Flew a a350-1000 from Manchester to Orlando and back. We had some nasty weather above Orlando and Canada so climbed quickly to 40,000ft. Plane took a good few hits from the turbulence, dropping and climbing but nailed it. I’d feel incredibly safe to fly these again.
With respect A350-1000 is next-level compared to B777-300ER. This aircraft will be relevant for many years to come & will limit to great affect B777X sales due to it`s lightness, fuel efficiency, & size.
@@ImperialDiecastthe 787-10 isn't even in the same class as A35K, actually none of the 787s are in the same class as the A350. The only overlap is A350-900 against B787-10 but A350-900 outclassed the 787-10 in every way
There must be a guy like me in every plane in America. I'm the guy who can get if for you; cigarettes, a bag of reefer, if that's your thing, a bottle of brandy to celebrate your kid's high school graduation, darn near anything within reason.
la vidéo nous indique un prix de 400 millions de $ pour un airbus A350-1000, à coté il y a une vidéo de FrenchBee qui montre un airbus A350-1000 qui part d'Orly pour la Réunion avec 10 passagers, l'avion est pratiquement vide ??? ça n'a pas de sens. Il faut conseiller à Airbus et à Rolls Royce de concevoir des avions capables de faire Paris-St Denis de la Réunion avec une taille limitée à 50 passagers !!!
Flew an a350 from jfk to Seoul Asiana 15 hours landed at 330 am New York time and I was able to work for 8 hours without feeling drained..the cabin is not bone dry the engines are quiet will always find an a350 for Long haul from now..Boeing is just a joke run by junior varsity high school accountants..they build planes to be cute and get social media attention instead of sturdy and practical..look at the 787 flex wings now you are seeing almost all the aircraft reporting heavy turbulence at high altitude and landing are Dreamliners why? Between this and the 737 max which needs software built to fly the space shuttle to fly correctly at takeoff without stalling and crashing into the ground no thank you
You do realize that the more flexible the wings are the more study, cooler, aero efficient they are, the 787 is as quiet or quieter than the a350, just look at those convex engines designs, boeing is still a great company but they’ve just had bad leadership in the past 20 years and that’s looking to change, just look at how successful the 777 program was. Flight experience doesn’t come from the airframe only it comes from the airline and their service.
Flew with the A350-900 i must say that i was impressed from the airplane. Great work from Airbus.
Flew a a350-1000 from Manchester to Orlando and back. We had some nasty weather above Orlando and Canada so climbed quickly to 40,000ft. Plane took a good few hits from the turbulence, dropping and climbing but nailed it. I’d feel incredibly safe to fly these again.
This is an absolutely beautiful plane! 👏👏👏
The greatest rival of the 777-300ER.
With respect A350-1000 is next-level compared to B777-300ER. This aircraft will be relevant for many years to come & will limit to great affect B777X sales due to it`s lightness, fuel efficiency, & size.
more like the greatest rival to the 787-10
@@ImperialDiecastthe 787-10 isn't even in the same class as A35K, actually none of the 787s are in the same class as the A350. The only overlap is A350-900 against B787-10 but A350-900 outclassed the 787-10 in every way
Upcoming 777X will be probably better in many aspects including its GE9X engine.@@stoje8405
@@edwardwilcox6606yea but airlines do seem to love the fact that the 777 carries more
There must be a guy like me in every plane in America. I'm the guy who can get if for you; cigarettes, a bag of reefer, if that's your thing, a bottle of brandy to celebrate your kid's high school graduation, darn near anything within reason.
Nice Red!😅🤣😂
🌹My niece works as structural engineer in this bus
That's awesome!
I’ll take it
❤ AIRBUS!
I'll take 2
Wow
la vidéo nous indique un prix de 400 millions de $ pour un airbus A350-1000, à coté il y a une vidéo de FrenchBee qui montre un airbus A350-1000 qui part d'Orly pour la Réunion avec 10 passagers, l'avion est pratiquement vide ??? ça n'a pas de sens. Il faut conseiller à Airbus et à Rolls Royce de concevoir des avions capables de faire Paris-St Denis de la Réunion avec une taille limitée à 50 passagers !!!
Flew an a350 from jfk to Seoul Asiana 15 hours landed at 330 am New York time and I was able to work for 8 hours without feeling drained..the cabin is not bone dry the engines are quiet will always find an a350 for Long haul from now..Boeing is just a joke run by junior varsity high school accountants..they build planes to be cute and get social media attention instead of sturdy and practical..look at the 787 flex wings now you are seeing almost all the aircraft reporting heavy turbulence at high altitude and landing are Dreamliners why? Between this and the 737 max which needs software built to fly the space shuttle to fly correctly at takeoff without stalling and crashing into the ground no thank you
You do realize that the more flexible the wings are the more study, cooler, aero efficient they are, the 787 is as quiet or quieter than the a350, just look at those convex engines designs, boeing is still a great company but they’ve just had bad leadership in the past 20 years and that’s looking to change, just look at how successful the 777 program was. Flight experience doesn’t come from the airframe only it comes from the airline and their service.
If they will limit air travel .....why big airplane??
By replacing economy with business class throughout. Only the wef asskissers will have permission to fly, unless we stop their mad agenda
What the fuck are you talking about
i want the engines to be noisy so i can take the loudest dump in the toilets.
😂
Saying first so kids can’t say it
😂
😄
They just created another 777, 787. 😂
Japan just destroyed one .
It was an a350-900
Wdym it was an b787
say what?? WTF details i can't find info
@@Duolingo_Spanisit was a airbus a350-900
Well it served its purpose by protecting the passengers