Thanks for this Jason and Tom. Well done. Mostly. Really like the back and forth between Jason and Tom. Both of you add very good insights to this game. The thing that keeps me from watching more of these "Every Game is Awesome" videos is that it is billed as a "Jason Levine series" and so expected Jason to be the main person. However Tom is the one that does most of the talking, game description, etc. So, yeah, a bit bummed that this is not really a "Jason Levine series".
destrio I think you missed the point. We aren't saying they shouldn't do them together, we just wish Jason took the lead. This doesn't feel like "a Jason Levine series" so much as a "Tom Vasel series with Jason"
Most likely because Jason pick the games for the series it is his idea but don't have a problem letting Tom introduce the game. Perhaps because Jason thinks Tom will do that part better than him.
Tom said it was not one of his favorites.... I wonder what came to mind for him on a preferred game of this style. He looked like he had a specific game in mind.
It looks like a good game but I think that the LED game is much better, it has more depth. boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/149927/led-logica-estrategia-deduccion
![PURPEECH - นี่ฉันเองคนที่... (It's me) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NuhHd0hOOg8/mqdefault.jpg)
I love how Tom accidentally knocks over the tiles on the rack and doesn't miss a beat. Here's a very busy man who has done a lot of reviews.
Thanks for this Jason and Tom. Well done. Mostly. Really like the back and forth between Jason and Tom. Both of you add very good insights to this game. The thing that keeps me from watching more of these "Every Game is Awesome" videos is that it is billed as a "Jason Levine series" and so expected Jason to be the main person. However Tom is the one that does most of the talking, game description, etc. So, yeah, a bit bummed that this is not really a "Jason Levine series".
Agreed.
I actually think these reviews are best with them as a duo. they can respond to each other's questions and comments that enriches the review
destrio I think you missed the point. We aren't saying they shouldn't do them together, we just wish Jason took the lead. This doesn't feel like "a Jason Levine series" so much as a "Tom Vasel series with Jason"
Most likely because Jason pick the games for the series it is his idea but don't have a problem letting Tom introduce the game. Perhaps because Jason thinks Tom will do that part better than him.
The 'Ingenious Puzzles' Jason mentions is called Simply Ingenious (Einfach Genial) on BGG
Still one of our favourite games!
Tom said it was not one of his favorites.... I wonder what came to mind for him on a preferred game of this style. He looked like he had a specific game in mind.
Qwirkle meets Gemblo.
My partner loves this game. The kids groan when she plays because this is her go to game
The box says 1 to 4, so there is probably a solo variant also?
I prefer my copy Ingenious Puzzles which Jason mentions..
Try "Qin".
It looks like a good game but I think that the LED game is much better, it has more depth. boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/149927/led-logica-estrategia-deduccion