are correct I guess.
sir, please clear my this doubt. thanks, dear sir
That's a good question, my friend.
If a reduced clause comes next to a noun or pronoun, it will be a reduced adjective clause.
Or simply look at its function. That is the best way to identify it.
Hope it helps! 😊
@@EnglishWithAshish thanks our English leader
😊👏
Hindi mein video banao sir. Agar english shikhani hein to? ❤❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Hi Teacher Ashish Sharma!
It`s an awesome video lesson. The explanations are concise, clear, and understandable. The lesson is detailed in chronological order. This makes it very interesting and helpful. Great! Good job!
Here is my homework:
1. can't be reduced
2. Could you check the bottle under your seat?
3. The man bringing food to your home is very generous.
4. If you know a man brilliant at this, call him.
5. can't be reduced
I would be pleased if you could make a lesson about Reduced Noun Clauses. I`m very confused on this topic.
Please and thank you.
Best Wishes,
Fazil
Thank you for the kind words, Fazil! Hearing from you after a long time.
Your answers are correct! Great job! 👏
I don't think noun clauses can be reduced. I'll still check its possibility.
Tha man wrıtıng like thıs must understand every topıc ın english😊
I am learning some languages which I like to learn.
Very good!
Let's look at the following sentence.
Working hard, Ram will definitely succeed.
I think the sentence could have two meanings.
1.There is a condition that if Ram works hard , he will definitely succeed.
2.Ram is someone who works hard and he will succeed.This is a reduced form. How it's reduced is here,
Ram, who works hard, will definitely succeed.
=Ram, working hard, will definitely succeed.
=Working hard, Ram will definitely succeed. (We often place the participle phrase at the beginning)
Is my concept correct? I'm so confused. Please help me out. If my explanation is correct, which meaning is to choose? 1 or 2 ?
I wouldn't disagree with you. These meanings can be interpreted from the given structure.
@@EnglishWithAshish So I can say this is ambiguous. Actually this is because of the commas that are put in non restrictive clauses. If the sentences I've given were restrictive ones, it wouldn't be ambiguous. We place the participle phrase from middle to the beginning only for non restrictive clauses and that makes those ambiguous. I think so. Don't you ?
No. Here, you used a tense that complicates the meaning. It generally is used with the Simple Past tense.
sir must reply: I have this doubt from several days
Problem:
The boy taken to the hospital has recovered.
The boy who is taken to the hospital has recovered
Or
The boy who was taken to the hospital has recovered
Solution:
Sir is this true because the main clause and relative clause both are in present tense whatever the tense (present simple/perfect)
Sir which one is correct?
Both are possible.
The boy taken to... (Here, "taken to..." is a reduced adjective clause)
And in the other two sentences, we are just referring to different tenses in the adjective clauses. That's your choice as a writer. Both are correct.
@@EnglishWithAshish thanks our leader
I want to take the book on the table. Is this sentence right sir?
Yes. It does have a meaning.
@@EnglishWithAshish Thank u sir🙏🙏🙏
Hi ..could you plzz clear my doubt..
How to reduce this ??
Who has/have/had + V3 (perfect)
If the sentence doesn't have (after) in (perfect tense) can we reduce this?
As i have seen all the sentences of perfect tense with the word after.
Structure wise, we can. But it won't give clarity about the right time of the action. So, we should rather use an adjective clause here.
@@EnglishWithAshish Thank you so much for replying 😍😍 plzz post more videos on advance grammar 😀
@@EnglishWithAshish
How to reduce this??
Que. Which has resulted in
Reduced form
1. Having resulted in
2. Resulting in
Which one is correct 1 or 2??
Plz just reply 1 or 2.
You're welcome. There's a lot of videos on advanced English.
Don't reduce it to a phrase as it's a non-essential adjective clause.
@@EnglishWithAshish ok ☺ Thank you. But i didn't find as simple, easy and detailed video on reduced clause as you have made. Your teaching style is amazing. I enjoy watching your videos as i love grammar. It's both infomative & fun. 😀
1. Let's bring someone whom you care about.
2. Could you check the bottle (that is) under your seat?
Assertive statement:
Check the bottle (that is) under your seat.
(Imperative statement)
(YU) - subject.
Check - verb.
The bottle - object. ( both the speaker and the listener know which bottle)
Under the seat - adjective phrase? 🤔
3. The man bringing (who brings) food to your home is very generous.
4. If you know a brilliant man at this, call him.
5. Tell me the place where you live.
( tell me the place, you live? 🤔)
Correction 4: a man brilliant at this...
(If it was just an adjective, we could place it before the noun modified)
Good job! 👏
1. can't be reduced
2. Could you check the bottle under your seat?
3. The man bringing food to your home is very generous.
4. If you know a man brilliant at this, call him.
5. can't be reduced
Correct answers! Good job! 👏
@@EnglishWithAshish Thank you!
1.Let's bring someone you care about.
5. Tell me the place you live.
I apologize I meant adverb clause
I knew what you meant. :)
I don't know what kind of clause it is please let me know
You know the boy who has worn my shirt
How to reduce it explain it in detail
You know the boy wearing my shirt.
@@EnglishWithAshish But here there is no " be" form It is "has". I believe this rule is not applicable for other than "be" forms
There is a past participle in the clause.
Please provide this data in the pdf format
I don't have it in the pdf format, but I'll start working on it soon.
Felt offended , censor board has taken down the movie.
Felt offended is reduced adjective Clause which can be write as?
Censor board felt offended ( here we use bare passive infinitive as object ? (To be offended)
It's working as an adverb too.
@@EnglishWithAshish sorry , you dont get what I am asking .
(Felt offended ) past participle how you form it I mean how you reduced it past participle phrase from adjiective clause?
censor board that felt offended ( past indefinite )
should it not be reduced to
Feeling offended ?
Why you reduced it to felt offended
Sir also I don't undrstand why you used past participle (offended) as object beacuse we use regular noun , pronun or gerund for object .
Sir hindi me sikayi sir
Watch videos from my Hindi channel: Angrezi ki class
Extending thanks for bringing such important grammar topics which I frequently stumble reading novels used in paragraphs which makes me a bit frustrating to decode reduced clauses. But, after watching your videos consistently, I'm getting to analyze them properly so far, therefore, can't thank you enough for what I have learned and I'm happy finding your channel learning through it. Ps: You could find I've used clauses, Thanks to you!
Thank you for the kind words, Summaiya! Glad I could help. Keep learning! 🌸
Amazing video
Thank you, Dhruv!
Thank so much sir
Glad you liked it! You're welcome, Sanatana!