Camera in Huawei p40 pro maybe the best on the market, but im looking for a phone, twice cheaper, but with great camera too. After your review between mi note 10 vs hiawei p40 pro, there is only one winner and it is xiaomi mi note 10 if taking a price + camera performance. Question about zoom, you have a video camparing xiaomi mi note 10 vs huawei p30 pro. Is it a big difference between xiaomi mi note 10 and huawei p40 pro using a zoom?? A few days ago xiaomi have a new phone called xiaomi mi 10 youth edition with 5 x perescope zoom + huawei have a new phone honor 30 pro with a perescope 5x zoom. So zoom is important for me, because im using a telescope + phone(xiaomi mi mix2s). And want to change a phone with a god image quality + good zoom. A lot of info about new phones and hard to chose the best for price and camera performance.
@@lorenzcaptures7492 one more thing, on last video you upload pictures with the moon, can you upload a few conprasions between xiaomi mi note 10 vs huawei p40 pro zoom battle 5x, 10 x and 50 x taking pictures, no moon just daylight photos.
Complimenti per aver raggiunto e superato i 1000 iscritti, è fantastico p40 pro veramente tanta roba, ma per ottenere foto così ovviamente il telefono lo tieni su un treppiedi? Con pixel 3 tiro fuori scatti bellissimi al buio totale con la modalità notturna e l'astrografia ma uno zoom ottico é un altra cosa rispetto anche al miglior zoom digitale. Assolutamente p40 pro il miglior cameraphone sul mercato
Yeah i really wanna go back to huawei but that aint happen untill it gets google back! My last phone was P30 pro and now i have oneplus 7t pro Mclaren Edition. Great phone, but the camera doesnt come close to huawei leica camera!
MasterPiece, OnePlus 7t Pro McLaren edition is a gorgeous phone. But cameras are not the point of strength of OnePlus phones😜 (I'm not saying they take bad pictures, but they're a step behind top cameraphones!)
Lorenz Captures Then at 5x or 10x? This isn't an issue because a raw file at 50x would be just a crop anyway. You would only have to make sure that you don't overexpose the moon.
Even the "super resolution" algorithms are not relevant because the P40 Pro's periscope camera suffers from the same amount of diffraction as a 12 megapixel crop of a Canon Aps-c 24 megapixel camera at f/12.6. (√(330.9mm²x(12/24)/12mm²) x 3.4 ≈ 12.6 And I have done an experiment that indicates that at f/13 (with base Iso equivalent exposure time) a higher megapixel count wouldn't lead to more details (Sigma 105mm with same effective aperture diameter as Ef-m 32mm f/13 on a tripod doesn't resolve more details from distant objects). So I would say that in this case a super resolution algorithm is physically impossible regarding Huawei's effective aperture diameter, unless the resolution suffers from noise and from distortion caused by the atmosphere. So a raw file at 5x could say a lot.
After looking on the moon photo again and again and after comparing it with moon photos from large cameras, the result was likely enhanced in some way. The moon photo looks twodimensional (no details on the edge of the disc) and it resolves several details so well as a Canon M50 + 105mm lens , this should be impossible as the Canon + 105mm lens has four times as many pixels per lunar crater. Some details of the Huawei moon jpg are even noticeably cleaner.
I have deleted my previous comment. I was sure that Huawei doesn't fake the moon, but I have looked at a translation of the allegation. The arguments seem to be extremely convincing and can't be explained by super resolution algorithms. Huawei denied that they fake the moon (actually they didn't deny it because they didn't deny machine learning zoom, which can do whatever the AI wants), but they didn't comment on the very convincing arguments/proofs. Furthermore I took a moon photo with a Canon M50 with a Sigma 105mm lens at f/8 at Iso 640. Surprisingly the Huawei photo had a similar amount of details and even looked cleaner, although in theory the Canon has an advantage that is comparable to the difference between 2x and 1x zoom. √(11.9mm²/330.9mm²) x(105mm/14.46mm) x √(24megapixels/11.9megapixels) ≈ 1.96 (I didn't take Canon's anti aliasing filter into account, but I also didn't take into account that Huawei's lens suffers a bit from diffraction) One needs to look at Huawei's dng file.
Here you can take a look at original files of the photos I took in the video, enjoy!
Link: photos.app.goo.gl/PDrNXreoPpakVeDV8
Camera in Huawei p40 pro maybe the best on the market, but im looking for a phone, twice cheaper, but with great camera too. After your review between mi note 10 vs hiawei p40 pro, there is only one winner and it is xiaomi mi note 10 if taking a price + camera performance. Question about zoom, you have a video camparing xiaomi mi note 10 vs huawei p30 pro. Is it a big difference between xiaomi mi note 10 and huawei p40 pro using a zoom?? A few days ago xiaomi have a new phone called xiaomi mi 10 youth edition with 5 x perescope zoom + huawei have a new phone honor 30 pro with a perescope 5x zoom. So zoom is important for me, because im using a telescope + phone(xiaomi mi mix2s). And want to change a phone with a god image quality + good zoom. A lot of info about new phones and hard to chose the best for price and camera performance.
Absolutely the best value phone for photography is the mi Note 10
@@lorenzcaptures7492 one more thing, on last video you upload pictures with the moon, can you upload a few conprasions between xiaomi mi note 10 vs huawei p40 pro zoom battle 5x, 10 x and 50 x taking pictures, no moon just daylight photos.
Here I compare their zoom level: th-cam.com/video/tOjk100otJ0/w-d-xo.html
Dedicated 50x zoom battle is coming soon, stay tuned
@@lorenzcaptures7492 ok, counting days 👍
Yes, it was true at the time 🥰🥰
For the moon, whats the best ? Mi note 10 or P30 Pro ?
I made a comparison of only 50x zoom shots (including the moon), click here to watch it: th-cam.com/video/g7PQzZvQJqA/w-d-xo.html
P30 pro is much better
Complimenti per aver raggiunto e superato i 1000 iscritti, è fantastico p40 pro veramente tanta roba, ma per ottenere foto così ovviamente il telefono lo tieni su un treppiedi?
Con pixel 3 tiro fuori scatti bellissimi al buio totale con la modalità notturna e l'astrografia ma uno zoom ottico é un altra cosa rispetto anche al miglior zoom digitale.
Assolutamente p40 pro il miglior cameraphone sul mercato
Ciao! Grazie! Guarda ho fatto tutto a mano libera nel video. Lo stabilizzatore ottico sulla lente zoom di p40pro è davvero ottimo!
I can say only that: WOW!!!!!!! I really want this phone but it hasn't got Google and it cost more than 1000 Euro and it's to much for me xD
Yeah i really wanna go back to huawei but that aint happen untill it gets google back!
My last phone was P30 pro and now i have oneplus 7t pro Mclaren Edition.
Great phone, but the camera doesnt come close to huawei leica camera!
@@MasterPiece-rg7ed yeah but op 7t pro is very good :D. I am thinking about mi note 10 to photography. Is this good choice?
NLachu, I can say that I have installed all GMS in 20-30 minutes and it was easy. They perfectly work!!!
MasterPiece, OnePlus 7t Pro McLaren edition is a gorgeous phone. But cameras are not the point of strength of OnePlus phones😜 (I'm not saying they take bad pictures, but they're a step behind top cameraphones!)
@@lorenzcaptures7492 Really? I don't know it can work good :D thanks for information :D
compare with s20 ultra pls or wait for p40 pro+,i mean the AI on huawei is very nice
I surely would do it, if only company gave me phones for review 😔. For now I have to buy all the phones myself
Could you please take a photo of the moon again and post the dng file (raw) of the moon? Then we could see how much AI enhanced the result.
it's not possible to take a RAW file at 50x zoom
Lorenz Captures Then at 5x or 10x? This isn't an issue because a raw file at 50x would be just a crop anyway. You would only have to make sure that you don't overexpose the moon.
Even the "super resolution" algorithms are not relevant because the P40 Pro's periscope camera suffers from the same amount of diffraction as a 12 megapixel crop of a Canon Aps-c 24 megapixel camera at f/12.6. (√(330.9mm²x(12/24)/12mm²) x 3.4 ≈ 12.6
And I have done an experiment that indicates that at f/13 (with base Iso equivalent exposure time) a higher megapixel count wouldn't lead to more details (Sigma 105mm with same effective aperture diameter as Ef-m 32mm f/13 on a tripod doesn't resolve more details from distant objects). So I would say that in this case a super resolution algorithm is physically impossible regarding Huawei's effective aperture diameter, unless the resolution suffers from noise and from distortion caused by the atmosphere.
So a raw file at 5x could say a lot.
After looking on the moon photo again and again and after comparing it with moon photos from large cameras, the result was likely enhanced in some way. The moon photo looks twodimensional (no details on the edge of the disc) and it resolves several details so well as a Canon M50 + 105mm lens , this should be impossible as the Canon + 105mm lens has four times as many pixels per lunar crater. Some details of the Huawei moon jpg are even noticeably cleaner.
Wow... Ma lore hai abbandonato il mi note 10?!
Ciao! Certo che no! Li sto usando entrambi! Adesso per esempio ti sto rispondendo dal mi note 10 pro😉
Compare with mi note 10
I will make a comparison between P40 PRO and Mi Note 10 Pro only with 50x zoom shots! Stay tuned!👊🏻
Guys, almost two year old Mate 20 pro can do it same way like p40 pro.. Nothing new.
I have mate 20 pro too. I don't think so :)
you do realize that you dont know what youre talking about
Bro: do you know moon shots on new camera phone (P30 PRO, Mi9, etc) are fake? It's the A.I. which superimpose real shot with photo templates...
Are you 100% sure of that? Where's the proof, no one knows the truth. At least you have a good image of the moon!😜
@@lorenzcaptures7492 www.google.com/amp/s/www.androidauthority.com/huawei-p30-pro-moon-mode-controversy-978486/amp/
@@lorenzcaptures7492 don't be ridiculous, that's because of A.I it triggers moon mode, you're a no brainer lol
I have deleted my previous comment. I was sure that Huawei doesn't fake the moon, but I have looked at a translation of the allegation. The arguments seem to be extremely convincing and can't be explained by super resolution algorithms. Huawei denied that they fake the moon (actually they didn't deny it because they didn't deny machine learning zoom, which can do whatever the AI wants), but they didn't comment on the very convincing arguments/proofs. Furthermore I took a moon photo with a Canon M50 with a Sigma 105mm lens at f/8 at Iso 640. Surprisingly the Huawei photo had a similar amount of details and even looked cleaner, although in theory the Canon has an advantage that is comparable to the difference between 2x and 1x zoom. √(11.9mm²/330.9mm²) x(105mm/14.46mm) x √(24megapixels/11.9megapixels) ≈ 1.96 (I didn't take Canon's anti aliasing filter into account, but I also didn't take into account that Huawei's lens suffers a bit from diffraction)
One needs to look at Huawei's dng file.
Lorenz Captures Could you please post a raw photo (dng) of the moon? This would answer the question.