These cards are advertised as 1080p cards aren't they? To be fair, at that resolution 8gb VRAM is not unreasonable. We are only having problems because games just aren't being optimised enough at launch. It's the price that smarts. I would prefer more VRAM though.
@@BigBossDLow You can't eat them alive, they might bite you. Next time you order Chinese food, ask for Gou Ro Mian. They will cook it properly for you. Add soy sauce for flavour. Thank me later
I always found it funny when people debate the TI on older cards because it's usually a 20% gain at most. So it's like buy a new card or get a 20% increase right. And rarely are new cards much more, example 2080ti vs 3080 The difference being 30 to 50 dollars.
Geez, I didn't expect to see you here. I have a 4070 Ti and it definitely was way more expensive than needed. $650 MSRP would've been pretty good. $800? Too much. But it's still a damn good 1440p card. Not a huge improvement from a 4070 though. But being on par with a 3090 Ti is damn good
So looking at prices in Germany currently (cheapest model) you're getting about 20% more performance for 37% more money (€100) when buying a 4060ti over a 4060.
The 7700xt uses upto 300w under full load and has an average performance gain of around 5 to 10% over the 4060. The 4060 consumes 115w under full load. I rest my case.
@@dexmiermaxime8583dawg what 4070 is like 15%\20% faster even faster in rt a 7800 XT would give you 4070 performance, that's the one you should buy especially when the 7700 XT and 7800 XT are so close in price.
@@ronnieburgess8060going by tomshardware gpu hierarchy, the 7700xt has a 15% lead over the 4060ti 16gb at 1080p ultra and 20%+ lead at 1440p ultra. Also, going by techpowerup’s listing of the 7700xt, it has a tdp of 245watts, not 300watts. Plus, in the US, regularly sells both the 7700xt and 4060ti 8gb, not 16gb, at the same prices.
@@ronnieburgess8060 LOL you lose your case as the 7700 XT uses 230W with the 4060 using 128W (see TPU review) with the 7700 XT being *50%* faster. Look up your numbers again, you got it way wrong.
this is nice but its also nice if u include 1440p so they can see the 4060ti is capable of 1440p most of the time with 60fps in some games and thats worth something.
they are really cute but one of the breeds that should require a lab animal permit. 25% of them will have to endure a lot of pain due to humans wanting a long dog shape.
@@auturgicflosculator2183 they are genetic experiment animals. cute as heck, got nothing against themselves but we really should phase out breeding animals we created painful problems for
nice, can you do a 1440p showdown between the 6700xt/6750xt or the 7700xt and the 3060ti/4060ti? They are the "budget" 1440p cards rn, with the 6700xt being the cheapest
@@Celatra unless you plan on paying 800+ there is no reason picking nvidia up unless you find a working 3080 for 350 ish somwhere ..... but thoose are rare deals so ehh .
Not really for gaming, the card isn't powerful enough to take advantage of that vram. For demanding work it could be a good card but for gaming the 16GB variety is just pointless. Several tests have shown that there's virtually no difference in gaming performance between the 8 and 16GB versions.
@Tomazack yeah nvidia has some weird priorities when including vram. My 3070 ti had 8gb of vram but a 3060 (ti) had 12gb. Luckily they did make the 4070 ti super a 16gb
@@wouterattheorganbecause the initial plan is to release 3070 16GB and 3080 20GB (to counter AMD 6800/6900 that have 16GB) before releasing 3060 12GB to the market. But mining happen. So they cancel the plan since miner only need the GPU to have 6GB to run etherium. Also nvidia need some insurance when the mining craze ended and used card start flooding the market. One of the reason AMD RDNA3 sales were sluggish were because there are tons of RX6000 series with 12GB to 16GB flood the used market.
I bought RTX 4060 for $245/£190 including Tax and Free shipping here in India during Diwali sale.. its good card for the price i paid.. upgraded from Gtx 1660S
@@blakegriplingph True, got really lucky with the deal, there were some crazy deals on PC parts this Diwali sale, also grabbed i5 12400f for $85/£66 including Tax
Where I live, you can easily get a used 6800XT/3080 for less than $400. The issue with the 4060/4060ti is the MSRP. Not to mention the absolutely murdered bandwidth speeds all the way up to the 4070TI Super lol
4060 at $300 is decent. But that is the cheapest 5nm class gpu you can find. Even if the card being named as 4050 the price will still be $300. This segment AMD did not even dare to use 5nm. 4060Ti 16GB price was expensive for pure gamer but the pricing has to count the semi pro card market. Everything above 4060Ti 16GB are like that. The 4070Ti have those 800++ price tag because of semi pro.
I picked up a 16GB one for only 300 USD locally from some dude who just offloaded parts that were ripped out of prebuilts. Works well, but that’s a unicorn deal for sure. If you can’t find it for dirt cheap, don’t even think about it lol just get the 3060 Ti
Hi, it'd be nice if you included a reading from a plug meter to shownpower consumption when doing graphics card videos and comparisons. There are smart plugs that let you output the data in excel
But even if the faster GPU uses the same power as the slower one, like a 7900xtx vs a vega 64, the faster GPU will have higher system power draw because of the cpu working harder.
@@vyor8837 It's still a nice-to-know thing even if it's not accurate down to a laboratory standard. Increased electrical consumption can play an important role in deciding the price to performance ratio of a card. Also comparing graphics cards from the same generation that are powerful enough to not max out and bottleneck the CPU probably won't impact CPU power usage as much as your quite unrealistic examples of 7900xtx and Vega 64, as I don't think this channel has ever or will ever have a reason to compare such vastly different GPUs. This isn't gamersnexus and gamersnexus doesn't even benchmark the vega 64 in new reviews...
The 4060ti with 16GB is basically the perfect card if you want to experiment with local llms and cuda for cheap, also with a slight memory and core overclock its really power efficent
Looking at the wattage of both cards during those comparisons, im curious if you overclocked the non Ti card to match the 140w of the Ti (since the non Ti was pulling around 110-120w) would you get much closer performance. If so, it could actually be better to get the non Ti version and simply overclock it. Alternatively, I'd be curious to see undervolting numbers. I'd like to see an undervolt on the non Ti version while boosting the clocks to see if its possible keep it stable and close the performance gap while pushing for efficency. Nice comparison video as always!
Dunno... its like 15-20 fps more for 100€/$ more, if at least they gave 12GB to the 4060 Ti instead of 8GB keeping the same 400$ price... it would maybe make it more worth it,(yes i know there is a 16GB version but it is just more vram and performance is almost the same as the 8GB variant for almost 500$/€).
5:00 Fortnite actually lets you watch the replay of a match and it will render it just as if you were playing the game in real time. To view replays, just go to the career tab in the main menu then replays are on the bottom right. Replays is the most accurate way to benchmark Fortnite.
The real problem with both 4060 is the VRAM ammount, even a bigger problem witb the Ti variant. The 4060 should have been sold with 12GB of VRAM, but 8GB "is enough" to use most of his power. While 8GB on the Ti model simply kills the card because at higher resolutions it struggles to keep up compared to what is able to do. Than put in account a 4060 8GB is "only" 300€ in my region, while a 4060Ti is almost 500€ (and both 16GB variants are 200€ more), the only logical thing to do is buy the base 4060 and save up money for a later 5070 16GB variant (that Nvidia will not provide).
Biggest problem is: cut down PCI-E lanes to 8 On older systems (with PCIE gen 3) this will be a huge bottleneck. It is not a card - for people wanna upgrade from "pascal" generation cards, just because this bottleneck. You can have 3070 (2nd hand) for same money - and this is better card across the board (if You ignore power usage and older generation raytracing engine)
Memmory line in that card make it impossible to effectively use more than +/- 8 Gb vram, in other side if in card would be better memmory line card would be cost about same price as 4070 maby a little (I mean really little) less, this will be repeat in next gen 5060
That part on starfield if it is always taxing the hardware in that area no matter what then it's probably the game engine loading in the next "chunk" as it were. Of course not sure if this is actually the case but it could be, it all depends if you get something similar going the otherway? It's quite common in large open areas to have this happen, it's a art to get seamless loading right.
I know it's probably a bit more effort but maybe display the maximum frame rate and the lowest (that's not the 0.1%) as well? It'd be interesting to see what they pump out as maximums
A 7700xt hellhound was the same price as a 4060ti ventus 2x 8gb. Ended up getting the 7700xt. I dont know why anybody would get the 4060ti over the 7700xt
Here in Germany the cheapest 4060 costs 289€ and the cheapest 4060 ti costs 380€ making it a huge gap, not just the ti/performance but its a budget changer. You can get a respectable motherboard with that gap only. In a budget oriented configuration.
Got my 4060 Ti last week, and I’m in love with it. It’s a good card with the wrong price, unfortunately. I’ve been using it to play some games at 4K since I have a 4K monitor, and most games can reach 50 FPS with no problem. At 4K, DLSS doesn’t make a big difference in image quality. Sadly, though, I couldn’t play Horizon Forbidden West-it barely hits 45 FPS most of the time, and entering a city makes the game drop to 25 FPS anywhere. I suspect it might be a VRAM issue, where the game tries to allocate some in the RAM, which causes the performance to break. Still, it’s a wonderful card when it comes to power consumption and temperatures; with a custom fan curve, mine barely hits 60°C / 140°F.
You could try allocating system ram to the GPU, I did on my 3060TI and I think it causes less of a frame rate drop when you go over the maximum amount of VRAM.
Unfortunately, this is due to the VRAM. 4K in DLSS performance shouldn't run much worse than 1080p natively. But 8GB is quite a bit. Try turning down the textures and other things. This reduces VRAM consumption and at the same time relieves the load on the GPU itself.
any reason you're neglecting dlss? i don't think there's any reason to go nvidia over amd if someone doesn't use dlss where performance necessitates it
Surprised that Starfield was only using 5-6 GB of VRAM. Would be nice if there's a setting to load more textures if you have more VRAM...might help with those Frame rate dips.
I noticed that in the games where the FPS difference between the two was smaller, the 4060 Ti was only using 115-130W instead of 160W while the 4060 was using 105-110W. Neither at max but the 4060 Ti much lower, I wonder what the bottleneck is. My guess is ROPs as the 4060 Ti has a greater shortage of ROPs than VRAM.
Historically, by the 3rd generation of a piece of hardware supporting a new feature, nvidia used to make it where it was then possible to run the feature smoothly on even a mid or basic tier card. DirectX 9, Shader Model 3, DirectX 10, PhysX, all those followed that trend. Ray tracing? We're in the 3rd gen of ray tracing support and it's still not worth turning on.
Holy shit, I just did some research about 4060 Ti last night and now you uploaded it. Awesome! Btw, 4060 Ti is like around $250 cheaper than 4070 in my country Edit: ^ 4060 Ti
Can someone advise me please Would it be a silly thing to upgrade to a 4060ti from my 1080ti I use my pc mainly for racing sims and euro truck etc I play at 4K Cpu is I5 10600k Many thanks
I really dont know what i will choose when i would purchase one of these cards. I think it depends on you budget... and how long you think you are able to use it. for use for only 2 years and dont play triple AAA games would go for the non TI. But if you think the use case is maybe longer TI version could be a better option.
I love my little 4060 Ti. Yes, I could have gotten a more powerful card, but I wanted something that was power efficient and did what I needed it to do: play games at 1080p and use the RTX video upscaling.
HAD they NOT cut corners they would have been very INTERESTING cards as they draw very few Watts and do not heat up. The price of Watts per hour is increasing world wide and the same goes for temperatures during summer season...
If you shop around on CEX, the RTX 4060 8GB Ti can be acquired for £290, none Ti model for £240 (Same manufacture). I think for £50 extra pounds, you get a lot more card. But you can also get the 16GB Ti model for £290 as well, that would be a more meaningful comparison as the extra RAM is free for shopping around.
This is something I’ve started very recently haha as I like to do fresh testing most of the time to account for driver updates and game patches that could potentially effect performance
Bought my RTX 4060 ti 8 gb on sale for 3499 sek or 251£ seemed like a no brainer to upgrade from my gtx 1660 super to this for that cost. Bought it June 27th this year during a stream a computer store in Sweden was doing, they were selling 50 i think i bought the 35th one within the first 5 minutes of that deal going live and i was Quick on that button lol. The 4060 ti 8 gb in Sweden is normally around 4800 sek or 345£ otherwise.
Personally I think both of these are great 1080p gaming cards, just like the 3060 and 3060Ti that came before it. I wouldn't use it for 1440p as you'll have to make serious visual sacrifices to keep a +60fps frame rate.
i bought my 3060ti for less than a 3060 was being sold for from CEX 🤣 top model of the 3060ti's too ( asus rog strix oc ) , still at the same price a year later , i haven't seen a gpu hold its value like that since the 1080ti
4/11(Nov)/2024 (using a sane Date Notation) In Mexico, Currently the 4060 averages 6600 - 7200 MXN. The 4060 Ti averages 10800 -11200 MX That's 40% price increase for 20% perfomance increase. Definitely not worth it.
It depends on what you plan to do with it, for what kind of case, for what kind of gaming... For instance, single fan 4060 is totally worth for an SFF / mini-ITX build, 1080p gaming. However, it is a piece of trash for full-size tower 4k gaming.
Just told my neighboor next door that I bought a RTX 4060 Ti, suddenly he took out a 12 gauge shotgun... I think i triggered his PTSD on my purchase.🤔🤔🤔
Oh wow I didn't realize that the difference was that big. But the real waste of money is the 4060 TI 8gb vs 16gb. Since the speed of the card can't utilize the extra memory.
Overall I'm very happy with my 4060TI, very cool an quiet. The price however, I wasn't quite so happy about. In a better world this card would be called 4050. But at the same time I feel the lower end 4050 should be a 75w card that would not need a cable.
40 series? Idk. I have a 4080 super. It is only a few % better than the 4080. It is cheaper, though. It really depends on the card and how nvidia wanted to save money again.
Biggest problem to these cards: 3070 still exist (on 2nd hand card market....) It is better card (if You don't mind higher power usage and older raytracung hardware) for similar money... When You have older MB (without PCIE gen 4) this difference will be bigger in favor to older card (3070)
The one thing that steered me away from the 4000 series is how they skimped on memory bandwidth to save money.
These cards are advertised as 1080p cards aren't they? To be fair, at that resolution 8gb VRAM is not unreasonable. We are only having problems because games just aren't being optimised enough at launch. It's the price that smarts.
I would prefer more VRAM though.
He is talking about bus width.
@@Manganizationeven the 4080 has downgraded memory bandwidth. 256bit from 320 on the 3080… 😴 Nvidia is aids
@@Manganizationbus width not vram
Bean counter moment
Tapped on video for dog, dog within first 10 seconds
10/10
😁
@@RandomGaminginHD We love the Doggos.
@@BigBossDLow Stir Fried, Baked or boiled ?
@@Haywood-Jablomie Alive
@@BigBossDLow You can't eat them alive, they might bite you. Next time you order Chinese food, ask for Gou Ro Mian. They will cook it properly for you. Add soy sauce for flavour. Thank me later
I always found it funny when people debate the TI on older cards because it's usually a 20% gain at most. So it's like buy a new card or get a 20% increase right. And rarely are new cards much more, example
2080ti vs 3080
The difference being 30 to 50 dollars.
Geez, I didn't expect to see you here. I have a 4070 Ti and it definitely was way more expensive than needed. $650 MSRP would've been pretty good. $800? Too much. But it's still a damn good 1440p card. Not a huge improvement from a 4070 though. But being on par with a 3090 Ti is damn good
So looking at prices in Germany currently (cheapest model) you're getting about 20% more performance for 37% more money (€100) when buying a 4060ti over a 4060.
Which mean you can pick a Radeon 7700xt for that price. Giving 4070 performance
The 7700xt uses upto 300w under full load and has an average performance gain of around 5 to 10% over the 4060.
The 4060 consumes 115w under full load.
I rest my case.
@@dexmiermaxime8583dawg what 4070 is like 15%\20% faster even faster in rt a 7800 XT would give you 4070 performance, that's the one you should buy especially when the 7700 XT and 7800 XT are so close in price.
@@ronnieburgess8060going by tomshardware gpu hierarchy, the 7700xt has a 15% lead over the 4060ti 16gb at 1080p ultra and 20%+ lead at 1440p ultra. Also, going by techpowerup’s listing of the 7700xt, it has a tdp of 245watts, not 300watts. Plus, in the US, regularly sells both the 7700xt and 4060ti 8gb, not 16gb, at the same prices.
@@ronnieburgess8060 LOL you lose your case as the 7700 XT uses 230W with the 4060 using 128W (see TPU review) with the 7700 XT being *50%* faster. Look up your numbers again, you got it way wrong.
this is nice but its also nice if u include 1440p so they can see the 4060ti is capable of 1440p most of the time with 60fps in some games and thats worth something.
Yeah will do a 1440p video soon :)
@@RandomGaminginHD great 👍👍
RandomGaminginQuadHD
I get about 100 fps with 1440p optimized settings in RDR2, really happy with the card tbh
I doubt performance is going to differ much, unless they opt for the 16gb vram version and purposely try to overload the vram on the 4060.
Showed up for the video card stuff, stayed for the pupper. :D Dachshunds are the best.
He’s a naughty little chap haha
@@RandomGaminginHDmy old man of a dog is half Schnauzer half Dachshund. I call his breed a Wiener Schnitzel lol
they are really cute but one of the breeds that should require a lab animal permit. 25% of them will have to endure a lot of pain due to humans wanting a long dog shape.
@LLPTV Yeah I know all about that. Thankfully I didn't have to deal with any of that. I had a mini dachshund and that boyo was the best. C:
@@auturgicflosculator2183 they are genetic experiment animals. cute as heck, got nothing against themselves but we really should phase out breeding animals we created painful problems for
Thanks for keeping up these awesome intros :-)
Great dog channel man, not sure about all that computer jazz
"Today we going to be comparing dachshund... I mean RTX 4060..." I just heard this happen in my head and had to get it out xD
nice, can you do a 1440p showdown between the 6700xt/6750xt or the 7700xt and the 3060ti/4060ti? They are the "budget" 1440p cards rn, with the 6700xt being the cheapest
Yet I played at 4K on my 6700 XT, 1440p wasn't enough of an upgrade for me.
6700xt is 4060 ti level and 6750xt is better, 7700xt is slightly lower performance than 4070 for 150-200 less
Amd cards are simply faster on the low end
@@Celatra unless you plan on paying 800+ there is no reason picking nvidia up unless you find a working 3080 for 350 ish somwhere ..... but thoose are rare deals so ehh .
the dog is 10 times more interesting than those cards.
If you ever want to do the same run in online games, you can do the digital foundry method of just using a replay and benchmarking that
imo the only reason to go for a 4060 Ti instead of the base one is the extra VRAM version of it but it's still quite a bit more expensive
Not really for gaming, the card isn't powerful enough to take advantage of that vram. For demanding work it could be a good card but for gaming the 16GB variety is just pointless. Several tests have shown that there's virtually no difference in gaming performance between the 8 and 16GB versions.
@Tomazack yeah nvidia has some weird priorities when including vram. My 3070 ti had 8gb of vram but a 3060 (ti) had 12gb. Luckily they did make the 4070 ti super a 16gb
@@wouterattheorganbecause the initial plan is to release 3070 16GB and 3080 20GB (to counter AMD 6800/6900 that have 16GB) before releasing 3060 12GB to the market. But mining happen. So they cancel the plan since miner only need the GPU to have 6GB to run etherium. Also nvidia need some insurance when the mining craze ended and used card start flooding the market. One of the reason AMD RDNA3 sales were sluggish were because there are tons of RX6000 series with 12GB to 16GB flood the used market.
@@arenzricodexd4409 only reason i went with a nvidia card is their superior dlss and ray tracing performance
@@Tomazack wrong, Hardware Unboxed tested it and in some games the difference is huge, you can easily hit it by putting higher quality textures
Love your videos, man.
The price difference don't justify 4060 ti
Would love to see 1440p comparison with DLSS on/off here and there
I bought RTX 4060 for $245/£190 including Tax and Free shipping here in India during Diwali sale.. its good card for the price i paid.. upgraded from Gtx 1660S
Lucky for you mate, that's way cheaper than how much the 4060 costs in my place.
@@blakegriplingph True, got really lucky with the deal, there were some crazy deals on PC parts this Diwali sale, also grabbed i5 12400f for $85/£66 including Tax
@@prasadm6238 Enjoy! :)
Where I live, you can easily get a used 6800XT/3080 for less than $400. The issue with the 4060/4060ti is the MSRP.
Not to mention the absolutely murdered bandwidth speeds all the way up to the 4070TI Super lol
4060 at $300 is decent. But that is the cheapest 5nm class gpu you can find. Even if the card being named as 4050 the price will still be $300. This segment AMD did not even dare to use 5nm. 4060Ti 16GB price was expensive for pure gamer but the pricing has to count the semi pro card market. Everything above 4060Ti 16GB are like that. The 4070Ti have those 800++ price tag because of semi pro.
I picked up a 16GB one for only 300 USD locally from some dude who just offloaded parts that were ripped out of prebuilts. Works well, but that’s a unicorn deal for sure. If you can’t find it for dirt cheap, don’t even think about it lol just get the 3060 Ti
Hi, it'd be nice if you included a reading from a plug meter to shownpower consumption when doing graphics card videos and comparisons. There are smart plugs that let you output the data in excel
Thanks, I’ll look into it
But even if the faster GPU uses the same power as the slower one, like a 7900xtx vs a vega 64, the faster GPU will have higher system power draw because of the cpu working harder.
@@vyor8837 It's still a nice-to-know thing even if it's not accurate down to a laboratory standard. Increased electrical consumption can play an important role in deciding the price to performance ratio of a card.
Also comparing graphics cards from the same generation that are powerful enough to not max out and bottleneck the CPU probably won't impact CPU power usage as much as your quite unrealistic examples of 7900xtx and Vega 64, as I don't think this channel has ever or will ever have a reason to compare such vastly different GPUs. This isn't gamersnexus and gamersnexus doesn't even benchmark the vega 64 in new reviews...
@zues121510 I mean, it happened in that gen. The vega 56 and the 1080ti have very similar power draw.
@vyor8837 That's a very niche example. Don't think it's nearly enough of a reason to not include power draw.
The 4060ti with 16GB is basically the perfect card if you want to experiment with local llms and cuda for cheap, also with a slight memory and core overclock its really power efficent
Looking at the wattage of both cards during those comparisons, im curious if you overclocked the non Ti card to match the 140w of the Ti (since the non Ti was pulling around 110-120w) would you get much closer performance. If so, it could actually be better to get the non Ti version and simply overclock it. Alternatively, I'd be curious to see undervolting numbers. I'd like to see an undervolt on the non Ti version while boosting the clocks to see if its possible keep it stable and close the performance gap while pushing for efficency.
Nice comparison video as always!
Dunno... its like 15-20 fps more for 100€/$ more, if at least they gave 12GB to the 4060 Ti instead of 8GB keeping the same 400$ price... it would maybe make it more worth it,(yes i know there is a 16GB version but it is just more vram and performance is almost the same as the 8GB variant for almost 500$/€).
5:00 Fortnite actually lets you watch the replay of a match and it will render it just as if you were playing the game in real time. To view replays, just go to the career tab in the main menu then replays are on the bottom right. Replays is the most accurate way to benchmark Fortnite.
The real problem with both 4060 is the VRAM ammount, even a bigger problem witb the Ti variant.
The 4060 should have been sold with 12GB of VRAM, but 8GB "is enough" to use most of his power. While 8GB on the Ti model simply kills the card because at higher resolutions it struggles to keep up compared to what is able to do.
Than put in account a 4060 8GB is "only" 300€ in my region, while a 4060Ti is almost 500€ (and both 16GB variants are 200€ more), the only logical thing to do is buy the base 4060 and save up money for a later 5070 16GB variant (that Nvidia will not provide).
Biggest problem is: cut down PCI-E lanes to 8
On older systems (with PCIE gen 3) this will be a huge bottleneck.
It is not a card - for people wanna upgrade from "pascal" generation cards, just because this bottleneck.
You can have 3070 (2nd hand) for same money - and this is better card across the board (if You ignore power usage and older generation raytracing engine)
The only logical thing is to stay away from nvidia
Memmory line in that card make it impossible to effectively use more than +/- 8 Gb vram, in other side if in card would be better memmory line card would be cost about same price as 4070 maby a little (I mean really little) less, this will be repeat in next gen 5060
That part on starfield if it is always taxing the hardware in that area no matter what then it's probably the game engine loading in the next "chunk" as it were.
Of course not sure if this is actually the case but it could be, it all depends if you get something similar going the otherway?
It's quite common in large open areas to have this happen, it's a art to get seamless loading right.
I know it's probably a bit more effort but maybe display the maximum frame rate and the lowest (that's not the 0.1%) as well? It'd be interesting to see what they pump out as maximums
A 7700xt hellhound was the same price as a 4060ti ventus 2x 8gb. Ended up getting the 7700xt. I dont know why anybody would get the 4060ti over the 7700xt
would be nice to see one with a normal card and a super card.
No nonsense review. Tx
Here in Germany the cheapest 4060 costs 289€ and the cheapest 4060 ti costs 380€ making it a huge gap, not just the ti/performance but its a budget changer. You can get a respectable motherboard with that gap only. In a budget oriented configuration.
same here in Mexico the 4060 is $349 and the 4060 Ti is $489 its a massive difference
WOW how about the resizeble bar . Need to know what do you think about that ?
Would be interesting to see the RX7600 vs the RTX 4060
Could you please do a video about comparasion to a 3070?
5:35 You can use replay
Got my 4060 Ti last week, and I’m in love with it. It’s a good card with the wrong price, unfortunately. I’ve been using it to play some games at 4K since I have a 4K monitor, and most games can reach 50 FPS with no problem. At 4K, DLSS doesn’t make a big difference in image quality. Sadly, though, I couldn’t play Horizon Forbidden West-it barely hits 45 FPS most of the time, and entering a city makes the game drop to 25 FPS anywhere. I suspect it might be a VRAM issue, where the game tries to allocate some in the RAM, which causes the performance to break. Still, it’s a wonderful card when it comes to power consumption and temperatures; with a custom fan curve, mine barely hits 60°C / 140°F.
same. it is quite bad for the price but i got mine for like 300 USD, which was cheaper that the 7700xt i was looking at
You could try allocating system ram to the GPU, I did on my 3060TI and I think it causes less of a frame rate drop when you go over the maximum amount of VRAM.
Yeah vram problem. Personally run it on 1440p maxed settings no dlss and it slurps quite some vram
Unfortunately, this is due to the VRAM. 4K in DLSS performance shouldn't run much worse than 1080p natively. But 8GB is quite a bit. Try turning down the textures and other things. This reduces VRAM consumption and at the same time relieves the load on the GPU itself.
@RudiRatte-v1p they just need to increase vram amount on newer cards
any reason you're neglecting dlss? i don't think there's any reason to go nvidia over amd if someone doesn't use dlss where performance necessitates it
Surprised that Starfield was only using 5-6 GB of VRAM. Would be nice if there's a setting to load more textures if you have more VRAM...might help with those Frame rate dips.
Just got 4060 TI great card for free... now my RX 6600 non xt can get some rest... Btw great video m8
I noticed that in the games where the FPS difference between the two was smaller, the 4060 Ti was only using 115-130W instead of 160W while the 4060 was using 105-110W. Neither at max but the 4060 Ti much lower, I wonder what the bottleneck is. My guess is ROPs as the 4060 Ti has a greater shortage of ROPs than VRAM.
Please add the temperature for these models.
I think if you want good price to performance then you should buy the oh look doggo
I think you can use the replay function in fortnite, and basically create a benchmark which you can repeat with other cards to see the difference.
wait... i don't get it...
basically left side is a gpu without vram? srsly?
Wrong pronunciation we all know its tie
More like thhhai
no it's "tee"
thigh
Thanks, Steve!
Tee-eye is the correct way to say it.
1,5 Year ago I get myself RX 6700 for 250 Euro usually land between this GPU
Doggo's name, please? What a cute little fellow.
Randomdoggoinhd
The cute little dachshund needs to be part of the table top hardware clips, white shoes style. More dachshund please.
There's something that's been bugging me and I've just figured it out.. RGHD looks a bit like Henry from KCD.
So when will you launch your new channel "RandomPettinginHD"?
Historically, by the 3rd generation of a piece of hardware supporting a new feature, nvidia used to make it where it was then possible to run the feature smoothly on even a mid or basic tier card.
DirectX 9, Shader Model 3, DirectX 10, PhysX, all those followed that trend.
Ray tracing? We're in the 3rd gen of ray tracing support and it's still not worth turning on.
What is wrong with modern games optimization?
can you oc the normal 4060? would be interesting what happens if you allowed more power!
Holy shit, I just did some research about 4060 Ti last night and now you uploaded it. Awesome!
Btw, 4060 Ti is like around $250 cheaper than 4070 in my country
Edit: ^ 4060 Ti
That's about msrp, 4060 $300 and 4070 $550
@reksio_xyt8733 my bad, I was supposed to say *4060 Ti
these 4060s in 1080 are holding up to my 3080fe in 1440. Very curious to see how they do in 1440 esp in the 50-60 fps titles like starfield
Show me anything from any generation that does what the 4060 does @115w, scaled.
we used to be able to overclock for those gains
Is the Jack Russel doggo not with us anymore? 😢
this is only raster comparison, could you do RT?
Can someone advise me please
Would it be a silly thing to upgrade to a 4060ti from my 1080ti
I use my pc mainly for racing sims and euro truck etc
I play at 4K
Cpu is I5 10600k
Many thanks
I really dont know what i will choose when i would purchase one of these cards. I think it depends on you budget... and how long you think you are able to use it.
for use for only 2 years and dont play triple AAA games would go for the non TI.
But if you think the use case is maybe longer TI version could be a better option.
I love my little 4060 Ti. Yes, I could have gotten a more powerful card, but I wanted something that was power efficient and did what I needed it to do: play games at 1080p and use the RTX video upscaling.
Yeah it certainly offers a fantastic power/efficiency ratio
How about 4060ti 16gb?
HAD they NOT cut corners they would have been very INTERESTING cards as they draw very few Watts and do not heat up. The price of Watts per hour is increasing world wide and the same goes for temperatures during summer season...
the 20fps avg difference is big ngl especially if u have a 120hz or above monitor it will make the difference
Your dog looks a like mine, except the her darker brown is darker then yours by a little bit. Its a even darker chocolate brown.
If you shop around on CEX, the RTX 4060 8GB Ti can be acquired for £290, none Ti model for £240 (Same manufacture). I think for £50 extra pounds, you get a lot more card. But you can also get the 16GB Ti model for £290 as well, that would be a more meaningful comparison as the extra RAM is free for shopping around.
Those 16 gigs with memory band with only 128 bit won't do much
Better off with something else for £290 honestly
Or just get an used 3080 instead of these overpriced mid-end cards.
why get a 4060ti when you can get a 7700xt for the same price?
you can get them new in the £240 region now, seen them quite a lot lately
I have a question! Do you store the stats of every benchmark you do? Like in a excel sheet or smthng? If so you probably have a very big database!
This is something I’ve started very recently haha as I like to do fresh testing most of the time to account for driver updates and game patches that could potentially effect performance
@@RandomGaminginHD yeah good point, thanks for the info!
I’d love to see a 1440p test!
Was this the OC version of both cards or Non OC?
Just listen when he introduces the cards.. He said both are oc
00:01 This one - GoodBoyDawgTX - need no comparison. Completely blew away the competition 😍
Bought my RTX 4060 ti 8 gb on sale for 3499 sek or 251£ seemed like a no brainer to upgrade from my gtx 1660 super to this for that cost.
Bought it June 27th this year during a stream a computer store in Sweden was doing, they were selling 50 i think i bought the 35th one within the first 5 minutes of that deal going live and i was Quick on that button lol.
The 4060 ti 8 gb in Sweden is normally around 4800 sek or 345£ otherwise.
Personally I think both of these are great 1080p gaming cards, just like the 3060 and 3060Ti that came before it. I wouldn't use it for 1440p as you'll have to make serious visual sacrifices to keep a +60fps frame rate.
for fortnite testing just use the replay system (if they still exist)
i bought my 3060ti for less than a 3060 was being sold for from CEX 🤣 top model of the 3060ti's too ( asus rog strix oc ) , still at the same price a year later , i haven't seen a gpu hold its value like that since the 1080ti
4/11(Nov)/2024 (using a sane Date Notation)
In Mexico, Currently the 4060 averages 6600 - 7200 MXN.
The 4060 Ti averages 10800 -11200 MX
That's 40% price increase for 20% perfomance increase.
Definitely not worth it.
im thinking of buying a single fan version of 4060, will it be worth?
It depends on what you plan to do with it, for what kind of case, for what kind of gaming... For instance, single fan 4060 is totally worth for an SFF / mini-ITX build, 1080p gaming. However, it is a piece of trash for full-size tower 4k gaming.
In a blind test would you be able to tell the difference between them ?
For sure not.
Heyy RG please make a video on RX6500m it's one of the most affordable laptop gpu at the time in India I wish you could test this
on fortnite you can use replay mode when benchmarking so that its the exact same match 😄
In overall it's not 4060 vs 4060Ti, its 4050Ti vs 4060 but specially named a step higher to increase their price
id have been interested in your opinion.
1440p please! Its slowly becoming the new minimum standard, might as well include the data too.
I would like to see a 3060 rtx 12 gb vs the 4060ti 8gb
Bethesda needs a slap tbh
What a good guy starting off the video by showing us his wiener.
What happened to the little Jack Russel ?
A different youtuber corrected me by telling me this is pronounced Tie, like the fighter, lol :)
Wonder how the 16 gig version is going to age.
Just told my neighboor next door that I bought a RTX 4060 Ti, suddenly he took out a 12 gauge shotgun... I think i triggered his PTSD on my purchase.🤔🤔🤔
Why 0.1% low is so low in Fornite? They are far away from VRAM limit? In rest of the games, it seems fine.
Oh wow I didn't realize that the difference was that big. But the real waste of money is the 4060 TI 8gb vs 16gb. Since the speed of the card can't utilize the extra memory.
Does the dog lift his leg for these nv cards?
Great 😮
Overall I'm very happy with my 4060TI, very cool an quiet. The price however, I wasn't quite so happy about. In a better world this card would be called 4050. But at the same time I feel the lower end 4050 should be a 75w card that would not need a cable.
Usually you are on a murdering spree in Starfield. LOL.
Say what you will about the 4060, the performance it delivers at ~100 watts still amazes me.
40 series? Idk. I have a 4080 super. It is only a few % better than the 4080. It is cheaper, though.
It really depends on the card and how nvidia wanted to save money again.
Biggest problem to these cards:
3070 still exist (on 2nd hand card market....)
It is better card (if You don't mind higher power usage and older raytracung hardware) for similar money...
When You have older MB (without PCIE gen 4) this difference will be bigger in favor to older card (3070)
If the Ti had more VRAM, even just 2GB, then maybe. As it is, I don't see the performance difference worth the extra money.