Actually that is true why? China they have war ship's but never test in real war in this generation. They have millions of military personnel but don't have experience in real war in this generation
imagine China join the “one Taiwan “ policy and Russia join the “one Ukraine “ policy and become a free and democratic country, then the world will be at peace
@@DavidLe-xw2qfyou are wrong. Which country had the most wars or conflicts during the last few decades? United states is the trouble maker not China or Russia.
I m a Vietnamese-American, and I can tell you now, the US stacked bodies in Vietnam. They lost objectively sure, but the North Vietnamese lost 5 soldiers for every American KIA. And that's with the US heavily handicapping itself and avoiding a complete take over of NV in fear of expanding the war by having China join in. Ever since WWII, there has never been a single conflict where the US has deployed even 100% of its active force in a conflict. The closest we got was the Persian Gulf Wars and we ended Iraq's ability to operate as a military within days, despite being across the globe.
That was long time ago. Where talking about the situation now. USA 🇺🇸 is the only war machine perfect and tested in real war in this generation. While china only bullying and threatening experience but real war china don't have experience even Chinese military personnel don't have experience in real war in this generation
I agree, but CSIS played a war game on the assumption that the performance of American and Chinese weapons was equal. In fact, there's a difference in performance between U.S. and Chinese weapons. Most American weapons are much better.
Agree with everyone: It's just a simulation based upon whatever parameters were cooked into the program. But: A couple of facts regarding Vietnam... 1) The US was not defeated by the North Vietmanese on the battlefield, except for a few engagements spread over the 8 years of the war. 2) The US Army was a conscript army of mostly draftees. Junior officers were often right out of academy or given rank and quick training in OCS because they had a diploma or degree. Higher officers were often "cold" haviong no recent experience since Korea - a very different kind of war. That is precisely why the Green Berets were formed. Small groups of Special Forces destroyed enemy forces again and again. Occasionaly, theywere also destroyed, but it was rare. 3) Viet Cong and NVA were also drafted, but were defending their land. Many officers were veterans with deep experience against the French, and some were old enough to have fought the Japanese. All historians have a lot of respect for the North Vietnamese Army. 4) The US was defeated on it's own soil by college Communist students and Leftist Media, which was successful in turning politcal will against the war. The US bombing of North Vietnam was so successful and unstoppable that US Media focused attention on it more than anything else. The nightly News always reported casualties and showed the destruction in th eNorth. The American People are not war mongerers and turned against the War even more. 5) The North withdrew from the Paris Peace Talks. Nixon ordered a doubling of the bombing. It was at this time that Kissinger secretly told the North that Nixon was insane and wanted to obliterate all of North Vietnam - and that the US could do it within a year. The North believed it, and returned to the peace talks. IMPORTANT: At the same time, the US was puttig forth signals toChina that the US wished to "normalize" relations. This was horrifying to the both the North Vietnamese, and to Russia. This happened in 1974, and took China out of theSoviet spere of influence 6) The US was politically restrained in its conduct of the war. If the US had been fighting with all its abilities, there would be one big beach resort from the Chinese border all the way to the tip of South Vietnam, and the people of Vietnam would be as rich or richer than South Korea is today. Pol Pot would have never gained control of Cambodia, and the Chinese would not be threatening Vietnam and everyone else in the South China Sea dispute. The Philipines would still have a major US base there - which everyone agrees was the worst drawback of US forces in the world, given the rise of China now. All events from the US pullout of Vietnam have contributed to two things in Asia: A) the rise of China, which threatens all countries where ever they go. B) thus, forcing the resurgence of an armed and technically advanced Japan, with a new Nationalist agenda. Food for thought?
Actually there is, we just don't mention them usually. People forget the US can obliterate a Satellite going beyond Mach 10+ in space while the Patriot PAC-2 and PAC-3 missiles are designed to shoot down ballistic missiles going up to Mach fucking 20 and works effectively especially if said missile to heading towards the system. China doesn't have "hypersonic" they have over glorified shaped ballistic missiles that needs a complex kill-chain that can be broken by literally just turning the steering wheel and changing direction. But analysts and military experts has to take what China say because they haven't actually demonstrated the ballistic missile can even do anything. Hell in the past couple of years, China been caught still trying to hit a moving train as target practice and still somehow fucking missed.
@itch4travel literally shot down 2 satellites on two different platforms with 2 different missiles on 2 different occasions. The F-15 shot down a satellite in a weapons test using an experimental/modified missile. A Arleigh Burke destroyer, the USS Lake Erie, with a modified SM-3 that took only weeks to made to shoot down a dead spy sat.
@@itch4travelumm, u do realize that satalites travel over 17,000 mph in orbit right? Us has destroyed more than a few ..in fact about 7. Does that explain it enough for you?😮
China will launch not dozens but hundreds of missiles and drones, if not thousands, against one single carrier group. Every ship in the carrier group will get overwhelmed. There is no way any carrier group off the sea but near China at the start of the hostilities would survive. China will lose in the end. But at the cost of entire carrier groups for the US, a lot of planes, and hundreds of thousands of troops for the US and its allies like Japan, the Philippines, Australia and others.
The voice actors must have had so much fun making this.
Actually that is true why? China they have war ship's but never test in real war in this generation. They have millions of military personnel but don't have experience in real war in this generation
Because China is a peace loving country.
USA have so much war experiences and they still got their asses kicked in Vietnam and afganistan
@@dand4075 WHAT? I thought China is greed and loving money😅
Correct they are lack of experience in actual war only in paper
Agree
Another awesome vid bro!!! Please keep them coming.... absolutely love it!
Great videos! Thank you!
Thanks for sharing
evil will not prevail over good
West is evil, track record of violence shows it clearly
The world does not need war but peace
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
Agree, better Peace than War.
imagine China join the “one Taiwan “ policy and Russia join the “one Ukraine “ policy and become a free and democratic country, then the world will be at peace
@@DavidLe-xw2qfyou are wrong. Which country had the most wars or conflicts during the last few decades? United states is the trouble maker not China or Russia.
Communists does not want peace.
Planes are able to take off from Chinese aircraft carriers but not land.
And that's kind of important.
Why isn’t the Rapid Dragon used in any of these videos?
I loved the "Xi Jinpooh". OUTSTANDING.
Strategy against strategy. Thou how strong your armed forces. Remember, U.S. looses to Vietnam.
But Vietnam did not even touch US soil.😅
I m a Vietnamese-American, and I can tell you now, the US stacked bodies in Vietnam. They lost objectively sure, but the North Vietnamese lost 5 soldiers for every American KIA. And that's with the US heavily handicapping itself and avoiding a complete take over of NV in fear of expanding the war by having China join in.
Ever since WWII, there has never been a single conflict where the US has deployed even 100% of its active force in a conflict. The closest we got was the Persian Gulf Wars and we ended Iraq's ability to operate as a military within days, despite being across the globe.
That was long time ago. Where talking about the situation now. USA 🇺🇸 is the only war machine perfect and tested in real war in this generation. While china only bullying and threatening experience but real war china don't have experience even Chinese military personnel don't have experience in real war in this generation
@@kerblingtime USA USA godbless you my fellow American 🇺🇸
No our politicians withdrew our troops. The air war would have caused surrender but it was stopped.
Nice simulation.
in actual war you can not know which country will loss.
I agree, but CSIS played a war game on the assumption that the performance of American and Chinese weapons was equal.
In fact, there's a difference in performance between U.S. and Chinese weapons. Most American weapons are much better.
In the Korean War, the weapons gap between China and the United States is even greater than today. What is the ending?
@@milsimkAmerican weapons is tested already
in actual war, US is already superior. they already got the needed info from the current Ukraine invasion.
CSIS played several wargames where both US and Chinese equipment were Equal
The Wargame ended in an American Victory, even with Exact Parity
I like your horror movies very much.
History repeat itself we can not avoid because of the greadenes.of the bad people.
They can still clap clapbtheir hands men.
Talk big no problem but when the time comes, nobody knows who will win. However, both sides will lose too
Agree with everyone: It's just a simulation based upon whatever parameters were cooked into the program.
But: A couple of facts regarding Vietnam...
1) The US was not defeated by the North Vietmanese on the battlefield, except for a few engagements spread over the 8 years of the war.
2) The US Army was a conscript army of mostly draftees. Junior officers were often right out of academy or given rank and quick training in OCS because they had a diploma or degree. Higher officers were often "cold" haviong no recent experience since Korea - a very different kind of war. That is precisely why the Green Berets were formed. Small groups of Special Forces destroyed enemy forces again and again. Occasionaly, theywere also destroyed, but it was rare.
3) Viet Cong and NVA were also drafted, but were defending their land. Many officers were veterans with deep experience against the French, and some were old enough to have fought the Japanese. All historians have a lot of respect for the North Vietnamese Army.
4) The US was defeated on it's own soil by college Communist students and Leftist Media, which was successful in turning politcal will against the war. The US bombing of North Vietnam was so successful and unstoppable that US Media focused attention on it more than anything else. The nightly News always reported casualties and showed the destruction in th eNorth. The American People are not war mongerers and turned against the War even more.
5) The North withdrew from the Paris Peace Talks. Nixon ordered a doubling of the bombing. It was at this time that Kissinger secretly told the North that Nixon was insane and wanted to obliterate all of North Vietnam - and that the US could do it within a year. The North believed it, and returned to the peace talks. IMPORTANT: At the same time, the US was puttig forth signals toChina that the US wished to "normalize" relations. This was horrifying to the both the North Vietnamese, and to Russia. This happened in 1974, and took China out of theSoviet spere of influence
6) The US was politically restrained in its conduct of the war. If the US had been fighting with all its abilities, there would be one big beach resort from the Chinese border all the way to the tip of South Vietnam, and the people of Vietnam would be as rich or richer than South Korea is today. Pol Pot would have never gained control of Cambodia, and the Chinese would not be threatening Vietnam and everyone else in the South China Sea dispute. The Philipines would still have a major US base there - which everyone agrees was the worst drawback of US forces in the world, given the rise of China now. All events from the US pullout of Vietnam have contributed to two things in Asia:
A) the rise of China, which threatens all countries where ever they go.
B) thus, forcing the resurgence of an armed and technically advanced Japan, with a new Nationalist agenda. Food for thought?
😅
what will happen in a real war. who knows
FYI, there's no defense for China's Hypersonic Glide Vehicle (HGV) missiles.
Actually there is, we just don't mention them usually. People forget the US can obliterate a Satellite going beyond Mach 10+ in space while the Patriot PAC-2 and PAC-3 missiles are designed to shoot down ballistic missiles going up to Mach fucking 20 and works effectively especially if said missile to heading towards the system.
China doesn't have "hypersonic" they have over glorified shaped ballistic missiles that needs a complex kill-chain that can be broken by literally just turning the steering wheel and changing direction. But analysts and military experts has to take what China say because they haven't actually demonstrated the ballistic missile can even do anything. Hell in the past couple of years, China been caught still trying to hit a moving train as target practice and still somehow fucking missed.
@@kerblingtime Pease give verifiable proof on "the US can obliterate a Satellite going beyond Mach 10+ in space." so we may learn also.
@itch4travel literally shot down 2 satellites on two different platforms with 2 different missiles on 2 different occasions. The F-15 shot down a satellite in a weapons test using an experimental/modified missile. A Arleigh Burke destroyer, the USS Lake Erie, with a modified SM-3 that took only weeks to made to shoot down a dead spy sat.
@@itch4travelumm, u do realize that satalites travel over 17,000 mph in orbit right? Us has destroyed more than a few ..in fact about 7. Does that explain it enough for you?😮
@@jimkluska253 Verifiable evidences please on "Us has destroyed more than a few."
NO EVIDENCE = KWENTONG BARBERO.
Scrap iron is coming 😅😅😅😅
Nice battleship games
3 weeks is long.
But very small when it comes to war and just imagine the size of China's Navy, the entire Navy got destroyed in 3 weeks, that is cracy
China will launch not dozens but hundreds of missiles and drones, if not thousands, against one single carrier group.
Every ship in the carrier group will get overwhelmed. There is no way any carrier group off the sea but near China at the start of the hostilities would survive.
China will lose in the end. But at the cost of entire carrier groups for the US, a lot of planes, and hundreds of thousands of troops for the US and its allies like Japan, the Philippines, Australia and others.
A modest simulation, assuming all the weapons and jets are that of doing such performances and a doubtful naval warfare operation.
in china, all weapons and jets are performing sub par.
@@theleavingroom Do they perform?
correction , 3 days
dapat bantayan natin Ang ating bansa,at wagtayo paloloko sa China
🇹🇼🇹🇼🇹🇼🇹🇼💪💪💪💪
My guess is it’s over in a week
Right!!!!!
Peace, please don't war
It's all about combat experience and technology. Nobody beats the USA and its Allies.
WOW
Doesn’t take 3 weeks both navies gone in 3 hrs after nuclear exchange end of planet
That's US alone..no japan .. South Korea... Philippines... Australia... Canada...France...India...Indonesia and Vietnam...
Chye Naa = Xit Jink Pink = Useless
❤❤❤❤👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏
감사합니다. 가미가제님. 두 군데 다 봐주시네요.^^
@@milsimk ur welcome❤️🤗🇵🇭
No way 30 minutes ie too much
I say less than 24 hours Navy will be gone
All the US need to do is try
2024 = WW3
I hope that doesn't happen. 🙏
No doubt
@@milsimkare you sure about that
Lolol the final news broadcasts of the CCP state media hahaha...
Modern war ship
no. It's not
I think its true coz our alliance country will join and China now is collapsing...
8 weeks if it's just Taiwan and Japan vs the PLA navy.
😅😅😅😅😅