Woman Flashes Charlie Kirk to Get Him Banned? (& Vivek debates her)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
- #vivek #debate
Well this would be a new debate technique. Warren Smith analysis this debate between a college student, Vivek Ramaswamy & Charlie Kirk.
Watch exclusive content here: / secret_scholars
Royalty Free Music: Bensound.com
License code: YD1UHA2CU9NY3DWL
I don't know, but as a woman, I can't imagine "accidentally" exposing myself like that, especially knowing I'm on camera surrounded by people.
She seems to have this self soothing thing where she's calming herself by touch. But it looks bizarre indeed. Almost too bizarre for it to be intentional, she's doing it all the way through.
@@zaq9339
I know what you’re saying. That’s a possibility. My only issue is that when she exposed herself, she grabbed her top and pulled it down. It looked very deliberate.
I think the self touchy feely thing was just her working up the nerve and trying to figure out how to not be obvious. When Vivek attempted to send her on her way, she realized she’d have to act quickly, then responded and brought out the nip.
@@flapjackson6077 I know what you're saying too and I think I disagree. Not sure deliberate is the right word. As someone who pulls their hair unknowingly for no reason I must say not all things that look deliberate are this way. Either she's self soothing and it's a nonvoluntary nervous tick of pulling on things or she's totally bat shit crazy wicked to have devised this plan that any remotely rational person would assume would backfire on them. All this in a questionable attempt to have a debate opponent demonetized for the price of the entire campus seeing her boob for no reason (huge reputational risk).
She's unprepared and nervous and somewhat incoherent as a result but not outwardly psychotic. No reason to assume foul play over other more likely and rational explanations.
@@flapjackson6077 Her facial expression changes. She's had years of being in tank tops, bikinis etc to know when her breasts are exposed or not. It would be like a guy accidently popping out a nut after adjusting his speedos and not knowing, but that would never happen because we're dealing with very sensitive parts of the body where things like hems on clothing can be felt easily.
@@zaq9339 She went from cradling herself to deliberately grabbing at her chest, which I assume was her bra, and pulling it down, continuing to hold it down. She showed no concern about potentially exposing her breast, indicating that her action was intentional rather than accidental.
She gripped her shirt and pulled. That was completely intentional
Agreed. No way it was by accident. Add to that her general demeanor and attitude and that leaves very little room for doubt. Add to that the ideology that informs her and its attitude towards "morality" and "necessary means" and it's pretty much a guarantee.
@@etsequentia6765 and the fact that abortion was the first topic she brought up
Her parents must be soooooo proud..
Her mom probably showed her how
i always see people make that basic comment, people like this do not care what their parents think though. they already believe their parents are aligned with the enemy.
Silly comment. Doesn't matter how different kids are for their parents. They will always love them in some way. Irrespective if they've rebelled
It goes to show how low people of this kind will operate. Since the life of the unborn isn't sacred, she'll visually obfuscate by distorting what should be sacred.
@@pancakes4140 Silly comment. Just because your kid has behaved stupidly doesn't mean they shouldn't have a reason to not love them.
Sorry, she's completely clueless and entirely out of her league. She came there to start trouble and pick a fight, she ended up getting intellectually humiliated.
I think this is spot on and she knew it. So she did what MANY women do and try to shift control using body language. Which she hasn't completely mastered yet but usually works on the college boys she's used to hanging with. So she gave it a shot anyway.
yet she claims the others are antagonizing the students.
it reminds me of a grown adult who started talking about something she just got her foot in, and then when confronted with facts, proceeded to shut down the talk by stating she didn't have energy to argue, while continue to dish out her point of view. it wasnt arguing that she's against, she just couldnt bare losing and not being the one having the last word.
every time i stated pure facts devoid of my own preference and opinion, she would immediately get defensive and criticise how toxic and argumentative the community we are in, while being oblivious of the fact that she's apart of the community also and how quickly defensive and presumptious she is.
no one can be intellectually humiliated by Charlie Kirk. No one. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@jimbusmaximus4624 Many men use the same body language tactic, it just displays more aggressively due to psychological and biological differences. It's a human response that's flavored differently based on sex, like a taunt in a video game being adapted by the skin a character wears.
@@dawsonsfilmchannel I've seen it multiple times. you need Cognitive Dissidence to think its never happened
Vivek is the most reasonable and fair debater I have ever seen. He is calm, polite, and always shows that he understands the other sides position and then explains why he thinks that’s harmful. This man can do so much for our country.
preach, really wish he had a better chance at running for presidency, maybe in the future
He’ll make a great president one day
if he's not president by 2035, this country sucks
I friggin’ love Vivek 😎
Hre's another traitor to his country
Girl: "Because of the way you edit your content..."
Charlie: "We post unedited content."
Girl: ...flop....
Charlie: "Well, obviously we'll edit *that* out..."
Debating kids who have barely any knowledge on how life works - ⛔️
Giving loans to kids who have no idea how they're going to pay it back - ✅️
These are the kids who will run America. At the end of the day, 100 000k University and can't even talk without getting nervous? what are they paying for?
While denying those same people Business loans, due to lack of collateral.
Talking to kids who are not getting the education they need to survive outside of college. Trying to open there minds to other opinions.
@@guyfanno1 are they really kids?
@@remicasallena : Unfortunately, in terms of maturity, yes they are. Not very long ago they'd be married, with children by that age, and would be reasonably mature adults, and growing in maturity by leaps and bounds. I say raise the voting age to the greater of 25, or 24 months out of full-time school.
This whole how dare you debate college students and make them look dumb. First no one is forcing them to debate. Second aren’t college students supposed to be bright? The fact that we have to shield them really says something about are culture.
Also college students are adults who vote! They’re not little kids they should be able to defend their beliefs just like any other adult.
@@sweetxjc Not to mention aren’t the left constantly trying to lower the voting age?
Also the students can prepare to debate Charlie by checking out his videos. They have a huge advantage on him.
@@BlckJack123 But that would require them to study. And it would be crazy to expect college students to do that.
College has gone from a place to be challenged by differing ideas to a safe space where words are violence. This country is fkd
It's really funny to see how Vivek gives her an exit multiple times because he sees that she has nothing of substance to say and he doesn't want her to embarrass herself any further yet she keeps pushing and pushing.
She's trying to jump-start her Only Fans career.
Working for me, what’s her @
I think you are right about her.
For real, she's seeing that hawk tuah money in her brain
The future she chose after college was prostitution.
She is a woman, so it’s possible she is taking advantage of airtime to promote those two puppies.
Woman here. There is no way I would ever 'accidentaly' move in a way that would 'accidentally' expose myself. When I wear more revealing clothing I am constatly making sure I don’t expose myself. She grabbed her shirt, moved her shirt down, and popped her breast out. There was nothing natural about her movement. I can't think of a single women who would ever do that unless they want their breast to show. There is nothing elaborate either. That is the oldest trick in the book. It the same thing some women do when losing an aurgument. They fake cry. It takes one braincell to do. I hate that behavior. This is the same. I don't know if she wanted to get them banned on yt. I do know she did it to throw them off.
And failed marvelously lol.
Agree as I saw it she dropped her shoulder to allow space under her arm, moved her hand to pinch the fabric and then pulled the fabric down whilst pulling her should back. She then locked her left arm down keeping the fabric in place exposing her breast and nipple.
It was deliberate no one pulls down the shirt they pull it out away from the skin or up.
I agree, knowing multiple women they all agree there's a 0 percent chance they wouldn't know, it's not like peitos are completely numb. Come on men you know that 😂
I had it happened bc of a bag or backpack, never by accidently pulling a top with my hand 😅
Yes but if a guy says she did it on purpose to flash me later on the girl will gaslight like mad and say its your fault you saw it and you're a creep
That was not an accident.
Can you prove that beyond a reasonable doubt? Enough that it's worth risking humiliating a girl just because she has different political views than you?
@@josh8491 : All doubt, no. Reasonable doubt? Yes. She clearly grabs her top, pulls it down beneath her nipple, and holds it there for an extended time. Either that or she has a subconscious response to expose herself whenever she feels cornered.
@@josh8491 Kinda hard to understand you with those balls on your chin. You a lawyer..."beyond a reasonable doubt".....If your momma raised you right....
@@josh8491 look at her face at the same time she does that. Come on man
@@josh8491 lmao, source??? proof??? where is your peer-reviewed study that proves she flashed him on purpose 😎😎
as a woman, i can say that when wearing a top like that most of us are aware of the possible slip so we tend to subconsciously pull up if we have a huge décolleté...or pull down if the problematic part is the underboob... so this weird pull down looks pretty intentional. especially the way it was held down. But what do i know...
My thoughts precisely. She pulls up her pants before at least twice, so she has some sort it sensory input and a logical response, but when it comes to the shirt she does not feel the scratch of fabric over skin? the change of temperature? As you said the response under such circumstances is almost unconscious since it is a habit to arrange your clothing as such, and the pull is usually up not down, again take the way she reacts to her pants riding low.
@@LH_ore i think she realized she made a fool out of herself and did this thinking it would be edited out... not nessesserly that she had an idea to get Charlie Kirk canceled
@@LemonHelmmet Yeah if I had to deal with that I would've just pulled further down closer to the bottom, and also with much less intensity.
Not intentional? Really? She literally pulled her shirt down! What kind of woman would actually do that unintentionally? As a woman, I’m always very aware when wearing something low-cut and would put my hand on my chest, if I’m in a position where I could potentially flash people, to make sure that doesn’t happen. We do not pull our shirt down like that for no reason. It’s almost sexist to think women don’t do this intentionally.
Exaclty my thought!
Hi Warren she totally planned the move, in the earlier frames she touched the top seam of her blouse then her breast, she was setting it up. She was trying not to smile after she did that, so sad. Props to Charlie n Vivak for not reacting
Looks intentional to me. I kind of doubt there was a larger plan, though. I think she was just trying to throw him off.
It's obvious. She had a goofy look on her face afterward and didn't hear his question. Meaning she was focused on the stunt and expecting a reaction to that.
I agree. What my experience with girls like this, (attractive, makeup, nice haircut, and well fitted clothes,) has taught me, is they're acutely aware of body language and how much of themselves they are displaying. Because they use it. Even if they didn't seek out to learn this behavior intentionally, it's just what happens sociologically. She knew EXACTLY how much of her was showing.
Someone probably dared her.
She's clearly used to using her body to get her way. For the streets.
@@jimbusmaximus4624 Men think about sex, women think about their bodies, roughly the same amount of psychological drive in regards to those two subjects. With that being said she is more than likely aware.
She knows what he does and who he is it’s obvious and she’s just trying to play dumb but that always comes with the possible backfire on the individual
Before she flashed she starts to become nervous.
I don’t think she’s playing dumb. She’s just dumb
I don't think it was to get him banned, however, trying to get him to have a perv in a "gotcha" moment would have been far worse. Imagine if Charlie and Vivek had both stared, which I'm sure she's used to, especially surrounded by young teenage men, the scandal would have been huge.
Good point, he's a political candidate and while it would be absurd to complain he looked at some campus co-ed, the media industry would make him out to be some friend of the Clintons.
The check-mate for any argument…TIDDIES!
Works on me, amirite brothers??
@@daze4135 I don't mind. 😂
I think the "who are you" was supposed to be more of a "who do you think you are".
So arrogant! She was even disrespectful to Vivek.
Okay, that's a fair interpretation, and I'm inclined to agree. But why then go through the whole charade of pretending like you thought you'd stumbled upon some kind of popup improve comedy open mic thing? And then proceed to wait in line while you can clearly hear Charlie debating those before you, all the while seething with utter contempt for someone you apparently have no clue the identity of.
@acarroll6842 , she also said she knew he spoke to college kids, "making them look stupid", so she knew exactly who he was. All the other nonsense she said was just a lame ass front to try to make herself look less stupid, but it didn't work.
She couldn’t even articulate that
100% intentional. She pinched, intentionally grabbing fabric, then pulled down.
It looks deliberate to me. She pulls her pants up and her top down?
When I saw her adjust her pants earlier, I thought it was incidental with her being nervous and trying to cover herself up. At that point, I thought maybe the shirt was going to be incidental too - until I saw that part. The timing was really suspect, and I think she did purposefully pulled her shirt down (perhaps subconsciously) to distract from the fact that she was being humiliated in that debate.
@@SSPspaz I don't think she was humiliated, it was a brave thing to do facing two men like that. Even drunk women know where there boobs are.
This girl is just AWFUL! So weak! She did it on purpose. Her parents must be so embarrassed.
She 100% did it on purpose. She pinched the fabric and pulled it down
That was her emergency ejection handle. It wasn't going her way and she probably thought by doing it she would make it so they wouldn't be able to post the video of her.
WATCH her face as she does it, the eye dart to her left then the small smile as someone shouts yayhayhay.... Entirely intentional. Likely planned and other knew it was coming.
Her asking "Who are you?" was not because she does not know him, it came across like a condescending, "who are you to ask me such a thing, you are nothing to me"
Of course it was intentional. She's lost her debate and had nothing else left
If a guy exposed himself, he'd be arrested. Why are we giving her a free pass?
Warren has speech level 100 on skyrim. There's no debate on that.
It was 100% intentional. That isn't a normal way to touch your shirt or boob.
Look st her body language and micro expressions.. she knew what she was doing.. amd it was preknowledge she accessed to do it.
Meaning it is common knowledge in her friend circles to do this on camera when loosing an argument.
She wasn't nervous.. she was embarrased as she was flashing a crowd on purpose.
Obvious.
I look at her body language and all I see someone who's nervous from speaking in front of so many people. She was constantly readjusting her clothes the whole time for no reasons, nervous people often do that. You can hear it in her voice too.
8:15 "She doesn't look like someone that would be able to coordinate an elaborate plan."
Agreed, but a plan isn't needed for this. She definitely looks like someone that would embrace reputation destruction on the drop of a hat. Especially if the floor is pulled out from under her. Even more so if she's confronting someone she thinks is an enemy.
Good take.
I don't think she intended to get Kirk's channel banned on TH-cam. She would know that he can edit the video before posting. I think this was an intentional attempt to distract him from making a logical argument. Totally would have worked against me. Glad Charlie had better focus! Or it was an act of disrespect. In any case, her action was invalid in rational discourse.
Agreed. I think the headline on Charlie Kirk’s video was hyperbolic, likely to generate buzz and to get clicks. You’ve got a very attractive girl in the thumbnail plus a title that mentions how she flashed you - and boom you’ve got a viral video. I hate that is the world we live in now, but that’s how the game is played and I won’t judge Charlie’s content team for it.
That being said, she certainly wasn’t trying to get him cancelled. The nip slip WAS on purpose though. She was trying to use every tool in her arsenal to distract from the fact that she was getting owned in the debate. Maybe she was hoping that one of them would comment on her nips instead of ignoring them so she could accuse them of being objectifying her or being perverts.
That's because you're not a nagggot, unlike Kirk.
For the intentions, I don't know. But that was clearly deliberate.
Seriously tho, the subtlety of her manipulation was as much ‘honest anxiety/fear’ as walking into a gentleman’s club in a suit made of $100 bills. You can literally see the hamster in her brain working OT on that treadmill. And I’d go a step further to say that *THIS* was the reason for her jittery, wobbly, stilted voice; not out of intimidation, but rather being caught.
Watch her eyes at the moment leading up to the exposure, and then directly afterwards when suddenly, she has this epiphany that she’s not being called out or it being addressed in any manner- she thinks she’s gotten away with her deviousness and she’s quite pleased with herself. I’d even go further by saying the top she wore only exacerbates my point and was chosen with intentionally despicable behavior.
100% that was intentional. Gross.
definitely on purpose. probably not to get him banned. maybe to distract him and mess with him, trip him up.
She's a pampered kid who's just not used to having her views challenged . Probably .
Ban attempt by her? Maybe. Accidental behavior? Nope. Subtle on her part? Nope.
Dunno about assigning a specific motivation to her flashing (getting Kirk banned on YT), yet I do not see her action as subtle.
[edit]
Her arms were folded in front of her when this happened. In that position, she pulled down the L side of her top with her R hand. Not subtle, IMO. She took the cloth of her top in between her thumb and finger. Those are all voluntary muscles, voluntary actions. She pulled the top down, just below her nipple. She had to sense that on her own body.
Her motivation? Yeah, could be to get that video banned or demonitized or something like that. Could be. I can't prove it. I think that assumption fits best, just can't prove it.
You can even see it in her face when she intentionally pinches the blouse. Oh well, didn't work and probably screwed her future a little bit. I know I wouldn't want to employ her after seeing that. Absolute HR nightmare once she doesn't get her way. I pity the guy that gets on her bad side after being somewhere alone with her.
She didn't hurt her future. Regardless of what's coming out of her mouth, she's hot. A lot of people (unwisely) are willing to put up with her mind in exchange with being close to her body.
It's not intentional, no, in that I don't think she went there planning to do that, but it was 100% intentional in that was a specific action intended to achieve something. I would say the hand movement is WAY too specific to be anything else, and the aggressive duck face following it is a challenge. When neither of them pick up on it she wobbles back into babbling incoherence, but that girl was dumb enough to flash Kirky and Vivek.
I can't actually imagine being dumb enough to think no one could simply blur that out, but, hey, I went to university when they still taught things.
You are confusing premeditated with intentional. It was probably not premeditated, but it almost certainly was intentional. Words matter.
@@l-cornelius-dol Only to pendants.
@@Belzediel : I suspect they matter to people who wish to communicate accurately, not only to "a hanging ornament". Good self-own, though.
She might have thought he was live streaming
It was most definitely intentional
Clout chasers everywhere, especially among students. Half of them want to be 'influencers' and they know Kirk has a following. She was probably going for a viral moment. Hawk Tuah 2.0 maybe. She shot her shot. I bet her Insta is blowing up
If by "blowing up" you mean all her girlfriends then sure.😂🤣
Also, she kept grabbing at herself in the beginning. I think she was planning on doing it the whole time , she was just waiting for the perfect opportunity to do it in a way that was “subtle” . I believe this to be true because she was NEVER specific about anything, and she looked like her mind was elsewhere during the moments she was grabbing at herself. Then when she did pull her top down-- she sort of looked stunned that nobody said anything. Then she couldn’t come up with anything to say after, because in her mind she did what she wanted. She wasn’t really plugged into the conversation/ debate the whole time
She probably has a crush on him too. Can you imagine her doing this to a much older fat guy?
Where can we find the uncensored version?
For research purposes...
Yes for science. Count me in
Why should her flashing him get anyone in trouble but herself ? If he flashed her he would in jail
In the end she invokes her pretty privilege cause that's all she's got. It was a defense mechanism.
I think that privilege card has way too many punch marks already.
😅 I was thinking that she needs to cover her baby boob back up. I think we throw around “pretty privilege” a little too much.
@@WinstonSmithGPT Being now 62 ( going on 30)I've watched the change as those who live on their "PP" age and looks fade. It often leaves them bitter and mean as their P-power disappears....I know its wrong , but I just have to smile.
One day that poor woman won't be pretty anymore.
Woman? She still thinks she's a kid Talking to a 30 year old
She did it to test if Charlie edits his content, simple.
Looks super intentional, she lost the debate so she had to resort to that is seems.
“It doesn’t make sense,” well if you listened to her nothing she said made sense.
Wokies don't make sense.
It was intentional, you can clearly see where she is prepping for the tugging of the top, she tugs it and the expression on her face changes. She knew. She was not getting the attention she was looking for-that’s why she did it. Why was her demeanour different with Charlie? Because she doesn’t have a crush on Vivek. Girls get rude and sassy with men, when they’re immature, to signal they are attracted to them. Oh yes they do.
She isn't in college to be prepared she's there for fun
I don't think she knows where the heck she is . She still thinks of herself as a kid
Is anyone else bothered by her gestures, motions, and facial expressions. I know other young people that talk and move just like this. There is something uncanny about it.
It was intentional but I seriously doubt she was thinking about getting his show banned. She likely understands it's not live otherwise she wouldn't be making the edit videos comment. So I think she was trying to get him to look and react in some way so that she could claim he's a pervert or something.
She spent the entire time pulling at her clothes, she was gathering her courage. She knew what she was doing.
Yes she was handling her boob the entire time. It seemed like it. She might even secretly be attracted to kirk being calm/dominant and shes one of those kind of freaky girls if you know what im talking about.
"how can you debate college kids", so you've seen his videos?
"You're 30 right?", so you've googled him?
"I have no idea who you are, who are you", so you're an amnesiac?
"I thought this was a improve comedy thing", so you're just clueless?
"I think that you push a dangerous agenda", so you DO know who he is!
All in the span of a minute. How could you ever talk to a person who just lies so easily and can't even keep her lies straight?
Her body language shows she planned it at about 4 minutes in this video, nearly did it, then waited til it was less obvious.
We need to see that clip unedited. For substance. And science.
I watched this debate when it happened. She totally planned this! She was losing the debate, and she needed to cause a distraction. Charlie Kirk debating college students is the perfect time to be debating them - while their minds are developing, and they are forming their opinions on life.
She thought it was a live stream according to their discussion. It was intentional
I can not know her motives, the youtube cancellation theory seems pretty far fetched, but this was 100% intentional.
Yo that was pretty blatant.
She was practicing for her OF career
She thinks flashing or exposing will distract men from delivering unpleasant fax to her
I'm confused, did medicine cure all STD's in the last couple of years that unwanted pregnancies are the only risk of casual sex?
the smile/smirk leading up to the flash says it all. it was intentional.
I’m sure she was nervous because I believe she was planning to do this.
What she does is weird... I don't know if it's intentional. I have certainly never adjusted my top like that, but I have never been in a situation where I feel like I'll end up on TH-cam while being eaten up.
It was intentional, look at her hand movements at 4:22. She's been thinking about it since that moment. No women clutches their b00bies like that unless they itch or try to adjust their bras 😅
She has done this her whole life and blamed people just to get them arrested
This was not a debate. It was a display of tribal ignorance.
Her demeanor changed because she recognized Vivek's skin. No one believes she doesn't know who Charlie KIrk is but accidentally ended up at the mic.
It would have been advertised in the campus newspaper, there would be billboards about it. No one pushes to the front of a crowd to find out what's going on, they ask the people at the back first. She's a silly person out of her depth, precisely the type of person Charlie has the channel for to expose...
"Starting low, and uh..."
LMAO encapsulates the entire situation.
She 100% did it is obvious. The grabbing and pulling and constantly adjusting her clothes 😂
just my take, she is an attractive young woman that has never had a man contradict her or put her on the spot before. she went up to the microphone and was stymied when her bs was not accepted. so the only thing she had left to offer was her body.
"who are you" seems to be an appeal to authority. of course Professors can instruct, but he needs bona fides for her to listen on that one.
This woman is embarrassing
Immediately after pulling down her top, she stood there for a few moments completely unresponsive to the question that Kirk had just asked her, with this weird look on her face -- like she was getting a thrill out what she had just done by exposing herself.
It is unfair the my nipples can’t be banned from TH-cam 😔
She’s been run through by more traffic than the lincoln tunnel.
Was she a Diddy's house?
Vivek is such a star. Here he is actually looking to pull their two sides together, not to make her wrong etc...
What doesn't occur to this student is that SHE is the one with the advantage. After all, she, or any other student, can watch a bunch of Charlie Kirk videos and so they can know what he is going to say. Kirk, on the other hand, has no way of doing that for the students who challenge him.
Funny I watched this last week I think…
And never noticed that part. I was noticing that she couldn’t answer him..
and I’m a woman.., you are always pulling garments to be sure you’re covered… not the other way around.
She was for sure either trying to throw him off or change the energy.
And these grown men, they stayed focused… I love it
Which I seen the uncensored version and she really didn't reveal anything 😂! Now Charlie's next vid with the girl wearing the purple shirt 😳! Let's just say she made two good points 😂
That was an intentional flash. As a woman - and knowing how I expect my underwear to function (I know there are different fabrics, styles etc) they are designed to keep the ‘contents’ (😬) supported and….erm…. ‘Secure’ ☺️
She was stressed. Her fists clenched because of the stress. Her arms tightened. I don't think she could have planned it, while debating, while being as flustered as she was. Just an accident.
Agreed. She doesn’t seem self-aware enough to intentionally flash, but the unconscious is a big place. I also agree Kirk held her ire and her attitude did change talking to him. Kirk annoys me as well, but I’d never challenge him like this unless I had a detailed set of issues to debate.
The fact she focuses deceptive edits to “make people look stupid” shows that is her primary issue. She doesn’t like it when liberals appear ignorant, and maybe unconsciously fears liberals may be off course, but it is still easier to focus on conservatives being more wrong.
Anyway, a good opportunity lost for her. Are conservatives “mean”? Probably often, but she doesn’t want to see the moralizing emotionalism on the left is equally capable of “meanness”. She’ll likely find out if she starts criticizing her own side in coming years.
When she asked, “who are you?” she’s clearly trying to determine his relevance in the debate- she was asking, “why are you important in this discussion?” rather than literally questioning his identity.
I mean her thinking has obviously been hijacked by ‘the message’ and she’s confused but she’s in college- that’s where supposed to be figuring stuff out.
She won’t be like this in 20 years time - instead of focusing on her frankly, limited viewpoints we need to look at her inflexibility when it comes to her ability to think clearly and critically.
Focus on substance...focuss...fooocuussss ( . )
Why did Charlie and Vivek not focus on the substance, they were being very evasive and keeping eye contact while ignoring the exposed nipple is very disrespectful.
WARREN, "low hanging fruit" and "visible adjustment" are pretty hilarious word choice in the context of this video. Like a Freudian nip slip hahahaha..... on the real, though, do you have some audience capture going on already? Your personality and demeanor make you someone who could be an influencer that does more than just throw red meat to the right wing. You can be a voice of wisdom. I'm definitely going to follow your stuff, I respect you and I hope you set your sites on making things better. Don't just teach right-wingers how to own the libs. Teach people on both sides how to argue in good faith and reconcile. That's going to be a lot more challenging than taking a divisive approach. I'll be happy if you have a ratio of 50/50. You get engagement by dividing people, but you make your work meaningful by elevating people. The resentment itself is the enemy. We've got that on the left and also the right.
A dare? Maybe she made $50. or $100? Perhaps but you are completely clueless if you think this was unintentional. She begins to look like she is thinking about more than one thing after the first couple of minutes of engaging them and appears to be sinking into a sea of anxiety just before she pulls her breast out. You really can't read people at all if you don't feel the incident developing by the not feeling growing disconnect from what the gentleman are saying.
I've seen this video already and think Charlie cut the last shot.
Caught her pulling at her waistband too much, the open mouth, the hair-playing, and the 'you're 30 talking to kids right?' comment...
She, like many young attractive women, know exactly what they're doing.
Stay strong boys
Vivek humanised her by getting her to introduce herself & state here name, while also deflating her own "who are you?!" ad hominem statement.
O' Captain, My Captain! - I believe that when she said, "Who are you?!", she really meant to say, "Who do you think you are?!" Also, kudos for pointing out her change in demeanor once she started talking to Vivek. Based on my observations (regarding the nip slip), she knew what she was doing, and I believe that since they did not respond to her actions, she stopped.
3:15 he is actually talking to her in a nicer way than charlie Kirk. Charlie tends to word things in a way to embarrass people. It's good for internment but not great for encouraging conversations
3:48 she is correct and wrong, that's not what she meant probably.
7:20 nervous people tend to have a harder time thinking. She is right, about the spotlight. A wise saying is always go into a conversation assuming that you can learn something from the person.
She wasn't adjusting her clothes before, why suddenly grab a big chunk of your clothes and pull it down, and hold it down? She did it on purpose. Did she do it to "get him banned"? I don't know, they don't know. Her facial expression totally changed when she did it, too. She may have thought of it on the fly, or was nervous because she was planning on doing it, and just couldn't think and flash at the same time. Who knows, but personally, I think it was very purposeful.
As woman who is not a fan of Charlie Kirk, I think the girl purposely pulled her top down to expose herself because she was probably hoping YT would take down his channel when he said he posts unedited content in the video after she realized that her insults and disrespectful behavior didn't help the weak arguments she made. If she were to be so nervous, she wouldn't be going up to the microphone to begin with.
That was no accident in any way shape or form
Schrödinger's feminism: a woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.
Perfect example.
Women are forever saying they don't need us, just walk away, pay for nothing, give them nothing, let them enjoy being treated the way they treat men!
"Are you proud of coming to college campass and debating with students who aren't prepared."
She's going to struggle when she leaves the confort of college.
NO, dude. Laws that allow men to identify as women have a legal right to enter female spaces. It is clalled a LAW, for a reason. Prop 1 will be on the Ballot in November. Read it. Also read Title IX.