ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

OVERRATED FANTASY BOOKS

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ก.ค. 2019
  • Here are some popular fantasy books that you all feel are overrated and overhyped.
    This is just for fun!
    My Book: www.elliotbrooksnovels.com/pe...
    My Instagram: / ebnovels
    Peace and Turmoil Instagram: / the_dark_shores
    Twitter: / ebnovels
    Website: www.elliotbrooksnovels.com/shop
    My Patreon: www.patreon.com/user?u=15204080
    Here's the link to the charity Save the Children. Feel free to share this link with others!
    support.savethechildren.org/si...
    2040 S Alma School Rd. Ste 1
    Box 515
    Chandler, AZ
    85286
    USA
    If you're a self-published author, I can include your book in a book haul, but I can't promise I'll be able to review it
    #overratedbooks #overhypedbooks #unpopularopinions

ความคิดเห็น • 1.3K

  • @mickeyfrickinmouse5533
    @mickeyfrickinmouse5533 4 ปีที่แล้ว +564

    Does anyone else just squint into the background and try to figure out what books the person has instead of actually looking at the person😂😂

    • @mickeyfrickinmouse5533
      @mickeyfrickinmouse5533 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Tradjick I do the exact same thing and I have no idea y😂😂I’m so weird

    • @lunaticslair81
      @lunaticslair81 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Well, I do. Yesterday I purchased The Folk of the Air trilogy because she has it in her collection. 😂

    • @larisaandreea3387
      @larisaandreea3387 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I just screenshoted and zoomed the books😂😂😂

    • @lightonthehill8548
      @lightonthehill8548 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Three seconds in I recognised Brandon Sanderson behind her left shoulder, so.... no, we're all either weird or super observant

    • @mayursurpurkar3428
      @mayursurpurkar3428 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mickey Frickin mouse The first thing I did.

  • @marcusmusings
    @marcusmusings 4 ปีที่แล้ว +274

    I read the Six of Crows duology without reading the Grisha trilogy, and I enjoyed them immensely

    • @ricknavarro8181
      @ricknavarro8181 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      I agree I liked the original trilogy but six of crows and crooked kingdom were superior writing in my opinion

    • @paolina1802
      @paolina1802 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same

    • @lisatachibana643
      @lisatachibana643 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I just sarted with Six of Crows and didn't realise it was part of a universe. I kinda felt like someone thrw me into cold water because I missed the explanation or something. It hella confused me but I also liked it. And tbh if I had started with Grisha I think I would't have read through the end.

    • @greywind4310
      @greywind4310 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I've just finished it three days ago and still can't get it out of my mind. That's why I'm watching fantasy book recommendation videos 😂😉

  • @mrgodliak
    @mrgodliak 5 ปีที่แล้ว +414

    Here I am just figuring out Smh means shake my head.

    • @SheiaLyn
      @SheiaLyn 5 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      mrgodliak Same! I actually thought it meant so much hate. Oops? Lol.

    • @nathansequeira182
      @nathansequeira182 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I thought it meant suck my head. I literally was listening to her

    • @shahana909
      @shahana909 5 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      I thought it's short of 'somehow' 🤣🤣

    • @narata1541
      @narata1541 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      This post gave me a good laugh. 😆

    • @TG-ob5fn
      @TG-ob5fn 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      mrgodliak took me asking my younger brother 😆

  • @maia_gaia
    @maia_gaia 5 ปีที่แล้ว +116

    I truly don't understand people comparing Sanderson and Martin (or the weird theory that if Martin dies before finishing the series, Sanderson will complete it.) The ONLY similarity between their books is that they both write fantasy, but even then, their style of fantasy are........
    Not the same. At all. Their writing styles couldn't be more different, and the actual content is incomparable. Such a weird comparison to make, imo

    • @henrym.1290
      @henrym.1290 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is oddly humorous lol

    • @jonm2416
      @jonm2416 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Agreed

    • @Y_Khal
      @Y_Khal 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Completly agree. I find Sanderson books very interesting but I can't connect with his writing, with GRRM is kinda the opposit for me. They write very differently, don't aproach similar topics or characterisation... Yeah, they both just write fantasy and that's where similarities end. Both talented and with a huge fanbese! Good for them

    • @retrogradebolide2198
      @retrogradebolide2198 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sanderson has expressly stated he wouldn't even attempt to complete it if asked

  • @davids2735
    @davids2735 5 ปีที่แล้ว +294

    I love Name of the Wind. But I would never sit there and say "this book is for everyone!" It is clearly not and because of that aspect I can understand why people would say its overhyped.

    • @giginoelani5880
      @giginoelani5880 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What kind of people do you think its for? I'm thinking of reading it but idk if I'll like it

    • @davids2735
      @davids2735 5 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@giginoelani5880 if you like very character driven stories I think you would really enjoy this. There are a lot of very interesting characters. The world is very interesting as well and has a TON of lore to explore if you are into that kind of stuff.
      I will caution, this book is relatively slow paced. I typically prefer faster paced books, but for this one the slower pace didnt bother me because the characters, plot, world, and lore were so interesting. But I know that did make it not for some people. As I'm sure you have heard the writing style is beautiful. Patrick Rothfuss has a great way of putting emotions into words that I've never seen in a fantasy author before.
      Hope that helps!

    • @giginoelani5880
      @giginoelani5880 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It does sound like something I'll like :)
      I think I'll pick it up at the library and check it out

    • @davids2735
      @davids2735 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@giginoelani5880 that's great! I hope you end up loving it!

    • @giginoelani5880
      @giginoelani5880 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@davids2735 i hope so too! I always loved Patrick Rothfuss' reviews on Neil Gaiman's (my fav author) books!

  • @brendan9868
    @brendan9868 4 ปีที่แล้ว +135

    The Sanderson/Martin comparison doesn’t even make sense. They’re completely different styles and each of them are amazing at what they do.

    • @kovidarora3479
      @kovidarora3479 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      YES . EXACTLY .

    • @georgethompson1460
      @georgethompson1460 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Except sanderson actually finishes his books.

    • @VeyroneR
      @VeyroneR 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Sanderson is not amazing at what he does. His prose is terrible and cardboard characters...damn, so bad.

    • @paulbryden4006
      @paulbryden4006 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      How people can make it, is beyond me completely different in style and approach and delivery

    • @ClayMe8292
      @ClayMe8292 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@VeyroneR Lol. That's just your opinion. And your opinion is in a very slim minority.
      He loves writing books and he is awesome at what he does. And he consistently keeps producing high-quality stuff.

  • @CoraFoerstner
    @CoraFoerstner 5 ปีที่แล้ว +234

    I read Six of Crows first and had no trouble understanding the magic system. Of the two series, Six of Crows is my favorite.

    • @Clairemccord
      @Clairemccord 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I’m actually happy to read this. I was going to read six of crows next and was a little worried after hearing that.

    • @wolfferoni
      @wolfferoni 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I didn't have trouble understanding the magic system either but I still recommend people read the grisha trilogy before six of crows if they're going to read both. I also prefer six of crows over the grisha trilogy and feel like you understand more. We don't know much about Nina or Ravka and the whole army thing going on. We also meet a few central characters from the grisha trilogy in six of crows at some point and it's way more meaningful after getting to know them in the grisha trilogy

    • @rin55
      @rin55 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I just read SoC and am in the middle of CK, without having read the hrosha books, and had 0 difficulty understanding things. So I would still stand with those who say you don't have to read the earlier books by the author.

    • @hamdaarif9947
      @hamdaarif9947 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Completely agree! I absolutely loved SOC and have no intention of reading the grisha trilogy

  • @jayceetackett6536
    @jayceetackett6536 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    i read six of crows first and completely understood it???

  • @josieg.608
    @josieg.608 5 ปีที่แล้ว +124

    I love SJM’s books but I completely agree, they should NOT be marketed as YA.

    • @Lilac-and-Gooseberries
      @Lilac-and-Gooseberries 5 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      It’s quite strange, I’m currently reading Queen of Shadows and have noticed the big jump in swearing and body descriptions. Lots of muscled torso’s and full breasts and steamy scenes. I’m no prude in any way but I wonder if it still can be labelled as YA.

    • @melanie1125
      @melanie1125 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Xsari Wait till Empire of storms. Definitely not YA

    • @johannahall2143
      @johannahall2143 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I feel like once she started focusing on the acotar series, it slipped more into throne of glass. Which I wasn't a huge fan of. Rowan started to feel like a long lost twin of rhys

    • @TheTaylorham95
      @TheTaylorham95 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      They're marketed as New Adult, but because it's such a newer group, most bookstores dont know where to place it so they put it with ya.

    • @vanessaebony529
      @vanessaebony529 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The Court of Rose and Thorns series was actually New Adult and the bookstores put them in the YA section when they should have been put in the adult section. New Adult did not take off like writers wanted so they have to be advertised depending on the content as adult or YA. Since CORAT has some graphiic scenes they should be in the adult section

  • @lostinabookcase3796
    @lostinabookcase3796 5 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Whoever wrote that Circe comment....YES good sir or madam. YES!!!!

  • @nijinoshita3301
    @nijinoshita3301 5 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    Ok I've read the Six of Crows Duology before the Grisha trillogy, and I reread it again after reading the Grisha books...
    for me I did not miss the info about the Magic in Six of Crows, and I loved it. But also on the reread afterwards I only noticed how many things about the Grisha books were actually mentioned in Six of Crows.

    • @starkazing7817
      @starkazing7817 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I totally agree. I read SoC first and absolutely loved it - Grisha not so much. I thought the magic is not so important for the storyline of Six of Crows.

    • @rennebright5886
      @rennebright5886 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@ammalyrical5646 I disagree. Speaking from a plot perspective, perhaps this opinion has merit; however, the SoC duology is clearly very character-orientated more than anything else, and several character arcs and relationships were nowhere near done by the end of SoC. The length of Crooked Kingdom was extremely necessary in order to further flesh out the complex personalities and dynamics between the crew. Any shorter and the character development would have felt rushed.

  • @shehzadshaikh9670
    @shehzadshaikh9670 5 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Wherever anyone talk about overrated book they almost always talk about The Name of The Wind and that really hearts. But I THANK YOU for just sharing opinion like a mature reader and not trashing any books like many other TH-camrs do...

    • @ebnovels
      @ebnovels  5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Haha, I try! Deep down, I of course really don’t like some books, but I’m very aware that it’s just my opinion 😆

    • @MarMi00
      @MarMi00 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It is overrated. Not because it's bad, but because it has a big (for me) plot hole: why after he learnt magic (Sympathy), he later doesn't even once try to use it after the "incident"? At least in book one, I read through ~3/4? He just completely forgets about it. Unless it's explained near the end?

    • @ffrank10green
      @ffrank10green 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MarMi00 i think this is explained in the books. I'll agree maybe something that the reader doesnt understand right away because its not explained right after it happens. I've encountered this problem myself. But later on Kvothe while narrating the story makes this speech about dealing with pain that says : “Perhaps the greatest faculty our minds possess is the ability to cope with pain. Classic thinking teaches us of the four doors of the mind, which everyone moves through according to their need. " First door is sleep, second is forgetting, third is madness and fourth is death. I think that after the loss of his parents, Kvothe's mind was too dameged, so he hides all of his memories behind the "second door" wich is forgetting. This includes memories about his parents, about is group of people and , of course, Sympathy Memories that comes back only after years and years of healing. Let me know if it was helpful in claryfing this aspect. Peace :)

    • @pastapasteque3032
      @pastapasteque3032 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MarMi00 i have a small theory : we know that sympathy takes strengh of mind so maybe something that will happen in the third book will weaken kvothe's mind?
      Also SPOILER ALERT : there is a moment in the present (so at the waystone inn ) when i think it was a soldier acting kinda like a zombie and kvothe tries to do sympathy to stop him but fails

    • @MarMi00
      @MarMi00 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pastapasteque3032 I was talking about his past (first book), when he learns Sympathy and then he conveniently (for the plot) forgets all about it without an explanation for two years. If only the author at least wrote that he tried to use it unsuccessfully it would be ok... But he doesn't even try.

  • @007Imola
    @007Imola 4 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    About GRRM - I like Sanderson but I was much more emotionally invested in ASOIAF than in any of the Sanderson books I’ve read.

    • @JLchevz
      @JLchevz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Too true. I can't relate as much to any mistborn character as even the most minor of ASOIAF's characters

    • @joshrivers5191
      @joshrivers5191 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Completely agree. If she'd read them I doubt she would've included it in this video. In my opinion they're underrated.

    • @CoolAsianGuy
      @CoolAsianGuy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JLchevz why would you relate to book chars?

    • @vizar1337
      @vizar1337 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Its probably because characters in ASOIAF go through so much horror and turmoil that you cant help but feel for them. I think the Stormlight Archive is my favourite though; by far one of my favourite magic systems and the characters and plot is fleshed out well and thought provoking.

    • @benjamincarter6095
      @benjamincarter6095 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Martin is better at character development than any modern writer I have read. That being said, I'll never forgive him for finishing the TV series before the books. Sellout.

  • @rashed434
    @rashed434 5 ปีที่แล้ว +105

    I understand not liking First Law, but saying its badly written... smh

    • @morganziegler7351
      @morganziegler7351 5 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Right?? It's not for everyone, style-wise, but it's nowhere near badly written. And I'm well into book three right now and I'm usually quite sensitive to bad treatment of LGBT in books, but I genuinely have no idea what that person is talking about, and I just finished book two last week.

    • @guiledazen44
      @guiledazen44 5 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      It kinda triggered me to be honest. Lmfao. Joe Abercrombie is a gem.

    • @nickd5158
      @nickd5158 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly. I'm the same with the last three Dark Tower books.

    • @Perfidion
      @Perfidion 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      The First Law books are awesome. I understand people being squeamish about all the blood and salty language, but Glokta is worth the price of admission alone. He's one of the best characters I've read in a long time (and he's hilarious in a sick, twisted sort of way). Anyone who can make a crippled, incontinent torturer a sympathetic character isn't guilty of bad writing.

    • @Tomn8er
      @Tomn8er 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The Blade Itself was kind of badly written, especially the prologue. Abercrombie improved markedly after that.

  • @rossapolis
    @rossapolis 4 ปีที่แล้ว +92

    The list
    1:47 The Name of the Wind by Patrick Rothfuss
    2:14 Circe by Madeline Miller
    2:25 Anything written by George R. R. Martin
    2:47 Wheel of Time by Robert Jordan
    3:22 The Fifth Season by N. K. Jemisin
    3:44 The Priory of the Orange Tree by Samantha Shannon
    4:03 Harry Potter books by J.K. Rowling
    4:24 The Dark Tower Series by Stephen King
    4:32 Throne of Glass of anything else written by Sarah J. Maas
    5:15 The First Law Trilogy by Joe Abercrombie
    5:36 The Lies of Locke Lamora by Scott Lynch
    5:46 Mistborn: The Hero of Ages by Brandon Sanderson
    5:52 Children of Blood and Bone by Tomi Adeyemi
    6:00 Red Queen by Victoria Aveyard
    6:10 A Darker Shade of Magic by V. E. Schwab
    6:42 Six of Crows Duology by Leigh Bardugo

    • @atthebridge
      @atthebridge 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Holy shit, is there anything you actually like?

    • @wsp2000
      @wsp2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@atthebridge overrated is not always bad

    • @wsp2000
      @wsp2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lordvongg high five!

    • @ayaakiosawa0
      @ayaakiosawa0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Disagree with first law being over rated. I guess all of these seem boring and trite after Malazan.

    • @DragonHeart613
      @DragonHeart613 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I massively disagree with the idea of The Kingkiller Chronicles (Name of The Wind), George R.R. Martin, The Wheel of Time, Harry Potter & The Dark Tower as being overrated. Yes not everyone likes the same stuff as everyone else, all people have different taste and we should all just respect each other's different likes & dislikes but dubbing something as overrated just because you personally hate it is very very unfair.
      Those aforementioned works are hugely popular & beloved because they are that awesome. Again these books might not be loved by every single person but they've definitely earned their respective massive fanbases because they are all good reads.

  • @gracelingaccountant
    @gracelingaccountant 5 ปีที่แล้ว +175

    i agree with the harry potter statement hahahaha not because it's middle grade but because I'm literally just SO tired of hearing about it 24/7

    • @brookebennett6006
      @brookebennett6006 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Kayla M The Way of Kings is better than Mistborn. It’s by the same author and it’s one of his later and much bigger works.

    • @evtriaevyordofa5676
      @evtriaevyordofa5676 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Then, don't hear it :(. Let people talk what they want :(

    • @hitandruncommentor
      @hitandruncommentor 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yep I feel the same. I only read the last book of the series but saw all the movies and hear point by point break down over the years to the point I am quiet near to hating Harry Potter

  • @lewisoliverleo
    @lewisoliverleo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Please don't let her say Earthsea, please don't let her say Earthsea

  • @willprotector
    @willprotector 5 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    You should also do one on "Underrated" books! Great video.

    • @joshrivers5191
      @joshrivers5191 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah then she can put the Game of Thrones books in that list.

    • @Nemoticon
      @Nemoticon 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joshrivers5191 Huh? lol

    • @joshrivers5191
      @joshrivers5191 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Nemoticon the game of thrones books are underrated in my opinion. This chick has never read them and put them on this list.

    • @Nemoticon
      @Nemoticon 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@joshrivers5191 How can they be underrated when they are international best sellers?????????????????????? Printed and sold in multiple languages by the millions, 25 million copies to be more precise!!! Do you even know what the term means? And if you really did respect that particular series, you'd refer to them by their proper labal, being the Song of Ice and Fire series. Have you even read them yourself? Because if you haven't, you are going to be undone very quickly.

    • @joshrivers5191
      @joshrivers5191 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Nemoticon uh yeah I've read them. How would I know if they're underrated otherwise? I'm not like the girl who made this video who put them on a list of overrated books despite having never read them.
      Any book with a decent publisher makes NY Times Best Seller. All you gotta do is sale a lot of books for 1 week.
      I don't know anybody in real life who has read them but everyone has seen the show. They aren't as popular as I think they should be and they aren't overrated by any means. They're popularity is well deserved.
      Go ahead and undo me lol. Whatever that means?

  • @nicholashildenbrand8632
    @nicholashildenbrand8632 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    There's about one character I can think of from the First Law trilogy who the readers are made to know is lesbian. She is quite literally forced into secrecy based on the the medieval standards of her era and all of her behavior makes sense according to that fact. The book doesn't center on her relationship with her girlfriend either but you are supposed to feel bad because of what happens to her at the end.
    Not sure what people were expecting when she is not supposed to be the focal point of the story?

    • @ubesep
      @ubesep 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Some of the people can find some ridiculous hidden patterns and problems in places there are none. I guess that's just their specific way of doing things.

    • @nicholashildenbrand8632
      @nicholashildenbrand8632 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ubesep "The LGBT people"? You realize that is A LOT of people you just generalized?

  • @Kim_Traveling_in_Books
    @Kim_Traveling_in_Books 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I agree with the person who talked about The Priory of the Orange Tree. I thought it was overwritten, light on plot for the first 500 pages, and had side quests that had little to do with the main plot. I could have put it down 200 pages from the end and not wondered what happened. I was just stubborn enough to finish it.

    • @eniolaolubosi487
      @eniolaolubosi487 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      At a point I was almost in tears when I saw I still had 300 pages left 💀

  • @anniecochrane3359
    @anniecochrane3359 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I'm so glad I read A Song of Ice and Fire many years before the tv series came out - It was pretty special in my opinion - such a variety of well portrayed and interesting characters, story lines and cultures. And I didnt watch the series until I'd read all of the available books so there was no interference. For me the series isnt complete - and that's ok actually.

    • @AceMoonshot
      @AceMoonshot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      My only complaint with Martin's writing is it seems he literally has to describe everything that everyone eats. All the time. In excruciating detail. He talks more about food than he does some pivotal characters lol. His obsession with food makes me roll my eyes rather than engages me. Other than that, great books.
      The series did well up to season 4. Then it just started going off the rails into the mind-boggling bad train wreck that it became.

    • @peterdixon7734
      @peterdixon7734 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@AceMoonshot The descriptions of food make me hungry.

  • @enescustef6154
    @enescustef6154 5 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Idk i didn't read the first grisha trilogy and i absolutely loved the six of crows duology. It did bug me and i wasn't that interested at first, but it kind of made sense as I went along.

    • @slowerpicker
      @slowerpicker 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      enescu stef agree! I just rolled with it. Not everything needs to explained. At bottom, magic is magic!

    • @voldemortthenoselessfreak2126
      @voldemortthenoselessfreak2126 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same, at first i didn't finish reading SoC because the second chapter made me confused of why Joost is just used as an character introduction and not actually a relevant character to the story. that made me dissapointed. but when i tried to read it again i started to get attached to the story and the characters especially to Inej. and I'm currently reading the second book now, btw.

  • @pikachublessu1
    @pikachublessu1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The Alchemist by Paulo Coelho. A great fable for the first half, the second half gets a bit too preachy for my taste.

  • @nickieb2636
    @nickieb2636 5 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    That comment about Hero of Ages... I have to strongly disagree with hahahaha!
    Also, maybe this is not what that person meant, but I do not think that being LGBT should mean you have a shield in the character where they can only be good and whatnot...

    • @thomaskittock2866
      @thomaskittock2866 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      We're all flawed humans, and the characters in First Law are incredibly flawed.

    • @ebnovels
      @ebnovels  5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yeah, I disagree too 😆 Haha, and I haven’t read the other two yet, so I can’t comment, but I agree with your sentiment!

    • @AmeliaOak
      @AmeliaOak 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I’m almost 200 pages into Hero of Ages and it’s awesome

    • @nicolev.3532
      @nicolev.3532 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I actually felt the exact same way as that person and I was pleasantly surprised to see someone else felt that way! I do love Mistborn overall though, but Well of Ascension is the best imo and Hero of Ages was the worst.

    • @CkNoSFeRaTU
      @CkNoSFeRaTU 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I read all first law trilogy in one go and these books left a very distasteful and depressing aftertaste. Close to the end I started to hate pretty much everyone. Stopped reading for over a month after that. Highly recommend. 10/10. ^_^
      I felt the same about Hero of Ages. For me it is the only Sanderson book to date I haven't fully enjoyed. And I've read everything from him except mistborn second era and Alcatraz books.

  • @jonathondunn3602
    @jonathondunn3602 5 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    You should finish Fifth Season, the payoff is worth it

    • @ebnovels
      @ebnovels  5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I’ve heard that...I just can’t stand second person. It drives me crazy 😱😱😱

    • @blueviolets2106
      @blueviolets2106 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I agree and I hate 2nd person but it's actually a good book

    • @jonathondunn3602
      @jonathondunn3602 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I’m only halfway through book 2, but I sense there is a reason for the second person. Either way, I’ve gotten used to it.

    • @Unlitedsoul
      @Unlitedsoul 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@ebnovels It only has sections written in second person, and when you figure out whose perspective it is, it's a very nice pay off. Most of the book, and series, is in third person. It's honestly one of the top 5 "new" trilogies I've read over the past five years. But admittedly, the first few chapters do require a lot of patience.

    • @Sebastian-ek8gi
      @Sebastian-ek8gi 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Rendref 100%, it really goes downhill after book 1

  • @lucaleone4331
    @lucaleone4331 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I can see where hero of ages comes from. It was probably my favorite of the 3 because of how it came all together with all the reveals. But if I had to reread I probably wouldn't enjoy the first half as much. The final empire would be my favorite reread of the 3. Does this make sense >_

    • @ANIMEGAMESBestforeverything
      @ANIMEGAMESBestforeverything 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Luca Leone yes it does final Empire was such a good start

    • @ebnovels
      @ebnovels  5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I think knowing how it all comes together upon reread just fills the reader with a mix of awe and dread 😆

  • @BlerdDaddy85
    @BlerdDaddy85 4 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    The Wheel of Time being overrated REALLY hurts my heart... I mean... Jordan always did get into too much detail with his world and scene building, but it's a quirk I grew to love since it helped paint ridiculously detailed images in my mind, lmao. To each their own, I suppose.

    • @Kruppes_Mule
      @Kruppes_Mule 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I'm trying to force myself through it again... it was one of the first fantasy series I read and I remembered the middle books being a slog but I didn't realize how bad the first books are....I've worn out 3 pairs of shoes reading the first two books. We traveled here, we traveled there, we traveled everywhere and we spent FOREVER doing it.... ffs tell me the story already!!!! I guess when I hadn't read anything good before I considered it to be OK. But now... I'm not sure I can struggle through this for another 12 books.

    • @allenhartman7905
      @allenhartman7905 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Audiobook is mandatory for me on this series. I tried reading it several times and just couldn't get into it. Audiobooked it and really enjoyed the series.

    • @korionterivers9995
      @korionterivers9995 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Rj is the best

    • @Drakenrahll
      @Drakenrahll 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Whenever someone asks me about the Wheel of Time series I always refer to it as "The Greatest Series I Can Never Recommend" The early books are amazing and by the time the series gets it's middle books bloat you're already so sucked in that you have to see it through. The end disappointed me because it was clear that Jordan expected to have a whole other series so there were major arcs and plotlines that never got resolved... I still love the series, the characters and the world, but I cannot recommend for someone to go down that rabbit hole.

    • @rachaelwarrington25
      @rachaelwarrington25 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I love all that detail!

  • @starkazing7817
    @starkazing7817 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I personally really enjoyed "The Priory of the Orange Tree". The beginning was a bit hard to get into, but the rest was nearly fantastic. I didn't find it boring at all, I actually thought there was a ton happening.
    You should definitely read it in my opinion.

  • @umairasif15
    @umairasif15 5 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    You can read "Knight of the seven kingdoms" the three novellas collection of tales of Dunk and Egg to get the taste of Gorge R.R. Martin's writing. I found the stories nice and easy to get without too much Game of Thrones stuff. Then you will finally have some idea about his writing.
    Yes on part 2

    • @j0j01192
      @j0j01192 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Umair Asif and if you’ve watched the show once you get past A Game of Thrones it gets MUCH easier to read.

  • @teslavoltagames3208
    @teslavoltagames3208 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    You should read Game of Thrones. I read the first three books before the tv show came out so I was stoked for the show when it came out. I think the books are *a lot* better, but glad the show gave it exposure and it was a good adaptation (before they had to make stuff up).

    • @spidervenom14
      @spidervenom14 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Reading GoT is pretty pointless seeing that it won't get an ending lol

  • @nakkuzee
    @nakkuzee 5 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    I 've known people who have read The First Law and didn't quite like enjoy it but none of them would dare say that Joe's a terrible writer. The man is excellent at dialogues. Easily one of the best right now. Which is why I find it a little weird for someone who has read an entire trilogy of this grim dark fantasy to come up with offensive LGBT depictions as the biggest concern.

    • @jonm2416
      @jonm2416 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sounds like a typical snowflake looking for attention to me. Who are they to judge Shev's sexuality?

    • @rubberduckiedogs
      @rubberduckiedogs ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I have to agree. It’s been a bit since I read the first trilogy so I’m possibly forgetting some scenes or dialogue, but claiming offensive LGBT depictions are one of the main issues with the books feels like it’s totally out of left field. 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @namjoonssexybrain1679
      @namjoonssexybrain1679 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah I’d be more concerned with the rampant misogyny and terribly written female characters, those issues are much more prevalent.

  • @lowcostiqchasm3226
    @lowcostiqchasm3226 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    One of my all time favourites is The Fionavar Tapestry by Guy Gavriel Kay. Guy Kay is the legend who helped Christopher Tolkien assemble The Silmarillion and the Fionavar Tapestry is stunning. Criminally underated.

    • @SonofSethoitae
      @SonofSethoitae 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      His Sarantine Mosaic duology and Lions of al-Rassan stand-alone are also incredible.
      GGK is in a weird place where he's beloved by the people who've read him, but almost nobody has it seems. Certainly few of those who have care to talk about it.

  • @jandnorton
    @jandnorton 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    How is the Sword of Truth series not on this list!?

    • @stefvanroey8191
      @stefvanroey8191 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe cuz its not an unpopular opinion anymore at this point?

  • @Brendanstop
    @Brendanstop 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I read SoC without reading the Grisha trilogy and I was able to catch onto the magic system after about 100 pages. But I did almost dnf it in those 100 pages because i was so lost. 😂

  • @neet3691
    @neet3691 4 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    Thank God 'Lord of the Rings' was not there.

  • @MerrilyKristin
    @MerrilyKristin 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Consider my feathers ruffled 😂 Name of the Wind is my favorite book of all time. But I’m curious to see if that could possibly change as I’ve been delving into more adult fantasy!

  • @jeremydanchuk1897
    @jeremydanchuk1897 5 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    For me I found Mistborn over hyped, was not bad but I really struggled in the last book. Also Night Angel by Brent Weeks, good but not great.

    • @BlackXSunlight
      @BlackXSunlight 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      God I feel the same way about Way of King

    • @joshrivers5191
      @joshrivers5191 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I've read mistborn series but not stormlight yet. Loved mistborn but didn't think it was as good as the Game of Thrones books. Maybe stormlight will change my mind.
      I think soft magic systems are better than hard magic systems though I did enjoy what Sanderson did with the mistborn magic.
      3rd book was actually my favorite haha.

    • @colin1818
      @colin1818 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The second book for me really drags. The third book did a little as well. But the first one (The Final Empire) is exceptional. Overall I loved how it ended though.

  • @jbcox85
    @jbcox85 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I have to say that of all Sanderson's books, I enjoyed them all, that I was the least impressed by mistborn. Interesting concept and all, bad guy wins builds evil empire, but if I'm being honest it felt like most of the book was just a description of the magic being used.

  • @ricbish4122
    @ricbish4122 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I couldn't finish Lies of Locklemora, just couldn't get into it! I'm kinda curious that you said in this video you didn't find Name of the Wind that great but yet you put it in your top Adult Fantasy books! What's up w that? Oh and just wondering what are those books lined up on your bottom shelf to care right? A whole bunch, is that anime? Thx

    • @ebnovels
      @ebnovels  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s not top fantasy, it’s just popular fantasy :) And I think you’re referring to Vagabond.

    • @ricbish4122
      @ricbish4122 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ebnovels Gotcha, your right sorry about that. What's Vagabond about? Is that anime or regular book?

  • @BlackWolfCosplay
    @BlackWolfCosplay 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I had an issue with Throne of Glass too, I bought the first 3 on a recommendation but have only managed to get through the first one, I feel like i probably would have loved it as a teen but being older I felt that it read like fanfic, I actually liked most of it, the world/story and other characters I didn't mind... it was the main character who was just so typical of so many OCs in fanfic. I think it has a place, and I can see it being popular with some people but it just wasn't for me personally

    • @AmberMarrrie
      @AmberMarrrie 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Black Wolf Cosplay I despise the main character. The first book is basic af.

  • @toiletteregina
    @toiletteregina 5 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    honestly I’ve always though of Maas’ books as smut disguised as fantasy :---)

    • @TheFran2555
      @TheFran2555 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agreed 😂😂😂😂

    • @cussundriakneal9904
      @cussundriakneal9904 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That's very fair. Its a glorified erotica book. XD

    • @allysondawahare9229
      @allysondawahare9229 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      toiletteregina they are actually very good books

    • @toiletteregina
      @toiletteregina 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bubblebearpanda 2004 i plan on reading her ACOTAR series! ......if only for the smut LOL

    • @JMV1616
      @JMV1616 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      toiletteregina it’s just the same scene written over and over with the same wording and horrible ass writing.

  • @weerwolfje99
    @weerwolfje99 5 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    First law trilogy is brilliantly written. Might not be for you but badly written??!?? What on earth do you read to dare to say that...?!

    • @LolItsADaniel
      @LolItsADaniel 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I thought it was actually quite badly written. At least, the first book was for sure. It's been years since I've read it, but it drove me away from fantasy for about a year. Not only did I not like the first book, I thought it was badly written in certain parts. No, I can't give any examples and I know I should. I'd have to dig my copy out from storage and go through it. Maybe the other two books moved the trilogy in a good direction, but the first book was one of the worst fantasy novels I've read.

    • @jbcox85
      @jbcox85 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree with @meepsel. You may not like the book but I don't see how you could knock the writing. Also I don't remember anything in this book that portrayed LGBTQ in anyway, maybe I forgot

    • @Vermbraunt
      @Vermbraunt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@jbcox85 It has one lesbian character, Queen Terez. Honesty there is nothing wrong with how she is depicted but there is a scene where Glokta figures out that she is a lesbian and that is why she will not sleep with her husband King Jezal and he threatens to have her mistress gang-raped if she doesn't produce 4 heirs (he also has her arrested as insurance). Which is another example of how brutal Glokta is but we already knew that but I don't think it is a bad depiction of her

    • @slowerpicker
      @slowerpicker 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I love The First Law trilogy (tbh, 2/3 still need to read the last one). The plotting and pacing is outta the park.

    • @Vermbraunt
      @Vermbraunt 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@slowerpicker I personally think the 3rd one is the best. The character twists are amazing

  • @Raistlin7070
    @Raistlin7070 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Interesting, I have read Name of the Wind and Wise Man's Fear about 3 times. Want to read it again when I have time. I wonder what people look for in a good book. Part of its beauty for me is in the little things that you pick up on your 2nd or 3rd read. For example 7 words that make a woman fall in love with you.. and on additional reads you see all the times Kvothe employed that. It's like a little Easter Egg, and there are many many more you find upon a close read. You should've spent more time blasting Dark Tower though. That was absolutely horrendous for most of it.

  • @Kaivijs
    @Kaivijs 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I just finished Broken Earth trilogy (the Fifth season) and I too felt quite uncomfortable reading in second person. But I strongly suggest pushing through, because the story that get's told through the books is beautiful, though provoking and by the second book I was toatly into it.

    • @lexwaldez
      @lexwaldez 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I bought the entire series for a long stay in the hospital. There I was... trapped with three books I couldn't get thru. I know it's me, but I found Broken Earth unreadable.

    • @silverx_1848
      @silverx_1848 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lexwaldez I've just dnf'd fifth season a little over half way. Googled the plot summary and I'm really not missing anything. We don't even get the resolutions I wanted in this book

  • @lilschwertens5936
    @lilschwertens5936 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    so lucky that no lotr shaming was in here
    i kinda hate myself for it but startet this vid like :
    imma smack the hell of the one that criticises my lord

    • @jacob5029
      @jacob5029 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sparlio, the first book is boring. Didn’t bother finishing it either. It’s just too slow.

    • @jimstormcrow
      @jimstormcrow 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indeed. It was exactly what I expected. Glad that I was wrong.

    • @JacksonOwex
      @JacksonOwex 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I won't shame it but I REALLY don't get why so many say it's the end-all-be-all of Fantasy

    • @forestelf3585
      @forestelf3585 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Agreed, Tolkien is top tier. Personally, I don't think too many fantasy books come close in terms of literary merit--theres something to be said about the sophistication of his prose, well-developed poetry, and close attention to linguistic complexity that's unfortunately lacking in much of modern fantasy imo

    • @glodeanuandrei400
      @glodeanuandrei400 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jacob5029 thats probably because Tolkien decided to publish the whole series as a single book (which he did). It was later broken down cuz it was too big

  • @docholliday1830
    @docholliday1830 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    She said she's waiting for GRRM to finish GoT before she starts reading the series? Ummm...

  • @lullabie18
    @lullabie18 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does anyone know where I can listen to the outro song?

  • @Jathiel88
    @Jathiel88 5 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    The Sword of Truth series by Terry Goodkind. Bad one dimensional characters and plot dead ends that take up almost entire books. So many encounters just blew my suspension of disbelief out of the water.

    • @douglasdea637
      @douglasdea637 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I read the whole series and it starts off well but goes far down hill. The last 3 books are almost unreadable.

    • @blackhawksfan2525
      @blackhawksfan2525 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I read it a long time ago, and it was one of the first fantasy novels I finished.... At the time I liked Wizards First Rule. But even at that point, I thought the next book was junk (and I never read beyond it). I tried to read it again a couple years ago, and couldn't get through two chapters. For a guy who thinks so highly of himself, Goodkind is not a good writer.

    • @Deodoto
      @Deodoto 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Douglas Dea I agree. Couldnt finish the series

    • @jessi4894
      @jessi4894 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      By blowing your suspension of disbelief out of the water, are you talking about the chicken that isn't a chicken, the woman that was identified as evil because of her lack of nipples, the time Kahlan got naked and painted herself white and rode past the army to distract them, the part where they literally lick toads to enter the spirit world, or the time Richard carves a block of marble into a statue using a sword to teach the power of capitalisim and goes on a 10+ page diatribe ripped straight from Atlas Shrugged?

    • @joshuacollins9346
      @joshuacollins9346 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I loved SoT when I was 14. Tried to reread as an adult this year and made it about 10 chapters. Between the instalove and one of the worst Gary Stu MCs I've seen, it really really fails to hold up.

  • @ArchPendragon
    @ArchPendragon 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Year: 2031, "Well guys i can finally say what I think about Winds of Winter" but ill wait till the rest is out

  • @Realus7
    @Realus7 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Surprised Terry Goodkind "Wizard's First Rule" isn't on here.

    • @Adamdidit
      @Adamdidit 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      something has to by hyped first

    • @floodedcarb7028
      @floodedcarb7028 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Adamdidit It was hyped, over a decade ago. After all they did make a even worse tv series based on the books.

    • @Adamdidit
      @Adamdidit 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@floodedcarb7028 i rwd the damn thing almost 20 years ago and I don't remember it being all that hyped then either.

    • @floodedcarb7028
      @floodedcarb7028 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@Adamdidit Ok.... Just because you're unaware or don't remember any hype of a book you read. Doesn't mean there never was any.

    • @Adamdidit
      @Adamdidit 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@floodedcarb7028 You're right obviously. I'm just totally flaberagasted that it ever existed. Did they read it?

  • @NickIHall
    @NickIHall 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I know it's not a popular topic online, but what did you think of the sword of truth series? Terry Goodkind. I know he lost it at the end, but I did like the story of the first few books. Why does erfgrond hate his writing? (we understand why we hate him, though)
    And also, David Eddings? Belgariad.
    These are two series of novels I've always returned to... Have I just not found better book series that appeal to me?

  • @saffron6661
    @saffron6661 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    anyone know what book(s) that is in the bottom right corner? looks like a manga (demon slayer idk?) I maybe wrong. The cover looks intresting(yes I do judge a book by its cover...sometimes not haha)

    • @ebnovels
      @ebnovels  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Vagabond? Is that what you’re asking about? :)

    • @saffron6661
      @saffron6661 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ebnovels Yea I think so. To be more specific, the one where the spine of the book has it numbered in red.

  • @nina_gc
    @nina_gc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Sadly the HP one. I feel like i can't even bring myself to enjoy it because its so overhyped and maybe it's just in my personal experience but most of the time the people that overhype it are the ones that only saw the movies and didn't read the book. *waiting for the hate comments 😣*

    • @salomekekelia1508
      @salomekekelia1508 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No u r fine
      I read it once aka my teacher forced the entire class to read it
      I tried to re-read
      Trudged through 1st book put down 2nd halfway through

    • @LadyMoonNugz184
      @LadyMoonNugz184 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I won the whole series from a raffle ticket event from my old school years ago. Was surprised and excited at the time. After stopping at book five, I had to give it away. My interest in the books had dropped. I'll still watch the movies but I couldn't finish the books.

    • @TitoTimTravels
      @TitoTimTravels 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I like the books much more than the movies, but yeah, it is over-hyped. I have been an avid reader for 40 years and as much as I enjoy the books - there is little in them that is original. The best thing she did was merging the magic and non-magic world in current day. That worked pretty well, generally. And I still tend to reread the series once a year. 😎

    • @stallgastgivargarden1224
      @stallgastgivargarden1224 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      HP did more for me when I was 13 than when I was 30, but I still think it's pretty decent as far as books go.

  • @robpaul7544
    @robpaul7544 5 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    No book is for everyone, and likewise no book is for no-one. We can just be mature about it and respect an opinion 👍
    Currently reading The Magicians by Grossman.. holy smokes what a dumpster fire 😂
    Had to get that off my chest.
    Dark Tower is weird in many ways - only devout King readers might glean the meaning out of it.. and even many of them might hate it. I liked it . But I'm weird.
    Martin is definitely overrated, but then I feel the same way about Sanderson - comparing the two doesn't add much.
    Harry Potter was a beloved book read by many impressionable youths who are now active on platforms like this, and has been overhyped for so long - along with the movies. I never got the hype, but if people love it, let them. I do think it got a lot more people into reading fantasy, and that's always a win in my book.

    • @wordragon
      @wordragon 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rob Paul -I agree. Sanderson’s writing is juvenile.

  • @ao7239
    @ao7239 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What book series is bottom right corner (7-10)?

  • @guruthosamarthruin4459
    @guruthosamarthruin4459 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I tried to read Shannara, but quickly found that I didn't care, at all, about anything that was happening, and I gave up on it.

  • @amandahuang4850
    @amandahuang4850 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Unpopular opinion: I liked Six of Crows but didn’t LOVE it like everyone else did, it was just okay. I think sadly Leigh Bardugo just isn’t the author for me

  • @KellyPatootie
    @KellyPatootie 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Anyway who is thinking of picking up Circe I highly recommend the audiobook!! The narrator has a beautiful voice and does a great job. Completely changes the experience.

    • @AmberMarrrie
      @AmberMarrrie 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kelly Ribellia thanks

    • @samjohnson7869
      @samjohnson7869 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't care for the lord of the rings books. I've tried reading them 3 times and can't get thru them. Maybe seeing the movies first ruined it for me...

  • @sngore1
    @sngore1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So I read Six of Crows without the Grisha Trilogy and I still loved it! I was treated like an intelligent reader about the magic and I love that in my magic books, something Sanderson does well is that show and not info dump magic and thats how Six of Crows was for me. I then wanted to read Grisha after SOC but couldn't stick through it (personal preference thing, no hate on it), so I am glad I read SOC first cause otherwise I may have never gotten to it.

  • @blackhawksfan2525
    @blackhawksfan2525 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A Song of Ice and Fire isn't for everyone. It's long, dark, brutal, and at times there are too many characters and plots going on at once (some of them are even boring). But to say Sanderson is a better writer than GRR Martin is an atrocity.

  • @billuraral1870
    @billuraral1870 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I tried reading Wheel of Time and gave up at chapter 1. I felt like I ran a damn marathon trying to get throught.

    • @michaelshort2388
      @michaelshort2388 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Chatper 1 or the prologue? I do agree that the prologue of book 1 is diffilcult to get through at first. I actually skipped it on my first read through but now that i've read the rest I appreciate t much more.

    • @mikaelhauk
      @mikaelhauk 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Rebeccadmd No, that's Brian Sanderson.

    • @mikaelhauk
      @mikaelhauk 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Rebeccadmd Whatever his name is.

  • @thetechtron9465
    @thetechtron9465 4 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    I honestly feel Andrzej Sapkowski is still underrated

    • @lordfreerealestate8302
      @lordfreerealestate8302 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      OMG yes. I've started Part 2 of Last Wish and so far I'm liking it even better than Martin of Jordan. Most people know him only for the games but I'm hoping with the launch of the Netflix series more people will be drawn to the books.

    • @Gdog637
      @Gdog637 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Diarrhea Sharts his books are top 10(#1 included) on Amazon this week so that’s a good sign

    • @mikaelhauk
      @mikaelhauk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Most overrated fantasy series by far...

    • @ayayay9587
      @ayayay9587 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mikaelhauk good joke buddy

    • @mikaelhauk
      @mikaelhauk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ayayay9587 No, really. I like the short stories well enough, but the main series is shit.

  • @learning2727
    @learning2727 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I probably shouldn't comment on The Blade Itself (since I'm only 1/4 of the way in). But wow, this is tough going. The dialogue is generally just bad-if one more character says "Argh..." I'm going to have to put the book down for a bit. The descriptions are odd, or sometimes completely contradicting-even within the same paragraph.
    I'm hopeful that it improves, but that's mainly because I got the First Law trilogy at a really good price. Otherwise, I probably would have given up. The Logen chapters are approaching terrible.
    Does it get better...ever?

  • @whiteraven562
    @whiteraven562 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I didn't read the Grisha trilogy before Six of Crows and I was able to follow along just fine. Maybe I would've had a more in-depth understanding if I had, but I really didn't feel like I was missing anything.

  • @jenniferpeterson530
    @jenniferpeterson530 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I agree with some of these, Name of the wind was so disappointing. Hero of Ages was actually my favorite of the mistborn series and I LOVED The Fifth season. I do get why some people didn’t like The Fifth season at first it was hard to get into the writing style but once I got used to it it was really good. Very unique plot, world and characters, o thought it was outstanding. I also really liked The Priory of the orange tree, a few places were slow but overall I thought it was a fun read.

    • @gilesclone
      @gilesclone 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I also loved Fifth Season. But I get why some people don’t. If you are the type of reader who has to understand everything that is going on all the time, you will have a hard time with this. I also don’t mind second person perspective if used right, and I feel this made sense here.

  • @SlowpokeReads
    @SlowpokeReads 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    this is why im reading grisha triology before six of crows. the world building is so immense in this series i cant imagine her repeating everything in six of crows which is why im surprised people say you dont HAVE to read it before. Plus, its not a terrible story or characters.

  • @Eyeneedcash
    @Eyeneedcash 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would love for you to review my book. Can I send you a copy? It’s urban fantasy. My first book in the series.

  • @wjones28
    @wjones28 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I gotta reread mistborn, I saw it as overrated for a little while but I've been thinking about it lately and wondering "is it?"

  • @annier8514
    @annier8514 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I never read the Grisha trilogy before Six of Crows, and I was never confused. I love the SoC duology so much. I’m trying to get into the Grisha trilogy, I don’t know what’s holding me back though, I’ve really liked what I’ve read of Shadow and Bone.

  • @pugshorty9852
    @pugshorty9852 5 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    The Song of Fire and Ice(Game of Thrones) is EPIC!

    • @clauricaune
      @clauricaune 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Books 4 & 5 are kinda annoying, though.

    • @harryworley2929
      @harryworley2929 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      clauricaune brave of you to speak the truth

    • @fredrikgranstrom6743
      @fredrikgranstrom6743 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@clauricaune yup

    • @enaidealukal9203
      @enaidealukal9203 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@clauricaune as is the fact that the bastard is so in love with being a famous TV producer now that he's never going to bother finishing the series. He could have been remembered for decades and decades for writing an all-time great fiction series.. instead he'll be remembered for a few years for having made a cool HBO show.

    • @Profficer1979
      @Profficer1979 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@clauricaune Book 4 is my least favourite but book 5 is decent.

  • @BrilliantCookiebaker
    @BrilliantCookiebaker 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I read the Six of Crows duology before the Grisha trilogy (haven't read it yet) and I had no problems with understanding the magic system or world building. I think I would have understood more of the references to the war and other countries and generally the plot of the Grisha trilogy that was mentioned but it didn't bother me and I figured out the most important stuff as the books went on.

  • @SamObigbesan
    @SamObigbesan 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I do agree with your husband about the Harry Potter series, although I love it and as well as it being my kind of gateway series into modern fantasy, I still don't think it's my favourite, other than for nostalgiaS sake. Still remember reading it in braille under the desc when I was supposed to be studying maths or some such. I can see how it can be a comfort read to some however. On that note, I hope my mates aren't going to see this comment, as I might have some very awkward explanations to give. Also, what's the music piece at the end of your videos called? I've been meaning to ask you.

    • @ebnovels
      @ebnovels  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s just something on my editing software! I’m sorry 😅

  • @Mhidraum
    @Mhidraum 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I'm at book nine of WoT, and my feelings are a bit mixed. There's some characters I LOVE, some that's a bit meh, and others again that I absolutely hate (and not in a love-to-hate way). The cringy love quadrangle should also have been cut completely...

    • @ebnovels
      @ebnovels  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hahaha, you mean you’re not a fan of someone having three wives?!? 🤣

    • @antonioiglesias2031
      @antonioiglesias2031 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ebnovels No thanks, that just greedy... I'm good with my one LOL.
      Totally agree with the cringy comment. Maybe it's wish fulfillment by author, but more likely product of his time (Conan from 1980's, WOT from 1990's) which I believe makes his writing feel dated and not in a good way.

    • @Mhidraum
      @Mhidraum 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ebnovels Not really, but I didn't like the way it was handled with Rand. His entire relationship and "marriage" with Aviendha and (especially) Elayne feels forced and awkward. I think it would have worked much better with Min as main love interest, and Aviendha and Elayne as something more short term.

    • @kristianwatt7966
      @kristianwatt7966 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      While at times the 4-way relationship thing seems a bit awkward in the books, Robert Jordan was actually extremely ahead of his time in terms of theme. Polyamory is only now beginning to experience mainstream acceptance and legitimacy. Rand isn’t some brainwashing polygamist forcing young girls into marriage. Each of the four are consenting adults who honestly love each other and, while not explicitly stated, it can be reasonably inferred that Elayne and Avienda are to some extent sexually involved. There’s absolutely nothing ‘cringy’ about a group of consenting adults wanting to enter a sexual and loving relationship together. WoT woke AF

    • @Mhidraum
      @Mhidraum 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@kristianwatt7966 I didn't express myself clearly... I didn't mean that Rand forced Elayne and Aviendha into anything, but that their undying love for him doesn't have enough of a foundation for me to believe in it. Elayne hardly spent any time at all with him before he left Tear, and Aviendha seemed quite adamant that she wanted to end it after their one-night-stand in Seanchan. I can believe in both as teenage flings, but not much more. Min is the only one I think really works with Rand because they actually spent a decent amount of time together, and worked together as partners and friends.

  • @germangarcia6118
    @germangarcia6118 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I do agree with the Wheel of Time, haha. It's just that at some point the characters start moving from one place to another and the story never moves forward until Sanderson comes in to finish it.

    • @DragonHeart613
      @DragonHeart613 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Wheel of Time never moves forward until Sanderson comes in to finish the series? That's pretty harsh. I agree that parts of the books could've been shortened but implying that Robert Jordan never truly progressed the story & that it only got good once Sanderson took over is a serious disservice to Mr Jordan & his magnum opus.

    • @germangarcia6118
      @germangarcia6118 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DragonHeart613 First: I don't say it never got good before Sanderson. It was very good in the first books. Second: I don't have any reason to service Jordan. He had good and bad things, like most writers.

  • @sophiasthoughts
    @sophiasthoughts 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Totally agree about Priory. I think it's a great entry level to epic fantasy as it's just on the border between high and epic. Big world, big cast of characters, quite a few perspectives and lots of politics but the plot was fairly basic and the magic system was very soft. The majority of the focus was on lore. So, for seasoned epic fantasy readers, I don't think it's complex enough. But if you go in expecting high fantasy instead you will probably enjoy it. Plus, dragons and I know how you feel about them 😏😉 hope that helps 😊

  • @JMAN-pg4tg
    @JMAN-pg4tg 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Harry Potter for sure. I understand that many people love the series, but I don't understand the extent of the hype. It often gets put on a pedestal. I have no idea why.
    Edit: Eragon. My wife loves those books, but I have no idea why. I didn't even make it halfway through the first one. It was so boring and generic.

  • @sorenkrane
    @sorenkrane 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Your commentary was fantastic. Each example you used was good.

  • @tyd2877
    @tyd2877 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    You should def do a part 2!
    Nevernight was completely overrated. I DNF'd. I was bored the entire time.

    • @ebnovels
      @ebnovels  5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Haha, I’m not hating it! 😆

    • @tyd2877
      @tyd2877 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ebnovels HAHA

  • @nikkiesona
    @nikkiesona 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I got Six of Crows for free from a library event. I didn't know it was connected to another series until now. I guess now I have to read a trilogy to read a book I own. At least I haven't started it yet.

  • @robertdrinkwater7944
    @robertdrinkwater7944 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just finished well of ascension. I'm looking forward to starting hero of ages

    • @ebnovels
      @ebnovels  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yay, I hope you love it :D

  • @Lilac-and-Gooseberries
    @Lilac-and-Gooseberries 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Throne of Glass series is definitely overhyped, it’s not awful though. The books do get much better as the series goes along, I admit I struggled with the first book because I found quite a few elements frustrating and also forced to move the plot along. Glad I stuck with it though, it’s fun but not the masterpiece the hype says.

    • @karkatvantas9557
      @karkatvantas9557 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Nah it gets worse after Heir of Fire. Literally all the male characters are the same (disgusting, possessive, creepy, territorial) person copy and pasted. And the female characters barely have differences. And Aelin and Rowan are completely insufferable. None of the romances have any chemistry. And for a series that supposedly features a global empire, it's ridiculously white. At least that's how it was in Empire of Storms, which is where I decided to DNF the series.
      Throne of Glass was passable.
      The Assassin's Blade was fun.
      Crown of Midnight was excellent.
      Heir of Fire was good.
      Queen of Shadows it was easy to ignore the problems piling up.
      Empire of Storms was the straw that broke the camel's back.
      I wanted to keep reading because the plot was interesting and I wanted to see how it would resolve, but I just don't care about any of the characters.

  • @marybutt9239
    @marybutt9239 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    You thankfully didn’t mention Lord of the Rings.

    • @samjohnson7869
      @samjohnson7869 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      She should have. Definitely overrated

  • @bigbtb
    @bigbtb 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've been on a streak of popular books where I don't see the wow factor that they seem to have for other people but that's okay because sometimes they really are worth it. Wheel of Time's first book took me way too long to read and was so taxing for what it is but I almost feel like I want to keep trying. I had read the first LOTR book just before and had a very similar experience. I've just completed The Toll ( arc of the scythe) and again I'm left wondering what I missed. I didn't hate any of them but they just weren't satisfying for me.

  • @vizar1337
    @vizar1337 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I liked WOT but you had to really power through the first couple books to get into it. That, and it is telling that the book I likes the most was the one ghost written by Brandon Sanderson. It was actually from that book that I went on to read the rest of Sandersons stuff.

  • @anjalyjacob1570
    @anjalyjacob1570 5 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    All Sarah J Maas books have never ever lived up to the hype. All her characters are the same, the magic system is boring

    • @Vickynger
      @Vickynger 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      plus messy, lazy world building... (imo.)

    • @anjalyjacob1570
      @anjalyjacob1570 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Vickynger Yes agreed!

  • @SysterYster
    @SysterYster 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I tried reading Wheel of Time once... didn't even get through the first book, I was so bored. XD George Martin's GoT had me super hooked though. :O So agree with the Harry Potter books too. They are good books. I like them. But they are not "amazing". Dark Tower was good, but a bit confusing and very depressing at times. I think it might be a bit too long as well. XD
    Side-note. Fantasy or erotica? Doesn't that person understand that ANY genre can be erotica? Just like ANY genre can be horror, or action, or adventure? Erotica is not a genre.

  • @cirac7508
    @cirac7508 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love children of blood and bone but something was just unnecessary like the romance. Its feel like evey fantasy I'm reading have romance in it(which isn't wrong I like a good romance) but its seem like the romance takes over and the war that's happen right now come second. My opinion but I feel like not ever fantasy need a romance or end game is everybody end up with everybody in the group. Can I just have a good fantasy with some romance but the main character don't have to lose themselves or start doing dumb thing the minute they get with someone or just a strong friendship or a strong brother and sister relationship with parents involved

    • @Newfiecat
      @Newfiecat 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes please! There's so much overemphasis on romantic relationships it's almost like family and friend relationships get completely ignored.

    • @cirac7508
      @cirac7508 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Newfiecat yes or killing off family to make the characters story strong or don't have to really answer questions about where they at or why a happen

  • @annafirnen4815
    @annafirnen4815 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh yeah I made this mistake and read Six Of Crows before The Grisha Trilogy. People said it was ok and also I couldn't find the whole trilogy in my language because they stopped printing it since different publishing company bought the rights for distribution and only NOW they will publish it again (waiting for my Shadow and Bone now). OH BOY I was so lost for the first half of the book. But later I definitely got used to the world and everything and I thoroughly enjoyed this duology. Minus the major spoiler to the Grisha Trilogy but oh well...

  • @michaelwright6702
    @michaelwright6702 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Anything by Sanderson. I know it's an unpopular opinion, but I think his dialogue is sometimes cringeworthy and his prose is terrible. I like his magic systems and worldbuilding, but overall his books are average at best. Again, just my opinion.

    • @alishareadsrambles98
      @alishareadsrambles98 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I completely agree with you. I know a lot of people really like Sanderson, but I have read two of his books and I didn't really like either of them so I have given up. Hahaha. His books are just not for me.

    • @ebnovels
      @ebnovels  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I’m obviously on the other side of the fence 💁🏻‍♀️

    • @chriatopher0224
      @chriatopher0224 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, I really disliked that he was chosen to finish the wheel of time. Always thought his stuff reads like fan-fiction.

  • @darkportents9835
    @darkportents9835 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Regarding First Law Trilogy: each book is better than the one before, and the standalones are masterpieces.

    • @PerikleZ87
      @PerikleZ87 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      And the new series is even better :D

  • @notthebeastinus2786
    @notthebeastinus2786 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bro, I just looked at the books on the shelves and you got the Seven Realms books up there. One of my favorite series. It was also the series that go me into fantasy. I just saw the Codex Alera series and that's another favorite

  • @florianneumann9441
    @florianneumann9441 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    what are the 'samurai' books with the red numbers in the background?

    • @ebnovels
      @ebnovels  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Vagabond :)

    • @florianneumann9441
      @florianneumann9441 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ebnovels k, thx - sounds interesting, is it a novel/manga... Kann u give me author too please, to much results on Google :) Guess l will be still reading 'Lone Wolf and Cub' over the next year anyway. All the best - nice bookworm channel!

  • @DoReMi123acb
    @DoReMi123acb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I have never read a Harry Potter book. I don't feel like I am missing much.

    • @damonke79
      @damonke79 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Um. You are.

    • @NerdyDude186
      @NerdyDude186 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You really aren't

    • @damonke79
      @damonke79 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@NerdyDude186 The Harry Potter series is essentially modern day Dickens. Kids 150 years from now will still be reading the series. Whether you like it or not, they are equally as impactful as Lord of the Rings. Timeless.

    • @NerdyDude186
      @NerdyDude186 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      damonke79 The series is not that good. You can say its good but idc it's my opinion. Also Lord of the Rings is the definition of age old trash. It's overhyped. I don't care for LotR. People only read that and say they read fantasy. It's idiotic. People praise it like it's the end all of fantasy. It's not it's the inspiration for a genre. That doesn't mean I have to like it. Harry Potter is pretty bad. I used to love that shit. Last 4 books i was at midnight releases and would talk ears off of everyone. Then I started reading good fantasy. I grew out of Harry Potter faster than a fat kid finishes a cake. It's not that great. I recently listened to the series. It was a pain in the ass to get through because I was bored listening to it. The dialogue is weak the story is bland and tired and its great... FOR CHILDREN. As an adult it's pretty bad.

    • @damonke79
      @damonke79 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@NerdyDude186 I'm not saying it's the end all be all but I do think it's an amazing entryway for kids to get into the genre.
      Like what you like but the impact of the Harry Potter series is undeniable at this point. Is there better? Of course. What I'm saying is that in terms of just pure influence and impact on the genre as a whole, the HP series is huge. You can't tell a story about the genre without Harry Potter getting a chapter, therefore, I think it's wrong to tell someone they aren't missing anything.
      They are actually missing a lot.

  • @HighShepherdLopes
    @HighShepherdLopes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I tried reading lot of the rings in HS and that shit was SO BORING I got to the part where they met beorne and quit it. Since then I've found that Silmarillion is more my style. Lore and Mythos style writing is definitely my favorite out of all others

  • @petek930
    @petek930 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Has anyone read a book titled: "5 and the end of magic". I believe was made for young adults, but it works for adults as well. I'd love to see a review on that one.

  • @sydneyfrost2703
    @sydneyfrost2703 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I haven’t read ACOTAR yet, but it was originally marketed and sold as New Adult, not YA so it was geared towards older people (think college-aged). However, New Adult never took off like publishers were hoping, so instead New Adult books ended up in the romance section or YA section despite being its own genre/age category. This is why, despite the sexually explicit scenes on Mass’s books, they technically aren’t YA and are meant for readers over 18 years old.

    • @ebnovels
      @ebnovels  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I know *sigh*
      The sigh is not toward you, btw, just toward the situation. I don’t know why they didn’t put them in Adult since NA isn’t really an option.

    • @sydneyfrost2703
      @sydneyfrost2703 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Elliot Brooks I completely agree!
      However, I’ve seen a lot of discussion around this and then it gets into the issue of-how much responsibility do publishers/bookstores have towards ensuring that books like ACOTAR are properly grouped together?! I know people who have worked in bookstores and have gone up to parents to tell them that the book their ~14 year old is holding (ACOTAR) is probably not the best book them despite being in the YA section. But then, because it is technically NA and not YA, is it the responsibility of the parents - and possibly bookstores - to check what their children are reading and not the publishers, since it technically is classified as NA?! It also caused issues with the exclusive ACOTAR book-box that was marketed as 18+ and was very explicit in content. These boxes did fall into the hands of those under 18 years old, but the box was marketed as 18+ so can responsibility fall on the company? Is classifying the the box 18+ enough on the companies part? Especially considering many people consider ACOTAR YA?
      Personally, I don’t think the publishers/the book-box company are responsible. The book is classified as NA and the box was 18+. Also, at the end of the day, it is a parents responsibility to ensure that what their child is reading is acceptable to their standards (personally, my mom wouldn’t have cared if I read those books at that age, but other parents do).

  • @vellichor7676
    @vellichor7676 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Going to be upfront: I kind of hated Name of the Wind. Only book I've ever tossed across the room.

  • @demongoose666
    @demongoose666 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think once enough people say that something is ‘overrated’ it’s not really ‘overrated’ anymore.
    Example: throne of glass. Literally everyone says that book is overhyped but the ratio of people on booktube who didn’t like that book to people that did is like 10:1.

    • @ebnovels
      @ebnovels  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hahaha, I agree 😆

  • @kaitlinschneider845
    @kaitlinschneider845 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I really enjoyed Priory of the Orange Tree! I think I would qualify it as more character driven than plot driven at times, so maybe that's why the person who responded didn't feel like anything happened? I would definitely recommend it!

  • @lavendermarshmallowplant3229
    @lavendermarshmallowplant3229 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I understood and LOVED Six Of Crows well enough without any prior knowledge of the Grishaverse. In fact, it piqued my interest for the trilogy, despite a ton of folks saying they prefer the duology. I'm onto the second book (but only 4 chapters in) and I'm really enjoying it so far. Maybe it's because I haven't read CK in over 2 years, so a lot of the plot and a lot of my feelings towards it have blurred over time (I remember firmly loving it though), but I think I'm enjoying the trilogy more. It could also be because it's a lot more...magical? I'll have to reread it once (when/if) I finish the trilogy to reassess my opinions...
    When, or maybe if, my copy of the first book is returned...