Sheikh assalamu alaikum. Can I ally with a people who betrayed the Khalifa by taking help from the brits? all I want is to spread “tawheed”. Is this permissible? Did Rasul (S) do such thing?
This comment shows that you did not watch this video, You saw the title and commented and left. And this is the characteristic of everyone that wants to takk bad about muhammad ibn abdulwahhab, They talk bad about him but never even read a sentence from his work. Your question is answered in the video 35-40 mins in roughly
Wa alakoom salam akhi, please don't repeat nonsense (that he was an ally of the British/took their help), which has no proof! Long ago, the poet said: وإذا الدعاوى لم تقم بدليلها بالنص فهي على السفاه دليل If claims are not supported by proof, they are used only by the fools as evidence. These claims have been refuted; please see the below link for more info (with sourced and verified statements): islamqa.info/en/answers/9243
@@ashekatmvlg they were a dawla and not a khilafah, Khilafah has its shuroot and if they are not met it cannot be a legitimate khilafah. Obviously it not being a khilafah doesnt make them bad in any way on the contrary they done alot for the ummah. But dont let your emotions over rule your intellect
@@AlbayanRadioAustralia Sheikh, the islamqa question was about sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab taking help from the Brits - and the answer is No. My Q was different. I am separating religious authority (Sheikh Mohammad) from political authority (the al saud). Hence, I asked: - did the al saud take help from the Brits to overthrow a muslim (could be mubtadi, hanafi, etc) ruler? (Yes/No)? - did the sheikh ally with al saud? (Yes/No)?
بارك الله فيكم مشايخنا الفضلاء
40:40 sheikh you said the ottoman were not a khilafa? Because they were not quraish?!! How brother
Sheikh assalamu alaikum. Can I ally with a people who betrayed the Khalifa by taking help from the brits? all I want is to spread “tawheed”. Is this permissible? Did Rasul (S) do such thing?
This comment shows that you did not watch this video,
You saw the title and commented and left.
And this is the characteristic of everyone that wants to takk bad about muhammad ibn abdulwahhab,
They talk bad about him but never even read a sentence from his work.
Your question is answered in the video 35-40 mins in roughly
@@abdul6785 the sheikh doesn’t even consider the Ottomans to be khilafah 😅
Wa alakoom salam akhi, please don't repeat nonsense (that he was an ally of the British/took their help), which has no proof! Long ago, the poet said:
وإذا الدعاوى لم تقم بدليلها بالنص فهي على السفاه دليل
If claims are not supported by proof, they are used only by the fools as evidence.
These claims have been refuted; please see the below link for more info (with sourced and verified statements): islamqa.info/en/answers/9243
@@ashekatmvlg they were a dawla and not a khilafah,
Khilafah has its shuroot and if they are not met it cannot be a legitimate khilafah.
Obviously it not being a khilafah doesnt make them bad in any way on the contrary they done alot for the ummah.
But dont let your emotions over rule your intellect
@@AlbayanRadioAustralia Sheikh, the islamqa question was about sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab taking help from the Brits - and the answer is No.
My Q was different. I am separating religious authority (Sheikh Mohammad) from political authority (the al saud). Hence, I asked:
- did the al saud take help from the Brits to overthrow a muslim (could be mubtadi, hanafi, etc) ruler? (Yes/No)?
- did the sheikh ally with al saud? (Yes/No)?