OJ Simpson Trial - February 7th, 1995 - Part 1
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024
- **THIS HAS BEEN REPOSTED TO PROVIDE A BETTER QUALITY VIEWING CLIP.
OJ Simpson criminal trial from February 7th, 1995. (Carl Douglas, Christopher Darden, Testimony From Witness Tia Gavin, Robert Shapiro, Raw, Uncut)
Why does Darden keep acting like a elementary school girl
Right on .. Didnt help at all . Jury was seeing this every day.. Just looks like he is trying to hard
Because he was indeed trying “too” hard.
Because Carl Douglas loves to hear himself talk, and tries to use words he thinks will impress his audience.
You spelled "Douglas" wrong.
@@thetruthtellerojisguilty4350 agreed. And comically, Douglas struggles with use of such wording which only makss him look like more of an id!ot.
I bet those restaurant employees never thought they would be involved with something as big as this!
.
Leave it to Carl Douglas to throw down “The Race Card.”
Carl Douglas proved himself to be a RACIST.
This is an amazing witness. I also just looked her up and she's a stellar photographer with an amazing resume and very much in demand, almost thirty years later. She did an awesome job.
Marsh continues to take FOREVER to ask questions... this is going to be a lonnnnng painful case to watch
Douglas is way more professional than Darden.
What a shame. All this evidence and he still got away with it.
They really didn't have any when they were planting evidence and had missing vials of OJ blood and brought them to a crime scene
Clark forgot to ask, "Sooo, at Mezeluna, do you use VOO or EVOO - and if so which?"
I was 11 years old and I remember Tia Gavin because I thought her voice was beautiful. Still true.
She was beautiful and her voice is too.
Why does Johnnie Cochran keep acting like an adolescent school boy on his first date trying to score?
This is the Kind of delay in the case asking questions that really have nothing more to say other than the time they came in and the time they left, nothing more. The prosecution is trying to get more out of the witness than need be.
Kenneth Charles isn’t it obvious they’re trying to establish a timeline? Without people testifying to when Nicole left, then when Ron left, it leaves doubt as to when either left, and it can help in establishing time of death by the stomach contents during autopsy. If you can pin down a time when the victim last ate, going by what is known about digestion, what is found in the stomach can establish a rough time of death.
pshhh... the camera man/operator for the trial sucked! compared to the preliminary trial's own. ah man, you can't see nothing! in terms of the evidences being displayed in court, the display board or the elmo. the camera is dead set on the witnesses majority of time.
this was the point. the judge did not want the public to see the death photos
was done on purpose, but if you google Nicole Brown Ron Goldman death photos, they are ALL online!
They weren't online in 1995
Douglas talking about Brady violations.....oh, the irony. The defense STARTED by not disclosing key witnesses to the prosecution.
Apparently, you don’t understand what constitutes “Brady material”.
And again we have a foreigner posting about "Brady Material" who doesnt even know what it means. Pommie Bears do a google search it might help.
U sound uneducated. Embarassing
Nicole Brown party of ten, but the dinner ticket says nine. Tia used the counting kids excuse, but I can only count nine anyway. Who was number ten? The nine were Lou Brown, Juditha Brown, Nicole Brown, Denise Brown, Dominique Brown, Nicole's kids Sydney and Justin, plus Dominique's son and Denise's son. That's five adults, four children. Nicole's sister Tanya wasn't at the recital or the dinner.
***Update: Rachel Berman, an eight year old girl who was a friend of Sydney's, was the tenth person. Rachel was going to spend the night at Nicole's condo, but plans changed and she was picked up by one of her parents.
could a mistake have been made? it does happen
Did they ever say who actually made the reservation? For 10? Maybe whomever called the restaurant anticipated OJ may be invited? I know I’ve added an extra person or two to a reservation before in case someone else should be invited or decide to come. Just a thought as I don’t know this part of the evidence.
Kerrie Johnson - I read Denise Brown's civil trial deposition and she mentioned Rachel Berman was the tenth person. In the opening statement by the defense in the civil trial the lawyer mentioned Rachel and that her father picked her up, him spending about fifteen minutes talking to Nicole. He said Nicole didn't seem scared about anything. I don't think any of the Berman's testified though. Much like in the criminal trial, Johnny Cochran mentioned many witnesses in his opening remarks to the jury that that never testified; The same thing obviously happened in the civil trial as well.
~
What about those pictures from the civil trial? Looked like he was wearing those ugly ass shoes?
The tenth person was invented by Brian Russel and was named Speech Impediment.
As demonstrated by the most cynical demagoguery and all of the knock-on cases that draw from this legacy, the court system is as much a podium for the political activism of profiteers as it is a domain in which to seek something resembling justice.
Cochran is proud of Douglass.
@ Sharon Jones - I like Carl Douglas. If you watch him in the documentary, "OJ-Made in America" you'll end up liking him as well.
Maryann G I agree. He is good.
OJ looks over at Darden sometimes prob thinking he should of went for the TRIFECTA !!!!
Ito wants Hodgman to return so he doesn't have to deal with immature Darden and Clark
Why does the judge name the lawyers each time?
It’s part of the official trial record-the judge in any case always has to make a record of the lawyers present for each side. 🙂
Tia has a lovely side profile.
What shoes did OJ a have on at the recital? Did he go home and out on those shoes to go kill ??
Why does darden play with his wrist like that.
He should exercise before work
To be honest both sides were acting like children .
39 how do you kn0w he left
Darden’s an ass, he complained when the Defense fidnt hand stuff over in a timely fashion & the prosecution had fin the same thing since the beginning g & Darden has the nerve to
Call Mr Douglas a whiner
29 44 no I would be surprised if I said that
30 no I would be surprised if I said tha.
13:47
I want to know what the bill was and tip for a party of 10 at this restaurant..and throw in the bill of the ice cream stop....why would I want to know that because Nicole's sister said the reason they didn't go to OJs sons restaurant which they had a reservation to eat that night was just too expensive..
They had a reservation at Mezzaluna
@@NomadChristian they orginally had a reservation at OJs sons restaurant
Considering OJ was likely paying for all of it (indirectly) I doubt it mattered, but Nicole obviously wanted to go to the hot restaurant in Brentwood…
For those interested Marcia Clark,in her visit to the National Press Club (May of '97) gives reasonable explanations why certain things didn't occur that critics were clamoring for.
Ms Clark was good at giving interviews about her new career writing crime novels but no explanation as for why they could never established a timeline.
Kenneth Charles they did establish a timeline. You know the timeline they put forward, everyone does. So, their timeline was established.
Esoteric456 - Thank you very much, it is very difficult to find things nowadays with search engines unless you know exactly where to look. And might i point out how un-characteristically *exoteric* of you lol.... Much appreciated :)
@@pommiebears how did that timeline work for the prosecution. Oh nevermind they lost. Lolroflmao
He is inosent live him alone
Osbaldo Bedoya ? What?
Guilty brutal killer.
You're illiterate as fuck. No wonder you think he was INNOCENT
He's as guilty as your English teacher is.
Surmized
Wow- smoakin oj liek a crack piep