On the life & Philosophy of Derrida & his Relation to German Thought With Dr. Dylan Shaul (UCR).

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ต.ค. 2024
  • The Following video is a continuation of my series on Classical German philosophy and Post-Kantian thought tilted "On the life & Philosophy of Derrida & his Relation to German Thought With Dr. Dylan Shaul" (University of California, Riverside).
    In this episode of the Young Idealist, we take a small detour to Algeria and then head over to France in order to discuss the French philosopher Jacques Derrida (1930-2004).
    For this special episode I invited Dr. Dylan Shaul who is an Assistant Professor (tenure-track) in the Department of Philosophy at the University of California, Riverside. Dr. Shaul specializes in 18th/19th Century Philosophy (especially German Idealism) and Jewish Philosophy and also has interests in Early Modern Philosophy, 20th Century European Philosophy, Ethics, and Philosophy of Religion. Dr. Shaul was a perfect candidate for this interview since he works very closely on both Derrida and Hegel.
    In 2023-2024, Dr. Shaul was Postdoctoral Fellow at Yale University.
    We discuss many important areas of Derrida's thought including:
    The Life and Times of Derrida
    A Summary of Derrida's project (Early and Late Derrida)
    We Talk about Derrida's place in the History of Philosophy, from Plato to the present.
    A series of pairings with classical German philosophers: e.g. Derrida
    and Kant, Derrida and Hegel, Derrida and Marx, and Heidegger,
    A Contemporary reception of Derrida in relation to German philosophy, e.g. within the contemporary 'Hegel renaissance'.
    Dr. Shaul helps navigate the viewer through the rich and complex life of the French philosopher Jacques Derrida by highlighting why Derrida's philosophical insights matter today.
    Enjoy the Episode!
    yale.academia....
    • ASMR girl in the back ...
    philpeople.org...
    www.dylanshaul...
    profiles.ucr.e...
    philpeople.org...

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @Parsons4Geist
    @Parsons4Geist หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    HIs three-part documentary on the pantheism controversy was off the chain excellent ❤

    • @daviddenyer1679
      @daviddenyer1679 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      How does one access the recommended documentary?

    • @Parsons4Geist
      @Parsons4Geist หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@daviddenyer1679
      th-cam.com/video/iE6jZoTN7uE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=bRYjr85JNFClkw67
      part 1

    • @Parsons4Geist
      @Parsons4Geist หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@daviddenyer1679
      part 2
      th-cam.com/video/MY8Y2Fl0Ouc/w-d-xo.htmlsi=aUgWIzNOVeov4jIG

    • @Parsons4Geist
      @Parsons4Geist หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@daviddenyer1679
      part 3
      th-cam.com/video/P8TE6-jlAU0/w-d-xo.htmlsi=5TdFREETLwEo6Cjj

    • @Parsons4Geist
      @Parsons4Geist หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@daviddenyer1679 sorry tried to put in, but link didn't go through. if you search the pantheism is in controversy on Seekers of unity you will find a 3 part series starting with Spinoza, next Kant and ending with Hegel

  • @Parsons4Geist
    @Parsons4Geist หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Dr. Shaul overviews of Derrida and his place in from German idealism up today with Zizeks Hegelianism was so so clear. what a wonderful teacher.

  • @zeezi2009
    @zeezi2009 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    A request to the guest - please write a book ASAP

  • @jaihunbek
    @jaihunbek หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow, Dylan Shaul is absolutely lucid! I loved this one. Knew of Derrida, but did not appreciate him as I do now thanks to Dr. Shaul.

  • @zeezi2009
    @zeezi2009 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Fascinating… thank you both for this enlightening conversation. Dr Dylan gave a very thorough explication of where Derrida fits in the history of the metaphysical tradition and it was - I must say - MUCH clearer than some of the books I’ve read.

  • @cmbodayle
    @cmbodayle หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Omg, I was totally called out by the “defense of Hegelians” thing! I couldn’t agree more with Dr. Shaul on this point about contradiction in Hegel. I am going to make a twitter post promoting the video when I finish, but I would just point out that I think Derrida’s comments about contradiction in “Positions” are very interesting here.

  • @clumsydad7158
    @clumsydad7158 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1/2 thru talk, Dr. Shaul does a wonderful summary/synthesizing of post-Kantian philosophy. Derrida is often derided as a provocateur, but this is the point, his analysis is a tool in 'thinking about thinking', just as Wittgenstein on language and Feynman on quantum reality has dissolved our ways of thinking on the nature of things. And the end of the 20th century we found ourselves at the bottom of a well of meaning, but one we long felt in our bones as our crisis. As Dr. Shaul alludes to, it's up to humanity to ascribe meaning via ethics, and to give up the childish nursery rhyme game of meaning via symbolic narrative myths. These are all good clues, but eventually humanity needs to put on our big boy pants to address our place in the world and beyond; to embrace that larger context and inherent responsibility.

  • @clumsydad7158
    @clumsydad7158 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    from nature we apprehend the absolute is plurality, temporality, and churning of systems, and the good, true, and beautiful only lodestars, as each generation grapples w/ an evolved epistemology, and our inextricable ties to our world life system.

  • @clumsydad7158
    @clumsydad7158 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i'm often impressed on how western philos in ways took two thousand years to get to the asian acceptance (purportedly) of the necessity of both sides of the coin, and the unresolvable antinomies and aporia, however one wants to say, as the eternal ying-yang. and hegel as the end of metaphysics, and the human impulse to 'wrap it all up w/ a bow', which is always humorous in a way, as one of the cardinal facts of history is that humanity yearly proves, via each new discovery in each branch of knowledge, that it does not know the totality, yet intractably speculates on the meta and telos nonetheless. ... via heidegger and wittgenstein we can apprehend we are only at the horizon of being and localized sense making, yet each human generation struggles to grasp our limitations, battling against the human will to judge and juris a minute circumscription of reality, and reify that as the latest 'way things are'.