a very small sample of problems ignored and ships requiring updates and fixes (some have been waiting for a decade), but your intent is admirable. you could probably make an ongoing series about forgotten ships and their problems. it's shameful how CIG would rather make new (and problematic) ships to sell to players rather than making existing ships players already own into enjoyable game assets...
Well, their supposed to be MEN........with a pair of balls, instead of wimpering generational girls. Its a game we all love, but just a game for fecks sake.
@@Billy-bc8pk better use of resources would save money, create more goodwill, and give CIG a better idea of keeping SC unique rather than forcing it to be a fancy copy of EVE Online; but i suppose that would not set well with people distracted by the next sparkly new ship...
They can't have physical shields because they "magically" took away the S3 shield and they can't fit SIX Size 2's in that space. It just doesn't fit. They didn't (as usual) think it through.
Becoming my go to channel for all things SC, all other channels just run through patch notes and then talk about them. I really like the way you actually go and Test the stuff in the notes, it must take ages bringing it all together, and the amount of ships/items that need testing. Hats off and please keep this format going. o7
Had my first Hauling mission in the RAFT. Loving it as always but the fuel nerf hit the poor thing hard >< I fell through the ladder while in motion, so I guess CIG did fuckall about the interior glitching while in flight as well... Sadness, awesome video tho as always :D
Damn, dude! Thank you for making a video about this and bringing it to more (and hopefully CiG's...) attention as to how severe some of these issues are!
Missed the Starlancer MAX missing its MFD's. Also its spotlights. Also its still slower than larger, more massive ships for seemingly no obvious reason.
Also a small issue with the starlancer is the door panel from engineering to habs, is aligned wrong, i noted it before it's full release and it wasn't fixed.
I just don't understand how so much can break while they work on something entirely different. There just seems to be some sort of crosscutting dependency across everything that makes it nearly impossible for a human mind to comprehend the indirection. As an engineer, this really smells.
All is done in a huge graphical interfaces where each boxes contain many parameters and references to others assets. All is filled and created mostly manually. Just forgetting a tick or giving a wrong asset or value to something will elad to a bug.
Ive heard its SPITE, some devs were seen to comment ''those whiney ass ingrates can feck off'', there's a lot of hate toward backers, even CR was said to give the ''Wankers'' hand signal when reading the backers winges. Its also rumoured that the 4.0 lIVE patch is going to be an 3 week old build?..........Spite!
890 Jump also still has visarea issue with the cargo elevator when not close to it. You can see it render broken if not close like you were here in the video. Rear middle PDC on back of the 890J is also placed the wrong direction by default.
Additional bug for you Foxy for the Retaliator. With someone in the pilot seat, anyone using the turrets has offset firing - weapons do not shoot down the crosshair.
What is strange is the lack of consistency. They seemed to have solved this issue but a few ships/vehicle still have it. Maybe it is not s systemic solution but an individual tweeking to be done ship per ship.
I can't find it on the issue council as a bug report atm, I'm sure I've contributed to a report about it before though,. I might just be searching for it the wrong way Edit: Well I do find one marked as "fixed", and a newer one didn't get enough reports so got archieved
The 890 too hangar door turns black when you land on it. Also, can you please test PDCs? The bug where they won’t target things until you leave your seat is frustrating.
🥳🎉 Hey CptFoxyLoxy! I love your videos. Very informative and entertaining! So, that bug you had were the ship continues at the same speed along the same vector, I have had the same issue. It seems to be tied to applying the space brake and using third-person cameras. Tapping F4 two times solves the problem quickly. Don't you love these "features?" ✌️
The problem with the Santokyay is the same gimbal lock issue the Khartual has had for years. You can toggle vtol on and off to fix it when the engines get stuck.
They still haven’t fixed the Polaris hangar with ships falling out of it in quantum. Seems to be an issue when you go across a shard because of server meshing. When you go through a shard, your vehicle falls out of your hangar.
Also Pisces C8X has bug that some of the skins/liveries do not work. Also Origin 100-series has problems with high FOV settings with MFD warning lights. I bet there is a ton more problems that just does not get noticed
Love your video, mate! Thank you for highlighting the bug issues-it helps keep us and the devs informed. Please do share any more bugs you come across in your future videos. Great work! 🫡
This is exactly the type of bug where serious programmer would write an automated script for verifying the settings of all components of all ships for each version.
Do ships still fall out of other ships hangars? Examle Polaris carrying a Vulture the vulture falls out when changing server mesh. Wasnt the Retaliator a gold pass.....
did they fix lockon actually locking on for missiles for all ships older than a year? and increase range from 5k to the nose, to 10-15k for s1-2 missiles....
The starfarer worked before. You didn’t read the comments from last video. The person never paid the crazy high price you set, and wouldn’t let it flow till you were paid
No it didn't, that's a UI bug on the gantry terminal. Before this patch, the nozzle was completely missing from the VLM and the fuel would never flow. Even if the docked ship doesn't pay, you can still manually open the nozzle and transfer fuel. You can also just vent fuel into space.
foxy please mention that the retaliator turrets are all broken! and u cant aim or target, its been like this for a couple patches, and it hasn't gotten enough votes in issue counsel, please u are the last hope!
Speaking of the redumber.... How the FK are you supposed to get components up and down the FKN LADDER. It is such a disappointing ship especially because of the nerf but not just that, the horrible scrambled egg design. Not only that, the ship loadout menu UI is still a FKN JOKE. IM PISSED! =)
The tali has every bug of every ship has lol just fix the poor thing, also anyone know where to buy the cargo modules? I searched in orison and couldn't find them
![Official Alpha 4.0 "PATCH WATCH" | Insurance Fraud Addressed & Ultra Rare Mining Material Added [4k]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nA_liRKyW0g/mqdefault.jpg)
The guy who never sleeps. Thanks for your testing and information.
a very small sample of problems ignored and ships requiring updates and fixes (some have been waiting for a decade), but your intent is admirable. you could probably make an ongoing series about forgotten ships and their problems. it's shameful how CIG would rather make new (and problematic) ships to sell to players rather than making existing ships players already own into enjoyable game assets...
Well, their supposed to be MEN........with a pair of balls, instead of wimpering generational girls. Its a game we all love, but just a game for fecks sake.
New ships sell better is my guess.
As 4tonmike said, new ships definitely sell better and helps keep the revenue flowing in to pay the people who make the game.
@@Billy-bc8pk better use of resources would save money, create more goodwill, and give CIG a better idea of keeping SC unique rather than forcing it to be a fancy copy of EVE Online; but i suppose that would not set well with people distracted by the next sparkly new ship...
@@4tonmike a better, more unique game that works at all levels would sell even better...
They can't have physical shields because they "magically" took away the S3 shield and they can't fit SIX Size 2's in that space. It just doesn't fit. They didn't (as usual) think it through.
Also the 6 shields takes way to many power points rendering the ship useless
They should change it back to what they promised it to be when first selling it.
How do you even replace those shields if the only access point is a ladder?
I wish they would fix the mobiglas display of your ship in the editor display. That fuzzy blob is annoying.
You are a gift to the community and to C.I.G 💯
Mate the Phoenix hot tub works, as far as i am concerned the game is complete and finished.
ty for the giggle
Yeah.....but you dont have your Speedo's?
They should make it heal you slowly or something. Magical rich person water, made of the tears of orphans or something
Becoming my go to channel for all things SC, all other channels just run through patch notes and then talk about them. I really like the way you actually go and Test the stuff in the notes, it must take ages bringing it all together, and the amount of ships/items that need testing. Hats off and please keep this format going. o7
Had my first Hauling mission in the RAFT. Loving it as always but the fuel nerf hit the poor thing hard >< I fell through the ladder while in motion, so I guess CIG did fuckall about the interior glitching while in flight as well... Sadness, awesome video tho as always :D
I guess the Anvil Hawk is the Anvil Flamingo for now.
The Ursa medivac jumps around also
Damn, dude! Thank you for making a video about this and bringing it to more (and hopefully CiG's...) attention as to how severe some of these issues are!
Fantastic test! Starfarer being fixed for 4.0 was absolutely crutial and it's good that they managed to get it sorted.
Missed the Starlancer MAX missing its MFD's. Also its spotlights. Also its still slower than larger, more massive ships for seemingly no obvious reason.
Also a small issue with the starlancer is the door panel from engineering to habs, is aligned wrong, i noted it before it's full release and it wasn't fixed.
And we should be allowed to open the minifridges in the hab quarters! :D
I just don't understand how so much can break while they work on something entirely different. There just seems to be some sort of crosscutting dependency across everything that makes it nearly impossible for a human mind to comprehend the indirection. As an engineer, this really smells.
Agreed, some bad design somewhere under the covers
All is done in a huge graphical interfaces where each boxes contain many parameters and references to others assets. All is filled and created mostly manually. Just forgetting a tick or giving a wrong asset or value to something will elad to a bug.
Ive heard its SPITE, some devs were seen to comment ''those whiney ass ingrates can feck off'', there's a lot of hate toward backers, even CR was said to give the ''Wankers'' hand signal when reading the backers winges. Its also rumoured that the 4.0 lIVE patch is going to be an 3 week old build?..........Spite!
re the Hawk, try setting off the EMP in your hangar. Just be sure you are up for a trip to Klescher!
I did that in the raven, and got quite a few crime stats
890 Jump also still has visarea issue with the cargo elevator when not close to it. You can see it render broken if not close like you were here in the video.
Rear middle PDC on back of the 890J is also placed the wrong direction by default.
Appreciate all your content most valuable citizen
Additional bug for you Foxy for the Retaliator. With someone in the pilot seat, anyone using the turrets has offset firing - weapons do not shoot down the crosshair.
They need another team to maintain and fix released ships.
The nursa is 'happy,' too.
Ursa's have always been happy, pogo buggy lol.
What is strange is the lack of consistency. They seemed to have solved this issue but a few ships/vehicle still have it. Maybe it is not s systemic solution but an individual tweeking to be done ship per ship.
classic star citizen, fixes 1 thing breaks 10.
Got rekt trying to land the San’tok’yai during alien week, I didn’t know it was a known bug lol
Lol, SC translation for known bug, it's known to the community, but seemingly ignored by CIG :)
I can't find it on the issue council as a bug report atm, I'm sure I've contributed to a report about it before though,. I might just be searching for it the wrong way
Edit: Well I do find one marked as "fixed", and a newer one didn't get enough reports so got archieved
The 890 too hangar door turns black when you land on it.
Also, can you please test PDCs? The bug where they won’t target things until you leave your seat is frustrating.
Yeah, I have been experiencing the similar problems with the PDC more than often in the 4.0 it is frustrating.
🥳🎉 Hey CptFoxyLoxy! I love your videos. Very informative and entertaining!
So, that bug you had were the ship continues at the same speed along the same vector, I have had the same issue. It seems to be tied to applying the space brake and using third-person cameras.
Tapping F4 two times solves the problem quickly. Don't you love these "features?" ✌️
"Bugs" on the Hornet...right before selling the Guardian. What a shocking turn of events.
Thanks for all of your work and testing. 🥰
The problem with the Santokyay is the same gimbal lock issue the Khartual has had for years. You can toggle vtol on and off to fix it when the engines get stuck.
Do you know if we can buy a ball turret from weapon shops to add guns to the F7C again now? Or does it have to be one from the F7A?
It’s not Working i tried.
:( thanks
They still haven’t fixed the Polaris hangar with ships falling out of it in quantum. Seems to be an issue when you go across a shard because of server meshing. When you go through a shard, your vehicle falls out of your hangar.
Loooool
Great content, friend. You’ve won me over.
The Reclaimer`s elevator works now...... The Hercules landing gear, (that was fixed some patches ago), got spoiled once again.....
Also Pisces C8X has bug that some of the skins/liveries do not work. Also Origin 100-series has problems with high FOV settings with MFD warning lights. I bet there is a ton more problems that just does not get noticed
Love your video, mate! Thank you for highlighting the bug issues-it helps keep us and the devs informed. Please do share any more bugs you come across in your future videos. Great work! 🫡
This will be fun to squeeze Redeemer's shield generator and other stuff through the ladder area
Was just thinking the same.
Not sure if it's been fixed, but also the 100i is very happy too, constantly hitting the landing pad.
The component snapping problem ( 2:29 ) also exists in the Vulture as of 16 December 2024. Remove? Yes. Reinstall? Nope.
This is exactly the type of bug where serious programmer would write an automated script for verifying the settings of all components of all ships for each version.
It's a mess.....
Wish they fixed the Reclaimer issues! side elevator / toggle remote turrets / target ability with turrets
I guess my modules on the Retaliator were equipped pre-bug so I never had the issue.
You should check the polaris pdc there is something to why it doesnt shoot npc enemy's but works perfect on the 890 jump
Hydrogen evaporated, so maybe that's why you don't see spillage
I wonder how can we take the components out of the Redeemer
is the A1 copilot turret fixed ? it just showed as the tractor beam from the C1 but has the guns mounted 😅
Do ships still fall out of other ships hangars? Examle Polaris carrying a Vulture the vulture falls out when changing server mesh. Wasnt the Retaliator a gold pass.....
did they fix lockon actually locking on for missiles for all ships older than a year? and increase range from 5k to the nose, to 10-15k for s1-2 missiles....
Fixing that table took forever.
Hi, How do you have time for all this amazing videos?
890J are dual S4 weapons, not S5 :)
last time i looked bedlogging in the star farer didnt work
no mole?
I believe 890 had size 5 turret with 2x 4 find
Can you see if the new zeus mkii mfds are still black??
Where did the double bed come from?
CitizenCon 2954 Digital Goodies Pack. It is still available on the website but will probably be removed soon.
@ Thanks. I guess I have a few. I just haven’t looked through my in game inventory
Foxyloxy is pure gold 🤩
I’m always for non combat or combat-adjacent gameplay options
REDEEMER NEEDS TO GO BACK TO 1 SIZE 3 SHEILD MINIMUM
You're the man!
The starfarer worked before. You didn’t read the comments from last video. The person never paid the crazy high price you set, and wouldn’t let it flow till you were paid
No it didn't, that's a UI bug on the gantry terminal. Before this patch, the nozzle was completely missing from the VLM and the fuel would never flow. Even if the docked ship doesn't pay, you can still manually open the nozzle and transfer fuel. You can also just vent fuel into space.
can the starfarer refuel itself ?
foxy please mention that the retaliator turrets are all broken! and u cant aim or target, its been like this for a couple patches, and it hasn't gotten enough votes in issue counsel, please u are the last hope!
C1 the tractor beam is broken :/
Fixed until 4.0.x
Speaking of the redumber.... How the FK are you supposed to get components up and down the FKN LADDER. It is such a disappointing ship especially because of the nerf but not just that, the horrible scrambled egg design.
Not only that, the ship loadout menu UI is still a FKN JOKE.
IM PISSED! =)
The tali has every bug of every ship has lol just fix the poor thing, also anyone know where to buy the cargo modules? I searched in orison and couldn't find them
Omega Pro/NewBabbage.
New Babbage has the cargo modules
You could have googled it faster than typing the question
@@thesheep3077 I thought it wasn't accurate since I found the modules in orison couple patches ago and now its not there
Is it *actually* fixed though?
Duct taped only as usual :D
I like turtles
Aaaaaaaaannnd it's broken
First and proud to be here
Thank you, the honor is mine.