Why did the Supreme Court pull up Patanjali Ayurved for its advertisements?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 มี.ค. 2024
  • Patanjali Ayurved has encountered a legal trouble as the Supreme Court imposed restrictions on its advertisements. During the peak of the second wave of COVID-19, Ramdev's controversial remarks criticising COVID-19 vaccinations and labelling allopathy as "stupid science" sparked outrage. The Indian Medical Association (IMA) filed a complaint against both Ramdev and Patanjali Ayurved, accusing them of defaming evidence-based medicine.
    Additionally, the IMA petitioned against the company's advertisements, alleging that they made false claims regarding the cure of serious diseases. Ramdev's comments on the COVID-19 vaccination campaign and modern medicine also drew criticism from the medical community. Despite Patanjali's pledge in 2023 to refrain from making false claims in court. The Supreme Court's decision to intervene stemmed from these repeated violations. Watch this video to know more details about the case.
    #PatanjaliAyurved #SupremeCourt #legaltrouble #Ramdev #COVID19 #vaccination #controversy #IndianMedicalAssociation #defamation #allopathy #evidencebasedmedicine #falseclaims #advertisements #medicalcommunity #COVID19vaccines #modernmedicine #healthcare #Ayurveda #Indianlaw #publichealth #healthpolicy #ethicalmarketing #healthawareness #healtheducation #healthscandals
    --
    Follow us on:
    Website: www.thehindubusinessline.com
    Facebook: / thehindubusinessline
    Twitter: / businessline
    Instagram: / hindu_businessline
    Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/0dT640T...

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @trilokchander3728
    @trilokchander3728 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Supreme court wants people to again fully trust in advertisements.

  • @SuganthanHarmless
    @SuganthanHarmless หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Let all companys take this as an example and do honest advertisements... with genuine information...

  • @Classical.Music.Indian
    @Classical.Music.Indian หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Namaste supreme court, when would you, if at all, pull FAIR & LOVELY to court?

    • @princepoddar2840
      @princepoddar2840 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Medical ki fake advertisement se life risk ho sakta hai , fair and lovely se life ko kuch risk nahi hota, aap khud daal sakte ho sc case id you want

  • @snookie1972
    @snookie1972 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Y dont the supreme court look into ads like soft drinks,fair cream who also claim magical cure😅.feel even supreme Power are yielding in front f IMA

  • @Thevigilantman100
    @Thevigilantman100 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lawyer bro.....👍

  • @a.r.2006
    @a.r.2006 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's really crazy for me to understand that Denial of justice of Kashmiri Pandits by Supreme Kotha as well not punishing the Main Accuse of 1983 Bhopal Gas Tragedy where whole generation of people were affected. It didn't get reaction and attention too. Neither do we heard "We will rip you apart" by a Sitting Judge. Is it really necessary to gulp up Indian companies for Ego of Judiciary?If this isn't discrimination, then what is?

  • @dr.anandarokiaraj868
    @dr.anandarokiaraj868 หลายเดือนก่อน

    By apology they accept the wrong doings

  • @riturajkundu210
    @riturajkundu210 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Baba kamdev boliye
    Aacharya nehi only bal boliye

  • @lekhavenugopal6656
    @lekhavenugopal6656 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

  • @keshavnaik8833
    @keshavnaik8833 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Super super super