I can explain the Aladdin one with a very simple reference: Genie's "provisos". According to him- #1: He can't kill anyone. #2: He can't make people fall in love. #3: He can't bring back the dead. #4: "Other than that, you've got it." So... Time travel... According to the Genie, that's within his capacity. And why does he make future pop culture references? Plain and simple, a being with no physical needs but who has been confined for ten thousand years would value, above all else (besides his freedom) entertainment. Ergo, if he's allowed to SEE all time periods but not ever experience them, the golden age of cinema and all points beyond it would be his favorite time periods. How does he know about Jack Nicholson? Probably because, during those ten thousand years, he peeked into the future and saw every single one of Jack's movies.
Khalon: I could disagree that the future is a uninhabitable planet (world wide dessert) because The genie must’ve been trapped in ether of the Year Letters, BC, or BCE
@@roxannecardwell3240 umm genie himself says he's been trapped for 10,000 years, and with the rate global warming is going- I have a high doubt that this isn't that far from our future
Genie says at the end of the movie “You won’t find another girl like her in a million year. Believe me. I know. I looked.” This proves that the Genie can at least see into the future.
I have a Aladdin theory. That the genie can actually bring people back from the dead. He says one of the rules is that he can't but then says "It's not a pretty picture, I DON'T LIKE DOING IT!" Which could mean he has in the past but was so disturbed that he lied that that was one of the rules so he never had to again
I think the implication is that he can bring them back from the dead, but only the body, per say, hence why he makes himself look like a zombie. Basically, he can SORT OF bring them back from the dead.
The Beast/Enchantress theory is not a truth bomb. It is stated in the film that the curse has to be broken by the Beast's 21st birthday, and 10 years have already passed by the time Belle arrives, according to "Be Our Guest". Therefore, Prince Adam would have to have been 10-11 years old by the time the curse started, which is not an age when most people are having that kind of relationship.
Actually the film states “the rose that she had offered was truly an enchanted rose which would bloom until his twenty first year. If he could learn to love another and earn her love in return by the time the last petal fell, the spell would be broken. If not the he would be doomed to remain a beast for all time.” (Beauty and the Beast, 1991). His twenty-first year doesn’t necessarily mean the beast’s twenty-first birthday. The theory that the beast was ten to eleven years old when he was cursed doesn’t really hold up when you look at the character Chip. Chip is at most eight to ten when during the events of the movie. The seen in which the curse is broken clearly shows that Chip is around this age range though his human form. If the beast really was ten to eleven when he was cursed, then Chip should either be a teenager or a young adult by the time Belle came to the castle or he was somehow born as a tea cup after curse was in place. Instead I believe that the curse prevents the Beast and the residents of the castle from aging. I think the line “the rose would bloom until the beast’s 21st year” is referring to the beast 21st year as the beast not beast’s 21st birthday. If the beast and residents of the castle were unable to age because of the curse, then twenty-one years could have passed by the Belle arrived. Lumiere's line in “Be Our Guest” “Ten years we’ve been rusting needing so much more than dusting” (Beauty and the Beast, 1991) could refer to the last time a guest, not including Belle’s father Maurice, had came to the castle. There are a couple of lines in movie that suggest that Belle and her father Maurice weren’t the first people to have stumbled upon the beast’s castle. Lumiere’s line “She’s the one, the girl we have been waiting for. She’s come to break the spell” (Beauty and the Beast, 1991) suggest several women could have come to the castle before Belle. Beast’s Line “So you’ve come to stare at the beast have you” (Beauty and the Beast, 1991) suggests that people had came to the castle before Maurice had stumbled upon it after he was attacked by wolves. So it isn’t too far fetched to say that Belle may not have been the Beast’s only attempt at breaking the spell. TLDR: The Film states “the rose that she had offered was truly an enchanted rose which would bloom until his twenty first year.” (Beauty and the Beast,1991). His 21st year doesn’t necessarily mean the beast’s 21st birthday. The theory that the beast was 10 to 11 doesn’t hold up, because chip would have either been teenager, young adult, or somehow born as a tea cup and not an eight to ten year old by the time the events of the movie take place. I believe that the curse actually prevents the beast the castle residents from aging. Lumiere’s line in “Be our Guest” may not be referring to how long they had been under the curse, how long it had been since they had Guest in the castle. Lumiere’s line about Belle being the one they had been waiting for, and beast’s line about Maurice coming to stare at the beast suggest that Maurice and Belle weren’t the first people to stumble upon the castle. These two lines also suggest that it is possible that several other women had been to the castle before Belle had arrived.
The gargoyles are most likely Clopins imagination actually. Since Clopin is the one telling the story in that movie and he telling it to children. The gargoyles were likely just there to connect with the kids.
@@vixiestarfire Yea it makes complete sense. The actual story is probably very similar, but without the gargoyles and Frollo probably fell off a broken statue, but it did not magically come alive.
I'm just glad that the Tarzan being related to Elsa and Anna theory is debunked. But that also means the Rapunzel being related to Elsa and Anna theory is false, too. Which really sucks to be honest.
The Enchantress being in love with the beast is disproven by the fact that he would be 11 when cursed. He's just now turning 21, ten years after he was cursed. And it's said when he turns 21 he'd become the best permanently.
I wouldn't read too deeply into The Beast Within. That story basically portrays Beast/PrinceAdam in the worst possible light, just like all those fanfictions that demonize Ron Weasley.
I'm gonna have to disagree. While he certainly was a prick before he got cursed in the book, based on what they say about his behavior up until that point and what we've seen him act like in supplementary material, said behavior is not inaccurate. It's only after the curse is placed on him that he goes full on abusive psycho which makes sense because it's pretty heavily implied the curse is worsening his absolute worst traits, i.e. his vanity, anger issues, and entitlement. He had all those things to begin with, regardless of canon, the curse just made those traits exceptionally terrible.
You mentioned Genie and the Peddler are the same because they're both voiced by Robin Williams and the way they both dress but how do you forget another obvious point: They're the only 2 human/humanoid characters in the WHOLE MOVIE to have 4 fingers (everyone else had 5)!
"Although the hyenas finished him off we didn't see a body" but didn't the hyenas eat him, bones and all? 🤔 I guess there are some people out there forgetting that part...
Esmeralda’s goat Djali in Hunchback acknowledges the gargoyles too. Although I supposed Quasimodo could’ve been imagining that too. What about the parts where the gargoyles fight some of the soldiers near the end of the film? I mean it could all be in his head I guess but other characters do interact with them
actually the theory about the gargoyles isn't far off, the scene where frollo dies, could actually be a figment of his own horrid last moments, when the flames hit the gargoyle, it can make things seem different in the lighting think of it as when its dark and you stare at a specific object for a set amount of time, the object will look misshapen, as the shade from the darkness cast over parts of the object then there's your own mind, as you stare at the object, it will begin to move, even though it hasn't moved an inch, your mind plays that trick on you and on itself the same thing could happen to frollo when he was hanging onto the gargoyle, if you noticed, frollo was staring at the statue for a fixed amount of time while the flames were setting off different red hues to it, making it easy to confuse the statue as a living gargoyle
I dunno, I still think it's alive merely because I think it's a lot more badass. He himself said "He shall smite the wicked, and plunge them into the firey pit forever!", and, assuming God even EXISTS in the Notre Dame world, He fulfilled the promise that Frollo put in his mouth, using a gargoyle to send him to a painful demise.
But, the theory was disproven by a clip they actually showed in the very video. Esmerelda’s goat does see the gargoyles. Why would the goat have a reason to hallucinate?
The Theory, about how a fly in the Emperor's New Groove was a human being once, is also not far off either; as Yzma is an alchemist who created potions to turn people into animals; she even thought of turning Kuzco into a flea before resorting to a deadly poison, which didn't work, because Kronk mixed up the potions. So, if she were to make a potion to turn Kuzco into a flea, who's to say she never tried it before, and that at one point she turned a human into a fly... but who? Well, to extend that theory, she used a potion on a Villager that previously was talking about the lack of food supply (off screen, on her way to the dark recesses of her lair, btw), and said fly was killed by the spider, never to become human again... very dark for a Disney movie, don't you think?
I’m surprised you never mentioned the theory of Scar eating Mufasa. Guess Film Theory debunked it so hard, it was not worth mentioning. Mat Pat also made a theory that Ariel and Hercules are related. What are your thoughts on that?
The last one is really not even even a theory, it's the truth. Based on mythology, Poseidon, and Triton, Ariel is 100% Hercules cousin. Now...that doesn't necessarily mean it's the SAME Hercules, cause we don't know for sure if the two movies are in the same universe with each other. But Ariel's definitely cousin to a version of Hercules at the very least.
Thanks for addressing the Peter Pan theory. I literally can’t say Peter is my favorite without anyone throwing the “Hook is the actual hero” theory at me.
With the Evil Queen and Mother Gothel being the same person theory, I'd say it should be a bit lower since the Tangled Animated Series kinda debunks the theory but if your only looking at the movie, then I'd agree but the backstory with Cass goes against it.
Well, in all fairness, we don't know exactly when Gothel started going after the Sundrop, but we know once she found it, she survived for many centuries. Given she at one point teamed with Zhan Tiri, who is confirmed to be over a thousand years old, the theory is still possible. The only parts of her backstory we know for sure are that she was allied with Zhan Tiri before finding the Sundrop, but likely wasn't keen on getting her back, and only had Cassandra 4 years before Rapunzel was born. What she did in between Zhan Tiri's banishment and finding the Sundrop is pretty much unknown. Assuming the Evil Queen didn't die, it's still possible that they're one in the same and when she supposedly died, she began to search for the Sundrop once more to regain her youth and beauty and found it just before the self-inflicted premature aging could do her in. The only hole I can think of is the Queen's death scene, where she falls from a considerable height with a boulder also falling in her direction, followed by vultures flying overhead. Still, better than the theory that Meg is Gothel.
It doesn't matter if we were explicitly shown the cy-bug merging with Brad Scott (that's Calhoun's fiance's name from her backstory) onscreen or not, we know from the mentioned cy-bug knowledge that that's what would've been happening as Calhoun was shooting at the bug with that horrified expression on her face (and right before we see her face, the bug rears up and shrieks the same way the one in Sugar Rush does before it transforms into the candy root it eats, at the end of the Laffy Taffy scene). It's a cutaway for the sake of horror. The implication is that having to mercy-kill him (or the bug that would become "him") is the worst thing she's ever had to do/see even in all her years of being a hardened, grizzled veteran. We don't see the process of Turbo melding with the bug either, we just see the aftermath. Given how Wreck-It Ralph is a well-put-together movie that doesn't waste any details, it's a safe bet that the writers were deliberately hinting at Tamora Calhoun being forced to kill Brad, in some way or another. It doesn't have to be spelled out for the audience since this is a film for everyone, it's not like it's a preschool movie.
What about the Christmas special, it shows the beats as a child meeting the enchantress, for the first time, and getting cursed. Even if they were in love, the beast was like 12... that is all kinds of uncomfortable
But in "Be our Guest" Lumiere says it's been ten years and the narrator set up that Adam would have to break the curse before his twenty first year. By that math he was eleven when he was cursed. ETA: Lion King is set in Africa. Hercules is in Ancient Greece. All the tasks Hercules had to do never took him away from the Greek world of that time period. They can't co-exist because they're entire continents apart.
Though there may be a book that indicates the Enchantress and the Beast were in love before, I want to know the age of the Enchantress at the time. Because Prince Adam should have only been 11. That could cause some … problems. Also, the existence of the Princesses in Ralph Breaks the Internet does not undermine the theory. Those princesses exist solely on the Internet, and they were likely digital creations. This means that someone likely referenced their tales when building their Internet personas.
My friend had a theory that in the first Wreck It Ralph, Turbo actually survived. The reason being that his death happened before the game data was reset, and he was registered as King Candy at the time. It's also possible that his actual death happened when he got eaten, and the bug just assumed his form, while the real King Candy respawned elsewhere.
@@alr3764 Yeah, but he hacked the game data, to make himself part of the Sugar Rush game, and died before the data was reset. So, as far as the game knew, he was in his own game.
there's also the fact that Hercules and Ariel from The Little Mermaid are related. for that, here is context. the titans, Chronos and Rea had a set of children who overthrew the tians two of which are Zeus and Poseidon. Zeus and Hera had Hercules while Poseidon and his wife had Triton who with the late Athena had Ariel. in this context, Hercules and Ariel would be cousins and this was made into light by the Film Theorists.
The Beast, Enchantress one makes no sense. Beast has to break the cures by his 21st birthday or its permanent, but in "Be Our Guest" where the characters sing "10 years we've been rusting, needing so much more than dusting" so do the math and Beast is 11 when he's cursed. He's a brat cursed by an adult, can't see a ten year old dating an adult woman
In The Beast Within book ( about Prince Adam ) actually states that a witch named Circe & the beast were a couple. At one point to test his love Circe dressed up as a pig farmer or something related to that & when the beast saw her in dirty messy clothes he rejected & broke her heart & that's when Circe gave him the curse with the help of her sisters
I like the think of the Beast Within as a same canon but different continuity deal. The book uses different names and is a retelling of the story years later. I like to think that this was meant as an alternate, reimagined version of the story, given that it directly contradicts the movie.
11:27 that theory is full of holes. How could The Evil Queen have survived falling from a hundred feet AND getting crushed by a boulder? If she survived THAT, the vultures would have finished her off.
@Will N she used a book. if she forgets a specific spell or messes it up, she's toast. we know she doesn't have the book because either she didn't bring it or it would of dropped on the way down. highly doubt the queen is surviving it without that
@Will N pretty sure the two movies are in different eras. Also, Gaston fell to his death and it was ruled out he died because of the skulls in his pupils. Clayton hung himself by not listening to Tarzan. Charles muntz jumped out from the house in up and fell to his death with no real way to survive. Syndrome died by having his cape getting caught in the jet turbine. So having the good guys cause their deaths isn't valid here. especially when the good guy doesn't mean for them to die in such manner.
there's one thing that don't sit with me if snow white's prince is death, than why did he bring her back to life, he's not death he's god and he brought her to his kingdom.
If Tangled and Frozen are supposed to take place 60 years apart, then why does Rapunzel and Eugene (in Frozen) look like they haven't aged a single day after the events of Tangled? I think Disney might've created a plot hole, if these two movies are supposed to take place 60 years apart.
Hi I love your videos, especially the good to evil ones. Could you please make a battle kitty good to evil one? Thank you, my name is Rowan and I’m aged 8, from England 😊
Tbf, the Wreck It Ralph princesses are basically the face of the internet versions of themselves, and might have several fan-additions (example: princess Cinderella would never have broken the slipper...)
I wonder if WickedBinge has ever seen ChickenHare and the Hamster of Darkness, if they ever have, then I think I would like to see Chickenhare Characters, good to evil.
There's also a theory that the shipwreck from Frozen is the one that Ariel swims through in The Little mermaid but that's b******* because of the part of the planet that crashed on
Okay. Excuse me while I rant. Every time people throw the “Hook is the real hero,” they claim that it is in the original book/play that Peter is a killer of children and Hook tries to save them. The thing is, I own the book and have read it and… NO WHERE IN THERE DOES IT SAY THAT! NOR IS IT EVEN IMPLIED! Sure, Peter may represent an angel of death guiding the dying inner child to their ideal heaven before they have to grow up and leave their fading childhood behind, but he is not supposed to be a killer. Saying that it’s in the book was someone relying on the fact that most people wouldn’t care to read classic literature and saying “trust me bro.” Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.
would love anna & elsa befriending rapunzel(would also make a good tie if the parents went to the kingdom hearing the events of tangled especially the flower that gave rapunzel her power to try and cure elsa.). with how man was in concepts shown burned to death/implied it's the same one the deaths also are a big difference. do love the idea of the disney series being a world with different time periods/worlds for others(wreck it ralph 2 also breaks the rules of it's own world with how it ends.) as there was the lilo & stitch tv series having other disney channel series in it with nothing from the creators confirming it isn't canon with how experiments show up in them(meaning alongside aliens there is dragons,mystical items and futuristic tech outside jumbaa/the galactic forces technology in lilo & stitch.). that would've been creepy if calhoun didn't kill that cy bug before it fully assimilated her husband. don't really see anything post apocalyptic(outside parts of the tv series with how many ancient destroyers there were/hints of the sultans dark past.) as genie is a phenomenally cosmic powerful genie wouldn't be hard to imagine he could just go to any time period he wanted after he was freed/being all knowing. wouldn't outright say captain hook's a hero as he tries to kill children but is definitely sympathetic with how messed up peter is. hercules didn't kill scar as he was in shadow shown to be eaten by the hyena's/engulfed by the flames even if he survived the hyena's getting their fill,moreso it's a reference to the skin he wore in the myths.(though with how the lion king could take place in any time period with how no humans show up could take place around hercules time with a trader finding scars corpse.) do like doug walker thoughts about it/the plays going with the gargoyles being quasi's imagination showing a somewhat depressing dive into his imagination finding comfort especially.(odd the archdeacon doesn't interact that much with quasimodo other than busy with his duty/being kept away by frollo.) the prince was around 10-11 even in that time that wouldn't be romance age,if anything the enchantress being evil is more fitting with how the servants got punished as well for that act/didn't do anything about gaston especially in the remake letting him die. the genie being revealed as the peddler was already confirmed by a deleted scene.(do like in king of thieves they kept him around implying he told the story of not only the movies but also the tv series/genie not being in the same scene.)
I’m pretty dang late to the party, but the “Hook is a Hero” theory is actually kind of true! In the original story, Peter Pan would kill the pirates for fun and with little to no remorse. He would also off the lost boys when they got too old (they still age- Pan is the only one who doesn’t). The pirates (minus Hook) are the lost boys that got out alive. Hook might be trying to rescue them from the fate they will eventually face.
Total Drama All Generations: Dumb to Brilliant and Weak to Powerful Total Drama Heroes: Dumb to Brilliant and Weak to Powerful Total Drama Villains: Dumb to Brilliant and Weak to Powerful Total Drama Seasons: Worst to Best Total Drama: World Tour, All Stars, and Pahkitew Island challenges: Gruesome to most Gruesome Total Drama All Seasons Challenges: Dumb to Brilliant Total Drama Plotholes: Smallest to Biggest Chris McLean Deeds: Good to Evil Fillmore, American Dragon: Jake Long, Doug, ChalkZone, Rocko's Modern Life, Aaahh Real Monsters, The Penguins of Madagascar, Ben 10, Stoked, 6teen, Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go, CatDog, Jimmy Two Shoes, Daria, My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic, Lilo and Stitch Experiments, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (87 + 03), Legends of Chamberlain Heights, Over the Hedge, Drawn Together, iCarly, Victorious, Open Season, and Total Dramarama: Good to Evil
I have not read the Beast Within yet but that theory bothers me. Reason being there is a line in Be Our Guest that says “ 10 years we’ve been rusting needing so much more than dusting,” I had always thought that Prince Adam was 11 when he was cursed meaning that he’d be in his 20s when the spell is broken. Therefore the s Enchantress and Prince Adam could not even have had a relationship. I have heard another theory that Prince Adam and Mrs. Potts could have had Chip together but I don’t think that makes sense either.
Can you do Wallace & Gromit: Good to evil? Most good: Gromit Good (silver): Shaun the Sheep Good (bronze): Wallace Grey area: Cooker Evil (bronze): Feathers McGraw or Lord Victor Quartermaine Evil (silver): Preston Most evil: Piella Bakewell
I got one for ya The original Goofy, AKA Dippy Dog, is actually Max's grandfather In the silver age of Goofy shorts, Goofy has a son named Junior, making said son Goofy Jr. The Goofy in the 1990s and early 2000s would be about the right age to be a kid then AND have a kid of his own Now I will admit there is a key flaw in this: the other golden and silver age characters also being in the 1990s and early 2000s
Can you do this format on other channels? I already thought of one for 1upbinge. Mario theories: B.S. to truthbomb BS: Peach is Bowser jr's mother Possible: Mario is a psycopath Truthbomb: Mario and his friends are actors I would love to see it on more channels. Not just this one.
The end of the sequel film debunks the hunchback theory in my opinion. Not to mention in 13:00 why did the goat react like that if the gargoyle was imaginary, and if that was the case and they weren't doing the things they did in the final battle, then who was?
So ik the "Enchantress was in love with the beast theory" was proven by the book. But the beast was 10 when he was cursed and the woman looked 21-25 at least.
Well, with the Hunchback gargoyle theory, there is one piece of evidence that does go against it, but it's from a source that people prefer to forget. In Hunchback 2, Madellaine actually reacts to the gargoyles being alive from time to time, and at the end, she responds to their hope that she'll take care of Quasimodo, causing them to lose their jaws in shock that not only had she heard them, but she saw them in their sentient state, making that theory fall flat on its face. That and Esmeralda's goat seeing them alive being a running gag. Given this movie is often overlooked, disregarded, and forgotten due to being one of the many disappointing Disney sequels, it's understandable this wouldn't be taken into account at first.
Now do Which Family Guy Character Would Most Likely Win Squid Game, Which Nickelodeon Villains Would Most Likely Win Squid Game, Which Cartoon Network Protagonist Would Most Likely Win Squid Game, Which Disenchantment Character Would Most Likely Win Squid Game, Which Cartoon Network Protagonists/Antagonists Would Make The Best Heist Crew!
Hercules couldn't have killed Scar. Scar was eaten alive and burned, nothing would have been left of him. Also, why would Hercules travel from Greece to the African Savanna to kill a small, weak, and old lion?
Ok, the Snow White one actually getting a true love's kiss is not exactly confirmed, while it.did say that true love's kiss will break the spell, who knows that the Prince is actually Snow White's true love? After all, they only met for a few seconds. That is something to consider. Also the debunking theories like the Tangled and Frozen one is not necessarily effective since Disney movies are known to be historically inaccurate. Like in Mulan and Aladdin the fireworks were colorful, when in both times it should have taken place, it should have been just grey.
Yeah you have a Point though Frozen and Tangled do Take Place in Different Times but Let's not Forget that This is a Movie so Anything is Possible in the World of Cartoons and Superheroes like even Aladdin and Hercules Take Place in Different Times and they Teamead up with each other
The Aladdin theory isn't totally out of the question because at the beginning of the movie, we see the caravan guy carrying a Plastic Container which plastic is man made and its earliest appearance is 1907
Here's the problem though: Considering that the timeline of Beauty and the Beast suggests the prince was ten or eleven when he was cursed, that would mean that if the enchantress was in love with him, than that would make her a pedophile, meaning that he had every right to be disturbed by her presence and turn her away, making him 100% innocent for protecting himself from her.
Tbf we don’t know how old the enchantress is. Oh sure, she definitely disguises herself as an old woman, but that was just that. A disguise. She could’ve been a child too for all we know. In fact, if she was, her actions would make all the more sense. A child throwing a tantrum when they don’t get what they want.
You should do nfl rush zone characters good to evil the vampires diaries characters good to evil The Originals characters good to evil Tales of aracdia characters good to evil in three separate video Threat levels: harmless to Dangerous
"Disney is protective of their characters". Really because technically they didn't even create most of them. Hercules is from Roman mythology (Heracles is the Greek version), every fairy tale they've done has already existed for at least a 100 years if not longer, when a character was uniquely created Disney just buys the rights (like they did with Star Wars).
Honestly, I don't really see a connection between Scar and Hercules' stories. I feel like it was just an easter egg kind of moment.... Then again, most fan theories don't really phase me as I find them to be a bit weird in general.
I can only imagine that Walt Disney himself would've debunked that Snow White theory in a snap. But for some reason, I still believe Gaston is the killer of Bambi's mom. From my point of the genie, the 10,000 years was only exaggeration and could perhaps have the power to look into future times for inspiration becomings.
8:00 The genie is silly, he's prolly exaggerating Or the lamp has accelerated time 10:20 Likelier that the Nemean lion is a distant cousin or ancestor lion But if it *was* true? Think about how that scales the Lion King relative to Hercules' size
Snow White though that theory I mean I've also heard that in her mind that Apple was actually 100% magic because she took a bite she basically closed her eyes and when she opened them she was getting the kiss of true love so it was magic she didn't know that she had quote unquote died or anything
There's actually a theory that Hercules is actually related to Ariel too because of in the mythology their fathers are distant relatives are not distant relatives I guess like her grandfather is his father's brother or some s*** so I don't know there's some level of cousins who probably wouldn't know each other
I can explain the Aladdin one with a very simple reference: Genie's "provisos". According to him-
#1: He can't kill anyone.
#2: He can't make people fall in love.
#3: He can't bring back the dead.
#4: "Other than that, you've got it."
So... Time travel... According to the Genie, that's within his capacity.
And why does he make future pop culture references? Plain and simple, a being with no physical needs but who has been confined for ten thousand years would value, above all else (besides his freedom) entertainment. Ergo, if he's allowed to SEE all time periods but not ever experience them, the golden age of cinema and all points beyond it would be his favorite time periods.
How does he know about Jack Nicholson? Probably because, during those ten thousand years, he peeked into the future and saw every single one of Jack's movies.
This is a very good explanation.
Wait so you can wish for more wishes
@@hadesmapping8654 no
Khalon: I could disagree that the future is a uninhabitable planet (world wide dessert) because The genie must’ve been trapped in ether of the Year Letters, BC, or BCE
@@roxannecardwell3240 umm genie himself says he's been trapped for 10,000 years, and with the rate global warming is going- I have a high doubt that this isn't that far from our future
hercules didn't kill scar, it was a reference to the nemean lion skin heracles wears in the myth, they just made it look like scar for an easter egg
Hi I know it might not be related to the video but I would like to see if Danganrompa characters in Squid games.
Yes, remember, in the films, Scar is dogpiled and eaten by hungry hyenas. That wouldn't leave any skin behind for Hercules to make a cloak with.
plus the hyenas were the ones to end scars life
Heracles
I don’t buy it. It was a reference to one of 12 Labors and the scar was just a coincidence.
"We can't say in good faith gaston's a murderer"
Also gaston's last attempt to marry bell: *Tried to FREAKING MURDER BEAST*
Genie says at the end of the movie “You won’t find another girl like her in a million year. Believe me. I know. I looked.” This proves that the Genie can at least see into the future.
@jf k or he looked for aladdin sum dese be outta hand ngl
Also, the Pedler and Genie being the same character was made canon in the Will Smith live action remake.
I have a Aladdin theory. That the genie can actually bring people back from the dead.
He says one of the rules is that he can't but then says "It's not a pretty picture, I DON'T LIKE DOING IT!" Which could mean he has in the past but was so disturbed that he lied that that was one of the rules so he never had to again
Maybe not so much that he lied, but he MADE it a rule because of the fact he didn't like it.
Well either way, it’s no longer necessary to bring someone from the dead
The old saying, “be careful what you wish for.”
I think the implication is that he can bring them back from the dead, but only the body, per say, hence why he makes himself look like a zombie. Basically, he can SORT OF bring them back from the dead.
@@TayoEXE Which is probably the reason he made it a rule.
The Beast/Enchantress theory is not a truth bomb. It is stated in the film that the curse has to be broken by the Beast's 21st birthday, and 10 years have already passed by the time Belle arrives, according to "Be Our Guest". Therefore, Prince Adam would have to have been 10-11 years old by the time the curse started, which is not an age when most people are having that kind of relationship.
Actually, there were cases where those relationships actually happened in the past
Well….no. 😝Richard II of England married Isabella of France. 😌She was six. 😝He was twenty-nine.😝
Actually the film states “the rose that she had offered was truly an enchanted rose which would bloom until his twenty first year. If he could learn to love another and earn her love in return by the time the last petal fell, the spell would be broken. If not the he would be doomed to remain a beast for all time.” (Beauty and the Beast, 1991). His twenty-first year doesn’t necessarily mean the beast’s twenty-first birthday. The theory that the beast was ten to eleven years old when he was cursed doesn’t really hold up when you look at the character Chip. Chip is at most eight to ten when during the events of the movie. The seen in which the curse is broken clearly shows that Chip is around this age range though his human form. If the beast really was ten to eleven when he was cursed, then Chip should either be a teenager or a young adult by the time Belle came to the castle or he was somehow born as a tea cup after curse was in place. Instead I believe that the curse prevents the Beast and the residents of the castle from aging. I think the line “the rose would bloom until the beast’s 21st year” is referring to the beast 21st year as the beast not beast’s 21st birthday. If the beast and residents of the castle were unable to age because of the curse, then twenty-one years could have passed by the Belle arrived. Lumiere's line in “Be Our Guest” “Ten years we’ve been rusting needing so much more than dusting” (Beauty and the Beast, 1991) could refer to the last time a guest, not including Belle’s father Maurice, had came to the castle. There are a couple of lines in movie that suggest that Belle and her father Maurice weren’t the first people to have stumbled upon the beast’s castle. Lumiere’s line “She’s the one, the girl we have been waiting for. She’s come to break the spell” (Beauty and the Beast, 1991) suggest several women could have come to the castle before Belle. Beast’s Line “So you’ve come to stare at the beast have you” (Beauty and the Beast, 1991) suggests that people had came to the castle before Maurice had stumbled upon it after he was attacked by wolves. So it isn’t too far fetched to say that Belle may not have been the Beast’s only attempt at breaking the spell.
TLDR: The Film states “the rose that she had offered was truly an enchanted rose which would bloom until his twenty first year.” (Beauty and the Beast,1991). His 21st year doesn’t necessarily mean the beast’s 21st birthday. The theory that the beast was 10 to 11 doesn’t hold up, because chip would have either been teenager, young adult, or somehow born as a tea cup and not an eight to ten year old by the time the events of the movie take place. I believe that the curse actually prevents the beast the castle residents from aging. Lumiere’s line in “Be our Guest” may not be referring to how long they had been under the curse, how long it had been since they had Guest in the castle. Lumiere’s line about Belle being the one they had been waiting for, and beast’s line about Maurice coming to stare at the beast suggest that Maurice and Belle weren’t the first people to stumble upon the castle. These two lines also suggest that it is possible that several other women had been to the castle before Belle had arrived.
The gargoyles are most likely Clopins imagination actually. Since Clopin is the one telling the story in that movie and he telling it to children. The gargoyles were likely just there to connect with the kids.
I really like that actually
@@vixiestarfire Yea it makes complete sense. The actual story is probably very similar, but without the gargoyles and Frollo probably fell off a broken statue, but it did not magically come alive.
I'm just glad that the Tarzan being related to Elsa and Anna theory is debunked. But that also means the Rapunzel being related to Elsa and Anna theory is false, too. Which really sucks to be honest.
The Enchantress being in love with the beast is disproven by the fact that he would be 11 when cursed. He's just now turning 21, ten years after he was cursed. And it's said when he turns 21 he'd become the best permanently.
Aladdin director’s agreement is the reason they put will smith’s genie as a story telling mariner in 2019 remake
I wouldn't read too deeply into The Beast Within. That story basically portrays Beast/PrinceAdam in the worst possible light, just like all those fanfictions that demonize Ron Weasley.
Or the movies making Ron a joke and blubbering cowardly idiot
Also the movie itself completely debunks it. Unless, of course, the enchantress was a child.
I'm gonna have to disagree. While he certainly was a prick before he got cursed in the book, based on what they say about his behavior up until that point and what we've seen him act like in supplementary material, said behavior is not inaccurate. It's only after the curse is placed on him that he goes full on abusive psycho which makes sense because it's pretty heavily implied the curse is worsening his absolute worst traits, i.e. his vanity, anger issues, and entitlement. He had all those things to begin with, regardless of canon, the curse just made those traits exceptionally terrible.
The hunchback of Notre dame had two issues: first, the Esmeralda's goat saw them and the circus girl in the second movie
But confirmed that Rapunzel was in Frozen! Even Olaf called her "my close friend" in one of the shorts on Disney Plus
You mentioned Genie and the Peddler are the same because they're both voiced by Robin Williams and the way they both dress but how do you forget another obvious point: They're the only 2 human/humanoid characters in the WHOLE MOVIE to have 4 fingers (everyone else had 5)!
The enchantress being in love with beast kinda creeps me out as wasn't the beast supposed to be a kid when he got cursed
One thing people overlook about the Aladdin theory is during A Whole New World we see the Sphinx being built.
"Although the hyenas finished him off we didn't see a body" but didn't the hyenas eat him, bones and all? 🤔 I guess there are some people out there forgetting that part...
Yeah hyenas eat the whole body, especially bones
Esmeralda’s goat Djali in Hunchback acknowledges the gargoyles too. Although I supposed Quasimodo could’ve been imagining that too. What about the parts where the gargoyles fight some of the soldiers near the end of the film? I mean it could all be in his head I guess but other characters do interact with them
actually the theory about the gargoyles isn't far off, the scene where frollo dies, could actually be a figment of his own horrid last moments,
when the flames hit the gargoyle, it can make things seem different in the lighting
think of it as when its dark and you stare at a specific object for a set amount of time, the object will look misshapen, as the shade from the darkness cast over parts of the object
then there's your own mind, as you stare at the object, it will begin to move, even though it hasn't moved an inch, your mind plays that trick on you and on itself
the same thing could happen to frollo when he was hanging onto the gargoyle, if you noticed, frollo was staring at the statue for a fixed amount of time while the flames were setting off different red hues to it, making it easy to confuse the statue as a living gargoyle
I dunno, I still think it's alive merely because I think it's a lot more badass. He himself said "He shall smite the wicked, and plunge them into the firey pit forever!", and, assuming God even EXISTS in the Notre Dame world, He fulfilled the promise that Frollo put in his mouth, using a gargoyle to send him to a painful demise.
Basically a mix of Pareidolia and Symbolism.
But, the theory was disproven by a clip they actually showed in the very video. Esmerelda’s goat does see the gargoyles. Why would the goat have a reason to hallucinate?
The Theory, about how a fly in the Emperor's New Groove was a human being once, is also not far off either; as Yzma is an alchemist who created potions to turn people into animals; she even thought of turning Kuzco into a flea before resorting to a deadly poison, which didn't work, because Kronk mixed up the potions. So, if she were to make a potion to turn Kuzco into a flea, who's to say she never tried it before, and that at one point she turned a human into a fly... but who? Well, to extend that theory, she used a potion on a Villager that previously was talking about the lack of food supply (off screen, on her way to the dark recesses of her lair, btw), and said fly was killed by the spider, never to become human again... very dark for a Disney movie, don't you think?
I’m surprised you never mentioned the theory of Scar eating Mufasa. Guess Film Theory debunked it so hard, it was not worth mentioning. Mat Pat also made a theory that Ariel and Hercules are related. What are your thoughts on that?
The last one is really not even even a theory, it's the truth. Based on mythology, Poseidon, and Triton, Ariel is 100% Hercules cousin. Now...that doesn't necessarily mean it's the SAME Hercules, cause we don't know for sure if the two movies are in the same universe with each other. But Ariel's definitely cousin to a version of Hercules at the very least.
Never mention MatPat again!
Thanks for addressing the Peter Pan theory. I literally can’t say Peter is my favorite without anyone throwing the “Hook is the actual hero” theory at me.
With the Evil Queen and Mother Gothel being the same person theory, I'd say it should be a bit lower since the Tangled Animated Series kinda debunks the theory but if your only looking at the movie, then I'd agree but the backstory with Cass goes against it.
Well, in all fairness, we don't know exactly when Gothel started going after the Sundrop, but we know once she found it, she survived for many centuries. Given she at one point teamed with Zhan Tiri, who is confirmed to be over a thousand years old, the theory is still possible. The only parts of her backstory we know for sure are that she was allied with Zhan Tiri before finding the Sundrop, but likely wasn't keen on getting her back, and only had Cassandra 4 years before Rapunzel was born. What she did in between Zhan Tiri's banishment and finding the Sundrop is pretty much unknown. Assuming the Evil Queen didn't die, it's still possible that they're one in the same and when she supposedly died, she began to search for the Sundrop once more to regain her youth and beauty and found it just before the self-inflicted premature aging could do her in.
The only hole I can think of is the Queen's death scene, where she falls from a considerable height with a boulder also falling in her direction, followed by vultures flying overhead. Still, better than the theory that Meg is Gothel.
@@lycanthis9963 I guess I stand corrected then, but the show is pretty confusing in its self so that was the main reason for me
It doesn't matter if we were explicitly shown the cy-bug merging with Brad Scott (that's Calhoun's fiance's name from her backstory) onscreen or not, we know from the mentioned cy-bug knowledge that that's what would've been happening as Calhoun was shooting at the bug with that horrified expression on her face (and right before we see her face, the bug rears up and shrieks the same way the one in Sugar Rush does before it transforms into the candy root it eats, at the end of the Laffy Taffy scene). It's a cutaway for the sake of horror. The implication is that having to mercy-kill him (or the bug that would become "him") is the worst thing she's ever had to do/see even in all her years of being a hardened, grizzled veteran.
We don't see the process of Turbo melding with the bug either, we just see the aftermath. Given how Wreck-It Ralph is a well-put-together movie that doesn't waste any details, it's a safe bet that the writers were deliberately hinting at Tamora Calhoun being forced to kill Brad, in some way or another. It doesn't have to be spelled out for the audience since this is a film for everyone, it's not like it's a preschool movie.
What about the Christmas special, it shows the beats as a child meeting the enchantress, for the first time, and getting cursed. Even if they were in love, the beast was like 12... that is all kinds of uncomfortable
If the Enchantress was in love with the Beast, he was 11 at the time. That's creepy
But in "Be our Guest" Lumiere says it's been ten years and the narrator set up that Adam would have to break the curse before his twenty first year. By that math he was eleven when he was cursed.
ETA: Lion King is set in Africa. Hercules is in Ancient Greece. All the tasks Hercules had to do never took him away from the Greek world of that time period. They can't co-exist because they're entire continents apart.
Though there may be a book that indicates the Enchantress and the Beast were in love before, I want to know the age of the Enchantress at the time. Because Prince Adam should have only been 11. That could cause some … problems.
Also, the existence of the Princesses in Ralph Breaks the Internet does not undermine the theory. Those princesses exist solely on the Internet, and they were likely digital creations. This means that someone likely referenced their tales when building their Internet personas.
My friend had a theory that in the first Wreck It Ralph, Turbo actually survived. The reason being that his death happened before the game data was reset, and he was registered as King Candy at the time. It's also possible that his actual death happened when he got eaten, and the bug just assumed his form, while the real King Candy respawned elsewhere.
but he died outside his game
@@alr3764 Yeah, but he hacked the game data, to make himself part of the Sugar Rush game, and died before the data was reset. So, as far as the game knew, he was in his own game.
there's also the fact that Hercules and Ariel from The Little Mermaid are related. for that, here is context. the titans, Chronos and Rea had a set of children who overthrew the tians two of which are Zeus and Poseidon. Zeus and Hera had Hercules while Poseidon and his wife had Triton who with the late Athena had Ariel. in this context, Hercules and Ariel would be cousins and this was made into light by the Film Theorists.
Makes sense….🤔
The Beast, Enchantress one makes no sense. Beast has to break the cures by his 21st birthday or its permanent, but in "Be Our Guest" where the characters sing "10 years we've been rusting, needing so much more than dusting" so do the math and Beast is 11 when he's cursed. He's a brat cursed by an adult, can't see a ten year old dating an adult woman
Cuphead season 2 characters: good to evil
Yes
Darwin and sloth-Cuphead
Gluttony-Baroness von Bon Bon
Envy-mugman
Greed-Werner werman
Pride-Ludwig
Wrath-the Devil
Lust-captain Brineybeard
Hi I know it might not be related to the video but I would like to see if Danganrompa characters in Squid games.
Huh, I thought the Peddler one was fairly obvious. Genie retelling the story, etc.
13:31 I think in the play the Hunchback of Notre Dame the Gargoyles literally ARE figments of Quasi's imagination/loneliness.
Can you do 'The Dragon Prince' Characters: Good to Evil please?
Good: Rayla
Neutral: Soren
Evil: Viern
In The Beast Within book ( about Prince Adam ) actually states that a witch named Circe & the beast were a couple. At one point to test his love Circe dressed up as a pig farmer or something related to that & when the beast saw her in dirty messy clothes he rejected & broke her heart & that's when Circe gave him the curse with the help of her sisters
I like the think of the Beast Within as a same canon but different continuity deal. The book uses different names and is a retelling of the story years later. I like to think that this was meant as an alternate, reimagined version of the story, given that it directly contradicts the movie.
11:27 that theory is full of holes. How could The Evil Queen have survived falling from a hundred feet AND getting crushed by a boulder? If she survived THAT, the vultures would have finished her off.
Facts.
Good point.
@Will N she used a book. if she forgets a specific spell or messes it up, she's toast. we know she doesn't have the book because either she didn't bring it or it would of dropped on the way down. highly doubt the queen is surviving it without that
@Will N pretty sure the two movies are in different eras. Also, Gaston fell to his death and it was ruled out he died because of the skulls in his pupils. Clayton hung himself by not listening to Tarzan. Charles muntz jumped out from the house in up and fell to his death with no real way to survive. Syndrome died by having his cape getting caught in the jet turbine. So having the good guys cause their deaths isn't valid here. especially when the good guy doesn't mean for them to die in such manner.
@Will N if that was the case why didn't he revive the others I mentioned?
I knew the Peddler was also the Genie the whole time. I knew it!
Stranger Things (Season 4) Good to evil
Good: Max Mayfield or Eddie Munson
Grey: Murray Bauman or Dr Alexei
Evil: Vecna
Also, Maui's wife is called Hina, not Sina. Spelling is important when you're researching myths, people.
there's one thing that don't sit with me if snow white's prince is death, than why did he bring her back to life, he's not death he's god and he brought her to his kingdom.
@@viviennemorgan7217 That's a much nicer theory
@@finnover9781 yep.
If Tangled and Frozen are supposed to take place 60 years apart, then why does Rapunzel and Eugene (in Frozen) look like they haven't aged a single day after the events of Tangled? I think Disney might've created a plot hole, if these two movies are supposed to take place 60 years apart.
tangled actually takes place in the early 1800s, making the theory perfect
Could you do a "B.S. to Truth Bomb" episode on Harry Potter? There are Sooo many wild theories that would be great to cover!
One theory that I came up with myself is that all the animated animal movies take place on one large timeline
Hey, I really love your videos! 🖤💙❤️
Hi I love your videos, especially the good to evil ones. Could you please make a battle kitty good to evil one? Thank you, my name is Rowan and I’m aged 8, from England 😊
On top of being blue, and being voiced by Robin Williams, the genie and the peddler are the only two characters in the movie with four fingers.
Tbf, the Wreck It Ralph princesses are basically the face of the internet versions of themselves, and might have several fan-additions (example: princess Cinderella would never have broken the slipper...)
Do Stranger Things Characters: Dumb to Brilliant!
They should make stranger things characters: good to evil and weak to powerfull (wich would be beter than the other one) first.
@@darkplayer237
They already did the good to evil list.
I wonder if WickedBinge has ever seen ChickenHare and the Hamster of Darkness, if they ever have, then I think I would like to see Chickenhare Characters, good to evil.
There's also a theory that the shipwreck from Frozen is the one that Ariel swims through in The Little mermaid but that's b******* because of the part of the planet that crashed on
Okay. Excuse me while I rant. Every time people throw the “Hook is the real hero,” they claim that it is in the original book/play that Peter is a killer of children and Hook tries to save them. The thing is, I own the book and have read it and… NO WHERE IN THERE DOES IT SAY THAT! NOR IS IT EVEN IMPLIED! Sure, Peter may represent an angel of death guiding the dying inner child to their ideal heaven before they have to grow up and leave their fading childhood behind, but he is not supposed to be a killer. Saying that it’s in the book was someone relying on the fact that most people wouldn’t care to read classic literature and saying “trust me bro.”
Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.
Amphibia and The Owl House Characters: Good to Evil, Dumb to Brilliant and Weak to Powerful.
Actually "Tangled" takes place in the 1830s and you are right about "Frozen" it did take place in the 1840s but still
would love anna & elsa befriending rapunzel(would also make a good tie if the parents went to the kingdom hearing the events of tangled especially the flower that gave rapunzel her power to try and cure elsa.).
with how man was in concepts shown burned to death/implied it's the same one the deaths also are a big difference.
do love the idea of the disney series being a world with different time periods/worlds for others(wreck it ralph 2 also breaks the rules of it's own world with how it ends.) as there was the lilo & stitch tv series having other disney channel series in it with nothing from the creators confirming it isn't canon with how experiments show up in them(meaning alongside aliens there is dragons,mystical items and futuristic tech outside jumbaa/the galactic forces technology in lilo & stitch.).
that would've been creepy if calhoun didn't kill that cy bug before it fully assimilated her husband.
don't really see anything post apocalyptic(outside parts of the tv series with how many ancient destroyers there were/hints of the sultans dark past.) as genie is a phenomenally cosmic powerful genie wouldn't be hard to imagine he could just go to any time period he wanted after he was freed/being all knowing.
wouldn't outright say captain hook's a hero as he tries to kill children but is definitely sympathetic with how messed up peter is.
hercules didn't kill scar as he was in shadow shown to be eaten by the hyena's/engulfed by the flames even if he survived the hyena's getting their fill,moreso it's a reference to the skin he wore in the myths.(though with how the lion king could take place in any time period with how no humans show up could take place around hercules time with a trader finding scars corpse.)
do like doug walker thoughts about it/the plays going with the gargoyles being quasi's imagination showing a somewhat depressing dive into his imagination finding comfort especially.(odd the archdeacon doesn't interact that much with quasimodo other than busy with his duty/being kept away by frollo.)
the prince was around 10-11 even in that time that wouldn't be romance age,if anything the enchantress being evil is more fitting with how the servants got punished as well for that act/didn't do anything about gaston especially in the remake letting him die.
the genie being revealed as the peddler was already confirmed by a deleted scene.(do like in king of thieves they kept him around implying he told the story of not only the movies but also the tv series/genie not being in the same scene.)
I’m pretty dang late to the party, but the “Hook is a Hero” theory is actually kind of true! In the original story, Peter Pan would kill the pirates for fun and with little to no remorse. He would also off the lost boys when they got too old (they still age- Pan is the only one who doesn’t). The pirates (minus Hook) are the lost boys that got out alive. Hook might be trying to rescue them from the fate they will eventually face.
Total Drama All Generations: Dumb to Brilliant and Weak to Powerful
Total Drama Heroes: Dumb to Brilliant and Weak to Powerful
Total Drama Villains: Dumb to Brilliant and Weak to Powerful
Total Drama Seasons: Worst to Best
Total Drama: World Tour, All Stars, and Pahkitew Island challenges: Gruesome to most Gruesome
Total Drama All Seasons Challenges: Dumb to Brilliant
Total Drama Plotholes: Smallest to Biggest
Chris McLean Deeds: Good to Evil
Fillmore, American Dragon: Jake Long, Doug, ChalkZone, Rocko's Modern Life, Aaahh Real Monsters, The Penguins of Madagascar, Ben 10, Stoked, 6teen, Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go, CatDog, Jimmy Two Shoes, Daria, My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic, Lilo and Stitch Experiments, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (87 + 03), Legends of Chamberlain Heights, Over the Hedge, Drawn Together, iCarly, Victorious, Open Season, and Total Dramarama: Good to Evil
I have not read the Beast Within yet but that theory bothers me. Reason being there is a line in Be Our Guest that says “ 10 years we’ve been rusting needing so much more than dusting,” I had always thought that Prince Adam was 11 when he was cursed meaning that he’d be in his 20s when the spell is broken. Therefore the s Enchantress and Prince Adam could not even have had a relationship. I have heard another theory that Prince Adam and Mrs. Potts could have had Chip together but I don’t think that makes sense either.
So was the Enchantress the same age as Prince Adam? The animated movie established that the Prince was a child when he was turned.
Can you do Wallace & Gromit: Good to evil?
Most good: Gromit
Good (silver): Shaun the Sheep
Good (bronze): Wallace
Grey area: Cooker
Evil (bronze): Feathers McGraw or Lord Victor Quartermaine
Evil (silver): Preston
Most evil: Piella Bakewell
I always assumed the gargoyles were clearly Quasimodo’s imagination…didn’t realise it was even up for debate until this video
I got one for ya
The original Goofy, AKA Dippy Dog, is actually Max's grandfather
In the silver age of Goofy shorts, Goofy has a son named Junior, making said son Goofy Jr.
The Goofy in the 1990s and early 2000s would be about the right age to be a kid then AND have a kid of his own
Now I will admit there is a key flaw in this: the other golden and silver age characters also being in the 1990s and early 2000s
Big brain Minecraft continuity; good to evil
Martin mysteries; good to evil
Scary stories to tell in the dark; good to evil
Can you do this format on other channels? I already thought of one for 1upbinge.
Mario theories: B.S. to truthbomb
BS: Peach is Bowser jr's mother
Possible: Mario is a psycopath
Truthbomb: Mario and his friends are actors
I would love to see it on more channels. Not just this one.
The end of the sequel film debunks the hunchback theory in my opinion. Not to mention in 13:00 why did the goat react like that if the gargoyle was imaginary, and if that was the case and they weren't doing the things they did in the final battle, then who was?
It makes no sense to try and say it’s “true” when showing that clip.
The cathedral is magical, so they’re actually brought to life.
@@tigerlord9302 Exactly!
MCU Thor Relationships! Healthy to Toxic!
Mat Pat is getting called out so hard in this video lol.
So ik the "Enchantress was in love with the beast theory" was proven by the book. But the beast was 10 when he was cursed and the woman looked 21-25 at least.
Well, with the Hunchback gargoyle theory, there is one piece of evidence that does go against it, but it's from a source that people prefer to forget. In Hunchback 2, Madellaine actually reacts to the gargoyles being alive from time to time, and at the end, she responds to their hope that she'll take care of Quasimodo, causing them to lose their jaws in shock that not only had she heard them, but she saw them in their sentient state, making that theory fall flat on its face. That and Esmeralda's goat seeing them alive being a running gag. Given this movie is often overlooked, disregarded, and forgotten due to being one of the many disappointing Disney sequels, it's understandable this wouldn't be taken into account at first.
Daredevil good to evil
Angel: Matt Murdock
Neutral: The punisher
Devil: Kingpin
Hi I know it might not be related to the video but I would like to see if Danganrompa characters in Squid games.
I would ❤️ to see a prequel about the fly in The Emperors New Groove and Beauty And The Beast!
Netflix a series of Unfortunate events good to evil
Yes! Do it!
Yes
Now do Which Family Guy Character Would Most Likely Win Squid Game, Which Nickelodeon Villains Would Most Likely Win Squid Game, Which Cartoon Network Protagonist Would Most Likely Win Squid Game, Which Disenchantment Character Would Most Likely Win Squid Game, Which Cartoon Network Protagonists/Antagonists Would Make The Best Heist Crew!
Hercules couldn't have killed Scar. Scar was eaten alive and burned, nothing would have been left of him. Also, why would Hercules travel from Greece to the African Savanna to kill a small, weak, and old lion?
Ok, the Snow White one actually getting a true love's kiss is not exactly confirmed, while it.did say that true love's kiss will break the spell, who knows that the Prince is actually Snow White's true love? After all, they only met for a few seconds. That is something to consider.
Also the debunking theories like the Tangled and Frozen one is not necessarily effective since Disney movies are known to be historically inaccurate. Like in Mulan and Aladdin the fireworks were colorful, when in both times it should have taken place, it should have been just grey.
Yeah you have a Point though Frozen and Tangled do Take Place in Different Times but Let's not Forget that This is a Movie so Anything is Possible in the World of Cartoons and Superheroes like even Aladdin and Hercules Take Place in Different Times and they Teamead up with each other
Can you please do which cyberchase character would win the
Squid games?🦑
Which Cartoon Network character would win Squid Game
01:Space Ghost
02:Dexter
03:Johnny Bravo
04:Blossom
05:Bubbles
06:Buttercup
07:Cow
08:Chicken
09:I.M Weasel
10:I.R baboon
11:Ed
12:Edd
13:Eddy
14:Courage
15:Sheep
16:Samurai Jack
17:Robot Jones
18:Numbah 1
19:Billy
20:Mandy
21:Mac
22:Blu
23:Lazlo
24:Chowder
25:Ben 10
26:Flapjack
27:Captain Knuckles
28:Fin
29:Jake
30:Mordeci
31:Rigby
32:Uncle Grandpa
33:Steven Universe
34:Clarence
35:O.K
36:Gumball
37:Darwin
PLEASE WICKEDBINGE!!!
I really really hope they will make this
Yes! Do it!
I think they tied the Peddler and the Genie in the live-action Aladdin.
The Aladdin theory isn't totally out of the question because at the beginning of the movie, we see the caravan guy carrying a Plastic Container which plastic is man made and its earliest appearance is 1907
Here's the problem though: Considering that the timeline of Beauty and the Beast suggests the prince was ten or eleven when he was cursed, that would mean that if the enchantress was in love with him, than that would make her a pedophile, meaning that he had every right to be disturbed by her presence and turn her away, making him 100% innocent for protecting himself from her.
Tbf we don’t know how old the enchantress is. Oh sure, she definitely disguises herself as an old woman, but that was just that. A disguise. She could’ve been a child too for all we know. In fact, if she was, her actions would make all the more sense. A child throwing a tantrum when they don’t get what they want.
Cartoon Network 2010 Villains: Evil to Most Evil
Hi I know it might not be related to the video but I would like to see if Danganrompa characters in Squid games.
Yes! Do it!
Most Evil: Anti-Pops
Amphibia good to evil please
You should do nfl rush zone characters good to evil
the vampires diaries characters good to evil
The Originals characters good to evil
Tales of aracdia characters good to evil in three separate video
Threat levels: harmless to Dangerous
"Disney is protective of their characters". Really because technically they didn't even create most of them. Hercules is from Roman mythology (Heracles is the Greek version), every fairy tale they've done has already existed for at least a 100 years if not longer, when a character was uniquely created Disney just buys the rights (like they did with Star Wars).
With Bambi’s mom, Judge Doom was also considered by Robert Zemeckis to be “Man” but ultimately abandoned the concept.
Honestly, I don't really see a connection between Scar and Hercules' stories. I feel like it was just an easter egg kind of moment.... Then again, most fan theories don't really phase me as I find them to be a bit weird in general.
I can only imagine that Walt Disney himself would've debunked that Snow White theory in a snap. But for some reason, I still believe Gaston is the killer of Bambi's mom. From my point of the genie, the 10,000 years was only exaggeration and could perhaps have the power to look into future times for inspiration becomings.
Could you do these for good to evil list please.
Sword art online
The owl house
Amphibia
Indiana Jones
Free guy
Alita battle angel
Hi I know it might not be related to the video but I would like to see if Danganrompa characters in Squid games.
Amphibia and the Owl House are great picks. I put in the Ghost and Molly Mac Gee too.
The boss baby 1 and 2 characters: good to evil
That would be an interesting list
Hi I know it might not be related to the video but I would like to see if Danganrompa characters in Squid games.
Yes! Do it!
8:00 The genie is silly, he's prolly exaggerating
Or the lamp has accelerated time
10:20 Likelier that the Nemean lion is a distant cousin or ancestor lion
But if it *was* true? Think about how that scales the Lion King relative to Hercules' size
Or the lamp exists outside of time and space
Amphibia Characters: Good to Evil.
Snow White though that theory I mean I've also heard that in her mind that Apple was actually 100% magic because she took a bite she basically closed her eyes and when she opened them she was getting the kiss of true love so it was magic she didn't know that she had quote unquote died or anything
Who else wants wickedbinge and a film theory collab for a disney video
5:48
Fans of snatcher from a hat in time: That's where your wrong.
Can you do Bluey characters good to most good please
4:26 You mean the “Dcu”.
Disney
Cinematic
Universe
Brad can you do Xena warrior Princess good to Evil next?
There's actually a theory that Hercules is actually related to Ariel too because of in the mythology their fathers are distant relatives are not distant relatives I guess like her grandfather is his father's brother or some s*** so I don't know there's some level of cousins who probably wouldn't know each other
i dont see hook really that evil. i see peter pan the real villain. he cares more about himself. but hook did start out as a hero. but pan ruined him
Glenn Quagmire’s Deeds: Good to Evil
Peter Griffin's Deeds: Good to Evil
Meg Griffin's Deeds: Good to Evil
Chris Griffin's Deeds: Good to Evil
Brian Griffin's Deeds: Good to Evil
Me: eats Cheetos
WB: says bull$471
Me: starts chocking
the beast was 21 in the movie and they sing about it being 10 years so removing a few years for drama the most he could have been when changed was 16.