Self-edits: 1965, I missed Tony Perez and Catfish Hunter. 1964 I missed Dick Allen. Still, no change in my RC ranking; I have '61 just ahead of '65 in RCs and here's where market/fan-base size may factor in (SF, Chicago vs. Cincy, KC/Oak). And, of course, Rose's RC is way bigger than Bench's RC. I also misspoke 2nd and 3rd overall at the end. Wow, some whoppers for sure!
Great rundown John! 1964 and 1967 are my favorites. However '66, '65 and '69 have moved up on my list. I like the simple designs with the team name across the top or bottom of the cards. I like the backs of '63 and '68. I like yellow on my cards, lol. To be honest, I'm not as much of a fan of 1962 anymore. They're nice but I like the All-Star cards better than the base.
Beautiful cards. The 1967 set is nice,that's the year I started collecting cards. I got more serious in 1968 and almost collected the whole set. They did a good job on the pitchers' portraits I feel. Nice video!
My grading- 65, 67, 63, 68, 62. Thanks for the video. Really love the seventies sets though, particularly the 72 and 75 sets. They were very colorful and really reflected that era. On a negative but hopefully helpful suggestion: try to work on eliminating your uhm’s. Most people struggle with that. Thanks again!
Again, it speaks to that legacy piece. I guess you could say it's an iconic set in that way. The most iconic sets of the '60s (or any decade) could be a cool take on rankings. For that descriptor, I'd add 1960 with '65 and '63 in the top three because of that unique design. Thanks for watching!
Self-edits: 1965, I missed Tony Perez and Catfish Hunter. 1964 I missed Dick Allen. Still, no change in my RC ranking; I have '61 just ahead of '65 in RCs and here's where market/fan-base size may factor in (SF, Chicago vs. Cincy, KC/Oak). And, of course, Rose's RC is way bigger than Bench's RC. I also misspoke 2nd and 3rd overall at the end. Wow, some whoppers for sure!
Great rundown John! 1964 and 1967 are my favorites. However '66, '65 and '69 have moved up on my list. I like the simple designs with the team name across the top or bottom of the cards. I like the backs of '63 and '68. I like yellow on my cards, lol. To be honest, I'm not as much of a fan of 1962 anymore. They're nice but I like the All-Star cards better than the base.
Beautiful cards. The 1967 set is nice,that's the year I started collecting cards. I got more serious in 1968 and almost collected the whole set. They did a good job on the pitchers' portraits I feel. Nice video!
I should keep an eye out on some more of the '68 pitcher cards. Thanks for mentioning that, and for watching!
My grading- 65, 67, 63, 68, 62. Thanks for the video. Really love the seventies sets though, particularly the 72 and 75 sets. They were very colorful and really reflected that era. On a negative but hopefully helpful suggestion: try to work on eliminating your uhm’s. Most people struggle with that. Thanks again!
Thanks for watching and for the feedback. I try to be cognizant of them, but I don't always actively remember. Appreciate you pointing it out!
I 100% agree with you that 1965 is #1 design. I had '65 in mind as soon as I clicked on this video.
Again, it speaks to that legacy piece. I guess you could say it's an iconic set in that way. The most iconic sets of the '60s (or any decade) could be a cool take on rankings. For that descriptor, I'd add 1960 with '65 and '63 in the top three because of that unique design. Thanks for watching!