If you think about it, Prussia was able to unify Germany only because it was spared by Peter lll in 7 years war (for no good reason for Russia. Peter was such a simp he wrote letters to Frederick asking for prussian military medals). Later prussian unified Germany in WW1 caused so much damage and then sent Lenin from Switzerland, which destroyed Russian Empire. So a prussiaboo is responsible for the fall of empire.
Meh even if Russia had continued the war, I doubt prussia would have been completely dissolved as a state. Carthaginian peaces weren't really popular in Europe at that time. Most likely they would have had to cede some border territories to their neighbours.
@mappingshaman5280 I believe Prussia would have lost its Eastern territories, while being a vassal/independent in their western side, acting like a buffer state between France and Russian ambitions
It wasn't for no reason - maybe no good reason - but Peter grew up heavily antagonistic towards his mother, and as a result veered to interests which were basically the opposite of her own; shows the importance of actually being a good parent to your kids.
the really interesting case about this section of russian military history, is while they had a great many victories, most losses they do have are devastating and greatly impactful, which I find fascinating
13:20 Something similar happened with the Belgian expeditionary corps during ww1. Belgian soldiers were sent to fight alongside Russia in 1915 with armored cars. When the Russian Revolution happened they had to go back home going east, crossing all of Russia, China, the Pacific, the USA, the Atlantic and then back to Belgium. See this : en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgian_Expeditionary_Corps_in_Russia. It certainly would make a great movie.
I would like to recommend a concept for a new series you could do. The idea is that you take the place of a historical leader, and you choose what decisions to make as that historical leader based on what would be the most beneficial for the nation the historical leader you chose ruled over. The way you would go about doing this is you would base your decisions off of the knowledge you had at your disposal at the time. For example, you could do a video where you take the place of Louis XIV and you choose how you would expand the size, influence and power of France in the 17th and 18th centuries. Or you could take the place of Louis XV and decide how you could preserve the French empire in America and India. Perhaps you could even take the place of Louis XVI and decide how you could prevent the french revolution if you were in his position. A criticism you could levy at this idea is that it’s too similar to the series you’re already doing on “What if everything went perfectly for X”, but I disagree. Firstly, this series is about making decisions as a single person, not for an entire nation over the course of hundreds of years. Secondly, with your “What if everything went perfectly for X” series, you utilize the benefit of hindsight. With this series, you limit yourself to the knowledge of your chosen leader. You Don’t HAVE to do it this way, you could utilize the benefit of hindsight for this series too, but limiting yourself this way would help differentiate this series from your “What if everything went perfectly for X” series. You might as well try this idea on for a video and see how it performs. If it performs badly, you don’t have to continue it. But if it performs well, you could have another successful series on your hands. It is low risk, high reward. With how many historical leaders there are, the possibilities for this series are limitless! Some ideas for historical leaders to make videos on are Seleucus, Justinian, Louis the Pious, John I, Charles V, Phillip II of Spain, Charles XII, Peter III, Napoleon, Charles X, Napoleon III, Kaiser Wilhelm II, and so many more!
Russia actually wasnt preforming poorly in ww1 yes the great retreat was a bad situation but after that Russia did a faital blow to Osmans in battle of Erzican and Trabzond and Austria Hungary in Brusilov offensive if it hadn't been for February revolution Russia would have gotten to Warsaw as well 1917 Russia was holding the front very well battle of Marasesti as example and even gained some land battle of Zborov even the battle that Russia lost operation Albion Germany lost a lot of ships to capture an island it was internal problem that Russia had
Brusilove offensive ran out of steam and Russia was crushed when they tried an offensive in East Prussia. That was the end -Germans trashed Russian forces and the front line collapsed. Yes, Bolsheviks then made peace but, even without them, Russian position was unattainable. They lost that war.
@@mrvk39 Russian defeat in Tannberg happened before 1916 but Russia wasn't crushed by it despite hard battles of 1915 Russia choose to retreat thus saving its army from being surrounded and was able to stabilize the front by the end of the year Brusilov offensive could have been more successful if Evert chose to start his offensive in the north but despite that it was enough to destroy Austrian army Russia also had a quite successful Mitav operation at the beginning of 1917 if February revolution was unsuccessful the war would have ended by end of 1917 however despite what have happened it was a political defeat not militarily.
@@jackhardy3905 first on Brusilov front - he ran out of ammunition and out of enough troops trained by him to execute his maneuvers. He lost 500,000 in that offensive and he needed training that new recruits lacked (and most importantly junior officers that his strategy relied on to make crucial battle-time decisions). And Kerensky offensive in early 1917 was a disaster rivaling Tannenberg. ALL gains on that front and more were lost before the October Revolution. Russia lacked ammunition to continue fighting against Germany and it was German decision to shift focus away from that front because it was no longer a threat. So, both fronts were in shambles before the October Revolution. It was a military defeat as well.
@@mrvk39 Funny how they have enough amunation for civill war Karensky offensive failed because of lack of discipline not because of ammunition or weapon shortage
Yeah, our Imperial military success in definitely something to be proud of. And, if you examine these wars more closely, it was not only about quality of Russian forces at all, as some people think. At the beginning of the 19th century, for example, Russian military prestige was so high that the events of 1805-1807 were very shocking not just for the Russians but for their allies as well as Russia loosing a major war was something extraordinarily. Russian army back then was considered to be the best in Europe alongside Prussian.
Hey I have an idea (which is definitely not an original idea by any means), but what would be your take of a world map by 2100? You're my favorite mapping channel and I would love to see your take on it!
What always bugs me out is when Countries that have impressive geographical advantages and ease of access cheap traderoutes like France and UK are all teaming up on practically Locked out Russia that has to rely on freezing ports in the North or to our neighbours mercy to allow our ships through Bosporus and Dardanelles in Turkey and next in other choke points in the Mediterranean like Gibraltar and Suez to access global trade routes or on Baltic Sea routes with Danes controlling the choke points to exit it. Just because their massive empires (That occupied a half of the globe) were "afraid" of Russian influenced Balkans. And it's still continues to this day with every single country in NATO pissing their pants because of Russia. Thought it doesn't justify any war waged. By any country.
I love history and I love your channel man Glad to see you making a lot of videos constantly I always watch at least one video of yours everyday the vids are very interesting :)
I would love to see a video about the possibility of a Celtic spain, something about a world where there’s an actual Celtic “major” nation seems interesting to me
kinda was, kinda not. The decabrists pushed the agebda of Constantie taking the throne for him to become puppet emperor and with it force the constitutional monarchy for government form. All their others ideas - mostly just copypaste of regime of Napoleonic France, with primal goal of not liberties, but the benefit of national conscioness and industrialization. Also, they wanted to give Russia some more military capability and depth with changing the capital from Saint-Petersburg to Nizhniy Novgorod decabrists, in a whole were kinda based with background of scumbag rulers as Alexander 1 and Catherine th Great, who both repressed the peasentry leading to long-lasting problems with modernisation and nation consolidation in 19th century
11:45 The biggest mistake of the Russian Empire. Support a potential competitor, instead of destroying it, and gain a good ally in Hungary by holding out the rebels (But this is not a fact, but it would not be as strong as Austria-Hungary). Russia would have been able to capture Galicia and lodomerIa without any problems, and make All the Balkans its sphere of influence. This huge mistake destroyed Russia's status as a full-fledged great power in the future. Speculation: Most likely, Austria at the time of its collapse, perhaps when the Italians captured the Adriatic coast, and a war of independence would have begun in Bohemia, would have become a protectorate of Prussia, and in the future, would have become part of a single mega Germany. If everything had gone according to the scenario of the First World War, with Franco-Mega Germany, then most likely it would have been like this: 🇫🇷 France 🇷🇺 Russia (Most likely 🇭🇺 Hungary) (Great Britain 🇬🇧, if Mega Germany destroys France and Russia) VS 🇩🇪 Mega Germany (🇬🇧 British, if France and Russia destroys Mega Germany) 🇮🇹 Italy (Maybe 🇹🇷 Osman Empire)
Here's an idea I've got for a future video, what if Britain France and Israel won a decisive victory in the Suez crisis? How would this change the dynamics of the cold war?
Prussia: Hey guys! Instead of hating each other...why don't we split Poland-Lithuania among us? Russian Empire and Austrian Empire: Sounds like a Plan...We like it! Poland-Lithuania: I'm so screwed...
Tsardom of Russia be grinding thoes stats on the Poles. It's honestly preety sad seeing that Poles had preety good relations with tsar Alexander, with chances of reutring some more land back to congress Poland and the whole autonomy of congress Poland just for all of this to be swept aside by Nickolas the first.
It’s probably not possible. The Qing were suspicious of any Han revolt and refused to arm them in any way, while deep rooted bureaucracy stopped any attempts at reform.
great work as usual. I got a question for ya what do you think would have happened if the assassination attempt duing the big three meeting was successful. how would the death of all three leaders of the major allied nations affect the war effort?
Can you please do all wars: Vietnam I think vietnam is an interesting country, its has fend off all invader and never give up the spirit of independence to this day. Reckon it would be a cool video if you ever make one
you should do a vid about if yuan ShiKai didnt become president after helping the chinese republic overthrow Cixi (becasue he later crowned himself emperor and then that lead to the whole warlord era so it would be cool to see if china would have stayed unified)
16:02 This part about Iran's constitutional revolution us totally false. Russia didn't end the revolution. The constitutionalists won the Civil War and the king was exiled. He returned later but was defeated again. The Russians presence in northern Iran was the result of a secret treaty in 1907 with the British.
4:15 English grammar tip: Plurals in English never use apostrophes. Apostrophes are only used in two circumstances: a) contractions - two words being mashed into one; and b) making possessive adjectives from nouns and proper nouns - but not pronouns The proper way to write the title of this frame is, "Next 10 Planned Videos"
Firstly, thank you for the story about the history of the Russian empire. But when you calculate the military score, it would be correct to add the coefficient of the number of wars. Because otherwise it turns out a situation in which the country that won in one single war will have the maximum war score.
Well, technically, I'm not agree with total 100% loss of Russian Republic: indeed, in pure de-jure matter it was indeed so, for Republic was proclaimed in 1st of September of 1917 (by Julian calendar, by Gregorian it's the 14th), yet if we count entire period of Russia between February and October Revolutions (or even up to forceful disbandment of Constituent Assembly in 6/19 of January, 1918), there could be technically two things which one could count as a victories for the Provisional Goverment regime: the July insurrection of radical left-wing forces such as Bolsheviks and Left Social-Revolutionaries ended in their loss and the Kornilov affair, which is kinda dubious thing at all, yet if one percieve it as a genuine attempt of coup by Kornilov (and not as an intrigue by Kerenskiy to consolidate power) it was still thwarted by government. Therefore, there are 66.67% of victories, even if these victories are dubious at best and does not matter at all in any means.
Well, it probably just means that France participated in most of the wars of that period ))) Actually there’s a more serious explanation. France generally had its own political interests in Poland and Ottoman Empire, which clashed with Russian influence on these regions. However after the famous Franco-Prussian war it became obvious that the Germans are OP, so other great nations assembled an unnatural alliance of Russia, Britain and France to counter them 😅
If you think about it, Prussia was able to unify Germany only because it was spared by Peter lll in 7 years war (for no good reason for Russia. Peter was such a simp he wrote letters to Frederick asking for prussian military medals). Later prussian unified Germany in WW1 caused so much damage and then sent Lenin from Switzerland, which destroyed Russian Empire. So a prussiaboo is responsible for the fall of empire.
Meh even if Russia had continued the war, I doubt prussia would have been completely dissolved as a state. Carthaginian peaces weren't really popular in Europe at that time. Most likely they would have had to cede some border territories to their neighbours.
@mappingshaman5280 I believe Prussia would have lost its Eastern territories, while being a vassal/independent in their western side, acting like a buffer state between France and Russian ambitions
First confirmed Wehraboo in history.
It wasn't for no reason - maybe no good reason - but Peter grew up heavily antagonistic towards his mother, and as a result veered to interests which were basically the opposite of her own; shows the importance of actually being a good parent to your kids.
@subashira8796 hereditary monarchy is a bad basis for a system of government. No healthy state should veer of course because of one manchild.
I love Russian history I'm so glad you continued this series
Poland next 😎
@@TheRezro
Until russia becomes muslim 🥱
@@SaadBinAlamgir3345 Soon™
Same
@@SaadBinAlamgir3345what are you talking about?
the really interesting case about this section of russian military history, is while they had a great many victories, most losses they do have are devastating and greatly impactful, which I find fascinating
Russian Empire: Takes Crimea and Zaporozhie ( central Novorossia ) in XVIII century.
Ukraine: Don't even exist until 1918.
For the algorithm
Edit: thanks for the likes I actually comment under most possible history videos this comment in order to push in the algorithm
For the algorithm
For the algorithm
For the algorithm
For the algorithm
For GONDOR
Respect to Russia from Poland
Respect to Shitler from Poland
Respect to Poland from Russia
Interesting
@@widodoakrom3938Indeed
top 10 anime plot twists
13:20 Something similar happened with the Belgian expeditionary corps during ww1. Belgian soldiers were sent to fight alongside Russia in 1915 with armored cars. When the Russian Revolution happened they had to go back home going east, crossing all of Russia, China, the Pacific, the USA, the Atlantic and then back to Belgium. See this : en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgian_Expeditionary_Corps_in_Russia. It certainly would make a great movie.
Same thing happened with a Czech unit fighting for russia
@@goldenfiberwheat238 If I remember correctly the Bolsheviks didn't want to let them go home, so they did hit them heavily
I would like to recommend a concept for a new series you could do. The idea is that you take the place of a historical leader, and you choose what decisions to make as that historical leader based on what would be the most beneficial for the nation the historical leader you chose ruled over. The way you would go about doing this is you would base your decisions off of the knowledge you had at your disposal at the time. For example, you could do a video where you take the place of Louis XIV and you choose how you would expand the size, influence and power of France in the 17th and 18th centuries. Or you could take the place of Louis XV and decide how you could preserve the French empire in America and India. Perhaps you could even take the place of Louis XVI and decide how you could prevent the french revolution if you were in his position. A criticism you could levy at this idea is that it’s too similar to the series you’re already doing on “What if everything went perfectly for X”, but I disagree. Firstly, this series is about making decisions as a single person, not for an entire nation over the course of hundreds of years. Secondly, with your “What if everything went perfectly for X” series, you utilize the benefit of hindsight. With this series, you limit yourself to the knowledge of your chosen leader. You Don’t HAVE to do it this way, you could utilize the benefit of hindsight for this series too, but limiting yourself this way would help differentiate this series from your “What if everything went perfectly for X” series. You might as well try this idea on for a video and see how it performs. If it performs badly, you don’t have to continue it. But if it performs well, you could have another successful series on your hands. It is low risk, high reward. With how many historical leaders there are, the possibilities for this series are limitless! Some ideas for historical leaders to make videos on are Seleucus, Justinian, Louis the Pious, John I, Charles V, Phillip II of Spain, Charles XII, Peter III, Napoleon, Charles X, Napoleon III, Kaiser Wilhelm II, and so many more!
Russia actually wasnt preforming poorly in ww1 yes the great retreat was a bad situation but after that Russia did a faital blow to Osmans in battle of Erzican and Trabzond and Austria Hungary in Brusilov offensive if it hadn't been for February revolution Russia would have gotten to Warsaw as well 1917 Russia was holding the front very well battle of Marasesti as example and even gained some land battle of Zborov even the battle that Russia lost operation Albion Germany lost a lot of ships to capture an island it was internal problem that Russia had
Brusilove offensive ran out of steam and Russia was crushed when they tried an offensive in East Prussia. That was the end -Germans trashed Russian forces and the front line collapsed. Yes, Bolsheviks then made peace but, even without them, Russian position was unattainable. They lost that war.
@@mrvk39 Russian defeat in Tannberg happened before 1916 but Russia wasn't crushed by it despite hard battles of 1915 Russia choose to retreat thus saving its army from being surrounded and was able to stabilize the front by the end of the year Brusilov offensive could have been more successful if Evert chose to start his offensive in the north but despite that it was enough to destroy Austrian army Russia also had a quite successful Mitav operation at the beginning of 1917 if February revolution was unsuccessful the war would have ended by end of 1917 however despite what have happened it was a political defeat not militarily.
@@jackhardy3905 first on Brusilov front - he ran out of ammunition and out of enough troops trained by him to execute his maneuvers. He lost 500,000 in that offensive and he needed training that new recruits lacked (and most importantly junior officers that his strategy relied on to make crucial battle-time decisions). And Kerensky offensive in early 1917 was a disaster rivaling Tannenberg. ALL gains on that front and more were lost before the October Revolution. Russia lacked ammunition to continue fighting against Germany and it was German decision to shift focus away from that front because it was no longer a threat. So, both fronts were in shambles before the October Revolution. It was a military defeat as well.
@@mrvk39 Funny how they have enough amunation for civill war Karensky offensive failed because of lack of discipline not because of ammunition or weapon shortage
Kill 1 million and loss a million too
Love this war series man! Keep it up!
Suggestion: What if miguel da paz survived.
Yeah, our Imperial military success in definitely something to be proud of.
And, if you examine these wars more closely, it was not only about quality of Russian forces at all, as some people think.
At the beginning of the 19th century, for example, Russian military prestige was so high that the events of 1805-1807 were very shocking not just for the Russians but for their allies as well as Russia loosing a major war was something extraordinarily.
Russian army back then was considered to be the best in Europe alongside Prussian.
Can you do poland ? I think it’s a good idea
I support that
part 1 😄
part2 💀
Lol so true
@@chinesetaxevader Poland, phoenix of nations.
@@TheRezro *hyena of Europe
I love when PH uploads 😁
Ayo? 🤨
@@kidfromtownwithnoname3595 what?
@@stargazer-elitecorn hub
@@stargazer-elite i thought you were referencing p*rnhub since they have the same acronym
MABUHAY ANG PILIPINAS!
Hey I have an idea (which is definitely not an original idea by any means), but what would be your take of a world map by 2100? You're my favorite mapping channel and I would love to see your take on it!
Love this series
What always bugs me out is when Countries that have impressive geographical advantages and ease of access cheap traderoutes like France and UK are all teaming up on practically Locked out Russia that has to rely on freezing ports in the North or to our neighbours mercy to allow our ships through Bosporus and Dardanelles in Turkey and next in other choke points in the Mediterranean like Gibraltar and Suez to access global trade routes or on Baltic Sea routes with Danes controlling the choke points to exit it. Just because their massive empires (That occupied a half of the globe) were "afraid" of Russian influenced Balkans.
And it's still continues to this day with every single country in NATO pissing their pants because of Russia. Thought it doesn't justify any war waged. By any country.
Simple. "Balanced world is when my nation is on top" - Literally every major power.
@@pelinalwhitestrake3367 Exactly. I wouldn't say Russia is clear of that mentality either, especially this decade
I love history and I love your channel man
Glad to see you making a lot of videos constantly
I always watch at least one video of yours everyday the vids are very interesting :)
“…being replaced by Marshal Bernadotte.”
Charles XIII: “Am I a joke to you?”
I quess that this type of videos, but about France, would be a long journey
PH UPLOADED LET'S GOOO
Love your videos so much (:
You always make me smile.
Can you one for Byzantium after Russia?
Byzanthine was folding for most of they history.
I would love to see a video about the possibility of a Celtic spain, something about a world where there’s an actual Celtic “major” nation seems interesting to me
Celtic England would make the most sense.
Hyped for the next Russia video
9:24 december revoult wasn't about Constantine. It was about more liberty in Russia
One part of the Decembrists wanted to put Constantine on the throne, the other part to declare a republic
kinda was, kinda not. The decabrists pushed the agebda of Constantie taking the throne for him to become puppet emperor and with it force the constitutional monarchy for government form. All their others ideas - mostly just copypaste of regime of Napoleonic France, with primal goal of not liberties, but the benefit of national conscioness and industrialization. Also, they wanted to give Russia some more military capability and depth with changing the capital from Saint-Petersburg to Nizhniy Novgorod
decabrists, in a whole were kinda based with background of scumbag rulers as Alexander 1 and Catherine th Great, who both repressed the peasentry leading to long-lasting problems with modernisation and nation consolidation in 19th century
The ones who wanted constantine on the throne still wanted more of constitutional monarchy rather then absolute monarchy, but yeah
I love this series, great job on it! Russian Empire W
11:45
The biggest mistake of the Russian Empire. Support a potential competitor, instead of destroying it, and gain a good ally in Hungary by holding out the rebels (But this is not a fact, but it would not be as strong as Austria-Hungary). Russia would have been able to capture Galicia and lodomerIa without any problems, and make All the Balkans its sphere of influence. This huge mistake destroyed Russia's status as a full-fledged great power in the future.
Speculation: Most likely, Austria at the time of its collapse, perhaps when the Italians captured the Adriatic coast, and a war of independence would have begun in Bohemia, would have become a protectorate of Prussia, and in the future, would have become part of a single mega Germany. If everything had gone according to the scenario of the First World War, with Franco-Mega Germany, then most likely it would have been like this:
🇫🇷 France
🇷🇺 Russia
(Most likely 🇭🇺 Hungary)
(Great Britain 🇬🇧, if Mega Germany destroys France and Russia)
VS
🇩🇪 Mega Germany
(🇬🇧 British, if France and Russia destroys Mega Germany)
🇮🇹 Italy
(Maybe 🇹🇷 Osman Empire)
I love this series
my friend : marvel x dc is the best crossover ever!
Me : 14:16
Love this series so far
Here's an idea I've got for a future video, what if Britain France and Israel won a decisive victory in the Suez crisis? How would this change the dynamics of the cold war?
Amuses me how my own homeland is able to consistently defeat its' enemies and stay afloat
i like this series
The Kingdom of Poland was in a personal union with Russia at first, so it should technically have its own borders on the map.
Prussia:
Hey guys! Instead of hating each other...why don't we split Poland-Lithuania among us?
Russian Empire and Austrian Empire:
Sounds like a Plan...We like it!
Poland-Lithuania:
I'm so screwed...
Tsardom of Russia be grinding thoes stats on the Poles. It's honestly preety sad seeing that Poles had preety good relations with tsar Alexander, with chances of reutring some more land back to congress Poland and the whole autonomy of congress Poland just for all of this to be swept aside by Nickolas the first.
Yeah, Alex was interesting. Not perfect, but good by partition standards.
It’s sad that polish aristocracy couldn’t take the L and just stop revolting lmao
Continue this!
Could you do “What if Qing China
was successful?” aka if Qing China was able to adapt and modernize during the Victorian Era
It’s probably not possible. The Qing were suspicious of any Han revolt and refused to arm them in any way, while deep rooted bureaucracy stopped any attempts at reform.
@@Moonl55but what if… they did it anyways?
Please make one for france
I want a what if Empress Elizabeth didn't die, it's a big turning point in the seven years
Don't mind me just commenting to help this video in the algorithm
Actually napoleon was average height for the time.
Salute this kid
Боже царя храни!
Последнего не схоронил
❤
Путина?
Would love to see you do Rome some day! 753bc to 1453ad has a LOT of battles!
That would be sick
Would take a lot of time to make but would be worth the long wait
Splendid video, have an algorithm boost
What would be the score without counting the rebellions?
Great video
This will be amazing
why did he stop this series, these videos are so good
11:23 what song is this?
very nice video just want to point out one small mistake albania was not in the entente in ww1 but other than that amazing
Those poles escaping that way still is an amazing move plot
Soviet Union video should be interesting
great work as usual.
I got a question for ya what do you think would have happened if the assassination attempt duing the big three meeting was successful. how would the death of all three leaders of the major allied nations affect the war effort?
Can you please do all wars: Vietnam
I think vietnam is an interesting country, its has fend off all invader and never give up the spirit of independence to this day. Reckon it would be a cool video if you ever make one
Nice
you should do a vid about if yuan ShiKai didnt become president after helping the chinese republic overthrow Cixi (becasue he later crowned himself emperor and then that lead to the whole warlord era so it would be cool to see if china would have stayed unified)
Can you give the name of first track?
I really like classical music and looking for this banger for a while.
I hope you can do prussia soon
16:02 This part about Iran's constitutional revolution us totally false. Russia didn't end the revolution. The constitutionalists won the Civil War and the king was exiled. He returned later but was defeated again. The Russians presence in northern Iran was the result of a secret treaty in 1907 with the British.
Great jazz in the background.
Do it for Turkey next
I don’t get the scoring system
80% victories (100% Victories = 3 points)
10% losses (100% losses = 0 points)
10% draws (100% draws = 1 point)
80% of 3 = 2.4
No points for losses
10% of 1 = 0.1
Total score: 2.5
@@Totallynotadutchperson thank you
pls do Philippines 🙏🙏 thank you
Video idea: what if everything went PERFECT for modern Greece
Do an Armenia video when you’re done with the Russia series
Video Idea: What if the Ottoman Empire never recovered from the Battle of Ankara in 1402
4:15 English grammar tip:
Plurals in English never use apostrophes.
Apostrophes are only used in two circumstances:
a) contractions - two words being mashed into one; and
b) making possessive adjectives from nouns and proper nouns - but not pronouns
The proper way to write the title of this frame is, "Next 10 Planned Videos"
Firstly, thank you for the story about the history of the Russian empire. But when you calculate the military score, it would be correct to add the coefficient of the number of wars. Because otherwise it turns out a situation in which the country that won in one single war will have the maximum war score.
And also a war scale. Winning over the Nazi Germany and winning over an Indian tribe are a bit different.
Could you in the future do the same with Chile? 🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱
Well, technically, I'm not agree with total 100% loss of Russian Republic: indeed, in pure de-jure matter it was indeed so, for Republic was proclaimed in 1st of September of 1917 (by Julian calendar, by Gregorian it's the 14th), yet if we count entire period of Russia between February and October Revolutions (or even up to forceful disbandment of Constituent Assembly in 6/19 of January, 1918), there could be technically two things which one could count as a victories for the Provisional Goverment regime: the July insurrection of radical left-wing forces such as Bolsheviks and Left Social-Revolutionaries ended in their loss and the Kornilov affair, which is kinda dubious thing at all, yet if one percieve it as a genuine attempt of coup by Kornilov (and not as an intrigue by Kerenskiy to consolidate power) it was still thwarted by government. Therefore, there are 66.67% of victories, even if these victories are dubious at best and does not matter at all in any means.
music is too loud from 4:30 onwards
Russia Strong💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
Historically? Mostly yes.
Currently? Not really.
In grinding kills on revolutions
very succesful until the japan-russia war
*cough-cough-tzar's arse whooping in crimean war-cough*
@@ЕгорПещерскийto be fair, they were fighting 3 great powers alone
@@clintonbreeden6970
Just one great power, UK. With Ottomans and France.
@@ЕгорПещерский Ottoman Empire and France were considered great powers, not superpowers though.
@@clintonbreeden6970
France and Ottomans, lmao
first view & comment
cool!
Hello there!
nice!
can we do some alt hist on saturday?
Why did you delete your gaming channel
Can you do Afghanistan next
nice
all those small rebellions really boosted their score lmao, still impressive
America’s score was seriously boosted by all the Indian wars.
Video idea: What if history went perfect for Turkey? (not ottomans)
For the algorithm (fr fr)
funny how in most war, russia is either on the side of france or against france
Well, it probably just means that France participated in most of the wars of that period )))
Actually there’s a more serious explanation. France generally had its own political interests in Poland and Ottoman Empire, which clashed with Russian influence on these regions. However after the famous Franco-Prussian war it became obvious that the Germans are OP, so other great nations assembled an unnatural alliance of Russia, Britain and France to counter them 😅
If all went perfect for P H
Russian republic also dealt with Kornilov's coup. Not a war tho, but if you count revolutions - why not coup attempts?
Possible gaming is close ?
What happened to the gaming channel?
can you do if wilhelm nicholas and george stuck together in ww1
Youst wached it what is next after rusia
Background music name? 11:31
What happened to possible gaming? It shows its deleted.
What's the song on the Russo-Japanese War?
Russian Empire had other flag, it was White-Blue-Red
Day 6 of asking for what if everything went perfect for Romania
For the algorithm suiiiiiiiiiiiii
Slava Algorhitm