I tried this racket today and was crushing the ball. Forehand and serves were coming off so cleanly and with so much power. Huge fan. Currently v core pro 97 user.
Finally I got the chance to ask how does it compare with Yonex vcp 97D? I’ve been using 97HD for the last two years and plan to buy either the new blade or the new 97D
Both offer a lot control, and feel, but maybe a bit more feel/response from the VCORE 97D, and a bit more solid feeling overall with that 320 gram unstrung weight, compared to the 305. That said, this Blade v8 does feel a bit more maneuverable than before, but then again that will come down the swingweight spec, and the only way to know for certain what the swingweight will be, is to use our MRT services. Maybe just a bit more pop coming the Blade, but the overall power/control level is pretty similar now with these updates, and slightly thicker beam on the 97D compared to 97HD. Troy, TW
@@tenniswarehouse Thanks Troy!! I really like how much spin potential 97HD can generate as a 1820 racquet. I would assume 97D maintain the same spin friendly characteristics. Is the spin potential of blade a lot less than 97D?
@@Rick-ou6wy, yes the string spacing and spin potential has pretty much remained the same with the 97D from 97HD. I would say the Blade is pretty close, maybe a bit less, but fairly close. Troy, TW
Michelle, how you compare this to the speed pro 18x20? Wich is better for talented groundstrokes 2 backhand player looking for control, manueaverability and stability?
@Pro Natural, I need to get the Speed Pro in my hands again to answer this question completely but if I am remembering correctly, I prefer that frame as it feels more solid and stiffer which is what I prefer. I felt a bit more putaway power and more in command of the ball. I'd say as far as maneuverability and stability, they are fairly close and would find similar levels of control as well but lean toward the Speed Pro for my game and personal preferences. Michelle, TW
Hey Troy. I have been playing a lot with the one Blade 18x20 from 2015 that I have left. How does this version compare to the 2015 Blade that is prob my favorite iteration?
This is a nice update, however it feels a bit more maneuverable on average, and although it is lower in stiffness based on the throat flex, it feels a bit more crisp in feel, so maybe a bit firmer in the hoop. Troy, TW
Would you pick up this one over the 16x19? I am very curious about Troy that lately likes more open frames!(i have 18x20 but i struggle a bit in 2hd set) And what about a hybrid set like hyper g in mains and luxilon element in the crosses? (in both patterns)
I think at this point I am giving the slight edge to the 16x19 version. For many years and with previous generations I was always more fond of the the 18x20, as it has a ton of control and feel, and I also felt like there was a bigger gap between the 18x20 and 16x19 in terms of the play-ability, and stability of the racquet. Now with the v8, I have played with both, frequently when they came out, and I like that the 16x19 gives a bit easier access to spin, as well as easier launch angle or lift over the net on groundstrokes. I did add a bit of weight tape to the 3 and 9 o'clock positions on the hoop of the 16x19, to get the swingweight up a bit, but with that I felt like the stability, and play-ability of the racquet, sweet-spot size, was pretty much on par with the 18x20, and I got the benefits of the easier spin and launch angle. Troy, TW
Another question for you guys at TW. Thank you for the advice. I may be ditching the 18x20 string pattern for good to get more spin, but thought I would ask you guys if you know of any spin friendly strings that would help give this racquet the spin I need help generating? Thanks in advance.
If you want to try some spin friendly strings for an 18x20 pattern, I would consider something like Solinco Tour Bite 17 or 18, Solinco Hyper-G 17 or 18, Tecnifibre 4S 18. Troy, TW
How does the Blade V8 18x20 compare to the Wilson Ultra Tour? Spec wise they looks very similar apart from the extra 1 inch headsize and slightly higher swing weight in the Blade? I had the Ultra tour but found it to be a bit lifeless and anemic so hoping this Blade V8 has more in the way of power / spin and stability!? Always liked the Blades and want to go back to them but just want to make sure they haven’t changed the great Blade formula too much. I didn’t hate the Ultra Tour but just want a bit more pop from the racket without having to customise too much. Thanks for any advice.
The main difference would be what you mentioned, specifically that feel of a higher swingweight, and not quite as head light as the Ultra Tour. I also noticed the Ultra Tour to lacks some energy return when I playtested, although the feel is really nice, just felt like it was hard to hit through the court at times, unless you really boost the swingweight. I think you should find a bit more energy return into your shots with the Blade v8 18x20, although it still has a flexible feel, and a lot of control. The Blade v8 doesn't pack as much punch as say the Babolat Pure Strike 18x20 3rd Gen, but it does seem to have a bit more than the Ultra Tour and still pretty good comfort and feel. Troy, TW
Thanks for the reply Troy! Much appreciated. Yes I’ve tried the Babolat Pure Strike and for some reason couldn’t get on with it. I’m glad to hear that the Blade packs a bit more of a punch than the Ultra Tour. Think I’ll make the move back to the Blade line now as they’re the rackets I’ve always gone back to and mostly used throughout my career. Although not sure if to go for the 16x19 or 18x20 Blade? Any thoughts on this? I normally go for 16x19 with the Blades but the lower swing weight has put me off the new V8 so thinking of going for the V8 18x20 because of this. Or would it be a good option to lead up a 16x19 in the head to bring the swing weight up? Don’t tend to lead my rackets so not sure if it’s a good option and if it actually affects the frames performance other than the weight? I hit a very flat 2 handed BH and a pretty heavy semi western grip FH. Have always found the Blades a happy medium on both sides for me and they’re always solid in the volly and serve department. My instinct is telling me to go for the 18x20 and loosen the tension to help my top spin production on my FH while also giving me the option to flatten our and hit through the court. Thanks again for your help and I’m almost at a decision now.
@@taropb, I think it really comes down to whether you prefer to play the racquet in stock or not. The Blade 98 16x19 v8 might need a little bit of added weight in the hoop, to help with power, whereas the 18x20 will have more plow through in stock form. That said the 16x19 blade does make for easier spin generation, and a bit higher launch angle. Also, not sure how particular you are about your specs, and if you keep multiple racquets (of the same frame) in your bag, but sometimes it is ideal to get your racquets measured when purchasing them, as the specs can fluctuate, and over the years we have found a fairly significant variance in swingweight over the years. We do have matching service if you purchase from TW. Troy, TW
Thanks Troy. Yes I always get a pair of rackets and like to play in stock form so think I’ll go for the 18x20 and get a pair matched. I’m based in the UK so any ideas when you’ll have them in stock over here? Thanks for helping me out and I’m looking forward to returning to the Blade line. Was previously using the Head Gravity Pro and it was nice but I just found it a bit clunky to get around. That was 18x20 which I found fine so Blade 18x20 V8 it is. Actually how does the Blade V8 18x20 compare to the Gravity Pro? Last question I promise 😊
@@taropb, not for certain as to when they will be available in the UK, however it looks like we now have them available at TW Europe, our warehouse based in Germany. The Blade V8 18x20 doesn't quite feel as hefty, especially if you are getting the specs checked and hopefully can find that swingweight a little below 330. I also found maybe just a bit more pop with the Blade v8, maybe it is just that slightly thicker beam. The Gravity Pro feels heftier to maneuver, and that slightly thinner beam provides provides slightly more feel, although both offer a lot of control and feel for the ball. I find the 98 headsize of the Blade gives a bit more precision. Troy, TW
Close to the Gravity Pro in that there is a lot of control, feel, and has a softer flex to it, providing great arm comfort. The Pure Strike Tour 3rd Gen is stiffer feeling, and provides a bit easier power and spin. Troy, TW
In regards to feel, this Blade and the TF40 305 are both really good, and the Strike 18x20 is a bit stiffer, and a bit less feel for the ball, but still very solid. This Blade v8 18x20 and TF40 305 are pretty close in power, maybe just slightly more from the TF40, but it is pretty close. Spin is pretty close between the three, but I think it might come down to maneuverability for some players, just based on how fast they can whip the racquet through contact, consistently over time. The TF40 305 feels slightly more maneuverable, then the Blade v8 18x20 a bit heftier, and the Strike 18x20 feeling the heaviest, and most plow. Troy, TW
Hey Troy. Great review. I recently switched to this v8 18x20 blade after using the head extreme tour for 2 years. I loved the tour for control and spin with easy power, but I found I always had to customize it like crazy to be playable, it had a lot of vibrations felt in the wrist, especially off center shots, and sometimes the ball would go erratic when trying to hit down the line. I play with a lot of spin naturally and still get good spin with this 18x20 but more left right control. I do feel it has good power but a bit less pop and spin than extreme tour. I like soft thin poly and don’t break strings often. Currently poly tour pro 120 , 49 m 47 cross. Seems to play well. Thoughts on ideal setup for me? I love spin game but wanted to dial it in a bit more. Thoughts on lower tension? How many pounds lower should I make the crosses vs mains tension? Thanks so much.
Thanks for your feedback. I think that your current string setup is pretty legit. As far as the difference in tension between mains and crosses, it really is a personal preference thing, but I probably wouldn't recommend going more than a 3 to 4 pound difference, as going more than that can cause unwanted or an imbalance stress to the hoop. If you are maybe looking to experiment with other polys, I remember being fond of the Kirschbaum Xplosive Speed, having a fairly comfortable lively feel to it, and it also comes in 18 or 1.20. Volkl Cyclone Tour is a pretty good option as well, that comes in 18 1.20. You could try a lower tension, however it will have to come down to experimenting, so if you are interested maybe try gradually going down like a pound or so with each re-string. I sometimes can go lower in tension like in lower 40 range but it is usually with stiffer polys, and the string spacing of the racquet plays a big part, so maybe experiment to see what feels best for you; but it sounds like you have something that works pretty well for you now. Troy, TW
Thanks for the feedback. I feel like the 49ish tension with 1.20 poly tour Prol helps balance out lack of spin from 18x20 pattern. But I also feel like with this racquet what you put into it is what you get out. So if you hit with lots of spin mechanically, at most, it just keeps it dialled in.
Awesome and detailed review, thanks ! I used to be a Blade V6 CV 18x20 user and loved it but moved on (that was a mistake). I'm thinking of coming back to the blade line; could I enjoy this version compared to the v6 ?
Yes, we enjoy playing this version just as much or more than the v7 or v6 Blade 98 18x20. If you want to try something else, or demo some racquets, the Tecnifibre TF40 305 (18x20) is a great one as well. Troy, TW
@@tenniswarehouse Thanks for the quick response and the recommendation Troy ! Will definitely try both of them as well as the new speed pro. Quick last question, do you feel that the V8 has less plow through than the v6 ? Thanks again !
So for me, it basically comes down to getting the specs dialed-in for both versions. That said, if I were to have both racquets matched to my prefer specs, I would likely go with the v8 16x19 version, mainly because I like the little extra bite and spin I can get from the 16x19 pattern, as that is more of what I am used to nowadays. Ask me about five years ago and it was more of an easy, no-brainer, that I would have chose 18x20 as that is all I used to play with. If someone was playing them in stock form, they might find a bit more plow through and stability from the 18x20 due to the higher average swingweight, but it will be the hard to say for certain, as I have seen quite fluctuation in that spec. So that is why I find a swingweight in our stock closest to about 330 strung, or just customize both to that desired spec. Troy, TW
Looks like the new Wilson Blades are very similar to the Prince Phantom line. I'm not sure that bodes well, even with the new cosmetic and new grip handle tech.
Great review again! Thank you 😇 this may sound like a strange question, but one thing I've found since switching to Wilson is that I generate too much topspin on the ball on my forehand. As in, I find it extremely difficult to hit a flat forehand and when I get tired, I struggle to hit the ball deep. I am working on my technique all the time to create a flat shot, but are there any rackets that maybe lend themselves to a flatter strike? Or rackets that make it easier to generate less topspin?
@Joel Byrd, I would be curious to find out what racquets you are using that have been the culprit as I wouldn't say it is Wilson persay but maybe the racquets you are trying. Denser string patterns like this one, the 18x20, will make it tougher to generate as much spin as a more open string pattern like a 16x19. Wilson has also had some "spin effect" racquets with wide open string patterns that really help generate more movement on the ball. The weight of the racquet can play a role as well since a lighter racquet might swing faster and easier for you and a heavier racquet would be tougher to accelerate through. If you have specific racquet examples, we'd be happy to discuss this further! Michelle, TW
@@tenniswarehouse Hi Michelle - thanks for the reply! Really appreciate your thoughts. For a while I've been using the RF Autograph 97. On the backhand side (2 handed), I can generate hard, flat shots throughout matches very comfortably, but on the forehand I think I'm finding that the racket is too heavy for me to accelerate through the ball. As I get more tired (say 90 minutes in a match), my technique begins to compensate for the tiredness and I brush the ball too much. Before the RF97, I used a much older Wilson BLX Tour model for several years which I think was 16x20? The problem was a bit less apparent with this racket. I think technique is certainly the bigger issue and I will continue to work on it, but if there is a racket that is more suitable for generating a natural flat hit without the extra spin, I'd be interested to try something new. I'm certainly not expecting any magical quick fixes! XD
@Joel Byrd, As an RF97 user and flatter hitter, I don't find the racquet to be too "spinny" if that makes sense, but also can see a 16x19 string pattern offering more spin and maybe a racquet with a tighter pattern might be a good way to go like an 18x20 -- you can try this within the Wilson brand or move to another brand. I have found some 18x20s to feel too low powered and tight but some that I've been enjoying would include the newer Yonex VCORE Pro 97D as well as the Dunlop CX 200 Tour 18x20 and even the Head Speed Pro! Would love to hear if you grab a demo of a tighter patterned racquet if it helps sort the issue out! Michelle, TW
It seemed like the torsional stability was a bit better, and maybe just slightly more stable on off center contact. Not sure if it is a layup thing, or partially due to the way the handle is constructed. That said, the v7 felt solid and stable as well, just maybe a slight increase on that. Overall, a really good feel on this one. Troy, TW
@@jorgeandrescoppiano, Hey there. Not for certain exactly on how they achieved it, but that could definitely be an option, by making the sides of the hoop a bit more dense. Sort of perimeter weighting, or increasing the twistweight in the layup. Wilson also claims that the Direct Connect handle, which connects the butt cap directly to the core of the handle, not the foam material that usually makes the pallet, increases torsional stability. Troy, TW
I keep coming back to my V7's 18x20 Blades. After this stick being out for almost a year would you say the swingweight is lower? Do you have any comps with the V7's you noticed?
Even after having stock on these racquets for a while, and doing a lot of racquet matching and spec taking, swingweight is tough to really dictate a trend; especially since most brands don't have a target spec for swingweight. There was time when it seemed like the swingweights were noticeably coming in lower with the v8 18x20, and the average is still likely a bit lower overall, as the spec table reflects, however there will still be fluctuation, high and low when it comes to swingweight. That is why we recommend using or mrt spec services. When you say comps, do you mean complaints? Troy, TW
@@tenniswarehouse thanks for the detailed answer. By comps I would say comparison and contrast between the two, besides the new paint job which I love.
@@theroadie08, I get you. As far as comparisons go, it was a slight difference in feel, and with the racquets we tested they did feel a bit more maneuverable compared to the v7. The v8 has a handle technology that is designed to increase the torsional stability, and the feel on contact is maybe just a bit more firm and crisp, even though it is still an overall flexible racquet. The feel of the v7 was slightly softer overall and a bit more dampened, and very very plush. So overall we liked the v8 update, although the v7 is very nice as well, and often times it is more about what the player gets used, especially if you have been using it for a while. Troy, TW
Hi, I’m looking to switch frames from a vcore 95 (2018). So far I’m stuck between the blade and strike 18x20 so just wondering how they compare with each other and which should be an easier switch for me?
I guess it depends on how much of a difference you would like. I think the Blade 98 18x20 v8 will be a slightly easier transition, control wise, and maybe maneuverability wise as well. If you wanted a more noticeable boost in power, and don't mind a slightly stiffer feel, and slightly more hefty feel then the Strike 18x20 3rd gen could be a good choice. If you are serious about finding the right specs, and about your game, it might be beneficial to try and get specs of your current VCORE 95 (weight, balance, and especially swingweight). In which that information could be very helpful, if purchasing a racquet through us, as we could go through our stock and try to find some specs that are as close as possible, especially swingweight because that can fluctuate a lot, and is the most noticeable spec when you are actually playing. Troy, TW
Do you guys prefer this over the v7 18x20? I have a v7 18x20 and wanted to get a second, but unfortunately none are available in my size and I don’t know when/if they will be restocked. Hence I’m thinking of getting this one instead….
@A C, Agh yea, boo! Hah - I was going to say, depends on who you ask re: v7 vs. v8 -- I personally prefer the v7, but some of the playtesters preferred the v8 which has a bit more flexible and has b=more feel and a little lower of a swingweight. Not drastically different, so should be an easy transition if you decide to go with the update. Michelle, TW
@Dario Schmidt, Are you referring to our scores on the racquets or the actual RA numbers? The Blade 98 18x20 is one point more flexible based on the average specs we took of these racquets. As for our scoring, there are often times different playtesters on the reviews and the scores can't be directly compared based on differing experiences and opinions. As always, we recommend taking our comments and scores with a grain of salt and applying it to how it would apply to you, your game and what gear you normally gravitate toward! Hope that helps! Michelle, TW
The overall feel on contact, and flex of the frame is very similar overall. That said, the 18x20 feels slightly more solid and stable in stock form and feels a bit better on flatter drives and slice shots. The 16x19 is a bit more maneuverable feeling, and as most would expect from the string pattern, it makes for easier topspin, and an easier launch angle. Troy, TW
@tennis warehouse Thanks for the great review! Always first and best reviews. Currently i’m playing with Vcore Pro 97 310(2021). How is the blade compared to the vcore pro in terms of comfort control feel and manuverability? I know both are low powered which is great for me… and vcore pro has better spin potential. Thanks!!
Comfort and feel is very good with both, comfort pretty close to equal, and a lot of feel for the ball with both, although which feels better is somewhat subjective to the player. Control is a bit better with the Blade 98 18x20 v8, just because of the tighter string pattern. Maneuverability is a bit easier with the VCORE Pro 97 310 (2021), although the 16x19 version of the blade is closer in maneuverability to the VCORE Pro 97 310 (2021). Troy, TW
The Blade 98 18x20v8 has more control, precision, stability and plow through. The Pro Staff 97L is more maneuverable, a bit easier power, and more spin friendly. Troy, TW
Really like te review and thinking of switching to a blade 98 again. I currently use the blade 93 from 2013 with volkl cyclone strung around 57 lbs. With that setup I am able to hit a hard flat ball, without having to fear the ball will be going long. I am looking for a slightly bigger head size and a more forgiving frame with a slightly bigger sweet spot. I was thinking of testing a TF T-fight 315RS, the new Wilson blade 98 18x20, Wilson clash 98, head gravity pro, prince textreme 95. What do you reckon? Do you have any other options I could try?
I believe I tried to explain this to you previously when talking about the Pure Strike 18x20, although that one was an increase in SW. My example was the old AeroPro GT (2010) to the 2013 AeroPro Drive, where there was a decrease in SW by about 15 points. That said, the SW should be thought about more in terms of overall material distribution, and not so much just by the final balance point number. For example, in theory you could achieve an EVEN balance (right at the halfway distance) by placing half the overall weight at the tip and other half at the bottom of the handle (leaving a little weight for the filler in-between). You could also make the same EVEN balance by placing small increments of the weight at every inch, along the 27 inch long racquet. These two distributions have the same EVEN balance, but SW will be much different, because the racquet with half the mass at the tip, will make for a much higher SW. Hope that helps. Troy, TW
@@tenniswarehouse Hey Troy, Really appreciate your answer and taking the time as always. You've been in the Blade 98 playtests since the K Blade playtests almost a decade ago so it means a lot. I have a KBlade and a 2015, would be interesting to know which versions were your favourite or perhaps top 3 favourite versions? Also when you were playing with the Blade were you using the 16*19 or the 18*20? Thanks Troy
So with this 18x20 v8 we found it to feel slightly more maneuverable in stock form, and also provides a little more ball feedback, or responsiveness as we like to say. It also felt slightly more stable on off-center hits. The v7 18x20 felt like it carried a bit more heft or swingweight, and felt a bit more flexible in the hoop of the racquet. That said, when it comes to maneuverability, swingweight is a huge factor, and in order to guarantee a swingweight number when buying a new racquet, a service like our MRT matching needs to be done. If picking a frame at random from our warehouse, the specs can vary. Troy, TW
We will post the written review as soon as it is ready and through all of the editing. Typically, the written review will get posted around a month or so from when the video review is made available. Troy, TW
The TF40 305 feels like it offers a bit more energy return, and feels slightly more maneuverable. The Blade 98 18x20 v8 feels a bit lower in power, and feels slightly heavier to maneuver. Troy, TW
Is there something to find in this model if you really love the Rf97 ? I'm including here of course the 16x19 one as well. I've never hit with the Blade before
If you really love the heft of the RF97 Autograph, I think you could potentially find either the 16x19 or 18x20 to work, but would need to weight them up close to the hefty specs of the RF97A. That said, if the stiffer feel on contact is what draws into the RF97A, these Blades might not be your cup of tea, as they are quite a bit softer and more plush, but on the plus side that does lend to some added comfort on the arms. Troy, TW
@@tenniswarehouse Thanks for your swift reply. Well, I actually switched to the Rf97, coming from the Babolat aero pro drive cortex version, so that's quite a change :)) I do like to hit with the Rf97 though, even if I find that I shank the ball more often than I used to with the Babolat ( I would say Federer esque shanks lol) but I'm quite satisfied once I hit heavy balls with it, plus the stability coming up to the net. That's one reason I switched to the Rf97 and the other reason being its weight and plow through when absorbing the ball from heavy hitters. I found myself with the Babolat to unstable to hit back a very heavy ball and made me shank those type of balls. The Rf97 does feel like an indestructible tank when the ball is being hit and the ball would be like a small mini cooper car lol. I suppose I wouldn't get this feeling from a Blade, right ?
They are Stance socks, but Sage said that he got them a few years back. You can look for similar styles on the Stance socks website, or we have some Stance socks at our sister company, www.skatewarehouse.com/Stance_Socks/catpage-STANCESOCKS.html. Troy, TW
Although the manufacturer specifications are the same for both models in terms of weight and balance, the extra strings on the stringbed from the 18x20 model will add more swingweight. -Andrew, TW
Furthermore, it can also have to do with the overall distribution of mass throughout the length of the racquet. In this case there is slight difference in the average balance, but also just where the weight might be slightly more concentrated in the frame. Yes, the 18x20 has three more strings total (two mains, and one cross), but the 7 point average difference between the two racquets, accounts for more than just three strings. Hope that helps. Troy, TW
Both are very solid feeling racquets, with fairly similar specs. I think the main difference really comes down to feel, and a slight difference in the grip/pallet shape. The TF40 305 18x20 (2nd gen) is a bit more firm, so for me I noticed a bit more pop or energy return, and is like a nice borderline of feeling solid and firm, but still decently comfortable. The Blade 98 18x20 v8 is a bit softer, and slightly more comfortable, and maybe just a slight bit less power or energy return. Both swing fairly hefty for 305 gram unstrung racquets. Troy, TW
Wilson hasn't released a Blade 93 in quite a few years. Not for certain, but it seems like a lot of brands feel like the mid-size racquets are not as relevant for the modern game. The Prince Phantom 93P is a great choice for a midsize, www.tennis-warehouse.com/Prince_Phantom_Racquets/catpage-PRINPHAN.html. Troy, TW
@AJ, Hah, don't know if that is what I said, but, the Blades have never been for me! Liked the previous version best and ok with passing on this update! Michelle, TW
I tried this racket today and was crushing the ball. Forehand and serves were coming off so cleanly and with so much power. Huge fan. Currently v core pro 97 user.
Nice! Sounds like it is time for a switch!!!
Michelle, TW
The paint job on the Blade v8 is absolutey sick. This is the best looking paint job on any racquet I've ever seen.
The color changes from green to brown in sunlight ✨️.
it looks like a snake
From what Troy is saying, they've definitely upped the hoop stiffness which is an absolute Pass from me.
Thanks for the detailed review.
Blade 18x20 the 2015 version continues to be the absolute best blade ever released
Big fan of the all black and gray darth vaded one
Troy's one handed backhand 🤩
I demoed Blade v7 against TF40 305 and went with the TF40. This update looks like it would be even closer to the TF40, but happy with my choice.
isTF40 more powerful?
Finally I got the chance to ask how does it compare with Yonex vcp 97D? I’ve been using 97HD for the last two years and plan to buy either the new blade or the new 97D
Wilson labs has the blade h19 and h22 pro sticks niw available to public...have you looked inti them?
Both offer a lot control, and feel, but maybe a bit more feel/response from the VCORE 97D, and a bit more solid feeling overall with that 320 gram unstrung weight, compared to the 305. That said, this Blade v8 does feel a bit more maneuverable than before, but then again that will come down the swingweight spec, and the only way to know for certain what the swingweight will be, is to use our MRT services. Maybe just a bit more pop coming the Blade, but the overall power/control level is pretty similar now with these updates, and slightly thicker beam on the 97D compared to 97HD. Troy, TW
@@tenniswarehouse Thanks Troy!! I really like how much spin potential 97HD can generate as a 1820 racquet. I would assume 97D maintain the same spin friendly characteristics. Is the spin potential of blade a lot less than 97D?
@@Rick-ou6wy, yes the string spacing and spin potential has pretty much remained the same with the 97D from 97HD. I would say the Blade is pretty close, maybe a bit less, but fairly close. Troy, TW
@@mteca5093 Are they available outside US?
This and the new vcore pro are the sexiest rackets out. The colors on these is unbelievable
Michelle, how you compare this to the speed pro 18x20? Wich is better for talented groundstrokes 2 backhand player looking for control, manueaverability and stability?
@Pro Natural,
I need to get the Speed Pro in my hands again to answer this question completely but if I am remembering correctly, I prefer that frame as it feels more solid and stiffer which is what I prefer. I felt a bit more putaway power and more in command of the ball. I'd say as far as maneuverability and stability, they are fairly close and would find similar levels of control as well but lean toward the Speed Pro for my game and personal preferences.
Michelle, TW
Hey Troy. I have been playing a lot with the one Blade 18x20 from 2015 that I have left. How does this version compare to the 2015 Blade that is prob my favorite iteration?
This is a nice update, however it feels a bit more maneuverable on average, and although it is lower in stiffness based on the throat flex, it feels a bit more crisp in feel, so maybe a bit firmer in the hoop. Troy, TW
The look is amazing but, how does it work compare with a RF97 autograph?
This Blade 98 18x20 offers a bit more control, flexible feel, and comfort on the arms. Troy, TW
@@tenniswarehouse Thanks Troy, I guess losing some stability isn't it?
Would you pick up this one over the 16x19? I am very curious about Troy that lately likes more open frames!(i have 18x20 but i struggle a bit in 2hd set)
And what about a hybrid set like hyper g in mains and luxilon element in the crosses? (in both patterns)
I think at this point I am giving the slight edge to the 16x19 version. For many years and with previous generations I was always more fond of the the 18x20, as it has a ton of control and feel, and I also felt like there was a bigger gap between the 18x20 and 16x19 in terms of the play-ability, and stability of the racquet. Now with the v8, I have played with both, frequently when they came out, and I like that the 16x19 gives a bit easier access to spin, as well as easier launch angle or lift over the net on groundstrokes. I did add a bit of weight tape to the 3 and 9 o'clock positions on the hoop of the 16x19, to get the swingweight up a bit, but with that I felt like the stability, and play-ability of the racquet, sweet-spot size, was pretty much on par with the 18x20, and I got the benefits of the easier spin and launch angle. Troy, TW
Long awaited review!
Another question for you guys at TW. Thank you for the advice. I may be ditching the 18x20 string pattern for good to get more spin, but thought I would ask you guys if you know of any spin friendly strings that would help give this racquet the spin I need help generating? Thanks in advance.
If you want to try some spin friendly strings for an 18x20 pattern, I would consider something like Solinco Tour Bite 17 or 18, Solinco Hyper-G 17 or 18, Tecnifibre 4S 18. Troy, TW
How does the Blade V8 18x20 compare to the Wilson Ultra Tour? Spec wise they looks very similar apart from the extra 1 inch headsize and slightly higher swing weight in the Blade? I had the Ultra tour but found it to be a bit lifeless and anemic so hoping this Blade V8 has more in the way of power / spin and stability!? Always liked the Blades and want to go back to them but just want to make sure they haven’t changed the great Blade formula too much. I didn’t hate the Ultra Tour but just want a bit more pop from the racket without having to customise too much. Thanks for any advice.
The main difference would be what you mentioned, specifically that feel of a higher swingweight, and not quite as head light as the Ultra Tour. I also noticed the Ultra Tour to lacks some energy return when I playtested, although the feel is really nice, just felt like it was hard to hit through the court at times, unless you really boost the swingweight. I think you should find a bit more energy return into your shots with the Blade v8 18x20, although it still has a flexible feel, and a lot of control. The Blade v8 doesn't pack as much punch as say the Babolat Pure Strike 18x20 3rd Gen, but it does seem to have a bit more than the Ultra Tour and still pretty good comfort and feel. Troy, TW
Thanks for the reply Troy! Much appreciated. Yes I’ve tried the Babolat Pure Strike and for some reason couldn’t get on with it. I’m glad to hear that the Blade packs a bit more of a punch than the Ultra Tour. Think I’ll make the move back to the Blade line now as they’re the rackets I’ve always gone back to and mostly used throughout my career. Although not sure if to go for the 16x19 or 18x20 Blade? Any thoughts on this? I normally go for 16x19 with the Blades but the lower swing weight has put me off the new V8 so thinking of going for the V8 18x20 because of this. Or would it be a good option to lead up a 16x19 in the head to bring the swing weight up? Don’t tend to lead my rackets so not sure if it’s a good option and if it actually affects the frames performance other than the weight? I hit a very flat 2 handed BH and a pretty heavy semi western grip FH. Have always found the Blades a happy medium on both sides for me and they’re always solid in the volly and serve department. My instinct is telling me to go for the 18x20 and loosen the tension to help my top spin production on my FH while also giving me the option to flatten our and hit through the court. Thanks again for your help and I’m almost at a decision now.
@@taropb, I think it really comes down to whether you prefer to play the racquet in stock or not. The Blade 98 16x19 v8 might need a little bit of added weight in the hoop, to help with power, whereas the 18x20 will have more plow through in stock form. That said the 16x19 blade does make for easier spin generation, and a bit higher launch angle. Also, not sure how particular you are about your specs, and if you keep multiple racquets (of the same frame) in your bag, but sometimes it is ideal to get your racquets measured when purchasing them, as the specs can fluctuate, and over the years we have found a fairly significant variance in swingweight over the years. We do have matching service if you purchase from TW. Troy, TW
Thanks Troy. Yes I always get a pair of rackets and like to play in stock form so think I’ll go for the 18x20 and get a pair matched. I’m based in the UK so any ideas when you’ll have them in stock over here? Thanks for helping me out and I’m looking forward to returning to the Blade line. Was previously using the Head Gravity Pro and it was nice but I just found it a bit clunky to get around. That was 18x20 which I found fine so Blade 18x20 V8 it is. Actually how does the Blade V8 18x20 compare to the Gravity Pro? Last question I promise 😊
@@taropb, not for certain as to when they will be available in the UK, however it looks like we now have them available at TW Europe, our warehouse based in Germany. The Blade V8 18x20 doesn't quite feel as hefty, especially if you are getting the specs checked and hopefully can find that swingweight a little below 330. I also found maybe just a bit more pop with the Blade v8, maybe it is just that slightly thicker beam. The Gravity Pro feels heftier to maneuver, and that slightly thinner beam provides provides slightly more feel, although both offer a lot of control and feel for the ball. I find the 98 headsize of the Blade gives a bit more precision. Troy, TW
Hi TW,
how does this iteration of the Blade compare to rackets like the Pure Strike Tour and Gravity Pro?
Thank you.
Close to the Gravity Pro in that there is a lot of control, feel, and has a softer flex to it, providing great arm comfort. The Pure Strike Tour 3rd Gen is stiffer feeling, and provides a bit easier power and spin. Troy, TW
How does this compared to Tecnifibre Tf40 305 and Pure Strike 18x20 in term of feel, power and spin?
In regards to feel, this Blade and the TF40 305 are both really good, and the Strike 18x20 is a bit stiffer, and a bit less feel for the ball, but still very solid. This Blade v8 18x20 and TF40 305 are pretty close in power, maybe just slightly more from the TF40, but it is pretty close. Spin is pretty close between the three, but I think it might come down to maneuverability for some players, just based on how fast they can whip the racquet through contact, consistently over time. The TF40 305 feels slightly more maneuverable, then the Blade v8 18x20 a bit heftier, and the Strike 18x20 feeling the heaviest, and most plow. Troy, TW
Hey Troy. Great review. I recently switched to this v8 18x20 blade after using the head extreme tour for 2 years. I loved the tour for control and spin with easy power, but I found I always had to customize it like crazy to be playable, it had a lot of vibrations felt in the wrist, especially off center shots, and sometimes the ball would go erratic when trying to hit down the line. I play with a lot of spin naturally and still get good spin with this 18x20 but more left right control. I do feel it has good power but a bit less pop and spin than extreme tour. I like soft thin poly and don’t break strings often. Currently poly tour pro 120 , 49 m 47 cross. Seems to play well. Thoughts on ideal setup for me? I love spin game but wanted to dial it in a bit more. Thoughts on lower tension? How many pounds lower should I make the crosses vs mains tension? Thanks so much.
Thanks for your feedback. I think that your current string setup is pretty legit. As far as the difference in tension between mains and crosses, it really is a personal preference thing, but I probably wouldn't recommend going more than a 3 to 4 pound difference, as going more than that can cause unwanted or an imbalance stress to the hoop. If you are maybe looking to experiment with other polys, I remember being fond of the Kirschbaum Xplosive Speed, having a fairly comfortable lively feel to it, and it also comes in 18 or 1.20. Volkl Cyclone Tour is a pretty good option as well, that comes in 18 1.20. You could try a lower tension, however it will have to come down to experimenting, so if you are interested maybe try gradually going down like a pound or so with each re-string. I sometimes can go lower in tension like in lower 40 range but it is usually with stiffer polys, and the string spacing of the racquet plays a big part, so maybe experiment to see what feels best for you; but it sounds like you have something that works pretty well for you now. Troy, TW
Thanks for the feedback. I feel like the 49ish tension with 1.20 poly tour Prol helps balance out lack of spin from 18x20 pattern. But I also feel like with this racquet what you put into it is what you get out. So if you hit with lots of spin mechanically, at most, it just keeps it dialled in.
Will keep in mind those other string options. I loved confidentail 125 but found it too stiff. Never tried their thinner gauges.
Awesome and detailed review, thanks ! I used to be a Blade V6 CV 18x20 user and loved it but moved on (that was a mistake). I'm thinking of coming back to the blade line; could I enjoy this version compared to the v6 ?
Yes, we enjoy playing this version just as much or more than the v7 or v6 Blade 98 18x20. If you want to try something else, or demo some racquets, the Tecnifibre TF40 305 (18x20) is a great one as well. Troy, TW
@@tenniswarehouse Thanks for the quick response and the recommendation Troy ! Will definitely try both of them as well as the new speed pro. Quick last question, do you feel that the V8 has less plow through than the v6 ? Thanks again !
Hi troy, I'm stuck thinking between blade 98 v8 18x20 vs 16x19. What should I buy? Badly needed your suggestion. Thanks troy
So for me, it basically comes down to getting the specs dialed-in for both versions. That said, if I were to have both racquets matched to my prefer specs, I would likely go with the v8 16x19 version, mainly because I like the little extra bite and spin I can get from the 16x19 pattern, as that is more of what I am used to nowadays. Ask me about five years ago and it was more of an easy, no-brainer, that I would have chose 18x20 as that is all I used to play with. If someone was playing them in stock form, they might find a bit more plow through and stability from the 18x20 due to the higher average swingweight, but it will be the hard to say for certain, as I have seen quite fluctuation in that spec. So that is why I find a swingweight in our stock closest to about 330 strung, or just customize both to that desired spec. Troy, TW
Looks like the new Wilson Blades are very similar to the Prince Phantom line. I'm not sure that bodes well, even with the new cosmetic and new grip handle tech.
Great review again! Thank you 😇 this may sound like a strange question, but one thing I've found since switching to Wilson is that I generate too much topspin on the ball on my forehand. As in, I find it extremely difficult to hit a flat forehand and when I get tired, I struggle to hit the ball deep. I am working on my technique all the time to create a flat shot, but are there any rackets that maybe lend themselves to a flatter strike? Or rackets that make it easier to generate less topspin?
@Joel Byrd,
I would be curious to find out what racquets you are using that have been the culprit as I wouldn't say it is Wilson persay but maybe the racquets you are trying. Denser string patterns like this one, the 18x20, will make it tougher to generate as much spin as a more open string pattern like a 16x19. Wilson has also had some "spin effect" racquets with wide open string patterns that really help generate more movement on the ball. The weight of the racquet can play a role as well since a lighter racquet might swing faster and easier for you and a heavier racquet would be tougher to accelerate through. If you have specific racquet examples, we'd be happy to discuss this further!
Michelle, TW
@@tenniswarehouse Hi Michelle - thanks for the reply! Really appreciate your thoughts.
For a while I've been using the RF Autograph 97. On the backhand side (2 handed), I can generate hard, flat shots throughout matches very comfortably, but on the forehand I think I'm finding that the racket is too heavy for me to accelerate through the ball. As I get more tired (say 90 minutes in a match), my technique begins to compensate for the tiredness and I brush the ball too much. Before the RF97, I used a much older Wilson BLX Tour model for several years which I think was 16x20? The problem was a bit less apparent with this racket. I think technique is certainly the bigger issue and I will continue to work on it, but if there is a racket that is more suitable for generating a natural flat hit without the extra spin, I'd be interested to try something new. I'm certainly not expecting any magical quick fixes! XD
@Joel Byrd,
As an RF97 user and flatter hitter, I don't find the racquet to be too "spinny" if that makes sense, but also can see a 16x19 string pattern offering more spin and maybe a racquet with a tighter pattern might be a good way to go like an 18x20 -- you can try this within the Wilson brand or move to another brand. I have found some 18x20s to feel too low powered and tight but some that I've been enjoying would include the newer Yonex VCORE Pro 97D as well as the Dunlop CX 200 Tour 18x20 and even the Head Speed Pro! Would love to hear if you grab a demo of a tighter patterned racquet if it helps sort the issue out!
Michelle, TW
Hi tw, how can the new blade be more stable with lower swingweight and identical balance?
It seemed like the torsional stability was a bit better, and maybe just slightly more stable on off center contact. Not sure if it is a layup thing, or partially due to the way the handle is constructed. That said, the v7 felt solid and stable as well, just maybe a slight increase on that. Overall, a really good feel on this one. Troy, TW
@@tenniswarehouse hello Troy!! Hope all is very well! So more graphite at 3-9 and less at 12? A little less polarized
@@jorgeandrescoppiano, Hey there. Not for certain exactly on how they achieved it, but that could definitely be an option, by making the sides of the hoop a bit more dense. Sort of perimeter weighting, or increasing the twistweight in the layup. Wilson also claims that the Direct Connect handle, which connects the butt cap directly to the core of the handle, not the foam material that usually makes the pallet, increases torsional stability. Troy, TW
@@tenniswarehousethanks Troy!
@@tenniswarehouse Hi Troy, would that stop one opening the buttcap to put some weight in? Cheers.
I keep coming back to my V7's 18x20 Blades. After this stick being out for almost a year would you say the swingweight is lower? Do you have any comps with the V7's you noticed?
Even after having stock on these racquets for a while, and doing a lot of racquet matching and spec taking, swingweight is tough to really dictate a trend; especially since most brands don't have a target spec for swingweight. There was time when it seemed like the swingweights were noticeably coming in lower with the v8 18x20, and the average is still likely a bit lower overall, as the spec table reflects, however there will still be fluctuation, high and low when it comes to swingweight. That is why we recommend using or mrt spec services. When you say comps, do you mean complaints? Troy, TW
@@tenniswarehouse thanks for the detailed answer. By comps I would say comparison and contrast between the two, besides the new paint job which I love.
@@theroadie08, I get you. As far as comparisons go, it was a slight difference in feel, and with the racquets we tested they did feel a bit more maneuverable compared to the v7. The v8 has a handle technology that is designed to increase the torsional stability, and the feel on contact is maybe just a bit more firm and crisp, even though it is still an overall flexible racquet. The feel of the v7 was slightly softer overall and a bit more dampened, and very very plush. So overall we liked the v8 update, although the v7 is very nice as well, and often times it is more about what the player gets used, especially if you have been using it for a while. Troy, TW
Hi, I’m looking to switch frames from a vcore 95 (2018). So far I’m stuck between the blade and strike 18x20 so just wondering how they compare with each other and which should be an easier switch for me?
I guess it depends on how much of a difference you would like. I think the Blade 98 18x20 v8 will be a slightly easier transition, control wise, and maybe maneuverability wise as well. If you wanted a more noticeable boost in power, and don't mind a slightly stiffer feel, and slightly more hefty feel then the Strike 18x20 3rd gen could be a good choice. If you are serious about finding the right specs, and about your game, it might be beneficial to try and get specs of your current VCORE 95 (weight, balance, and especially swingweight). In which that information could be very helpful, if purchasing a racquet through us, as we could go through our stock and try to find some specs that are as close as possible, especially swingweight because that can fluctuate a lot, and is the most noticeable spec when you are actually playing. Troy, TW
Michelle's backhand tho 😍
Do you guys prefer this over the v7 18x20? I have a v7 18x20 and wanted to get a second, but unfortunately none are available in my size and I don’t know when/if they will be restocked. Hence I’m thinking of getting this one instead….
@A C,
Wondering where you are shopping as we have a full grip size run at Tennis Warehouse ;)
Michelle, TW
@@tenniswarehouse tennis warehouse Europe actually hahahah. They only have size 1 available… :/
@A C,
Agh yea, boo! Hah - I was going to say, depends on who you ask re: v7 vs. v8 -- I personally prefer the v7, but some of the playtesters preferred the v8 which has a bit more flexible and has b=more feel and a little lower of a swingweight. Not drastically different, so should be an easy transition if you decide to go with the update.
Michelle, TW
Hi TW,
Why has this Blade a better armcomfort score as the Blade 16x19?
@Dario Schmidt,
Are you referring to our scores on the racquets or the actual RA numbers? The Blade 98 18x20 is one point more flexible based on the average specs we took of these racquets. As for our scoring, there are often times different playtesters on the reviews and the scores can't be directly compared based on differing experiences and opinions. As always, we recommend taking our comments and scores with a grain of salt and applying it to how it would apply to you, your game and what gear you normally gravitate toward! Hope that helps!
Michelle, TW
This may have been asked already but how does the v8 18x20 compare to the v8 16x19 blade?!
The overall feel on contact, and flex of the frame is very similar overall. That said, the 18x20 feels slightly more solid and stable in stock form and feels a bit better on flatter drives and slice shots. The 16x19 is a bit more maneuverable feeling, and as most would expect from the string pattern, it makes for easier topspin, and an easier launch angle. Troy, TW
@tennis warehouse
Thanks for the great review! Always first and best reviews.
Currently i’m playing with Vcore Pro 97 310(2021).
How is the blade compared to the vcore pro in terms of comfort control feel and manuverability?
I know both are low powered which is great for me… and vcore pro has better spin potential.
Thanks!!
Comfort and feel is very good with both, comfort pretty close to equal, and a lot of feel for the ball with both, although which feels better is somewhat subjective to the player. Control is a bit better with the Blade 98 18x20 v8, just because of the tighter string pattern. Maneuverability is a bit easier with the VCORE Pro 97 310 (2021), although the 16x19 version of the blade is closer in maneuverability to the VCORE Pro 97 310 (2021). Troy, TW
How would you compare this one with ps97l v14 interms of power , comfort n precision?
The Blade 98 18x20v8 has more control, precision, stability and plow through. The Pro Staff 97L is more maneuverable, a bit easier power, and more spin friendly. Troy, TW
Really like te review and thinking of switching to a blade 98 again.
I currently use the blade 93 from 2013 with volkl cyclone strung around 57 lbs.
With that setup I am able to hit a hard flat ball, without having to fear the ball will be going long.
I am looking for a slightly bigger head size and a more forgiving frame with a slightly bigger sweet spot.
I was thinking of testing a TF T-fight 315RS, the new Wilson blade 98 18x20, Wilson clash 98, head gravity pro, prince textreme 95. What do you reckon? Do you have any other options I could try?
Those are great racquets - I would also recommend the new Yonex VCORE PRO 97D, which is an 18x20 pattern and provides excellent precision. -Andrew, TW
How has the swingweight dropped from the last version of the weight and balance is the same - 305g/327g??
I believe I tried to explain this to you previously when talking about the Pure Strike 18x20, although that one was an increase in SW. My example was the old AeroPro GT (2010) to the 2013 AeroPro Drive, where there was a decrease in SW by about 15 points. That said, the SW should be thought about more in terms of overall material distribution, and not so much just by the final balance point number. For example, in theory you could achieve an EVEN balance (right at the halfway distance) by placing half the overall weight at the tip and other half at the bottom of the handle (leaving a little weight for the filler in-between). You could also make the same EVEN balance by placing small increments of the weight at every inch, along the 27 inch long racquet. These two distributions have the same EVEN balance, but SW will be much different, because the racquet with half the mass at the tip, will make for a much higher SW. Hope that helps. Troy, TW
@@tenniswarehouse Hey Troy,
Really appreciate your answer and taking the time as always.
You've been in the Blade 98 playtests since the K Blade playtests almost a decade ago so it means a lot.
I have a KBlade and a 2015, would be interesting to know which versions were your favourite or perhaps top 3 favourite versions?
Also when you were playing with the Blade were you using the 16*19 or the 18*20?
Thanks Troy
Troy one-handed backhand. Nice.
guess that i will stick with the v7 version as i prefer the higher swing weight
Are lot of manufacturers are going green and flexy in their new frames.
"Grew up playing with the 18x20 as a kid". at Which age did you start playing with it?
Sage started with the Blade 18x20 around his high school years, and then eventually transitioned to the 16x19 later on in college. Troy, TW
What is the main difference between the v7 and yes with the same string pattern and weight to this new version thr v8?
My racket now is because it is the v7 305 weight 18x20. Just sharing
So with this 18x20 v8 we found it to feel slightly more maneuverable in stock form, and also provides a little more ball feedback, or responsiveness as we like to say. It also felt slightly more stable on off-center hits. The v7 18x20 felt like it carried a bit more heft or swingweight, and felt a bit more flexible in the hoop of the racquet. That said, when it comes to maneuverability, swingweight is a huge factor, and in order to guarantee a swingweight number when buying a new racquet, a service like our MRT matching needs to be done. If picking a frame at random from our warehouse, the specs can vary. Troy, TW
@@tenniswarehouse if you were to choose which one will you pick and why?
@@tenniswarehouse is it still a low powered frame?
Dear Tennis Warehouse, anytime soon we can get that written review?
We will post the written review as soon as it is ready and through all of the editing. Typically, the written review will get posted around a month or so from when the video review is made available. Troy, TW
How does blade 98 v8 18x20 compare to TF 40 305 ?
The TF40 305 feels like it offers a bit more energy return, and feels slightly more maneuverable. The Blade 98 18x20 v8 feels a bit lower in power, and feels slightly heavier to maneuver. Troy, TW
Me gusta esa raqueta porque está echa a la antigua raqueta BLX blade tourd Wilson dorada con negro
What are some open 18x20 in 97or98
The Yonex VCORE Pro 97D is a good option. Troy, TW
Is there something to find in this model if you really love the Rf97 ? I'm including here of course the 16x19 one as well. I've never hit with the Blade before
If you really love the heft of the RF97 Autograph, I think you could potentially find either the 16x19 or 18x20 to work, but would need to weight them up close to the hefty specs of the RF97A. That said, if the stiffer feel on contact is what draws into the RF97A, these Blades might not be your cup of tea, as they are quite a bit softer and more plush, but on the plus side that does lend to some added comfort on the arms. Troy, TW
@@tenniswarehouse Thanks for your swift reply. Well, I actually switched to the Rf97, coming from the Babolat aero pro drive cortex version, so that's quite a change :)) I do like to hit with the Rf97 though, even if I find that I shank the ball more often than I used to with the Babolat ( I would say Federer esque shanks lol) but I'm quite satisfied once I hit heavy balls with it, plus the stability coming up to the net. That's one reason I switched to the Rf97 and the other reason being its weight and plow through when absorbing the ball from heavy hitters. I found myself with the Babolat to unstable to hit back a very heavy ball and made me shank those type of balls. The Rf97 does feel like an indestructible tank when the ball is being hit and the ball would be like a small mini cooper car lol. I suppose I wouldn't get this feeling from a Blade, right ?
Ok, need to know what socks Sage is wearing there. They look awesome.
They are Stance socks, but Sage said that he got them a few years back. You can look for similar styles on the Stance socks website, or we have some Stance socks at our sister company, www.skatewarehouse.com/Stance_Socks/catpage-STANCESOCKS.html. Troy, TW
How is possible technically that 18x20 blade has bigger swing weight then 16x19 being the same static weight ?
Although the manufacturer specifications are the same for both models in terms of weight and balance, the extra strings on the stringbed from the 18x20 model will add more swingweight.
-Andrew, TW
Furthermore, it can also have to do with the overall distribution of mass throughout the length of the racquet. In this case there is slight difference in the average balance, but also just where the weight might be slightly more concentrated in the frame. Yes, the 18x20 has three more strings total (two mains, and one cross), but the 7 point average difference between the two racquets, accounts for more than just three strings. Hope that helps. Troy, TW
How would the V8 Blade compare to the TF40 305 18x20 that I really dig.
Both are very solid feeling racquets, with fairly similar specs. I think the main difference really comes down to feel, and a slight difference in the grip/pallet shape. The TF40 305 18x20 (2nd gen) is a bit more firm, so for me I noticed a bit more pop or energy return, and is like a nice borderline of feeling solid and firm, but still decently comfortable. The Blade 98 18x20 v8 is a bit softer, and slightly more comfortable, and maybe just a slight bit less power or energy return. Both swing fairly hefty for 305 gram unstrung racquets. Troy, TW
Excelente video, como sugerencia podría estar con subtitulos en español, Saludos desde Chile
why no blade 93?
Wilson hasn't released a Blade 93 in quite a few years. Not for certain, but it seems like a lot of brands feel like the mid-size racquets are not as relevant for the modern game. The Prince Phantom 93P is a great choice for a midsize, www.tennis-warehouse.com/Prince_Phantom_Racquets/catpage-PRINPHAN.html. Troy, TW
Because it's 2021
Very clear from footage how everyone’s shots are barely clearing the net and landing a bit short..!
michelle you are spot on this raket stinks great review
@AJ,
Hah, don't know if that is what I said, but, the Blades have never been for me! Liked the previous version best and ok with passing on this update!
Michelle, TW
God damn the first girl hits so hard
okay just take my money
troyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
That color scheme is one of the worst I have ever seen.
first