Oh my sweet lord thank you. You're my savior ... I'm trying to wrap my head around participation in crime and you cleared the air of doubt around it. Please do more explanatory videos on complex areas of law :D would love to see a video on the differences between the defense of insanity and the partial defense of diminished responsibility.
Test of foresight is interesting when one or more defendants has a diagnosed/undiagnosed learning disability / neurodevelopmental disorder. This clinical population often present with cognitive deficits in this respect. See also “theory of mind” deficit, where the defendant was unable to infer the thoughts and intentions of those involved.
being lawyer and practicing criminal cases the crux of this good lecture is when the common intention is established between principal accused and the accomplice so both are responsible on equal footing be punished with same punishment.
cant say that "i' was complicite in this with how many times that i have begged law enforcement for help,.... even sending multipule letters to the s.a.
Oh my sweet lord thank you. You're my savior ... I'm trying to wrap my head around participation in crime and you cleared the air of doubt around it. Please do more explanatory videos on complex areas of law :D would love to see a video on the differences between the defense of insanity and the partial defense of diminished responsibility.
Wow you did an excellent job in explaining this
Thank you Dr Dyson!
Test of foresight is interesting when one or more defendants has a diagnosed/undiagnosed learning disability / neurodevelopmental disorder.
This clinical population often present with cognitive deficits in this respect. See also “theory of mind” deficit, where the defendant was unable to infer the thoughts and intentions of those involved.
being lawyer and practicing criminal cases the crux of this good lecture is when the common intention is established between principal accused and the accomplice so both are responsible on equal footing be punished with same punishment.
cant say that "i' was complicite in this with how many times that i have begged law enforcement for help,....
even sending multipule letters to the s.a.
I like this.Thank You.
very insightful
The Court of Final Appeal in Chan Kam Shing held in 2016 does not follow this Supreme Court decision
No audio, guys, really?
good explanation but damn why do you speak so fast
1984, eh?
haha
This is why privi council has to go