I got 86% in my June Exam, grade 12 all thanks to the goat Miss Angler. Thank you so much for existing coz you explain way better than my current LS teacher and he always says that you tube teachers are not good for us, and you madam have proved him wrong🔥🔥🔥
As a PhD student in Wireless Communications who wants to understand the background behind Evolutionary Computation and Multiobjective Optimization with Genetic Algorithms (topics primarily inspired by life science(s)), I find this material excellent, simple, and straightforward. It is designed not only for preparing for examinations but also for enriching the curiosity of knowledge seekers, even those outside this field. If I were to put Miss Angler's material into words, I'd say it's the "Art of Simplicity"...
Miss Angler we appreciate your informative lessons,they really help,I'll be rewriting in June,and I've found these videos very helpful,I understand the chapter a lot better now.🙏🙏
Same I got level 2 last time but Im rewriting in June and I could already tell that I will get a lot more than level 2. These videos are so helpful especially for us who cant afford extra/private lessons.
Here is what I see has happened to many who have been seduced by Darwinism. You were taught certain fundamental truths as a youth. You were instructed in the sciences, in mathematics, physics, geography, history and biology by teachers whom you respected as a youth, whom you admired and looked up to. And because as an impressionable youth you admired, respected and looked up to these people, and much of what they taught you was true, when they introduced the Darwinian theory of evolution to you, sort of slipping it in with algebra, chemistry, biology and astronomy - the classical sciences, then you accepted it also without reservation, you didn't question it, you swallowed it whole since these people were your mentors and you trusted them, almost revered them. Usually it was introduced to you in science class with some Disney like animation showing lightening striking an ancient pond, then cells emerging, then fish swimming in a sea before they crawled out onto land and lost their scales and became amphibians that became reptiles that became birds and mammals that became monkeys that became humans. It was all very skillfully done, and there was usually very little actual science involved; you were told a story, much like a Sunday school Noah's Ark story, only this story left out God of course, and because it was in science class it must have been true. It never occured to you that your teachers who told you that evolution was a fact as real as the Laws of Gravity might have themselves been deceived in their youth when they were in science class, and then they introduced that very same deception into your life, all with the very best of intentions. So you accepted evolution as being as legitimate as all of the other sciences, your teachers certainly wouldn't lie to you, and then over the course of time it became your Weltanschauung. As time progressed and you grew older, a sort of intellectual pride clouded your worldview, and also affected, or more precisely infected your understanding of earth's history, of man's origin; and you became too sophisticated to believe in the straight, literal truth of Genesis. In your youthful hubris you substituted Darwin for Moses. Over the course of time Darwinism became more entrenched in your mind. It became a dogma; it was your world view through which you interpreted reality. Part of this springs from Hellenism, the Greek philosophy that is the cornerstone of much of modern thought.
Much has been said by historians of Darwin's observations of the finches on the Galapagos islands while sailing on the Beagle, but little is mentioned of another incident Darwin had with some less fortunate birds on a different island during his voyage. We have three accounts of an excursion made by Darwin and the Captain from the Beagle to St. Paul's Rocks between the Cape Verde Islands and the coast of Brazil. First we shall read Darwin's version of the episode: " We found on St. Paul's only two kinds of birds-the booby and the noddy. The former is a species of Gannet, and the latter a tern. Both are of a tame and stupid disposition, and are so unaccustomed to visitors, that I could have killed any number of them with my geologic hammer." The Voyage of Charles Darwin, Charles Darwin, pp.10, The American Museum of Natural History, The Natural History Library, Anchor Books, Doubleday & Co., Inc., Garden City New York, 1962. Browne mentioned the appalling incident in her biography of Darwin: " Uninhabited except for dense flocks of seafowl, and previously unvisited by any scientific recorder, they were an alluring target for a restless naval man and an eager friend . . . Darwin and Fitzroy had a marvelous time of it, whooping and killing birds with abandon". Browne, pp.204. See also the original, Narrative of the Surveying Voyage of H.M.S. Adventure and Beagle, Vol. 2:56. Fitzroy recorded the bloody scene in his personal narrative as well. According to him, one of the seamen asked if he could borrow Darwin's hammer to kill some of the birds with, to which Darwin replied, "No, no, you'll break the handle." Then, apparently struck by the novelty of this idea, Darwin himself picked up his hammer and began killing the peaceful birds in this manner, as Fitzroy related "away went the hammer, with all the force of his own right arm." Narrative of the Voyages of the Adventure and Beagle, by Admiral Fitzroy, 1839. See also Amabel Williams Ellis, "The Voyage of the Beagle, Adapted from the Narratives and letters of Charles Darwin and Captain Fitzroy, pp. 26, J.B. Lippencott Co., Philadelphia and London, 1931.
The phylogenetic tree is actually a myth. It is an artifact of evolutionist imagination. The branches are drawn in to represent what is supposedly millions of years of transitional links, but in reality all that we have are the roots and the top rungs of the tree. The millions of years of transitional links that the branches are supposed to represent don't actually exist in the fossil record, they have never been found.
@@wooe David Raup, paleontologist and curator of the Chicago Field Museum: 'ironically we have even fewer examples of transitional [fossils] than we did in Darwin's day' (Because most have been debunked - as adolescents, deformation or simply different animals with no ancestral connection.)
@@SteveLomas-k6k When you Google that quote you'll get a long list of conspiracy sites like Answers in Genesis and similar. Your second claim also match what they tend to lie about. Just a tip: If you want to read about biology, read stuff from professionals in the related fields. Theists isn't included in that group. I don't know about you but when I need to check my teeth I visit the dentist and not the plumber. You should apply the same thing when it comes to this topic.
@@wooe? David Raup was one of the most qualified paleontologists on the planet. Not a pop-science TV/book celeb like Dawkins, Nye or Degrasse-Tyson! Raup was dean of paleontology at the university of Chicago, before becoming curator of the Chicago Field Museum, one of the most esteemed natural history museums in the world (of Sue the dinosaur fame) I used to live nearby and visited many times. This was one of many similar quotes from a paper he wrote titled 'conflicts between Darwin and Paleontology'- I've no idea if it's on 'answers in Genesis' but they have every right to quote him also. In fact it's quite telling isn't it, that the valid opinions of one of the world's most foremost paleontologists are NOT to be found on more well known pop-science sites. As Raup said, much of what has crept into evolutionary literature is pure fiction.
@@wooe? David Raup was one of the most qualified paleontologists on the planet. Not a pop-science TV/book celeb like Dawkins, Nye, Degrasse-Tyson! Raup was dean of paleontology at the university of Chicago, before curator of the Chicago Field Museum, one of the most esteemed natural history museums in the world (of Sue the dinosaur fame) I used to live nearby and visited many times. This was one of many similar quotes from a paper he wrote titled 'conflicts between Darwin and Paleontology'- I've no idea if it's on 'answers in Genesis' but they have every right to quote him also. In fact it's interesting is it not, that the valid opinions of one of the world's foremost experts on the subject are NOT to be found on the usual pop-science sources... why would that be do you think? - as Raup said, much of what has crept into evolutionary literature is pure fiction.
![[TH] 2024 PMGC League | Survival Stage วันที่ 1 | PUBG MOBILE Global Championship](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FVFT-PFwU80/mqdefault.jpg)
Good luck tomorrow guys
I hope this works out 😭😭😭😭
❤goodluck
Writing tomorrow, I’m cooked
@@mariogamingparadise7600nah we ain't
@@mariogamingparadise7600 i feel you
@@liza-marie7331 I actually cooked that paper🏋️♀️🐶
Who's watching it in 2024
I am
Same here 😁
Me
Me
Me
I got 86% in my June Exam, grade 12 all thanks to the goat Miss Angler. Thank you so much for existing coz you explain way better than my current LS teacher and he always says that you tube teachers are not good for us, and you madam have proved him wrong🔥🔥🔥
As a PhD student in Wireless Communications who wants to understand the background behind Evolutionary Computation and Multiobjective Optimization with Genetic Algorithms (topics primarily inspired by life science(s)), I find this material excellent, simple, and straightforward. It is designed not only for preparing for examinations but also for enriching the curiosity of knowledge seekers, even those outside this field. If I were to put Miss Angler's material into words, I'd say it's the "Art of Simplicity"...
Who is watching in preparation of prelims?
Meeee
Me😢
😢
😊
Me 😢
Miss Angler we appreciate your informative lessons,they really help,I'll be rewriting in June,and I've found these videos very helpful,I understand the chapter a lot better now.🙏🙏
Thank you so much! That’s the goal!!
Same I got level 2 last time but Im rewriting in June and I could already tell that I will get a lot more than level 2. These videos are so helpful especially for us who cant afford extra/private lessons.
@@PIANOSHOWCASE Will uni still accept you if you rewrite June because I am kind of on my last legs 😢
I'm writing tomorrow and I haven't started this topic yet😢
I am going to write paper 2 on Monday .paper 1 I wrote it yesterday it was a walk-in park .thank you 🎉
Can I get your details so we can know one another
Hi mam IAM so happy to find you IAM writing in June maths literacy & life sciences.iwill push for 70 + to both subjects with you help.❤️
the best life science teacher!!!!
I CANT END IT IN A LOSS 🗣🔥🔥🔥
I hate life science 😔
goodluck,we'll both need it 😅
Same applies bro. Smh
@@ntokozomfundo8051 I know fokol bra 😭😭my school doesn't offer enough subjects.... I would do anything other than life science 😭😭Goodluck tho Bru 🥴
@@itumelengmokoena3316 struggle is real 🤕
I chose life science by accident thinking it was life orientation and now I'm suffering 😍😍
Life science is the pain of my existence 😭
U make it so more easier to study ❤
Thanks Mrs Angler u are helping us too much ❤️❤️❤️
Whose watching because you don't wanna read
Me
Anyone in 2024 preparing for prelims 😂❤
I don't even take biology but these videos are so interesting
That's crazy
Hi Miss Angler. Are there any notes on Evolution? Thank you for all the effort you out into your videos and notes.
Not yet! But a note will be available by early next term!
Tomorrow I'm writing paper 2
We are tired 😔
We need a serious study for this chapter 😢
It's going down tomz😢
We got this dawg🙏🏼💯I'm starting evolution tonight
This was very helpful . Thank you!
Thank you ❤.
Writing Life science trial paper 2 tomorrow
Same😭
@@nthabelengtiti 😭😭
Yoh same😭and the fact that evolution counts the most💀
Miss Angler may you please make a separate playlist for specifically grade 12 content like you did with the grade 11
I have! Just check my homepage on my TH-cam it’s there
Thank you so much Ma'am
Baie dankie miss Angler Ek lief vir jou ❤❤❤
Thank you maam...it's really helpful
I should’ve picked Geo😭😭
i do both 😢
Thank you so much ma’am ❤️ I appreciate you ma’am ❤️
Miss Angler do you have a video that talks about the groups in evolution like Astraupitecus Africanas?
Not yet but I will be adding them
@@missanglerI'll be waiting because thats the next topic I will be studying. Thanks for the vids btw🙏🏿
😮I have no words so far
Here is what I see has happened to many who have been seduced by Darwinism. You were taught certain fundamental truths as a youth. You were instructed in the sciences, in mathematics, physics, geography, history and biology by teachers whom you respected as a youth, whom you admired and looked up to. And because as an impressionable youth you admired, respected and looked up to these people, and much of what they taught you was true, when they introduced the Darwinian theory of evolution to you, sort of slipping it in with algebra, chemistry, biology and astronomy - the classical sciences, then you accepted it also without reservation, you didn't question it, you swallowed it whole since these people were your mentors and you trusted them, almost revered them. Usually it was introduced to you in science class with some Disney like animation showing lightening striking an ancient pond, then cells emerging, then fish swimming in a sea before they crawled out onto land and lost their scales and became amphibians that became reptiles that became birds and mammals that became monkeys that became humans. It was all very skillfully done, and there was usually very little actual science involved; you were told a story, much like a Sunday school Noah's Ark story, only this story left out God of course, and because it was in science class it must have been true. It never occured to you that your teachers who told you that evolution was a fact as real as the Laws of Gravity might have themselves been deceived in their youth when they were in science class, and then they introduced that very same deception into your life, all with the very best of intentions. So you accepted evolution as being as legitimate as all of the other sciences, your teachers certainly wouldn't lie to you, and then over the course of time it became your Weltanschauung. As time progressed and you grew older, a sort of intellectual pride clouded your worldview, and also affected, or more precisely infected your understanding of earth's history, of man's origin; and you became too sophisticated to believe in the straight, literal truth of Genesis. In your youthful hubris you substituted Darwin for Moses. Over the course of time Darwinism became more entrenched in your mind. It became a dogma; it was your world view through which you interpreted reality. Part of this springs from Hellenism, the Greek philosophy that is the cornerstone of much of modern thought.
Shout out to those who are writing the next day 😂✌️
I'm writing in 2 hours
chat its 12 and im only starting evolution now am i cooked?
We are cooked my man🥲
very much cooked,the topic is long hey😞
Eye colour is continous variation?
Yup it is but in school we make it sounds like discontinuous
I'd love to join your group too
I LOVE YOUR VIDEOS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Can't concentrate on the video😪
Much has been said by historians of Darwin's observations of the finches on the Galapagos islands while sailing on the Beagle, but little is mentioned of another incident Darwin had with some less fortunate birds on a different island during his voyage. We have three accounts of an excursion made by Darwin and the Captain from the Beagle to St. Paul's Rocks between the Cape Verde Islands and the coast of Brazil.
First we shall read Darwin's version of the episode: " We found on St. Paul's only two kinds of birds-the booby and the noddy. The former is a species of Gannet, and the latter a tern. Both are of a tame and stupid disposition, and are so unaccustomed to visitors, that I could have killed any number of them with my geologic hammer." The Voyage of Charles Darwin, Charles Darwin, pp.10, The American Museum of Natural History, The Natural History Library, Anchor Books, Doubleday & Co., Inc., Garden City New York, 1962.
Browne mentioned the appalling incident in her biography of Darwin: " Uninhabited except for dense flocks of seafowl, and previously unvisited by any scientific recorder, they were an alluring target for a restless naval man and an eager friend . . . Darwin and Fitzroy had a marvelous time of it, whooping and killing birds with abandon". Browne, pp.204. See also the original, Narrative of the Surveying Voyage of H.M.S. Adventure and Beagle, Vol. 2:56.
Fitzroy recorded the bloody scene in his personal narrative as well. According to him, one of the seamen asked if he could borrow Darwin's hammer to kill some of the birds with, to which Darwin replied, "No, no, you'll break the handle." Then, apparently struck by the novelty of this idea, Darwin himself picked up his hammer and began killing the peaceful birds in this manner, as Fitzroy related "away went the hammer, with all the force of his own right arm." Narrative of the Voyages of the Adventure and Beagle, by Admiral Fitzroy, 1839. See also Amabel Williams Ellis, "The Voyage of the Beagle, Adapted from the Narratives and letters of Charles Darwin and Captain Fitzroy, pp. 26, J.B. Lippencott Co., Philadelphia and London, 1931.
Hi Miss Angler, are the notes available yet?
These are really helpful. Thank you.
Every single biological fact in the world refutes evolution crackpot theory.
Almost 200 years of this malarkey and still not one single shred of evidence of this nonsensical species morphing theory.
you're in no position to criticize evidence seeing as there's none for your religious superstitions
@@AMC2283What religious? Your idiotic theory doesn’t exist anywhere in science or biology.
me too im still watching
Add a comment…
when they became extinct did they kill them or something happened to them
They just died because they couldn't survive to that type of environment .
Is this accent South African ?
Yeah, it’s one of South Africa’s accents. Each ethnicity tends to have a different accent but this also varies because of area.
The phylogenetic tree is actually a myth. It is an artifact of evolutionist imagination. The branches are drawn in to represent what is supposedly millions of years of transitional links, but in reality all that we have are the roots and the top rungs of the tree. The millions of years of transitional links that the branches are supposed to represent don't actually exist in the fossil record, they have never been found.
Can you give an example of what's missing?
@@wooe David Raup, paleontologist and curator of the Chicago Field Museum: 'ironically we have even fewer examples of transitional [fossils] than we did in Darwin's day'
(Because most have been debunked - as adolescents, deformation or simply different animals with no ancestral connection.)
@@SteveLomas-k6k When you Google that quote you'll get a long list of conspiracy sites like Answers in Genesis and similar. Your second claim also match what they tend to lie about.
Just a tip: If you want to read about biology, read stuff from professionals in the related fields. Theists isn't included in that group.
I don't know about you but when I need to check my teeth I visit the dentist and not the plumber. You should apply the same thing when it comes to this topic.
@@wooe? David Raup was one of the most qualified paleontologists on the planet. Not a pop-science TV/book celeb like Dawkins, Nye or Degrasse-Tyson!
Raup was dean of paleontology at the university of Chicago, before becoming curator of the Chicago Field Museum, one of the most esteemed natural history museums in the world (of Sue the dinosaur fame) I used to live nearby and visited many times.
This was one of many similar quotes from a paper he wrote titled 'conflicts between Darwin and Paleontology'- I've no idea if it's on 'answers in Genesis' but they have every right to quote him also. In fact it's quite telling isn't it, that the valid opinions of one of the world's most foremost paleontologists are NOT to be found on more well known pop-science sites.
As Raup said, much of what has crept into evolutionary literature is pure fiction.
@@wooe? David Raup was one of the most qualified paleontologists on the planet. Not a pop-science TV/book celeb like Dawkins, Nye, Degrasse-Tyson!
Raup was dean of paleontology at the university of Chicago, before curator of the Chicago Field Museum, one of the most esteemed natural history museums in the world (of Sue the dinosaur fame) I used to live nearby and visited many times.
This was one of many similar quotes from a paper he wrote titled 'conflicts between Darwin and Paleontology'- I've no idea if it's on 'answers in Genesis' but they have every right to quote him also. In fact it's interesting is it not, that the valid opinions of one of the world's foremost experts on the subject are NOT to be found on the usual pop-science sources...
why would that be do you think?
- as Raup said, much of what has crept into evolutionary literature is pure fiction.
Writing today and I feel like I know nothing😭😭😭
How'd it go
@@kierakemp6114 it was good, thanks for asking ❤
I hate evolution 😢
No, it's awesome.
Damn 😢