Ah - I see the problem here. You need to watch more Phys Vids by EK ;) The metal licks make in to quite a few of the videos. PVEK is, by far, my favorite hard science channel on this psychotic platform.
Agreed. You don't see the surface tension effects because it isn't a fluid. The blocks are supported by the lattice applying static forces anisotropically, which fluids cannot do. You can tell this because the block is neither rising or sinking. Once the surface closes over the top of the block it should sink. In the very strong force case you would expect it to be expelled somewhat.
@@BariumCobaltNitrog3n I really don't understand your argument. In one reply you say everyone should learn atomic behavior in one semester. In the next reply, you concede that atomic behavior is complex enough that solving equations doesn't let you understand the behavior in a more intuitive way.
Or the surface of each sphere if they are made of a substance that repels the liquid they’re in? Can the whole thing generate electricity? Imagine this in the tarmac of streets and in the cars’ wheels turning friction into electricity. Or such material in the soles of shoes- people charging their mobile phone when running- I reckon many would take up jogging or being physically active. I don’t know what I’m talking about, never likes maths or physics. But sometimes it’s fun to imagine stuff.
Friction is causing heat, nuclear reactors water is heated to turn turbines with a dynamo. So you would need to somehow take the heat from your shoe and send it to a turbine, really complicated and a shoe is generating so little friction that just building such a device probably takes more energy than it will ever generate @@claudiamanta1943
I suppose the "surface" thing only means it's gonna make a difference for you only as long as the effect is strong enough AND you're still above the surface. If the attraction is too weak to keep you above and you fell through the surface, you're just going to keep sinking as you normally would...
Visualization combined with a rare talent for explanation, I observe the efforts that go into these videos. I am awed by the results of the hard work. Congratulations to your narrator, to you and whoever else is involved in these efforts. There is the hard work, but also the love of your subjects. A decade of product, that I hope will inspire those at whom you aimed it. Too late for me, I am afraid, though I use this resource to clarify my muddled understanding, That much you have done for me. I am grateful. For the young up-and-comers, I hope they take advantage of what you laid out for them. They can use these lessons to forge ahead, to understand and develop further what old people like me, can no longer do.
I would like to see another demonstration with the red box, but this time with the combined effects of attractive forces, both between the balls and eachother, and also between them and the walls.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky I did engineering originally (medicine afterwards). I wish we had you as our professor in the old days. We were given textbooks and told to read things up. There was very little explanation. You turn difficult concepts into easily understandable subjects.
You need to explain fluid exposed to air that has O2 and Nitrogen. Non zero force on the air liquid interface. Surface tension is more than what you said 😅
@@priyakulkarni9583 What does that have to do with the animation? I think it is a good emulation of surface tension of water in a hydrophobic flask. The animation i believe backs that because its just a simplification of the forces involved.
@@jnr2349 The presence of air at the surface of water can indeed affect surface tension. Oxygen and nitrogen molecules from the air can dissolve in water, and this dissolved gas content can influence the properties of the water surface. However, the impact on surface tension is not typically significant compared to other factors. Surface tension is primarily determined by the cohesive forces between water molecules at the surface. While dissolved gases can influence the surface tension to some extent, their effect is generally minimal compared to other factors such as temperature, contamination, or the presence of surfactants.
It would also be great to see a) walls with repulsive forces and 2) blocks with attractive or repulsive forces. A block that is attracted to the strongly attracted spheres would break through the surface tension. A block that is strongly repelled by the spheres would act spherophobic.
is 'surface' tension a bad name then since the attractive forces are consistent in the entirety of the fluid, and not just at the surface? and is the surface tension equal to the attraction force of the molecules between each other, or is dependent on other factors like density / velocity of the object coming into contact with the fluid?
It is interesting how to balls with zero attractive forces look like metal grains. I wonder if there is some similar mechanism occurring there. If so, then by making the particles of metal attracted to each other it would be possible to make a solid, aligned crystal structure. Something similar to diamond perhaps?
Cool video! I'd never really thought about how surface tension works! I'm curious as to whether this model can explain how 'breaking' surface tension would allow an object previously held up to sink to the bottom. It's strange how it's called surface tension when the attraction between the liquids' molecules is present throughout.. Is it stronger at the surface?
It is different at the surface because the forces from the other molecules of the liquid are not balanced out in all directions, as they are internal to the liquid.
Water: moderate self-attraction and attractive wall (dip in the surface). Mercury: moderate self-attraction, no attractive wall (bulge in surface). Liquefied helium, or any "superfluid": no self-attraction, attractive wall (climbs wall). There are other combinations in the video and other associated physical scenarios, but these are the most commonly discussed.
Came for the surface tension, left the vid finally understanding how liquid helium's superfluidity works after 14 years after first being exposed to the concept, as well as feeling stupid for not figuring it out myself.
In the animation with the box and green spheres. If the box would completely penetrate the first layer of fluid, so it's under the surface, will it continue to sink? In the animation the fluid behaves almost like a solid so I wonder. In theory the box should completely sink.
From 2:35 to 3:31 makes me wondering if surface tension and buoyancy could be related, because the box never fully sinks or touch the bottom of the container, hence it floats somehow.
So this would explain meniscus in a test tube? Oh, and it's hard to pay attention to the narrator b/c of how FIRE the guitar solo in the background is lol
@@EugeneKhutoryansky amazing, you have a wonderful way of explaining complicated things. I always look forward to your videos, you are doing humanity a good service. Thank you!
I wrote python code which is a plug in into the simulation program "Poser Physics", which is a plug in into the Poser animation software. I explain how I make my 3D animations in my video at th-cam.com/video/6Hl5dvA88Uo/w-d-xo.html
For 3 dimensions, I need to simulate a much larger number of spheres to be able to have a fluid of sufficient height. The greater the number of spheres, the more time is necessary to calculate the simulation. I don't think my computer would be able to complete a simulation with this many spheres in a reasonable amount of time.
Газ в узком месте движется с большей скоростью и уравновешивает концы - вихрем. Вихревой поток имплозивен, и потому давление на стенки падает. Примерно как если бы вы протягивали резиновый жгут сквозь трубу. Чем сильнее тянешь, тем тоньше резинка и меньше сопротивление поверхности... P.S.: Денежку за сопричастие к экспрессивному открытию присылать на карту.
Particles don't settle in a honeycomb lattice without changing it's state of matter. A more accurate simulation would be if brownian motion would be properly simulated, because it's really misleading as this is looks right now.
I'm guessing this is how fluids in a heatpipe work: the heat reduces molecule self attractiveness, thereby making it travel toward the section where the molecules detract from the walls.
I would not have expected the prog metal soundtrack behind this physics demonstration
Actually, every single concept in physics is associated with, and mysteriously dependent on, a genre of rock 'n roll.
Physics rocks
Ikr it's awesome 😃
Professor Neal Morse
Ah - I see the problem here. You need to watch more Phys Vids by EK ;)
The metal licks make in to quite a few of the videos. PVEK is, by far, my favorite hard science channel on this psychotic platform.
That superfluid wall-climb was so cool!
I am glad you liked it. The friction was set to zero. Thanks.
Yes, I immediately thought "they've created liquid helium".
Same thought!
@@zh84 Not just liquid
Kerosine does that
the explanation:🤓☝
the background music:🤘🔥🤘
I would have liked to see it at "higher temperatures". So they don't form a lattice. Otherwise great as always
I cover that in my video "Molecular Temperature & Degrees of Freedom" at th-cam.com/video/nqGtji3ZjoI/w-d-xo.html
Thanks.
Agreed. You don't see the surface tension effects because it isn't a fluid. The blocks are supported by the lattice applying static forces anisotropically, which fluids cannot do. You can tell this because the block is neither rising or sinking. Once the surface closes over the top of the block it should sink. In the very strong force case you would expect it to be expelled somewhat.
What material irl is that green balls?
@@EugeneKhutoryansky Thank you so much for being so awesome?
Rockin' fluid surface tension
🎸 ✅️
It explains the Naruto music.
You have a real talent for explaining physical phenomena more intuitively in mere minutes than years of studying in a university.
Thanks for the compliment.
years? How many times did you take intro to physics, like 12?
@@BariumCobaltNitrog3nEverything, not just this topic. Learning equations also doesn't give you intuitive knowledge.
@@umeng2002The behavior of atomic forces is not intuitive. Did you learn anything in all those years?
@@BariumCobaltNitrog3n I really don't understand your argument. In one reply you say everyone should learn atomic behavior in one semester. In the next reply, you concede that atomic behavior is complex enough that solving equations doesn't let you understand the behavior in a more intuitive way.
Awesome. I always thought surface tension is such that a strong film/sheet/layer forms on the "surface" of a fluid. This is an eye opener for me
well, surface tension is a direct consequence of the attraction between the fluid's molecules - a symptom, if you will
Or the surface of each sphere if they are made of a substance that repels the liquid they’re in?
Can the whole thing generate electricity? Imagine this in the tarmac of streets and in the cars’ wheels turning friction into electricity. Or such material in the soles of shoes- people charging their mobile phone when running- I reckon many would take up jogging or being physically active.
I don’t know what I’m talking about, never likes maths or physics. But sometimes it’s fun to imagine stuff.
Friction is causing heat, nuclear reactors water is heated to turn turbines with a dynamo. So you would need to somehow take the heat from your shoe and send it to a turbine, really complicated and a shoe is generating so little friction that just building such a device probably takes more energy than it will ever generate @@claudiamanta1943
I suppose the "surface" thing only means it's gonna make a difference for you only as long as the effect is strong enough AND you're still above the surface. If the attraction is too weak to keep you above and you fell through the surface, you're just going to keep sinking as you normally would...
The surface thing is because it resist increase in the liquid's surface @@AttilaAsztalos
Awesome friend
Carry on
This video provides me with a clear picture on viscosity and intermolecular force
Thanks. I am glad my video was helpful.
I am a physics teacher and this is easily the best explanation 😊
Thanks for the compliment about my explanation.
Jiggly Balls are the best friend for anyone who's trying to learn the world arround in an intuitive way.
Jiggly Balls 🤤🤤
bet
i'm happy this channel still produces videos, i remember discovering it back when i was a first year engineering student.
I am glad you enjoy my videos. Thanks.
Explanation was so amazing even with such simple topic. Thanks!
Thanks.
really love eugene's animations and kira's voice.
Thanks.
Magnificent (as always)! A big thank to you.
Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.
Reached 1 million subscribers. Congratulations 🎊 👏 💐 🥳 🎊
Thanks.
Fantastic explanations and visuals, as always!
Thanks.
OMG Eugene returned! you was the first channel I followed almost 8 years ago
Thanks for following me for 8 years.
Visualization combined with a rare talent for explanation, I observe the efforts that go into these videos. I am awed by the results of the hard work. Congratulations to your narrator, to you and whoever else is involved in these efforts. There is the hard work, but also the love of your subjects. A decade of product, that I hope will inspire those at whom you aimed it. Too late for me, I am afraid, though I use this resource to clarify my muddled understanding, That much you have done for me. I am grateful. For the young up-and-comers, I hope they take advantage of what you laid out for them. They can use these lessons to forge ahead, to understand and develop further what old people like me, can no longer do.
Thanks for the compliments.
"@user" "MEANS BOT
The video: 🙂
The music: 😈🎸🎸🤘
Love the content and the music!
Thanks.
Another great video, thank you!
Thanks.
Great video as always!
Thanks.
This channel is so great.
Thanks for the compliment.
Your channel is wonderful. You explain physics better than the books of physicists themselves❤️
Thanks for the compliments.
Awesome as usual
Thanks for the compliment.
This is amazing work!
Thanks for the compliment.
1 mil subs, congrats!
Thanks.
Love this stuff
As always, a clear and helpful visualization!
Thanks.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky 👍
Excellent presentation.
Thanks.
I understand super fluids much better now. Thank you.
Thanks.
As a chemist this remind me and clear many aspects of my capilar tube knowledge!
Wait , sone
Great video, Thanks
Thanks.
I would like to see another demonstration with the red box, but this time with the combined effects of attractive forces, both between the balls and eachother, and also between them and the walls.
good demonstration of the concept
Thanks.
This video puts a whole new meaning to math-core
Very nice explanation
I am glad you liked my explanation. Thanks.
Finally a good video of Van der Walls forces.
So insightful video
Please make one on mercury and water comparing
As usual - excellent.
Thanks.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky I did engineering originally (medicine afterwards). I wish we had you as our professor in the old days. We were given textbooks and told to read things up. There was very little explanation. You turn difficult concepts into easily understandable subjects.
all your videos are cool
Thanks.
Amazing !
Thanks.
Get this channel to 1 Million subs!
😰 PLEASE SAVE JAPAN FROM 👳☪️🕋🕌
Nice, Eugene still making vids
You did it bro! 1 milliyiones subscriberionezzzz ma man yezzurrrr
Thanks.
Very cool. Much admiration. I see hydrophobic container behaviors on the fluid when moderate surface tension and no wall attraction.
You need to explain fluid exposed to air that has O2 and Nitrogen. Non zero force on the air liquid interface. Surface tension is more than what you said 😅
@@priyakulkarni9583 Not sure of what you said, but if correct then it is emulation.
@@jnr2349
Atmospheric pressure of air that is on the surface of liquid has O2 and Nitrogen molecules interacting.
@@priyakulkarni9583 What does that have to do with the animation? I think it is a good emulation of surface tension of water in a hydrophobic flask. The animation i believe backs that because its just a simplification of the forces involved.
@@jnr2349
The presence of air at the surface of water can indeed affect surface tension. Oxygen and nitrogen molecules from the air can dissolve in water, and this dissolved gas content can influence the properties of the water surface. However, the impact on surface tension is not typically significant compared to other factors.
Surface tension is primarily determined by the cohesive forces between water molecules at the surface. While dissolved gases can influence the surface tension to some extent, their effect is generally minimal compared to other factors such as temperature, contamination, or the presence of surfactants.
Good explanation
Thanks.
It would also be great to see a) walls with repulsive forces and 2) blocks with attractive or repulsive forces. A block that is attracted to the strongly attracted spheres would break through the surface tension. A block that is strongly repelled by the spheres would act spherophobic.
The music is rather distracting. But I appreciate that you took the time to lower the volume during narration. It helps.
I wish that I could subscribe however many times are required to get you to one million. Your videos are great.
Thanks for the compliment about my videos.
Is it possible to simulate soil by giving the spheres high friction coefficient and no attraction either between the balls nor the wall?
😱🤯💗 great stuff. Wonder whose using this for nano chemistry or nano sensing and detection type stuff?!?
There are so many different effects that this makes clear.
Thanks.
Good video
Thanks
is 'surface' tension a bad name then since the attractive forces are consistent in the entirety of the fluid, and not just at the surface? and is the surface tension equal to the attraction force of the molecules between each other, or is dependent on other factors like density / velocity of the object coming into contact with the fluid?
It is interesting how to balls with zero attractive forces look like metal grains. I wonder if there is some similar mechanism occurring there. If so, then by making the particles of metal attracted to each other it would be possible to make a solid, aligned crystal structure. Something similar to diamond perhaps?
Amazing work! 👍 What software did you use for this simulation?
Thanks. I used "Poser Physics." I explain how I make my 3D animations in my video at th-cam.com/video/6Hl5dvA88Uo/w-d-xo.html
This channel has always had the strangest music. I love it! 😊
Man, this music. Is this a science lesson or a commercial for the US Army?
Does the video apply to the liquid meniscus seen in a graduated cylinder ?
Yes.
Yay!
This is an amazing visualization. I found surface tension hard to understand until watching this.
I am glad my video was helpful. Thanks.
Thanks!
You are welcome and thanks.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky getting a comment from you is like having the privilege to see whole milky way in person from space. Thanks teacher 🥺
It's modeling surface tension as it actually occurs on the atomic level. How cool!
Thanks.
Cool video! I'd never really thought about how surface tension works! I'm curious as to whether this model can explain how 'breaking' surface tension would allow an object previously held up to sink to the bottom. It's strange how it's called surface tension when the attraction between the liquids' molecules is present throughout.. Is it stronger at the surface?
It is different at the surface because the forces from the other molecules of the liquid are not balanced out in all directions, as they are internal to the liquid.
Do the 3 types of sphere you show here correlated to any real world substances? Which one would water be closest to?
Water: moderate self-attraction and attractive wall (dip in the surface). Mercury: moderate self-attraction, no attractive wall (bulge in surface). Liquefied helium, or any "superfluid": no self-attraction, attractive wall (climbs wall). There are other combinations in the video and other associated physical scenarios, but these are the most commonly discussed.
Looks like a capillary action experiment we did in grade school- but bigger.
Awesome
Thanks.
I'm here for the metal power ballad in the background \m/
i subconsiouly screamed "liquid helium!" In my mind at 1:14
Came for the surface tension, left the vid finally understanding how liquid helium's superfluidity works after 14 years after first being exposed to the concept, as well as feeling stupid for not figuring it out myself.
In the animation with the box and green spheres.
If the box would completely penetrate the first layer of fluid, so it's under the surface, will it continue to sink?
In the animation the fluid behaves almost like a solid so I wonder.
In theory the box should completely sink.
What would happen if the red square started mid-way in to the balls? In other words, what explains the "surface" in surface tension, under this model?
Amazing........
Which softwares use for these videos?
Thanks. I explain how I make my 3D animations in my video at th-cam.com/video/6Hl5dvA88Uo/w-d-xo.html
From 2:35 to 3:31 makes me wondering if surface tension and buoyancy could be related, because the box never fully sinks or touch the bottom of the container, hence it floats somehow.
Stronger attractive forces, higher density, so higher buoyancy
Got distracted by the background guitar shredding.
my favorite surface tension is the one with the cool green goggles guy in it
The music is so lit
So this would explain meniscus in a test tube?
Oh, and it's hard to pay attention to the narrator b/c of how FIRE the guitar solo in the background is lol
Yes, this explains meniscus in a test tube.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky amazing, you have a wonderful way of explaining complicated things. I always look forward to your videos, you are doing humanity a good service. Thank you!
Thanks for the compliments.
Thanks babe
The background music choices were weirdly diverse; from heavy metal to Catalonian baroque chamber music
Nice
Thanks
Are these simulations running on propeietary software or is it libre? I'm interested in learning how to make this, or at least use it.
I wrote python code which is a plug in into the simulation program "Poser Physics", which is a plug in into the Poser animation software. I explain how I make my 3D animations in my video at th-cam.com/video/6Hl5dvA88Uo/w-d-xo.html
@@EugeneKhutoryansky thank you!
Quite the soundtrack going on here 😂
Have you tried doing the superliquid simulation with three dimensions?
For 3 dimensions, I need to simulate a much larger number of spheres to be able to have a fluid of sufficient height. The greater the number of spheres, the more time is necessary to calculate the simulation. I don't think my computer would be able to complete a simulation with this many spheres in a reasonable amount of time.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky I thought as much; what you've already is pretty cool nonetheless!
Газ в узком месте движется с большей скоростью и уравновешивает концы - вихрем. Вихревой поток имплозивен, и потому давление на стенки падает.
Примерно как если бы вы протягивали резиновый жгут сквозь трубу. Чем сильнее тянешь, тем тоньше резинка и меньше сопротивление поверхности...
P.S.: Денежку за сопричастие к экспрессивному открытию присылать на карту.
❤❤
cool
Particles don't settle in a honeycomb lattice without changing it's state of matter. A more accurate simulation would be if brownian motion would be properly simulated, because it's really misleading as this is looks right now.
I have a video on Brownian Motion at th-cam.com/video/V7VtOa8pHno/w-d-xo.html
Finally I understand
I'm guessing this is how fluids in a heatpipe work: the heat reduces molecule self attractiveness, thereby making it travel toward the section where the molecules detract from the walls.
Liked and subbed 🏆
I am glad you liked my video and I am glad to have you as a subscriber.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky
I usually binge-watch a few in a row
Excellent animation
Excellent explanation
Thank you thank you
Thanks for the compliments.
So there is no "film" or something like that on the surface of a drop of water?
Water is H2O. There is nothing for a film on the surface to be made out of, other than more H2O.
Awesome as always.
Sick guitar BGM! Can you share the artist?
Thanks. All the music in this video is from the free TH-cam audio library, and the names of the songs are the following.
Double_Helix
Road_to_Moscow
Can you make a video cover the topic of population inversion and negative temperature?
I will add that to my list of topics for future videos. Thanks.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky Thank you! ❤️
Aren't the green spheres basically a solid?
Wait, does temperature influence surface tension? I guess so. Fun that I learned something.
Where did the kinetic energy go? Is there friction in these models?
In this model, the friction was set to zero, but inelastic collisions were used.
1:11 seems to resemble Superfluid behaviour? (no attraction between fluid molecules but attraction to wall)
Osaka brings the science yet again.
How about a video on those breakthrough Chinese nuclear batteries?
Does anyone know what the 2nd song is?
Road_to_Moscow from the free TH-cam audio library