He did that on BPRP’s channel (and the follow up on Peyam’s channel was ln(ln(ln(x)))). Was it his first featured video with BPRP? th-cam.com/video/w6VGTn706zU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=l5RHcs9m42pRf8oV
That video was one of the very first batch of videos we filmed together while he was also in SoCal back in 2017. Wow, I feel so nostalgic now. Thank you two for being such long-time fans; I really appreciate that!
If you know that the entire expression is the derivative of e^e^e^e^x, you can just plug it as an indefinite integral directly into Newton-Leibnitz with limits 0 and 1, without the substitution, to the same result
@@yuriiherbenko8381 No need to explicitely mention this. It is known that an integral that has limits of integration (i.e. a definite integral) does not require the addition of a constant
@@yuriiherbenko8381 indefinite integral is only when you don’t see any numbers above and below the integral sign. If u see numbers above and below the integral, it is a definite integral, where the answer is just a number and not a function
Try this next: th-cam.com/video/nF0PgJDk7_M/w-d-xo.html
What gives people feelings of power:
- Money
- Status
- Solving a BMT question without hint
Such a satisfying integral.
Reminds me of Dr peyam because I remember e^e^e^…^e^x was one of his favourite derivatives with such a satisfying answer.
He did that on BPRP’s channel (and the follow up on Peyam’s channel was ln(ln(ln(x)))). Was it his first featured video with BPRP? th-cam.com/video/w6VGTn706zU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=l5RHcs9m42pRf8oV
That video was one of the very first batch of videos we filmed together while he was also in SoCal back in 2017. Wow, I feel so nostalgic now. Thank you two for being such long-time fans; I really appreciate that!
fun fact: the answer has 1.65 million digits
Left of the decimal point. 😊
If you know that the entire expression is the derivative of e^e^e^e^x, you can just plug it as an indefinite integral directly into Newton-Leibnitz with limits 0 and 1, without the substitution, to the same result
Even simpler: Integral di e^f(x) * f’(x) is just always e^f(x). (Where in this case f(x) is eee^x
So good!
Dr peyam did a video on it I think years ago
I wonder, are there specific tetration rules regarding integration? Maybe could use them here
The sans Integral
e^e^e^e-e^e^e
take a drink every time he says "e to the"
Yeah, this one is obvious, Chen Lu all the way
"how many e's you want to say?"
e
saw this in my course book lol
⁴e-³e
You know you don't do much math when what you see is Seeeex....
More asians in that room than even I would have guessed
Damn
nice
Cool
Approximately 1.5*10^1,000,000😂 you can't display it on Desmos
i did three subs but damn, i didn't notice i could just sub once for rest.
This video makes me feel like
th-cam.com/video/dfdGd31gNjI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=CeKvi-fju3IuarKv
e
what a fun and elegant solution :)
Plus C
It’s a definite integral. There’s no +c
Shouldn't it be told in the vid?
@@yuriiherbenko8381 No need to explicitely mention this. It is known that an integral that has limits of integration (i.e. a definite integral) does not require the addition of a constant
@@ro_sgrif it's so obvious, why there's an emphasis on 'plus C' in every video with indefinite integrals at "brbp calculus basics"?
I -- integrity.😂
@@yuriiherbenko8381 indefinite integral is only when you don’t see any numbers above and below the integral sign.
If u see numbers above and below the integral, it is a definite integral, where the answer is just a number and not a function
3:50 Student after this: *failed due to forgetting "+ C"*
It's a definite integral though
this comment is the reason why you shouldn't sleep on your calculus class
Nope
I think you failed by putting +C on a definite integral
e