"Why Gaia is not the Globe." Panel debate with Bruno Latour

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 มิ.ย. 2016
  • Panel debate following talk by Bruno Lastour with the title: "Why Gaia is not the Globe - and why our future depends on not confusing the two."
    The talk was given June 2, 2016 at The School of Culture and Society, Aarhus University, Denmark in the Futures Lecture Series. Learn more at: cas.au.dk/en/currently/events/...

ความคิดเห็น • 9

  • @HipHopLived
    @HipHopLived 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone who says we must be protected from the stupidity of ordinary people is firstly someone who should reflect on themselves and secondly some one who we urgently must be protected against.

  • @BillyMcBride
    @BillyMcBride 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Percy Bysshe Shelley has Gaia in "Prometheus Unbound" and Shakespeare's theater was the "Globe," but in poetry there are more instances of "Earth" and "world" than "Globe" or "Gaia." As scientic/political/philosophical battles strive against poetical views, I wonder if this is related to the difference between what seems to me a battle between "Gaia" and "Earth." Are we just fighting over a conceptual diction? If so, then it is a poetical battle, but if we are fighting for justice, then it is something more to learn than which words we need to chose to get good action done.

    • @BillyMcBride
      @BillyMcBride 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Some people may mistake Gaia for the Globe, and the Globe for Gaia, calling them by the wrong names.

    • @edwinbywater
      @edwinbywater 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      But that's irrelevant according to Latour, because that's all British

    • @aristakelso5655
      @aristakelso5655 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@BillyMcBride I am one of these persons. I don´t get the difference between Gaia and Globe, can you please explain it to me?
      I mean fish and animals in general live on the globe, right? So people live on the globe too, but seperate themselves through material things and think they live in Gaia?
      please tell me, it would make me really happy

    • @BillyMcBride
      @BillyMcBride 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@aristakelso5655 the way I see things is through the eyes of poetry. "Earth" and "world" are words which are what the poets use more than "Globe" or "Gaia." When the "Globe" comes to my mind, I think of Shakespeare and his theater by that name. And, when I think of "Gaia," it is a word Shelley uses for a character in his "Prometheus Unbound." I don't know where Shelley got it, but it would be interesting to know. As Gaia is a more mythological term, and Shelley is a more mythological and romantic poet, one who goes further back into tradition, in one way, to choose this word "Gaia' for his character, it makes for a poem which has a flavor of something much more ancient than "Globe." In this way, "Gaia" recalls the ancient mythologies, and "globe" more modern realities. So in this case, the difference is of a distance in time span. To choose between words is to have various freedoms between effects of choosing those words. And yet both Gaia and Globe are valid for getting our meaning across for the same thing, except as with Latour, he wishes to stir the pot by looking at how we use these words, and he derives this idea that when we choose one word over the other, it does not mean the other, and he gives reasons for why that is so. I may not completely be answering your question, however since I love poetry much more than philosophy, when it comes to diction, I think of the process of coming up with a poem in the making, but when I think of longer phrases of that process, I think of poetry. I have never used "Gaia" in any poem I have written but I may one day. But since I love poetry more than philosophy, my understanding of Latour's analysis is limited by what I am interested by. Fish and animals live, and we live, and we are the ones who use language. It may not make much difference for them what we call the place where they dwell, but for us it seems rightly paradoxical to not be in one when we feel we are in the other. I think that that paradox is at the heart of Latour's argument. I happen to like paradoxes, so I think he is interesting. But I don't think there is an easy way out of this paradox, so I am willing to see if anyone else in the future is moved to clear up the matter too. But I can live more tolerably with paradoxes as long as I can still have those raptures of flight which make me happy when I read good poetry.

  • @paolomath
    @paolomath 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is there something meaningful and interesting amongst the word salads on the table? I sincerely would like to know.

  • @FlatStuffEarth
    @FlatStuffEarth 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    flat