pure theoritical abstract for the sake of research and quest, enquiry, scrutiny, lapping the borders and discoveries to go (towards) beyond our comprehension or apprehension of the practical....
Very good call. Depends on whether "founder of sociology" is taken to mean "earliest" or something similar (Khaldun is much earlier), or "of foundational importance in getting the modern working discipline of sociology going". - Cheers, Jack
For the most part, this one: www.amazon.com/Great-Political-Thinkers-Plato-Present/dp/0155078895/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1482166215&sr=1-1&keywords=ebenstein
@@jacksanders2611, is there any available this book in PDF. I searched this book on the internet , I want free PDF. It is not available. If it is they can share please.
Sorry professor. But you have given the worst possible definition of philosophy ever. I would never expect a philosophy professor to use the phrase "that don't yet have CLEAR CUT answers". It raises another important philosophical question, WHAT IS A CLEAR CUT ANSWER? Then it would raise the question, "WHAT KNOWLEDGE IS TRUE AND VALID ?, the it will keep circling into different areas of philosophy. It is basically a circular definition. Philosophy was/is and will be the act of debating and deciding the axioms/presuppositions of any field of enquiry.
Yea . That is why they said “does not have CLEAR CUT ANSWERS” as what you are saying are philosophical questions which also “DO NOT HAVE CLEAR CUT ANSWER” . So it all boils down to what professor thinks of philosphy to be .
pure theoritical abstract for the sake of research and quest, enquiry, scrutiny, lapping the borders and discoveries to go (towards) beyond our comprehension or apprehension of the practical....
This is so educative, thanks
I really love this lectures, thank you so much for uploading
Love it Jack ! Came from Intro to this 🙏
amazing.
Thanks for the lectures
august comte ... founder of sociology ? what about ibn khaldun
Very good call. Depends on whether "founder of sociology" is taken to mean "earliest" or something similar (Khaldun is much earlier), or "of foundational importance in getting the modern working discipline of sociology going". - Cheers, Jack
What book are you using?
For the most part, this one: www.amazon.com/Great-Political-Thinkers-Plato-Present/dp/0155078895/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1482166215&sr=1-1&keywords=ebenstein
Thanks
course webpage
@@jacksanders2611, is there any available this book in PDF. I searched this book on the internet , I want free PDF. It is not available. If it is they can share please.
It would be nice if there is subtitle .
well it's great lecture i would like to know what is the lecturer philosopher name , and what university is this.
John T. (Jack) Sanders, Rochester Institute of Technology
Sir these lectures belong to which year? Do these require updates from the students' side?
What year was this?
4,000 BC
@@jacksanders2611 Lol, no. When was this lecture recorded?
Sorry professor. But you have given the worst possible definition of philosophy ever.
I would never expect a philosophy professor to use the phrase "that don't yet have CLEAR CUT answers". It raises another important philosophical question, WHAT IS A CLEAR CUT ANSWER? Then it would raise the question, "WHAT KNOWLEDGE IS TRUE AND VALID ?, the it will keep circling into different areas of philosophy. It is basically a circular definition.
Philosophy was/is and will be the act of debating and deciding the axioms/presuppositions of any field of enquiry.
Yea . That is why they said “does not have CLEAR CUT ANSWERS” as what you are saying are philosophical questions which also “DO NOT HAVE CLEAR CUT ANSWER” . So it all boils down to what professor thinks of philosphy to be .