I spent most of 1989 travelling through the USA.With no internet & bugger all cricket news,it wasn't until i arrived in London in mid September that i heard we flogged the Poms 4 nil.Great start to my UK experience.🍻🍾
Ah, so many great memories of that series. Australia had gone through a lean patch of several years in which the only series victory was a 1-0 win over New Zealand. The last series before the Ashes was the Windies at their peak beating Australia 3-1. First test, I remember thinking Border had delayed the 2nd innings declaration too long on the last day, then being amazed at the English collapse. Second test, I remember how close it seemed at the start of the third day, Australia still behind and already 6 down, and then Waugh went berko with the tail. After the third test, I remember fearing Australia might still implode and lose the series like we had in 1981 and 1985, even though England seemed to be the demoralised team. Fifth test, I remember the spectacular first day ending with Australia none down. And for the series as a whole, Australia used the same 11 from the second test onwards (and only 12 players overall) while the English used something like 30 players. And every Australian first innings was over 400. After the dismal years before, the 1989 victory just lit up Australian test cricket. Sure, it still took several years before we beat the West Indies, and even longer before we beat India in India, but it all started there in 1989.
Hard to believe that before this series began there were huge question marks over (a) Border's future as a Captain and (b) Steve Waugh's place in the team (4 years, no century yet). Amazing dominance by Australia, and that was without Craig McDermott & Bruce Reid! Shame we didn't see more from Robin Smith - I remember one cut shot he hit off Big Merv is still the fastest I've ever seen a ball travel to the boundary.
Yes, I think I know the Robin Smith shot you're talking about. It was either that cut shot or a cover drive that was smacked into the middle of next week that I remember. In fact, it was the thing I remember most vividly from that Test series, even though I'm Aussie who was delighted Australia was playing so well again.
Yes, Smith's cuts were exceptional. I don't recall AB being in any trouble re the captaincy - there was absolutely nobody to give the job to and he had a winning World Cup in his CV at this point.
Loved that series. Australia really clicked from Day 1. Only Rain saved England from a 6-0 Drubbing. Amazing to think that Alderman was almost not selected for this tour and Michael Whitney might have been picked instead.
Greg Campbell was the one selected ahead of Whitney, not Alderman. His record in England was well known and he was always going to be selected. Whitney was stiffed.
The quote was “probably the worst team to ever leave the shores of Australia (sic)” … and so began a 16 year Ashes drought for England. What a dominating series win! 🇦🇺👍
A cartoon in the daily newspaper in Adelaide had a couple of elderly gentlemen in a club room with the paper headlines saying it was a poor side. One was saying, "I remember the same headlines back in the 1930s. They introduced us to a no hoper called Bradman."
"The order came from Border, So the Aussies went to Waugh; Dexter had no answer, XXXX hundred was the score. Now the Ashes are where they belong again, Home they come with Al-der-men" Taken from a placard at the victory parade in Sydney. This series was the best! I was 12 at the time and can still remember so much like yesterday! Headingley, Lords, Edgbaston ("and the rain's coming down at Edgbaston"), Old Trafford, Trent Bridge and The Oval just roll off the tongue. Waugh was n/o in the first 3 tests and was out off Angus Fraser in the 4th. Mark Taylor and Geoff Marsh did their amazing stand in the 1st innings of the 5th. It's amazing though now, looking at how patchy the fields were! There'd be an "outcry" if fields like that were served up for an Ashes test these days!
@@woofowl2408 No doubt. The loss of Alderman and Rackemann to the rebel tour certainly helped England win 3-1, but even if Australia with Alderman and Rackemann had won, it would not have made them a great, or even good, team given England’s record in surrounding series.
@@guodade2239 Yep, two very average teams meekly struggling with each other, until Richard Ellison came along in the 5th and 6th Tests and mercifully put Australia down.
Love this. I was born when this series was played. I'd heard of Robin Smith and how damaging he was. But had never seen any footage of him at his best until this.... He looked like a player from the current day. What an animal!
I'm not sure, it could have been one of the 5-0 thrashings they got off the West Indies. The statement fits this series though. England were woeful and were comprehensively thrashed, it would have been 6-0 were it not for the weather.
I remember this series. A scorcher of a summer and Australia always scored 600. Alderman's gentle seamers ripping through England. Home losses to Pakistan in '87 and West Indies in '88 as well. 😮
Worst side to ever leave Australia's shores I seem to recall. I remember listening to the coverage on the radio and loving Steve Waugh in particular punishing England.
The English sporting media also made the same "worst" claim about The Invincibles in 1948. Think about that. An under-17 side plus a 40yo Bradman wouldn't be the worst ever. Their sporting media has no credibility whatsoever, and actually contributes considerably to English defeats.
@jamesfahey4508 I do not think they would have said that about the 1948 Australians! They had beaten England 3-0 in Australia in 1946/1947. They may not have known just how exceptional a side Australia had in 1948, I will admit that, but they knew it was really good, much more so than with the 1989 team.
Still have VHS tape Borders Heroes and played it many times till recent, as no player now and too old to search for one as media and technology moved on, thank for putting it up, as an aside met Steven Phillips at Fitzroy team of the Century dinner, life is about memories yes?
Terry Alderman, aka the smiling assassin, started as a genuine fast bowler, up there with Lillee, injured his shoulder and alas became a very gentle medium pacer. However, in English conditions he would grin, shuffle in, roll the arm over put the ball on a length, and then the magic would begin. He was an incredible bowler.
Alderman was superb, stump to stump brings back memories his release of the ball basically inline with the eye of the umpire, if they missed guaranteed LBW! Great cricketer!!! Think only Warnie was the other to regularly get 40 wickets in a series other than Alderman.
I was 11 years old when this was played and my mother was very unhappy when she’d catch me trying to watch some of the game on the tv at some obscure hour like 3am.
This is what can be achieved with hard work and preparation. They didnt just arrive a week before the Test series and train in the nets and the gym like they do now. They played a whole month of 1st class and limited over matches with hardly a day of rest here and there. There were a couple of 1st class matches between each Test, not just 3 days like they do now. After the last Test they didnt just go home they toured Netherlands and Denmark. Nowadays they have nothing like that, its not a 50/50 contest anymore, its about 80/20 advantage to the home team. Australia hasnt won a series in England since the Waugh brothers era, no current England player has been in a team that won even a single match in Australia
I think the biggest key was just how awful England were at the time. They went 3 straight Ashes series without winning a Test or even threatening to. Tours aren't what they used to be, it wasn't just about playing the Test matches, making the squad was an event because the whole tour was an event. The 2010-11 Australian series is the only time England have won a live Test in Australia since 1986-87. They've been unceremoniously walloped in every other series with just the odd consolation victory in a dead rubber to show for it. 2010-11 is such an anomaly - they gave us 3 hammerings by an innings and in the drawn Test, they were left to bat out time and proceeded to make 1/500 odd, which is still the most contemptuous way to draw a Test I've ever seen!
6 and my first memory of cricket until Lara 277 scg and then I was hooked. They always talk about Terry in this series but really the batting was sensational
This was the series that had Billy Birmingham (of the 12th man Fame) as David Gower claiming that after the 2nd test the Englishmen had plans to get S. Waugh out. "In the third test?" "Well, not necessarily, but we will get him out!"
I remember watching these tests as the first session came on TV around 9.00pm When England batted it was always entertaining with Alderman slicing through the line-up. Just kept hitting the pads & getting LBW's.
too young never seen any of this series unfortunately. Alderman some of the nicest bowling I’ve ever watched, wow. what was that delivery from Merv Hughes!? A slower ball or something unique from him
As a kid growing up in the Lille/chappell/marsh 70s/80s and then the instant demise of the Aussies team by their retirement in the one year it was tough watching the Aussies. They were ‘ok’ but were up against good poms, better Pakistanis and utterly god-like Windies. This ashes win was a shock and was the corner turned. It was everyone else’s turn to retire and sink
I was 24 back then .If I stayed up (only on weekends) I could watch some of this but missed a lot of it . The Tv wasnt recordable then and WWS 9 didnt replay any of it apart from if you watched each News at 6pm. I had to rely on newspaper. Loved Terry Alderman method of bowling close to the wicket and at the time Dean Jones swashbuckling was copied at the Cricket club
This was genuinely among the greatest performance in the history of the game, Australia could hardly win a thing since the Chappell.Lillee era 6 years back, this was the last of the "traditional:"Ashes tours, they had 10-12 matches to prepare before the Tests, just like the Bradman era. Nowadays they have virtually no preparation at all other than practice in the nets and the gym. Australia used 12 players across 6 Tests, England used a barely believable 29 players. No Australian team had regained the Ashes in England since 1934 and it has not happened again since 1989, we may be old and grey before we see this again.
Not one of the greatest performances at all. Glad we won of course but England bowled extremely poorly all summer and their batting left too much to too few.
A sign of the times and a nod to Alderman's stranglehold over Gooch was that there was some graffiti in London exclaiming "THATCHER OUT".... someone added to it "LBW bowled Alderman"
That "worst Ashes team" was garbage at the time. Maybe there were question marks about the bowling (Hughes good, but unknown in England, Lawson a bit inconsistent and maybe past it by then), but Alderman was back and he was unplayable in England. Steve Waugh was on the cusp of greatness, he had been brilliant against the West Indians at home without quite cracking a ton. Border and Boon already had big reputations. It's worth noting that all of the top six batsman made significant contributions on that tour. If anything, the "worst team" applied to the '85 team which had been gutted by the rebel South African tour. Or perhaps the '81 team which sorely missed Greg Chappell and failed to include the experienced Doug Walters.
The 1985 team, indeed, must rank as the worst Australian touring team on record, and at times I have imagined it as the worst touring team since the 1962 Pakistanis who lost 0-4 and did not dismiss England for under 350 in five Tests. In 1985, England did only win 3-1, but consider that in their other home Tests between 1984 and 1989 England went 1-17, with the only win against Sri Lanka in 1988. It is true that England had beaten India 2-1 in India during the previous winter, and regained several banned players from the 1981-82 rebel tour (most critically of course Graham Gooch) immediately before the 1985 Ashes series. However, before that series India had gone 29 consecutive Tests without winning, so even in India one can question how good England must have been. It is possible that Botham’s last great contribution made England better than it was in 1984 or between 1986 and 1989, but that hardly refutes the argument of the 1985 Australians being their worst ever touring team to England. Even the 0-3 1977 Australians had a much stronger England opposition than they faced in 1985: you can see just how much better England bowled from the extant footage. The “worst ever” label can, more certainly, be applied to the 1989 England team, especially to their bowling. Just watching snippets from this series demonstrates - as the 1990 Wisden noted - just how badly England bowled. The following season, in a desperate effort to improve England’s dreadful bowling, the TCCB reduced the seam on the ball and tried to prevent deliberately prepared “result” pitches. The result was an average runs per wicket in the County Championship of 38.72 - the highest on record by at least five runs - and 428 centuries in 241 first-class matches. Wisden was clear that the record scoring did in part reflect the abysmal standard of English bowling, saying plainly that there was not one “good” bowler eligible for England. Some Australian writers said the 1990-91 England team was the worst they had ever seen, which further adds weight to the claim that England’s 1989 team was its worst ever.
@@guodade2239 lol, well covered! I think the only decent English bowler in 1989 was Angus Fraser. But even he was broken near the end of the series. Andy Caddick was emblematic of English bowlers of that 80/90s period: bowl an over that consisted of a few good balls and maybe even trouble the batsman, but then relieve all the pressure with a couple of pies, most often a nice half-volley on leg stump.
@@guodade2239 1990 was a scorcher too. Combined with the reduced seam, fast outfields and hard pitches meant runs aplenty. A punishing season for bowlers.
@@graememason6419 It certainly was punishing for bowlers. The average of 38.72 runs per wicket was half a dozen runs more than ever known before (as I noted above). There was the argument that English seam bowlers had it too easy due to a high-seamed ball and overgrassed, unpredictable pitches, and thus something had to be done about that. Virtually the same argument was made when England lost 1-3 to the 1963 West Indian team, who were even admitted to be the best touring team since the champion 1948 Australians. This suggests that, as my brother says, the pitches were just an excuse for England’s failure. Moreover, it ought not be overlooked that, as former seam bowler Trevor Bailey noted in ‘The Spinners’ Web’ around this time, for spin bowlers modern-day conditions were and are almost impossibly difficult because of much heavier bats - hence many mis-hits for six - plus covered pitches which make spinning the ball almost impossible.
I'd nominate 85 as the worst team we sent in my lifetime. 81 went very close to winning even without Chappell. 85 was AB away from getting thoroughly slaughtered and were embarrassed in the last 2 Tests as it was.
And the "lesson" for any and every TEST MATCH is - NEVER underestimate any opposition. 😲 Just look at and listen to the NAMES of the Aussies that played in this Ashes. Legends all of them. BTW, Gower was always a joy to watch. Class... 😊 M 🦘🏏😎
The TCCB knew just how bad England was. My brother says that English cricketing authorities and the Wisden writers under (editors) John Woodcock and Graeme Wright wanted nothing except for England to win with little effort or work. That is why - despite evidence from the West Indies that better coaching and training was the key to winning - English journalists and managers could think of no solution except to alter conditions to resemble those found when England was winning in the past. That is why they were obsessed with pitches and one-day cricket, although commercial considerations prevented cutting back on limited overs cricket or uncovering pitches (as those writers wanted). The changes they did make did not seriously remedy problems, although England never would be as dreadful as in 1989.
the first ashes i watched as a kid and i remrmber they managed to get s waugh out not until the 2nd inn of 3rd test. b4 that he has an average of early 30s . they seem rely on his bowling than batting b4 the seies. and he had an average of over100 jn batting and less than 20 run per wicket in the series. what a lengend
Hard to believe it was touted as one of the worst aussie squads to tour england with names like Border, S.Waugh, Healy, Boon, Jones, Lawson, Taylor & Hughes in it.
Typical Fleet street English tabloid nonsense. They assumed we'd lose because we were so poor in previous series. Not our best team, but certainly not the worst either. Lacked a top class spinner but otherwise a decent side.
@@driffielddodger7412 They didn't rate the up and comers but there was no real excuse for that, given most of them cleaned England up in the World Cup final 2 years earlier.
The English press labelled Australia the worst team ever when they arrived in England. The massacre of England in the series was remarkable. Mark Taylor and Steve Waugh were unknowns before the series but ended being legends.
More like Englands worst performance in a home ashes series. Abysmal, and Gowers leave was ludicrous along with his walking off with hands behind his back. 🙈
Yeah Bobby Simpson's coaching made the team tougher in all facets of the game. England probably thought Broad will dominate with the bat They just thought they just had to turn up to win and read the newspapers.
That the 1989 England team was that country’s worst of all time is tough to question. If you look at their Test bowling averages, you will see just how atrocious English bowling was - no bowler taking more than twelve wickets, no haul of five in an innings, never dismissing Australia for under 400! The record run-scoring of the “Year of the Bat” in 1990 further demonstrates how awful English bowling was at this time - generally mediocre batsmen were able to score a record 428 centuries and average 38.72 for the entire County Championship season.
Those are grim statistics! I remember watching this series as a boy and bloody hell we (England) were absolutely woeful, the 1993 Ashes series was also dreadful for an England fan but this was even worse somehow. Just totally outclassed by a much better side. Other than Smith's and Lamb's centuries there was literally nothing to shout about. The bowling was especially bad like you say. The bowlers we had at the time simply weren't up to test standard.
@@guodade2239 Of note re the batting: cities across the United Kingdom broke their all-time temperature records in the dramatic 1990 United Kingdom heat wave
@guodade2239 very good point. That English team did not apply themselves very well at all and their bowlers delivered rubbish virtually all season long.
This is the only kind of cricket (or rugby league) that I watch since the propaganda scammers unleashed their Convid reign of terror campaign in 2020. Did not, and will not watch a single ball of the recent woke cricketer's nonsense.
Father Time remains undefeated. I remember going to the Saturday of the Lords test that year, and being a touch late we heard the roar when Marsh got out early before we got in! My mates were all English and I was the only Aussie but after that day we were on top!. Coming up 40 years ago now! Seems only a shrt time ago...
Terry Alderman was a terrific bowler both before and after his horrific shoulder injury. A true Aussie legend.
I spent most of 1989 travelling through the USA.With no internet & bugger all cricket news,it wasn't until i arrived in London in mid September that i heard we flogged the Poms 4 nil.Great start to my UK experience.🍻🍾
Sounds like an experience wish I was born before the internet
@@TH-camCO713twas a better time. 😂
Haha great post. Of course in todays global instant media world, that cant be repeated
Ah, so many great memories of that series. Australia had gone through a lean patch of several years in which the only series victory was a 1-0 win over New Zealand. The last series before the Ashes was the Windies at their peak beating Australia 3-1.
First test, I remember thinking Border had delayed the 2nd innings declaration too long on the last day, then being amazed at the English collapse.
Second test, I remember how close it seemed at the start of the third day, Australia still behind and already 6 down, and then Waugh went berko with the tail.
After the third test, I remember fearing Australia might still implode and lose the series like we had in 1981 and 1985, even though England seemed to be the demoralised team.
Fifth test, I remember the spectacular first day ending with Australia none down.
And for the series as a whole, Australia used the same 11 from the second test onwards (and only 12 players overall) while the English used something like 30 players. And every Australian first innings was over 400. After the dismal years before, the 1989 victory just lit up Australian test cricket. Sure, it still took several years before we beat the West Indies, and even longer before we beat India in India, but it all started there in 1989.
You can thank the cheat umpires for that 1-0 series win over New Zealand. The '87 series should've finished 1-1.
I was 14 when this was played and remember sitting up in the early hours on the odd day watching parts of the matches… classic stuff loved it!
Hard to believe that before this series began there were huge question marks over (a) Border's future as a Captain and (b) Steve Waugh's place in the team (4 years, no century yet). Amazing dominance by Australia, and that was without Craig McDermott & Bruce Reid! Shame we didn't see more from Robin Smith - I remember one cut shot he hit off Big Merv is still the fastest I've ever seen a ball travel to the boundary.
Yes, I think I know the Robin Smith shot you're talking about. It was either that cut shot or a cover drive that was smacked into the middle of next week that I remember. In fact, it was the thing I remember most vividly from that Test series, even though I'm Aussie who was delighted Australia was playing so well again.
Yes, Smith's cuts were exceptional. I don't recall AB being in any trouble re the captaincy - there was absolutely nobody to give the job to and he had a winning World Cup in his CV at this point.
Loved that series. Australia really clicked from Day 1. Only Rain saved England from a 6-0 Drubbing. Amazing to think that Alderman was almost not selected for this tour and Michael Whitney might have been picked instead.
Greg Campbell was the one selected ahead of Whitney, not Alderman. His record in England was well known and he was always going to be selected. Whitney was stiffed.
The quote was “probably the worst team to ever leave the shores of Australia (sic)” … and so began a 16 year Ashes drought for England. What a dominating series win! 🇦🇺👍
A cartoon in the daily newspaper in Adelaide had a couple of elderly gentlemen in a club room with the paper headlines saying it was a poor side.
One was saying, "I remember the same headlines back in the 1930s. They introduced us to a no hoper called Bradman."
"The order came from Border,
So the Aussies went to Waugh;
Dexter had no answer, XXXX hundred was the score.
Now the Ashes are where they belong again,
Home they come with Al-der-men"
Taken from a placard at the victory parade in Sydney.
This series was the best! I was 12 at the time and can still remember so much like yesterday! Headingley, Lords, Edgbaston ("and the rain's coming down at Edgbaston"), Old Trafford, Trent Bridge and The Oval just roll off the tongue. Waugh was n/o in the first 3 tests and was out off Angus Fraser in the 4th. Mark Taylor and Geoff Marsh did their amazing stand in the 1st innings of the 5th.
It's amazing though now, looking at how patchy the fields were! There'd be an "outcry" if fields like that were served up for an Ashes test these days!
The godfather of modern Australian cricket. AB is a legend
At 12:05 The Terry Alderman In Swinger was marvellous
This series was the start of the greatest ever golden era in Australian cricket. Any cricket, really.
Terry Alderman was something else.
He was brilliant on the 1981 tour as well, shame that he went to South Africa instead of the 1985 Ashes, a big reason that Australia lost that series.
@@woofowl2408 No doubt. The loss of Alderman and Rackemann to the rebel tour certainly helped England win 3-1, but even if Australia with Alderman and Rackemann had won, it would not have made them a great, or even good, team given England’s record in surrounding series.
@@guodade2239 Yep, two very average teams meekly struggling with each other, until Richard Ellison came along in the 5th and 6th Tests and mercifully put Australia down.
In English conditions yes, elsewhere not so much.
@@guodade2239 Hell no, but it would have made up for the pain of watching us crumble in those final 2 tests!
1:00 that's the quintessential Steve Waugh shot right there!
Love this.
I was born when this series was played. I'd heard of Robin Smith and how damaging he was. But had never seen any footage of him at his best until this....
He looked like a player from the current day. What an animal!
couldn't play spin
best square cutter ive seen
@@sentimentalbloke185
So definitely like a player from the modern day
@@StuTheDon17 Modern players can't play spin?
@sentimentalbloke185
Very few can, compared to the older days.
Overall, the ability to play spin has decreased amongst batsmen.
Attended the 1986 MCG Test when England beat Austraya within three days to retain the Ashes. This series was sweet revenge.
Love it how the batsmen take the umpi's decision, tuck the bat under the arm and walk off.
Was this the series that David Gower was asked about losing 4-nil and said "we were lucky to get that nil"?
I'm not sure, it could have been one of the 5-0 thrashings they got off the West Indies. The statement fits this series though. England were woeful and were comprehensively thrashed, it would have been 6-0 were it not for the weather.
I remember this series. A scorcher of a summer and Australia always scored 600. Alderman's gentle seamers ripping through England. Home losses to Pakistan in '87 and West Indies in '88 as well. 😮
Tower and Steve Waugh were always beautiful to watch. Graceful. Alderman's swing was really something to watch in the right conditions.
Best part is the comm team of Richie, Bill, Tony and Ian
Worst side to ever leave Australia's shores I seem to recall. I remember listening to the coverage on the radio and loving Steve Waugh in particular punishing England.
The English sporting media also made the same "worst" claim about The Invincibles in 1948. Think about that. An under-17 side plus a 40yo Bradman wouldn't be the worst ever. Their sporting media has no credibility whatsoever, and actually contributes considerably to English defeats.
@jamesfahey4508 I do not think they would have said that about the 1948 Australians! They had beaten England 3-0 in Australia in 1946/1947. They may not have known just how exceptional a side Australia had in 1948, I will admit that, but they knew it was really good, much more so than with the 1989 team.
Still have VHS tape Borders Heroes and played it many times till recent, as no player now and too old to search for one as media and technology moved on, thank for putting it up, as an aside met Steven Phillips at Fitzroy team of the Century dinner, life is about memories yes?
Terry Alderman, aka the smiling assassin, started as a genuine fast bowler, up there with Lillee, injured his shoulder and alas became a very gentle medium pacer. However, in English conditions he would grin, shuffle in, roll the arm over put the ball on a length, and then the magic would begin. He was an incredible bowler.
Alderman was superb, stump to stump brings back memories his release of the ball basically inline with the eye of the umpire, if they missed guaranteed LBW! Great cricketer!!! Think only Warnie was the other to regularly get 40 wickets in a series other than Alderman.
I lost count on how many Australian Captains in that team.
God bless AB.
Hope you are well mate.
💯🙏🇦🇺
I was 11 years old when this was played and my mother was very unhappy when she’d catch me trying to watch some of the game on the tv at some obscure hour like 3am.
If you had of went to bed just 5 minutes before stumps ( 3am) she wouldn't have caught you! LoL.
This is what can be achieved with hard work and preparation. They didnt just arrive a week before the Test series and train in the nets and the gym like they do now. They played a whole month of 1st class and limited over matches with hardly a day of rest here and there. There were a couple of 1st class matches between each Test, not just 3 days like they do now. After the last Test they didnt just go home they toured Netherlands and Denmark. Nowadays they have nothing like that, its not a 50/50 contest anymore, its about 80/20 advantage to the home team. Australia hasnt won a series in England since the Waugh brothers era, no current England player has been in a team that won even a single match in Australia
I think the biggest key was just how awful England were at the time. They went 3 straight Ashes series without winning a Test or even threatening to. Tours aren't what they used to be, it wasn't just about playing the Test matches, making the squad was an event because the whole tour was an event.
The 2010-11 Australian series is the only time England have won a live Test in Australia since 1986-87. They've been unceremoniously walloped in every other series with just the odd consolation victory in a dead rubber to show for it. 2010-11 is such an anomaly - they gave us 3 hammerings by an innings and in the drawn Test, they were left to bat out time and proceeded to make 1/500 odd, which is still the most contemptuous way to draw a Test I've ever seen!
6 and my first memory of cricket until Lara 277 scg and then I was hooked. They always talk about Terry in this series but really the batting was sensational
This was the series that had Billy Birmingham (of the 12th man Fame) as David Gower claiming that after the 2nd test the Englishmen had plans to get S. Waugh out.
"In the third test?"
"Well, not necessarily, but we will get him out!"
Alderman was perfect for english conditions. He always did well in england.
I remember watching these tests as the first session came on TV around 9.00pm
When England batted it was always entertaining with Alderman slicing through the line-up.
Just kept hitting the pads & getting LBW's.
Thankyou that was great 👍🏼
A few years later australia came back with Shane Warne, lmao
The Ashes Series of 1989 is rated the GOAT IMO out of all the 73 Ashes Series since 1882!
too young never seen any of this series unfortunately. Alderman some of the nicest bowling I’ve ever watched, wow. what was that delivery from Merv Hughes!? A slower ball or something unique from him
As a kid growing up in the Lille/chappell/marsh 70s/80s and then the instant demise of the Aussies team by their retirement in the one year it was tough watching the Aussies. They were ‘ok’ but were up against good poms, better Pakistanis and utterly god-like Windies.
This ashes win was a shock and was the corner turned. It was everyone else’s turn to retire and sink
I was 24 back then .If I stayed up (only on weekends) I could watch some of this but missed a lot of it . The Tv wasnt recordable then and WWS 9 didnt replay any of it apart from if you watched each News at 6pm. I had to rely on newspaper. Loved Terry Alderman method of bowling close to the wicket and at the time Dean Jones swashbuckling was copied at the Cricket club
What a squad!
This isn’t a cricket match. It’s a humiliation 😊
This was genuinely among the greatest performance in the history of the game, Australia could hardly win a thing since the Chappell.Lillee era 6 years back, this was the last of the "traditional:"Ashes tours, they had 10-12 matches to prepare before the Tests, just like the Bradman era. Nowadays they have virtually no preparation at all other than practice in the nets and the gym. Australia used 12 players across 6 Tests, England used a barely believable 29 players. No Australian team had regained the Ashes in England since 1934 and it has not happened again since 1989, we may be old and grey before we see this again.
Not one of the greatest performances at all. Glad we won of course but England bowled extremely poorly all summer and their batting left too much to too few.
It's not like we lose the Ashes in Australia too often!
A sign of the times and a nod to Alderman's stranglehold over Gooch was that there was some graffiti in London exclaiming "THATCHER OUT".... someone added to it "LBW bowled Alderman"
Old school cricket 🏏
That "worst Ashes team" was garbage at the time. Maybe there were question marks about the bowling (Hughes good, but unknown in England, Lawson a bit inconsistent and maybe past it by then), but Alderman was back and he was unplayable in England. Steve Waugh was on the cusp of greatness, he had been brilliant against the West Indians at home without quite cracking a ton. Border and Boon already had big reputations. It's worth noting that all of the top six batsman made significant contributions on that tour.
If anything, the "worst team" applied to the '85 team which had been gutted by the rebel South African tour. Or perhaps the '81 team which sorely missed Greg Chappell and failed to include the experienced Doug Walters.
The 1985 team, indeed, must rank as the worst Australian touring team on record, and at times I have imagined it as the worst touring team since the 1962 Pakistanis who lost 0-4 and did not dismiss England for under 350 in five Tests.
In 1985, England did only win 3-1, but consider that in their other home Tests between 1984 and 1989 England went 1-17, with the only win against Sri Lanka in 1988. It is true that England had beaten India 2-1 in India during the previous winter, and regained several banned players from the 1981-82 rebel tour (most critically of course Graham Gooch) immediately before the 1985 Ashes series. However, before that series India had gone 29 consecutive Tests without winning, so even in India one can question how good England must have been. It is possible that Botham’s last great contribution made England better than it was in 1984 or between 1986 and 1989, but that hardly refutes the argument of the 1985 Australians being their worst ever touring team to England. Even the 0-3 1977 Australians had a much stronger England opposition than they faced in 1985: you can see just how much better England bowled from the extant footage.
The “worst ever” label can, more certainly, be applied to the 1989 England team, especially to their bowling. Just watching snippets from this series demonstrates - as the 1990 Wisden noted - just how badly England bowled. The following season, in a desperate effort to improve England’s dreadful bowling, the TCCB reduced the seam on the ball and tried to prevent deliberately prepared “result” pitches. The result was an average runs per wicket in the County Championship of 38.72 - the highest on record by at least five runs - and 428 centuries in 241 first-class matches. Wisden was clear that the record scoring did in part reflect the abysmal standard of English bowling, saying plainly that there was not one “good” bowler eligible for England. Some Australian writers said the 1990-91 England team was the worst they had ever seen, which further adds weight to the claim that England’s 1989 team was its worst ever.
@@guodade2239 lol, well covered! I think the only decent English bowler in 1989 was Angus Fraser. But even he was broken near the end of the series. Andy Caddick was emblematic of English bowlers of that 80/90s period: bowl an over that consisted of a few good balls and maybe even trouble the batsman, but then relieve all the pressure with a couple of pies, most often a nice half-volley on leg stump.
@@guodade2239 1990 was a scorcher too. Combined with the reduced seam, fast outfields and hard pitches meant runs aplenty. A punishing season for bowlers.
@@graememason6419 It certainly was punishing for bowlers. The average of 38.72 runs per wicket was half a dozen runs more than ever known before (as I noted above).
There was the argument that English seam bowlers had it too easy due to a high-seamed ball and overgrassed, unpredictable pitches, and thus something had to be done about that. Virtually the same argument was made when England lost 1-3 to the 1963 West Indian team, who were even admitted to be the best touring team since the champion 1948 Australians. This suggests that, as my brother says, the pitches were just an excuse for England’s failure. Moreover, it ought not be overlooked that, as former seam bowler Trevor Bailey noted in ‘The Spinners’ Web’ around this time, for spin bowlers modern-day conditions were and are almost impossibly difficult because of much heavier bats - hence many mis-hits for six - plus covered pitches which make spinning the ball almost impossible.
I'd nominate 85 as the worst team we sent in my lifetime. 81 went very close to winning even without Chappell. 85 was AB away from getting thoroughly slaughtered and were embarrassed in the last 2 Tests as it was.
And the "lesson" for any and every TEST MATCH is - NEVER underestimate any opposition. 😲
Just look at and listen to the NAMES of the Aussies that played in this Ashes. Legends all of them.
BTW, Gower was always a joy to watch. Class... 😊
M 🦘🏏😎
England were dire in the late 80s. Didn’t win a test at home except v Sri Lanka 1986-1989
The TCCB knew just how bad England was. My brother says that English cricketing authorities and the Wisden writers under (editors) John Woodcock and Graeme Wright wanted nothing except for England to win with little effort or work. That is why - despite evidence from the West Indies that better coaching and training was the key to winning - English journalists and managers could think of no solution except to alter conditions to resemble those found when England was winning in the past. That is why they were obsessed with pitches and one-day cricket, although commercial considerations prevented cutting back on limited overs cricket or uncovering pitches (as those writers wanted). The changes they did make did not seriously remedy problems, although England never would be as dreadful as in 1989.
Wow 6 test series haven’t seen that but what an Australian team Sould we brown the 6 test series back
the first ashes i watched as a kid and i remrmber they managed to get s waugh out not until the 2nd inn of 3rd test. b4 that he has an average of early 30s . they seem rely on his bowling than batting b4 the seies. and he had an average of over100 jn batting and less than 20 run per wicket in the series. what a lengend
🙏 I will never forget what Dean, Mark T, Terry, Allan and Steve did back in the Eng summer of 89 to humiliate the English. Thank you
How good were the Merv yorkers
I hope he be fine
thank you another Ashes highlights please
Hard to believe it was touted as one of the worst aussie squads to tour england with names like Border, S.Waugh, Healy, Boon, Jones, Lawson, Taylor & Hughes in it.
Typical Fleet street English tabloid nonsense. They assumed we'd lose because we were so poor in previous series. Not our best team, but certainly not the worst either. Lacked a top class spinner but otherwise a decent side.
@@driffielddodger7412 They didn't rate the up and comers but there was no real excuse for that, given most of them cleaned England up in the World Cup final 2 years earlier.
Brave anyone calling that line-up the 'worst'.
I remember when Alderman was picked - he had not been picked in Aust for a while and thought ....just why? And that was why.
The English press labelled Australia the worst team ever when they arrived in England.
The massacre of England in the series was remarkable. Mark Taylor and Steve Waugh were unknowns before the series but ended being legends.
1:39 Plumb. Absolutely plumb. You can see the indent.
Awesome
This might have been peak Bill Lawrie.
No DRS required when stumps are flying everywhere 😂😂😂 and the umpires decisions on LBW's quick as a whip how it should be
"Thatcher out! lbw. Alderman"
Graffiti all over London.
Terry Alderman was the difference. What a seamer!
lol did Gooch get double figures combined for the whole series? 😂😂
Alderman's bunny
King 👑 steve
Just imagine any test oval looking as primitive as the 5th test in this day and age. Well excluding India 😂
Trinidad, Guyana, (most other grounds in the Caribbean)
England's umpires were on form that series; fired their own batsman out lbw all summer😅
More like Englands worst performance in a home ashes series. Abysmal, and Gowers leave was ludicrous along with his walking off with hands behind his back. 🙈
Yeah Bobby Simpson's coaching made the team tougher in all facets of the game. England probably thought Broad will dominate with the bat They just thought they just had to turn up to win and read the newspapers.
That the 1989 England team was that country’s worst of all time is tough to question. If you look at their Test bowling averages, you will see just how atrocious English bowling was - no bowler taking more than twelve wickets, no haul of five in an innings, never dismissing Australia for under 400! The record run-scoring of the “Year of the Bat” in 1990 further demonstrates how awful English bowling was at this time - generally mediocre batsmen were able to score a record 428 centuries and average 38.72 for the entire County Championship season.
Those are grim statistics! I remember watching this series as a boy and bloody hell we (England) were absolutely woeful, the 1993 Ashes series was also dreadful for an England fan but this was even worse somehow. Just totally outclassed by a much better side. Other than Smith's and Lamb's centuries there was literally nothing to shout about. The bowling was especially bad like you say. The bowlers we had at the time simply weren't up to test standard.
@@guodade2239 Of note re the batting: cities across the United Kingdom broke their all-time temperature records in the dramatic 1990 United Kingdom heat wave
@guodade2239 very good point. That English team did not apply themselves very well at all and their bowlers delivered rubbish virtually all season long.
Lamb the great "English" hope.....a Saffa 😂
The stsrt of arguably the greatest team in history. England wouldnt win them back until 2005.
Rain saved England's ass twice in this series but they whine about it today. Cry more, poms.
England were dreadful. English cricket was preparing itself for the 1990s it’s nadir decade.
The crowds are pathetic
This was a wonderful time to be living in the uk
Our worst team will always beat Englands wosrt
🤩🤩🤩🤩
it has to be said .. the white hats on the English .. they look bad .. they played bad?
The original bazball
Those England umpires are so biased.
This is the only kind of cricket (or rugby league) that I watch since the propaganda scammers unleashed their Convid reign of terror campaign in 2020.
Did not, and will not watch a single ball of the recent woke cricketer's nonsense.
Father Time remains undefeated. I remember going to the Saturday of the Lords test that year, and being a touch late we heard the roar when Marsh got out early before we got in! My mates were all English and I was the only Aussie but after that day we were on top!. Coming up 40 years ago now! Seems only a shrt time ago...
Steve Waugh's breakout series as a batsman
SD tv before we had SD... brilliant.