Christianity vs. Dispensationalsim. 1. Jesus Christ repeatedly said that he was mentioned in the Scriptures: "Do not think that I will accuse you before the Father. Your accuser is Moses, in whom you have put your hope. If you had believed Moses, you would believe Me, because he wrote about Me. But since you do not believe what he wrote, how will you believe what I say?" John 5:45-47. "Then Jesus took the Twelve aside and said to them, "Look, we are going up to Jerusalem, and everything the prophets have written about the Son of Man will be fulfilled." Luke 19:31. "For I tell you that this Scripture must be fulfilled in Me: 'And He was numbered with the transgressors.' For what is written about Me is reaching its fulfillment." Luke 22:37. 2. God fulfilled ALL of his promises to Israel: "Thus the LORD gave Israel all the land He had sworn to give their fathers, and they took possession of it and settled in it. And the LORD gave them rest on every side, just as He had sworn to their fathers. None of their enemies could stand against them, for the LORD delivered all their enemies into their hand. Not one of all the LORD’s good promises to the house of Israel had failed; everything was fulfilled." Joshua 21:43-45. 3. The Promise of Land had conditions: "If, however, you fail to obey Me and to carry out all these commandments, and if you reject My statutes, despise My ordinances, and neglect to carry out all My commandments, and so break My covenant, 16then this is what I will do to you: I will bring upon you sudden terror, wasting disease, and fever that will destroy your sight and drain your life. You will sow your seed in vain, because your enemies will eat it." Leviticus 26:14-16. 4. God foresaw that Israel would BREAK the Covenant: "Behold, days are coming," declares the LORD, "when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, not like the covenant which I made with their fathers in the day I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, My covenant which they broke, although I was a husband to them," declares the LORD. "But this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel after those days," declares the LORD, "I will put My law within them and on their heart I will write it; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people." Jeremiah 31:31-33. 5. God created a New Covenant: "In the same way, after supper He took the cup, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is poured out for you." Luke 22:20. "In speaking of a new covenant, He has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear." Hebrews 8:13. "Therefore I tell you that the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people who will produce its fruit." Matthew 21:43. 6. God then destroyed Israel: "For the days will come upon you when your enemies will barricade you and surround you and hem you in on every side. They will level you to the ground - you and the children within your walls. They will not leave one stone on another, because you did not recognize the time of your visitation from God.” Luke 19:43-44. “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, who kills the prophets and stones those sent to her, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were unwilling! Look, your house is left to you desolate. For I tell you that you will not see Me again until you say, ‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord.’” Matthew 23:37-39. 7. AND the Old Covenant is NO MORE: "In speaking of a new covenant, He has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear." Hebrews 8:13. "Therefore Christ is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance, now that He has died to redeem them from the transgressions committed under the first covenant." Hebrews 9:15.
Joshua 21:34-45 is talking about God’s promise to ISREAL however you need to investigate where did this promise come from? God’s covenant with Isreal is derived from God’s promise to ABRAHAM. Gods promise to Abraham had not been totally fulfilled see Genesis 12 ( “and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you”). This part of the promise was only fulfilled through Christ. Then if you read Hebrews 11 you will learn that Gods way of saving people had always been by grace through faith, no one was ever made righteous by their works. Why is Abraham called the father of faith if his works saved him. Christ came to fulfil the old covenants plural because it’s not just one old covenant - how - see adamic covenant ( Gods curse to Eve) see Abrahamic covenant (Gen 12) so there is no saving by works that NONE should boast.
Note that you didn't answer his question regarding the history of dispensationalism or the critique that it started in the 19th century (which is true). Also, you have a section listed as the history of dispensationalism yet no history is given. You make it sound like dispensationalism simply means God is still fulfilling his promises to Israel. Many have believed this for the past 2000 years. Dispensationalism on the other hand, has existed for 200 years. Thus you not only failed to answer the question, but vastly over-simplified dispensationalism (despite taking 18 minutes to do so).
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, modern Dispensational Theology falls apart, and the pretrib removal of the Church falls with it. Watch the TH-cam videos "The New Covenant" by Bob George, and "New Covenant Theology Made Simple" by David H. J. Gay.
The answer to this question is a poorly constructed straw-man argument. Perhaps the most ridiculous assertion is to say that Daniel was a dispensationalist. No scholar anywhere at anytime in the history of Christianity would dare say something so ridiculous.
I believe in both Covenant theology and dispensationalism. I know that statement may seem strange to a lot of people, but the Book of Revelation says that there will be a new heaven and a new earth. It says that a new Jerusalem will be coming down from the sky onto the earth. As amazing as that is, I can see the saved Jew being more excited about that than us Christians. I believe that the New Earth is for the Messianic Jews and that the New Heaven is for us Gentile Christians that are written in the Lamb's Book of Life. Either you call him Jesus or Yeshua. It doesn't matter. The New Heaven & The New Earth will be equally as amazing. I don't get the same rush as Jews get when they speak about Jerusalem, Just like they don't get the sam rush as Catholics get when they talk about the Vatican. I'm a Protestant ( Wesleyan) and this my belief. Jews who have accepted the Lord Jesus Christ as their saviour will inherit the Kingdom of God on earth and Christians will inherit the Kingdom of God in heaven. Both places and awesome and our words can't do them justice. Thank you and God bless you in the precious blood and Holy name of our Lord Jesus Christ!!
Sadly, dispensationalism neglects Scriptures about the engrafting and the one new man in Christ, if you disagree, ask yourself this, when was the last time you heard a sermon about this exact thing? This neglect overlooks the basic fact the New Testament covers the Gentile and Jewish world being introduced to the Jewish Messiah. The prophecies and words of the apostles about the inclusion of the Gentile into the promises of the Jewish people through Christ, is an important key to the salvation of humanity, and coming into the new heaven and new earth, which is also negated in today's dispensational worldview.
Pick up a copy of clarence larkins 'Dispensational Truth'....the way you speak it almost seems you are describing covenant theology which is basically polemic to dispensation schools. The Jewish people refuse to see the Messiah until they have gone through the melting pot that's the great tribulation, becoming the 144,ooo. (Isaiah 6:10)
@@dennisking4589 Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ? (Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30) The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations? 1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? 2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ? 3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds? 4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh? 5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers? 6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"? 7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost? 8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.) 9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) 10. Watch the TH-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church. Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology. Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.” Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107. Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.” Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323. John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated… "...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.” John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.) What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16? Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth? Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups? Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and Hebrews 8:6-13? Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church?
@@SpotterVideo We are not the nation of Israel. We are grafted into the family, adopted and sons of thee promises, all spiritual, of Abraham. Israel will inherit physical blessings as a nation. It is that simple. Also, Irenaeus seemed to think so.
@@dennisking4589 Who was Peter talking to on the Day of Pentecost when he addressed the crowd as "all the house of Israel" in Acts 2:36, and about 3,000 Israelites came to faith? Who was Paul talking to in Romans 11:1-5, when he described two different groups of Israelites? Who is the "remnant" in verse 5? Who was James talking to in James 1:1-3, when he addressed his letter to "the twelve tribes", who were his "brethren" in the "faith"? If you think a whole nation is going to be saved, read the verse below. Rom 9:27 Isaiah also cries out concerning Israel: "THOUGH THE NUMBER OF THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL BE AS THE SAND OF THE SEA, THE REMNANT WILL BE SAVED. Paul provides no path to salvation outside of the Church in Romans 11:1-28. There is no Plan B of salvation, based on race. See the word "genealogies" in Titus 3:9.
@@SpotterVideo He was addressing people of Israel, who became Christians, and DID NOT receive any of the physical promises....in fact, Jerusalem was destroyed not long after...
John Darby believed in infant baptism. He called it household baptism. The Exclusive Brethren practice infant baptism. The Open Brethren practice believer's baptism.
WOW. It's almost breathtaking how arrogantly you have constructed a grotesque strawman of what covenant theology is and how non dispensationalists interpret the Bible. If you are going to make your case effectively, you give a fair presentation of the other side. However, if your side is weak, you have to build a paper dragon to slay.
You make a logical fallacy by asserting that one's position must be weak in order to present a strawman of the opposing view. That being said, I agree that video does present a strawman! 🤣
The translation of the word Church only means: cogregation. The Church is not an ad hoc solution that Jesus to get his people. Gods plan still stands. The church is Isreal (Spiritual Isreal). No replacement theology at all, dispensationalism IS. There is no scriptures in the old testament that talks about plan B. Or ever mentions a Church!!
Daniel fights against dispensationalism sooooo much more than it could ever be construed out of context to agree with dispensationalism. You’re falsely representing the other side of the topic to justify a Jesuit lie
WHERE does the Bible say what you just said? It never does. So did God forget to tell us something we need to know? Dispensationalists are antichrists. They openly, brazenly discount and ignore the teaching of the LORD Jesus they claim to be serving. They teach that the 4 Gospels do not apply to New Testament believer. They don't want to deal with the hard truths of the Son of God and so now they deify His apostle, that is Paul, you know the one who said he's "less than the least of all saints." (Ephesians 3:8) And, they also dismiss the teachings of Christ's apostles Peter and John. Beware saints. This dispensationalism cult is spreading it's evil leaven. WHO Decided that large portions of the New Testament canon don't apply to Christians?- HINT: It wasn't God because He ordained those books to be there for a reason and expects them to apply to us! do you see the indictment here? Dispensationalists are 100% OSAS/eternal security heretics and so they got tired of having to explain around the book of Hebrews and the things Jesus says in the Gospels so they created a way to get rid of them. They teach that those New Testament books do not apply to New Testament believers. In other words, they indict God Himself for including books in His New Testament canon that should not be there. By saying any New Testament book doesn't apply to New Testament believers what they are doing is taking away from the Word of God and the LORD is removing their names from His book of life! (Revelation 22:18-19) Run from these devils!
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ? (Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30) The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations? 1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? 2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ? 3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds? 4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh? 5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers? 6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"? 7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost? 8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.) 9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) 10. Watch the TH-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church. Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology. Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.” Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107. Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.” Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323. John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated… "...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.” John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.) What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16? Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth? Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups? Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and Hebrews 8:6-13? Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church?
@@SafeGuardYourSoul question: 1 what doctrines do you beleive in? Are you a calvinist? What is the right doctrine and why. Thank you. I'm just curious btw
Christianity vs. Dispensationalsim.
1. Jesus Christ repeatedly said that he was mentioned in the Scriptures:
"Do not think that I will accuse you before the Father. Your accuser is Moses, in whom you have put your hope. If you had believed Moses, you would believe Me, because he wrote about Me. But since you do not believe what he wrote, how will you believe what I say?" John 5:45-47.
"Then Jesus took the Twelve aside and said to them, "Look, we are going up to Jerusalem, and everything the prophets have written about the Son of Man will be fulfilled." Luke 19:31.
"For I tell you that this Scripture must be fulfilled in Me: 'And He was numbered with the transgressors.' For what is written about Me is reaching its fulfillment." Luke 22:37.
2. God fulfilled ALL of his promises to Israel:
"Thus the LORD gave Israel all the land He had sworn to give their fathers, and they took possession of it and settled in it. And the LORD gave them rest on every side, just as He had sworn to their fathers. None of their enemies could stand against them, for the LORD delivered all their enemies into their hand. Not one of all the LORD’s good promises to the house of Israel had failed; everything was fulfilled." Joshua 21:43-45.
3. The Promise of Land had conditions:
"If, however, you fail to obey Me and to carry out all these commandments, and if you reject My statutes, despise My ordinances, and neglect to carry out all My commandments, and so break My covenant, 16then this is what I will do to you: I will bring upon you sudden terror, wasting disease, and fever that will destroy your sight and drain your life. You will sow your seed in vain, because your enemies will eat it." Leviticus 26:14-16.
4. God foresaw that Israel would BREAK the Covenant:
"Behold, days are coming," declares the LORD, "when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, not like the covenant which I made with their fathers in the day I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, My covenant which they broke, although I was a husband to them," declares the LORD. "But this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel after those days," declares the LORD, "I will put My law within them and on their heart I will write it; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people." Jeremiah 31:31-33.
5. God created a New Covenant:
"In the same way, after supper He took the cup, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is poured out for you." Luke 22:20.
"In speaking of a new covenant, He has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear." Hebrews 8:13.
"Therefore I tell you that the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people who will produce its fruit." Matthew 21:43.
6. God then destroyed Israel:
"For the days will come upon you when your enemies will barricade you and surround you and hem you in on every side. They will level you to the ground - you and the children within your walls. They will not leave one stone on another, because you did not recognize the time of your visitation from God.” Luke 19:43-44.
“O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, who kills the prophets and stones those sent to her, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were unwilling! Look, your house is left to you desolate. For I tell you that you will not see Me again until you say, ‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord.’” Matthew 23:37-39.
7. AND the Old Covenant is NO MORE:
"In speaking of a new covenant, He has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear." Hebrews 8:13.
"Therefore Christ is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance, now that He has died to redeem them from the transgressions committed under the first covenant." Hebrews 9:15.
Joshua 21:34-45 is talking about God’s promise to ISREAL however you need to investigate where did this promise come from? God’s covenant with Isreal is derived from God’s promise to ABRAHAM. Gods promise to Abraham had not been totally fulfilled see Genesis 12 ( “and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you”). This part of the promise was only fulfilled through Christ. Then if you read Hebrews 11 you will learn that Gods way of saving people had always been by grace through faith, no one was ever made righteous by their works. Why is Abraham called the father of faith if his works saved him. Christ came to fulfil the old covenants plural because it’s not just one old covenant - how - see adamic covenant ( Gods curse to Eve) see Abrahamic covenant (Gen 12) so there is no saving by works that NONE should boast.
Note that you didn't answer his question regarding the history of dispensationalism or the critique that it started in the 19th century (which is true). Also, you have a section listed as the history of dispensationalism yet no history is given. You make it sound like dispensationalism simply means God is still fulfilling his promises to Israel. Many have believed this for the past 2000 years. Dispensationalism on the other hand, has existed for 200 years. Thus you not only failed to answer the question, but vastly over-simplified dispensationalism (despite taking 18 minutes to do so).
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised
to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ
during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and
specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews
12:22-24, modern Dispensational Theology falls apart, and the pretrib removal
of the Church falls with it.
Watch the TH-cam videos "The New Covenant" by Bob George, and "New Covenant Theology Made Simple" by David H. J. Gay.
Bob George is a calivnist heretic of the worst kind. Total wolf.
@@SafeGuardYourSoul If you are going to make an accusation, at least provide some evidence.
The answer to this question is a poorly constructed straw-man argument. Perhaps the most ridiculous assertion is to say that Daniel was a dispensationalist. No scholar anywhere at anytime in the history of Christianity would dare say something so ridiculous.
I believe in both Covenant theology and dispensationalism. I know that statement may seem strange to a lot of people, but the Book of Revelation says that there will be a new heaven and a new earth. It says that a new Jerusalem will be coming down from the sky onto the earth. As amazing as that is, I can see the saved Jew being more excited about that than us Christians. I believe that the New Earth is for the Messianic Jews and that the New Heaven is for us Gentile Christians that are written in the Lamb's Book of Life. Either you call him Jesus or Yeshua. It doesn't matter. The New Heaven & The New Earth will be equally as amazing. I don't get the same rush as Jews get when they speak about Jerusalem, Just like they don't get the sam rush as Catholics get when they talk about the Vatican. I'm a Protestant ( Wesleyan) and this my belief. Jews who have accepted the Lord Jesus Christ as their saviour will inherit the Kingdom of God on earth and Christians will inherit the Kingdom of God in heaven. Both places and awesome and our words can't do them justice. Thank you and God bless you in the precious blood and Holy name of our Lord Jesus Christ!!
So how did you come to that conclusion? How exactly can they be compatible? Any books on that?
Sadly, dispensationalism neglects Scriptures about the engrafting and the one new man in Christ, if you disagree, ask yourself this, when was the last time you heard a sermon about this exact thing? This neglect overlooks the basic fact the New Testament covers the Gentile and Jewish world being introduced to the Jewish Messiah. The prophecies and words of the apostles about the inclusion of the Gentile into the promises of the Jewish people through Christ, is an important key to the salvation of humanity, and coming into the new heaven and new earth, which is also negated in today's dispensational worldview.
Pick up a copy of clarence larkins 'Dispensational Truth'....the way you speak it almost seems you are describing covenant theology which is basically polemic to dispensation schools. The Jewish people refuse to see the Messiah until they have gone through the melting pot that's the great tribulation, becoming the 144,ooo. (Isaiah 6:10)
@@dennisking4589 Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ?
(Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30)
The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations?
1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants?
2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ?
3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds?
4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh?
5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers?
6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"?
7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost?
8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.)
9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9)
10. Watch the TH-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church.
Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology.
Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107.
Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323.
John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated…
"...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.”
John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.)
What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16?
Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth?
Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups?
Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and Hebrews 8:6-13?
Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church?
@@SpotterVideo We are not the nation of Israel.
We are grafted into the family, adopted and sons of thee promises, all spiritual, of Abraham.
Israel will inherit physical blessings as a nation.
It is that simple.
Also, Irenaeus seemed to think so.
@@dennisking4589 Who was Peter talking to on the Day of Pentecost when he addressed the crowd as "all the house of Israel" in Acts 2:36, and about 3,000 Israelites came to faith?
Who was Paul talking to in Romans 11:1-5, when he described two different groups of Israelites? Who is the "remnant" in verse 5?
Who was James talking to in James 1:1-3, when he addressed his letter to "the twelve tribes", who were his "brethren" in the "faith"?
If you think a whole nation is going to be saved, read the verse below.
Rom 9:27 Isaiah also cries out concerning Israel: "THOUGH THE NUMBER OF THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL BE AS THE SAND OF THE SEA, THE REMNANT WILL BE SAVED.
Paul provides no path to salvation outside of the Church in Romans 11:1-28. There is no Plan B of salvation, based on race. See the word "genealogies" in Titus 3:9.
@@SpotterVideo He was addressing people of Israel, who became Christians, and DID NOT receive any of the physical promises....in fact, Jerusalem was destroyed not long after...
John Darby believed in infant baptism. He called it household baptism. The Exclusive Brethren practice infant baptism. The Open Brethren practice believer's baptism.
He also omitted and changed words in his Darby bible. Look it up on Bible gateway. I just did a video on him.Go to my channel and check it out.
WOW. It's almost breathtaking how arrogantly you have constructed a grotesque strawman of what covenant theology is and how non dispensationalists interpret the Bible. If you are going to make your case effectively, you give a fair presentation of the other side. However, if your side is weak, you have to build a paper dragon to slay.
Exactly!
Explain
You make a logical fallacy by asserting that one's position must be weak in order to present a strawman of the opposing view. That being said, I agree that video does present a strawman! 🤣
Does this guy ever sound like Tim Keller!
Ephesians 3...
The translation of the word Church only means: cogregation.
The Church is not an ad hoc solution that Jesus to get his people. Gods plan still stands.
The church is Isreal (Spiritual Isreal).
No replacement theology at all, dispensationalism IS.
There is no scriptures in the old testament that talks about plan B.
Or ever mentions a Church!!
I guess God wanted Adam to disobey him
Daniel fights against dispensationalism sooooo much more than it could ever be construed out of context to agree with dispensationalism. You’re falsely representing the other side of the topic to justify a Jesuit lie
Dispensational is the only way to approach God's word.
WHERE does the Bible say what you just said? It never does. So did God forget to tell us something we need to know?
Dispensationalists are antichrists. They openly, brazenly discount and ignore the teaching of the LORD Jesus they claim to be serving. They teach that the 4 Gospels do not apply to New Testament believer. They don't want to deal with the hard truths of the Son of God and so now they deify His apostle, that is Paul, you know the one who said he's "less than the least of all saints." (Ephesians 3:8) And, they also dismiss the teachings of Christ's apostles Peter and John. Beware saints. This dispensationalism cult is spreading it's evil leaven.
WHO Decided that large portions of the New Testament canon don't apply to Christians?- HINT: It wasn't God because He ordained those books to be there for a reason and expects them to apply to us! do you see the indictment here? Dispensationalists are 100% OSAS/eternal security heretics and so they got tired of having to explain around the book of Hebrews and the things Jesus says in the Gospels so they created a way to get rid of them. They teach that those New Testament books do not apply to New Testament believers. In other words, they indict God Himself for including books in His New Testament canon that should not be there. By saying any New Testament book doesn't apply to New Testament believers what they are doing is taking away from the Word of God and the LORD is removing their names from His book of life! (Revelation 22:18-19) Run from these devils!
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ?
(Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30)
The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations?
1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants?
2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ?
3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds?
4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh?
5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers?
6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"?
7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost?
8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.)
9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9)
10. Watch the TH-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church.
Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology.
Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107.
Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323.
John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated…
"...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.”
John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.)
What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16?
Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth?
Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups?
Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and Hebrews 8:6-13?
Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church?
@@SafeGuardYourSoul question: 1 what doctrines do you beleive in? Are you a calvinist? What is the right doctrine and why. Thank you. I'm just curious btw
Dispensationalism is a false made up they reject the teaching of Jesus when paul confirms the teachings
LOL CT is flawed from the beginning. Jesus was/ is/ and will always be a Jew. they need to get over themselves.
Thank you for your gracious attitude
ah...take a speaking...ah....class...ah