The reverb wasn't too bad on my phone loudspeaker. Just a suggestion, but some Chelsea shirts hanging up behind you would maybe dampen that reverb nicely! 💙
Well he made bad decisions as sporting director (understandable as he was way unqualified) and everyone has just assumed he still has that kind of influence
Boehly wants to make Chelsea Blues the Dodger Blues of the Prem-Wanted to sign big stars like Osimhen like Boehly signed superstar Ohtani. The Eggman doesn’t want to pay for Osimhen. Divorce is inevitable.
Agreed. Remember Todd wanted galacticos like Ronaldo, Messi, Neymar. For various reasons, mainly cost, he didn't get that. Osimhen was probably the last straw.
So, I think there is some truth to this, and I think the Victor situation may have been the last straw. My primary issue with this is: we know very little about Clearlake in this arena. They have tried to buy major sports franchises before, and failed primarily due to lack of ownership experience. The were approved by Raine for our purchase based primarily because on Boehly’s experience. If they were gonna drive Boehly out after 2 years, Raine wouldn’t have approved them.
I think Boehly backed Poch, even Poch said they had a nice dinner together a couple nights before he was sacked. The decision to sack Poch may have been the final straw for Boehly. Boehly had wanted Poch after the buyout first occurred. I fully expect Boehly to end up involved with another club.
Yes he publicly backed him. Personally wanted MP gone but had come to terms him staying was better given our reluctance to get a better proven manager. Hopefully Maresca is not worse, it's too early to judge.
@@hnaku8748 on the long term a system will win you things. City or Arsenal can bring new players in their team so easy because they know what kind of player they need in what position. They know from each other where they are on the pitch, wich runs they will make and where they have to play the ball in different situations. Thats how you can play good football consistently and win trophies in the end. Fair to say that Arsenal keep bottling but in the end they are competing for big trophies every season now
Much prefer Boehly to those who are solely private equity. Seems we may get the opposite. Don’t want to react prematurely but darker days seem likely for a period. KTBFFH
There needs to be a serious debate about how much longer supporters should put up with Clearlake. Apart from sacking 3 permanent managers who were supposed to be part of a 'long term' project, their main passion has been to make our rivals better. Arsenal would not sell us Smith-Rowe a couple of years ago because we are a rival. We give Arsenal 3 proven international players. Kovacic to Man City, Mount to Man U, Rudiger to Real Madrird, Christianson to Barcelona, willing to sell Gallagher to Villa. Our squad now is no better than the one they inherited although spent a fortune. Will these young wonderkids ever get to the first team before being sold for profit? Clueless Clueless Clearlake!!!
Boehly owns the dodgers he wants to win and I mean he wants his sports team to be winners . The Clearlake punks are just financed entity who just wants profit they don’t care about wins they care about pure profit. I’m mad cuss boehly is an amazing owner look at the dodgers he just throws dollars like the old Chelsea owner hit the ex owner just had an amazing staff that made the decisions
Personally, I liked the blue aura of your previous setup as it was very calming, especially when covering a team like Chelsea, but I'll keep an open mind and wait for the finished product.
Even boehly couldn't trust the process & yet the narrative is being pushed down the fanbase's throats! Toxic positivity bs never beats reality! HOLD THAT!
Why I struggle with this is because it was Todd who pushed to buy us, you'd think he'd want to stay. But it coming from Bloomberg gives it sooo much weight
I think he does want to stay. But given Clearlake hold majority he has lesser say in matters, which puts him in a dilemma. Why would anyone want to take accountability if he/she/they aren't even responsible for it. It would be like Wyss or Walter solely taking blame for matters when they're mostly investors. Initially Boehly was supposed to be the one in charge, one that was more than just an investor, but they've taken that power away from him. So of course he's rethinking his position.
@@HahahahaKez There seems to be only one thing that adds up to me - Boehly finds another investor willing to buy out ClearLake. I don't see how ClearLake invests more in Chelsea if the option exists to make a big profit off the shares here and now. Since no logical businessman would give an "offer you can't refuse" type profit, it'll have to be oil money or somebody will silly billions with some sentimental attachment to the club or European Football.
How this club has imploded so much and so quickly should be a warning to all fans before they start singing about sacking their board and screaming for new owners
The straw we're clinging on to is them not taking dividends, thank heavens for Roman who put in the 'no Glazer' clause. Because given the evidence shown by Clearlake, it's very obvious they would have done it if possible. Which would make them no worse than the Glazers. They're now structuring the club so that it is financially profitable in a resale, doesn't matter we win or not on-pitch in the process. The current player strategy makes sense if viewed in that sense. With all the young players being seed assets. Overall harmony doesn't matter in that plan, as long as they're individually profitable. Hence even the stockpiling of certain positions we're already filled with. It's more about nurturing undervalued assets than creating a winning team.
So... that's the problem with consortiums. They might be buying to invest and get something out of it, but this sounds like a clash of values. Maybe Todd's philosophy and values of running the club simply don't align with what Egbahli and co want - hence the latter possibly wanting more ownership. Perhaps this is one of the reasons why Poch left. (Maybe he was Boehly's choice?) But Egbahli and co wanted to impose their own set of ideas - wanted their own man...to follow 'their own rules', possibly impatient with what had happened previously. Problem is we're still left with a club that is going through 'YET' even more upheaval and change. I'm interested to see what will happen in the second half of the season, if we don't achieve 6th place or higher - or once we realise we're no longer a major trophy winning force as before. What will they do next and how will they deal with our divided support?... I'm intrigued to see those who support Egbahli and co this year....will they be content if we end up trophyless and below 6th place this season? As always...time will tell with the Chelsea circus.
I must say Yan, thank you for the timely content. I don’t always agree with your presentation style or views but your uploads are by far the most timely and that is commendable. Thank you for your time and attention to all things Chelsea.
ambience it's a problem. It's the nature of the ambience that is the issue. As a musician I would have thought you'd know that better than anybody. The current room reflections aren't really that bad. Whatever you did to the room before made it MUCH WORSE than it is now. You have a slight standing wave in the room. I'd recommend putting up a big mirror to shape the sonic characteristics of the room slightly upwards to give yourself a more open optimistic acoustic halo.
From what we are given to understand Chelsea’s plan includes a 4 transfer window blitz and then starting to trade less. I think that the owners will still need to get the striker position sealed. They did not manage to get it done in four but one more purchase in window five should see the squad become more or less complete so we can go forward and get the team to become one of the Best in the world again. We need to win the club world cup and with the EUCL also, means that we maintain our record of winning every trophy possible in world club football. Making more history. Go on you Chels💙💙💙💙💙💙💙
It makes sense that the share allotment can change. If one of the major investors isn’t a good fit for Clear Lake or Clear Lake discovers a gap in their management structure they have some flexibility to realign the level of influence related to equity to ensure Blue Co. sustainability.
@@shivamUTC @Jupitersonlyson Might as well put hidden cameras everywhere at Chelsea and turn it into Eastenders level entertainment call it "Westenders" 😂
Chelsea are too big to fail. If clearlake stay we are going to have a great future. He has made many positive signings. boehly made a few mistakes from the start, but mistakes are part of business.
It all depends on the shareholder agreement. Usually you can buy each other out within the corporation and have voting rights etc associated to the shares.
The Ricketts would’ve been a better ownership choice for Chelsea. There are similar parallels between the Cubs & Chelsea. They’ve navigated the difficult stadium situation successfully (Boehly hasn’t) and are “fan friendly” in their business approach.
Interesting what price would be payed for each share. CFC/BlueCo not worth close to the original price as the asset has been so devalued by the incompetence.
Screw Clearlake we want boehly boehly does not like buying players and paying cheap wages boehly is upset cuss the Clearlake structure does not want to pay big they want to have the Brighton structure profiting and not winning . Boehly just wants to throw money and win and be on tv photographed
Todd is a celebrity. As much as his spending is aimless, I think his heart is actually to win. He just needed better direction with the money. I hope Boehly is able to buy clearlake out.
I reckon Boehley wanted to be like Man City and stick his middle finger up to the "rules" and fight them the whole way to get what he wants. Whereas Clearlake looks at it as a proper business and want to abide by the financial rules. A disagreement about this would certainly create tensions.
Think some of the issues between Clearlake and Todd are down to Todd always giving interviews and talking about stuff. Maybe Clearlake is not pleased with that???
I called this the day they took over no such thing as a successful consortium running a football club because Who ? has the final say just a bunch of different chefs in the kitchen. It was doomed to fail from the start.
Hopefully it’s Boehly that comes out on top. He’s got his flaws but you can tell he’s a sportsman whereas Egbahli wants use to be a selling club like Brighton or BVB for profit
my only worry is most likely Clearlake will buy boehly off, but Clearlake our an investment business eventually it wont be about putting money into Chelsea, it will be about taking it out, i felt that whilst boehly made some errors, he was the guy with a track history of making sports teams successful. either way its worrying times.
Did they not establish the company BlueCo to buy Chelsea and later Strasbourg? If BlueCo owns 100% of Chelsea and they own shares in BlueCo, they could essentially sell the BlueCo shares and they would be able to transfer ownership of the club without selling shares in the club.
Publicly airing laundry. Postering amid frosty relations. We know who has the money, power and influence. Sometimes the passenger or back seat passenger is just that, no more. A time and place for everything. Defining the new Chelsea landscape is evolving or morphing.
Egbahli is at the games but he sits there smiling and joking when we are losing Roman would never do that he cared and kicked every ball a true caring owner will always be missed that's why we will always love him ktbffh
If we are picking sides now i'll choose todd. At least he did have a sport franchise that's succesfull to back his visions for chelsea to be a succesfull team. Clearlake on the other hand might just see chelsea as a brand that could be use for business gains rather than actually being a winning football team.
There are three rules of power: 1) Achieve power 2) Keep power 3) Read above What's happening isn't about football. it isn't about the success of a football club called chelsea, it's about power
Clearlake Boehly Wyss and Walter can all sell there within themselves guessing the rule about selling shares would only apply to an external 3rd party normally in a structure like this there is first refusal to the other shareholders. I l think if Boehly sells the Wyss and Walter will sell too, Wyss originally said he was invited to be part of the consortium and I’m pretty sure in one of your video when we were going to be sold (og goat gang) he wasn’t really interested in football. Walter is a mate of Boehly so the consortium is a marriage of convenience which will break up eventually. I’m interested to hear about what is the issue about the stadium think one set of owners want to move the others want to stay which is interesting but who
Wouldn't mind if Wyss sells. But we need a major sporting figure in the upper hierarchy. It's a sports club afterall. I think after all the drama, CPO shareholders are more than justified if the majority vote not to hand the land to the current lot.
I think Chelsea are on the lips is bc we are being very smart and clinical and clever with the business side and ppl are starting to see the plan coming to fruition. Whatever #ktbffh
Clearlake is clueless. The value of the club has dropped. Business valuations are based on the cash flow they generate. Aston Villa, Everton and Newcastle are all valued at £500-600 million It is hard to argue that Chelsea are now worth more. Roman Abramovich bought Chelsea for £140m in 2003. It was due to the club's success that he increased the club's value and also that of the PL. They became an elite club. Boehly may want out before his investment is worth pennies on the dollar. Eghbali seems to view the club as his plaything, implementing crackpot theories, criticizing Poch's training methods and constantly trading players. Boehly can perhaps see the writing on the wall.
I thought they were legally obliged to own the club for ten years as per the contract when they bought it so the club couldn’t be flipped for profit. Lols has to be worth less than they bought it for now.
@@FootballTherapy Oh I get it...but if you lower the camera slightly and then angle the camera up a fraction it will go. It only need to be small amounts. Not sure what you mean by it's flat though. Are you talking about the front of the lens being perpendicular to your face? With such a wide lens this is important to be fair...
Yan how do you feel about even if one of them sell ,they would still own some Chelsea assets they sold to themselves like the Hotels?🤔......don't know why but it feels like we're getting mugged here lol
@@altibzz they sold the hotels and training ground to blueco which also owns Chelsea but now Chelsea dnt own the own training ground so if blueco sell Chelsea they can do so with out training ground or make new owner pay more for the training ground
In my humble opinion, I prefer the ownership of Eghbali over Boehly. clearlake have got a clear vision and have taken decisive steps towards how they want to run the club. Firing of Tuchel and Hiring of Potter, that 1st window of Sterling and Auba were all had Boehly written all over it and it went pretty bad. Enzo Fernandez signing is also not helping us at all. Boehly had some vision but execution was missing. Since Eghbali has gotten involved more, I'm able to see more methodical approach and execution is great. Maresca is a clever coach who will take time, but has a clear idea. Eghbali didnt let Osimhen dictate us the terms. Massive reduction of wage bill, all these have been steps towards executing Clearlake's vision. I believe the direction where we are going into and complete ownership of Clearlake will start to give us great results in near future.
Boehly wanted to run shit like they do with the Dodgers and sign elite players to win, Eghbali wanted the sign every player 22 and under strategy, he did it with the Dodgers, Within the first couple of months Boehly and his group made a mega trade for 3 all stars then signed a pitcher to a 150 mil contract and won a bidding war for the best Korean pitcher at the time AND started to put together the best farm system in baseball, pretty much every report said he was fine with Tuchel as well but Eghbali wanted him gone
Gonna populate the walls behind me with Chelsea stuff in the coming days. Thanks as always for your support
@@FootballTherapy Don't bruv , keep it clean!!! Have it match your personality and shit!!!
You could be a Mark Gold bridge!!!
@Jupitersonlyson he's a chelsea fan blud and he is yan not goldbridge, if you want to watch Goldbridge go watch him 😂
@@kezza6133 Naaaa free Palestine 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The reverb wasn't too bad on my phone loudspeaker. Just a suggestion, but some Chelsea shirts hanging up behind you would maybe dampen that reverb nicely! 💙
Makes sense. Todd's been taking blame for other people's decisions for too long
He's been the scapegoat from day 1
@@AR-ktbffh For the sole reason that he's American, too.
Well he made bad decisions as sporting director (understandable as he was way unqualified) and everyone has just assumed he still has that kind of influence
Boehly wants to make Chelsea Blues the Dodger Blues of the Prem-Wanted to sign big stars like Osimhen like Boehly signed superstar Ohtani. The Eggman doesn’t want to pay for Osimhen. Divorce is inevitable.
Agreed. Remember Todd wanted galacticos like Ronaldo, Messi, Neymar. For various reasons, mainly cost, he didn't get that. Osimhen was probably the last straw.
Ohtani doesn't exist
So, I think there is some truth to this, and I think the Victor situation may have been the last straw. My primary issue with this is: we know very little about Clearlake in this arena. They have tried to buy major sports franchises before, and failed primarily due to lack of ownership experience. The were approved by Raine for our purchase based primarily because on Boehly’s experience. If they were gonna drive Boehly out after 2 years, Raine wouldn’t have approved them.
Is this your guess of what he happened?
I think Boehly backed Poch, even Poch said they had a nice dinner together a couple nights before he was sacked. The decision to sack Poch may have been the final straw for Boehly. Boehly had wanted Poch after the buyout first occurred. I fully expect Boehly to end up involved with another club.
Sabotage internally
Yes he publicly backed him.
Personally wanted MP gone but had come to terms him staying was better given our reluctance to get a better proven manager. Hopefully Maresca is not worse, it's too early to judge.
@@hnaku8748in terms of playing a certain system Maresca already improved massively.
@@BaaarV System doesn't win you things. Competence does. For me we only need the latter, whatever the approach.
@@hnaku8748 on the long term a system will win you things. City or Arsenal can bring new players in their team so easy because they know what kind of player they need in what position. They know from each other where they are on the pitch, wich runs they will make and where they have to play the ball in different situations. Thats how you can play good football consistently and win trophies in the end. Fair to say that Arsenal keep bottling but in the end they are competing for big trophies every season now
Todd Boehly needs to partner up with the PSG owner Sheikh Jazeem or the Saudi by buying the majority shareholder.
VIt will be the very best decision of the century...if Boehly hook up with the Saudis
@@boqoryare1984 Makes sense. ClearLake will take profit on their shares and go do something else. Oil money doesn't care about overpaying
🤧 thee best idea ever🔥🔥😭
Hey 🇹🇹 from Trinidad keep up d good work
🇹🇹 Trini here too my brother. Love in da house 👊🏿
@@Chelseafan4life_🇹🇹we here
Much prefer Boehly to those who are solely private equity. Seems we may get the opposite. Don’t want to react prematurely but darker days seem likely for a period. KTBFFH
There needs to be a serious debate about how much longer supporters should put up with Clearlake. Apart from sacking 3 permanent managers who were supposed to be part of a 'long term' project, their main passion has been to make our rivals better. Arsenal would not sell us Smith-Rowe a couple of years ago because we are a rival. We give Arsenal 3 proven international players. Kovacic to Man City, Mount to Man U, Rudiger to Real Madrird, Christianson to Barcelona, willing to sell Gallagher to Villa. Our squad now is no better than the one they inherited although spent a fortune. Will these young wonderkids ever get to the first team before being sold for profit? Clueless Clueless Clearlake!!!
Boehly owns the dodgers he wants to win and I mean he wants his sports team to be winners . The Clearlake punks are just financed entity who just wants profit they don’t care about wins they care about pure profit. I’m mad cuss boehly is an amazing owner look at the dodgers he just throws dollars like the old Chelsea owner hit the ex owner just had an amazing staff that made the decisions
If so why wouldn't they want to win, the more they win the more profit they'd make
Personally, I liked the blue aura of your previous setup as it was very calming, especially when covering a team like Chelsea, but I'll keep an open mind and wait for the finished product.
Saw the news on Twitter and I knew I had a bloke and a top G, who will break the news down into understandable parts!! Keep up the good work Yan
Consortiums suck
Even boehly couldn't trust the process & yet the narrative is being pushed down the fanbase's throats! Toxic positivity bs never beats reality! HOLD THAT!
Hi from Budapest,Hungary 💙🤝🇭🇺
Hungarians support Chelsea?
People support chelsea all over the world mate..
@@Jupitersonlyson🤔🤔 as far as i know Hungary s in Europe...
Do you need food?
@@thierryhenry674 what about you from Africa? Has your mommy water to clean her hijab❤️🙉🙉
Why I struggle with this is because it was Todd who pushed to buy us, you'd think he'd want to stay. But it coming from Bloomberg gives it sooo much weight
He apparently does want to buy them out, but given the amounts they own respectively that doesn’t seem likely.
I think he does want to stay. But given Clearlake hold majority he has lesser say in matters, which puts him in a dilemma. Why would anyone want to take accountability if he/she/they aren't even responsible for it. It would be like Wyss or Walter solely taking blame for matters when they're mostly investors.
Initially Boehly was supposed to be the one in charge, one that was more than just an investor, but they've taken that power away from him. So of course he's rethinking his position.
Coming from Telegraph too
@@FootballTherapyyan, you keep saying bohely is no where to be seen. We saw him walk out of the game against city when they scored the second.
@@HahahahaKez There seems to be only one thing that adds up to me - Boehly finds another investor willing to buy out ClearLake. I don't see how ClearLake invests more in Chelsea if the option exists to make a big profit off the shares here and now. Since no logical businessman would give an "offer you can't refuse" type profit, it'll have to be oil money or somebody will silly billions with some sentimental attachment to the club or European Football.
My hope is that Todd buys out the other minority owners and over time increases his power within Chelsea
Truly sad to see our club falling like this. Truly sad 😢
Very sad😢
'falling' we finished 6 places higher last season than the one before lol
@altibzz WOW, what a great achievement we finished mid table 👏 👏👏 get outta here brah 🥱
@@sasuke_uchiha_is_justice bro he is simply saying we're getting better from the season before dumbass 😂
@@altibzz Wonder who were in charge the season before last. 🤔
Big up the man dem!! 🔥
How this club has imploded so much and so quickly should be a warning to all fans before they start singing about sacking their board and screaming for new owners
The straw we're clinging on to is them not taking dividends, thank heavens for Roman who put in the 'no Glazer' clause. Because given the evidence shown by Clearlake, it's very obvious they would have done it if possible. Which would make them no worse than the Glazers. They're now structuring the club so that it is financially profitable in a resale, doesn't matter we win or not on-pitch in the process.
The current player strategy makes sense if viewed in that sense. With all the young players being seed assets. Overall harmony doesn't matter in that plan, as long as they're individually profitable. Hence even the stockpiling of certain positions we're already filled with. It's more about nurturing undervalued assets than creating a winning team.
Todd attended the Manchester city and Chelsea game at the start of the season but he even left before the final whistle
I honestly don’t blame Bohley. He gets blamed for everything when he is one face of several
So... that's the problem with consortiums. They might be buying to invest and get something out of it, but this sounds like a clash of values. Maybe Todd's philosophy and values of running the club simply don't align with what Egbahli and co want - hence the latter possibly wanting more ownership. Perhaps this is one of the reasons why Poch left. (Maybe he was Boehly's choice?) But Egbahli and co wanted to impose their own set of ideas - wanted their own man...to follow 'their own rules', possibly impatient with what had happened previously. Problem is we're still left with a club that is going through 'YET' even more upheaval and change. I'm interested to see what will happen in the second half of the season, if we don't achieve 6th place or higher - or once we realise we're no longer a major trophy winning force as before. What will they do next and how will they deal with our divided support?... I'm intrigued to see those who support Egbahli and co this year....will they be content if we end up trophyless and below 6th place this season? As always...time will tell with the Chelsea circus.
I must say Yan, thank you for the timely content. I don’t always agree with your presentation style or views but your uploads are by far the most timely and that is commendable. Thank you for your time and attention to all things Chelsea.
Thanks man! Game of opinions at the end of the day!
We did see Todd Boehly in Match week 1 vs City. He stormed off before the final whistle.
I preferred the blue. Sorry. Now it looks boring
ambience it's a problem. It's the nature of the ambience that is the issue. As a musician I would have thought you'd know that better than anybody. The current room reflections aren't really that bad. Whatever you did to the room before made it MUCH WORSE than it is now. You have a slight standing wave in the room. I'd recommend putting up a big mirror to shape the sonic characteristics of the room slightly upwards to give yourself a more open optimistic acoustic halo.
From what we are given to understand Chelsea’s plan includes a 4 transfer window blitz and then starting to trade less. I think that the owners will still need to get the striker position sealed. They did not manage to get it done in four but one more purchase in window five should see the squad become more or less complete so we can go forward and get the team to become one of the Best in the world again. We need to win the club world cup and with the EUCL also, means that we maintain our record of winning every trophy possible in world club football. Making more history. Go on you Chels💙💙💙💙💙💙💙
It makes sense that the share allotment can change. If one of the major investors isn’t a good fit for Clear Lake or Clear Lake discovers a gap in their management structure they have some flexibility to realign the level of influence related to equity to ensure Blue Co. sustainability.
Good. Be projecting them when you read. That will help so we all can read along
I actually the background as is Yan and with the White Tshirt is actually a really cool video look :) Sometimes different is a good change :)
*like the background
Our club always has drama 🙄
@@HanishPatelDONZAIOFFICIAL Have drama? Bruv we are fking drama!!!!
@@Jupitersonlyson’THE’ fking drama 🤣
@@shivamUTC @Jupitersonlyson Might as well put hidden cameras everywhere at Chelsea and turn it into Eastenders level entertainment call it "Westenders" 😂
Chelsea are too big to fail. If clearlake stay we are going to have a great future. He has made many positive signings. boehly made a few mistakes from the start, but mistakes are part of business.
Very predictable when you bring in asset flippers. People calling out the obvious for a long time gets called negative lol!
Literally the only Chelsea guy I'll listen to, great content as always. Nice to listen to an actual fan who isn't opinionated and being a dick.
It all depends on the shareholder agreement. Usually you can buy each other out within the corporation and have voting rights etc associated to the shares.
Touché on the Mike ashley comment!
Greetings from South Africa ..
GIK Acoustics do fantastic room treatment
The Ricketts would’ve been a better ownership choice for Chelsea. There are similar parallels between the Cubs & Chelsea. They’ve navigated the difficult stadium situation successfully (Boehly hasn’t) and are “fan friendly” in their business approach.
Boehly could back himself by saying I have the dodgers that’s a crazy profit team
Great content! Every episode is a combination of professionalism and interesting material. Thank you so much!🖤😝❗️
Tbh i liked your setup a lot with darkness but i get your point
Interesting what price would be payed for each share. CFC/BlueCo not worth close to the original price as the asset has been so devalued by the incompetence.
Lots of IFs BUTs and MAYBEs on this channel. LOVE IT 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Oh sure you do. You're a rival.
Thanks for your view and comment mate. Keep coming back x
Still lesser than 115 ifs buts and maybes.
Looks crap and budget now bud, the zoom angle and focus is better than distance
He’s not finished with the room, so it’s hard to decide how it will look once decorated
Screw Clearlake we want boehly boehly does not like buying players and paying cheap wages boehly is upset cuss the Clearlake structure does not want to pay big they want to have the Brighton structure profiting and not winning . Boehly just wants to throw money and win and be on tv photographed
Todd is a celebrity. As much as his spending is aimless, I think his heart is actually to win. He just needed better direction with the money. I hope Boehly is able to buy clearlake out.
If Boehly leaves we’re doomed
Uts end game if he goes he wants chelsea to he great clear cap is the end of chelsea
I reckon Boehley wanted to be like Man City and stick his middle finger up to the "rules" and fight them the whole way to get what he wants. Whereas Clearlake looks at it as a proper business and want to abide by the financial rules. A disagreement about this would certainly create tensions.
Think some of the issues between Clearlake and Todd are down to Todd always giving interviews and talking about stuff. Maybe Clearlake is not pleased with that???
Doubtful. He has put himself out front willingly taking all the heat. The others hide.
I called this the day they took over no such thing as a successful consortium running a football club because Who ? has the final say just a bunch of different chefs in the kitchen. It was doomed to fail from the start.
Why can't we just have Abramovich back 😭
Putin and UK government. 😢
You can thank Putin for invading the Ukraine 🤷🏾♂️
Hopefully it’s Boehly that comes out on top. He’s got his flaws but you can tell he’s a sportsman whereas Egbahli wants use to be a selling club like Brighton or BVB for profit
Yan what’s going on with the shirt sponsor?
Funny thing is, this season has promise and the club is a keeper and striker away from a solid team
Bohely is the savior only he can make Chelsea win a d not on profits
my only worry is most likely Clearlake will buy boehly off, but Clearlake our an investment business eventually it wont be about putting money into Chelsea, it will be about taking it out, i felt that whilst boehly made some errors, he was the guy with a track history of making sports teams successful.
either way its worrying times.
Now that you point it out, the old set / background was too dark.
Did they not establish the company BlueCo to buy Chelsea and later Strasbourg? If BlueCo owns 100% of Chelsea and they own shares in BlueCo, they could essentially sell the BlueCo shares and they would be able to transfer ownership of the club without selling shares in the club.
What’s happening about our shirt sponsor tho ?
Publicly airing laundry. Postering amid frosty relations. We know who has the money, power and influence. Sometimes the passenger or back seat passenger is just that, no more. A time and place for everything. Defining the new Chelsea landscape is evolving or morphing.
Could have navy blue stripes or dots or Chelsea cress on all three walls
Egbahli is at the games but he sits there smiling and joking when we are losing Roman would never do that he cared and kicked every ball a true caring owner will always be missed that's why we will always love him ktbffh
Bhoely was always the face. Track record with sport teams. Clearlake wouldn't have pedigree to buy a club alone. It's a structured move probably.
If we are picking sides now i'll choose todd. At least he did have a sport franchise that's succesfull to back his visions for chelsea to be a succesfull team. Clearlake on the other hand might just see chelsea as a brand that could be use for business gains rather than actually being a winning football team.
There are three rules of power:
1) Achieve power
2) Keep power
3) Read above
What's happening isn't about football. it isn't about the success of a football club called chelsea, it's about power
It’s extremely sad to see the club I love in such despair I don’t recognise my club anymore I just want some good positive news lol
I wonder if this is fallout from sacking Poch, and failing to sign Osimhen etc...difference in opinions?
Yes Yan!!
Imagine Ken b. If he is alive, Roman or Marina, E. Musk buys todds shares.
Yan, Todd was at the city game? He left when it got to 2-0
It would be mad if marina and Roman invested in the club through Reiner group for a minority share
I remember you telling us all that this group of clowns were the ones to back buying our club in the first place.
Boehly stepping back then selling his minority holding makes sense. Shareholders will have pre emptive rights to be offered each others shares
He was literally at the city game 😂
Yes. That was when he decided to quit. It was a horrible game.
@@dseer7409 need to learn how to walk before you can run buddy it’s a project things will get better
Clearlake Boehly Wyss and Walter can all sell there within themselves guessing the rule about selling shares would only apply to an external 3rd party normally in a structure like this there is first refusal to the other shareholders. I l think if Boehly sells the Wyss and Walter will sell too, Wyss originally said he was invited to be part of the consortium and I’m pretty sure in one of your video when we were going to be sold (og goat gang) he wasn’t really interested in football. Walter is a mate of Boehly so the consortium is a marriage of convenience which will break up eventually. I’m interested to hear about what is the issue about the stadium think one set of owners want to move the others want to stay which is interesting but who
Wouldn't mind if Wyss sells. But we need a major sporting figure in the upper hierarchy. It's a sports club afterall.
I think after all the drama, CPO shareholders are more than justified if the majority vote not to hand the land to the current lot.
Lol I can see you're enjoying that stream deck
Hi Yan from hau hin thailand.
new room!!
I think Chelsea are on the lips is bc we are being very smart and clinical and clever with the business side and ppl are starting to see the plan coming to fruition. Whatever #ktbffh
The headline looks interesting
Clearlake is clueless. The value of the club has dropped. Business valuations are based on the cash flow they generate. Aston Villa, Everton and Newcastle are all valued at £500-600 million It is hard to argue that Chelsea are now worth more. Roman Abramovich bought Chelsea for £140m in 2003. It was due to the club's success that he increased the club's value and also that of the PL. They became an elite club. Boehly may want out before his investment is worth pennies on the dollar. Eghbali seems to view the club as his plaything, implementing crackpot theories, criticizing Poch's training methods and constantly trading players. Boehly can perhaps see the writing on the wall.
I thought they were legally obliged to own the club for ten years as per the contract when they bought it so the club couldn’t be flipped for profit. Lols has to be worth less than they bought it for now.
Feliciano is making a new album maybe that’s why you never see him..😂
Return of the Hazard Funko Pop pls
Why? Why Clearlake not buy the whole show at the outset?
A hedge fund deciding to hedge an investment? Who'd've ever thought?
@@davereckoning5910 have no fear, challenging for the top prize next season!
I prefer the Todd Father to the voiceless 😂
I swear you rejig things every video Yan lmao
11:51 what have the Dodgers won recently to make them such a winning team ..
Did you just pull a Chelsea and do a complete revamp 😂
From UK 🇬🇧 😊😊😊😊
hello, from malaysia
Sorry to be picky…but you should Lower the camera and raise the camera angle slightly.
Crop the plug sockets off the bottom left 😂
It's flat but it's a wide angle lens which brings it in shot
@@FootballTherapy Oh I get it...but if you lower the camera slightly and then angle the camera up a fraction it will go. It only need to be small amounts. Not sure what you mean by it's flat though. Are you talking about the front of the lens being perpendicular to your face? With such a wide lens this is important to be fair...
Yan how do you feel about even if one of them sell ,they would still own some Chelsea assets they sold to themselves like the Hotels?🤔......don't know why but it feels like we're getting mugged here lol
that doesn't make any sense
@@altibzz they sold the hotels and training ground to blueco which also owns Chelsea but now Chelsea dnt own the own training ground so if blueco sell Chelsea they can do so with out training ground or make new owner pay more for the training ground
The room looks smaller
YAN. YES.
Not allowed to sell chelsea... what's all the shit about..??
💙
In my humble opinion,
I prefer the ownership of Eghbali over Boehly. clearlake have got a clear vision and have taken decisive steps towards how they want to run the club.
Firing of Tuchel and Hiring of Potter, that 1st window of Sterling and Auba were all had Boehly written all over it and it went pretty bad. Enzo Fernandez signing is also not helping us at all. Boehly had some vision but execution was missing.
Since Eghbali has gotten involved more, I'm able to see more methodical approach and execution is great. Maresca is a clever coach who will take time, but has a clear idea. Eghbali didnt let Osimhen dictate us the terms. Massive reduction of wage bill, all these have been steps towards executing Clearlake's vision. I believe the direction where we are going into and complete ownership of Clearlake will start to give us great results in near future.
Boehly wanted to run shit like they do with the Dodgers and sign elite players to win, Eghbali wanted the sign every player 22 and under strategy, he did it with the Dodgers, Within the first couple of months Boehly and his group made a mega trade for 3 all stars then signed a pitcher to a 150 mil contract and won a bidding war for the best Korean pitcher at the time AND started to put together the best farm system in baseball, pretty much every report said he was fine with Tuchel as well but Eghbali wanted him gone
We want a partnership between Todd and the Saudi
Stop messing with the tech and just tell us the story.
Also, whatever happened to the cat?