Yes the Globe article is incorrect. Suncor’s plan was to process the first barrels of oil in late 2017 which was completed. On Jan. 29/18 they announced the successful start up of the first (of 3) secondary extraction units and expect the full 190,000 bbls/day production to be achieved by the end of 2018.
Globe and Mail BC edition, May 20, 2019 (Happy May Long Weekend) "Looser rules eyed for oil-sands wastewater" subtitle "Ottawa, Alberta (sic) drafting regulations for discharge of treated effluent into the Athabasca River by 2022 as industry develops technology." besides the need for an ampersand, instead of a comma between Ottawa and Alberta, there's a lot of need for this article. It needs more coverage! I care not about technological marvels if they are used to justify the intentional destruction of the environment. Package the contamination. Literally sending it downstream is not a solution. Constantly scoffing at attempts to save sensitive habitats while bankrupting the people who are concerned will only destroy the global food and water supply. The staunch refusal to seriously engage in energy alternatives and habitat restoration is a stain on everything Canadian. When Syncrude was fined $3M for the death of 1600 ducks, did the money buy new ducks? No. Charging money to allow pollouting only encourages people to profit from pollouting in a different way. I don't care if you get Han Solo to sign off on the Carbon tax. Does Ottawa plan on throwing its fiat currency bank notes into the air to filter out pollution? Exactly how does charging money solve the problem? If there was a plan with a known cost, I would understand. There is no plan and Ottawa is only getting further into debt with its current plans. Buying the Transmountian pipeline at the price JT paid, makes the whole project unprofitable and more difficult to stop. The idea of not wasting the money paid is so strong that people don't want to cut cost. They would rather cut off their nose to spite their face. Charging more money for production is not a deterrent for companies that can just charge customers more for products. This quagmire is stifling innovations that could be used while investing in methods of energy production that are known to destroy life. Suck down another Moleson Ice and turn on NASCAR, it's time to get dumber.
late 2017 my ass, im gettin sent up there dec 1st im a carpenter,, believe me ima be there longer then late 2017
h1ph0pjunk1e lol 2018 and still nah
Yes the Globe article is incorrect. Suncor’s plan was to process the first barrels of oil in late 2017 which was completed. On Jan. 29/18 they announced the successful start up of the first (of 3) secondary extraction units and expect the full 190,000 bbls/day production to be achieved by the end of 2018.
Meanwhile back in Alberta-Nothing like a breath of Alberta Air to give you the HIGHWAY 63 BLUES th-cam.com/video/oljPxBlHyJs/w-d-xo.html
Globe and Mail BC edition, May 20, 2019 (Happy May Long Weekend) "Looser rules eyed for oil-sands wastewater" subtitle "Ottawa, Alberta (sic) drafting regulations for discharge of treated effluent into the Athabasca River by 2022 as industry develops technology." besides the need for an ampersand, instead of a comma between Ottawa and Alberta, there's a lot of need for this article. It needs more coverage! I care not about technological marvels if they are used to justify the intentional destruction of the environment. Package the contamination. Literally sending it downstream is not a solution. Constantly scoffing at attempts to save sensitive habitats while bankrupting the people who are concerned will only destroy the global food and water supply. The staunch refusal to seriously engage in energy alternatives and habitat restoration is a stain on everything Canadian. When Syncrude was fined $3M for the death of 1600 ducks, did the money buy new ducks? No. Charging money to allow pollouting only encourages people to profit from pollouting in a different way. I don't care if you get Han Solo to sign off on the Carbon tax. Does Ottawa plan on throwing its fiat currency bank notes into the air to filter out pollution? Exactly how does charging money solve the problem? If there was a plan with a known cost, I would understand. There is no plan and Ottawa is only getting further into debt with its current plans. Buying the Transmountian pipeline at the price JT paid, makes the whole project unprofitable and more difficult to stop. The idea of not wasting the money paid is so strong that people don't want to cut cost. They would rather cut off their nose to spite their face. Charging more money for production is not a deterrent for companies that can just charge customers more for products. This quagmire is stifling innovations that could be used while investing in methods of energy production that are known to destroy life. Suck down another Moleson Ice and turn on NASCAR, it's time to get dumber.