Finally we have someone promoting science for the sake of knowledge and education . Not for the rat race of just clearing entrance exams ! Great going Sir .
They can use 2 calibrated clocks to record time of both particles, no need to wait for the signal to come from the space station to lab on earth. Just a thought.
But sir , we can measure the time on which they change their spin according to one another. I mean to say , we can observe the spin of the entangled particle in the lab and note down its time and at the same time we can observe the spin of its entangled partical in the space station and note down that time. Then we can match the information later and we can see the difference between the time of both observations and if that's with no difference or smaller than the time taken by light to cover the distance between them. Then it can prove if the information is travelling faster than the speed of light or not. Thank you
Information never travels faster than the speed of light ,, the two entangled particles are a part of same wave function and thus measuring the one collapses the entire wave function and then the state of the particle is known simulataneously ,, the intriguing part is whether the state of the particles is pre decided or not
My Hindi is not that fluent, Manish, but I would say your explanation has been extremely valuable in giving me an understanding of Quantum Entanglement.
Thank you for a very to the point explanation.Good teacher, Im 60yrs and still understood it. 😄 Does the result still depend on the single observer? 🤔..if so then the practical application of it,to traverse one lakh miles to the other galaxy in one second is only in the mind,without vision,because the cat is still in the box..these theories are supposing the cat comes out,or till the box is actually opened,there is a visual factor here,witness. But here unless we enquire into the nature of the mind itself,and attain a state where it becomes the universe( advaita brahman,)we will only have a hypothetical, proved by a known method,using the behaviour of a known mineral/compound, it can only prove it for that,how many will we test.? In other words,we know this in controlled conditions.We know the space station is there,we have not seen it in the experiment.We went there in thought,but could not bring back the reflected light into the room, not a photo,but an image,like the eye sees?Bottom line is we are approaching the problem ( of going to another galaxy at speed of thought) without evolving ourselves to the level mind that can go there, without altering outer factors,like eg gravity controlled spacesuits to on the moon.If its mind thats the issue ( observer) thats what we should be tackling,because its directly under our personal control,its universal( so available to all, and not just to the observer)instead of trying to control unpredictable variables( this includes human fear of unknown,controlled by drugging, or brainwashing) and destroying environment ,the earth,to put together one spaceship,which may burn up before it leaves the earth.This argument is not against scientific enquiry,experentation,but to do it rightly,morally,using common sense,historical proofs, etc. and universally viable,means affordable..thats common sense.
Sir, use always says in the sessions I am there for you students you can ask you can me during session or abd so on. But Sir i had messaged you a alot of time . And the first messages first doubt was send around 6 months ago. Then I had requested you during a session and you have told me ki gurpreet message me now after the session ends i will see. But the reality is this you had never reply me fb .. You are not helping us and just creating vabe hopes .. I will never ever trust you again anymore. .
12:38 sir suppose agar wo dusra photon iss me na hokar kahi bahut dur hai (say infinity) then apne tak uss info ko pahuchne me toh kafi samay lg Jaye ho sakta hai wo hm tak pahuche na tb kya hoga??? bataye
Don’t think of it as a particle but think of these entangled particle as parts of a wave function , measuring one collapses the wave function and thus we know the state of other particle no matter where it is ,
But sir if we also communicate through quantum entangled pairs like we take 2 sets of entangled particles two on earth other two on iss . Then we run experiment on photon on earth and found its spin is up . Then we know other one spin is down but two confirm it we take help of other entangled pair at the same time that now the particle on iss is under experiment at the same time and we found that its spin is up then other particle at earth have spin down . Now suppose that both people's on iss and on earth before experiment meet and decide that if first particle on iss comes up because of experiment on earth we will immediately run experiment on other particle at iss and if on earth the entangled particle spin comes down than it means that first particle spin is down also in such way isn't there is a 50 percent chance of getting the information right faster than speed of light . Or I am just overthinking
I was also thinking Exactly similarly before of using two pairs for faster communication .. and i also believe that if there is any Inteligent species exist in the Universe they will not use old school rf communication techniques instead they will use Technology similar to Entanglement . But how they manage to entangled not sure many things to still understand but May be during cosmic inflation all particles are seperated from Subatomic distance to Lights year a part after the big bang so there migh be lots more Entangled Pairs floting in the Universe just my thought 🤔
@@omsingharjit as we don't know in what state the other two entangled particles are in so when in iss we measure it state of one particle let's say it come up some the one on earth is down and we are using it to confirm the up spin of 1st pair particle at iss .but it's not confirmed that the state of 2 entangled pair particle is what so now I suggest if we reduce the spin to only up and down which we can do . Then also there is a 50 percent chances of getting the confirmation wrong . So how to increase this percent or probability is what I am talking about.
Intresting fact.. This non linear optics Conversion is up conversion and down conversion where KDP , and BBo crystal used to either split higher frequency/Shorter wavelength into two lower frequency/Longer wavelength light or combine it in vise versa . Higher energy light like blue violet light can split into two lower Energy light like ex Red and green both with opposite polarization to Follow Conservation of Momentum so it's Entanglement. If you buy and point Green laser you actually using this nonlinear Technology it uses higher power lower energy ir laser to convert into green light using That same crystal bbo or KDP if you do the opposite it will also generate Entanglement. Laser name 303 dangerous laser for eyes 👀
Still not clear how quantum entanglement exactly happens. If I have to quantum entangle positron and electron from entirely two different elements how to make that happen? Kindly make a video on this
Einstein's Theory of General Relativity Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity Einstein's Mass Energy Equivalence E= mc² Einstein's Photoelectric effect Bose- Einstein Condensate Einstein Ring And Sir Albert Einstein is here in quantum entanglement also Wow And so on
Elbert Einstein was wrong because hidden variables was proven to be wrong by John bell ,, Copenhagen interpretation by niel Bohr and Heisenberg was right
Also Dear, It would also help the audience (Not than many did n't already -:)) , Classical Model included study of Universe - Gift from Einstein where as Quauntum theory included studies of ever evoving particle (coming into being discovered) Physics
Thanks 🙏🙏 sir for uploading this video.i have already requested to you in backward videos for uploading.please sir quantum computer videos jald se upload kariye gaa 🙏🙏🙏
Sir if you think 🤔 this is one of the exampal of number line x & y axes +1 is existing. Then that equal distance _1 will be existing sir therome is matamatecale proved tx
Wave /carpuscles relation depends on absence/presence of observer. Sat Ko asat aur asat ko sat bananeki jo vilakshan power hai use Maya shakti kahate hai. Dekhane jao toh dhikhai nahi deti.astitvhin nasti hoti hai Vo nahi hai kahane jao toh pratyaksh sat hone ka anubhav deti hai. Ye nahi ko hai me aur hai ko nahi me Sirf badal nahi deti vaisa anubhav bhi kara deti hai. Jo es power ke prabhav me hai use uska gyan nahi hota. Use Maya ki sachai aur satya ki sachai ka gyan nahi hota.
Einstein misguided on many respect . He introduced the concept of space time wrap. Space is full of powerful fields of various kinds .some field only can propagate with velocity of light like magnetic field , electric field etc . Field for gavity can move with infinite velocity . He did not dare to say the existance of field insted he jntroduces time space wrap .
Sir,i need some suggestion from you. Read my situation here👇 I am really interest in physics[mainly Astrophysics], but I am confused whether to choose NIT/IIT/IISER,etc. Actually I secured 98.22%ile in mains, AIR 872 in IISER APTITUDE TEST, but AIR 16964 in JEE ADV I have three options:- A) join NIT with CSE B)IISERs C)taking drop and prepare my best for jee adv My family's financial condition is not so well...and thats the reason why i am choosing BTech(say in cse) and after 4-5yrs, If I find that there is no financial problem in my home,i may go for MSc-phd Astrophysics(via IIT JAM). Taking BTech just as a backup. I literally dont know whether my decision is correct or not, no one is present in my area,who can guide me!!!! I dont have any problem for drop,i am ready to drop...i just need someone's Guidance!!! Help please
go to IISERs I will recommending you, you can do research there also if you are interested in research. [ also if your famliy's financial condition allow it ].
@@dianummusic going to IISER is not a problem. Main issue is,if I want to persue astrophysics, I will need to complete phd,and i am not sure whether i will do phd or not, coz i dont know what will be the financial situation of our house,after 5yrs...thats the real problem
You said its finite time required for information to reach us but is it the speed of that information less than 3 lakh km/s ? If its more, then again how its faster than light. Is it even calculated at the time of experiment ? Again, can we send one particle just 3-5 km away from other particle so that we need very less time for the information of other particle to come to us ? In this case also we need to check the speed of information. We cant just say its finite time for information travel but need to find exact speed then only we come to know if its less or more than speed of light. Because speed of light is not infinite. Please do reply.
Hello sir, I am requesting to make a video on Amal kumar Raichudhary. He was known for his Raichudhary equation which is used by Sir Stephen Hawking in his singularity theory. The equation was big achievement in the world of physics, but nobody is taking about him or his work. Most of the kids like me don't know him. So please 🙏 sir I am requesting to make a video on him. Please 🙏. Love you sir 🤍
nimbus : sir , I'm afraid that u hv very little following despite the fact u hv very good knowledge of physics. Most indian u-tubers r clueless what is quantum entanglement . Even ppl who deal in Arts faculties , r explaining work of Zellinger's , Bell's theorem . It's all about money . excellent work keep going , keep up . I for me , i think audience on Utube is very. ordinary . They like ppl who know little physics. (Alice kumar singh has scholarly knowledge of physics, metaphysics , relativity, string theory , epistemology, ontology , English phonetics & accent)
I got confused at the end 12:19 . You said where the information travelled faster than light as you mentioned that it takes finite time to know me the position of quantam counterparts. Question is not the time taken by you to know ... Question is how the other photon came to knew what and where its quantam entangled counterpart is ... You seemed to have rushed explaining this part as video was cut abruptly at that point when you say "its not". At that moment i said .. "yes it does". The quantam particles intercommunication speed was being questioned by Einstein not the speed of us knowing stuff.
Hello dear, Entanglement means the two parts are connected. Once you touch A , B getsvto know instantaneously. Yes thats true. The physical information about it will have to travel through the standard communication channel and that will take finite time.
@@NimbusEducation thanks. That connects the dots. But i believe quantum physicists say that information between entangled particles travels faster than light. And as per general theory of relativity its impossible for us humans to ever break that barrior
Sir you said that scientist at lab got the information about the spin of the other particle in a finite time,but people at the space centre got it at the very instance as the people who got information about particle at lab. It means both information were known at the very same instance is'nt it? Why is it not being considered this way?
Phirr bhi samajh nahi aaya ki dono ko ek time pe observed kiya gaya ya ek jagah observe hua to doosri jagah automatically collapse ho gaya and alram trigger hua Can we hold any particular observatory observed later
Automatically collapse ho jayega , agar tum dusre ko measure nahin bhi karoge toh bhi yeh confirmed hai ki dusre particle ki state turant collapse ho jayegi
When we measure 1 entangled Photon suppose having spin up then we know second Photon's spin i.e spin down (at this instant second Photon not existing in spin down in universe unless we measure it, and when we measure and know, it takes enough time ie. Still information can't break speed limit) it's like 😀 we predicting a car 🚗 future positions by knowing its speed and direction etc. But during predicting time we can't say that car is existing in both present as well as future. 👍 Plz tell if it's like this as I thought 🤔??
its actually mind blowing & just great efforts from your side, it very helpful to bend the thought process towards quantum mechanics&computing thankyou so much 💕💕💕💫💫👍👍
Sir I don't know much about physics or quantum physics I just wonder it. I have question if quantum entanglement is proved then in future can we known the orgin of universe as we can study many electrons photons neutrons which present here on earth which entangled with the ends of known universe. Is this the consciousness of universe how it works
that means ,that this is a simply a phenomenon of quantum particles which are entageled or associate with each other. But ,how we know ,which photons are entangled and which are not,there is also a possibilities that more than one photon are entangled.
Finally we have someone promoting science for the sake of knowledge and education . Not for the rat race of just clearing entrance exams ! Great going Sir .
They can use 2 calibrated clocks to record time of both particles, no need to wait for the signal to come from the space station to lab on earth. Just a thought.
And why we are considering this time if are not talking about human communication we are talking about communication in between particles
But sir , we can measure the time on which they change their spin according to one another. I mean to say , we can observe the spin of the entangled particle in the lab and note down its time and at the same time we can observe the spin of its entangled partical in the space station and note down that time. Then we can match the information later and we can see the difference between the time of both observations and if that's with no difference or smaller than the time taken by light to cover the distance between them. Then it can prove if the information is travelling faster than the speed of light or not. Thank you
Exactly
Information never travels faster than the speed of light ,, the two entangled particles are a part of same wave function and thus measuring the one collapses the entire wave function and then the state of the particle is known simulataneously ,, the intriguing part is whether the state of the particles is pre decided or not
@@Imcrazyfornaruto and how the wave function is still stable at such long distance?
Itne ache se Hindi mei kisi ne nahi samjhaya sir you're great 😻💖
My Hindi is not that fluent, Manish, but I would say your explanation has been extremely valuable in giving me an understanding of Quantum Entanglement.
Thank you for a very to the point explanation.Good teacher, Im 60yrs and still understood it. 😄 Does the result still depend on the single observer? 🤔..if so then the practical application of it,to traverse one lakh miles to the other galaxy in one second is only in the mind,without vision,because the cat is still in the box..these theories are supposing the cat comes out,or till the box is actually opened,there is a visual factor here,witness. But here unless we enquire into the nature of the mind itself,and attain a state where it becomes the universe( advaita brahman,)we will only have a hypothetical, proved by a known method,using the behaviour of a known mineral/compound, it can only prove it for that,how many will we test.? In other words,we know this in controlled conditions.We know the space station is there,we have not seen it in the experiment.We went there in thought,but could not bring back the reflected light into the room, not a photo,but an image,like the eye sees?Bottom line is we are approaching the problem ( of going to another galaxy at speed of thought) without evolving ourselves to the level mind that can go there, without altering outer factors,like eg gravity controlled spacesuits to on the moon.If its mind thats the issue ( observer) thats what we should be tackling,because its directly under our personal control,its universal( so available to all, and not just to the observer)instead of trying to control unpredictable variables( this includes human fear of unknown,controlled by drugging, or brainwashing) and destroying environment ,the earth,to put together one spaceship,which may burn up before it leaves the earth.This argument is not against scientific enquiry,experentation,but to do it rightly,morally,using common sense,historical proofs, etc. and universally viable,means affordable..thats common sense.
Sir what a beautiful video on quantum entanglement!
Physics ❤️❤️❤️
So what light is faster than information of quantum entanglement??
Thanks for the knowledge...spend my 10+ minutes for this video ... worthy.
Manish,
Very well explained. I stumbled upon your channel after reading articles on other sites. Your simplicity, clarity got me hooked. Best wishes
Sir, use always says in the sessions I am there for you students you can ask you can me during session or abd so on.
But Sir i had messaged you a alot of time .
And the first messages first doubt was send around 6 months ago.
Then I had requested you during a session and you have told me ki gurpreet message me now after the session ends i will see.
But the reality is this you had never reply me fb ..
You are not helping us and just creating vabe hopes .. I will never ever trust you again anymore. .
Sir m PCB student doing NEET prepration bt so much interested in astronomy ....how can I join NASA .ISRO plzz tell me
Go for ISRO if possible, work for india, it's my ambition to join isro too
I also ...but how🙄
@@astrophile6250 u should have done jee preparation
Not any other options through PCB
@@beatbox9794 not necessary
Thanks, sir for the simplified explanation 🙏
Nice presentation. Lucid and easily understandable. Pl keep it up. 👍👍👍
@7:37 The abbreviation for Faster Than Light is FTL, not FLT.
12:38 sir suppose agar wo dusra photon iss me na hokar kahi bahut dur hai (say infinity) then apne tak uss info ko pahuchne me toh kafi samay lg Jaye ho sakta hai wo hm tak pahuche na tb kya hoga??? bataye
Don’t think of it as a particle but think of these entangled particle as parts of a wave function , measuring one collapses the wave function and thus we know the state of other particle no matter where it is ,
Thankyou Brother... Good speaking ability,
Good information, informative and knowlegeable video. Please continue... Thankyou.
But sir if we also communicate through quantum entangled pairs like we take 2 sets of entangled particles two on earth other two on iss . Then we run experiment on photon on earth and found its spin is up . Then we know other one spin is down but two confirm it we take help of other entangled pair at the same time that now the particle on iss is under experiment at the same time and we found that its spin is up then other particle at earth have spin down . Now suppose that both people's on iss and on earth before experiment meet and decide that if first particle on iss comes up because of experiment on earth we will immediately run experiment on other particle at iss and if on earth the entangled particle spin comes down than it means that first particle spin is down also in such way isn't there is a 50 percent chance of getting the information right faster than speed of light . Or I am just overthinking
I was also thinking Exactly similarly before of using two pairs for faster communication .. and i also believe that if there is any Inteligent species exist in the Universe they will not use old school rf communication techniques instead they will use Technology similar to Entanglement . But how they manage to entangled not sure many things to still understand but May be during cosmic inflation all particles are seperated from Subatomic distance to Lights year a part after the big bang so there migh be lots more Entangled Pairs floting in the Universe just my thought 🤔
Now the catch is that how to increase this probability.
@@ujjwalbindal1798 probability of what?
@@omsingharjit as we don't know in what state the other two entangled particles are in so when in iss we measure it state of one particle let's say it come up some the one on earth is down and we are using it to confirm the up spin of 1st pair particle at iss .but it's not confirmed that the state of 2 entangled pair particle is what so now I suggest if we reduce the spin to only up and down which we can do . Then also there is a 50 percent chances of getting the confirmation wrong . So how to increase this percent or probability is what I am talking about.
Intresting fact..
This non linear optics Conversion is up conversion and down conversion where KDP , and BBo crystal used to either split higher frequency/Shorter wavelength into two lower frequency/Longer wavelength light or combine it in vise versa .
Higher energy light like blue violet light can split into two lower Energy light like ex Red and green both with opposite polarization to Follow Conservation of Momentum so it's Entanglement.
If you buy and point Green laser you actually using this nonlinear Technology it uses higher power lower energy ir laser to convert into green light using That same crystal bbo or KDP if you do the opposite it will also generate Entanglement.
Laser name 303 dangerous laser for eyes 👀
Nice sir....mai wait kr rha tha apke video ki is topic pr😊😊😊
Still not clear how quantum entanglement exactly happens. If I have to quantum entangle positron and electron from entirely two different elements how to make that happen? Kindly make a video on this
quantum mechanics is scam
Einstein's Theory of General Relativity
Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity
Einstein's Mass Energy Equivalence E= mc²
Einstein's Photoelectric effect
Bose- Einstein Condensate
Einstein Ring
And Sir Albert Einstein is here in quantum entanglement also
Wow
And so on
Elbert Einstein was wrong because hidden variables was proven to be wrong by John bell ,, Copenhagen interpretation by niel Bohr and Heisenberg was right
I'm absolutely amazed how simply such a complex concept was explained. Amazing
19:16 is that experiment is Quantum eraser one ? Using bbo , splitter etc ?
I also felt this was almost similar to Quantum eraser experiment.
Can quantum entanglement be a hypothesis of gateway to wormhole or space travel(V>C).
When Mind crosses 3D, then it attains widespread nature. Which is similar to quantum entanglement.
Wow sir concept clear!!📚🙏
Can u explain the conclusion once again .. How light is faster and information is not ..
Some where in a TH-cam , Penrose has spoken about Quantum entanglement being process powered by BlackHoles between entangled particles
Apke video dekh kar bahoot knowledge milti he science ke bare me
Same electron ko do baar chek kiya h kya?? Kya pata vo hamesha hi isi opposite position me ho
Also Dear, It would also help the audience (Not than many did n't already -:)) , Classical Model included study of Universe - Gift from Einstein where as Quauntum theory included studies of ever evoving particle (coming into being discovered) Physics
If one pair of entangled particle goes in side black hole then what will happen to the particle which is present outside the black hole???????????????????????????????????????????? ?? ? ?? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ?
1 Photon ko apne do photon me kaise banta ,kya photon ve aur chhote chhote Kan se bana hai
Shaandar, Jabardast....!!
But you didn't tell or make hypothesis why this and how this happened in quantum world information travel with very high speed
Goosebumps🥶
Thank you sir itni saral bhasha me smjhane ke liye
i am very excited for next video.
Surely dear ❤🎉🎊💯
Thanks 🙏🙏 sir for uploading this video.i have already requested to you in backward videos for uploading.please sir quantum computer videos jald se upload kariye gaa 🙏🙏🙏
Sir your explain very well to us in easy words, and make us understand it.
Ist of all Congratulations to Nobel prize winners
Sir if you think 🤔 this is one of the exampal of number line x & y axes +1 is existing. Then that equal distance _1 will be existing sir therome is matamatecale proved tx
Sir if I was worng what is. My mistake tell me in this coment section sir
I'm just waiting this video like hell 🤩🤩
4:33 spooky fast action at a very very large distance!
Sir aapki videos har koi nhi samaj sakta 😁😀
Wave /carpuscles relation depends on absence/presence of observer.
Sat Ko asat aur asat ko sat bananeki jo vilakshan power hai use Maya shakti kahate hai. Dekhane jao toh dhikhai nahi deti.astitvhin nasti hoti hai Vo nahi hai kahane jao toh pratyaksh sat hone ka anubhav deti hai. Ye nahi ko hai me aur hai ko nahi me Sirf badal nahi deti vaisa anubhav bhi kara deti hai.
Jo es power ke prabhav me hai use uska gyan nahi hota. Use Maya ki sachai aur satya ki sachai ka gyan nahi hota.
Thank you sir, you are the only way to learn the things in most fantastic way.
Excellent Excellent Excellent
Always fascinated by watching your videos sir.. it's so much informative..
Einstein misguided on many respect . He introduced the concept of space time wrap. Space is full of powerful fields of various kinds .some field only can propagate with velocity of light like magnetic field , electric field etc . Field for gavity can move with infinite velocity .
He did not dare to say the existance of field insted he jntroduces time space wrap .
Fantastic
Sir,i need some suggestion from you. Read my situation here👇
I am really interest in physics[mainly Astrophysics], but I am confused whether to choose NIT/IIT/IISER,etc. Actually I secured 98.22%ile in mains, AIR 872 in IISER APTITUDE TEST, but AIR 16964 in JEE ADV
I have three options:-
A) join NIT with CSE
B)IISERs
C)taking drop and prepare my best for jee adv
My family's financial condition is not so well...and thats the reason why i am choosing BTech(say in cse) and after 4-5yrs, If I find that there is no financial problem in my home,i may go for MSc-phd Astrophysics(via IIT JAM). Taking BTech just as a backup.
I literally dont know whether my decision is correct or not, no one is present in my area,who can guide me!!!!
I dont have any problem for drop,i am ready to drop...i just need someone's Guidance!!!
Help please
.
Contact me
@@adityaupadhyay434 waah,aapne toh badhiya soln diye mere problem ka
go to IISERs
I will recommending you, you can do research there also if you are interested in research. [ also if your famliy's financial condition allow it ].
@@dianummusic going to IISER is not a problem. Main issue is,if I want to persue astrophysics, I will need to complete phd,and i am not sure whether i will do phd or not, coz i dont know what will be the financial situation of our house,after 5yrs...thats the real problem
Kripaya classical physics journey start karte hue quantum physics Tak pahuchne ka vedio banane
You said its finite time required for information to reach us but is it the speed of that information less than 3 lakh km/s ? If its more, then again how its faster than light. Is it even calculated at the time of experiment ? Again, can we send one particle just 3-5 km away from other particle so that we need very less time for the information of other particle to come to us ? In this case also we need to check the speed of information. We cant just say its finite time for information travel but need to find exact speed then only we come to know if its less or more than speed of light. Because speed of light is not infinite. Please do reply.
Nice explain 🤞
Bahut acchi explanation h
bechari billi🥲🥲
Psychology ma ek concept hai TELEPATHY ka.
Nameste sir abhi maine video dekhi nahi hai lekin pata hai bahdaiya hi hogi
Wondering 🙂🤔🤔🤔🤯
But feels good to be acknowledged of it.
Sir, aap ne bahuth hi saral bhasha me, aam aadmi ki samaj ke bahar ka vishay ko aasani se samajya diya, aap ko bahuth bahuth dhanyavad,
Amazing as always sir 🔥🙂
Hello sir, I am requesting to make a video on Amal kumar Raichudhary. He was known for his Raichudhary equation which is used by Sir Stephen Hawking in his singularity theory. The equation was big achievement in the world of physics, but nobody is taking about him or his work. Most of the kids like me don't know him. So please 🙏 sir I am requesting to make a video on him. Please 🙏. Love you sir 🤍
Amazing session
Sir, kya is bat se pta chalta hai ki time travel possible hai?
No it has got nothing to do with Time travel
Can a photon experience time⌚⌚⌚, it will decay into other particles?????
Well explained... 👌
In simple language very good presentation
Itna achha explain ek scientist hi kar sakte hai 🙏🏻🙏🏻
nimbus : sir , I'm afraid that u hv very little following despite the fact u hv very good knowledge of physics. Most
indian u-tubers r clueless what is quantum entanglement . Even ppl who deal in Arts faculties , r explaining work of Zellinger's , Bell's theorem .
It's all about money . excellent work keep going , keep up . I for me , i think
audience on Utube is very. ordinary . They like ppl who know little physics.
(Alice kumar singh has scholarly knowledge of physics, metaphysics ,
relativity, string theory , epistemology,
ontology , English phonetics & accent)
Thanks
Bery low voice compared to ads..kon fod dete hai ek dum ads
Thank you for your simplicity
❤
Sir new Nobel prize pr bhi bna do video
Best explaination, Easy explained , 🙏👍
Very well explained
I got confused at the end 12:19 . You said where the information travelled faster than light as you mentioned that it takes finite time to know me the position of quantam counterparts. Question is not the time taken by you to know ... Question is how the other photon came to knew what and where its quantam entangled counterpart is ... You seemed to have rushed explaining this part as video was cut abruptly at that point when you say "its not". At that moment i said .. "yes it does". The quantam particles intercommunication speed was being questioned by Einstein not the speed of us knowing stuff.
Hello dear,
Entanglement means the two parts are connected. Once you touch A , B getsvto know instantaneously.
Yes thats true.
The physical information about it will have to travel through the standard communication channel and that will take finite time.
@@NimbusEducation thanks. That connects the dots. But i believe quantum physicists say that information between entangled particles travels faster than light. And as per general theory of relativity its impossible for us humans to ever break that barrior
Sir Up and down on current timing
Thanks sir
Kaise kardega inform?
Such a nice explanation 💜
Sir you said that scientist at lab got the information about the spin of the other particle in a finite time,but people at the space centre got it at the very instance as the people who got information about particle at lab.
It means both information were known at the very same instance is'nt it? Why is it not being considered this way?
Phirr bhi samajh nahi aaya ki dono ko ek time pe observed kiya gaya ya ek jagah observe hua to doosri jagah automatically collapse ho gaya and alram trigger hua
Can we hold any particular observatory observed later
Automatically collapse ho jayega , agar tum dusre ko measure nahin bhi karoge toh bhi yeh confirmed hai ki dusre particle ki state turant collapse ho jayegi
Yes you can observe it later and it will be according to the entangled state
When we measure 1 entangled Photon suppose having spin up then we know second Photon's spin i.e spin down (at this instant second Photon not existing in spin down in universe unless we measure it, and when we measure and know, it takes enough time ie. Still information can't break speed limit) it's like 😀 we predicting a car 🚗 future positions by knowing its speed and direction etc. But during predicting time we can't say that car is existing in both present as well as future. 👍 Plz tell if it's like this as I thought 🤔??
Thanks sir 😊😊
its actually mind blowing & just great efforts from your side, it very helpful to bend the thought process towards quantum mechanics&computing thankyou so much 💕💕💕💫💫👍👍
Sir kya hoga agr hum dono ko ek he saath ek he time par dekh te hai?? Please reply
Kisi bhi moment pe agar tumne ek entangled particle ko measure kiya toh dusre ki state turant fix ho jayegi
Outstanding sir
Sir i am a pcb student, i clear my 12th class but i have entrusted in modern physics (quantum physics) how i am research this field ❤️
It will be better join physics hons in any premier institute and go for pg and phd from world recognized dept for expertise
Thank you sir ❤
Sir I don't know much about physics or quantum physics I just wonder it. I have question if quantum entanglement is proved then in future can we known the orgin of universe as we can study many electrons photons neutrons which present here on earth which entangled with the ends of known universe. Is this the consciousness of universe how it works
legendry explanation sir
Sir, samjha ke ek ke spin up hai to dusre ke down hoga. Laken ye spin kiska up hoga aur kiska down hoga ye pahle se thik v ho sakta hai?
Sir I am unable to understand last explanation given by u
Best explanation
I have added it to watch later and will watch it after reaching home.
Congratulations sir for 100k family 🌹❤️🙏
sir ek aap hi ho pure youtube mein aap hi bas ho jo itne detail mein video banate ho baki sab toh sirf hawa mein baat karke chale jate hain
that means ,that this is a simply a phenomenon of quantum particles which are entageled or associate with each other.
But ,how we know ,which photons are entangled and which are not,there is also a possibilities that more than one photon are entangled.
Superb sir🙏🌹🙏
Keep watching