You do not win arms races. They are not winnable. Everyone loses at the end. How have we not learned this? Where battleships, aircraft, then atomic weapons!!! not enough? Eventually your enemy catches up to you. Better hope they are merciful...
@@OsirusHandle That could be said about most things that we interact with daily. The key is getting a better understanding of what major players are releasing (in terms of models, vertical market position, etc) so consumers and businesses can make informed decision on how they will engage (or choose not to) with AI as it stands today
@@TheAIGuysPodcast Yes, but usually these tools are of limited danger. AI as it is is still fairly weak, if still a great tool for scamming people (do you check who you are selling to? very few companies do. Wonder who sold these youtube Bot-hordes their software), but eventually its going to get to weapons tier danger, and I suspect within 2 decades. Gene editing tech too, which is even more dangerous. But competition rules. The issue is people sell sell sell with no care who they are selling to. Consider for example how almost all war-drones are manufactured by the same company in Shenzhen as all the civilian drones: Are civilians aware when they purchase these, they are supporting an amoral war profiteer? The company doesnt seem to care. Even using and normalising these technologies contributes in some way but as you correctly point out, this is true of most technologies.
Bobby, I just heard you say Teams is a great enterprise tool and I'm gonna need you to take that back.
He has gone corporate :)
@@TheAIGuysPodcast Pfff sellout
You do not win arms races. They are not winnable. Everyone loses at the end. How have we not learned this? Where battleships, aircraft, then atomic weapons!!! not enough?
Eventually your enemy catches up to you. Better hope they are merciful...
Its just a metaphor for A.I. 😊
@@TheAIGuysPodcast Is it though? Its still competition on a tool which can ruin everyones lives if abused.
@@OsirusHandle That could be said about most things that we interact with daily. The key is getting a better understanding of what major players are releasing (in terms of models, vertical market position, etc) so consumers and businesses can make informed decision on how they will engage (or choose not to) with AI as it stands today
@@TheAIGuysPodcast Yes, but usually these tools are of limited danger.
AI as it is is still fairly weak, if still a great tool for scamming people (do you check who you are selling to? very few companies do. Wonder who sold these youtube Bot-hordes their software), but eventually its going to get to weapons tier danger, and I suspect within 2 decades. Gene editing tech too, which is even more dangerous. But competition rules.
The issue is people sell sell sell with no care who they are selling to. Consider for example how almost all war-drones are manufactured by the same company in Shenzhen as all the civilian drones: Are civilians aware when they purchase these, they are supporting an amoral war profiteer? The company doesnt seem to care. Even using and normalising these technologies contributes in some way but as you correctly point out, this is true of most technologies.