Glad it was helpful! If you like our video lessons, it would be appreciated if you could leave us a review at www.trustpilot.com/review/analystprep.com
Glad it was helpful! If you like our video lessons, it would be appreciated if you could take 2 minutes of your time to leave us a Google review using this link: g.page/r/CQIlM78xSg01EB0/review
Glad you think so. If you like our video lessons, it would be appreciated if you could take 2 minutes of your time to leave us a Google review using this link: g.page/r/CQIlM78xSg01EB0/review
All 2024/2025 premium videos, including study notes, question bank, mock exams, and formula sheet are available in the following package: analystprep.com/shop/cfa-level-3-complete-course-by-analystprep/
Hi, great video! I have a question regarding the Harmonic mean. You mentioned that the it takes into account the amounts invested in the example ($2000, $3000, $4000), however the solution only takes into account the price of the shares. Therefore if the amounts invested were different, the answer would have remained the same as the above mentioned amounts were not used in the calculation? Am I missing something?
No. The weighted average is more appropriate to use in this case. The arithmetic mean is actually closer to the actual mean. The harmonic mean used in this case is a misapplication because you have different amounts of investments used in different periods
Glad it was helpful! If you like our video lessons, it would be appreciated if you could take 2 minutes of your time to leave us a Google review using this link: g.page/r/CQIlM78xSg01EB0/review
Glad it was helpful! If you like our video lessons, it would be appreciated if you could take 2 minutes of your time to leave us a Google review using this link: g.page/r/CQIlM78xSg01EB0/review
Not trying to be too picky but you often assume you're talking to people who have (or are getting) a degree in finance. I do not have that background so many times, these "elementary" ideas are new to me. Comments that suggest I should already know this material are both discouraging and unhelpful. But I like your videos, so I appreciate the content and it is (for the most part) helpful.
thank you so... much for this explanation and thanks a lot for making it free cuz there are a lot of students who cant afford for these coaching
Glad it was helpful! If you like our video lessons, it would be appreciated if you could leave us a review at www.trustpilot.com/review/analystprep.com
I just finished this chapter and your video is great for revision and confirm my understandings :) Thank you Professor!
Glad it was helpful! If you like our video lessons, it would be appreciated if you could take 2 minutes of your time to leave us a Google review using this link: g.page/r/CQIlM78xSg01EB0/review
Came over here from FM. Thanks for the different perspective!
Welcome!
40:24 HPR year 1 should be negative -0.1136 ?
Hello, I did not quite get the solution for real return. Why did we ignore the rest of the stuff?
I am really grateful! Well presented! :)
Glad you think so. If you like our video lessons, it would be appreciated if you could take 2 minutes of your time to leave us a Google review using this link: g.page/r/CQIlM78xSg01EB0/review
I'm confused. In 51:43. (1 + real return) = (1+ Nominal risk free rate).... ???
Hi Prof, really appreciate your video. Can you please make a playlist containing CFA Level 1 2024 programme? Really appreciate
All 2024/2025 premium videos, including study notes, question bank, mock exams, and formula sheet are available in the following package: analystprep.com/shop/cfa-level-3-complete-course-by-analystprep/
Request you to upload videos for quants cfa level 1 of calculators
EACH SUM OF TOPIC WITH USE OF CALCULATOR
thanks but how you calculate the 90 percentiles for the winsorized mean
Hi, great video! I have a question regarding the Harmonic mean. You mentioned that the it takes into account the amounts invested in the example ($2000, $3000, $4000), however the solution only takes into account the price of the shares. Therefore if the amounts invested were different, the answer would have remained the same as the above mentioned amounts were not used in the calculation? Am I missing something?
Is there any way we can calculate the annualized return example (Bond A 120 days, Bond B 8 months..) on ICONV?
Is the answer of harmonic mean correct? Can we still use the same formula when we are not using fixed amount of investment?
No. The weighted average is more appropriate to use in this case. The arithmetic mean is actually closer to the actual mean. The harmonic mean used in this case is a misapplication because you have different amounts of investments used in different periods
For the Time-Weighted Return Example at 40:00, shouldn't the Time-Weighted Return be 17.5%? It's 17.4675% which should be rounded up, right?
yea
Thanks a lot for your tutorial.
Glad it was helpful! If you like our video lessons, it would be appreciated if you could take 2 minutes of your time to leave us a Google review using this link: g.page/r/CQIlM78xSg01EB0/review
Very helpful thank you
Glad it was helpful! If you like our video lessons, it would be appreciated if you could take 2 minutes of your time to leave us a Google review using this link: g.page/r/CQIlM78xSg01EB0/review
Hello
How did you come up with 0.97 in the Geometric mean return?
1-.03
Not trying to be too picky but you often assume you're talking to people who have (or are getting) a degree in finance. I do not have that background so many times, these "elementary" ideas are new to me. Comments that suggest I should already know this material are both discouraging and unhelpful. But I like your videos, so I appreciate the content and it is (for the most part) helpful.
If you can't understand - it means, this is far ahead of you.
@@musad849 I disagree