Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 392 Essential Mods & Upgrades | Inside Line

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ค. 2024
  • In this video, I'll cover the weak links on the Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 392, along with some key upgrades that will make yours drive better on-road and off.
    Nitto Trail Grapplers: www.nittotire.com/light-truck...
    Tazer JL Mini: www.zautomotive.com/product/z...
    RCV Performance axleshafts: www.rcvperformance.com/ultima...
    Warn winch plate: www.warn.com/winch-mount-2018...
    Warn VR 10-S Winch: www.warn.com/vr-evo-10-s-103253
    JKS Rear Bump Stops: jksmfg.com/products/jl-adjust...
    Fox Shocks: www.ridefox.com/family.php?m=...
    Stubby Antenna : a.co/d/cZ8G9ok
    00:00 Introduction
    00:13 Transfer Case Mod
    02:41 Control Arms
    03:30 Suspension Upgrades
    07:40 Exhaust Mod
    08:36 Bumper Upgrades
    10:02 Stubby antenna
    10:31 Axle Upgrades
    12:49 Wrap up
    Subscribe: th-cam.com/users/DrivingLine...
    Follow Driving Line on Facebook: / drivingline
    Follow Driving Line on Instagram: / drivingline
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 81

  • @x3thelast
    @x3thelast 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I have a MY 2023 JLUXR daily 37s on beadlocks and my balljoints are also still good at 24k miles. I’ve got the dynatracs on hand, but the OEM ones are still going strong.

  • @tomdeskins3544
    @tomdeskins3544 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for all of the tips. Much appreciated !

  • @cmwilfred
    @cmwilfred 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Love the idea of 2.5 Rear Bump Stops. Want to run the “24 392 on stock suspension and springs for a while but on “37 tires.

  • @jdetermann4674
    @jdetermann4674 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Another great video. Liked and subscribed!

  • @DUNEATV
    @DUNEATV 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video 🍻 Love the “Jeep” info!

  • @blakemarchand6650
    @blakemarchand6650 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hell yeah great video I like how the going fast in the desert part was towards me haha

  • @jesusglopez8430
    @jesusglopez8430 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for sharing.

  • @Joes-Adventures71
    @Joes-Adventures71 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You have the most useful info on my 392.i don't want to go crazy with expensive kits that are tens of thousands of dollars. Its pretty awesome from the factory. I just want to go from 35s to 37s and I'll be happy. The upgraded RCVs are high on my list because that 2 piece axle on the passenger side is silly.

    • @NoNamesAvailable81
      @NoNamesAvailable81 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I bought the lower arms from the Mopar kit (think

    • @JEEP-N-DIRT
      @JEEP-N-DIRT 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      FYI: The 2 piece isn't really all that weak. In fact, it was strong back in the YJ days up to 35's and with the JL platform it's much stronger. I understand the reason they designed that in again (for efficiency) but agree going to one piece axle shafts if the jeep is actually going to be used for crawling and some bumping over stuff is great peace of mind especially if running the best tire size for our JL's (38 inch) .

  • @MrRjezonie
    @MrRjezonie 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Clayton lift with DSCs are a great combo! Also ditching the suitcase muffler helps a ton. Brakes should be Brembos, standard on a 392. Mine sucked. Upgrade was needed for sure!

    • @scottleggejr
      @scottleggejr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yea I was stunned to see it have the same brakes as the 270hp engines 😂

  • @MrRjezonie
    @MrRjezonie 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Btw another great video!

  • @bobbymuy989
    @bobbymuy989 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Come to Cali let’s do the Rubicon trail!

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I did that drive with my Gladiator last year. I'm going back for sure, but next trip I want to bring my kids.

  • @NoNamesAvailable81
    @NoNamesAvailable81 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Tazer is great for any Rubicon - love the swaykill. Glad my Jeep didn't come with front bump extensions - lots of suspension travel with DSC shocks for 2-3" lift and 35s (just running a single hockey bump ext up front). I suppose one advantage of the extension is it gives you an excuse to go hydro to maximize up travel. My theory on ball joints: Hard hits equivalent to jumping a small curb with speed dents the plastic wear socket. Traditional "testing" of the ball joint doesn't reveal a problem, but Jeep has occasional shimmy or odd feeling in certain scenarios. Jeeper then gets frustrated trying to get dealer/mechanic to find/fix problem, sells the Jeep. Regardless of my theory, I love the Teraflex ball joints. Ran them hard for a few hundred desert miles, adjusted them, and they have been rock solid since.

  • @JeepTJ1999
    @JeepTJ1999 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    WELLLL....unfortunately my ball joints on my Gladiator did get bad with my 37s. I upgraded to an aftermarket all steel ball joint. Also replaced my OEM steering components with aftermarket heavy duty steering.

  • @CharlesCheeks
    @CharlesCheeks 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for another great video. As always, informative and entertaining. Quick question. Does your 4WD light flash or blink intermittently when in 2WD with the tazer? I could see mine flashing when I went into 2WD and it made me nervous so I wasn't using it.

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes. Mine does the same.

    • @CharlesCheeks
      @CharlesCheeks 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@DrivingLinethank you!

  • @hkatrib
    @hkatrib 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video. What about regearing to 4.56 for bigger tires?

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think 4.56 gears and 37s work great. I would want 4.88 for a 38.

  • @tomdeskins3544
    @tomdeskins3544 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sorry, forgot to ask you, are you using the FOX out of the box stock tune in the 392 Jeep 2.50 Elite DSC or did you have someone like Accutune do a custom tune for the shock ?

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mine came direct from JKS. No custom valving beyond the fact that they are JL specific.

  • @bencoyle7555
    @bencoyle7555 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I cannot stand the factory shocks that come on the 392. Fox 2.0”s are amazing, in fact, I have them on my lifted Ram 3500. They’re best when used for occasional off roading, but mostly on the road (so daily driver style). But when they’re put on a vehicle that’s made to be the best possible off roader from the ground up, and the people who buy a 392, 99% of the time they’re going to be driving them off road. Which isn’t what the Fox 2.0”s are made for. The Fox 2.5s and 3.0s are either the best or 2nd best off road shocks on the planet. And when it comes to off road racing (which is what the 392 is made for) they’re by far the best there is. Look what shocks come on vehicles like the Bronco Raptor, and F-150 Raptor/Raptor R, and Toyota Seqouia, Tacoma, 4Runner, and Tundra TRD Pros. They all use Fox 2.5s or 3.0s, why the hell does Jeep make this jeep $90,000+ but stick shitty daily driver shocks? I just ordered a 392 final edition, and as soon as I get it I will be lifting it and putting FOX 3.0s on.

  • @Garren.B
    @Garren.B 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Great video. Thank you! How makes the ditch light bracket?

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      They are from Seven Sparta. I bought them on Amazon. Here’s the link: Seven Sparta One Pair Light... www.amazon.com/dp/B0CCJJ5RN3?ref=ppx_pop_mob_ap_share

    • @Garren.B
      @Garren.B 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thank you!

  • @tomdeskins3544
    @tomdeskins3544 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would the Fox 2.5 DSC shocks fit without rubbing on your Dad's stock suspension XR with the 37's and 2" rear bump stop ?

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think you would need the 0 to 1.5 lift length shocks, but that should work.

  • @tomdeskins3544
    @tomdeskins3544 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That length works perfectly. But no worries about a 37” tire on stock XR wheels on stock suspension rubbing against the larger shock housing ?

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You will likely hit the resi hose in the front at full turn lock on the trail when the suspension is compressed ( articulated on one side or the other). The rear should clear since you are not charging the suspension travel amount.

  • @tomdeskins3544
    @tomdeskins3544 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have 5.0 back spacing and a smaller KO2 37" so I'll make it work even if I have to relocate the res. You have used the Fox bypass and the 2.5 DSC Elite.....Is the 3.0 that much better, or can you get close with the 2.5 DSC Elite for highway and moderate trail speeds ?

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m glad I went with the 3.0 with my Gladiator since it has so much unsprung weight. The 2.5 on my 392 feels fine. If I had one ton axles and 40’s, I would have gone 3.0.

  • @tumbes2000
    @tumbes2000 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Curious about your choice of 2.5 inch lift over 3.5 which seems what a lot of folks are going with. Also did you change out your front driveshaft with the lift

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I’m still using the stock front driveshaft. I went 2.5 because I knew I wanted 37s (which I ran stock). So, it didn’t need much lift.

  • @PrestonGladd
    @PrestonGladd 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I see you’re in North Carolina, I’m going to be moving there this summer, do you have a shop that you recommend? I’ll be both in the Asheville area and the Fayetteville area so really doesn’t need to be in a specific part of the state because I’m going to be traveling all over. I have a ‘21 392 XR and am currently living in Hawaii, so haven’t done much off-roading with it. However that will change and I want to make these upgrades you are recommending in this video. I have the skill to do the mods myself, I just would rather hire a trustworthy shop to do it.

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I’m in the eastern part of the state. I use a shop called Low Range 4x4 here in Wilmington for anything I can’t do myself. Asheville Vehicle Outfitters is a great shop that is more than capable of working on your 392. They are technically located just outside of Asheville, but not far.

    • @PrestonGladd
      @PrestonGladd 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@DrivingLine Thanks!

  • @irmadamian2760
    @irmadamian2760 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A QUE HOMBRE TAN GUAPO!!

  • @JEEP-N-DIRT
    @JEEP-N-DIRT 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Great stuff but here's a watch out for all: With lift and constant spinning front drive shaft we MUST prioritize pinion angle over castor to prevent vibrations. In the case of the 392 and the standard JL the stock Rzeppa style drive shaft will absorb (mask) any driveline vibrations up to a certain amount of lift with improper pinion angle but when (not if) the jeep owner upgrades to a double cardan drive shaft then the pinion angle will become ever more important which means you'll be back in the lower castor numbers again. That presents other issues like the spring pads being rotated causing some degree of spring bow followed by bump stops not aligning with the pad. Us do it your self old school guys will simply remove the axle, cut the purches, cut the C's / rotate and re-weld everything but many mall crawlers and weekend warriors will pay to have it done, and that's were the $$ come into play. There's the option of upgrading the front axle and ordering with extra castor but again usually means $$'s It's not doom and gloom but just food for thought. Lift and big tires is NEVER just a budget lift and basic stuff. There's cause and effect that trickles down the line. It's part of jeep life. 😀 For me I've owned my YJ for 27 years and plan on owning my built JLUR for 27 or more. I know my long term plan and cost, but for the new every two folks I say make sure to do it right the first time. Please Please spend the money up front and do it right. Put the good stuff on. You create GREAT deals for the folks who buy 2 or 3 years used. Think of it like you're investing in the future. Lol.

  • @aermotors
    @aermotors 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why do you need CV shafts in the front if you have disabled the AWD? Can you not go with traditional u-joint style upgraded shafts for a lot less than the RCV? Good video thanks!

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You don’t have to have a CV axle if you are going to run the Jeep in 2WD. The RCVs are more expensive, but significantly stronger. So, worth it in my opinion.

    • @aermotors
      @aermotors 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DrivingLine Yea makes sense. I would always love to get CVs but def spendy. Good info to have the option for both depending how you run it. Thanks!

  • @tomdeskins3544
    @tomdeskins3544 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    With your experience with them, how would you fix the front running issue?

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I moved to a wheel with 4.75 inches of backspacing. So, with 37’s and that wheel configuration, I clear them fine.

  • @rockyp544
    @rockyp544 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Will the tazer in 2wd, switch to awd in motion? Let’s say the weather changes suddenly from dry to heavy rain..

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You can program that function to the steering wheel. So you can easily toggle back-and-forth if you like. I wouldn’t do it while the Jeep is moving, but with a quick press of a button at a stoplight, it’ll convert back to 4Auto from 2WD.

    • @rockyp544
      @rockyp544 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@DrivingLine ok thanks. I did pre program to the steering wheel. Your video was a great help. I wasn’t sure if it was a good idea either on toggling the function in motion so I won’t risk it.✌️

  • @jeepn0811
    @jeepn0811 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What lights are you running on the front bumper?

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are CB60's Here's the link: gglights.com/collections/pods/products/amber-cb60-xl-sidewinder-led-pod

  • @frankdamelio8769
    @frankdamelio8769 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m in the market for a 392. Do I get sunset 2024 or save a bundle & get 2023 leftover. A bunch of them available. Also , sky top or OEM T-Top version?

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you can get a good deal on a 23, I would go that route. The upgrades on the 24 are not that significant that I would pay significantly more. The hard top with the factory sound deadening makes less noise and insulates the top better. However, the one touch top is way more convenient to use and you can pop the back side windows out, which is a nice feature. If you spend a lot of time on the interstate, I would go conventional hard top just for the noise reduction.

  • @Pe6rce
    @Pe6rce 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does the roof leak at all since it’s not a hard top roof?

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’ve never had an issue with the roof leaking.

  • @greghull3189
    @greghull3189 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Could not get the SGW plugs off on my ‘23 392. I tried for almost an hour pulling down on the plug and instead ended up with a torn finger from depressing that frigin clip too long. It’s almost like Stellantis has glued these in.

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s wild. I haven’t had an issue with them, but they are definitely a pain to get to.

    • @greghull3189
      @greghull3189 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DrivingLine Yes, so I did remove the kick panel and even tried using a hooked trim removal tool to pull down on the front part of the clip while depressing the tab to no avail.

  • @chrismarinock520
    @chrismarinock520 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I agree with your winch rating philosophy. To bad Jeep doest and installs a 8000lb winch from the factory and claims that's enough. What's up with that?

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Jeep fitting the 392 with an 8,000-pound winch is a real head scratcher. It’s fine for a two door, but even non-392 models it’s on the lighter end. I think someone goofed up and they are just rolling with it.

  • @Ihavetopoop718
    @Ihavetopoop718 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Didn't quite understand the argument about caster angle. When you increase caster angle the steering gets heavier not lighter as you're fighting the return to center more. The further forward you push the front axle and higher caster angle you get it tracks better and stays straighter but the steering should be heavier as it wants to return to center with more force so you fight that while turning.

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The castor angle from the factory is around 4 degrees on the 392. Putting an aftermarket lower arm it allows you to extend the arm to get around 6 degrees of caster, which will make it drive better. If you extended the upper arms, it would make the caster worse by driving the axle down.

    • @Ihavetopoop718
      @Ihavetopoop718 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@DrivingLine I agree on the better. For sure.

  • @blakemarchand6650
    @blakemarchand6650 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did you get a one piece or two piece axle from RCV ?

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      One piece.

    • @blakemarchand6650
      @blakemarchand6650 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DrivingLine any chance you have the part number ? 😅 aha I’m about to buy the same one-piece

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      www.rcvperformance.com/ultimate-dana-44-axle-cv-set-for-jeep-wrangler-jl-rubicon-1-piece.html

  • @kenwilliams4086
    @kenwilliams4086 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How much more does the V8 weigh over the V6?

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If I remember correctly, the 392 is a little over 200 pounds heavier than the 3.6l.

    • @kenwilliams4086
      @kenwilliams4086 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DrivingLine OK, 😊

  • @chrismarinock520
    @chrismarinock520 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I didnt take you for a Chinese Warn guy. 😅 Did you do the recall on it?

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I don’t know there was a recall on it. The Zeon wasn’t available when I ordered this one. Honestly, it’s probably fine for what I do with this Jeep.

  • @33Pikas
    @33Pikas 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Worst issue by far on the 392 is the tcase. Sucks that the only real solution to make the 392 usable offroad is to rip out the stock tcase and go the atlas route.

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There are a few shops mating Sport transfer cases with this one, which is an easier alternative to the Altas. I figure I will eventually need to swap mine, but I'm going to try and run it stock for as long as I can.

  • @jafletcher5105
    @jafletcher5105 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It looks like you forgot the ling for the stubby antenna.

    • @DrivingLine
      @DrivingLine  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep! I just added it. Here's the link: a.co/d/cZ8G9ok

  • @chaleowin7732
    @chaleowin7732 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Must have a sh*t ton of money.

  • @monette44
    @monette44 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1