What is the significance of this chapter and the two additional time prophecies (the 1290 & 1335)? Timings for topics covered in this lesson: - 2:01 What happens at the end of time - 6:19 Why is Daniel told to seal up the words? - 8:13 What does it mean that knowledge will increase in Daniel 12? - 12:09 How long until the end of the wonders? What is the abomination of desolation? - 31:01 How all the time prophecies of Daniel are related For more on Daniel chapter 12 and to get the resources, visit: www.angelsintheglen.org/daniel12
Sadly, I understood 10 minutes in this was one of those RCC/Beast/False Prophet teachings, which is in error. For starters, the 2300 Evening and Mornings are by definition 1150 days. The 1260 that is spoken of happens in the middle of the 70th week. That is when the Anti-Christ Conquers Jerusalem, the very scripture tells us that, from the time the holy peoples are scattered there will be 1260 days until these wonders end {Second Coming ends what Daniel was seeing}. Then the 1290 happens BEFORE the 1260 in that it is the False Prophet {Jewish High Priest} TAKING AWAY the Sacrifice {Jesus Worship by the Jews who repent BEFORE the DOTL like Malachi 4:5-6 says}. So, in verse 8 Daniel asks the EXACT SAME QUESTION as the Anel asked Jesus earlier, How long until these wonders end. So the 1290 is 1290 days from the Second Coming or 30 days before the Anti-Christ Conquers Jerusalem. This is the 30 days the Jews need in order to Flee Judea unto the Petra/Bozrah area. The 1335 comes before both the 1290 and 1260 therefore it is 1335 days BEFORE the Second Coming ends all these wonders....Psssttt, everything is REVERSED. The Two-witnesses are that Blessing, Elijah shows up BEFORE the DOTL just like Malachi 4:5-6 says. Thus the Jews have repented by the time the 1290 AoD arrives and thus know to Flee..............before the Beast Conquers Jerusalem.
@@MrRondonmon Thanks for your comment. There’s a lot to cover. Not sure we’ll be able to address all your points and implied points, however, our divergent views have their origins in how a “day” in Bible prophecy is interpreted. We believe a “day” is translated as a literal year for all the time prophecies in Daniel and Revelation. We believe this is a consistent and an accurate interpretation as supported by many scriptures throughout the Bible. Please see Ezekiel 4; Number 14; and Genesis 29 as examples. Ezekiel 4:4-6 (NASB) 4 "As for you, lie down on your left side and lay the iniquity of the house of Israel on it; you shall bear their iniquity for the number of days that you lie on it. 5 "For I have assigned you a number of days corresponding to the years of their iniquity, three hundred and ninety days; thus you shall bear the iniquity of the house of Israel. 6 "When you have completed these, you shall lie down a second time, but on your right side and bear the iniquity of the house of Judah; I have assigned it to you for forty days, a day for each year. The day-year principle is also found in Numbers 14:34 (forty days to spy the land and forty years of guilt); Genesis 29:20, 27 (a week equals seven years). There are many other Biblical references supporting the day-year principle. As such, all the time prophecies in Daniel (time, times, ½ time, 2300, 70 week, 1290, 1335, and Revelation (42 months, 1260) are all literal years. Based upon what you have written, it seems that the day-year principle is inconsistently applied. For example, it seems you imply that the “70th week” is a total of seven years. If that is correct, then why are the 1260, the 1290, the 1335 all considered literal days or in the case of the 2300 they are considered half days? It is simply not consistent to use literal years and then switch to literal days. As such, we cannot find any Biblical evidence or reasoning to support this interpretation. Also, what is written implies the “gap” theory to the 70th week of Daniel 9. We cannot find any reasoning in the Bible to simply jump thousands of years into the future and insert a “seven year period” without any precedent or marker as to when the 70th week would start (and then insert 1260, 1290, and 1335 time prophecies). This runs counter to a God who wants His people ready for end-time events. God doesn’t want us to be surprised. He wants us ready. We demonstrate how all the time prophecies in Daniel and Revelation are related in our Daniel 7 and 8 videos and they all consistently use the day-year principle. In addition, we do not interpret the prophecies of Daniel and Revelation with a literal temple in literal Jerusalem with a literal Jewish High Priest. Everything after the cross would point to the Heavenly Temple and the Church on earth (which is a part of the Heavenly Jerusalem through the cross of Christ). We will make this very clear in our Revelation 11 and 12 videos (to be posted later in June) That is, the Church, while on earth, is the body of Christ with Christ as the head. For example, Saul (later Paul) would have an encounter with Jesus on the road to Damascus. Jesus appeared to him and asked him why he was persecuting Him (Jesus). How could Saul persecute Jesus after He ascended to heaven? Saul could do this because the church is the body of Christ. If you persecute the body, you persecute Christ. This is why we believe that looking to a literal temple in literal Jerusalem is one of the biggest mistakes happening in the Christian Church today. Many are taking the words of Jesus and mis-applying them literally, when he meant spiritually. There are many examples in the Bible. When Jesus said to destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up, they thought He was talking about the literal temple. We know He was talking about His physical body and resurrection. Nicodemus thought that to be born again he had to somehow enter a second time into his mother’s womb. Jesus would have to explain that it was a spiritual re-birth and correct a teacher of Israel. The women at the well thought that the water Jesus offered her would eliminate any future need to quench her physical thirst. Jesus would be speaking of the Holy Spirit dwelling within us. These stories in John 2, 3, and 4 (and there are plenty more) provide us warning of how the Jews interpreted Jesus words as literal when He was speaking of the spiritual. Thanks for checking us out and watching.
@@AngelsintheGlen It can be but is not always a year. Just like the 7 days of a groom and bride spends in the father's house represents the 7 years the bride spends in Heaven. And just like the 70 weeks total 490 years. But at other times, as you well know, the prophecy is day fir day, and year for year. So we have to go by the context of the scriptures. We know this is the END TIMES, all we have to do is read Daniel 12:1-2 and we can see this is the end time because Daniel is told it's the end time when the righteous are judged and raised up. We are also told Micheal STANDS UP, and we see Micheal STANDS UP in Rev. 12, don't we? So, when Gabriel askes Jesus (Man in Linen) how long until these wonders end, Jesus tells him that it will be 1260 days from the time the holy people are conquered, until these wonders end (Second Coming) and in verses 1 and 2 we are told this is the VERY END when men are Judged !! So, the day means nothing, we know it can go both ways, you have to follow the contextual argument put forth, and that shows that Daniel is being told these are END TIME EVENTS !! Antiochus is THE TYPE, then we see the Anti-Christ in verses 36-45. If we read history and the book of Maccabeans, we can see the TYPE False Prophet in Jason, who bribed Antiochus to become the High Priest, having his Pious brother Onias III killed, he then tried to Hellenize the Jews, leading unto the Maccabean Revolt. Daniel 12 is the END TIMES. The Temple will be rebuilt, Jesus says that which OUGHT NOT STAND in Matt. 25:15, there is nothing g standing in the holy of holies in Heaven, he is speaking about ON EARTH. The 70 years the Jews had to stay in Babylon was 70 actual years. There is all kind of prophecies that go day by day, as you well know, so my point remains a prophetic uttering can go either way, days can be used fr days or literal years. But when the days are actual days, the context fills us in, we know the 70th week is only 7 years, so a Prophetic uttering of 1260 Days within the 70th week can only mean days. As per the 2300, REREAD the chapter with a strong's beside you. The word used for DAY is not ONE WORD, it is TWO WORDS, and further on in the chapter (LOL) it is called Evening and Morning, not Day, the exact same reference is described differently. Now read Daniel 9:21 where he is praying, he says about te time of the EVENING OBLATION !! The Jews had a MORNING offering/oblation/tribute unto God AND and Evening offering/oblation/tribute unto God every day. So, when it says there will be 2300 days, THAT IS NOT what the Hebrew Text actually says, it says there will be, 2300..........Evening and Morning Sacrifices, GO LOOK IT UP, which means 1150 total days because there are 2 sacrifices each day. I will post it here fir you brother. Daniel 8:14 And he said 559 z8799 unto x413 me, Unto x5704 two thousand 505 and three 7969 hundred 3967 *days; 6153 1242* then shall the sanctuary 6944 be cleansed. 6663 z8738 NOTICE the TWO NUMBERS behind days above? WATCH 6153, Ereb = Dusk 1242 , Boqer = Dawn or break of day. Verses 12 and 13 is talking about the Daily Sacrifices being taken away, and then we are told there will be 2300 that are taken away..........Not days, but Evening and Morning Sacrifices. To prove the translators were clueless here, THIS IS FUNNY, the translate the same two words totally different in the SAME CHAPTER. (LOL) And the vision 4758 *of the evening 6153 and the morning 1242* which x834 was told 559 z8738 [is] true: 571 wherefore shut thou up 5640 z8798 x859 the vision; 2377 for x3588 it [shall be] for many 7227 days. 3117 LOL, above they call it the Evening and the Morning, not THE DAY................Because that is what it is. Thus, Gabriel was telling Daniel that Israel would miss 1150 Daily Sacrifices before the Sanctuary was CLEANSED. As per your "THEORY QUIP" God gave us a Prophecy in THREES, He did not give us ONE prophecy, we got three specific prophesies for a reason. a 49-year prophecy, a 434 year prophesy and a 7 year prophesy. God is dealing with Israel's sin, BEFORE this punishment can be abated, Israel has to repent, thus the 70th week can not be finished until Israel repents, Jesus dying does not make a nation repent sir. The Church Age came, Israel were as what ? Dead Men's Bones for 2000 years, so there was o Israel because they refused to repent, thus the 70th week is designed to get Israel to repent. I will tell you a little secret, if Israel had repented 2000 years ago, there would have been no Church Age !! 70 AD would have been when Jesus saved the Jews from the Fourth Beast, but they refused to turn from their wickedness, and God foreknew this and thus they became as Dead Men's Bones unto God, e turned his back on them. God doesn't really care if we can grasp His ways or not, if we seek His face in humility, He will show us his ways. The Beasts all went away because there was NO ISRAEL. The Church delivered a Mortal Wound to the Beast. Once we are raptured, the Anti-Christ Conquers Jerusalem and the MANY in the Mediterranean Sea Region to become the Beast (WOUND is healed) again. The tie of the Gentiles will be over, just like Jacob and Esau, the Elder served the younger, right now the Elder is serving the younger, but soon Israel will have to repent, and then God/Jesus will DWELL (Tabernacle) with her for 1000 years. That is the LAST FEAST (Tabernacle). The 7 Feasts of Leviticus 23 tell us the whole history of the world !! Fall Feasts 1.) Feast of Passover (Jesus fulfilled) 2.) Feast of First-fruits (Jesus was the first-fruits of the grave) 3.) Feast of Unleavened Bread (Jesus was without sin) Summer Harvest 4.) Feast of Weeks/Pentecost/Harvest/Church Age ( We are now harvesting sould for God/Jesus, this is on the calendar all unto itself, the Trumpets or Shofars ALWAYS SOUNDED to end the Harvest !! At the Last Trump the Church Age ends.................And then what happens? LOOK AND SEE) Fall Feasts 5.) Feast of Trumps (This never did much except make announcements, thus the Trumpets Ends the Harvest or Church Age, and in Rev. 4:1 it says Jesus' voice is as the sound of a Trumpet. In other words, it reverberates and only the saved in Christ Jesus can hear it via the Holy Spirit. Then the Trumpet sounds and it signifies that the Feasts of Atonement and Tabernacle are NIGH AT HAND ) 6.) Feast of Atonement (You smell this rat yet? Israel must ATONE before the 70th week can end, the very prophecy tells us that. So, Israel repents/atones, just like Malachi 4:5-6 says and Zechariah 13:8-9 says.) 7.) Feast of Tabernacle (Jesus DWELLS with Israel for 1000 years. The Fall Feasts are then completed. The Papacy is the WRONG ANGLE, as is the Islamic Anti--Christ. He's a Gentile King from Europe, and he has a sidekick who will be a Jewish High Priest. Sorry I took so long, overlooked this
Thanks for the feedback. God bless you. Please watch our entire series beginning in Daniel 1. We have a complete series on the prophecies in Daniel and Revelation.
Thanks for your question. The answer to your question is found in this video: th-cam.com/video/FeS9Gta-6nw/w-d-xo.html Also, Jesus is the Eternal God. He has always existed with God the Father. In the link above, we demonstrate from the Bible that another name for Jesus is Michael as well as how Jesus appeared in the OT. We cover this topic with many scriptures in both the OT and NT and much more. Thanks for you question and watching our videos!
@@kurtcunningham9899 Michael rebukes satan saying "The Lord rebukes you" he didn't say the Lord "will" rebuke you because his WORD is that rebuke my friend. Michael is asleep and preparing to arise as we speak
@@briananderson1246 incorrect! If youll read just prior to what you just wrote it says michael dared not make an accusation. You really think there is anything Jesus would dare not do?
Wait. What? Satan is the accuser. Why would Christ need to accuse anyone? He is the judge. He doesn’t make accusations, He passes judgement. That said, the various English translations can cause some confusion. The ESV translates Daniel 10:13 as “...Michael, one of the Chief princes...” That translation certainly eliminates Christ as a possibility because Christ is not ONE OF the chief princes (plural). He is above and beyond all other princes. The scriptures do say that when Christ returns, He will sound with the VOICE OF archangel. Scripture is clear that God spoke THROUGH his prophets (Heb. 1:1). Daniel is identified as a prophet, but he never claimed to be God, likewise with king David. So another possibility is that when Christ returns, He will announce through His archangel, Michael. I think the important thing is to study it with a humble, open mind and be careful not to decide our doctrine based on our preconceived notions. Clearly, this is a subject that requires us to give it more, detailed study. The most important thing of all is that Christ is not diminished in our lives. Regardless of who, exactly, Michael is, God has made our savior clear to us. Michael is an angelic form, whether a manifestation of Christ or not, that fact seems subordinate to the fact that we are mankind. Therefore, OUR Savior is the Son of Man (known to us as Jesus of Nazareth). As long as we remember that the main thing is to keep the Main Thing as the main thing, the other topics are doctrinal “trivia” for lack of a better term. As long as Christ is not made subordinate to anything in our view and our lives, we are safe to study out these ideas.
Hosea 2:20 in the amplified Bible says and you shall cherish the Lord. You shall appreciate the Lord. You shall recognize the Lord. You shall give heed to the Lord. You shall be acquainted with the Lord. It goes right along with James 4:5 in the amplified Bible it says The Spirit Whom He has caused to dwell in us yearns over us and He yearns for the Spirit to be welcome with a jealous love. HOW BEAUTIFUL HALLELUJAH
Please watch the video in the below link and read the comments we've provided in that video. Jesus has always been an eternal being and one with the God the Father. He has existed for all eternity. In the video, we point out the scriptures that sometimes He took the form of an angel. Taking the form of an angel and being a created angel are two different things. The video will explain that. Thanks. th-cam.com/video/FeS9Gta-6nw/w-d-xo.html
@@kurtcunningham9899 where does he show he's reading from a Jehovah's witness bible? He admits that Yeshua aka Jesus is God in the flesh and Jehovah's witnesses do not profess this Truth
Solid reading!, Daniel 12:4 has a fairly straightforward reading, but you have gotta remember, the prophecies are always going to unwind themselves, so there's no room for men to interpret, but what Daniel was prophesying to, you alluded to, he actually prophesied to what we're living today... "And knowledge will increase" that word increase in Hebrew, depending upon your translation, is "explosion" Daniel was prophesying about the industrial revolution which had not happened yet... but in a short-season past the liberation of Christians from the tyranny and oppression of Rome, in 1798, the industrial revolution was less than fifty years later. During the days of the pre-industrial era, man was [by-in-large] traveling by horse-drawn buggy - in less than fifty years later, we were driving, less than 50 years from that time we were flying... an "explosion" indeed. The industrial revolution would turn the world upside down, it was such a blessing because an average man could have an idea and make wealth beyond what monarchies possessed - now we can see where satan's den of influence was getting rocked, and the push towards government centralization came out of that period. Great study!
Watched some of this. Haven’t heart of 380 AD. Thought 313 was when Christianity was accepted with the Edit of Milan? Rest makes sense. You make it easy to understand; very nice. Curious, clothes, tee shirts, sneakers, etc have their names on them…example Nike or Reebok, etc…or even a picture on clothes…is that an idol?
They are only idols if one's heart is so attached and attracted to them. For example, does the person find their identity and value as a person associated with a specific brand name or icon? That is, do they need to wear them as a display to others for identity? or does the person simply wear them because the clothes fit or are of high quality. It all depends on the heart of the individual.
@@AngelsintheGlen for years received church anger where they say no mix or synthetic fibers; think an EW thing. But I wear practical, durable, plain things, many polyester, synthetic, some plastic boots to stay dry in so much rain in Seattle type weather. Comfort and practical things to last to the end w/o getting tire of them no matter how worn they are, but churches seem to keep one’s focus on so much things like being lost if women wear pants, etc. (per EW they say).
What do you think about Uriah Smith’s assertion that “the daily” is a mistranslation and actually just means the continuous, actually referring to Pagan Rome, not to the sacrificial system?
We provide a Biblical explanation and definition of what "the daily" is in our Daniel 8 and 9 videos. Please critically evaluate it and judge for yourself.
Very interesting, some previous comments raised questions, akso key words "end", so a lot of previous centuries should have little weight, nevertheless grateful for discussing it.
In the Hebrew when Michael stands up it means he ceases or stops what happens after he ceases or stops all hell breaks loose. So could it mean he stops restraining
Great teaching! A few years ago I discovered that virtually all churches in the USA are state churches by virtue of IRS codes. There are still a few “Free” churches that are not 501C3 tax exempt to avoid being owned by the state. A great book on the subject is “In Caesar’s Grip”. “501c3 churches are prohibited from addressing, in any tangible way, the vital issues of the day.” “For a 501c3 church to openly speak out, or organize in opposition to, anything that the government declares "legal," even if it is immoral (e.g. abortion, homosexuality, etc.), that church will jeopardize its tax exempt status. The 501c3 has had a "chilling effect" upon the free speech rights of the church. LBJ was a shrewd and cunning politician who seemed to well-appreciate how easily many of the clergy would sell out.” “Did the church ever need to seek permission from the government to be exempt from taxes? Were churches prior to 1954 taxable? No, churches have never been taxable. To be taxable a church would first need to be under the jurisdiction, and therefore under the taxing authority, of the government. The First Amendment clearly places the church outside the jurisdiction of the civil government: "Congress shall make NO LAW respecting an establishment of religion, nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof." hushmoney.org/501c3-facts.htm
1) This is totally irrelevant to the discussion (or most anything else, really). 2) There are MANY, MANY Christian churches in the USA that openly speak out against political policies and societal norms. In fact, one of the largest churches in the USA (which I do not attend nor am I a member of), Lakewood Church in Houston, TX that is pastored by Joel Osteen openly said on TV that homosexuality is a sin. That is in direct opposition to American societal norms and its taboo to say it. I, myself, have had 2 comments (in other videos) deleted off TH-cam for saying that. So there are still Christian churches that speak out and preach the Word.
We believe the answer is given from about minute :30 to minute :42 in this video. "the daily" was first defined and identified back in Daniel 8 and 9 videos. See Daniel 9 part 4 specifically for a review of "the daily". What Clovis does is accept and embrace the church-state system which is the means by which the "the daily" - the law of God (which is the gospel, which is the eternal covenant, which is the word of God, which is Christ Himself) - is removed. This abomination would go on for a time, times, and a half of time during the church-state system of the middle ages.
Yes, but let us briefly explain what's going on. First, Jesus is God. He has always been God and will always be one with the God the Father and the Holy Spirit. Jesus is eternal, all powerful, all knowing, ever present with His church, holy, self-existent, and unchangeable. However, as you know, in the fullness of time, Jesus, the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity and become the God-man Jesus Christ at the incarnation. What we explain from the scriptures is that BEFORE the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity, He first placed Himself in angel form and was the protector of ancient Israel as the Angel of the LORD. The Angel of the LORD who protected Israel is Michael the Archangel. Christ was in the OT as the God-angel, i.e., the Angel of the LORD, and He was the God-man in the NT, Jesus Christ. If we critically examine the scriptures, this will become readily apparent. Please understand that we are not the first to point this out. Many of the great Protestant Reformers also came to this conclusion. This includes Martin Luther, the father of the Reformation. Luther's associate Philip Melanchthon. The second father of the Reformation, John Calvin. The Baptist preacher Charles Spurgeon. Even John Wesley, the greatest preacher since the Apostle Paul came to this same conclusion. We can name many other great theologians and scholars, however, our purpose in putting this series together is that we've lost deep Bible study in our Churches and we need to reinvigorate the study of the scriptures like the Bereans, closely examining and testing the scriptures to see if they are true. We're still working on the Michael series but please critically evaluate all the scriptures we provide which demonstrate this truth.
Did anything significant happen in the year 1844 AD, when the time period that Daniel talks about came to an end? For example was there a huge earthquake or some political event that took place in 1844, to usher in the final end time period? (At the end of the Chazown period).
Yes. Two major events happened at the end of the 2300 evenings and mornings time prophecy. One was in heaven (see our Daniel 9 part 4 and part 5 videos) and the other on earth (see our Revelation 10 video). However, to fully appreciate the answer, we recommend watching our entire Daniel series. Pay special attention to our Daniel 8 videos because they provide critical information to understand Daniel 9, 10, 11, 12, and Revelation 10.
If I may put in my 2 cents, I believe that the answer is yes. Isaiah seems to envision a messianic Jubilee which ends in the establishment of the nation. Jeremiah prophesied of the 70 Jubilee which were missed by Judah, and that is the basis for Daniel's 70 week prophecy. The ultimate "jubilee" would come at the end of the 1260 days when Christ returns from heaven. I think when all three of these prophecies are considered in light of the 11Q melchizidek scroll, and Jesus' time of visitation statement I would say that yes Danuel is basing his prophecy on Isaiahs prophecy is 11 and 61. God bless you
To be clear, Jesus is God. He is an eternal being. He is the beginning and the end. Michael just happens to be another name for Jesus. We explain this in more detail in our video. www.angelsintheglen.org/michael However, , we recognize this is a teaching is not well received in the Christian Church. If you read the comments on the above video in youtube, you will see some very strong negative reactions to our teaching. However, please read our responses. Even at that we recognize many will not be convinced. However, we are undisturbed in our mission to preach and teach exactly what the Bible tells us. Thanks for watching our video and your comment.
@@janetfunmilola7736 ............angel in the Greek menas messenger - jesus was not an angel but he was God's chief messenger...he is God....he is also immanuel
You have to read carefully Daniel 10:12-17. In verse 13, Daniel mentioned Michael came. At that time, he was alone there. Daniel always used to bow down when he sees angel. Definitely, this time also. He did not recognize who He really was. Then, in verse 16, one who came, TOUCHED him. Then Daniel realized, "ONE HAVING LIKENESS OF THE SON OF MAN" stood before him and touched his lips. * Michael is the Son of man. WHO IS SON OF MAN, OTHER THAN JESUS?
Daniel 12:1-4 is talking about great white throne judgement. Daniel 12:5-13 is talking about the last half of the tribulation. I discern Daniel 12:11-12 in rapture explained video at The Lords Day Ministry channel.
Daniel 12:1-4 is talking about the final tribulation that will occur on the earth which will include the church. Daniel 12:5-13 has already occurred. It is in the past and has been fulfilled. In fact, all the time prophecies of Daniel and Revelation have been fulfilled. We explain all of them in our series. We recommend watching our entire series beginning in Daniel 1 to under stand Daniel 12. For example, the entire theme of Daniel is found in Daniel 1:1-2. Those two verses provide the framework for the entire book and are critical to understand the last verses of Daniel 12. If one doesn't recognize the theme in Daniel 1:1-2, they will not be able to discern the meaning of the latter part of the book, nor key parts of Revelation. You can contact us directly through our website if you have any questions.
@@AngelsintheGlen Daniel 12:2 says," And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt." This is the second resurrection. Revelation 20:6 tells us those in the first resurrection have no second death. So, since some that are resurrected in Daniel 12:2 have shame and everlasting contempt they have to be part of the second resurrection that happens before the great white throne judgement. There are only 2 resurrections. And you are just flat out wrong about Daniel 12:5-13. It's talking about the tribulation to come. The little horn in Daniel 7:8 is the anti christ. Daniel 11:36 is talking about the abomination desolation by the anti christ. He shall prosper until the second coming.
@@thelordsdayministry2026 We'll just have to agree to disagree. Please critically evaluate our teachings. Examine and test everything we have to say on this subject. We have provided detailed videos to explain our conclusions. We welcome critical feedback based on our logic and reasoning using the Bible (and history where it applies). You can reach out to us directly on our website with any questions.
@@AngelsintheGlen Explain to me where it says anything about a resurrection in the tribulation where people are resurrected to everlasting contempt. You can't. Everything I said is backed up by Scripture.
Nooooo!! I have been watching all your teachings of Daniel until today. Yeshua is NOT the Archangel Michael. I wanted to watch the blue stone as well as revelation - but this is a deal breaker for me. Why does the Bible refer to "The angel of the Lord?" and not just call him Michael. The Angel of the Lord is Jesus/Yeshua not Michael. Jesus is not "one of" the chief princes. He is God. Just my opinion.
Please watch the blue stone study. We promise you, you will not be disappointed. Please watch all three parts of the blue stone and lets us know your thoughts. Contact us via our website if you'd like. Also, we'll be creating a more detailed video on Michael to make this very clear. We're not trying to push this point on Michael, but the Biblical evidences are clear. We stand by our teaching and will make it even clearer in a new video. We'll have many more scriptures and a detailed explanation that will make this teaching easier to digest and understand. Please stick with us in our series. Thanks
Let’s trust the Holy Spirit to guide us and expose error. Therefore, let us be courageous in our study. There’s nothing wrong with asking questions and challenging our beliefs. Is Michael the angelic manifestation of Christ? I’m not sure, but I know that NOTHING can separate me from His love and salvation, so let us ask and study. If the idea is wrong, then discard it. If not, adopt it. Let’s wait until we’ve seen all the evidence he presents, then judge it. “The spiritual person judges all things, but is himself to be judged by no one. “For who has understood the mind of the Lord so as to instruct him?” But we have the mind of Christ.” 1 Corinthians 2:15-16 ESV
You made an error sir. Jesus is not Michael nor was he ever refer to as Michael in the Bible. The Scripture or specific verse was talking about Michael the Archangel. I see a lot of doctrinal errors in your teachings.
Please watch this video to provide ample evidence that Michael is another name for Christ. th-cam.com/video/FeS9Gta-6nw/w-d-xo.html. Also, we'll be providing another more detailed video and go even deeper this this one. It will be coming out soon. Thanks. Please continue to stick with us throughout our entire series to understand exactly what must take place before Christ returns.
Is Jesus Emmanuel or not? Don’t get confused because of a symbolic name given for Christ. An angel also means messenger. 1 Thessalonians 4:16 For the 👉Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout👈, 👉with the voice of the archangel👈, and with the trump of God: and the 👉dead in Christ shall rise first👈 John 5:26-28 26 For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself; 27 And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because 👉he is the Son of man👈. 28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which 👉all that are in the graves👈 shall 👉hear his voice👈 Thessalonians says who will shout and the people in the graves will rise. John says the Son of man is the one that will be coming and those in the graves will hear his voice.
Do you think that the setting up of Sunday worship and it enforcement being also an idol, which is a false Sabbath, can this also lead to the abomination of desolation ?
That is right I was waiting on you to say that at the end times many will go back and forth over the book and knowledge will increase now I want you to see something if Christianity is here at the end times still standing and the most high wake up the tribe of Judah this is where the back and forth of book will be dispute and in that dispute the chapters and verses will give knowledge and who is appointed to teach the book at the end times I will wake up the tribe of Judah and Judah which is the other nations and Judah will be the light the light is the truth. Prophecies it's rebuilding itself shalom and yes I am from the tribal this is the Great Awakening
Is a Prince not next in line for the throne? He's seated and gathering insight to fight with the WORD of his mouth. I AM confident he will realise fully WHO he is SOON and we will behold him and his glory.
First, let us be clear. Jesus is God. Jesus is an eternal being. Jesus is from everlasting to everlasting. He is the alpha and omega. He has no beginning and no end. Jesus has been and will always be God. Michael is simply another name for Christ. For example, in Jude 9 we see Michael the archangel. Archangel means “chief angel” or “first angel” (“angel” means messenger). Michael is the chief ruler of the angels. In other words, Christ is the chief ruler of the angels because Christ created them. When reading Daniel 10:13, Michael, who is the archangel in Jude 9, is the one, chief, prince. He is the number one. In the link below we explain that Michael is simply another name for Christ. The name Michael means “who like/as God”. That is, Michael’s name is in the form of a question: Who is like God? The answer: No one. There is no one like God except God the Father, Jesus Christ the Son, and the Holy Spirit. In the link below we go into more scriptures regarding this topic and how the pre-incarnate Christ was with His people in Israel as the angel of the Lord. Take Exodus 23:20-22 for example.
Exodus 23:20-22 (NASB) 20 "Behold, I am going to send an angel before you to guard you along the way and to bring you into the place which I have prepared. 21 "Be on your guard before him and obey his voice; do not be rebellious toward him, for he will not pardon your transgression, since My name is in him. 22 "But if you truly obey his voice and do all that I say, then I will be an enemy to your enemies and an adversary to your adversaries. Notice in this verse that this particular angel must be obeyed and has the prerogative of pardoning transgression. No created angel has that level of authority or power. Only God. In this case, this is the pre-incarnate Christ Himself in angel form. Notice in that same passage that God says that “My name is in him”. Look at what Christ says in John 17:11-12 about His name. John 17:11-12 (NASB) 11 "I am no longer in the world; and yet they themselves are in the world, and I come to You. Holy Father, keep them in Your name, the name which You have given Me, that they may be one even as We are. 12 "While I was with them, I was keeping them in Your name which You have given Me; and I guarded them and not one of them perished but the son of perdition, so that the Scripture would be fulfilled. www.angelsintheglen.org/michael
Thank you for your comment! We are working on a video to point that out. We recognize that many in the Christian Church do not know what the great reformers believed and taught. We will bring more attention to that in our upcoming video. Thank you!!
This teacher is telling me these days are actually years. Day is "Yom" in Hebrew. Jews consider Yom from sunset to sunset. 1 LITERAL DAY. AND... Jude 1:9. If Michael is Jesus, Michael would have said, "I rebuke you" - common sense and understanding key Hebrew words and phrases goes a long way. OY VEY!
There is a time and event missing here. In Hebrews 1:3 Jesus sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on HIgh, but that was after His ascension into heaven where He ministered to humanity in the holy place, not the most holy place of the heavenly sanctuary. It was in 1844 that first His Father and then Jesus as our high priest rose up from that throne and entered into the Most Holy Place of the second apartment. Where does it say in Bible prophecy that Jesus sat down upon the throne of God there? Isn't He standing there before His Father at the mercy seat, ministering the blood of His righteousness on our behalf and for the blotting out of sins in judgment of the saints? This prophetic imagery is found in Daniel 7:9, 10, 13, 14. Another problem begins here is the explanation of Daniel 12:7. The explanation is perfectly fine for historic adventism, but historic adventism never came to a complete conclusion or understanding of these prophetic times and events. Back during the time of the rising of the little horn power of Daniel 7, this 1260 "time, times, and a dividing of time" was a day for year prophecy. However, in Daniel 12, we have come to the literal end days of the "time of the end". The context of Daniel 12 is to finish the "time of the end". This vision is not about the "time of the past", but the "time of the end"; the future or eschatological days before the return of Christ. 1798, 1843, and 1844 did not fulfill the time of the end. The end of the Chadzown time period merely commenced the beginning of the time of the end which was to climax in events during the last 1335, 1290, and 1260 days approaching the day of Christ's return. On another note: This historical on Arius is not validated in history except by the church fathers of the council of Nice age. There is no original accounts or documentation of Arius except from Catholic apologists of the time that Arius lived. We need to be careful about speculative history, especially when it comes from the great church system of blasphemy and abominations. The history of the formation of the trinity doctrine went along with all the other Roman Catholic code which if you did not follow, you were excommunicated and/or persecuted. So, if you did not believe in the Catholic trinity, which became known as the greatest Roman Catholic doctrine, you would be chastised, excommunicated, persecuted, and/or put in prison or put to death, if you did not recant. Does that give you confidence in the truth of the Roman Catholic Trinity?
Let’s address Jesus’ sitting or standing position. First, as you mentioned, there are many scriptures that indicate that Christ sat down after His ascension (Luke 20:42-43, Eph 1:20, Eph 2:6 (seated us with Him), Col 3:1, Heb 1:3, Heb 1:13, Heb 10:12-13, Heb 12:2). Here are some thoughts. First, Christ won the victory over sin and death by His own blood. As such, He was rightly seated at the right hand of God the Father, not to rest, but to begin His ministry as our great mediator and intercessor. His seated position recognizes His power and authority. This was not true of the earthly priests and high priest who took the blood of animals into the earthly tabernacle. They were daily and yearly working, however not in a seated position, because it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins. However, Christ’s blood indeed has the power to forgive sins and He is our High Priest according to the power of an indestructible life. Second, His seated position is further emphasized in Psalms 110:1 until His enemies are made a footstool for His feet. Psalms 110:1 (the reference in Luke 20:42-43, Heb 1:13 and 10:12-13) (NASB) The LORD says to my Lord: "Sit at My right hand Until I make Your enemies a footstool for Your feet." That time is still in the future, and we don’t see any evidence of Christ’s seated position changing in Daniel 7:9, 10, 13, and 14. For example, in verses 9 and 10, the Ancient of Days takes His seat, as well as the court took their seats. As such, we see no indication that Christ would be in an otherwise sitting position given His authority and power at the right hand of God the Father. However, what about verse 13? Let’s examine both the NASB and KJV. Daniel 7:13 (KJV) I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. Daniel 7:13 (NASB) "I kept looking in the night visions, And behold, with the clouds of heaven One like a Son of Man was coming, And He came up to the Ancient of Days And was presented before Him. Neither version (or any other translation for that matter) indicate a standing position. Rather, He is coming with the clouds of heaven and “they” brought him near, or He was “presented” before God the Father. As such, we don’t see any evidence of “standing” or “rising” from His seated position. Bringing Christ near and presenting Him before the Ancient of Days leans more in the direction of Christ being carried. However, there is one verse that indicates that Christ stood in the heavenly after His ascension. It was at the stoning of Stephen in Acts 7:56. Acts 7:56 (NASB) 56 and he said, "Behold, I see the heavens opened up and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God." This is a unique instance because this event marks the end of the seventy weeks time prophecy and judgment for Israel. As such, Jesus is seen standing by Stephen supporting His faithful servant at the time of his death. Last thought. There are artists who render a standing Jesus before the ark of the covenant in the heavenly temple. While that makes for an interesting picture, we do not see that imagery in scripture. Regarding the 1260, 1290, and 1335. We believe that those time prophecies were fulfilled in 1798 (for the 1260 and 1290) and 1843 (for the 1335). We believe that the “time of the end” began in 1798 and will continue until Christ’s return. Thanks again for your comments.
Thanks for your comments as well. It makes some reasonable sense to consider Jesus "seated at the throne" in the figurative sense of the expression to mean that He shares authority with His Father. However, to say "we see no indication that Christ would be in an otherwise sitting position given His authority and power at the right hand of God the Father" is an assumption that the texts do not provide in the eschatological portions of scripture. Daniel 7:13, 14 and Revelation 5:6, 7 do not indicate that He was sitting on the throne. Yet, He will sit on the throne at the appointed time. To confirm this rendering of scripture, I would quote Early Writings p. 55. "I saw the Father rise from the throne, and in a flaming chariot go into the holy of holies within the veil and sit down. Then Jesus rose up from the throne, and the most of those who were bowed down arose with Him...Then a cloudy chariot, with wheels like flaming fire, surrounded by angels, came to where Jesus was. He stepped into the chariot and was borne to the holiest, where the Father sat. There I beheld Jesus, a great High Priest, standing before the Father. On the hem of His garment was a bell and a pomegranate, a bell and a pomegranate..." Concerning Daniel 12, why would the vision of Daniel and its specific prophetic time narrative found in chapter 12 be concerning things far in the past when it is an extension of the very last days concerning Daniel 11:44, 45 and Daniel 12:1-4? Why would God painstakingly build up such a climax to the time of the end just to have the climax be what happened in the distant past? The contextual logic is that He is expanding the explanation and details of the very "time of the end". The Lord wants us to know specifically what we are going to have to endure and prepare for. He wants us to know that "blessed is he who waiteth and cometh to the one thousand, three hundred, FIVE, and thirty days". I capitalized the word "five" because of the way the number of the 1335 days was expressed. One of the eschatological shadows of the sanctuary system shows us the last day significance of that. Comparing these things with the SOP gives us all the exact times and events of "the time of trouble" made up of the "short time of trouble" and the "great time of trouble". Those who go through the 1335 are going to have the same kind of experience that Jesus had when he entered into and lived out the last 3 1/2 years of His life upon the earth. This is why they are so blessed. They will go through the Gethsemane experience. They will know Christ like no other created being in the universe! "The people of God will not be free from suffering; but while persecuted and distressed, while they endure privation and suffer for want of food they will not be left to perish....Could men see with heavenly vision, they would behold companies of angels that excel in strength stationed about those who have kept the word of Christ's patience. With sympathizing tenderness, angels have witnessed their distress and have heard their prayers. They are waiting the word of their Commander to snatch them from their peril. But they must wait yet a little longer. The people of God must drink of the cup and be baptized with the baptism. The very delay, so painful to them, is the best answer to their petitions. As they endeavor to wait trustingly for the Lord to work they are led to exercise faith, hope, and patience, which have been too little exercised during their religious experience. Yet for the elect's sake, the time of trouble will be shortened." GC pp. 629.2630.2 "Blessed is he that waiteth and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days". "He" or no one has waited for 1335 years and come to the end of it to be blessed. However, one certainly could be alive at the beginning of 1335 days before Christ's second advent and by His grace endure through "the end of the days" (Daniel 12:13) of "the time of the end" to see and experience the deliverance of the "blessed hope" first hand. The word "he" represents this as a personal experience. Not a corporate one. "Waiteth" is referring to the first part of "the patience of the saints" and "cometh" represents the final victory in Christ for those who will be "baptized with the baptism": "the faith of Jesus". "Truth is an advancing truth". "We are to learn something new every day" in our daily communion and devotion with the Lord. Keep moving forward, brother, for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus. @@AngelsintheGlen
ok maybe I am confused here are you saying that Yashua and Michael are one in the same being? After all you’re referencing His being seated and Michael standing up? If so That is a Mormon view and in error. Let me demonstrate why. When Satand contended for the body of Moses Michael says the Lord rebuke you which is an appeal to a higher authority obviously God so Michael is not God. Jhon says in the beginning the word was with God and the word was God through Him and for Him were all thing made including angels including Michael; and the word became flesh and dwelt among us. Yashu is the word and as such God. For those that would find this strange, this is not saying He was or is God the Father. God is not a personal pro noun it is a description of authority. Yashua is not the ultimate authority, the Father is His God. He said I ascend to My God and Your God. But He is all the same the Lord. He would not need to look to any higher authority as there is only one and He and the Father are always in agreement. He is the only judge in Heven or on earth. He is the Lord Michael calls on to rebuke Satan.
Jesus is God and has always been one with the Father from time eternity. The Bible teaches us that Michael is one of many names for the eternal and divine Son of God, Jesus Christ. Please carefully understand this point. Before the eternal and divine Son of God (the Word) became flesh and dwelt among us, He first manifested Himself in the form of an angel before the creation of the world. The Bible teaches that Jesus took on the form of an angel before He placed His eternal and divine nature in human flesh at the incarnation. With that context please watch our Michael video here for a more detailed explanation. (We are not Mormon) www.angelsintheglen.org/michael
@@AngelsintheGlen I haven't finished listening but I'm reading the comments as I go along. You have said that JESUS is GOD and is one with the Father. Please let me know if they are two separate persons. Also, if JESUS is GOD what does that make the FATHER. Thank you
Sarah Ward . I don't believe in Catholic Christianity.! Its not the same as Jesus Christ's Christianity.! To the Catholics religious beliefs. The Pope is their Saviour. .their Priest.!
First, Jesus is God. He has always been God and will always be one with the God the Father and the Holy Spirit. Jesus is eternal, all powerful, all knowing, ever present with His church, holy, self-existent, and unchangeable. But, as you know, in the fullness of time, Jesus, the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity and became the God-man Jesus Christ at the incarnation. What we explain from the scriptures is that BEFORE the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity, He first placed Himself in angel form and was the protector of ancient Israel as the Angel of the LORD. The Angel of the LORD who protected Israel is Michael the Archangel. Christ was in the OT as the God-angel, i.e., the Angel of the LORD, and He was the God-man in the NT, Jesus Christ. If we critically examine the scriptures, this will become readily apparent. Please understand that we are not the first to point this out. Many of the great Protestant Reformers also came to this conclusion. This includes Martin Luther, the father of the Reformation. Luther's associate Philip Melanchthon. The second father of the Reformation, John Calvin. The Baptist preacher Charles Spurgeon. Even John Wesley, the greatest preacher since the Apostle Paul came to this same conclusion. We can name many other great theologians and scholars, however, our purpose in putting this series together is that we've lost deep Bible study in our Churches and we need to reinvigorate the study of the scriptures like the Bereans, closely examining and testing the scriptures to see if they are true. We're still working on this video series, but please stick with us in these studies.
First, Jesus is God. He has always been God and will always be one with the God the Father and the Holy Spirit. Jesus is eternal, all powerful, all knowing, ever present with His church, holy, self-existent, and unchangeable. But, as you know, in the fullness of time, Jesus, the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity and became the God-man Jesus Christ at the incarnation. What we explain from the scriptures is that BEFORE the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity, He first placed Himself in angel form and was the protector of ancient Israel as the Angel of the LORD. The Angel of the LORD who protected Israel is Michael the Archangel. Christ was in the OT as the God-angel, i.e., the Angel of the LORD, and He was the God-man in the NT, Jesus Christ. If we critically examine the scriptures, this will become readily apparent. Please understand that we are not the first to point this out. Many of the great Protestant Reformers also came to this conclusion. This includes Martin Luther, the father of the Reformation. Luther's associate Philip Melanchthon. The second father of the Reformation, John Calvin. The Baptist preacher Charles Spurgeon. Even John Wesley, the greatest preacher since the Apostle Paul came to this same conclusion. We can name many other great theologians and scholars, however, our purpose in putting this series together is that we've lost deep Bible study in our Churches and we need to reinvigorate the study of the scriptures like the Bereans, closely examining and testing the scriptures to see if they are true. As we said earlier, we're still working on the video series, but please stick with us in these studies.
Sarah Ward. If you can't believe in Jesus Christ and the Gospel of Christianity. . what else is there to believe in ? Without believing in Jesu's work at the cross His death and Resurrection as the first fruits from the dead. Then you. Might as well not believe in anyone or anything.!
That day is 2021. How do I know? Because the book of Daniel was written starting in 604 BC. If you add 604 to the current date of 2021 you get a sum of 2625. Take that span of years 2625 and minus 1290 you get the sum of 1335. America is Mystery Babylon. Daniel proves that out as well. Remember that a day is like a thousand years and a thousand years is like a day.
Deuteronomy 18:22 When a prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him.
Pastor just a hint to you. Johannes 12, revelations 12, and Daniel 12 talks about the SAME THING. Jesus said in Joh 12. Now the prince of this World is CASTED. In Revel 12 Satan is CASTED. In Daniel 12 IS THE SATAN CASTED.
Using SDA doctrines, not Biblical. Daniel 8 is set in Greecian Empire as Gabriel points out Daniel 8:21-23 making a 457 Persian Empire start date impossible. Furthermore the 457 date is for building Jerusalem and can't be when the Temple is defiled from.
This is not a denominational doctrine. This is a Biblical doctrine. You are watching the Daniel 12 video, however, please go back to our Daniel 8 video to understand the framework of the two visions that Daniel sees, viz., the mareh and the chazown. Those two visions and their relationships establish the framework for the rest of Daniel (chapters 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12). Without an understanding of the two visions and their relationship, one cannot accurately understand the rest of the book. The 457 B.C. date is further explained in our Daniel 9 video. Critically evaluate everything we say in those videos. Notice how we methodically walk through verse by verse using only the Bible and history to confirm the prophecies. Hold us to the highest Biblical standard. You be the judge based upon what we say in those videos. However, to fully appreciate the entire book of Daniel, please critically evaluate our Daniel 1 video. We explain that the entire theme of the book is found in the first two verses, Daniel 1:1-2. Understanding the theme sets the stage for a comprehensive understanding of all the prophecies in Daniel.
First, Jesus is God. He has always been God and will always be one with the God the Father and the Holy Spirit. Jesus is eternal, all powerful, all knowing, ever present with His church, holy, self-existent, and unchangeable. But, as you know, in the fullness of time, Jesus, the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity and became the God-man Jesus Christ at the incarnation. What we explain from the scriptures is that BEFORE the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity, He first placed Himself in angel form and was the protector of ancient Israel as the Angel of the LORD. The Angel of the LORD who protected Israel is Michael the Archangel. Christ was in the OT as the God-angel, i.e., the Angel of the LORD, and He was the God-man in the NT, Jesus Christ. If we critically examine the scriptures, this will become readily apparent. Please understand that we are not the first to point this out. Many of the great Protestant Reformers also came to this conclusion. This includes Martin Luther, the father of the Reformation. Luther's associate Philip Melanchthon. The second father of the Reformation, John Calvin. The Baptist preacher Charles Spurgeon. Even John Wesley, the greatest preacher since the Apostle Paul came to this same conclusion. We can name many other great theologians and scholars, however, our purpose in putting this series together is that we've lost deep Bible study in our Churches and we need to reinvigorate the study of the scriptures like the Bereans, closely examining and testing the scriptures to see if they are true.
Sarah Ward. In the King James bible ! Time Time and a half times is the Tribulations...In the end of days. Before the second coming of Christ. We the Church will be Raptures before the Tribulations starts.! There is no way Jesus will let His Bride go though the wrath of God on the earth.! And Jesus Christ is God in the flesh not Michel the Arch Angel.! You are confusing everything. Did Michel create the heavens and the earth ? No. My bible KJV says The Holy Spirit of God did.!
Jesus Christ is God who became a man. He is the God-man who redeemed mankind from sin. Jesus Christ is eternal. He has always existed with the Father. Jesus Christ created all things. Everything that has come into existence has come by the power and wisdom of Jesus Christ. Michael is simply another name for Jesus. Please see our video on this topic. We explain how and why this is so. Please click here to watch: www.angelsintheglen.org/michael Also, the time, times, and half a time occurred in the past. Please watch our entire video series starting with Daniel 1. We explain the relationship between all the time prophecies and their significance. All time prophecies in the Bible are now fulfilled and in the past. And the Church will most certainly be on the earth during the time of great tribulation. Just as the Hebrews were in the land of Goshen when the plagues fell on Egypt, so too, will the Church be on earth when the last seven plagues of Revelation 16 will fall on the entire world. However, just as God protected His people from the plagues in Egypt, so too, will God protect His Church during the end times. Our entire series is to prepare men and women to understand exactly what must take place prior to the second coming of Christ. It's not a time to fear it's a time to be ready. God wants His people ready for the soon return of Jesus Christ. Please watch our entire series. Critically examine everything we say. We welcome any critical feedback based on our presentation of the word of God. You can reach out directly to us on our website if you have any questions. Thanks.
Only Jehovah witness believe the Jesus is Micheal the Ark angel. So you are saying they are correct? There are 250 scriptures of angels in scripture, show me where it says that Jesus is Michael the ark angel? It doesn't. I have not seen Daniel interpret like this before, so I have been listening to what you have to say, but you discredit yourself in doing this.
First, Jesus is God. We demonstrate from scripture that Jesus is divine. He is considered the 2nd person of the Godhead. We have 8 videos to address all the scriptures that acknowledge that Jesus as God. Second, Jesus is man. When the fullness of time came, Jesus, who is God, placed Himself in humanity. This is called the incarnation and is the union of God and man in the personhood of Jesus. Third, we explain from the scriptures that BEFORE Jesus (the 2nd person of the Godhead) placed Himself in humanity, He first placed Himself in angel form and was the protector of ancient Israel as the Angel of the LORD. The Angel of the LORD who protected Israel is Michael the Archangel. Christ was in the OT as the God-angel, i.e., the Angel of the LORD, and He was the God-man in the NT, Jesus Christ. Please understand that we are not the first to point this out. Many of the great Protestant Reformers also realized this truth by examining the scriptures. This includes Martin Luther, the father of the Reformation. Luther's associate Philip Melanchthon. The second father of the Reformation, John Calvin. The Baptist preacher Charles Spurgeon. Even John Wesley, the greatest preacher (since the Apostle Paul) came to this same conclusion. We can name many other great theologians and scholars, however, our purpose in putting this series together is that we've lost deep Bible study in our Churches, and we need to reinvigorate the study of the scriptures like the Bereans, closely examining and testing the scriptures to see if they are true.
Jesus is God and has always been God. Jesus is the eternal God who has always existed with God and the Holy Spirit. Michael is simply another name for Jesus. We have a new video coming out soon that will explain all the Biblical references to Michael and that He is the eternal Son of God.
Michael the great prince is not Jesus Christ. Hebrews 1:5 NKJV For to which of the angels did He ever say: "You are My Son, Today I have begotten You"? And again: "I will be to Him a Father, And He shall be to Me a Son"? Michael is a created angel.
Thank you for your comment. We will address Hebrews 1:5 in a new video series that is in production right now. For now, we want to provide some context. First, Jesus is God. He has always been God and will always be one with the God the Father and the Holy Spirit. Jesus is eternal, all powerful, all knowing, ever present with His church, holy, self-existent, and unchangeable. But, as you know, in the fullness of time, Jesus, the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity and became the God-man Jesus Christ at the incarnation. What we explain from the scriptures is that BEFORE the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity, He first placed Himself in angel form and was the protector of ancient Israel as the Angel of the LORD. The Angel of the LORD who protected Israel is Michael the Archangel. Christ was in the OT as the God-angel, i.e., the Angel of the LORD, and He was the God-man in the NT, Jesus Christ. If we critically examine the scriptures, this will become readily apparent. Please understand that we are not the first to point this out. Many of the great Protestant Reformers also came to this conclusion. This includes Martin Luther, the father of the Reformation. Luther's associate Philip Melanchthon. The second father of the Reformation, John Calvin. The Baptist preacher Charles Spurgeon. Even John Wesley, the greatest preacher since the Apostle Paul came to this same conclusion. We can name many other great theologians and scholars, however, our purpose in putting this series together is that we've lost deep Bible study in our Churches and we need to reinvigorate the study of the scriptures like the Bereans, closely examining and testing the scriptures to see if they are true. As we said earlier, we're still working on the video series, but please stick with us in these studies.
@@AngelsintheGlen Hi. I appreciate your response, I really do. Melchizedek is another similar issue. I am always open to hearing and reasoning out scripture. I will keep a look out for the teaching you do on this matter, or you could notify me. Thanks again.
@@theophobia-uk You're welcome and thanks. How about this: While we work on the additional videos, maybe you can critically evaluate our Daniel series beginning in Daniel 1. You can visit our website directly to access those videos and watch them in sequence. If you do, you can also contact us directly through our website contact page.
Some of these teachings are valuable but then some are just plain erroneous... Michael is Jesus who is YA'OH? So you not only worship a 3 headed god like the Hindus and so many others but you worship a 4 headed god. Definitely not a scholar
We're not sure the point you are trying to make, but we'll provide some thoughts to consider. Let us briefly explain what's going on. First, Jesus is God. He has always been God and will always be one with the God the Father and the Holy Spirit. Jesus is eternal, all powerful, all knowing, ever present with His church, holy, self-existent, and unchangeable. However, as you know, in the fullness of time, Jesus, the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity and become the God-man Jesus Christ at the incarnation. What we explain from the scriptures is that BEFORE the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity, He first placed Himself in angel form and was the protector of ancient Israel as the Angel of the LORD. The Angel of the LORD who protected Israel is Michael the Archangel. Christ was in the OT as the God-angel, i.e., the Angel of the LORD, and He was the God-man in the NT, Jesus Christ. If we critically examine the scriptures, this will become readily apparent. Please understand that we are not the first to point this out. Many of the great Protestant Reformers also came to this conclusion. This includes Martin Luther, the father of the Reformation. Luther's associate Philip Melanchthon. The second father of the Reformation, John Calvin. The Baptist preacher Charles Spurgeon. Even John Wesley, the greatest preacher since the Apostle Paul came to this same conclusion. We can name many other great theologians and scholars, however, our purpose in putting this series together is that we've lost deep Bible study in our Churches and we need to reinvigorate the study of the scriptures like the Bereans, closely examining and testing the scriptures to see if they are true. We're still working on the Michael series but please consider watching this series as they become available.
![ค้าง (STILL) - GEMINI [ OFFICIAL MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ftxx3hk5vkU/mqdefault.jpg)
What is the significance of this chapter and the two additional time prophecies (the 1290 & 1335)? Timings for topics covered in this lesson:
- 2:01 What happens at the end of time
- 6:19 Why is Daniel told to seal up the words?
- 8:13 What does it mean that knowledge will increase in Daniel 12?
- 12:09 How long until the end of the wonders? What is the abomination of desolation?
- 31:01 How all the time prophecies of Daniel are related
For more on Daniel chapter 12 and to get the resources, visit: www.angelsintheglen.org/daniel12
Sadly, I understood 10 minutes in this was one of those RCC/Beast/False Prophet teachings, which is in error. For starters, the 2300 Evening and Mornings are by definition 1150 days. The 1260 that is spoken of happens in the middle of the 70th week. That is when the Anti-Christ Conquers Jerusalem, the very scripture tells us that, from the time the holy peoples are scattered there will be 1260 days until these wonders end {Second Coming ends what Daniel was seeing}.
Then the 1290 happens BEFORE the 1260 in that it is the False Prophet {Jewish High Priest} TAKING AWAY the Sacrifice {Jesus Worship by the Jews who repent BEFORE the DOTL like Malachi 4:5-6 says}. So, in verse 8 Daniel asks the EXACT SAME QUESTION as the Anel asked Jesus earlier, How long until these wonders end. So the 1290 is 1290 days from the Second Coming or 30 days before the Anti-Christ Conquers Jerusalem. This is the 30 days the Jews need in order to Flee Judea unto the Petra/Bozrah area.
The 1335 comes before both the 1290 and 1260 therefore it is 1335 days BEFORE the Second Coming ends all these wonders....Psssttt, everything is REVERSED. The Two-witnesses are that Blessing, Elijah shows up BEFORE the DOTL just like Malachi 4:5-6 says. Thus the Jews have repented by the time the 1290 AoD arrives and thus know to Flee..............before the Beast Conquers Jerusalem.
@@MrRondonmon Thanks for your comment. There’s a lot to cover. Not sure we’ll be able to address all your points and implied points, however, our divergent views have their origins in how a “day” in Bible prophecy is interpreted. We believe a “day” is translated as a literal year for all the time prophecies in Daniel and Revelation. We believe this is a consistent and an accurate interpretation as supported by many scriptures throughout the Bible. Please see Ezekiel 4; Number 14; and Genesis 29 as examples.
Ezekiel 4:4-6 (NASB) 4 "As for you, lie down on your left side and lay the iniquity of the house of Israel on it; you shall bear their iniquity for the number of days that you lie on it. 5 "For I have assigned you a number of days corresponding to the years of their iniquity, three hundred and ninety days; thus you shall bear the iniquity of the house of Israel. 6 "When you have completed these, you shall lie down a second time, but on your right side and bear the iniquity of the house of Judah; I have assigned it to you for forty days, a day for each year.
The day-year principle is also found in Numbers 14:34 (forty days to spy the land and forty years of guilt); Genesis 29:20, 27 (a week equals seven years). There are many other Biblical references supporting the day-year principle. As such, all the time prophecies in Daniel (time, times, ½ time, 2300, 70 week, 1290, 1335, and Revelation (42 months, 1260) are all literal years.
Based upon what you have written, it seems that the day-year principle is inconsistently applied. For example, it seems you imply that the “70th week” is a total of seven years. If that is correct, then why are the 1260, the 1290, the 1335 all considered literal days or in the case of the 2300 they are considered half days? It is simply not consistent to use literal years and then switch to literal days. As such, we cannot find any Biblical evidence or reasoning to support this interpretation. Also, what is written implies the “gap” theory to the 70th week of Daniel 9. We cannot find any reasoning in the Bible to simply jump thousands of years into the future and insert a “seven year period” without any precedent or marker as to when the 70th week would start (and then insert 1260, 1290, and 1335 time prophecies). This runs counter to a God who wants His people ready for end-time events. God doesn’t want us to be surprised. He wants us ready. We demonstrate how all the time prophecies in Daniel and Revelation are related in our Daniel 7 and 8 videos and they all consistently use the day-year principle.
In addition, we do not interpret the prophecies of Daniel and Revelation with a literal temple in literal Jerusalem with a literal Jewish High Priest. Everything after the cross would point to the Heavenly Temple and the Church on earth (which is a part of the Heavenly Jerusalem through the cross of Christ). We will make this very clear in our Revelation 11 and 12 videos (to be posted later in June) That is, the Church, while on earth, is the body of Christ with Christ as the head. For example, Saul (later Paul) would have an encounter with Jesus on the road to Damascus. Jesus appeared to him and asked him why he was persecuting Him (Jesus). How could Saul persecute Jesus after He ascended to heaven? Saul could do this because the church is the body of Christ. If you persecute the body, you persecute Christ.
This is why we believe that looking to a literal temple in literal Jerusalem is one of the biggest mistakes happening in the Christian Church today. Many are taking the words of Jesus and mis-applying them literally, when he meant spiritually. There are many examples in the Bible.
When Jesus said to destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up, they thought He was talking about the literal temple. We know He was talking about His physical body and resurrection. Nicodemus thought that to be born again he had to somehow enter a second time into his mother’s womb. Jesus would have to explain that it was a spiritual re-birth and correct a teacher of Israel. The women at the well thought that the water Jesus offered her would eliminate any future need to quench her physical thirst. Jesus would be speaking of the Holy Spirit dwelling within us. These stories in John 2, 3, and 4 (and there are plenty more) provide us warning of how the Jews interpreted Jesus words as literal when He was speaking of the spiritual.
Thanks for checking us out and watching.
@@AngelsintheGlen It can be but is not always a year. Just like the 7 days of a groom and bride spends in the father's house represents the 7 years the bride spends in Heaven. And just like the 70 weeks total 490 years. But at other times, as you well know, the prophecy is day fir day, and year for year. So we have to go by the context of the scriptures. We know this is the END TIMES, all we have to do is read Daniel 12:1-2 and we can see this is the end time because Daniel is told it's the end time when the righteous are judged and raised up. We are also told Micheal STANDS UP, and we see Micheal STANDS UP in Rev. 12, don't we? So, when Gabriel askes Jesus (Man in Linen) how long until these wonders end, Jesus tells him that it will be 1260 days from the time the holy people are conquered, until these wonders end (Second Coming) and in verses 1 and 2 we are told this is the VERY END when men are Judged !! So, the day means nothing, we know it can go both ways, you have to follow the contextual argument put forth, and that shows that Daniel is being told these are END TIME EVENTS !! Antiochus is THE TYPE, then we see the Anti-Christ in verses 36-45. If we read history and the book of Maccabeans, we can see the TYPE False Prophet in Jason, who bribed Antiochus to become the High Priest, having his Pious brother Onias III killed, he then tried to Hellenize the Jews, leading unto the Maccabean Revolt. Daniel 12 is the END TIMES.
The Temple will be rebuilt, Jesus says that which OUGHT NOT STAND in Matt. 25:15, there is nothing g standing in the holy of holies in Heaven, he is speaking about ON EARTH. The 70 years the Jews had to stay in Babylon was 70 actual years. There is all kind of prophecies that go day by day, as you well know, so my point remains a prophetic uttering can go either way, days can be used fr days or literal years. But when the days are actual days, the context fills us in, we know the 70th week is only 7 years, so a Prophetic uttering of 1260 Days within the 70th week can only mean days.
As per the 2300, REREAD the chapter with a strong's beside you. The word used for DAY is not ONE WORD, it is TWO WORDS, and further on in the chapter (LOL) it is called Evening and Morning, not Day, the exact same reference is described differently. Now read Daniel 9:21 where he is praying, he says about te time of the EVENING OBLATION !! The Jews had a MORNING offering/oblation/tribute unto God AND and Evening offering/oblation/tribute unto God every day. So, when it says there will be 2300 days, THAT IS NOT what the Hebrew Text actually says, it says there will be, 2300..........Evening and Morning Sacrifices, GO LOOK IT UP, which means 1150 total days because there are 2 sacrifices each day. I will post it here fir you brother.
Daniel 8:14 And he said 559 z8799 unto x413 me, Unto x5704 two thousand 505 and three 7969 hundred 3967 *days; 6153 1242* then shall the sanctuary 6944 be cleansed. 6663 z8738
NOTICE the TWO NUMBERS behind days above? WATCH
6153, Ereb = Dusk
1242 , Boqer = Dawn or break of day.
Verses 12 and 13 is talking about the Daily Sacrifices being taken away, and then we are told there will be 2300 that are taken away..........Not days, but Evening and Morning Sacrifices. To prove the translators were clueless here, THIS IS FUNNY, the translate the same two words totally different in the SAME CHAPTER. (LOL)
And the vision 4758 *of the evening 6153 and the morning 1242* which x834 was told 559 z8738 [is] true: 571 wherefore shut thou up 5640 z8798 x859 the vision; 2377 for x3588 it [shall be] for many 7227 days. 3117
LOL, above they call it the Evening and the Morning, not THE DAY................Because that is what it is. Thus, Gabriel was telling Daniel that Israel would miss 1150 Daily Sacrifices before the Sanctuary was CLEANSED.
As per your "THEORY QUIP" God gave us a Prophecy in THREES, He did not give us ONE prophecy, we got three specific prophesies for a reason. a 49-year prophecy, a 434 year prophesy and a 7 year prophesy. God is dealing with Israel's sin, BEFORE this punishment can be abated, Israel has to repent, thus the 70th week can not be finished until Israel repents, Jesus dying does not make a nation repent sir. The Church Age came, Israel were as what ? Dead Men's Bones for 2000 years, so there was o Israel because they refused to repent, thus the 70th week is designed to get Israel to repent. I will tell you a little secret, if Israel had repented 2000 years ago, there would have been no Church Age !! 70 AD would have been when Jesus saved the Jews from the Fourth Beast, but they refused to turn from their wickedness, and God foreknew this and thus they became as Dead Men's Bones unto God, e turned his back on them. God doesn't really care if we can grasp His ways or not, if we seek His face in humility, He will show us his ways.
The Beasts all went away because there was NO ISRAEL. The Church delivered a Mortal Wound to the Beast. Once we are raptured, the Anti-Christ Conquers Jerusalem and the MANY in the Mediterranean Sea Region to become the Beast (WOUND is healed) again. The tie of the Gentiles will be over, just like Jacob and Esau, the Elder served the younger, right now the Elder is serving the younger, but soon Israel will have to repent, and then God/Jesus will DWELL (Tabernacle) with her for 1000 years. That is the LAST FEAST (Tabernacle). The 7 Feasts of Leviticus 23 tell us the whole history of the world !!
Fall Feasts
1.) Feast of Passover (Jesus fulfilled)
2.) Feast of First-fruits (Jesus was the first-fruits of the grave)
3.) Feast of Unleavened Bread (Jesus was without sin)
Summer Harvest
4.) Feast of Weeks/Pentecost/Harvest/Church Age ( We are now harvesting sould for God/Jesus, this is on the calendar all unto itself, the Trumpets or Shofars ALWAYS SOUNDED to end the Harvest !! At the Last Trump the Church Age ends.................And then what happens? LOOK AND SEE)
Fall Feasts
5.) Feast of Trumps (This never did much except make announcements, thus the Trumpets Ends the Harvest or Church Age, and in Rev. 4:1 it says Jesus' voice is as the sound of a Trumpet. In other words, it reverberates and only the saved in Christ Jesus can hear it via the Holy Spirit. Then the Trumpet sounds and it signifies that the Feasts of Atonement and Tabernacle are NIGH AT HAND )
6.) Feast of Atonement (You smell this rat yet? Israel must ATONE before the 70th week can end, the very prophecy tells us that. So, Israel repents/atones, just like Malachi 4:5-6 says and Zechariah 13:8-9 says.)
7.) Feast of Tabernacle (Jesus DWELLS with Israel for 1000 years. The Fall Feasts are then completed.
The Papacy is the WRONG ANGLE, as is the Islamic Anti--Christ. He's a Gentile King from Europe, and he has a sidekick who will be a Jewish High Priest.
Sorry I took so long, overlooked this
@@MrRondonmon So sorry. We'll just have to agree to disagree with every point you make.
@@AngelsintheGlen And you will have to answer for your falsehoods one day sir. Have a nice day.
Really enjoy teachings on Daniel .2024 thanks
I am highly motivated spiritually by your words brother Mark.
Thanks for the feedback. God bless you. Please watch our entire series beginning in Daniel 1. We have a complete series on the prophecies in Daniel and Revelation.
God Bless u all....
Knowledge IS POWER.
Where in the Bible does it tell us that Jesus is Michael? Jesus is the 'I am' and no angel would dare say that!
Thanks for your question. The answer to your question is found in this video: th-cam.com/video/FeS9Gta-6nw/w-d-xo.html
Also, Jesus is the Eternal God. He has always existed with God the Father. In the link above, we demonstrate from the Bible that another name for Jesus is Michael as well as how Jesus appeared in the OT. We cover this topic with many scriptures in both the OT and NT and much more. Thanks for you question and watching our videos!
Yeah caught that to he doesn't know much
@@kurtcunningham9899 Michael rebukes satan saying "The Lord rebukes you" he didn't say the Lord "will" rebuke you because his WORD is that rebuke my friend. Michael is asleep and preparing to arise as we speak
@@briananderson1246 incorrect! If youll read just prior to what you just wrote it says michael dared not make an accusation. You really think there is anything Jesus would dare not do?
Wait. What? Satan is the accuser. Why would Christ need to accuse anyone? He is the judge. He doesn’t make accusations, He passes judgement.
That said, the various English translations can cause some confusion. The ESV translates Daniel 10:13 as “...Michael, one of the Chief princes...” That translation certainly eliminates Christ as a possibility because Christ is not ONE OF the chief princes (plural). He is above and beyond all other princes. The scriptures do say that when Christ returns, He will sound with the VOICE OF archangel. Scripture is clear that God spoke THROUGH his prophets (Heb. 1:1). Daniel is identified as a prophet, but he never claimed to be God, likewise with king David. So another possibility is that when Christ returns, He will announce through His archangel, Michael. I think the important thing is to study it with a humble, open mind and be careful not to decide our doctrine based on our preconceived notions. Clearly, this is a subject that requires us to give it more, detailed study. The most important thing of all is that Christ is not diminished in our lives. Regardless of who, exactly, Michael is, God has made our savior clear to us. Michael is an angelic form, whether a manifestation of Christ or not, that fact seems subordinate to the fact that we are mankind. Therefore, OUR Savior is the Son of Man (known to us as Jesus of Nazareth). As long as we remember that the main thing is to keep the Main Thing as the main thing, the other topics are doctrinal “trivia” for lack of a better term. As long as Christ is not made subordinate to anything in our view and our lives, we are safe to study out these ideas.
Hosea 2:20 in the amplified Bible says and you shall cherish the Lord. You shall appreciate the Lord. You shall recognize the Lord. You shall give heed to the Lord. You shall be acquainted with the Lord.
It goes right along with James 4:5 in the amplified Bible it says The Spirit Whom He has caused to dwell in us yearns over us and He yearns for the Spirit to be welcome with a jealous love.
HOW BEAUTIFUL HALLELUJAH
Get right with God, repent, practise and know. Be a light unto the world. Thanks to the bible OT & NT.
Oh what a Savior!
Incredible ❤❤ love your teaching
I pray ,in the Lord you can
Meet the angel of God to EXPERIENCE the wonderful wonder of HEAVEN and God
Started sharing in Malaysia, etc….all over. Next will do chapters 8-9, then 1-7. Clear teachings, well done!
Jesus coming back soon repent and give God the glory 🙏.
Michael is NOT Jesus Michael is an angel, you lost all credibility
Please watch the video in the below link and read the comments we've provided in that video. Jesus has always been an eternal being and one with the God the Father. He has existed for all eternity. In the video, we point out the scriptures that sometimes He took the form of an angel. Taking the form of an angel and being a created angel are two different things. The video will explain that. Thanks.
th-cam.com/video/FeS9Gta-6nw/w-d-xo.html
Yep he reads from a jehovah witness bible he's a fraud wolf in sheeps clothing i rebuke him in the name of our savior Jesus the Christ
@@kurtcunningham9899 where does he show he's reading from a Jehovah's witness bible? He admits that Yeshua aka Jesus is God in the flesh and Jehovah's witnesses do not profess this Truth
@@briananderson1246 Yea but one of their teachings is that Jesus is Michael the Archangel. Sorry - I don't believe that at all. It is false.
@@engelabezuidenhout8610 I havnt found it to be false 🤔 it's not populer but not much truth is...
Amen
Solid reading!, Daniel 12:4 has a fairly straightforward reading, but you have gotta remember, the prophecies are always going to unwind themselves, so there's no room for men to interpret, but what Daniel was prophesying to, you alluded to, he actually prophesied to what we're living today... "And knowledge will increase" that word increase in Hebrew, depending upon your translation, is "explosion" Daniel was prophesying about the industrial revolution which had not happened yet... but in a short-season past the liberation of Christians from the tyranny and oppression of Rome, in 1798, the industrial revolution was less than fifty years later.
During the days of the pre-industrial era, man was [by-in-large] traveling by horse-drawn buggy - in less than fifty years later, we were driving, less than 50 years from that time we were flying... an "explosion" indeed.
The industrial revolution would turn the world upside down, it was such a blessing because an average man could have an idea and make wealth beyond what monarchies possessed - now we can see where satan's den of influence was getting rocked, and the push towards government centralization came out of that period.
Great study!
Christ consciousness will come in full then Christ will return for a perfect church god is all in all and all shall be saved
Watched some of this. Haven’t heart of 380 AD. Thought 313 was when Christianity was accepted with the Edit of Milan? Rest makes sense. You make it easy to understand; very nice. Curious, clothes, tee shirts, sneakers, etc have their names on them…example Nike or Reebok, etc…or even a picture on clothes…is that an idol?
They are only idols if one's heart is so attached and attracted to them. For example, does the person find their identity and value as a person associated with a specific brand name or icon? That is, do they need to wear them as a display to others for identity? or does the person simply wear them because the clothes fit or are of high quality. It all depends on the heart of the individual.
@@AngelsintheGlen thank-you.
@@AngelsintheGlen for years received church anger where they say no mix or synthetic fibers; think an EW thing. But I wear practical, durable, plain things, many polyester, synthetic, some plastic boots to stay dry in so much rain in Seattle type weather. Comfort and practical things to last to the end w/o getting tire of them no matter how worn they are, but churches seem to keep one’s focus on so much things like being lost if women wear pants, etc. (per EW they say).
What do you think about Uriah Smith’s assertion that “the daily” is a mistranslation and actually just means the continuous, actually referring to Pagan Rome, not to the sacrificial system?
We provide a Biblical explanation and definition of what "the daily" is in our Daniel 8 and 9 videos. Please critically evaluate it and judge for yourself.
Very interesting, some previous comments raised questions, akso key words "end", so a lot of previous centuries should have little weight, nevertheless grateful for discussing it.
In the Hebrew when Michael stands up it means he ceases or stops what happens after he ceases or stops all hell breaks loose. So could it mean he stops restraining
Great teaching! A few years ago I discovered that virtually all churches in the USA are state churches by virtue of IRS codes. There are still a few “Free” churches that are not 501C3 tax exempt to avoid being owned by the state. A great book on the subject is “In Caesar’s Grip”.
“501c3 churches are prohibited from addressing, in any tangible way, the vital issues of the day.”
“For a 501c3 church to openly speak out, or organize in opposition to, anything that the government declares "legal," even if it is immoral (e.g. abortion, homosexuality, etc.), that church will jeopardize its tax exempt status. The 501c3 has had a "chilling effect" upon the free speech rights of the church. LBJ was a shrewd and cunning politician who seemed to well-appreciate how easily many of the clergy would sell out.”
“Did the church ever need to seek permission from the government to be exempt from taxes? Were churches prior to 1954 taxable? No, churches have never been taxable. To be taxable a church would first need to be under the jurisdiction, and therefore under the taxing authority, of the government. The First Amendment clearly places the church outside the jurisdiction of the civil government: "Congress shall make NO LAW respecting an establishment of religion, nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof." hushmoney.org/501c3-facts.htm
1) This is totally irrelevant to the discussion (or most anything else, really).
2) There are MANY, MANY Christian churches in the USA that openly speak out against political policies and societal norms. In fact, one of the largest churches in the USA (which I do not attend nor am I a member of), Lakewood Church in Houston, TX that is pastored by Joel Osteen openly said on TV that homosexuality is a sin. That is in direct opposition to American societal norms and its taboo to say it. I, myself, have had 2 comments (in other videos) deleted off TH-cam for saying that. So there are still Christian churches that speak out and preach the Word.
How is the daily sacrifice that is taken away related to 508 aD?
We believe the answer is given from about minute :30 to minute :42 in this video. "the daily" was first defined and identified back in Daniel 8 and 9 videos. See Daniel 9 part 4 specifically for a review of "the daily". What Clovis does is accept and embrace the church-state system which is the means by which the "the daily" - the law of God (which is the gospel, which is the eternal covenant, which is the word of God, which is Christ Himself) - is removed. This abomination would go on for a time, times, and a half of time during the church-state system of the middle ages.
Is Michael the great prince is the same as Jesus Christ?
Yes, but let us briefly explain what's going on.
First, Jesus is God. He has always been God and will always be one with the God the Father and the Holy Spirit. Jesus is eternal, all powerful, all knowing, ever present with His church, holy, self-existent, and unchangeable. However, as you know, in the fullness of time, Jesus, the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity and become the God-man Jesus Christ at the incarnation.
What we explain from the scriptures is that BEFORE the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity, He first placed Himself in angel form and was the protector of ancient Israel as the Angel of the LORD. The Angel of the LORD who protected Israel is Michael the Archangel. Christ was in the OT as the God-angel, i.e., the Angel of the LORD, and He was the God-man in the NT, Jesus Christ. If we critically examine the scriptures, this will become readily apparent.
Please understand that we are not the first to point this out. Many of the great Protestant Reformers also came to this conclusion. This includes Martin Luther, the father of the Reformation. Luther's associate Philip Melanchthon. The second father of the Reformation, John Calvin. The Baptist preacher Charles Spurgeon. Even John Wesley, the greatest preacher since the Apostle Paul came to this same conclusion. We can name many other great theologians and scholars, however, our purpose in putting this series together is that we've lost deep Bible study in our Churches and we need to reinvigorate the study of the scriptures like the Bereans, closely examining and testing the scriptures to see if they are true. We're still working on the Michael series but please critically evaluate all the scriptures we provide which demonstrate this truth.
Did anything significant happen in the year 1844 AD, when the time period that Daniel talks about came to an end?
For example was there a huge earthquake or some political event that took place in 1844, to usher in the final end time period? (At the end of the Chazown period).
Yes. Two major events happened at the end of the 2300 evenings and mornings time prophecy. One was in heaven (see our Daniel 9 part 4 and part 5 videos) and the other on earth (see our Revelation 10 video).
However, to fully appreciate the answer, we recommend watching our entire Daniel series. Pay special attention to our Daniel 8 videos because they provide critical information to understand Daniel 9, 10, 11, 12, and Revelation 10.
Is the "acceptable year of the LORD" spoken in Isaiah 61 & Luke 4:19 a prophetic year that Jesus was speaking about in Daniel 12?
Which verse are you referring to in Daniel 12? Thanks.
If I may put in my 2 cents, I believe that the answer is yes. Isaiah seems to envision a messianic Jubilee which ends in the establishment of the nation. Jeremiah prophesied of the 70 Jubilee which were missed by Judah, and that is the basis for Daniel's 70 week prophecy. The ultimate "jubilee" would come at the end of the 1260 days when Christ returns from heaven. I think when all three of these prophecies are considered in light of the 11Q melchizidek scroll, and Jesus' time of visitation statement I would say that yes Danuel is basing his prophecy on Isaiahs prophecy is 11 and 61. God bless you
Kyle! Loved your thoughts on this, where did you study this
Michael is not Jesus, in my humble opinion. But thank you for the teaching anyway! God bless!
To be clear, Jesus is God. He is an eternal being. He is the beginning and the end. Michael just happens to be another name for Jesus. We explain this in more detail in our video. www.angelsintheglen.org/michael
However, , we recognize this is a teaching is not well received in the Christian Church. If you read the comments on the above video in youtube, you will see some very strong negative reactions to our teaching. However, please read our responses. Even at that we recognize many will not be convinced. However, we are undisturbed in our mission to preach and teach exactly what the Bible tells us. Thanks for watching our video and your comment.
I was surprise to hear Jesus to be called an angel, Jesus is God.Jesus is the word of God.John 1 :1 to 5.
@@janetfunmilola7736 ............angel in the Greek menas messenger - jesus was not an angel but he was God's chief messenger...he is God....he is also immanuel
You have to read carefully Daniel 10:12-17.
In verse 13, Daniel mentioned Michael came. At that time, he was alone there. Daniel always used to bow down when he sees angel. Definitely, this time also. He did not recognize who He really was.
Then, in verse 16, one who came, TOUCHED him. Then Daniel realized, "ONE HAVING LIKENESS OF THE SON OF MAN" stood before him and touched his lips.
* Michael is the Son of man.
WHO IS SON OF MAN, OTHER THAN JESUS?
Daniel 12:1-4 is talking about great white throne judgement. Daniel 12:5-13 is talking about the last half of the tribulation. I discern Daniel 12:11-12 in rapture explained video at The Lords Day Ministry channel.
Daniel 12:1-4 is talking about the final tribulation that will occur on the earth which will include the church. Daniel 12:5-13 has already occurred. It is in the past and has been fulfilled. In fact, all the time prophecies of Daniel and Revelation have been fulfilled. We explain all of them in our series.
We recommend watching our entire series beginning in Daniel 1 to under stand Daniel 12.
For example, the entire theme of Daniel is found in Daniel 1:1-2. Those two verses provide the framework for the entire book and are critical to understand the last verses of Daniel 12.
If one doesn't recognize the theme in Daniel 1:1-2, they will not be able to discern the meaning of the latter part of the book, nor key parts of Revelation.
You can contact us directly through our website if you have any questions.
@@AngelsintheGlen Daniel 12:2 says," And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt." This is the second resurrection. Revelation 20:6 tells us those in the first resurrection have no second death. So, since some that are resurrected in Daniel 12:2 have shame and everlasting contempt they have to be part of the second resurrection that happens before the great white throne judgement. There are only 2 resurrections.
And you are just flat out wrong about Daniel 12:5-13. It's talking about the tribulation to come.
The little horn in Daniel 7:8 is the anti christ. Daniel 11:36 is talking about the abomination desolation by the anti christ. He shall prosper until the second coming.
@@thelordsdayministry2026 We'll just have to agree to disagree. Please critically evaluate our teachings. Examine and test everything we have to say on this subject. We have provided detailed videos to explain our conclusions. We welcome critical feedback based on our logic and reasoning using the Bible (and history where it applies). You can reach out to us directly on our website with any questions.
@@AngelsintheGlen Explain to me where it says anything about a resurrection in the tribulation where people are resurrected to everlasting contempt. You can't. Everything I said is backed up by Scripture.
@@thelordsdayministry2026 on that specific point we agree. Please critically evaluate our entire series. Thanks.
Nooooo!! I have been watching all your teachings of Daniel until today. Yeshua is NOT the Archangel Michael. I wanted to watch the blue stone as well as revelation - but this is a deal breaker for me. Why does the Bible refer to "The angel of the Lord?" and not just call him Michael. The Angel of the Lord is Jesus/Yeshua not Michael. Jesus is not "one of" the chief princes. He is God. Just my opinion.
Please watch the blue stone study. We promise you, you will not be disappointed. Please watch all three parts of the blue stone and lets us know your thoughts. Contact us via our website if you'd like. Also, we'll be creating a more detailed video on Michael to make this very clear. We're not trying to push this point on Michael, but the Biblical evidences are clear. We stand by our teaching and will make it even clearer in a new video. We'll have many more scriptures and a detailed explanation that will make this teaching easier to digest and understand. Please stick with us in our series. Thanks
He lost me on this one also
Let’s trust the Holy Spirit to guide us and expose error. Therefore, let us be courageous in our study. There’s nothing wrong with asking questions and challenging our beliefs. Is Michael the angelic manifestation of Christ? I’m not sure, but I know that NOTHING can separate me from His love and salvation, so let us ask and study. If the idea is wrong, then discard it. If not, adopt it. Let’s wait until we’ve seen all the evidence he presents, then judge it.
“The spiritual person judges all things, but is himself to be judged by no one. “For who has understood the mind of the Lord so as to instruct him?” But we have the mind of Christ.”
1 Corinthians 2:15-16 ESV
@@mikefrady7965
Link to your video where you scripturally dispute this teaching. I’ll watch it.
Jehovah Witnesses believe Jesus is Michael the archangel. They get a lot wrong! Bad company to be in if you ask me.
You made an error sir. Jesus is not Michael nor was he ever refer to as Michael in the Bible. The Scripture or specific verse was talking about Michael the Archangel. I see a lot of doctrinal errors in your teachings.
Please watch this video to provide ample evidence that Michael is another name for Christ. th-cam.com/video/FeS9Gta-6nw/w-d-xo.html. Also, we'll be providing another more detailed video and go even deeper this this one. It will be coming out soon. Thanks. Please continue to stick with us throughout our entire series to understand exactly what must take place before Christ returns.
Is Jesus Emmanuel or not? Don’t get confused because of a symbolic name given for Christ. An angel also means messenger.
1 Thessalonians 4:16
For the 👉Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout👈, 👉with the voice of the archangel👈, and with the trump of God: and the 👉dead in Christ shall rise first👈
John 5:26-28
26 For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself;
27 And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because 👉he is the Son of man👈.
28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which 👉all that are in the graves👈 shall 👉hear his voice👈
Thessalonians says who will shout and the people in the graves will rise. John says the Son of man is the one that will be coming and those in the graves will hear his voice.
Do you think that the setting up of Sunday worship and it enforcement being also an idol, which is a false Sabbath, can this also lead to the abomination of desolation ?
Great question. We address it extensively in our Revelation videos and most specifically in our Revelation 13 video.
That is right I was waiting on you to say that at the end times many will go back and forth over the book and knowledge will increase now I want you to see something if Christianity is here at the end times still standing and the most high wake up the tribe of Judah this is where the back and forth of book will be dispute and in that dispute the chapters and verses will give knowledge and who is appointed to teach the book at the end times I will wake up the tribe of Judah and Judah which is the other nations and Judah will be the light the light is the truth. Prophecies it's rebuilding itself shalom and yes I am from the tribal this is the Great Awakening
CHRIST is God in the flesh.
Did you say Michael the great prince was Jesus ?
Is a Prince not next in line for the throne? He's seated and gathering insight to fight with the WORD of his mouth. I AM confident he will realise fully WHO he is SOON and we will behold him and his glory.
First, let us be clear. Jesus is God. Jesus is an eternal being. Jesus is from everlasting to everlasting. He is the alpha and omega. He has no beginning and no end. Jesus has been and will always be God.
Michael is simply another name for Christ. For example, in Jude 9 we see Michael the archangel. Archangel means “chief angel” or “first angel” (“angel” means messenger). Michael is the chief ruler of the angels. In other words, Christ is the chief ruler of the angels because Christ created them. When reading Daniel 10:13, Michael, who is the archangel in Jude 9, is the one, chief, prince. He is the number one.
In the link below we explain that Michael is simply another name for Christ. The name Michael means “who like/as God”. That is, Michael’s name is in the form of a question: Who is like God? The answer: No one. There is no one like God except God the Father, Jesus Christ the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
In the link below we go into more scriptures regarding this topic and how the pre-incarnate Christ was with His people in Israel as the angel of the Lord. Take Exodus 23:20-22 for example.
Exodus 23:20-22 (NASB) 20 "Behold, I am going to send an angel before you to guard you along the way and to bring you into the place which I have prepared. 21 "Be on your guard before him and obey his voice; do not be rebellious toward him, for he will not pardon your transgression, since My name is in him. 22 "But if you truly obey his voice and do all that I say, then I will be an enemy to your enemies and an adversary to your adversaries.
Notice in this verse that this particular angel must be obeyed and has the prerogative of pardoning transgression. No created angel has that level of authority or power. Only God. In this case, this is the pre-incarnate Christ Himself in angel form. Notice in that same passage that God says that “My name is in him”. Look at what Christ says in John 17:11-12 about His name.
John 17:11-12 (NASB) 11 "I am no longer in the world; and yet they themselves are in the world, and I come to You. Holy Father, keep them in Your name, the name which You have given Me, that they may be one even as We are. 12 "While I was with them, I was keeping them in Your name which You have given Me; and I guarded them and not one of them perished but the son of perdition, so that the Scripture would be fulfilled.
www.angelsintheglen.org/michael
@@AngelsintheGlen I've found you recently and am LOVING your unravelings. Thank you
@@briananderson1246 So happy to hear!
Hebrews 2:16 For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.
Heb.1:1-14; 2:6-18
BETTER UNDERSTAND
1) The 2,300 DAYS 👉th-cam.com/video/5Apj7oCiA_E/w-d-xo.html
2) The 75 Days 👉 th-cam.com/video/-_0jNqE41y0/w-d-xo.html
Charles Spurgeon, John Wesley, and John Calvin all agreed that Michael is another name for Jesus.
Thank you for your comment! We are working on a video to point that out. We recognize that many in the Christian Church do not know what the great reformers believed and taught. We will bring more attention to that in our upcoming video. Thank you!!
Doesn't make it true though
Calvin also brought Calvinism, so there's that...
@@Volleyball_Chess_and_Geoguessr true. But still. Theres a good biblical case for Michael being a theophany.
This teacher is telling me these days are actually years. Day is "Yom" in Hebrew. Jews consider Yom from sunset to sunset. 1 LITERAL DAY. AND... Jude 1:9. If Michael is Jesus, Michael would have said, "I rebuke you" - common sense and understanding key Hebrew words and phrases goes a long way. OY VEY!
There is a time and event missing here. In Hebrews 1:3 Jesus sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on HIgh, but that was after His ascension into heaven where He ministered to humanity in the holy place, not the most holy place of the heavenly sanctuary. It was in 1844 that first His Father and then Jesus as our high priest rose up from that throne and entered into the Most Holy Place of the second apartment. Where does it say in Bible prophecy that Jesus sat down upon the throne of God there? Isn't He standing there before His Father at the mercy seat, ministering the blood of His righteousness on our behalf and for the blotting out of sins in judgment of the saints? This prophetic imagery is found in Daniel 7:9, 10, 13, 14.
Another problem begins here is the explanation of Daniel 12:7. The explanation is perfectly fine for historic adventism, but historic adventism never came to a complete conclusion or understanding of these prophetic times and events. Back during the time of the rising of the little horn power of Daniel 7, this 1260 "time, times, and a dividing of time" was a day for year prophecy. However, in Daniel 12, we have come to the literal end days of the "time of the end".
The context of Daniel 12 is to finish the "time of the end". This vision is not about the "time of the past", but the "time of the end"; the future or eschatological days before the return of Christ. 1798, 1843, and 1844 did not fulfill the time of the end. The end of the Chadzown time period merely commenced the beginning of the time of the end which was to climax in events during the last 1335, 1290, and 1260 days approaching the day of Christ's return.
On another note: This historical on Arius is not validated in history except by the church fathers of the council of Nice age. There is no original accounts or documentation of Arius except from Catholic apologists of the time that Arius lived. We need to be careful about speculative history, especially when it comes from the great church system of blasphemy and abominations. The history of the formation of the trinity doctrine went along with all the other Roman Catholic code which if you did not follow, you were excommunicated and/or persecuted. So, if you did not believe in the Catholic trinity, which became known as the greatest Roman Catholic doctrine, you would be chastised, excommunicated, persecuted, and/or put in prison or put to death, if you did not recant. Does that give you confidence in the truth of the Roman Catholic Trinity?
Let’s address Jesus’ sitting or standing position.
First, as you mentioned, there are many scriptures that indicate that Christ sat down after His ascension (Luke 20:42-43, Eph 1:20, Eph 2:6 (seated us with Him), Col 3:1, Heb 1:3, Heb 1:13, Heb 10:12-13, Heb 12:2).
Here are some thoughts.
First, Christ won the victory over sin and death by His own blood. As such, He was rightly seated at the right hand of God the Father, not to rest, but to begin His ministry as our great mediator and intercessor. His seated position recognizes His power and authority. This was not true of the earthly priests and high priest who took the blood of animals into the earthly tabernacle. They were daily and yearly working, however not in a seated position, because it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins. However, Christ’s blood indeed has the power to forgive sins and He is our High Priest according to the power of an indestructible life.
Second, His seated position is further emphasized in Psalms 110:1 until His enemies are made a footstool for His feet. Psalms 110:1 (the reference in Luke 20:42-43, Heb 1:13 and 10:12-13) (NASB) The LORD says to my Lord: "Sit at My right hand Until I make Your enemies a footstool for Your feet."
That time is still in the future, and we don’t see any evidence of Christ’s seated position changing in Daniel 7:9, 10, 13, and 14.
For example, in verses 9 and 10, the Ancient of Days takes His seat, as well as the court took their seats. As such, we see no indication that Christ would be in an otherwise sitting position given His authority and power at the right hand of God the Father. However, what about verse 13? Let’s examine both the NASB and KJV.
Daniel 7:13 (KJV) I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him.
Daniel 7:13 (NASB) "I kept looking in the night visions, And behold, with the clouds of heaven One like a Son of Man was coming, And He came up to the Ancient of Days And was presented before Him.
Neither version (or any other translation for that matter) indicate a standing position. Rather, He is coming with the clouds of heaven and “they” brought him near, or He was “presented” before God the Father.
As such, we don’t see any evidence of “standing” or “rising” from His seated position. Bringing Christ near and presenting Him before the Ancient of Days leans more in the direction of Christ being carried.
However, there is one verse that indicates that Christ stood in the heavenly after His ascension. It was at the stoning of Stephen in Acts 7:56.
Acts 7:56 (NASB) 56 and he said, "Behold, I see the heavens opened up and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God."
This is a unique instance because this event marks the end of the seventy weeks time prophecy and judgment for Israel. As such, Jesus is seen standing by Stephen supporting His faithful servant at the time of his death.
Last thought. There are artists who render a standing Jesus before the ark of the covenant in the heavenly temple. While that makes for an interesting picture, we do not see that imagery in scripture.
Regarding the 1260, 1290, and 1335. We believe that those time prophecies were fulfilled in 1798 (for the 1260 and 1290) and 1843 (for the 1335). We believe that the “time of the end” began in 1798 and will continue until Christ’s return.
Thanks again for your comments.
Thanks for your comments as well.
It makes some reasonable sense to consider Jesus "seated at the throne" in the figurative sense of the expression to mean that He shares authority with His Father. However, to say "we see no indication that Christ would be in an otherwise sitting position given His authority and power at the right hand of God the Father" is an assumption that the texts do not provide in the eschatological portions of scripture.
Daniel 7:13, 14 and Revelation 5:6, 7 do not indicate that He was sitting on the throne. Yet, He will sit on the throne at the appointed time. To confirm this rendering of scripture, I would quote Early Writings p. 55.
"I saw the Father rise from the throne, and in a flaming chariot go into the holy of holies within the veil and sit down. Then Jesus rose up from the throne, and the most of those who were bowed down arose with Him...Then a cloudy chariot, with wheels like flaming fire, surrounded by angels, came to where Jesus was. He stepped into the chariot and was borne to the holiest, where the Father sat. There I beheld Jesus, a great High Priest, standing before the Father. On the hem of His garment was a bell and a pomegranate, a bell and a pomegranate..."
Concerning Daniel 12, why would the vision of Daniel and its specific prophetic time narrative found in chapter 12 be concerning things far in the past when it is an extension of the very last days concerning Daniel 11:44, 45 and Daniel 12:1-4? Why would God painstakingly build up such a climax to the time of the end just to have the climax be what happened in the distant past?
The contextual logic is that He is expanding the explanation and details of the very "time of the end". The Lord wants us to know specifically what we are going to have to endure and prepare for. He wants us to know that "blessed is he who waiteth and cometh to the one thousand, three hundred, FIVE, and thirty days". I capitalized the word "five" because of the way the number of the 1335 days was expressed. One of the eschatological shadows of the sanctuary system shows us the last day significance of that. Comparing these things with the SOP gives us all the exact times and events of "the time of trouble" made up of the "short time of trouble" and the "great time of trouble".
Those who go through the 1335 are going to have the same kind of experience that Jesus had when he entered into and lived out the last 3 1/2 years of His life upon the earth. This is why they are so blessed. They will go through the Gethsemane experience. They will know Christ like no other created being in the universe!
"The people of God will not be free from suffering; but while persecuted and distressed, while they endure privation and suffer for want of food they will not be left to perish....Could men see with heavenly vision, they would behold companies of angels that excel in strength stationed about those who have kept the word of Christ's patience. With sympathizing tenderness, angels have witnessed their distress and have heard their prayers. They are waiting the word of their Commander to snatch them from their peril. But they must wait yet a little longer. The people of God must drink of the cup and be baptized with the baptism. The very delay, so painful to them, is the best answer to their petitions. As they endeavor to wait trustingly for the Lord to work they are led to exercise faith, hope, and patience, which have been too little exercised during their religious experience. Yet for the elect's sake, the time of trouble will be shortened." GC pp. 629.2630.2
"Blessed is he that waiteth and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days". "He" or no one has waited for 1335 years and come to the end of it to be blessed. However, one certainly could be alive at the beginning of 1335 days before Christ's second advent and by His grace endure through "the end of the days" (Daniel 12:13) of "the time of the end" to see and experience the deliverance of the "blessed hope" first hand.
The word "he" represents this as a personal experience. Not a corporate one. "Waiteth" is referring to the first part of "the patience of the saints" and "cometh" represents the final victory in Christ for those who will be "baptized with the baptism": "the faith of Jesus".
"Truth is an advancing truth". "We are to learn something new every day" in our daily communion and devotion with the Lord. Keep moving forward, brother, for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus.
@@AngelsintheGlen
ok maybe I am confused here are you saying that Yashua and Michael are one in the same being? After all you’re referencing His being seated and Michael standing up?
If so That is a Mormon view and in error.
Let me demonstrate why.
When Satand contended for the body of Moses Michael says the Lord rebuke you which is an appeal to a higher authority obviously God so Michael is not God.
Jhon says in the beginning the word was with God and the word was God through Him and for Him were all thing made including angels including Michael; and the word became flesh and dwelt among us.
Yashu is the word and as such God. For those that would find this strange, this is not saying He was or is God the Father. God is not a personal pro noun it is a description of authority. Yashua is not the ultimate authority, the Father is His God. He said I ascend to My God and Your God. But He is all the same the Lord. He would not need to look to any higher authority as there is only one and He and the Father are always in agreement. He is the only judge in Heven or on earth. He is the Lord Michael calls on to rebuke Satan.
Jesus is God and has always been one with the Father from time eternity.
The Bible teaches us that Michael is one of many names for the eternal and divine Son of God, Jesus Christ. Please carefully understand this point. Before the eternal and divine Son of God (the Word) became flesh and dwelt among us, He first manifested Himself in the form of an angel before the creation of the world. The Bible teaches that Jesus took on the form of an angel before He placed His eternal and divine nature in human flesh at the incarnation.
With that context please watch our Michael video here for a more detailed explanation. (We are not Mormon) www.angelsintheglen.org/michael
@@AngelsintheGlen I haven't finished listening but I'm reading the comments as I go along. You have said that JESUS is GOD and is one with the Father. Please let me know if they are two separate persons. Also, if JESUS is GOD what does that make the FATHER. Thank you
Sarah Ward . I don't believe in Catholic Christianity.! Its not the same as Jesus Christ's Christianity.! To the Catholics religious beliefs. The Pope is their Saviour. .their Priest.!
So hows Michael become jesus ..and let's not go to the new testament for proof
First, Jesus is God. He has always been God and will always be one with the God the Father and the Holy Spirit. Jesus is eternal, all powerful, all knowing, ever present with His church, holy, self-existent, and unchangeable. But, as you know, in the fullness of time, Jesus, the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity and became the God-man Jesus Christ at the incarnation.
What we explain from the scriptures is that BEFORE the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity, He first placed Himself in angel form and was the protector of ancient Israel as the Angel of the LORD. The Angel of the LORD who protected Israel is Michael the Archangel. Christ was in the OT as the God-angel, i.e., the Angel of the LORD, and He was the God-man in the NT, Jesus Christ. If we critically examine the scriptures, this will become readily apparent.
Please understand that we are not the first to point this out. Many of the great Protestant Reformers also came to this conclusion. This includes Martin Luther, the father of the Reformation. Luther's associate Philip Melanchthon. The second father of the Reformation, John Calvin. The Baptist preacher Charles Spurgeon. Even John Wesley, the greatest preacher since the Apostle Paul came to this same conclusion. We can name many other great theologians and scholars, however, our purpose in putting this series together is that we've lost deep Bible study in our Churches and we need to reinvigorate the study of the scriptures like the Bereans, closely examining and testing the scriptures to see if they are true.
We're still working on this video series, but please stick with us in these studies.
I beg to differ. Michael is angel, not Jesus. Which plasphemous Bible are you reading??????
First, Jesus is God. He has always been God and will always be one with the God the Father and the Holy Spirit. Jesus is eternal, all powerful, all knowing, ever present with His church, holy, self-existent, and unchangeable.
But, as you know, in the fullness of time, Jesus, the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity and became the God-man Jesus Christ at the incarnation.
What we explain from the scriptures is that BEFORE the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity, He first placed Himself in angel form and was the protector of ancient Israel as the Angel of the LORD. The Angel of the LORD who protected Israel is Michael the Archangel. Christ was in the OT as the God-angel, i.e., the Angel of the LORD, and He was the God-man in the NT, Jesus Christ. If we critically examine the scriptures, this will become readily apparent.
Please understand that we are not the first to point this out. Many of the great Protestant Reformers also came to this conclusion. This includes Martin Luther, the father of the Reformation. Luther's associate Philip Melanchthon. The second father of the Reformation, John Calvin. The Baptist preacher Charles Spurgeon. Even John Wesley, the greatest preacher since the Apostle Paul came to this same conclusion. We can name many other great theologians and scholars, however, our purpose in putting this series together is that we've lost deep Bible study in our Churches and we need to reinvigorate the study of the scriptures like the Bereans, closely examining and testing the scriptures to see if they are true. As we said earlier, we're still working on the video series, but please stick with us in these studies.
Sarah Ward. If you can't believe in Jesus Christ and the Gospel of Christianity. . what else is there to believe in ? Without believing in Jesu's work at the cross His death and Resurrection as the first fruits from the dead. Then you. Might as well not believe in anyone or anything.!
Arch angel simply means - chief messenger - not a crested angel - christ is God but he is also known as immanuel or Jesus or michael
That day is 2021. How do I know? Because the book of Daniel was written starting in 604 BC. If you add 604 to the current date of 2021 you get a sum of 2625. Take that span of years 2625 and minus 1290 you get the sum of 1335. America is Mystery Babylon. Daniel proves that out as well. Remember that a day is like a thousand years and a thousand years is like a day.
Deuteronomy 18:22 When a prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him.
Mystery Babylon could be the Catholic Church.
@Jay Young Many things are on 7 hills. Rome, Washington D.C....
Pastor just a hint to you. Johannes 12, revelations 12, and Daniel 12 talks about the SAME THING. Jesus said in Joh 12. Now the prince of this World is CASTED. In Revel 12 Satan is CASTED. In Daniel 12 IS THE SATAN CASTED.
Using SDA doctrines, not Biblical. Daniel 8 is set in Greecian Empire as Gabriel points out Daniel 8:21-23 making a 457 Persian Empire start date impossible. Furthermore the 457 date is for building Jerusalem and can't be when the Temple is defiled from.
This is not a denominational doctrine. This is a Biblical doctrine. You are watching the Daniel 12 video, however, please go back to our Daniel 8 video to understand the framework of the two visions that Daniel sees, viz., the mareh and the chazown. Those two visions and their relationships establish the framework for the rest of Daniel (chapters 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12). Without an understanding of the two visions and their relationship, one cannot accurately understand the rest of the book. The 457 B.C. date is further explained in our Daniel 9 video. Critically evaluate everything we say in those videos. Notice how we methodically walk through verse by verse using only the Bible and history to confirm the prophecies. Hold us to the highest Biblical standard. You be the judge based upon what we say in those videos. However, to fully appreciate the entire book of Daniel, please critically evaluate our Daniel 1 video. We explain that the entire theme of the book is found in the first two verses, Daniel 1:1-2. Understanding the theme sets the stage for a comprehensive understanding of all the prophecies in Daniel.
Jesus is not Michael the ark Angle
First, Jesus is God. He has always been God and will always be one with the God the Father and the Holy Spirit. Jesus is eternal, all powerful, all knowing, ever present with His church, holy, self-existent, and unchangeable. But, as you know, in the fullness of time, Jesus, the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity and became the God-man Jesus Christ at the incarnation.
What we explain from the scriptures is that BEFORE the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity, He first placed Himself in angel form and was the protector of ancient Israel as the Angel of the LORD. The Angel of the LORD who protected Israel is Michael the Archangel. Christ was in the OT as the God-angel, i.e., the Angel of the LORD, and He was the God-man in the NT, Jesus Christ. If we critically examine the scriptures, this will become readily apparent.
Please understand that we are not the first to point this out. Many of the great Protestant Reformers also came to this conclusion. This includes Martin Luther, the father of the Reformation. Luther's associate Philip Melanchthon. The second father of the Reformation, John Calvin. The Baptist preacher Charles Spurgeon. Even John Wesley, the greatest preacher since the Apostle Paul came to this same conclusion. We can name many other great theologians and scholars, however, our purpose in putting this series together is that we've lost deep Bible study in our Churches and we need to reinvigorate the study of the scriptures like the Bereans, closely examining and testing the scriptures to see if they are true.
Sarah Ward. In the King James bible ! Time Time and a half times is the Tribulations...In the end of days. Before the second coming of Christ. We the Church will be Raptures before the Tribulations starts.! There is no way Jesus will let His Bride go though the wrath of God on the earth.!
And Jesus Christ is God in the flesh not Michel the Arch Angel.! You are confusing everything.
Did Michel create the heavens and the earth ? No. My bible KJV says The Holy Spirit of God did.!
Jesus Christ is God who became a man. He is the God-man who redeemed mankind from sin. Jesus Christ is eternal. He has always existed with the Father. Jesus Christ created all things. Everything that has come into existence has come by the power and wisdom of Jesus Christ. Michael is simply another name for Jesus. Please see our video on this topic. We explain how and why this is so. Please click here to watch: www.angelsintheglen.org/michael
Also, the time, times, and half a time occurred in the past. Please watch our entire video series starting with Daniel 1. We explain the relationship between all the time prophecies and their significance. All time prophecies in the Bible are now fulfilled and in the past. And the Church will most certainly be on the earth during the time of great tribulation. Just as the Hebrews were in the land of Goshen when the plagues fell on Egypt, so too, will the Church be on earth when the last seven plagues of Revelation 16 will fall on the entire world. However, just as God protected His people from the plagues in Egypt, so too, will God protect His Church during the end times.
Our entire series is to prepare men and women to understand exactly what must take place prior to the second coming of Christ. It's not a time to fear it's a time to be ready. God wants His people ready for the soon return of Jesus Christ. Please watch our entire series. Critically examine everything we say. We welcome any critical feedback based on our presentation of the word of God. You can reach out directly to us on our website if you have any questions. Thanks.
The Bible never says Jesus is Michael Archangel. Jesus Christ is the Son of God, not an angel.
Only Jehovah witness believe the Jesus is Micheal the Ark angel. So you are saying they are correct? There are 250 scriptures of angels in scripture, show me where it says that Jesus is Michael the ark angel? It doesn't. I have not seen Daniel interpret like this before, so I have been listening to what you have to say, but you discredit yourself in doing this.
First, Jesus is God. We demonstrate from scripture that Jesus is divine. He is considered the 2nd person of the Godhead. We have 8 videos to address all the scriptures that acknowledge that Jesus as God.
Second, Jesus is man. When the fullness of time came, Jesus, who is God, placed Himself in humanity. This is called the incarnation and is the union of God and man in the personhood of Jesus.
Third, we explain from the scriptures that BEFORE Jesus (the 2nd person of the Godhead) placed Himself in humanity, He first placed Himself in angel form and was the protector of ancient Israel as the Angel of the LORD. The Angel of the LORD who protected Israel is Michael the Archangel. Christ was in the OT as the God-angel, i.e., the Angel of the LORD, and He was the God-man in the NT, Jesus Christ.
Please understand that we are not the first to point this out. Many of the great Protestant Reformers also realized this truth by examining the scriptures. This includes Martin Luther, the father of the Reformation. Luther's associate Philip Melanchthon. The second father of the Reformation, John Calvin. The Baptist preacher Charles Spurgeon. Even John Wesley, the greatest preacher (since the Apostle Paul) came to this same conclusion. We can name many other great theologians and scholars, however, our purpose in putting this series together is that we've lost deep Bible study in our Churches, and we need to reinvigorate the study of the scriptures like the Bereans, closely examining and testing the scriptures to see if they are true.
it’s so unfortunate that Michael the archangel is equated to Jesus the only Son of God.
Jesus is God and has always been God. Jesus is the eternal God who has always existed with God and the Holy Spirit. Michael is simply another name for Jesus. We have a new video coming out soon that will explain all the Biblical references to Michael and that He is the eternal Son of God.
Michael the great prince is not Jesus Christ. Hebrews 1:5 NKJV
For to which of the angels did He ever say: "You are My Son, Today I have begotten You"? And again: "I will be to Him a Father, And He shall be to Me a Son"?
Michael is a created angel.
Thank you for your comment. We will address Hebrews 1:5 in a new video series that is in production right now.
For now, we want to provide some context. First, Jesus is God. He has always been God and will always be one with the God the Father and the Holy Spirit. Jesus is eternal, all powerful, all knowing, ever present with His church, holy, self-existent, and unchangeable. But, as you know, in the fullness of time, Jesus, the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity and became the God-man Jesus Christ at the incarnation.
What we explain from the scriptures is that BEFORE the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity, He first placed Himself in angel form and was the protector of ancient Israel as the Angel of the LORD. The Angel of the LORD who protected Israel is Michael the Archangel. Christ was in the OT as the God-angel, i.e., the Angel of the LORD, and He was the God-man in the NT, Jesus Christ. If we critically examine the scriptures, this will become readily apparent.
Please understand that we are not the first to point this out. Many of the great Protestant Reformers also came to this conclusion. This includes Martin Luther, the father of the Reformation. Luther's associate Philip Melanchthon. The second father of the Reformation, John Calvin. The Baptist preacher Charles Spurgeon. Even John Wesley, the greatest preacher since the Apostle Paul came to this same conclusion. We can name many other great theologians and scholars, however, our purpose in putting this series together is that we've lost deep Bible study in our Churches and we need to reinvigorate the study of the scriptures like the Bereans, closely examining and testing the scriptures to see if they are true. As we said earlier, we're still working on the video series, but please stick with us in these studies.
@@AngelsintheGlen Hi. I appreciate your response, I really do. Melchizedek is another similar issue. I am always open to hearing and reasoning out scripture. I will keep a look out for the teaching you do on this matter, or you could notify me. Thanks again.
@@theophobia-uk You're welcome and thanks. How about this: While we work on the additional videos, maybe you can critically evaluate our Daniel series beginning in Daniel 1. You can visit our website directly to access those videos and watch them in sequence. If you do, you can also contact us directly through our website contact page.
@@AngelsintheGlen Thanks, I'll have a look.
Some of these teachings are valuable but then some are just plain erroneous... Michael is Jesus who is YA'OH? So you not only worship a 3 headed god like the Hindus and so many others but you worship a 4 headed god. Definitely not a scholar
We're not sure the point you are trying to make, but we'll provide some thoughts to consider.
Let us briefly explain what's going on. First, Jesus is God. He has always been God and will always be one with the God the Father and the Holy Spirit.
Jesus is eternal, all powerful, all knowing, ever present with His church, holy, self-existent, and unchangeable. However, as you know, in the fullness of time, Jesus, the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity and become the God-man Jesus Christ at the incarnation.
What we explain from the scriptures is that BEFORE the second person of the Godhead placed Himself in humanity, He first placed Himself in angel form and was the protector of ancient Israel as the Angel of the LORD. The Angel of the LORD who protected Israel is Michael the Archangel. Christ was in the OT as the God-angel, i.e., the Angel of the LORD, and He was the God-man in the NT, Jesus Christ. If we critically examine the scriptures, this will become readily apparent.
Please understand that we are not the first to point this out. Many of the great Protestant Reformers also came to this conclusion. This includes Martin Luther, the father of the Reformation. Luther's associate Philip Melanchthon. The second father of the Reformation, John Calvin. The Baptist preacher Charles Spurgeon. Even John Wesley, the greatest preacher since the Apostle Paul came to this same conclusion.
We can name many other great theologians and scholars, however, our purpose in putting this series together is that we've lost deep Bible study in our Churches and we need to reinvigorate the study of the scriptures like the Bereans, closely examining and testing the scriptures to see if they are true.
We're still working on the Michael series but please consider watching this series as they become available.
Amen
Amen